You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Molecules
  • Review
  • Open Access

3 November 2023

Rosavin: Research Advances in Extraction and Synthesis, Pharmacological Activities and Therapeutic Effects on Diseases of the Characteristic Active Ingredients of Rhodiola rosea L.

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
2
The First Clinical Medical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
3
School of Basic Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Rhodiola rosea L. (RRL) is a popular plant in traditional medicine, and Rosavin, a characteristic ingredient of RRL, is considered one of the most important active ingredients in it. In recent years, with deepening research on its pharmacological actions, the clinical application value and demand for Rosavin have been steadily increasing. Various routes for the extraction and all-chemical or biological synthesis of Rosavin have been gradually developed for the large-scale production and broad application of Rosavin. Pharmacological studies have demonstrated that Rosavin has a variety of biological activities, including antioxidant, lipid-lowering, analgesic, antiradiation, antitumor and immunomodulation effects. Rosavin showed significant therapeutic effects on a range of chronic diseases, including neurological, digestive, respiratory and bone-related disorders during in vitro and vivo experiments, demonstrating the great potential of Rosavin as a therapeutic drug for diseases. This paper gives a comprehensive and insightful overview of Rosavin, focusing on its extraction and synthesis, pharmacological activities, progress in disease-treatment research and formulation studies, providing a reference for the production and preparation, further clinical research and applications of Rosavin in the future.

1. Introduction

Rhodiola rosea L. (RRL), which belongs to a perennial herbaceous plant of the family Crassulaceae, is a kind of traditional precious herbal medicine and has been used as an adaptogen, supplement, medicine or functional food for a long time in Asia and Europe. The active ingredients and effects of RRL have attracted a lot of attention and research. Rosavin is one of the main active and characteristic components of RRL. It was first isolated from RRL root by Russian botanists and chemists, who named the compound “Rosavin” because of a rose-like aroma, and found it had antifatigue and antistress effects. In recent years, with the gradual deepening of the research on its pharmacological actions and its effects on diseases, Rosavin has demonstrated a variety of biological activities and broad prospects for clinical application.
Searches in major databases (PubMed and CNKI) for a review on Rosavin were not successful. This situation suggests that it would be of considerable value to provide a brief overview of Rosavin and its biomedical activities as well as applications. This paper systematically reviews Rosavin’s sources, pharmacological activities, therapeutic effects and mechanisms on related diseases and formulation studies based on national and international literature research.

2. Botanical Origin and Molecular Structure of Rosavin

RRL, commonly known as Golden Root or Arctic Root, is a perennial herb of the genus Rhodiola L. in the family Crassulaceae. There are about 90 species of Rhodiola L., but only about 20 of them have medicinal value, the most important of which are R. crenulate, R. kirilowii, R. cretinii subsp., R. quadrifida schrenk, R. sacra, etc., and RRL is the most widely used of them. RRL is mainly distributed in northwestern regions of China, Northern Europe to Russia, Mongolia, Korea and Japan [1]. The plant grows in the mountains or cliffs at an altitude of 1800–2700 m in high and cold nonpolluted zones. Because its growth environment is harsh, it has strong vitality and special adaptability. Modern pharmacological studies have revealed that RRL has a variety of biological activities, such as antioxidant [2], antifatigue [3], anti-inflammatory [4,5], antidepressant [6] and antitumor [7] effects.
RRL contains a variety of active ingredients. More than one hundred compounds have been extracted from it, including volatile substances, alcohol glycosides and cyanogenic glycosides, phenylethanol and phenylpropanol compounds, flavonoids, tannin and proanthocyanidin constituents, etc. Phenylethanol and phenylpropanol compounds are considered the representative chemical constituents of RRL [8]. The phenylethanol analog Salidroside and the phenylpropanol analog Rosavin are the main active components. The phenylpropanol analogs include Rosavin, Rosarin and Rosin, which are collectively referred to as rosavins. Other species of Rhodiola L. do not contain rosavins or have very low levels, and therefore rosavins are considered to be the characteristic constituents of RRL [9].
The three compounds of rosavins have similar chemical structures, among which Rosavin and Rosarin have the same relative molecular weight. Their chemical structures are both based on Rosin (Figure 1): Rosavin introduces a pyran ring substituted with a hydroxyl group at the 2,3,4 positions at the primary hydroxyl position of the pyran ring in the structure of Rosin. In the case of Rosarin, a 2,3-dihydroxyfuran structure with a hydroxymethyl substitution at the four position is introduced in the same position. In the extract of RRL, Rosavin is the most abundant component among the three compounds of rosavins, and it is also the main active ingredient of RRL. The study of Rosavin is of great significance for the development and utilization of RRL.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the three compounds of rosavins: Rosin, Rosavin and Rosarin.

3. Extraction and Synthesis of Rosavin

3.1. Extraction and Isolation of Rosavin

As the main active ingredient and characteristic component of RRL, the traditional way to obtain Rosavin is to extract it from the underground rhizome of RRL. For this reason, a variety of methods have been developed for the rapid identification and detection of Rosavin in RRL extracts, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [10], HPLC tandem mass spectrometry (MS) [11] and HPLC using a fused-core column [12], which provide a basis for evaluating the quality of RRL extracts.
The content of Rosavin in different RRL species varies widely, and its level depends on a variety of factors, such as the plant source [13], plant harvest time [14], plant year [15], etc. Wang S. et al. used HPLC to detect the content of Rosavin in different species of Rhodiola L. and found that Rosavin was present in five different origins of RRL plants in China, with the content ranging from 0.08% to 0.6%. In contrast, Rosavin was absent in several sources of R. crenulata, R. cretinii subsp. and R. kirilowii [13].
Different extraction methods significantly affect the content of Rosavin in RRL extracts. The traditional methods mostly used water or organic extracts and combined them with auxiliary techniques such as high pressure and microwave to extract Rosavin [16,17,18]. Kosakowska O. et al. found that ethanol extraction can extract more active components from RRL than water extraction. The best results were obtained by using 70–75% ethanol, and the extracted Rosavin content reached 969.71 mg/100 g [19]. In a recent study, Tsvetov N. et al. applied natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) for the first time to extract active ingredients from RRL. The NADES of the choline chloride and tartaric acid combination extraction were the most efficient, and the Rosavin concentration increased with time and reached its maximum of about 1000 μg/mL at 60 min of extraction [20].
The conventional isolation and purification of Rhodiola L. extracts require several steps, such as column chromatography, medium-pressure liquid chromatography, vacuum column chromatography, semipreparative HPLC or a combination of these techniques. Mudge E. et al. utilized high-speed countercurrent chromatography to isolate Rosavin from the methanolic extract of RRL root with a content of 3.4 mg/13.5 g and 97% purity. The method reduced losses due to irreversible adsorption and reduced solvent usage compared to conventional separation [21]. Ma C. et al. developed flash column chromatography by using ionic liquid as an extraction solvent combined with microwave extraction [22]. In the study, the separation was carried out by using a polyamide column and macroporous resin flash column in series. Finally, the 98.2% purity of Rosavin was obtained with an extraction recovery of 60.6%, providing a new method for the large-scale isolation and purification of Rosavin. To further improve the extraction efficiency of Rosavin, Yang Q. et al. used the technique of macroporous adsorption resin to separate and purify Rosavin in RRL and established a process route. Through the high physical adsorption capacity of the macroporous adsorption resin to achieve an efficient separation effect, the obtained content of Rosavin was increased from 3.00% to 68.76% with a recovery rate of 85.44%, which is helpful for the separation and purification of Rosavin in the actual industrial production [23].

3.2. All-Chemical and Biological Synthesis of Rosavin

Due to the relatively single plant sources and low content of Rosavin, its extraction and isolation are complex and costly. Therefore, its current market price is rather expensive. Given this, the development of relatively simple, efficient and inexpensive chemical or biological synthesis methods for Rosavin is worth investigating. In 2006, Patov S.A. et al. developed a chemical synthesis route of Rosavin based on 1,2,3,4-diisopropylidene- D-glucopyranose and 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-L-arabinopryanosylbromide [24]. In the last two years, Chinese scholars have developed chemical synthesis methods by using safer and cheaper glucose, arabinopyranose and cinnamyl alcohol as starting materials [25,26]. In recent years, some scholars have also attempted to carry out the biosynthesis of Rosavin, and for the first time, natural Rosavin analogs were successfully obtained by using E. coli expression [27,28]. Rosavin’s chemical and biological synthesis schemes are summarized (Figure 2). Each of these approaches have their advantages and disadvantages (Table 1). The development and gradual maturation of the technology of synthesizing Rosavin by chemical or biological methods have provided the possibility of the scale-up production of Rosavin, which lays a good foundation for the further drug development of Rosavin, as well as preventive and therapeutic studies of related diseases and future clinical applications.
Figure 2. Rosavin’s chemical and biological synthesis schemes [24,25,26,27,28].
Table 1. All-chemical or biological synthesis of Rosavin.

4. Pharmacological Activities of Rosavin

4.1. Antioxidant Effect

Oxidative stress is associated with the progression of many diseases, and the imbalance of the intracellular oxidation–reduction system leads to tissue damage, such as the aging of the organism [29]. RRL has good antioxidant activity. The four main components of RRL extract, Salidroside, Tyrosol, Rosavin and Rosarin, inhibited the activities of a superoxide anion radical (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in a dose-dependent manner, with Rosavin being the most potent inhibitor of O2− [30]. In a 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free-radical scavenging assay and Fe2+ reducing-capacity assay, Rosavin also showed good antioxidant activity and a better reducing capacity than Gallic acid, Ethyl gallate and Herbacetin [31]. Hydroxyl radicals are known to be the most harmful free radicals among the reactive oxygen species in the body, capable of killing erythrocytes, degrading DNA, etc. The main active ingredients of RRL, Tyrosol, Salidroside, Rosarin and Rosavin, have a potent hydroxyl radical scavenging ability in descending order [32]. Aging is a degenerative change induced with age, which is thought to be related to the side effects of a large number of free radicals. The antiaging effect can be achieved by the effective scavenging of free radicals. In a rat model of subacute aging induced by an intraperitoneal injection of D-galactose, the Rosavin-treated group showed a dose-dependent reversal of the decline in learning and memory due to aging. It was shown that Rosavin ameliorated D-galactose-induced learning and memory decline in rats, which may be related to the rebound of the blood oxygen level and protection of enzyme activities, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and the reduction in lipid-oxidation-accumulation-products (MDA) production [33]. All of the above studies have shown that Rosavin has a strong antioxidant capacity through the effective scavenging of free radicals.

4.2. Lipid-Lowering Effect

The imbalance between energy intake and expenditure leads to an increase in the body’s fat content. Excessive fat accumulation in the body tends to cause a series of metabolism-related problems. Special natural components are known to reduce lipid absorption and adipogenesis, increase energy expenditure, etc. Verpeut J.L. et al. found that rats in the combined application group of RRL extract (containing 3% Rosavin and 1% Salidroside) and citrus aurantium reduced the weight of visceral fat by 30% compared with rats in the high-fat-diet model group [34]. In the lipolysis and antilipogenesis study, the experimental group containing 3% Rosavin and 1% Salidroside significantly induced higher apoptosis and lipolysis compared to the 3% Salidroside group, significantly reduced triglyceride (TG) adulteration during the maturation of preadipocytes. The expression of the genes involved in adipogenesis, SLC2A4 (solute carrier family 2, member 4) and FGF2 (fibroblast growth factor 2) was significantly decreased. However, the expression of the genes that inhibit adipogenesis, such as GATA3 (GATA binding protein 3), WNT3A (wingless-related MMTV integration site 3A) and WNT10B (wingless-related MMTV integration site 10B), was significantly increased. Mechanistic studies showed that the 3% Rosavin and 1% Salidroside group significantly downregulated the master regulators of adipogenesis, PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, gamma 2) and FABP4 (fatty acid binding protein 4), confirming the lipolytic and antiadipogenic activity of Rosavin [35]. A recent study demonstrated that four consecutive weeks of an intraperitoneal injection of Rosavin significantly reduced serum TG, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in mice fed a high-sucrose and high-fat diet [36]. The aforementioned studies have shown the potential of Rosavin in reducing lipid levels, including visceral fat weight and lipid indices, as well as regulating genes associated with adipogenesis.

4.3. Antifatigue Effect

Fatigue manifests as a decrease in the strength or sensitivity of cells, organs and muscles in response to stress. Adaptogen is a kind of metabolic regulator that helps adapt to the environment and enhances the body’s nonspecific resistance to harmful stimuli and injuries. RRL is a representative plant that is recognized as having plant adaptogens. Its four active components, Salidroside, Rosavin, Syringin and Triandrin, have the most potent adaptogen activity. A single dose of these adaptogens could significantly improve mental and physical performance after 30 min, lasting for at least 4–6 h [37]. In an antifatigue study in mice, Rosavin prolonged forceful swimming time, with significantly higher hepatic glycogen and myoglycogen content and a lower postexercise creatine lactate concentration [38]. Salidroside has been shown to have strong antifatigue activity [39]. Comparing Rosavin with the positive control Salidroside, the antifatigue effect of Salidroside was slightly better than that of Rosavin at the same dosage. However, there was no significant difference in the antifatigue effect between the high-concentration Rosavin group (360 mg/kg) and the Salidroside group (180 mg/kg) [38]. The above study demonstrated the antifatigue activity of Rosavin.

4.4. Analgesic Effect

The use of analgesics can effectively relieve the pain caused by most diseases and side effects of clinical treatments. Many active ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine have analgesic activity [40]. RRL ethanol extract (containing 2.7% Rosavin and 2.5% Salidroside) in combination with B vitamins significantly reduced formalin-injection-induced pain in mice synergistically. The analgesic effect of the RRL extract was inhibited by blocking NO synthesis, cGMP synthesis or K+ channels, indicating that the analgesic activity of the extract is related to the NO/cGMP/K+ pathway. This antinociceptive effect could be reverted in the presence of antagonists of the 5-HT1A, GABA/BDZs and opioid receptors, suggesting that the action mechanism of the analgesic activity of the extract involved the 5-HT1A and GABA/BDZs receptors [41]. Oxaliplatin is currently the first-line treatment drug for advanced colorectal cancer, but the pain caused by an oxaliplatin injection is its typical adverse reaction. Mice developed cold pain in 3–5 days after a single oxaliplatin injection, which was significantly ameliorated by Rosavin. Moreover, the duration of its analgesic effect was positively correlated with the dosage of Rosavin. The analgesic activity of Rosavin disappeared after the 5-HT depletion by the pretreatment. Further studies found that 5-HT1A receptor antagonists blocked the analgesic activity of Rosavin, confirming that Rosavin attenuates oxaliplatin-induced cold pain through the activation of 5-HT1A receptors [42]. Those studies have shown that Rosavin has strong analgesic activity and the mechanism is related to 5-HT1A.

4.5. Antiradiation Effect

Radiation-protective drugs are widely used in radiation environments. But conventional antiradiation agents, such as amifostine and nilestriol, have possible drawbacks including narrow safety windows, high toxicity and poor stability [43]. It is expected that scholars will search for novel antiradiation drugs from nontoxic and low-toxic natural components. After the irradiation of AHH-1 (human peripheral blood B lymphocytes) using 10 Gy γ-rays, Isoquercitrin, Salidroside, Rosavin, Rosarin and Arbutin were all able to significantly increase the proliferative activity of AHH-1 cells after radiation damage, and Rosavin showed the strongest antiradiation activity. A total of 25 μM Rosavin increased cell viability from approximately 60% to 90% after 10 Gy γ-rays irradiation [44]. After the irradiation of IEC-6 (rat small intestinal crypt epithelial cells), the proliferation activity of the cells was enhanced to different degrees after the intervention of Salidroside, Rosavin and Arbutin, among which 12.5 μM Rosavin had the most potent protective effect, increasing the cell viability to 85.56 ± 4.93% [45]. The above studies demonstrated the strong radiation resistance of Rosavin in cells.

4.6. Antitumor Effect

Neovascularization in tumors is necessary for tumor growth and metastasis formation. The daily administration of 8 μg of Rosavin significantly reduced neovascularization in mice after the transplantation of L-1 sarcoma cells [46]. Recent studies have shown that Rosavin inhibits cell proliferation, clone formation, migration and invasion and promotes apoptosis and G0/G1 phase blockage. It decreases p-ERK/ERK (extracellular regulated protein kinases) and p-MEK/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) protein levels, suggesting that Rosavin exerts its anti-small-cell-lung-cancer effects by inhibiting the MAPK/ERK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular regulated protein kinases) pathway [47]. These results suggest that Rosavin has potential antitumor effects and is expected to be a novel anticancer drug.

4.7. Immunomodulation Effect

Chen W. et al. investigated the protective effects of the main components of RRL on the immune system of mice, including Salidroside, Tyrosol and Rosavin. They found that the different active ingredients acted on different immune target cells. Rosavin has a significant proliferative effect on B lymphocytes and promotes the transformation of quiescent T lymphocytes to lymphoblasts while increasing the phagocytosis of monocytes, indicating the extensive immune activity of Rosavin [48]. It has also been shown that the main active components of RRL can alter the growth of human Jurkat T cells and apoptosis of mouse T cells, as well as the expression of surface markers and ERK phosphorylation. The strongest activity was observed for Rosavin and Rosarin, with an IC50 of 68 μM and 74 μM, respectively. Mechanistic studies have shown that Rosavin inhibits the upregulation of a TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) after T lymphocyte stimulation through the ERK pathway, whereas Rosarin shows the opposite effect [49]. The modulatory effect of Rosavin on immune cells suggests its potential in regulating autoimmune diseases.
The above pharmacological activities and detailed functional roles of Rosavin were summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Various pharmacological activities of Rosavin.

6. Drug Metabolism and Formulation Studies of Rosavin

Rosavin is a hydrophilic compound with high water solubility and a low oil–water partition coefficient. Currently, researchers mostly use ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) [68] and UPLC-MS/MS methods [69] for pharmacokinetic assays of Rosavin. The results of the plasma assay after a single administration of Rosavin to rats showed that the blood concentration of Rosavin declined rapidly after an intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg to rats with a half-life of 5.5 ± 1.3 h, whereas the concentration of Rosavin in the plasma increased gradually after a gavage administration of 20 mg/kg to rats and reached a maximum of 324.3 ± 66.9 ng/mL with a half-life of 11.6 ± 2.7 h. Compared with intravenous administration, gavage administration has a longer drug-elimination time. But the oral bioavailability (F) of Rosavin was only 2.5 ± 0.2%, which may be related to the malabsorption caused by the hydrolysis of Rosavin to glycosidic elements in the acidic environment of the digestive tract and the first-pass metabolism of the drug [68,69].
In the current studies, the gavage dosage of Rosavin is approximately 50–200 mg/kg [45,62], with a maximum dosage of 360 mg/kg [38]; most intraperitoneal doses are within 10 mg/kg [56,68], with a maximum dosage of 30 mg/kg [36]. However, there are no studies to identify Rosavin’s toxicity, and the systemic toxicological analysis in the liver and kidney after using Rosavin is still unclear.
To improve the oral effect of Rosavin, a research team improved the fast-disintegrating oral tablets of the compound Rosavin based on the traditional dosage form, using Rosavin as the main ingredient with excipients such as an ice-tablet β-cyclodextrin inclusion, lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose and crosslinked povidone. The compound tablets achieved rapid disintegration and a rapid onset of action under no water or a small amount of water [70]. In a further study, Rosavin tablets were prepared by using Rosavin as the main drug plus hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, maltol sugar powder, microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate and were applied to the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, as well as in combination with anticancer drugs to reduce the toxicity of anticancer drugs, etc. [71]. Pharmacodynamic studies showed that the Rosavin tablets could significantly prolong the weight-loaded swimming time and survival time under normobaric hypoxia in mice and improve the ability of mice to withstand high and low temperatures. The mice in the high-dose group (0.8 g/kg) experienced a significant inhibition of the tumor-growth ratio of the H22 hepatocellular carcinoma transplantation tumor. Rosavin tablets could enhance the phagocytosis function of the reticuloendothelial system and increase the percentage of peripheral blood T-lymphocytes in the H22 tumor-bearing mice, showing the effects of the Rosavin tablets in terms of their antifatigue, antistress and antitumor effects and the enhancement of immune function [71].

7. Summary and Outlook

As a unique component of RRL, Rosavin is a crucial active ingredient in the Rhodiola L. plant. Recent studies have highlighted Rosavin’s powerful multibioactivities, including its antioxidant, lipid-lowering, antifatigue, analgesic, antiradiation, antitumor and immunomodulatory effects. However, its mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, which has encouraged more interest in further research. Existing animal model experiments have confirmed that Rosavin has significant therapeutic effects on a range of diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, radioactive intestinal injuries, pulmonary fibrosis and osteoarthritis. These investigations show the great potential of Rosavin as a therapeutic drug for diseases and provide some basis for the future clinical treatment of related diseases.
With the deepening of the research and the emergence of broad application prospects, the demand for Rosavin is expanding. Traditional plant extraction and isolation are no longer sufficient for research and application needs. So, all-chemical and biological synthesis pathways of Rosavin have been gradually developed, which has provided the possibility of scaling up the industrial production of Rosavin.
Rosavin’s investigations have shown promising effects, but several shortcomings need to be addressed. Some of the research directions of interest are as follows. Firstly, biosynthesis should be improved to achieve large-scale production. Industrial synthetic production will be the primary source of Rosavin in the future, and biosynthesis is more favorable due to the toxicity of chemical synthesis. However, the current biosynthesis yields Rosavin analogs. Further research must clarify the key enzyme in it and improve the synthetic route to obtain Rosavin. Future research is expected to achieve a green, nontoxic and high-yield total biosynthesis, which will greatly reduce the price of Rosavin and promote its pharmaceutical formulations and research related to disease treatments. Secondly, the preparation and formulations of Rosavin are still relatively scarce. The current oral bioavailability of Rosavin is only 4.7% [70], which may be related to its poor small intestinal membrane permeability and first-pass metabolism. How to formulate Rosavin so that it can be absorbed and utilized as much as possible is an issue that needs to be investigated by pharmacy scholars, such as preparing it into phospholipid complexes, using liposomes or changing its delivery system. Thirdly, toxicological studies on Rosavin are needed. As of today, related toxicological studies on the liver and kidney after the use of Rosavin are still unclear. Finally, clinical trials are lacking. Most of the studies of Rosavin’s therapeutic effects on diseases are still at the stage of basic research. Some large-scale, well-controlled clinical trials are needed to establish its safety and efficacy.
In summary, future research will focus on the total biosynthesis, preparation research, precise mechanisms of action and the optimal use of Rosavin in various disease therapies and large-scale clinical trials. It is a broad development space worth exploring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y. and S.W.; literature review and resources, L.Z. and P.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W. and Y.F.; writing—review and editing, X.Y. and M.W.; visualization, S.W., J.T. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (number 2018A030310106), National College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (number 202210571027), Scientific and Technological Innovation for Guangdong College Students (number pdjh2023b0236) and Guangdong College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (number S202310571061).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bernatoniene, J.; Jakstas, V.; Kopustinskiene, D.M. Phenolic Compounds of Rhodiola rosea L. as the Potential Alternative Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Polumackanycz, M.; Konieczynski, P.; Orhan, I.E.; Abaci, N.; Viapiana, A. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Anti-Enzymatic Activity of Golden Root (Rhodiola rosea L.) Commercial Samples. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, H.; Liu, C.; Qian, H. Pharmaceutical Potential of High-Altitude Plants for Fatigue-Related Disorders: A Review. Plants 2022, 11, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Masi, F.; Chianese, G.; Hofstetter, R.K.; Cavallaro, A.L.; Riva, A.; Werz, O.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Phytochemical Profile and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of a Commercially Available Rhodiola rosea Root Extract. Fitoterapia 2023, 166, 105439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pu, W.; Zhang, M.; Bai, R.; Sun, L.; Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Song, L.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Y.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Rhodiola rosea L.: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amsterdam, J.D.; Panossian, A.G. Rhodiola rosea L. as a Putative Botanical Antidepressant. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 770–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rong, L.; Li, Z.; Leng, X.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Song, F. Salidroside Induces Apoptosis and Protective Autophagy in Human Gastric Cancer AGS Cells through the PI3K/Akt/MTOR Pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 122, 109726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, Y.; Quan, S.; Zhang, J. Advances in chemical composition, pharmacological action and clinical application of Rhodiola rosea L. J. Logist. Univ. PAP (Med. Sci.) 2020, 29, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Pham, V.; Bui, M.; Song, L.; Wu, C.; Walia, A.; Uchio, E.; Smith-Liu, F.; Zi, X. Rhodiola rosea L.: An Herb with Anti-Stress, Anti-Aging, and Immunostimulating Properties for Cancer Chemoprevention. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017, 3, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y. Determination of Rosavin in Rhodiola rosea by HPLC. China Pharm. 2009, 18, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodin, I.A.; Stavrianidi, A.N.; Braun, A.V.; Shpigun, O.A.; Popik, M.V. Simultaneous Determination of Salidroside, Rosavin, and Rosarin in Extracts from Rhodiola rosea by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection. J. Anal. Chem. 2012, 67, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zou, L.; Wang, Z.; Hu, H.; Yang, M.; Bao, X.; Wang, A. Rapid determination of salidroside, tyrosol, and rosavin in Rhodiola rosea extract by HPLC using a fused-core column. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2011, 42, 1334–1337. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Wu, J. Determination of Rosavin and Salidroside in the rhizomes of four species of Rhodiola L. West China J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 443–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, L.; He, C.; Sun, P. Quantitative analysis of active ingredient content of Rhodiola rosea at different harvest months. Int. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2022, 44, 1023–1027. [Google Scholar]
  15. Elameen, A.; Kosman, V.M.; Thomsen, M.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Shikov, A.N. Variability of Major Phenyletanes and Phenylpropanoids in 16-Year-Old Rhodiola rosea L. Clones in Norway. Molecules 2020, 25, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.; Bi, H.; Liu, C. Extraction of Bio-Active Components from Rhodiola Sachalinensis under Ultrahigh Hydrostatic Pressure. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 57, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, N. Simultaneous Determination of Salidroside and Tyrosol in Extracts of Rhodiola L. by Microwave Assisted Extraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2007, 45, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Bi, H.; Wang, C. Extraction of Flavonoids from Rhodiola sachlinesis A. Bor by UPE and the Antioxidant Activity of Its Extract. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kosakowska, O.; Bączek, K.; Przybył, J.L.; Pióro-Jabrucka, E.; Czupa, W.; Synowiec, A.; Gniewosz, M.; Costa, R.; Mondello, L.; Węglarz, Z. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Roseroot (Rhodiola rosea L.) Dry Extracts. Molecules 2018, 23, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsvetov, N.; Paukshta, O.; Fokina, N.; Volodina, N.; Samarov, A. Application of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Extraction of Bioactive Components from Rhodiola rosea (L.). Molecules 2023, 28, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mudge, E.; Lopes-Lutz, D.; Brown, P.N.; Schieber, A. Purification of Phenylalkanoids and Monoterpene Glycosides from Rhodiola rosea L. Roots by High-Speed Counter-Current Chromatography: Phytochemicals from Rhodiola rosea L. Roots. Phytochem. Anal. 2013, 24, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, C.; Wang, H.; Gu, X.; Hu, L. Large-Scale Preparative Isolation of Rosavin from Rhodiola rosea via Ion Liquids MAE and Subsequent Flash Adsorption Chromatography. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1821–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Q.; Ge, J. The isolation and purification of Rosavin by the macroporous adsorption resin. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 79–84+91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patov, S.A.; Punegov, V.V.; Kuchin, A.V. Synthesis of the Rhodiola rosea Glycoside Rosavin. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2006, 42, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhong, T.; Hu, Y.; Su, J.; Yang, S.; He, B.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis Research of Active Constituent Rosavin from Rhodiola rosea. Mod. Chin. Med. 2021, 23, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, H.; Li, A.; Zhao, Q.; Xu, W. Synthesis of the active ingredient rosavin of Rhodiola rosea. J. Pharm. Pract. 2021, 39, 130–133. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bi, H.; Wang, S.; Zhou, W.; Zhuang, Y.; Liu, T. Producing Gram-Scale Unnatural Rosavin Analogues from Glucose by Engineered Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 1931–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bi, H.; Qu, G.; Wang, S.; Zhuang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Liu, T.; Ma, Y. Biosynthesis of a Rosavin Natural Product in Escherichia Coli by Glycosyltransferase Rational Design and Artificial Pathway Construction. Metab. Eng. 2022, 69, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aebisher, D.; Cichonski, J.; Szpyrka, E.; Masjonis, S.; Chrzanowski, G. Essential Oils of Seven Lamiaceae Plants and Their Antioxidant Capacity. Molecules 2021, 26, 3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, S.; Lee, F.; Kuo, T.; Yang, J.; Chien, C. Attenuation of Long-Term Rhodiola rosea Supplementation on Exhaustive Swimming-Evoked Oxidative Stress in the Rat. Chin. J. Physiol. 2009, 52, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, L.; Peng, L.; Fu, J.; Zou, L.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J. Phytochemical, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Rhodiola Crenulata. Molecules 2020, 25, 3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, T.; Shi, N.; Chen, G.; Guo, H.; Wu, J. Comparison of in vitro antioxidant effects of eight components in Rhodiola rosea L. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. 2012, 28, 1224–1228. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tan, H.; Shi, C.; Lu, J. Preliminary Study on Protection Mechanism of Rosavin in Learning and Memory Ability in Subacute Aged Rats Induced by D-Galactose. China Pharm. 2015, 18, 1729–1732. [Google Scholar]
  34. Verpeut, J.L.; Walters, A.L.; Bello, N.T. Citrus Aurantium and Rhodiola rosea in Combination Reduce Visceral White Adipose Tissue and Increase Hypothalamic Norepinephrine in a Rat Model of Diet-Induced Obesity. Nutr. Res. 2013, 33, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pomari, E.; Stefanon, B.; Colitti, M. Effects of Two Different Rhodiola rosea Extracts on Primary Human Visceral Adipocytes. Molecules 2015, 20, 8409–8428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Albadawy, R.; Hasanin, A.H.; Agwa, S.H.A.; Hamady, S.; Aboul-Ela, Y.M.; Raafat, M.H.; Kamar, S.S.; Othman, M.; Yahia, Y.A.; Matboli, M. Rosavin Ameliorates Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis in the NASH Rat Model via Targeting Hepatic Cell Death. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Panossian, A.; Wagner, H. Stimulating Effect of Adaptogens: An Overview with Particular Reference to Their Efficacy Following Single Dose Administration. Phytother. Res. 2005, 19, 819–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, H. Anti-fatigue effects of rosavin extracted from Rhodiola rosea L. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2013, 34, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Xie, L.; Long, J.; Xie, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, X. Salidroside: A Review of Its Recent Advances in Synthetic Pathways and Pharmacological Properties. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2021, 339, 109268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Bai, F.; Cong, C.; Chen, B.; Xie, W.; Li, S.; Liu, Q.; Chen, C.; Wu, Y. Effects of Ligustrazine on the Expression of Neurotransmitters in the Trigeminal Ganglion of a Rat Migraine Model. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Montiel-Ruiz, R.M.; González-Trujano, M.E.; Déciga-Campos, M. Synergistic Interactions between the Antinociceptive Effect of Rhodiola rosea Extract and B Vitamins in the Mouse Formalin Test. Phytomedicine 2013, 20, 1280–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, D.; Park, S.; Lee, K.; Jang, D.S.; Kim, S.K. 5-HT 1A Receptors Mediate the Analgesic Effect of Rosavin in a Mouse Model of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021, 25, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maurya, D.K.; Devasagayam, T.P.A.; Nair, C.K.K. Some Novel Approaches for Radioprotection and the Beneficial Effect of Natural Products. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 44, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Ma, T.; Wu, J.; Shi, N.; Gong, Z. Screening for Radioprotective Components of Glycosides and Alcohols from Rhodiola in vitro. Pharm. J. Chin. People’s Lib. Army 2013, 29, 203–205+209. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhou, W.; Chen, K.; Lu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, Y.; Zhuo, Z.; Guo, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; et al. The Protective Effect of Rosavin from Rhodiola rosea on Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Skopiñska-Ró, E.; Hartwich, G.; Siwicki, A.K.; Wasiutyñski, A.; Sommer, E.; Bany, J.; Skurzak, H. The Influence of Rhodiola rosea Extracts and Rosavin on Cutaneous Angiogenesis Induced in Mice after Grafting of Syngeneic Tumor Cells. Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 33, 102. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, R.; Jiang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Lv, Y.; Wang, G. Rosavin Exerts an Antitumor Role and Inactivates the MAPK/ERK Pathway in Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma in Vitro. Acta Pharm. 2023, 73, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, W.; Ma, X.; Fan, W.; Zhou, F. Major Efficacy Component of Rhodiola Stimulate Proliferation and Transformation on Mouse Immune Cells. Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm. 2016, 33, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marchev, A.S.; Dimitrova, P.; Koycheva, I.K.; Georgiev, M.I. Altered Expression of TRAIL on Mouse T Cells via ERK Phosphorylation by Rhodiola rosea L. and Its Marker Compounds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 108, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liang, L.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Studies on Alzheimer’s disease of Rosavin based on Caenorhabditis elegans dementia model (CL4176). Mod. Chin. Med. 2022, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Shi, J. Research progress of the anti-inflammatory mechanism of Rosavin in Alzheimer’s disease. Liaoning J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2023, 239–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borgonetti, V.; Governa, P.; Biagi, M.; Dalia, P.; Corsi, L. Rhodiola rosea L. Modulates Inflammatory Processes in a CRH-Activated BV2 Cell Model. Phytomedicine 2020, 68, 153143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Darbinyan, V.; Aslanyan, G.; Amroyan, E.; Gabrielyan, E.; Malmström, C.; Panossian, A. Clinical Trial of Rhodiola rosea L. Extract SHR-5 in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Depression. Nord. J. Psychiatry 2007, 61, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Perfumi, M.; Mattioli, L. Adaptogenic and Central Nervous System Effects of Single Doses of 3% Rosavin and 1% Salidroside Rhodiola rosea L. Extract in Mice. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zou, H.; Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Tang, L.; Wang, C. Rosavin Protects the Blood–Brain Barrier against Ischemia/Reperfusion-induced Cerebral Injury by Regulating MAPK-mediated MMPs Pathway. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2023, 50, 664–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.-Z. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Y.; Tao, H.; Huang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, M.; Shen, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Du, F.; et al. The Dietary Supplement Rhodiola crenulata Extract Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in Mice through Anti-Inflammation, Mediating Gut Barrier Integrity and Reshaping the Gut Microbiome. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3142–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Park, J.-S.; Choi, J.; Kwon, J.Y.; Jung, K.-A.; Yang, C.W.; Park, S.-H.; Cho, M.-L. A Probiotic Complex, Rosavin, Zinc, and Prebiotics Ameliorate Intestinal Inflammation in an Acute Colitis Mouse Model. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Powell, E.E.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Rinella, M. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 2212–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Spagnolo, P.; Kropski, J.A.; Jones, M.G.; Lee, J.S.; Rossi, G.; Karampitsakos, T.; Maher, T.M.; Tzouvelekis, A.; Ryerson, C.J. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Disease Mechanisms and Drug Development. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 222, 107798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xin, X.; Yao, D.; Zhang, K.; Han, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Huang, J.; Wang, J. Protective Effects of Rosavin on Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis via Suppressing Fibrotic and Inflammatory Signaling Pathways in Mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 115, 108870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Jia, N.; Shen, Z.; Huang, D.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Pei, C.; Shi, S.; He, Y.; et al. Pretreatment with Rosavin Attenuates PM2.5-induced Lung Injury in Rats through Antiferroptosis via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway. Phytother. Res. 2023, 37, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gao, T.; Li, J.; Shi, L.; Hu, B. Rosavin Inhibits Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Formation to Ameliorate Sepsis-Induced Lung Injury by Regulating the MAPK Pathway. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2023, 51, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abramoff, B.; Caldera, F.E. Osteoarthritis. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 104, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kwon, J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jhun, J.; Choi, J.; Jung, K.; Cho, K.H.; Kim, S.J.; Yang, C.W.; Park, S.-H.; Cho, M.-L. The Combination of Probiotic Complex, Rosavin, and Zinc Improves Pain and Cartilage Destruction in an Osteoarthritis Rat Model. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Drake, M.T.; Clarke, B.L.; Oursler, M.J.; Khosla, S. Cathepsin K Inhibitors for Osteoporosis: Biology, Potential Clinical Utility, and Lessons Learned. Endocr. Rev. 2017, 38, 325–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, W.; Zhang, W.; Huo, L.; Chai, Y.; Liu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Yu, C. Rosavin Suppresses Osteoclastogenesis in Vivo and in Vitro by Blocking the Nuclear Factor Kappa-Light-Chain-Enhancer of Activated B Cells (NF-ΚB) and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Signaling Pathways. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, D.; Sun, H.; Shen, J.; Igor, L.P.; Zheng, X.; Hu, S.; Xiang, Z. A Simple and Rapid UPLC Method for the Determination of Rosavin in Rat Plasma and Its Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2016, 54, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, M.; Hu, Z.; Fang, B.; Bao, X.; Xiang, Z.; Wang, H. Pharmacokinetic Study of Rosavin in Rat Plasma with Ultra Performance LC–MS/MS after Intravenous and Gavage Administration. Bioanalysis 2019, 11, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yao, M.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, W.; Ma, N.; Dou, F.; Tang, H. Preparation Technology of Borneol-β-cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex in Compound Laosawei Fast Disintegrating Oral Tablets. China Pharm. 2013, 16, 212–214. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yao, M.; Gao, K.; Ma, T.; Li, W.; Song, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wen, A. Quality standards and pharmacological effect of Laosawei tablets. Cent. South Pharm. 2019, 17, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.