Topic Editors

School of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
Faculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi 930-8555, Japan

Intelligent Optimization Algorithm: Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
31 January 2027
Manuscript submission deadline
31 March 2027
Viewed by
908

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Intelligent optimization algorithms (IOAs) are a branch of artificial intelligence that emphasize developing and using information learned from data to solve complex searching, learning, and simulation problems. Many real-world applications for complex industrial engineering or design problems could be modeled as searching, learning, and simulation problems. With the learning ability, IOAs are emerging approaches that utilize advanced computation power with meta-heuristics algorithms and massive data processing techniques. These approaches have been actively investigated and applied to many real-world applications, such as scheduling and logistics operations.

Intelligent optimization algorithms, learned from biological or social phenomena, are a collection of search and optimization techniques. IOAs include bio-inspired intelligent algorithms, evolutionary computation methods, and swarm intelligence, among others. With these methods, optimization problems, which can be represented in any form, do not need to be mathematically represented as continuous and differentiable functions. The only requirement for representing optimization problems is to evaluate each individual as the termed fitness value. Therefore, IOAs could be utilized to solve more general optimization problems, especially for issues that are difficult to solve with traditional hill-climbing algorithms.

Real-world applications have complex properties. Massive data are collected and used in scheduling tasks to optimize route selection, taxi dispatching, dynamic transit bus scheduling, and other mobility services to improve operational efficiency. Another example is logistics, where material movements within and between supply chain entities, including warehouses, factories, distribution centers, and retail shops, are improved and optimized with advanced data-oriented techniques. Many applications of IOAs have been reported. However, more research should be conducted on the theory of IOAs. More efficient algorithms could be designed with the understanding of the search process on IOAs.

Due to the complexity of real-world applications, no one panacea can solve all troubles. IOAs are practical approaches to handling such complexity, utilizing evolutionary computation, swarm intelligence, and other meta-heuristic methods based on domain expert knowledge and experience.

Scope of the topic:

Submissions involving real-world case studies are encouraged, particularly those focused on, but not limited to, the following topics:

  • Artificial intelligence;
  • Deep learning;
  • Data mining;
  • Data-driven optimization methods;
  • Time-series forecasting;
  • Time-series anomaly detection;
  • Swarm intelligence;
  • Intelligent computing;
  • Bio-inspired algorithms and nature-inspired computing;
  • Computational intelligence and evolutionary algorithms;
  • Meta-heuristic algorithms;
  • Intelligent optimization algorithms;
  • Other related topics.

Dr. Shi Cheng
Dr. Chaomin Luo
Prof. Dr. Shangce Gao
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • deep learning
  • swarm intelligence
  • data-driven optimization methods
  • time-series forecasting
  • computational intelligence and evolutionary algorithms
  • meta-heuristic algorithms
  • intelligent optimization algorithms
  • data mining
  • time-series anomaly detection

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Algorithms
algorithms
2.6 5.4 2008 19.2 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Applied Sciences
applsci
2.9 6.1 2011 16 Days CHF 2400 Submit
AppliedMath
appliedmath
1.4 1.4 2021 20.6 Days CHF 1200 Submit
Computation
computation
2.6 5.2 2013 14.8 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Mathematics
mathematics
2.3 5.4 2013 17.3 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sci
sci
4.1 5.4 2019 26.7 Days CHF 1400 Submit
Symmetry
symmetry
2.2 5.2 2009 15.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 7940 KB  
Article
A Two-Stage Fitness Learning Model-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm for Imbalanced Multimodal Multi-Objective Optimization
by Aoshuang Yang, Qiaoyong Jiang and Yanyan Lin
Symmetry 2026, 18(6), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18060934 - 29 May 2026
Viewed by 162
Abstract
In recent years, multimodal multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) have become a hot research topic in the field of evolutionary computation in recent years, whose main goal is to locate all equivalent Pareto-optimal solution sets. Although existing evolutionary multimodal multi-objective algorithms (MMOAs) perform well [...] Read more.
In recent years, multimodal multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) have become a hot research topic in the field of evolutionary computation in recent years, whose main goal is to locate all equivalent Pareto-optimal solution sets. Although existing evolutionary multimodal multi-objective algorithms (MMOAs) perform well when there is no obvious difference in the search difficulty of different Pareto-optimal solution sets, they face great challenges when such difficulty differences are prominent, as most current MMOAs fail to effectively address the imbalance of fitness landscapes, leading to an inability to stably find all Pareto-optimal modes and poor robustness in complex MMOPs. To fill this gap, the main objective of this study is to propose a novel MMOA that can adapt to imbalanced fitness landscapes, thereby improving the ability to locate all Pareto-optimal solution sets and enhancing the algorithm’s robustness. To achieve this objective, a novel multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on a two-stage fitness learning model is proposed. First, a multi-subpopulation cooperative search strategy is designed. Based on the principle of speciation, this strategy divides the population into several subpopulations, with the formation of each subpopulation guided by individual similarity in the decision space, thereby guiding the population to perform decentralized search across different modes. Second, a two-stage fitness learning model is developed. In the early and middle stages of evolution, individual fitness is evaluated by integrating Pareto dominance strength and density estimates based on the local outlier factor; in the late stage of evolution, individual fitness is evaluated using fast non-dominated sorting and twin-mirror crowding distance. The former is used to balance the convergence and diversity of the population in the decision space, while the latter is used to improve the convergence and diversity of the population in both the decision space and the objective space. Finally, simulation experiments are conducted on 12 imbalanced multimodal multi-objective optimization problems, and the results are compared to those of seven popular evolutionary multimodal multi-objective optimization algorithms. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can find all modes for different problems and exhibits better robustness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop