Next Article in Journal
Key Immune Events of the Pathomechanisms of Early Cardioembolic Stroke: Multi-Database Mining and Systems Biology Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification, Functional Study, and Promoter Analysis of HbMFT1, a Homolog of MFT from Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis)
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Production of Fungal Biomass Derived Constituents and Ethanol from Citrus Wastes Free Sugars without Auxiliary Nutrients in Airlift Bioreactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Indeterminate Domain Protein ROC1 Regulates Chilling Tolerance via Activation of DREB1B/CBF1 in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms17030303
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AfAP2-1, An Age-Dependent Gene of Aechmea fasciata, Responds to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment

by
Ming Lei
,
Zhi-Ying Li
,
Jia-Bin Wang
,
Yun-Liu Fu
,
Meng-Fei Ao
and
Li Xu
*
Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement in Southern China, Institute of Tropical Crop Genetic Resources, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou 571737, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(3), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030303
Submission received: 5 January 2016 / Revised: 19 February 2016 / Accepted: 19 February 2016 / Published: 27 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Bromeliaceae family is one of the most morphologically diverse families with a pantropical distribution. To schedule an appropriate flowering time for bromeliads, ethylene is commonly used to initiate flower development in adult plants. However, the mechanism by which ethylene induces flowering in adult bromeliads remains unknown. Here, we identified an APETALA2 (AP2)-like gene, AfAP2-1, in Aechmea fasciata. AfAP2-1 contains two AP2 domains and is a nuclear-localized protein. It functions as a transcriptional activator, and the activation domain is located in the C-terminal region. The expression level of AfAP2-1 is higher in juvenile plants than in adult plants, and the AfAP2-1 transcript level was rapidly and transiently reduced in plants treated with exogenous ethylene. Overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis thaliana results in an extremely delayed flowering phenotype. These results suggested that AfAP2-1 responds to ethylene and is a putative age-dependent flowering regulator in A. fasciata.

1. Introduction

The Bromeliaceae family, which consists of 3248 species in 58 genera [1,2], is one of the most morphologically diverse families with a pantropical distribution [3]. Due to the astonishing flavour and fragrance of certain fruits, some species, such as pineapple (Ananas comosus), were domesticated in northern South America possibly more than 6000 years ago [4,5]. Except for the edible pineapple, the vast majority of bromeliads cultivated worldwide are appreciated mainly for their ornamental value. Many bromeliads utilize crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a photosynthetic carbon fixation pathway that permits them to be highly productive in water-limited environments [5,6]. Thus, bromeliads, such as pineapple, are subtropical and tropical flowering plants with significant economical importance [7].
The onset of flowering is critical during the transition from the vegetative to reproductive phase in the plant lifestyle [8]. To date, five genetic pathways relevant to flowering have been identified in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana, namely, the photoperiod, vernalization, gibberellic acid, autonomous and ageing pathways [9]. During this complex developmental process, a subset of flowering-promoter and -suppressor genes participate in multiple pathways, such as APETALA2 (AP2) and five other AP2-like transcription factors (TFs), including TARGET OF EAT 1 (TOE1), TOE2, TOE3, SCHLAFMÜTZE (SMZ), and SCHNARCHZAPFEN (SNZ) [10,11,12,13]. microRNA172 (miR172), a small, non-coding RNA that can complement a region of its target genes, can post-transcriptionally repress all members of the AP2 family [14,15,16,17]. toe1 mutants have previously been shown to flower significantly early, and this effect was enhanced in toe1toe2 double-mutants [11,14]. Additionally, neither smz nor snz mutants display any notable early flowering phenotypes, whereas toe1toe2smzsnz quadruple mutants were found to flower even earlier than toe1toe2 double mutants but continued to flower significantly later than plants that constitutively express miR172 [12,14,15]. The hextuple mutant lacking all six AP2 family genes exhibits even an earlier flowering phenotype than toe1toe2smzsnz quadruple mutants, but its phenotype is similar to that of miR172-overproducing plants [18]. The overexpression of all of these genes, except TOE3, results in delayed flowering [11,12,14,18]. As floral repressors, the expression of TOE1, TOE2, SMZ and SNZ transcripts displays circadian periodicity with a peak in the early morning under long day conditions, repressing the expression of Flowering Locus T (FT), which is considered to be the florigen, in the early morning and afternoon [13]. Further investigations demonstrated that at least TOE1 and SMZ were able to bind directly to the promoter sites of FT, and the repression of FT and other flowering integrators is essential to prevent flowering [12,13]. These investigations indicated that all six AP2 family members act redundantly to repress flowering.
As a gaseous hormone, ethylene is essential for regulating variable plant developmental processes, including flowering [19,20,21]. In Arabidopsis, the activation of ethylene production can reduce bioactive gibberellin acid (GA) levels by inhibiting the protein kinase CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1 (CTR1) and increasing the levels of the downstream TF Ethylene Insensitive 3 (EIN3) [20,22]. Reduced bioactive GA levels can then increase the accumulation of DELLA proteins, a subfamily of GRAS TFs, and delay flowering by inhibiting the upregulation of the floral inducers LEAFY (LFY) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1) [20]. Interestingly, exogenous ethylene can induce the flowering of Bromeliads, such as A. comosus and Aechmea fasciata. Aviglycine ((S)-trans-2-amino-4-(2 aminoethoxy)-3-butenoic acid hydrochloride, AVG), an inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis, can delay the natural flowering of pineapple (A. comosus var. comosus) [23,24]. The silencing of one of 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (ACC synthase) genes, ACACS2, can also delay flowering in A. comosus [25]. These studies demonstrated that exogenous ethylene mediates the flowering of A. comosus by stimulating the synthesis of endogenous ethylene. However, the precise mechanism by which ethylene induces flowering in bromeliads remains unknown, posing a large obstacle to shorten the long generation cycle and flowering time and culture new varieties using attractive genetic engineering tools [6,26].
In this study, we provide the first report of the isolation and functional characterization of AfAP2-1, an AP2-like gene in A. fasciata, a popular ornamental flowering bromeliad. Transactivation assays in yeast demonstrated that the activation domain is located in the C-terminal region. Furthermore, the expression of AfAP2-1 transcripts responded to plant age and ethylene treatment in A. fasciata and that the overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Columbia-0 (Col-0) background Arabidopsis (Wild Type, WT) significantly delayed flowering in both short-day (SD) and long-day (LD) conditions. These results all support the conclusion that AfAP2-1, a TF of the AP2 family, may play a pivotal role in regulating flowering time in Arabidopsis.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Sequence Analysis of AfAP2-1

AP2-like cDNA was isolated from A. fasciata via the rapid-amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) strategy (primers are listed in Table S1) combined with the analysis of transcriptome data. The cDNA of AfAP2-1 (GenBank accession no. KU350628) was 2057 bp long, with a 375-bp 5′ untranslated region (UTR), a 320-bp 3′ UTR and a 1362-bp open reading frame (ORF). A comparison of the AfAP2-1 cDNA with five miR172s in A. fasciata revealed a putative miR172 recognition site (1238CTGCAGCATCATCAGGATTCT1258) within the sequence encoding the C terminus of AfAP2-1, which is outside of the conserved AP2 domains.
The AfAP2-1 cDNA was predicted to encode a 453-amino acid protein (Figure 1A) with a molecular weight and isoelectric point (pI) of 49.50 kDa and 8.52, respectively. A BLASTP search indicated that the deduced polypeptide is similar to AP2 or AP2-like proteins from a range of plant species (Figure 1A). A sequence comparison between AfAP2-1 and six AP2 family members in Arabidopsis showed that (1) the putative ten-amino-acid localization signal (amino acids from 138 to 147) is completely conserved and (2) the double AP2 domains (amino acids from 150 to 208 and from 241 to 284) and the linker between them are highly similar (Figure 1A,B).
A phylogenetic analysis of AfAP2-1 and 23 AP2 and AP2-like proteins from other species further confirmed that AfAP2-1 is a member of the AP2 subfamily (Figure 2). The result revealed that AfAP2-1 (indicated with a red box) was more closely related to the AP2-like proteins of monocotyledonous herbaceous plants, such as Dendrobium crumenatum, than the AP2-like proteins of woody plants, such as Olea europaea.

2.2. Transcript Profiling of AfAP2-1 in A. fasciata

To gain insight into the role of AfAP2-1 in A. fasciata, we used quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to analyse its transcription levels in various vegetative and reproductive organs of both juvenile and adult plants (Figure 3A,B). AfAP2-1 transcripts were detected in all vegetative organs, including mature leaves, central leaves, stems and roots. In all developmental stages tested, AfAP2-1 mRNA was more abundant in mature leaves than in all other organs (Figure 3A,B). In addition, the accumulation of AfAP2-1 transcripts showed significant changes during development, with relatively high levels in juvenile plants, a decrease in adult plants prior to flower bud differentiation, and a further decrease in 39-day-after-flowering (DAF) adult plants (Figure 3A). Interestingly, the qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of AfAP2-1 was low in multiple flowering organs, especially in bracts, sepals, petals, stamens and pistils (Figure 3B). These results suggest that AfAP2-1 may play a role in phase transition rather than in floral meristem identity.

2.3. Relative Expression of AfAP2-1 under the Control of the Circadian Rhythm

To investigate the circadian patterns of AfAP2-1 expression, we examined central leaves of both juvenile and adult plants grown under a natural daily light rhythm in a greenhouse (ambient temperature of 30–32 °C) on 2 August 2014 (Figure 3C). In juvenile plants, the expression of AfAP2-1 exhibited a peak at 02:00 h. In addition, another peak was observed at 10:00 h, approximately 3.5 h after sunrise. The third peak emerged at 18:00, 1 h before sunset. Furthermore, similar morning and afternoon peaks were also observed in adult plants, although the expression of AfAP2-1 transcripts was consistently lower than in juvenile plants at every detected time point (Figure 3C). These observations indicated that AfAP2-1 expression responded to the natural daily light rhythm and was unrelated to plant age.

2.4. Response to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment

To investigate the possible involvement of AfAP2-1 in response to exogenous ethylene treatment, we also evaluated its expression in various organs of juvenile and adult plants exposed to exogenous ethylene treatment (Figure 3D). The AfAP2-1 transcripts showed a rapid and transit reduction in all examined organs after 1 h of treatment with ethylene. After 6 h, AfAP2-1 expression could not be detected in any organ in juvenile and adult plants. This result indicated that the transcription of AfAP2-1 was significantly reduced by exogenous ethylene treatment.

2.5. AfAP2-1 Exhibits Transactivation Activity in Yeast

AfAP2-1 contains two AP2 domains in the N terminus, making it a member of the AP2 TF subfamily of the AP2/EREBP superfamily. A transactivation assay was performed in yeast to assess the function of this protein as a transcriptional activator. The sequences encoding the N terminus, C terminus and full-length protein of AfAP2-1 were individually fused with the GAL4 binding domain using the pGBKT7 vector and transformed into the yeast strain Y2HGold, which contains AUR1-C and MEL1 reporter genes (Figure 4A). The expression of AUR1-C and MEL1 can confer strong resistance to the highly toxic drug Aureobasidin A (AbA) and turn the yeast cells blue in the presence of the chromagenic substrate X-α-Gal. Yeast cells carrying pGBKT7-AfAP2-1 and pGBKT7-AfAP2-1C, as well as the positive control, but not pGBKT7-AfAP2-1N, can grow on plates containing synthetic dropout (SD) /Trp-/X-α-Gal+/AbA+ medium, indicating that AfAP2-1 has transactivity and that the transactivation domain is located in the C terminus (Figure 4B).

2.6. Subcellular Localization of AfAP2-1 Protein

Based on a consensus sequence analysis, a completely conserved NLS was identified in the N terminus of AfAP2-1 protein (Figure 1A,B). To confirm the presumed nuclear localization of AfAP2-1, a fusion protein consisting of AfAP2-1 fused to the N terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was transiently expressed in Arabidopsis protoplasts. As shown in Figure 5, the GFP protein was uniformly distributed throughout the cells, whereas the AfAP2-1-GFP fusion protein was localized predominantly in the nucleus, suggesting that the latter is constitutively localized to the nucleus.

2.7. Constitutive Overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis Causes Significantly Delayed Flowering Phenotype

To assess the involvement of AfAP2-1 in the regulation of flowering time, we overexpressed AfAP2-1 in WT and transformed the empty vector into the WT as a control. Notably, the bolting time did not differ between the WT and WT transformed with the empty vector, but the AfAP2-1-OX lines exhibited a significantly delayed flowering phenotype under both inductive LD and noninductive SD conditions (Figure 6A,B). AfAP2-1-OX lines bolted an average of 14.4 and 28.7 d later than the WT controls under LD and SD conditions, respectively. In addition, the AfAP2-1-OX lines exhibited 16.3 and 14.4 more rosette leaves than WT controls in average under LD and SD conditions, respectively (Figure 6C,D). These results indicated that the overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis significantly delayed flowering time.

3. Discussion

The members of the APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Element Binding Protein (AP2/EREBP) superfamily, which contain at least one AP2 domain, are responsive to multiple environmental stimuli and represent conservatively widespread TFs in the control of growth and developmental programs of the plants, protists, cyanobacteria and fungi [27,28]. The AP2/EREBP superfamily can be divided into the AP2 and EREBP families according to the number of AP2 domains. Specifically, members of this superfamily that are characterized by a tandem repeat of two AP2 domains are part of the AP2 family [28]. The AP2 family is further divided into two groups, AP2 and ANT, based on differences in the amino acid residues of the double AP2 domains and the NLS [28,29].
In this study, we provided the first report of the isolation of an AP2-like gene, AfAP2-1, from A. fasciata. A sequence analysis identified two conserved AP2 domains, a highly conserved putative NLS adjacent to AP2R1 and three other conserved motifs that have been identified in several AP2-like proteins (Figure 1B). These conserved domains and motifs may be essential for the functional conservation and evolution of AfAP2-1 [10,29,30,31] (Figure 1A,B).

3.1. Overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis Strongly Delayed Flowering under both LD and SD Conditions

Two copies of AP2 domains separated by a spacer region confer AP2 subfamily members with the ability to bind the promoter region of target genes [32]. Our results indicated that AfAP2-1 plays a role as a transactivator and that the activation domain is located in the C terminus, which did not contain two AP2 domains (Figure 4B). This result contradicted that obtained for AP2 isolated from Brassica napus, whose transcriptional activity was localized to the N terminus [33]. This difference indicates structural divergence during AP2 evolution.
TFs regulate the expression of numerous genes to mediate many patterning processes in the plant kingdom by binding to specific sites or motifs of DNA sequences [34,35]. The AP2/EREBP TF family, which contains nearly 7% of all TFs in Arabidopsis, are involved in multiple signalling processes [36]. Previous studies demonstrated that all six AP2 family genes in Arabidopsis act redundantly to repress flowering [11,12,14,18], and at least TOE1 and SMZ can repress floral induction by inhibiting the photoperiod pathway [12,13]. To investigate the role of AfAP2-1 in floral induction, we overexpressed this gene in Arabidopsis. Our results show that the heterogeneous overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis significantly delayed flowering time under both the LD and SD conditions (Figure 6A,B). Furthermore, AfAP2-1-OX transgenic lines contained significantly more rosette leaves than WT plants (Figure 6C,D), indicating that AfAP2-1 may play an important role in promoting the vegetative growth of Arabidopsis. TOE1 can bind to an AT-rich element in the FT promoter near the CONSTANS (CO)-binding site to convey a photoperiodic signal to regulate flowering time [13]. Our study identified several AT-rich elements in the promoter of AfFT2, a putative florigen in A. fasciata, implying the putative direct binding site(s) of members of the AP2 subfamily, such as AfAP2-1 (data not shown). Furthermore, the relative expression of AfAP2-1 was under the control of the circadian rhythm (Figure 3C), similar to the control of TOE1, TOE2, SMZ and SNZ [13]. This regulation implies that AfAP2-1 proteins may function not only in the morning and afternoon but also late at night (Figure 3C). Further investigation should be focused on verifying the interactions between AfAP2-1 and FT-like genes or other flowering integrators in A. fasciata.

3.2. The Abundance of AfAP2-1 Transcripts Is Negatively Regulated by Exogenous Ethylene Treatment

Although ethylene is widely used to induce the flowering of bromeliads to both avoid the desynchrony of natural flowering and reduce time and manpower costs, this forced flowering also depends on the plant development age, i.e., adult plants can successfully bolt, whereas juvenile plants cannot. To date, the precise mechanism by which ethylene induces flowering is unknown. Our previous study identified several members of the AP2/EREBP family that may be involved in both the ethylene-responsive and age-dependent flowering pathways [37], indicating that AP2-like genes may play a role in this complex process. Jung [11] demonstrated that the transcript levels of TOE1 and TOE2 gradually decreased throughout plant growth. CfTOE1 is also involved in age-dependent flowering in Cardamine flexuosa [38]. In our study, the expression of AfAP2-1 also depended on the plant development age; it was relatively high in juvenile plants, decreased in adult plants prior to flower bud differentiation, and further decreased in 39-DAF adult plants (Figure 3A). To date, the correlation between ethylene and AP2 subfamily members has not yet been investigated. Here, we showed that the transcripts levels of AfAP2-1 in all detected organs dramatically decreased after treatment with 400 μL·L−1 of ethrel for 1 h and were almost undetectable after 6 h, indicating the rapid response of AfAP2-1 to exogenous ethylene treatment both in juvenile and in adult plants (Figure 3D). Exogenous ethylene treatment after 6 h also strongly induced AfFT2 expression in central leaves and stems (unpublished data). The response time delay of AfFT2 compared with that of AfAP2-1 implied that AfAP2-1 may be upstream of AfFT2. These results all indicate that a decrease in the expression of AfAP2-1 below a threshold may induce bolting in adult bromeliads treated with exogenous ethylene, but not juveniles, or that some other regulators may be involved in this complex process. Further studies should focus on verifying the precise mechanism by which ethylene affects AfAP2-1.
In conclusion, our results indicate that AfAP2-1 is an AP2 family gene expressed in A. fasciata. The overexpression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis significantly delayed flowering, implying that the molecular mechanism by which AfAP2-1 affects flowering may be partially conserved between Arabidopsis and A. fasciata. Further analyses of the interactions between ethylene-responsive factors and AfAP2-1 and transgenic plants of A. fasciata will help us to better understand the function of AfAP2-1 in flowering and provide a theoretical basis for the genetic engineering of A. fasciata and possibly other species of bromeliads.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The juvenile (6–8 months) and adult (11–14 months) plants of A. fasciata used in this study were grown in a greenhouse (ambient temperature was 30–32 °C) located in the experimental area at the Institute of Tropical Crop Genetic Resources of the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CATAS). The mature leaves, central leaves, stems, roots and variable organs of flowers were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for further research.
The seeds of both the wild-type and transgenic lines of Arabidopsis were incubated in the dark at 4 °C for 2 days to ensure synchronized germination and were then surface-sterilized before being plated on Murashige and Skoog (MS)-supplemented medium containing 2% sucrose and 0.8% agar. The plates were grown in a chamber under LD (16 h light and 8 h dark) or SD (8 h light and 16 h dark) conditions with a photon flux density of 100 μmol·m−2·s−1 at 23 °C. Ten days later, the seedlings were transplanted into turf soil for continuous growth.

4.2. Isolation and Sequencing of the AfAP2-1 Gene

To isolate the AfAP2-1 gene, total RNA was extracted from the central leaves of A. fasciata using Hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) methods [39]. Based on the transcriptome data of A. fasciata, 5′ and 3′ RACE was performed using a SMARTer™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used here are listed in Table S1. The specific 5′ and 3′ fragments were cloned into pEASY-blunt vectors (Transgene, Beijing, China) and sequenced by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Guangzhou, China).

4.3. Bioinformatic Analysis

The molecular weight and pI of the deduced amino acid sequence of AfAP2-1 were calculated online using the ProtParam tool [40]. The ORF was predicted using ORF Finder [41]. The homologous protein sequences of AfAP2-1 were identified using BLAST [42]. Amino acid sequence alignment was carried out using Cluster Omega [43]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA version 6 [44] using the neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.4. qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from various organs of A. fasciata using CTAB methods [39] or from the leaves of Arabidopsis using an E.Z.N.A. Total RNA Kit I (Omega, Norcross, UK). First-strand cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen, Beijing, China). qRT-PCR was performed using TransStart Tip Green qPCR SuperMix (Transgen) on a Therma PikoReal 96™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, New York, NY, USA). Two biological replicates and three technical replicates for each sample were included in each PCR assay. The data were analysed using the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described by Livak and Schmittgen [45]. The α-actin and β-tubulin genes of A. fasciata were used as the internal control. All primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S1.

4.5. Plant Expression Vector Construction and Arabidopsis Transformation

To construct the overexpression vector 35S::AfAP2-1, the coding sequence (CDS) of AfAP2-1 was excised from the pEASY-blunt cloning vector using the restriction enzymes KpnI and XbaI, after which the fragment was cloned into pBI121.
The confirmed construct was transformed into Col-0 background Arabidopsis using agrobacterium strain EHA105, as described by Clough and Bent [46]. Transgenic seedlings were selected on MS agar medium supplemented with 25 mg/L hygromycin and 50 mg/L kanamycin and verified by genomic PCR and RT-PCR. The T2 transgenic homologous lines were selected for further analyses.

4.6. Transactivation Analysis of AfAP2-1 in Yeast Cells

The ORF (1–453 amino acids), the AP2 domains containing the N terminus (1–294 amino acids) and the C terminus (284–453 amino acids) were fused in frame with the yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain vector pGBKT7 (pBD) to yield the expression vectors pBD-AfAP2-1, pBD-AfAP2-1N and pBD-AfAP2-1C. pBD and pGAL4 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The primers used are listed in Table S1. The constructs were transformed into yeast strain Y2HGold containing the reporter genes LacZ and AbA according to the instructions in the MatchmakerTM Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System User Manual (Clontech, Tokyo, Japan). Putative positive yeast colonies were selected on synthetic dropout (SD) medium for tryptophan (Clontech, Tokyo, Japan). After confirmation by PCR, the positive yeast transformants were scratched, and 2 μL of diluted liquid strains was dripped onto SD-deleting tryptophan medium containing X-α-gal and AbA. The cultures were then incubated at 30 °C for 3 days to determine the transactivation activity.

4.7. Subcellular Localization of AfAP2-1 Protein

The full-length CDS of AfAP2-1 was amplified using the primers AfAP2-1-GFP-F and AfAP2-1-GFP-R (Table S1) to generate the 35S::AfAP2-1-GFP. The resulting fusion constructs and empty vector 35S::GFP were then transformed into the protoplasts of Arabidopsis. GFP fluorescence was observed by confocal scanning microscopy (OLYMPUS FV1000, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). For GFP, 488 and 505–530 nm were used for excitation and emission, respectively. For chlorophyll auto-fluorescence, a 488 nm laser line and a 650–750 nm bandpass filter were used for excitation and emission, respectively.

4.8. Exogenous Ethylene Treatment of A. fasciata

To test the response to ethylene, juvenile (6–8 months) and adult (11–14 months) plants of A. fasciata grown in a greenhouse (ambient temperature of 30–32 °C) were treated with 400 μL·L−1 of ethrel for 1, 6 or 24 h. The mature leaves, central leaves, stems and roots were then physically isolated and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted as described by Cong et al. [39]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen) for further research.

4.9. Data Analysis

All data were represented as the mean ± standard deviation of three or more biological replicates.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/3/303/s1.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31372106) and the Fundamental Scientific Research Funds for CATAS-TCGRI (1630032014018).

Author Contributions

Ming Lei, Zhi-Ying Li and Li Xu conceived and designed the experiment; Ming Lei, Yun-Liu Fu, Meng-Fei Ao performed the experiment; Ming Lei, Jia-Bin Wang and Li Xu analyzed the data; Ming Lei, Zhi-Ying Li and Li Xu wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AP2: APETALA2; TF: transcription factor; TOE1: TARGET OF EAT 1; SMZ: SCHLAFMÜTZE; SNZ: SCHNARCHZAPFEN; miR172: microRNA172; FT: Flowering Locus T; GA: gibberellin acid; EIN3: Ethylene Insensitive 3; CTR1: CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1; LFY: LEAFY; SOC1: SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1; AVG: Aviglycine; ACC synthase: 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase; Col-0: Columbia-0; SD: short-day; LD: long-day; RACE: rapid-amplification of cDNA ends; DAF: day-after-flowering; GFP: green fluorescent protein; DAG: days after germination; AP2/EREBP: APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Element Binding Protein.

References

  1. Luther, H.E. An Alphabetical List of Bromeliad Binomials; The Bromeliad Society International: Sarasota, FL, USA, 2000; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Versieux, L.M.; Barbará, T.; das Graças Lapa Wanderley, M.D.; Calvente, A.; Fay, M.F.; Lexer, C. Molecular phylogenetics of the Brazilian giant bromeliads (Alcantarea, Bromeliaceae): Implications for morphological evolution and biogeography. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 64, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Givnish, T.J.; Barfuss, M.H.J.; Ee, B.V.; Riina, R.; Schulte, K. Phylogeny, adaptive radiation, and historical biogeography in Bromeliaceae: Insights from an Eight-Locus Plastid Phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, 872–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Clement, C.R.; de Cristo-Araújo, M.; Coppens D’Eeckenbrugge, G.; Pereira, A.A.; Picanço-Rodrigues, D. Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2010, 2, 72–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ming, R.; VanBuren, R.; Wai, C.M.; Tang, H.B.; Schatz, M.C.; Bowers, J.E.; Lyons, E.; Wang, M.L.; Chen, J.; Biggers, E.; et al. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Neuteboom, L.W.; Kunimitsu, W.Y.; Webb, D.; Christopher, D.A. Characterization and tissue-regulated expression of genes involved in pineapple (Ananas. comosus L.) root development. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 1021–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zanella, C.M.; Janke, A.; Palma-Silva, C.; Kaltchuk-Santos, E.; Pinheiro, F.G.; Paggi, G.M.; Soares, L.E.S.; Goetze, M.; Büttow, M.V.; Bered, F. Genetics, evolution and conservation of Bromeliaceae. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, J.W.; Czech, B.; Weigel, D. miR156-Regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 2009, 138, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Srikanth, A.; Schmid, M. Regulation of flowering time: All roads lead to Rome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2013–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jofuku, K.D.; den Boer, B.G.; van Montagu, M.; Okamuro, J.K. Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1211–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jung, J.H.; Seo, Y.H.; Seo, P.J.; Reyes, J.L.; Yun, J.; Chua, N.H.; Park, C.M. The GIGANTEA-regulated microRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2736–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mathieu, J.; Yant, L.J.; Mürdter, F.; Küttner, F.; Schmid, M. Repression of flowering by the miR172 target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, C.; Ma, H. Arabidopsis TOE proteins convey a photoperiodic signal to antagonize CONSTANS and regulate flowering time. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aukerman, M.J.; Sakai, H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2730–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 2004, 303, 2022–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Achard, P.; Herr, A.; Baulcombe, D.C.; Harberd, N.P. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 2004, 131, 3357–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schwab, R.; Palatnik, J.F.; Riester, M.; Schommer, C.; Schmid, M.; Weigel, D. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yant, L.; Mathieu, J.; Dinh, T.T.; Ott, F.; Lanz, C.; Wollmann, H.; Chen, X.; Schmid, M. Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2156–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ogawara, T.; Higashi, K.; Kamada, H.; Ezura, H. Ethylene advances the transition from vegetative growth to flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 160, 1335–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Achard, P.; Baghour, M.; Chapple, A.; Hedden, P.; van der Straeten, D.; Genschik, P.; Moritz, T.; Harberd, N.P. The plant stress hormone ethylene controls floral transition via DELLA-dependent regulation of floral meristem-identity genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6484–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Switzenberg, J.A.; Little, H.A.; Hammar, S.A.; Grumet, R. Floral primordia-targeted ACS (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase) expression in transgenic Cucumis melo implicates fine tuning of ethylene production mediating unisexual flower development. Planta 2014, 240, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Achard, P.; Cheng, H.; de Grauwe, L.; Decat, J.; Schoutteten, H.; Moritz, T.; van der Straeten, D.; Peng, J.; Harberd, N.P. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science 2006, 311, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kuan, C.S.; Yu, C.W.; Lin, M.L.; Hsu, H.T. Foliar application of aviglycine reduces natural flowering in pineapple. Hortscience 2005, 40, 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, R.H.; Hsu, Y.M. Delaying natural flowering in pineapple through foliar application of aviglycine, an inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. Hortscience 2007, 42, 1188–1191. [Google Scholar]
  25. Trusov, Y.; Botella, J.R. Silencing of the ACC synthase gene ACACS2 causes delayed flowering in pineapple (Ananas. comosus (L.) Merr.). J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 3953–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, K. Agrobacterium Protocols. In Methods in Molecular Biology, 3rd ed.; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 293–294. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wessler, S.R. Homing into the origin of the AP2 DNA binding domain. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Licausi, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Perata, P. APETALA2/Ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shigyo, M.; Ito, M. Analysis of gymnosperm two-AP2-domain-containing genes. Dev. Genes Evol. 2004, 214, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vahala, T.; Oxelman, B.; von Arnold, S. Two APETALA2-like genes of Picea. abies are differentially expressed during development. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tang, M.; Li, G.; Chen, M. The phylogeny and expression pattern of APETALA2-like genes in rice. J. Genet. Genom. 2007, 34, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Okamuro, J.K.; Caster, B.; Villarroel, R.; van Montagu, M.; Jofuku, K.D. The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7076–7081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, B.; Xiong, Z.; Chen, C.; Wang, L.; Yu, J.; Lu, C.; Wei, W. Functional identification and characterization of the Brassica napus transcription factor gene BnAP2, the ortholog of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA2. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33890. [Google Scholar]
  34. Krishnaswamy, S.; Verma, S.; Rahman, M.H.; Kav, N.N.V. Functional characterization of four APETALA2-family genes (RAP2.6, RAP2.6L, DREB19 and DREB26) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Krogan, N.T.; Hogan, K.; Long, J.A. APETALA2 negatively regulates multiple floral organ identity genes in Arabidopsis by recruiting the co-repressor TOPLESS and the histone deacetylase HDA19. Development 2012, 139, 4180–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vogel, M.O.; Gomez-Perez, D.; Probst, N. Combinatorial signal integration by APETALA2/Ethylene response factor (ERF)-transcription factors and the involvement of AP2-2 in starvation response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 5933–5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Lei, M.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, L. Transcriptome sequencing determined flowering pathway genes in Aechmea. fasciata treated with ethylene. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 2015, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, C.M.; Zhang, T.Q.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Lian, H.; Tang, H.; Feng, Z.Y.; Zozomova-Lihová, J.; Wang, J.W. Molecular basis of age-dependent vernalization in Cardamine flexuosa. Science 2013, 340, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cong, H.; Li, Z.; Xu, L. Characterizing developmental and inducible differentiation between juvenile and adult plants of Aechmea fasciata treated with ethylene by transcriptomic analysis. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 69, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. The ProtParam tool. Avaliable online: http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ (accessed on 1 January 2016).
  41. ORF Finder. Avaliable online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gorf/ (accessed on 1 January 2016).
  42. BLAST. Avaliable online: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 1 January 2016).
  43. Cluster Omega. Avaliable online: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/ (accessed on 1 January 2016).
  44. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 00303 g001 1024
Figure 1. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of AfAP2-1 with AP2 and AP2-like proteins of Arabidopsis and the structure of AfAP2-1. (A) Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of AfAP2-1 with AP2 and AP2-like proteins of Arabidopsis. The red line indicates the completely conserved putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences, and the blue and black lines indicate the two AP2 domains (AP2R1 and AP2R2). At: Arabidopsis thaliana. AtAP2: AEE86718; AtTOE1: AEC08137; AtTOE2: AED97280; AtTOE3: AED98311; AtSMZ: AEE79323; AtSNZ: AEC09650; (B) The structure of AfAP2-1. The sequences of three motifs of AfAP2-1 and all six AP2 members in Arabidopsis are shown. “-“ represents the gap produced in the multiple alignments.
Figure 1. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of AfAP2-1 with AP2 and AP2-like proteins of Arabidopsis and the structure of AfAP2-1. (A) Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of AfAP2-1 with AP2 and AP2-like proteins of Arabidopsis. The red line indicates the completely conserved putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences, and the blue and black lines indicate the two AP2 domains (AP2R1 and AP2R2). At: Arabidopsis thaliana. AtAP2: AEE86718; AtTOE1: AEC08137; AtTOE2: AED97280; AtTOE3: AED98311; AtSMZ: AEE79323; AtSNZ: AEC09650; (B) The structure of AfAP2-1. The sequences of three motifs of AfAP2-1 and all six AP2 members in Arabidopsis are shown. “-“ represents the gap produced in the multiple alignments.
Ijms 17 00303 g001
Ijms 17 00303 g002 1024
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of AfAP2-1 and AP2 and AP2-like proteins from other plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA version 6 using the neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar indicates the branch length. Species abbreviations: Af: Aechmea fasciata; At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Ata: Aegilops tauschii; Dc: Dendrobium crumenatum; Gb: Ginkgo biloba; Hv: Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare; In: Ipomoea nil; Oe: Olea europaea; Os: Oryza sativa Japonica Group; Ot: Ostreococcus tauri; Pa: Picea abies; Pt: Pinus thunbergii; Sl: Solanum lycopersicum; Zm: Zea mays.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of AfAP2-1 and AP2 and AP2-like proteins from other plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA version 6 using the neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar indicates the branch length. Species abbreviations: Af: Aechmea fasciata; At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Ata: Aegilops tauschii; Dc: Dendrobium crumenatum; Gb: Ginkgo biloba; Hv: Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare; In: Ipomoea nil; Oe: Olea europaea; Os: Oryza sativa Japonica Group; Ot: Ostreococcus tauri; Pa: Picea abies; Pt: Pinus thunbergii; Sl: Solanum lycopersicum; Zm: Zea mays.
Ijms 17 00303 g002
Ijms 17 00303 g003 1024
Figure 3. Expression of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of A. fasciata. (A) The expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of juvenile and adult plants. 1, juvenile plants; 2, adult plants before differentiation; 3, adult plants of 39-DAF flowering. ML, mature leaves; CL, central leaves; S, stems; R, roots; (B) Expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of 39-DAF flowering adult plants; (C) Expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in central leaves of A. fasciata grown in the greenhouse at natural daily light rhythm. Samples were collected at 2 h intervals. The dark bars indicate the dark period, and the white bar indicates the light period; (D) The expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of A. fasciata in response to exogenous ethylene treatment for different times. 0, 1, 6 and 24 indicate the exogenous ethylene treatment time (h). Three independent experiments were performed, and values are shown as means and error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3. Expression of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of A. fasciata. (A) The expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of juvenile and adult plants. 1, juvenile plants; 2, adult plants before differentiation; 3, adult plants of 39-DAF flowering. ML, mature leaves; CL, central leaves; S, stems; R, roots; (B) Expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of 39-DAF flowering adult plants; (C) Expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in central leaves of A. fasciata grown in the greenhouse at natural daily light rhythm. Samples were collected at 2 h intervals. The dark bars indicate the dark period, and the white bar indicates the light period; (D) The expression level of AfAP2-1 transcripts in various tissues of A. fasciata in response to exogenous ethylene treatment for different times. 0, 1, 6 and 24 indicate the exogenous ethylene treatment time (h). Three independent experiments were performed, and values are shown as means and error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).
Ijms 17 00303 g003
Ijms 17 00303 g004 1024
Figure 4. Transactivation activity assay of AfAP2-1 in yeast cells. (A) Schematics of the constructs of pGBKT7 (pBD) vectors fused with full-length AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1), the N terminus of AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1N) and the C terminus of AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1C); (B) Transactivation activity assay in yeast cells. pBD and pGAL4 plasmids were transformed into Y2HGold cells and used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Yeast clones containing the right constructs grew on SD/Trp- medium at dilutions of 1, 1/10 and 1/100. Three to five days later, the right clones were transferred onto SD/Trp-/AbA+/X-α-gal+ medium for continuous growth for three days to test their transactivation activities. SD: synthetic dropout; AbA: Aureobasidin A; SD/Trp-: SD medium without Trp; SD/Trp-/AbA+/X-α-gal+: SD medium without Trp, but with 40 mg/L X-α-gal and 200 µg/L AbA.
Figure 4. Transactivation activity assay of AfAP2-1 in yeast cells. (A) Schematics of the constructs of pGBKT7 (pBD) vectors fused with full-length AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1), the N terminus of AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1N) and the C terminus of AfAP2-1 (pBD-AfAP2-1C); (B) Transactivation activity assay in yeast cells. pBD and pGAL4 plasmids were transformed into Y2HGold cells and used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Yeast clones containing the right constructs grew on SD/Trp- medium at dilutions of 1, 1/10 and 1/100. Three to five days later, the right clones were transferred onto SD/Trp-/AbA+/X-α-gal+ medium for continuous growth for three days to test their transactivation activities. SD: synthetic dropout; AbA: Aureobasidin A; SD/Trp-: SD medium without Trp; SD/Trp-/AbA+/X-α-gal+: SD medium without Trp, but with 40 mg/L X-α-gal and 200 µg/L AbA.
Ijms 17 00303 g004
Ijms 17 00303 g005 1024
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of AfAP2-1-GFP fusion protein. Green fluorescence indicates GFP, and red fluorescence shows chloroplast auto-fluorescence. pCM1205-GFP: control lacking the transit peptide; Nuc-GFP: control with the nuclear localization signal of fibrillarin. AfAP2-1-GFP: GFP signals from the AfAP2-1-GFP fusion protein. The fluorescence signals were visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scale bar: 5 µm.
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of AfAP2-1-GFP fusion protein. Green fluorescence indicates GFP, and red fluorescence shows chloroplast auto-fluorescence. pCM1205-GFP: control lacking the transit peptide; Nuc-GFP: control with the nuclear localization signal of fibrillarin. AfAP2-1-GFP: GFP signals from the AfAP2-1-GFP fusion protein. The fluorescence signals were visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scale bar: 5 µm.
Ijms 17 00303 g005
Ijms 17 00303 g006 1024
Figure 6. Heterologous expression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypes of transgenic plants grown under LD conditions at 30 days after germination (DAG); (B) Phenotypes of transgenic plants grown under SD conditions at 42 DAG; (C) Days and rosette leaves to bolting of WT and transgenic plants grown under LD conditions; (D) Days and rosette leaves to bolting of WT and transgenic plants grown under SD conditions. Values are means ± standard deviation of the results from 26 individual plants of WT, 21 individual plants of WT transformed with the empty vector and 16 individual plants of AfAP2-1-OX lines.
Figure 6. Heterologous expression of AfAP2-1 in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypes of transgenic plants grown under LD conditions at 30 days after germination (DAG); (B) Phenotypes of transgenic plants grown under SD conditions at 42 DAG; (C) Days and rosette leaves to bolting of WT and transgenic plants grown under LD conditions; (D) Days and rosette leaves to bolting of WT and transgenic plants grown under SD conditions. Values are means ± standard deviation of the results from 26 individual plants of WT, 21 individual plants of WT transformed with the empty vector and 16 individual plants of AfAP2-1-OX lines.
Ijms 17 00303 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lei, M.; Li, Z.-Y.; Wang, J.-B.; Fu, Y.-L.; Ao, M.-F.; Xu, L. AfAP2-1, An Age-Dependent Gene of Aechmea fasciata, Responds to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030303

AMA Style

Lei M, Li Z-Y, Wang J-B, Fu Y-L, Ao M-F, Xu L. AfAP2-1, An Age-Dependent Gene of Aechmea fasciata, Responds to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(3):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lei, Ming, Zhi-Ying Li, Jia-Bin Wang, Yun-Liu Fu, Meng-Fei Ao, and Li Xu. 2016. "AfAP2-1, An Age-Dependent Gene of Aechmea fasciata, Responds to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 3: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030303

APA Style

Lei, M., Li, Z.-Y., Wang, J.-B., Fu, Y.-L., Ao, M.-F., & Xu, L. (2016). AfAP2-1, An Age-Dependent Gene of Aechmea fasciata, Responds to Exogenous Ethylene Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop