Next Article in Journal
Beckmann Rearrangement of Ketoxime Catalyzed by N-methyl-imidazolium Hydrosulfate
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Use of a General Solid-Phase Intermediate to Biomimetic Scaffolds and Peptide Condensations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules23071763
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome Identification of B-BOX Gene Family Members in Seven Rosaceae Species and Their Expression Analysis in Response to Flower Induction in Malus domestica

by
Abdullah Shalmani
1,2,
Sheng Fan
1,
Peng Jia
1,
Guofang Li
1,
Izhar Muhammad
2,
Youmei Li
1,
Rahat Sharif
1,
Feng Dong
1,
Xiya Zuo
1,
Ke Li
1,
Kun-Ming Chen
2,* and
Mingyu Han
1,*
1
College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(7), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071763
Submission received: 29 June 2018 / Revised: 13 July 2018 / Accepted: 15 July 2018 / Published: 18 July 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
BBX proteins play important roles in regulating plant growth and development including photomorphogenesis, photoperiodic regulation of flowering, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. At present, the genomes of seven Rosaceae fruit species have been fully sequenced. However, little is known about the BBX gene family and their evolutionary history in these Rosaceae species. Therefore, in this study total, 212 BBX genes were investigated from seven Rosaceae species (67 from Malus × domestica, 40 from Pyrus communis, 22 from Rosa Chinesis, 20 from Prunus persica, 21 from Fragaria vesca, 22 from Prunus avium, and 20 from Rubus occidentalis). The chemical properties, gene structures, and evolutionary relationships of the BBX genes were also studied. All the BBX genes were grouped into six subfamilies on the basis of their phylogenetic relationships and structural features. Analysis of gene structure, segmental and tandem duplication, gene phylogeny, and tissue-specific expression with the ArrayExpress database showed their diversification in function, quantity, and structure. The expression profiles of 19 MdBBX genes in different tissues were evaluated through qRT-PCR. These genes showed distinct transcription level among the tested tissues (bud, flower, fruit, stem, and leaf). Moreover, expression patterns of 19 MdBBX genes were examined during flowering induction time under flowering-related hormones and treatments (GA3, 6-BA, and sucrose). The expressions of the candidates BBX genes were affected and showed diverse expression profile. Furthermore, changes in response to these flowering-related hormones and treatment specifying their potential involvement in flowering induction. Based on these findings, BBX genes could be used as potential genetic markers for the growth and development of plants particularly in the area of functional analysis, and their involvement in flower induction in fruit plants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zinc finger transcription factors are one of the most important families in the plant. They regulate different plant growth and developmental processes. Zinc finger transcription factors are classified into several subfamilies based on the structural and functional features of their individual members. Among them, B-box proteins drew more attention in the recent years because of their multiple functions. The BBX proteins are a group of zinc-finger transcription factors that contain one or two conserved domains near to N-terminus and some have additional CCT (CONSTANS, CO-like, and TIMING Of CAB1) domain near to C-terminal. The B-box domains are divided into two class, known as B-box1 (B1) and B-box2 (B2). Two B-box domains are recognized on their consensus sequence and the distance between the zinc-binding residues [1]. The segmental duplication and deletion events during evolution resulted in the differences of the consensus sequences in two B-BOX domains [2,3]. The highly conserved CCT domain is comprised of 42–43 amino acids, and it is important for the regulation of functional transcription and nuclear protein transport [4,5]. BBXs are important regulatory factors that control various developmental and growth process of plants including flowering, photomorphogenesis, shade avoidance, and response to biotic and abiotic stresses [6].
The BBX transcription factor promotes light and circadian signaling in Arabidopsis [1]. CONSTANS (known as BBX1) was the first investigated BBX protein in Arabidopsis which enhance the flowering. It regulates the transcription of the FT (Flowering Locus T) gene encoding a florigen signal, FT, which promotes flower differentiation under long-day condition [7,8]. BBX2 and BBX3 have less effect on flowering but overexpression of BBX2 gene reduced the duration of two specific circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis [9]. Recent studies found that AtBBX4 (COL3, CONSTANS like 3) and AtBBX7 (COL9) are involved in negative regulation of CO (CONSTANS) and FT genes expressions, respectively [6,10,11]. AtBBX6 promotes the expression of FT and its known as a short day-specific inducer of flowering [12]. Mutation in the eip6 (BBX32) gene showed earlier flowering and enhanced the expression of flowering time and floral organ identity genes in Arabidopsis, while overexpression of mutant EMF1-Interacting Protein 6 (BBX32) display late flowering [13]. The rice CO orthologous, Hd1 (OsBBX18), are the BBX genes possessing two B-box motifs and one additional CCT domain. The function of Hd1 is parallel in the promoting of flowering time but regulates flowering during SD (short day) conditions rather than LD (long day) conditions [14]. In Oryza sativa, OsCO3 containing a single B-box and CCT domain controls photoperiodic flowering [15]. The overexpression of OsCO3 delays flowering under SD conditions in rice but does not change the flowering time in Arabidopsis. OsCLO4 represses flowering under SD and LD conditions in rice [16,17]. BBX also plays a vital role in the regulation of flowering in other plants such as barley (Hordeum vulgare), beetroot (Beta vulgaris), chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium), and grape [8,15,16,17].
BBX genes are involved in mitigating abiotic stresses. The salt tolerance protein (STO, AtBBX24) enhances the growth of roots under a highly saline condition in Arabidopsis [18], and was also found to trigger the salt tolerance activities in yeast cells. The salt tolerance proteins (STO) inoculate with CLONE EIGHTY-ONE/RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 (CEO/RCD1) [19,20], which negatively regulates a wide range of stress-related genes [21]. AtBBX18 act as negative regulator both in photomorphogenesis and thermotolerance in Arabidopsis [22]. In Chrysanthemum, CmBBX24 performed a dual function, delaying flowering and also increased cold and drought tolerance in the plant [8]. Twenty-nine out of 30 rice BBX genes possess at least one stress-responsive cis-element (ARE, Wbox, GC-motif, Box-W1, HSE, and MBS), showing that these genes may express during biotic and abiotic stress [23]. Apple is a dominant fruit species cultivated in the temperate regions of the world. “Fuji” (Malus domestica Borkh.) is one of the most popular cultivars of apple, and it accounts for 65% planting areas in China. However, the development of the apple industry in China has enormously affected by long juvenile stage before flowering and fruiting and the poor quality of ‘Fuji’ flower buds. Furthermore, the flower initiation and flowering in many fruiting plants including apple, peach, and pears [24] occur in separate growing seasons. Thus, the study of these molecular regulatory aspects of flower induction in apple is crucial to understand and solve flowering associated complications.
Flower induction is affected by environmental and internal factors [25,26,27]. Sugar and hormones are involved in flower induction [28,29]. Among hormones, GA is the most important hormone for regulating flower induction, and the GA pathway was identified as one of the key flowering pathways [25,28,29,30]. 6-BA and sucrose promote flower bud differentiation and play a vital role in flowering induction [26,28]. In the apple genome, several flowering-related genes families have been investigated such as SPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN), IDD (INDETERMINATE DOMAIN genes), and MADS-box (DNA-binding MADS domain) [31,32]. However, little is known about the involvement of BBX genes and their role in flower induction in apple. Recently the apple genome has been sequenced [33] which made it possible to evaluate the structure, function, and evolution of the BBX gene family and their response to flower induction.
No comprehensive study of BBX genes in Rosaceae has been reported so far. Although, the BBX gene family has been already reported in apple and pear [34,35], we found more BBX homologs in apple and pear than previous works. Thus, we have performed a systematic study to analyze the BBX gene family and their role in flowering induction in apple. In the present study, we investigated the gene structure, phylogenetic relationships, BBX genes family, and their expression patterns under various flowering affecting treatments and hormones in apple.

2. Results

2.1. The BBX Gene Family Members in Apple

To identify and study the BBX genes in the Rosaceae genome, keyword and BLAST searches with default parameters were performed at SGN, NCBI, and other public databases. In the present study, we identified 212 BBX genes after removing repeated sequences and incomplete BBX domains by manual checking (Figure 1). The chemical characterization and amino acid sequence composition of BBX gene family members in Rosaceae species were predicted using the ExPaSy tool. We revealed detailed information including gene name, chromosome location, length of coding sequences and proteins, instability index, major amino acids, isoelectric point, and the molecular weight of every gene (Tables S1 and S2).
All these BBX genes have diverse length and molecular weights, ranging from 7.74 (lowest) (MdBBX25 and MdBBX65) to 126.05 (highest) (FvBBX11) amino acid residues. Therefore varied isoelectric points and molecular weights were observed among them. The BBX genes encode proteins with the coding sequence of 189–3483 bp. The lowest coding sequence was investigated for MdBBX25 and MdBBX65 (189 bp), followed by MdBBX31 (192 bp), FvBBX17 (210), MdBBX8 (213 bp), and MdBBX66 (237 bp) while the highest number of coding sequences were observed for FvBBX11 (3483bp), 2nd, 3rd, and 4th positions were held by PcBBX36 (3273bp), PcBBX9 (2784 bp), and MdBBX37 (2772 bp), respectively. The lowest isoelectric point (3.33) was observed for MdBBX57, while MdBBX58 showed the highest value of the isoelectric point (9.91). The high number of Rosaceae BBX proteins members is acidic in nature according to the isoelectric point, which is lower than seven. However, the isoelectric point of some BBX protein members (MdBBX2, MdBBX6, MdBBX12, MdBBX16, MdBBX18, MdBBX34, MdBBX35, MdBBX40, MdBBX52, MdBBX58, PcBBX5, PcBBX26, RcBBX7, RcBBX9, RcBBX11, PaBBX12, PaBBX13, PaBBX19, PaBBX20, RoBBX14, RoBBX20, PpBBX8, PpBBX12, FvBBX16, and FvBBX20) were greater than seven, indicating that they are alkaline in nature.
The present study grouped the majority of Rosaceae BBX genes into unstable proteins because the instability index of most of the genes in this family was greater than 40. However, a few BBX genes (MdBBX46, MdBBX47, MdBBX48, MdBBX53, PcBBX9, PcBBX11, PcBBX36, RcBBX9, RcBBX13, RoBBX11, RoBBX15, PpBBX9, FvBBX10, and FvBBX11) exhibiting instability less than 40 were categorized as stable proteins. Serine (S) was the most abundant amino acid found in BBX encoded proteins, followed by Alanine (A) and Leucine (L). The majority of Rosaceae BBX proteins were hydrophilic, as the grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) value was recorded less than 0. However, some BBX members such as MdBBX5, MdBBX66, PcBBX30, RcBBX9, RcBBX13, FvBBX17, and FvBBX20 had grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) value more than 0 which shows hydrophobic properties. The range of aliphatic indexes of these 212 BBX encodes proteins from 42.99 to 100.0 (Table S2).

2.2. Chromosomal Localization, Structure and Multiple Sequence Alignments

We classified the apple (Malus domestica), peach (Prunus persica), black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis) strawberry (Fragaria vesca), sweet cherry (Prunus avium), and Rose (Rosa chinensis) BBX genes on the basis of their location in apple chromosomes for better understanding and consistency. The apple BBX genes were distributed on all chromosomes, except for chromosomes 4 and 15 (Figure 2). The highest number of BBX genes was found on chromosome 13 (9 MdBBX genes). Chromosomes 17 contained 8 MdBBX genes, 7 genes were found on chromosome 9 while chromosome 5 comprised of 6 MdBBX genes. An equal number (4) of MdBBX genes each were located on chromosomes 3, 7, and 16. The remaining MdBBX genes were distributed as 2 genes each (MdBBX11 and MDBBX12) on chromosome 6, 2 genes (MdBBX26 and MdBBX27) on chromosome 11, and two genes (MdBBX38 and MdBBX39) on chromosome 14. Chromosomes 1, 2, 8, 10, and 12 have only one BBX gene.
The BBX genes members were noted on all chromosomes except chromosomes 3 and 6 in the peach genome. Highest numbers of peach BBX genes (7) were detected on chromosomes 1 and 2. The rest of the 13 PpBBX genes were distributed on chromosomes 4, 5, 7, and 8. The black raspberry and strawberry genome comprised of seven haploid numbers of chromosomes, respectively. The distribution of BBX genes on chromosomes was similar in these two species. Chromosome 6 consisted of a maximum number of BBX genes, and there were seven and six BBX genes in each black raspberry and strawberry genome, respectively. Moreover, no BBX gene was found on chromosome 7 in these two fruit plants. Sweet cherry BBX genes were observed on seven chromosomes. Seven BBX members were found on chromosome 3; however, no BBX protein was found on chromosomes 2 or 6. The highest number of BBX members was found on chromosome 2 in the rose genome. While no BBX member was observed on chromosome 1 in rose.
The conserved domains of the BBX proteins were confirmed by Pfam, SMART, Inter Pro Scan, Conserved Domain Database (CDD), NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/), and Scan Prosite databases. The family-specific domains B-BOX1, B-BOX2, and CCT domain, were multiple aligned through DNAMAN software, and the logos were drawn via the Web Logo (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi) online tool (Figure 3). It was previously reported that the CCT domain is the most highly conserved domain among the BBXs proteins [4,5], and a similar pattern was found in the Rosaceae BBX proteins (Figure S1a–c). Moreover, the B-box1 domain was found to be more conserved than B-box2 in the present study, indicating that the deletion process could occur in the B-BOX2 domain. We also found the diverse structure for all the studied proteins based on the conserved domain (Figure S2). Four different types of BBX genes were detected; BBX genes with only one B-box domain, BBX genes with two B-boxes domains, BBX genes with one B-box, and an additional CCT domain, some were found with two B-boxes and an additional CCT domain.

2.3. Phylogenetic and Synteny Analysis

According to our analyses, the unrooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree divided the Rosaceae BBX into 6 subfamilies (Figure 4). Most of the BBX members of subfamily I and II possessed one or two B-BOX domains. However, we found six Rosaceae BBX genes (PcBBX30, RoBBX3, RoBBX5, PpBBX18, RoBBX2, and PpBBX19) containing two B-BOXes and an additional CCT domain, and also four Rosaceae BBX gene (PpBBX9, RoBBX1, PaBBX7, and RoBBX19) owned one B-BOX and additional CCT domain in subfamily I and II. The rest of the Rosaceae BBX genes contained two B-BOXes and an additional CCT domain was clustered into subfamily III and IV. Additionally, we also observed the maximum numbers of BBX genes containing one or two B-BOXes in subfamily III and IV. One B-BOX and additional CCT domain of Rosaceae BBX members were identified in subfamily V and IV. A high number of one B-BOX domain containing BBX genes were clustered into subfamily VI along with one B-BOX and CCT containing genes. Interestingly, the present study noted quite a similar clustering for the Arabidopsis BBX genes (Figure 4). Two-B-BOXes domain possessing AtBBXs were clustered together in subfamily I and II, two B-BOXes and additional CCT domains AtBBXs genes were found in subfamily III and IV, AtBBXs having one B-BOX and CCT domain detected in subfamily V, and one B-BOX domain AtBBXs were identified in subfamily VI.
We performed the tandem duplicated analysis to study the expansion profiles of MdBBX genes in the apple genome (Figure 5). Segmental and tandem duplications are the main events of gene duplication. Eight pairs of MdBBX genes were distributed closely with each other. These genes have a similar intron-exon structure and coding length indicating that these two genes may be tandem duplicated genes. The segmentally duplicated blocks were examined within the genome to evaluate the expansion pattern of all MdBBX proteins. Thirty seven pairs of segmental duplicated genes were found on fourteen different apple chromosomes. However, the chromosomal location of a few genes was unknown among these thirty seven pairs of genes. We generated a comparative syntenic map based on Arabidopsis and apple genomes with Circos to further investigate the evolutionary relationships between AtBBX and MdBBX (Figure 6). Some ortholog genes were found between Arabidopsis and apple chromosomes on the basis of the syntenic map. A total of 61 MdBBX-AtBBX orthologous pairs were located at sixteen duplicated genomic regions between apple and Arabidopsis, suggesting that Apple and Arabidopsis BBX may have a common ancestor. Comparative genomic analysis could predict the function of apple BBX genes based on their Arabidopsis homologs.

2.4. Gene Structure and Motif Analysis

The conservation of gene structure in paralogous genes is sufficient to determine the evolutionary connection between introns in various circumstances. We constructed an exon-intron diagram of the BBX genes according to their genomic and coding sequences (Figure S3). The gene structures of all apple BBX family members were generated with GSDS software. The range of a number of introns was from one to twenty-four (PcBBX36) in this study. However, we found some genes without introns, only comprised of the exon. For example, MdBBX7, MdBBX8, MdBBX9, MdBBX10, MdBBX13, MdBBX16, MdBBX25, MdBBX28, MdBBX34, MdBBX40, MdBBX52, MdBBX61, MdBBX62, and MdBBX65 in apple, FvBBX6, FvBBX16, and FvBBX20 in strawberry, RoBBX17 and RoBBX20 gene members in black raspberry, PcBBX5, PcBBX26, PcBBX27, PcBBX4, and PcBBX19 in pear, RcBBX13 in rose and PpBBX8 and PpBBX12 in peach, respectively. The highest number of introns was observed for PcBBX36 (24), followed by PcBBX9 (20), MdBBX37 (18), and MdBBX11 (16).
The MEME tool was used to find out the motifs present in MdBBX members (Figure S2). MEME analysis identified a total 10 motifs in 67 MdBBX proteins. The Motifs were named 1–10 (Figure S3). We found that motif-2 was the largest motif based on width followed by motif-1 and motif 10. Furthermore, based on sequence analysis of motif, motif-7 was comprised more sequences compared with other nine motifs (Table 1). All the MdBBX proteins consisted of motifs 1 and 2, which suggests that all MdBBX proteins have a highly conserved domain. Motif 6 and 9 were present in five members (MdBBX2, MdBBX45, MdBBX17, MdBBX18, and MdBBX64) of the MdBBX family.

2.5. Tissue-Specific Analysis of MdBBX Expression Using ArrayExpress Data

The expression pattern of genes can be useful to determine their potential role and function. Therefore, we examined the different developmental stages/tissues to study the biological roles of apple BBX genes in the plant growth and development, based on a set of microarray data obtained from ArrayExpress database (E-GEOD-42873) and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The expression data from the microarray analysis of apple BBX are presented in the form of a heatmap, from blue-black-yellow, reflecting the percentage expression (Figure 7). Seven tissues or organs including leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, stems, roots, and seedlings from 10 apple varieties (M67, M74, M20, M14, M49, M74, GD, X8877, and two hybrids), were analyzed. The 67 candidates’ apple BBX genes displayed divergent expression pattern among the tested tissues (Figure 7). However, we found that a maximum number of apple BBX genes members was highly expressed in the flower_M74, fruit_M20_hurvest, leaf_M49, and fruit_M20_100daa. MdBBX1, MdBBX2, MdBBX6, MdBBX10, MdBBX12, MdBBX16, MdBBX28, MdBBX39, MdBBX44, MdBBX45, MdBBX59, MdBBX62, and MdBBX67 were detected with a higher transcript level in all the tested tissues; however the majority number of remaining BBX genes showed lower expression pattern in root, seed, and seedling. The expression pattern of most of the MdBBX genes was similar to each other in the seedling of both varieties (seedling_GD and seedling_X4102) excluding MdBBX19 and MdBBX53 genes. The transcribed levels of the apple BBX members were fairly similar in stem_GD, root_X8877, stem_X8877, and root_GD. Overall, the transcript profiles of the BBX gene family members were high in flower, fruit, and leaf related tissues. The results demonstrated the multiple biological roles of BBX gene family in the plant growth and development.

2.6. Organ-Specific Expression of BBX Genes in Apple

Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out of the different tissues including flower, stem, fruit, leaf, and bud to evaluate the expression pattern of 19 MdBBX genes (Figure 8). The 19 MdBBX genes were selected based on our previous transcription data [26]. The actin gene served as an endogenous control. We found that all the studied genes of apple BBX family showed high expression profiles in bud tissue compared with other four tested tissues except MdBBX1, MdBBX30, MdBBX37, MdBBX38, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, and MdBBX51 (Figure 8). We also observed considerable expression for MdBBX1, MdBBX30, MdBBX37, MdBBX38, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, and MdBBX51 genes in bud but lower level than flower, fruit, stem and leaf tissues. In leaf, MdBBX1, MdBBX30, MdBBX37, MdBBX38, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, MdBBX51, and MdBBX52 exhibited high transcribed level. The transcript levels of the studied apple BBX members were low in flower tissue. Some genes such as MdBBX7, MdBBX20, MdBBX22, MdBBX37, MdBBX43, MdBBX47, and MdBBX52 were detected with moderate transcript level in fruit. The expressions of apple BBX members were less in stem except for MdBBX7, MdBBX37, MdBBX41, and MdBBX42, showed reasonable expression pattern. The results further strengthen the evidence came from the microarray data that BBX gene family control various aspects of the plant during growth and development.

2.7. Expression of BBX Genes in Response to Flowering Affecting Treatments

Previous studies have investigated that exogenous treatment such as GA, 6-BA, and sugar can change the flowering rates. Among them, GA was reported for causing a reduction in the flowering rate, while, 6-BA and sugar enhanced the flowering rates [6,36,37]. Here we used these treatments to determine the expression pattern of 19 MdBBX genes in flowering-related tissues during the flowering stage. These 19 MdBBX genes were selected on the basis of previous transcription data [6]. The MdBBX genes showed diverse expression profile at different time points (Figure 9). The transcript levels of some studied MdBBX genes were high; while some displayed a low level of expression. The transcript levels of the studied BBX members were considerably low at 30 days after GA treatment, but higher than the control (Ck) treatment apart from MdBBX14, MdBBX22, and MdBBX38 genes. At 50 days of GA treatment, the transcription activities of all the BBX gene members were downregulated as compared with the control except MdBBX27, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, and MdBBX51 genes. Based on day to day analysis, we found mixed gene expression for the BBX gene family members. The expression patterns of almost all the BBX genes were similar i.e., upregulated at 30 days, then downregulated at 50 days, and then promoted at 70 days, however, we also found some BBX genes that showed different expression patterns from the rest of the BBX genes. For instance, the transcript level of MdBBX51 was enhanced with the passage of time, and parallel expression level was observed for MdBBX39 at 30 and 50 days after GA inoculation. Altogether, the results noticed that the expression levels of MdBBX genes were high at 30 and 70 days of GA treated buds than normal buds.
In this study, the expressions of 19 MdBBX genes were investigated under the exogenous sugar condition (Figure 9). qRT-PCR was performed of 19 MdBBX gene (MdBBX1, MdBBX7, MdBBX20, MdBBX22, MdBBX26, MdBBX27, MdBBX30, MdBBX37, MdBBX38, MdBBX39, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, MdBBX45, MdBBX47, MdBBX49, MdBBX51, and MdBBX52) to study the effect of exogenous sugar on the expression of MdBBX gene in apple. We noted that the expression of MdBBX2, MdBBX7, MdBBX26, MdBBX27, MdBBX30, MdBBX37, MdBBX39, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, MdBBX45, and MdBBX51 were upregulated at 30 days of sugar treatment, whereas the rest of the BBX members were downregulated compared with control (Ck) treatment. The transcribed levels for MdBBX22, MdBBX26, MdBBX30, MdBBX45, MdBBX47, MdBBX49, and MdBBX52 were upregulated after 50 days of post treatment, but their transcript levels were lower than that of in untreated tissues. At this time point, the transcript level of MdBBX7, MdBBX14, and MdBBX42 members were equivalent with the control treatment. Upregulation was observed for the MdBBX7, MdBBX14, MdBBX30, MdBBX38, MdBBX39, MdBBX41, MdBBX42, MdBBX43, MdBBX45, MdBBX47, MdBBX51, and MdBBX52 genes at 70 days of sugar treatment. Overall, high numbers of BBX genes showed a high transcript level at all the three time points.
To gain a deeper insight into the role of MdBBX genes in hormonal stresses, we investigated the transcript profiles of 19 apple BBX members under 6-BA treatment (Figure 9). The plants were subjected to 6-BA treatment, where all the studied BBX members showed higher transcript levels at 30 days of treatment excluding MdBBX37, MdBBX45, and MdBBX47 genes. The expression of 16 out of 19 BBX genes was lower in treated samples than untreated samples at 50 days under 6-BA treatment. The transcript level of OsBBX27, MdBBX41, and MdBBX51 were higher than the control samples. Moreover, we noticed that the transcribed levels of MdBBX1, MdBBX37, and MdBBX49 genes were lower than the control at 70 days treatment, whereas the expression level of remaining BBX members was promoted at this time point. Altogether, maximum genes were upregulated at 30 days, downregulated at 50 days, and then promoted at 70 days. Quite a similar transcript pattern was observed in both hormones (GA and 6-BA); however, the behaviors of BBX genes were different in sugar compared with GA and 6-BA. The unique inducible expression pattern of the BBX gene family member under hormonal and sugar treatment may indicate the role of BBX gene family in response to multivariate hormones and stresses. However, further studies are required to deeply investigate the particular role of BBX gene family in the plant under different hormones and stresses.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Identification of BBX Gene Family Member

The Arabidopsis BBX gene family has already been investigated. In the present study, all the BBX protein sequences were extracted from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database (http://www. arabidopsis.org) and were used as queries for BLASTP search with default parameters against the corresponding Genome databases. The extracted sequences proteins were manually tested for the BBX domains. All BBX genes were extracted automatically and manually.

3.2. Chromosomal Localization and Gene Duplication

Candidate BBX gene annotations and their chromosomal locations were obtained from the Genomic Database for Rosaceae (http://www.Rosaceaee.org/). The exact location of genes on chromosomes was identified by using MapDraw. The conserved and shared domains for all BBX protein sequences were created by online version 4.9.1 of the Multiple Expectation for Motif Elicitation (MEME) tool (http://meme-suite.org/) [38,39]. BBX exon-intron structure consisting of exon positions and gene length [39] were constructed through online Gene Structure Display Server (http://gsds.cbi.pku. edu.cn).

3.3. Sequence Alignment and Polygenetic Analysis

DNAMAN software (Version 5.2.2, LynnonBiosoft) was used to design the multiple alignments of BBX sequences. Sequence logos were generated through online Weblogo platform (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi). A neighbor-joining method in MEGA 5.10 with complete deletion option was used to construct the p-distance-based phylogenetic tree [40].

3.4. Tandem Duplication and Synteny Analysis

The syntenic blocks were designed from Plant Genome Duplication Database (http://chibba.agtec.uga.edu/duplication/). Circos version 0.63 (http://circos.ca/) was used to construct the diagrams. The physical location of a gene on the chromosome was used to find out the Tandem duplication of MdBBX genes in apple. Genes having an adjacent homologous BBX gene on the same apple chromosome with no more than one intervening gene were considered to be tandemly duplicated.

3.5. Plant Materials and Treatments

Seventy-two uniform 6-year-old ‘Fuji’/T337/Malus robusta Rehd, apple trees were used in this present study. The studied materials were grown at the experimental orchard of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University in Yangling (108°04′ E, 34°16′ N), China. These materials were distributed into four groups: 18 cultivars were sprayed with GA, 18 were treated with 6-BA, 18 were treated with sugar, while 18 were sprayed with water and used as a control. Every group was divided into further three blocks with three replications. The hormonal treatments were carried out with little modification in the study of Zheng et al., 2016 [29]. Briefly, 700 mg L−1 GA3 (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) was sprayed once on a clear morning at 30 DAFB (days after full blooming) (9 May). Additionally, trees were sprayed with 300 mg L−1 6-BA (Sigma) on a clear morning at 30 DAFB (9 May). The sugar treatment involved spraying trees two times with 15,000 mg L−1 and 20,000 mg L−1 sucrose on clear mornings at 30 and 37 DAFB (9 May and 16 May). All treatments involved the whole tree and the treatments were sprayed through hand wand sprayer with low pressure.
The terminal buds on current-year spurs (<5 cm) were collected into liquid nitrogen at 30, 50, and 70 DAFB. Then collected samples were stored at −80 °C to study gene expression.

3.6. Samples Collection

Various organs were collected for the investigation of gene expression in 6-year old Fuji’/T337/Malus robusta Rehd at the end of April 2017. Bud samples were collected along with mature leaves. For RNA extraction, three different samples were taken from three independent experiments for the same tissue and treatment. All the samples were immediately put into liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further study.

3.7. Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

The total RNA from all the samples was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [41]. The samples were run on 2% agarose gels to confirm the total RNA. The RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase to remove the residual genomic DNA. The cDNA was synthesized from all the samples. 1 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis through PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All the primers were designed from apple BBX sequences for real-time PCR using primer 6.0 (Table S3). Each primer pair was tested via standard RT-PCR to check the size specificity of the amplified product by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Real-time PCR was carried out in an iCycleriQ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each reaction consisted of 5 μL SYBR Premix ExTaq (Takara, Kyoto, Japan), 2 μL cDNA samples, 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), and 2 μLdd H2O in a reaction system of 10 μL. The thermal cycle was as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 15 s, 62 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Melting-curve analysis was performed directly after real-time PCR to verify the presence of gene-specific PCR products. This analysis was done at 94 °C for 15 s, followed by a constant increase from 60 to 95 °C at a 2% ramp rate. The apple EF-1α gene (Gen Bank accession No. DQ341381) was used as an internal control and served as a standard gene for normalizing all mRNA expression levels. The relative amount of template present in each PCR amplification mixture was evaluated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method, where the mean values were obtained from three independent PCR amplifications.

4. Discussion

Transcription factors are vital for the growth and development of plants. The BBX gene family is a group of transcription factor proteins possessing the B-box and some members have additional CCT conserved domains [42,43]. Genome-wide identification of the BBX gene family has been reported in Arabidopsis, rice, barley, sugar beet, grape, tomato, maize, potato, and pear [5,44,45,46,47,48,49], and is responsible for different physiological activities such as the development of flowers, seedling photomorphogenesis, shade avoidance, and responses to biotic or abiotic stresses [43]. However, no systematic study has been performed in Rosaceae species. Although, the BBX gene family has been already reported in apple and pear [34,35] we found more BBX homologs in apple and pear than previous works (Figure 1). The updated correspondent genome database could be the difference maker between our work and previously reported work on the apple and pear. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify BBX genes, and study the evolutionary relationships in seven Rosaceae species and their gene structure, chromosomal location, duplication, phylogenetic analysis, and expression pattern. We found 212 putative BBX genes in seven Rosaceae species including 67 from Malus × domestica, 40 from Pyrus communis, 22 from Rosa Chinesis, 20 from Prunus persica, 21 from Fragaria vesca, 22 from Prunus avium, and 20 from Rubus occidentalis (Figure 1).
A hypothetical model has been reported for the evolution of BBX in green plants [48]. The theory stated that originally the BBXs of green plants contained the only B-box-2 domain; however, the duplication of B-box-2 domains gave birth to the B-box-1 domain. The conserved sequence analysis showed that 27 MdBBX members possess two B-box domains. Similarly, we found 17, 12, 10, 11, 10, and 11 BBX genes with two B-boxes in Malus × domestica, Pyrus communis, Rosa Chinensis, Prunus persica, Fragaria vesca, Prunus avium, and Rubus occidentalis genomes, respectively, whereas the number of BBX genes with one B-box were greater (Figure S2). In Arabidopsis, 21 BBX members had two B-box domains [42]. Two B-box domains were found in 17 rice BBXs genes [30]. The number of two B-box domains containing genes was 18 in tomato [47] and potato [30], correspondingly. The occurrence of B-box sequences in different species proposed that the B-box domain is highly conserved in plants. The detail sequence alignment of Rosaceae BBX members (Figure S1) revealed that the B-box1 domain was highly conserved compared with the B-box2 domain, suggesting that a deletion event could happen in the B-box2 domain. It was postulated that the B-BOX2 domain of the BBX proteins is deleted in the evolution process [5].
Most of the Rosaceae BBX genes having two B-boxes domains were clustered into subfamily II, III, and IV. The deletion of B-box 2 leads to proteins with only the B-box 1 motif which was detected in subfamily II while remaining BBX genes of this category was found in subfamily V and VI.
Previous studies identified four different types of BBX genes based on domain organization in tomato and Arabidopsis [1]. We also found four different types of BBX genes, BBX genes with only one B-BOX domain, BBX genes with two B-boxes domains, BBX genes with one B-BOX, and additional CCT domains and BBX genes with two B-BOXes and additional CCT domains. However, we detected a small difference in the composition of various classes of BBX genes in different species (Figure S2). The numbers of BBX with only one B-BOX domain, two tandem B-BOXes, BOX1 plus CCT, two tandem B-boxes plus the CCT domain were 7, 8, 4, and 13, and 6, 10, 5, and 8 in Arabidopsis and tomato, respectively, however this arrangement was 33, 16, 8, and 10 in apple, 13, 13, 3, and 11 in pear, 5, 5, 4, and 6 in peach, 7, 6, 3, and 5 in strawberry, 6, 7, 4, and 5 in Rose, 10, 4, 2, and 6 in sweet cherry, and 6, 6, 3, and 5 in black raspberry. The results indicate that BBX gene family may share conserved gene architecture and domain organization in plants during the evolution process.
The study of BBX in Arabidopsis [42] divided the 32 BBX candidates into five subfamilies on the basis of conserved domains. Subfamily 1 and II contained 13 AtBBX members (AtBBX to AtBBX13), and these genes had two B-BOXes and additional CCT domains. AtBBX14 to AtBBX17 carries BOX1 and the CCT domains which were clustered into subfamily III. AtBBX18 to AtBBX25 were grouped to subfamily IV, and possess both B-BOX1 and B-BOX2 domains. The remaining AtBBX genes (AtBBX26 to AtBBX32) held the B-BOX1 domain, and were only noticed in subfamily V. However, conserved domains based classification of Rosaceae BBX proteins was rather difficult. We observed that the clustering phenomena of Rosaceae species BBX genes were different from the Arabidopsis BBX (Figure 4). A maximum number of double B-Box and additional CCT domain containing BBX members were detected in V and VI subfamilies, whereas in Arabidopsis these BBX genes were clustered together in subfamily I and II. One B-box and additional CCT domain possessing Rosaceae BBX members were noted in subfamily I, V, and VI, whereas such type of BBX members was found in subfamily III. A high number of only one B-box domain containing BBX members were noticed in subfamily II and V in Rosaceae and Arabidopsis, respectively. A similar difference was observed for BBX members having two B-box domains between Rosaceae and Arabidopsis. The reason behind the uneven distribution may be due to a large number of genes or small differences in the domain organization among the plant species. For instance, we noticed that 7 BBX genes possessed only one B-BOX domain, 8 BBX gene members had two B-boxes domain, 4 BBX members contained one B-BOX and an additional CCT domain, and 13 BBX genes were found with two B-BOXes and additional CCT domains in Arabidopsis. On the contrary, 33 BBX genes possessed only one B-BOX domain, 16 BBX genes found having two B-boxes domains, one B-BOX and additional CCT domain were observed in 8 BBX members and 10 BBX genes comprised of two B-BOXes and additional CCT domains in apple BBX genes. Similar differences were also observed for B-BOX genes in other Rosaceae members in the present study. However, we noticed that most of the members shared similar gene structures and functions within the subfamily. We also found some BBX genes members that showed different intron-exon structure within the same subfamily, but they were similar in function. For instance, MdBBX14 (two introns and three exons) and MdBBX41 (three introns and four exons) showed similar expression patterns in tested samples. We also observed some BBX members that were similar in structure showed different functions such as MdBBX41 (three introns and four exons) and MdBBX43 (three introns and four exons).
Gene duplication could be tandem, segmental, or be caused by something from the whole genome, and duplicated genes are important for the plant growth and development. Recently, various genes encoding transcription factors have been recognized, and most of them showed gene duplication such as AP2 (ethylene-responsive-element-binding AP2 DNA-binding domain), MADS, SPL, and DOF (DNA binding with One Finger) [30,32,49,50]. Gene duplication phenomena are vital for gene family expansion. The expansion and duplication analysis of BBX genes have also been carried out in maize [46] and rice [8]. Eight pairs of MdBBX were found to participate in tandem duplication, while thirty-seven pairs were observed as segmental duplicated in this study. These findings suggest that the expansion of the BBX gene family in apple occurred through tandem and segmental duplication. The quite similar mechanism of gene family evolution was also found in the GRAS (Gibberellic acid insensitive, repressor, and scarecrow) gene family in apple [51].
The identified BBX genes were distributed unevenly in the whole genome of studied species. The highest numbers of genes were found on chromosome 13, 1, 2, 6, 6, 3, and 2 in apple, peach, black raspberry, strawberry, sweet cherry, and Rose genomes, respectively (Figure 2). The chromosomal appearance of BBX genes was different from studied BBX genes in other species. No BBX gene was observed on chromosome 4 in apple, similar findings were previously found in pear [47]. In addition, fourteen MdBBXs were not mapped on the chromosome, maybe due to the high level of heterozygosity or quality of apple genome sequence. We used the ArrayExpress data to study the expression pattern of the MdBBX genes in different tissues and organs to determine the potential function of the BBX gene family in the growth and development of apple (Figure 7). The diverse expression pattern of apple BBX genes may be due to gene location, length, and sequences. We studied the transcript level of these genes in five different tissues by qRT-PCR based on the expression patterns of MdBBX genes obtained from microarray database. The MdBBX genes displayed different expression patterns among the tested tissues. Leaves and buds were used to study flower induction in Arabidopsis and other plants [52]. Most of the studied MdBBX genes have higher expression levels in leaf and buds compared with other tissues, showing their influence in the flower induction (Figure 8). Additionally, the transcribed level of MdBBX genes was considerably similar with the results from microarray data. The present study suggested that some MdBBX genes with diverse expression profiles in examined tissues might play vital roles in plant development, and some MdBBX genes may have a unique function in different developmental stages.
Several environmental and internal factors such as temperature, hormones, and photosynthesis control flower induction in plants [6,9,16]. Hormones and sugar alter the flowering in apple, however, the relationship of MdBBX with hormones and sugar remains unknown. Up to date, GA, 6-BA, and sugar are considered to be associated with flower induction. Previous studies also found that exogenous treatment of (GA3, 6-BA, and sugar) can change the flowering rates [6,36,37]. Although the contribution of BBX genes in the regulation of plant growth and development have been well studied, little is known regarding the involvement of BBX genes in the flower induction in fruit species. Several investigations have proposed that BBX genes are important for the photoperiodic regulation of flowering, seedling photomorphogenesis, shade avoidance, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, it has been also stated that CO encodes a putative zinc finger transcription factor that is key for the promotion of flowering [53]. Some BBXs (BBX32, COL6-8, 16/BBX14-17, and BBX7) controlled the flowering time in Chrysanthemum [8]. Based on the previous studies, we evaluated the expression of MdBBX genes in response to these flowering-related treatments. The members of the apple BBX gene family showed distinct expression level after treatments. Previous studies also investigated that BBX genes are involved in flowering and hormones response. AtBBX1 of Arabidopsis promotes flowering during long days [20,51]. AtBBX18 controls gibberellin homeostasis in Arabidopsis [38]. Some BBXs such as BBX2 and BBX3 have little effect on flowering time [22]. Here we found that MdBBXs genes showed diverse gene expression under hormones at a different time point in flowering buds (Figure 9). The changes in expression level of apple BBX genes in flowering-related buds indicates their involvement in flowering induction. A similar expression was displayed by the IDD and GRAS gene family in apple [50,54], and it was postulated that their diverse transcription profile during flower induction showed that they may involve in GA-mediated, 6-BA mediated, or sugar-mediated flowering in apple trees. We also found that some MdBBXs belong to the same phylogenetic group (MdBBX37-MdBBX38) which had a distinct expression profile under treatments indicating that these genes obtained a unique expression profile during evolution. These results were supported by the study of BBX in rice and tomato [40,45], which suggested that phylogenetic clustering is not highly related to functional grouping.
In conclusion, this investigation found 212 BBX genes in the seven members of the Rosaceae species which were distributed unevenly in the whole genome. We classified these BBX genes and performed phylogenetic, structural, synteny, and functional analysis. The present study examined the expression pattern of 19 apple BBX members in different tissues (bud, stem, leaves, flowers, and fruits). The spatiotemporal transcription level indicated that they control multiple functions of plant growth and development. Additionally, the transcript level of some MdBBX members was evaluated under treatments with several flowering-related compounds which suggested that some members of MdBBXs play a vital role in the complex flower induction process. These results may be fruitful for the improvement of flower induction in apple.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials are available online.

Author Contributions

A.S., K.-M.C. and M.H. designed the research; A.S. conducted the experimental work, S.F., P.J., G.L., Y.L., F.D., X.Z. and K.L. contributed to the preparation of biological materials, I.M., S.F. and R.S. performed bioinformatics analysis, A.S. performed gene expression analysis, A.S. drafted the original manuscript and K.-M.C. and M.H. supervised the experiment.
Funding: This work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Supporting Project (2013BAD20B03), China Apple Research System (CARS-28), National Spark Plan Program (2014GA850002), Science and Technology Innovative Engineering Project in Shaanxi province, China (2015NY114), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M56806), Yangling Subsidiary Center Project of the National Apple Improvement Center, and Collaborative Innovation of the Center for Shaanxi Fruit Industry Development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

Ckcontrol
GAgibberellins;
6-BA6-benzylaminopurine;
DAFBdays after full bloom

References

  1. Khanna, R.; Kronmiller, B.; Maszle, D.R.; Coupland, G.; Holm, M.; Mizuno, T.; Wu, S.-H. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3416–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Massiah, M.A.; Matts, J.A.; Short, K.M.; Simmons, B.N.; Singireddy, S.; Yi, Z.; Cox, T.C. Solution structure of the MID1 B-box2 CHC (D/C) C2H2 zinc-binding domain: Insights into an evolutionarily conserved RING fold. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Crocco, C.D.; Botto, J.F. BBX proteins in green plants: Insights into their evolution, structure, feature and functional diversification. Gene 2013, 531, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, H.; Marquardt, K.; Indorf, M.; Jutt, D.; Kircher, S.; Neuhaus, G.; Rodríguez-Franco, M. Nuclear localization and interaction with COP1 are required for STO/BBX24 function during photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1772–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gendron, J.M.; Pruneda-Paz, J.L.; Doherty, C.J.; Gross, A.M.; Kang, S.E.; Kay, S.A. Arabidopsis circadian clock protein, TOC1, is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3167–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gangappa, S.N.; Botto, J.F. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Robson, F.; Costa, M.M.R.; Hepworth, S.R.; Vizir, I.; Reeves, P.H.; Putterill, J.; Coupland, G. Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001, 28, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, Y.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Imtiaz, M.; Lan, H.; Gao, S.; Cheng, L.; Wang, M.; Fei, Z. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2038–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ledger, S.; Strayer, C.; Ashton, F.; Kay, S.A.; Putterill, J. Analysis of the function of two circadian—regulated CONSTANS—LIKE genes. Plant J. 2001, 26, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cheng, X.F.; Wang, Z.Y. Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS—LIKE gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of CO and FT in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 43, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Datta, S.; Hettiarachchi, C.; Johansson, H.; Holm, M. SALT TOLERANCE HOMOLOG2, a B-box protein in Arabidopsis that activates transcription and positively regulates light-mediated development. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3242–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hassidim, M.; Harir, Y.; Yakir, E.; Kron, I.; Green, R.M. Over-expression of CONSTANS-LIKE 5 can induce flowering in short-day grown Arabidopsis. Planta 2009, 230, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Park, H.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y.; Seok, H.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Sung, Z.R.; Moon, Y.-H. EMF1 interacts with EIP1, EIP6 or EIP9 involved in the regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yano, M.; Katayose, Y.; Ashikari, M.; Yamanouchi, U.; Monna, L.; Fuse, T.; Baba, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Umehara, Y.; Nagamura, Y. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, S.-K.; Yun, C.-H.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, Y.H.; Park, H.-Y.; Kim, J.-K. OsCO3, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, controls flowering by negatively regulating the expression of FT-like genes under SD conditions in rice. Planta 2008, 228, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Griffiths, S.; Dunford, R.P.; Coupland, G.; Laurie, D.A. The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1855–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, Y.S.; Jeong, D.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Yi, J.; Ryu, C.H.; Kim, S.L.; Jeong, H.J.; Choi, S.C.; Jin, P.; Yang, J. OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB. Plant J. 2010, 63, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nagaoka, S.; Takano, T. Salt tolerance-related protein STO binds to a Myb transcription factor homologue and confers salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2231–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Belles-Boix, E.; Babiychuk, E.; Van Montagu, M.; Inzé, D.; Kushnir, S. CEO1, a new protein from Arabidopsis thaliana, protects yeast against oxidative damage 1. FEBS Lett. 2000, 482, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jaspers, P.; Blomster, T.; Brosche, M.; Salojärvi, J.; Ahlfors, R.; Vainonen, J.P.; Reddy, R.A.; Immink, R.; Angenent, G.; Turck, F. Unequally redundant RCD1 and SRO1 mediate stress and developmental responses and interact with transcription factors. Plant J. 2009, 60, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fujibe, T.; Saji, H.; Arakawa, K.; Yabe, N.; Takeuchi, Y.; Yamamoto, K.T. A methyl viologen-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis, which is allelic to ozone-sensitive rcd1, is tolerant to supplemental ultraviolet-B irradiation. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Q.; Tu, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Rao, L. Heat stress-induced BBX18 negatively regulates the thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Boil. Rep. 2013, 40, 2679–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Weng, X.; Wang, L.; Xie, W. The rice B-box zinc finger gene family: Genomic identification, characterization, expression profiling and diurnal analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kurokura, T.; Mimida, N.; Battey, N.H.; Hytönen, T. The regulation of seasonal flowering in the Rosaceaee. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4131–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guitton, B.; Kelner, J.-J.; Velasco, R.; Gardiner, S.E.; Chagné, D.; Costes, E. Genetic control of biennial bearing in apple. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 63, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Xing, L.-B.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y.-M.; Shen, Y.-W.; Zhao, C.-P.; Ma, J.-J.; An, N.; Han, M.-Y. Transcription profiles reveal sugar and hormone signaling pathways mediating flower induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 2052–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fan, S.; Zhang, D.; Lei, C.; Chen, H.; Xing, L.; Ma, J.; Zhao, C.; Han, M. Proteome analyses using iTRAQ labeling reveal critical mechanisms in alternate bearing Malus Prunifolia. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 3602–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xing, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, C.; Han, M. Effect of exogenous 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) on branch type, floral induction and initiation, and related gene expression in ‘Fuji’apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 79, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Fan, S.; Du, L.; Shen, Y.; Xing, L.; Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Han, M. Effect of exogenous GA 3 and its inhibitor paclobutrazol on floral formation, endogenous hormones, and flowering-associated genes in ‘Fuji’apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Porri, A.; Torti, S.; Romera-Branchat, M.; Coupland, G. Spatially distinct regulatory roles for gibberellins in the promotion of flowering of Arabidopsis under long photoperiods. Development 2012, 139, 2198–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Li, J.; Hou, H.; Li, X.; Xiang, J.; Yin, X.; Gao, H.; Zheng, Y.; Bassett, C.L.; Wang, X. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the SBP-box family genes in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 70, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kumar, G.; Arya, P.; Gupta, K.; Randhawa, V.; Acharya, V.; Singh, A.K. Comparative phylogenetic analysis and transcriptional profiling of MADS-box gene family identified DAM and FLC-like genes in apple (Malusx domestica). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Velasco, R.; Zharkikh, A.; Affourtit, J.; Dhingra, A.; Cestaro, A.; Kalyanaraman, A.; Fontana, P.; Bhatnagar, S.K.; Troggio, M.; Pruss, D. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Cao, Y.; Han, Y.; Meng, D.; Li, D.; Jiao, C.; Jin, Q.; Lin, Y.; Cai, Y. B-BOX genes: Genome-wide identification, evolution and their contribution to pollen growth in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, X.; Li, R.; Dai, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the B-box gene family in the Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) genome. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2018, 293, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chia, T.; Müller, A.; Jung, C.; Mutasa-Göttgens, E. Sugar beet contains a large CONSTANS-LIKE gene family including a CO homologue that is independent of the early-bolting (B) gene locus. J. Experim. Bot. 2008, 59, 2735–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chu, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, H.; Ouyang, B. Genomic organization, phylogenetic and expression analysis of the B-BOX gene family in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bailey, T.L.; Williams, N.; Misleh, C.; Li, W.W. MEME: Discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Suppl. 2), W369–W373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2014, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Gambino, G.; Perrone, I.; Gribaudo, I. A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochem. Anal. 2008, 19, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Murelli, C.; Rizza, F.; Albini, F.M.; Dulio, A.; Terzi, V.; Cattivelli, L. Metabolic changes associated with cold-acclimation in contrasting cultivars of barley. Physiol. Plant. 1995, 94, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Weigel, D.; Alvarez, J.; Smyth, D.R.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Meyerowitz, E.M. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 1992, 69, 843–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, W.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, M.; Meng, Z. Expression analysis of genes encoding double B-box zinc finger proteins in maize. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2017, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zou, Z.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Yang, S.; Yang, Y. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of the BBX family genes in pear. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 93, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Crocco, C.D.; Holm, M.; Yanovsky, M.J.; Botto, J.F. AtBBX21 and COP1 genetically interact in the regulation of shade avoidance. Plant J. 2010, 64, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zahn, L.M.; Kong, H.; Leebens-Mack, J.H.; Kim, S.; Soltis, P.S.; Landherr, L.L.; Soltis, D.E.; Ma, H. The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of MADS-box genes. Genetics 2005, 169, 2209–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Moreno-Risueno, M.Á.; Martínez, M.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Carbonero, P. The family of DOF transcription factors: From green unicellular algae to vascular plants. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 277, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shigyo, M.; Tabei, N.; Yoneyama, T.; Yanagisawa, S. Evolutionary processes during the formation of the plant-specific Dof transcription factor family. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fan, S.; Zhang, D.; Gao, C.; Zhao, M.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Han, M. Identification, Classification, and Expression Analysis of GRAS Gene Family in Malus domestica. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Mizukami, Y.; Ma, H. Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Galvão, V.C.; Horrer, D.; Küttner, F.; Schmid, M. Spatial control of flowering by DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Putterill, J.; Robson, F.; Lee, K.; Simon, R.; Coupland, G. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 1995, 80, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fan, S.; Zhang, D.; Xing, L.; Qi, S.; Du, L.; Wu, H.; Shao, H.; Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Han, M. Phylogenetic analysis of IDD gene family and characterization of its expression in response to flower induction in Malus. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2017, 292, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 23 01763 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical presentation of BBX gene members in seven Rosaceae species genome.
Figure 1. Graphical presentation of BBX gene members in seven Rosaceae species genome.
Molecules 23 01763 g001
Molecules 23 01763 g002a 550Molecules 23 01763 g002b 550
Figure 2. Chromosomal location of BBX genes on apple chromosomes. (A) Malus × domestica; (B) Fragaria vesca; (C) Rubus occidentalis; (D) Prunus persica; (E) Rosa Chinensis; (F) Prunus avium, respectively. The graphical view was drawn from each gene ID and scaffolds information and position of each gene are indicated by a line.
Figure 2. Chromosomal location of BBX genes on apple chromosomes. (A) Malus × domestica; (B) Fragaria vesca; (C) Rubus occidentalis; (D) Prunus persica; (E) Rosa Chinensis; (F) Prunus avium, respectively. The graphical view was drawn from each gene ID and scaffolds information and position of each gene are indicated by a line.
Molecules 23 01763 g002aMolecules 23 01763 g002b
Molecules 23 01763 g003 550
Figure 3. The web-logos B-Box 1, B-Box2, and CCT-domain of Rosaceae BBX members.
Figure 3. The web-logos B-Box 1, B-Box2, and CCT-domain of Rosaceae BBX members.
Molecules 23 01763 g003
Molecules 23 01763 g004 550
Figure 4. Systematic evolutionary relationships of BBX gene family 7 different Rosaceae species among six lineages within the subfamilies. The six conserved subfamilies are marked by different colors and represented as Subfamily-I, Subfamily-II, Subfamily-III, Subfamily-IV, Subfamily-V, and Subfamily-VI.
Figure 4. Systematic evolutionary relationships of BBX gene family 7 different Rosaceae species among six lineages within the subfamilies. The six conserved subfamilies are marked by different colors and represented as Subfamily-I, Subfamily-II, Subfamily-III, Subfamily-IV, Subfamily-V, and Subfamily-VI.
Molecules 23 01763 g004
Molecules 23 01763 g005 550
Figure 5. Segmental duplication of apple BBX genes. Genomic locations and duplicated BBX gene pairs in apple. Gene pairs located in the segmental duplicated chromosomal regions are linked using different lines.
Figure 5. Segmental duplication of apple BBX genes. Genomic locations and duplicated BBX gene pairs in apple. Gene pairs located in the segmental duplicated chromosomal regions are linked using different lines.
Molecules 23 01763 g005
Molecules 23 01763 g006 550
Figure 6. Synteny analysis of apple and Arabidopsis BBX genes. Chromosomes of apple and Arabidopsis are shown in different colors and in circular form. The approximate positions of the AtBBX and MdBBX genes are marked with a short black line on the circle. Colored curves denote the syntenic relationships between Apple and Arabidopsis BBX genes.
Figure 6. Synteny analysis of apple and Arabidopsis BBX genes. Chromosomes of apple and Arabidopsis are shown in different colors and in circular form. The approximate positions of the AtBBX and MdBBX genes are marked with a short black line on the circle. Colored curves denote the syntenic relationships between Apple and Arabidopsis BBX genes.
Molecules 23 01763 g006
Molecules 23 01763 g007 550
Figure 7. The expression profiles obtained from the ArrayExpress data, displaying diverse expression levels of apple BBX genes in different tissues and organs. The relative transcript level of BBX genes members based on ArrayExpress data was presented as heat maps from blue to yellow reflecting relative signal values; where dark blue boxes represent stronger downregulated expression and dark yellow boxes represent stronger up-regulation. 100daa referred for 100 days postanthesis, GD stand for Golden Delicious’ seedling, M74 indicating Hybrid M74, M49 indicated M49 hybrid, M20 indicated M20 hybrid, M14 indicated M14 hybrid, X8877 indicated X8877 hybrid, and X4442 and X2596 referred the cross between X4442 and X2596 varieties.
Figure 7. The expression profiles obtained from the ArrayExpress data, displaying diverse expression levels of apple BBX genes in different tissues and organs. The relative transcript level of BBX genes members based on ArrayExpress data was presented as heat maps from blue to yellow reflecting relative signal values; where dark blue boxes represent stronger downregulated expression and dark yellow boxes represent stronger up-regulation. 100daa referred for 100 days postanthesis, GD stand for Golden Delicious’ seedling, M74 indicating Hybrid M74, M49 indicated M49 hybrid, M20 indicated M20 hybrid, M14 indicated M14 hybrid, X8877 indicated X8877 hybrid, and X4442 and X2596 referred the cross between X4442 and X2596 varieties.
Molecules 23 01763 g007
Molecules 23 01763 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression profile of the MdBBX genes in tested tissues. The graphs indicate tissue-specific expression levels in the apple plant. The samples were collected in different developmental stages and were analyzed through qRT-PCR. The x-axis indicates the tissues. The y-axis shows the relative expression. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of the three independent qRT-PCR replicates.
Figure 8. Expression profile of the MdBBX genes in tested tissues. The graphs indicate tissue-specific expression levels in the apple plant. The samples were collected in different developmental stages and were analyzed through qRT-PCR. The x-axis indicates the tissues. The y-axis shows the relative expression. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of the three independent qRT-PCR replicates.
Molecules 23 01763 g008
Molecules 23 01763 g009a 550Molecules 23 01763 g009b 550Molecules 23 01763 g009c 550
Figure 9. Inducible expression profile of apple BBX gene family members in response to flowering-related treatments (6-BA, Sugar, and GA), where Ck represents the control, 6-BA represents 6-benzylaminopurine, and GA represents gibberellins. The x-axis indicates the treatment. The y-axis shows the relative expression level of each treatment compared to control (Ck). The error bars indicate the standard deviations of the three independent qRT-PCR replicates.
Figure 9. Inducible expression profile of apple BBX gene family members in response to flowering-related treatments (6-BA, Sugar, and GA), where Ck represents the control, 6-BA represents 6-benzylaminopurine, and GA represents gibberellins. The x-axis indicates the treatment. The y-axis shows the relative expression level of each treatment compared to control (Ck). The error bars indicate the standard deviations of the three independent qRT-PCR replicates.
Molecules 23 01763 g009aMolecules 23 01763 g009bMolecules 23 01763 g009c
Table
Table 1. The sequence analysis and weblog of 10 identified motifs of the BBX gene family in seven Rosaceae species.
Table 1. The sequence analysis and weblog of 10 identified motifs of the BBX gene family in seven Rosaceae species.
S. No.SequencesWidthLogo
1HSANKLASRHQRVLLCHVSS66 Molecules 23 01763 i001
2PARVYCKADEAALCVACDAKV67 Molecules 23 01763 i002
3KKTRKFEKTIRYASRKAYAETRPRIKGRF21 Molecules 23 01763 i003
4CDICQEAAAFLFCREDRALLCRECDAIIHAANKRTSKHERF16 Molecules 23 01763 i004
5SPTPWKGSGNKLGPTVSVCESCVNNLEGRHEEDEDEDDDDE14 Molecules 23 01763 i005
6WLIPNPNFNSKLHMDIAPDILKSSDDLIFPEIDSLLEFDYPTSVHTISGS5 Molecules 23 01763 i006
7DDGAEEDEENQVVPLSSTPPPPPPSSSASSREZRLSESVNGDGSSARREP8 Molecules 23 01763 i007
8PLGDGPGIQMPTQLSDMDREARVLRYREK15 Molecules 23 01763 i008
9PVQPDPIPPPSFNMNYNISGPADHNCFDLDFCRSKLYSSFN5 Molecules 23 01763 i009
10MKIQCDSCZKA45 Molecules 23 01763 i010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shalmani, A.; Fan, S.; Jia, P.; Li, G.; Muhammad, I.; Li, Y.; Sharif, R.; Dong, F.; Zuo, X.; Li, K.; et al. Genome Identification of B-BOX Gene Family Members in Seven Rosaceae Species and Their Expression Analysis in Response to Flower Induction in Malus domestica. Molecules 2018, 23, 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071763

AMA Style

Shalmani A, Fan S, Jia P, Li G, Muhammad I, Li Y, Sharif R, Dong F, Zuo X, Li K, et al. Genome Identification of B-BOX Gene Family Members in Seven Rosaceae Species and Their Expression Analysis in Response to Flower Induction in Malus domestica. Molecules. 2018; 23(7):1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shalmani, Abdullah, Sheng Fan, Peng Jia, Guofang Li, Izhar Muhammad, Youmei Li, Rahat Sharif, Feng Dong, Xiya Zuo, Ke Li, and et al. 2018. "Genome Identification of B-BOX Gene Family Members in Seven Rosaceae Species and Their Expression Analysis in Response to Flower Induction in Malus domestica" Molecules 23, no. 7: 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071763

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop