Search Results (98)

Background and Clinical Significance: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different spread of metastases. In particular, skin metastases are common in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, anti-HER2 therapies have shown limited activity in this context. Recently, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel potent anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), has revolutionized the therapeutic armamentarium of HER2 mBC with unprecedented evidence of efficacy in pretreated patients. However, the activity of this drug in patients with skin involvement is largely unknown. Case Presentation: Here, we report a case of extensive cutaneous involvement in a heavily pretreated patient who achieved a long-lasting complete response to T-DXd, which, unexpectedly, remained sustained for more than three years following treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Skin toxicity is not a common adverse event with this agent, and, as demonstrated in the present case, it might not be drug-related, and additional causes might be ruled out before treatment discontinuation. However, the possibility of discontinuing anti-Her2 treatment in a patient who has achieved a complete response could represent a field of research, potentially using liquid biopsy or other new technologies. Full article

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease representing a clinically relevant subset. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment in advanced settings, following the landmark ToGA trial. However, resistance to trastuzumab has emerged as a significant limitation, prompting the need for more effective second-line therapies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan, a novel antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) composed of trastuzumab linked to a cytotoxic payload, has demonstrated promising efficacy in trastuzumab-refractory, HER2-positive GC, including cases with heterogeneous HER2 expression. Other HER2-targeted ADCs are also under investigation as potential alternatives. In addition, strategies to overcome resistance include HER2-specific immune-based therapies, such as peptide vaccines and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, as well as antibodies targeting distinct HER2 domains or downstream signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT. These emerging approaches aim to improve efficacy in both HER2-high and HER2-low GC. As HER2-targeted treatments evolve, addressing resistance mechanisms and optimizing therapy for broader patient populations is critical. This review discusses current and emerging HER2-directed strategies in GC, focusing on trastuzumab deruxtecan and beyond, and outlines future directions to improve outcomes for patients with HER2-positive GC across all clinical settings. Full article

Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable prognosis compared to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Current treatment strategies for UTUC are largely derived from bladder cancer studies, underscoring the need for UTUC-directed research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UTUC, encompassing diagnostic approaches, systemic and intraluminal therapies, surgical management, and future directions. Methods: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing evidence from guideline-based recommendations, retrospective and prospective clinical studies, and ongoing trials focused on UTUC. Results: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is increasingly preferred in UTUC due to the risk of postoperative renal impairment that may preclude adjuvant cisplatin use. Surgical management includes kidney-sparing approaches and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with selection guided by tumor risk and patient comorbidities. While endoscopic management (EM) preserves renal function, it carries a higher recurrence and surveillance burden; RNU remains standard for high-risk cases. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic UTUC mirrors that of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy over chemotherapy in the EV-302 trial, with improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across subgroups, including UTUC. For patients ineligible for EV, the CheckMate-901 study supported first-line chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nivolumab. Further systemic therapy strategies include maintenance avelumab post-chemotherapy (JAVELIN Bladder 100), targeted therapies such as erdafitinib (THOR trial), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-PanTumor02) in FGFR2/3-altered and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Conclusions: Historically, the therapeutic landscape of UTUC has been extrapolated from bladder cancer; however, ongoing research specific to UTUC is deriving more precise regimens involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and biomarker-driven therapies. Full article

Background: The treatment options for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer include targeted therapies, cytotoxic chemotherapies, and immunotherapy. However, limited specificity and inevitable resistance highlight the need for novel agents. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), represent a breakthrough by selectively delivering cytotoxic agents to tumor cells, potentially improving the therapeutic index. Despite demonstrated efficacy, ADCs present toxicity profiles similar to conventional chemotherapy, alongside unique adverse events. In clinical practice, oncologists may face scenarios where both T-DXd and SG are treatment options in HER2-negative mBC. To enable shared decision-making, it is crucial to present a comprehensive overview that includes both efficacy data and detailed toxicity profiles. Our objective was to provide a pooled and informative synthesis of toxicities from pivotal studies, including graphical representations, to support informed, patient-centered medical decisions. Methods: We reviewed safety data from phase 3 clinical trials in HER2-negative mBC: DESTINY-Breast04/DESTINY-Breast06 for T-DXd and ASCENT/TROPICS-02 for SG. Adverse event (AE) profiles, including frequency and severity, were extracted, and weighted means were calculated. Emerging ADCs such as datopotamab deruxtecan and patritumab deruxtecan were considered to contextualize future therapeutic decisions. Results: Tables, bar plots and radar plots were generated. T-DXd demonstrated high rates of nausea (69.2%), fatigue (47.2%), and neutropenia (35.6%), with 52.7% experiencing grade ≥ 3 AEs. Notably, pneumonitis occurred in 10.7%, with grade ≥ 3 in 2.6%. SG showed a distinct AE profile, with higher incidences of neutropenia (67.1%), with grade ≥ 3 in 51.3%, and diarrhea (60.8%). Conclusions: The choice between ADCs in HER2-negative metastatic BC when both T-DXd and SG are treatment options should consider toxicity profiles to optimize patient-centered treatment strategies. Tailoring ADC selection based on individual tolerance and preferences is critical for shared decision-making, and future research should focus on assessing the utility and acceptability of such clinical tools to guide treatment selection. Full article

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized precision oncology by enabling targeted drug delivery with improved therapeutic indices. Among these, deruxtecan (DXd)-based ADCs have demonstrated remarkable efficacy across a range of cancers, particularly in tumors expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), and trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2), including breast, lung, gastric, and other solid tumors. DXd, a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor, enhances the cytotoxic potential of ADCs through a cleavable and stable linker and a high drug-to-antibody ratio that ensures optimal drug release. The clinical success of trastuzumab DXd (Enhertu^®) and datopotamab DXd (Datroway^®), along with the ongoing development of patritumab DXd, has expanded the therapeutic potential of ADCs. However, challenges remain, including toxicity, resistance, and manufacturing scalability. This review discusses the mechanisms of action, clinical progress, and challenges of DXd-based ADCs, highlighting their transformative role in modern oncology and exploring future directions to optimize their efficacy and accessibility. Full article

Background/Objectives: HER2-positive breast cancer is an aggressive subtype with an established responsiveness to HER2-targeted therapies like ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). However, inter-patient variability in treatment response and toxicity remains a challenge. Hormonal status, particularly menopausal state, may influence breast cancer behavior, therapeutic tolerance, and outcomes, yet data on its effect in patients treated with T-DM1 are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate whether menopausal status independently affects treatment response, side effects, and survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving T-DM1, accounting for the confounding role of age. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 98 female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with T-DM1: 53 premenopausal and 45 postmenopausal. The clinical characteristics, metastatic patterns, treatment history, T-DM1 outcomes, and toxicities were recorded. The statistical analysis included chi-square, t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and Spearman’s correlations. Partial correlation analyses were conducted to isolate the effect of menopausal status by controlling for age. Results: The postmenopausal patients showed higher rates of lung metastasis (42.2% vs. 20.8%) and mortality (60.0% vs. 39.6%) than premenopausal patients. However, no significant differences were found in the T-DM1 response or toxicity profiles. After adjusting for age, menopausal status had no independent association with the treatment outcomes or side effects. Age was the dominant factor influencing performance status, metastatic burden, and mortality risk. Conclusions: Menopausal status affects disease presentation but not T-DM1 efficacy or toxicity when age is accounted for. Treatment decisions should consider age and clinical profile rather than menopausal classification alone when managing HER2-positive breast cancer with T-DM1. Full article

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can harbour different HER2 alterations: HER2 protein overexpression (2–35%), HER2 gene amplification (2–20%), and gene mutations (1–4%). The discovery of the HER2 gene in the 1980s raised great expectations for the treatment of several tumours. However, it was only in 2004 that HER2 mutations were identified, and they currently represent a key druggable target in NSCLC. Despite numerous strengths, there is only one FDA/EMA-approved targeted therapy, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) called trastuzumab deruxtecan for pretreated patients with HER2 mutant NSCLC. In the first-line treatment, the standard of care (SoC) remains chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy. In the past, pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were extensively studied with poor results. But, two newly developed HER2-specific TKIs with low EGFR WT inhibition (BAY2927088 and zongertinib) reported encouraging results and received the breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating new agents. This review focuses on HER2 alterations. Additionally, the anti-HER2 therapies explored so far will be discussed in detail, including the following: HER2 inhibitors (pan-inhibitors and selective inhibitors), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and ADCs. A section of this paper is dedicated to the role of immunotherapy in HER2-altered NSCLC. The last section of this paper focuses on the drugs under development and their challenges. Full article

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm in women and the leading cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 50% of HER2-negative breast cancers exhibit low expression of this protein (HER2-low). Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the HER2 receptor which has shown benefit in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the DESTINY-Breast04 study. However, few data are available on its efficacy in real-world practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter national study (eight centers) including patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+/ in situ hybridization negative) who started T-DXd treatment between January 2022 and March 2024. Patients had received at least one previous line of treatment. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) in patients with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer treated with T-DXd. The secondary endpoints were real-world overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: The study included 35 patients (34 female and 1 male patient), with a median age of 54 years at the start of T-DXd. All patients had an ECOG-PS 0–1, and 26 patients (74%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 4 [1–7], and 23 patients (65.8%) had metastases in three or more sites. With a median follow-up of 7.8 months, rwPFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2.3–9.7), and OS was 15 months (95% CI, 4.7–25.3). In HR-positive patients, the median rwPFS was 6 months (95% CI, 1.2–10.7), compared to 4 months (95% CI, 2.1–5.9) in HR-negative patients. The overall ORR was 52.9%. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (2.9%) and fatigue (2.9%). Conclusions: This study provides real-world data on T-DXd in the treatment of advanced HER2-low breast cancer. It is noteworthy that the population was heavily pre-treated and had a higher proportion of HR-negative patients, which may explain the lower efficacy compared to the DESTINY-Breast04 study. Full article

Background/Objectives: ADCs bring an innovative strategy to cancer treatment by conjugating powerful cytotoxic agents to the specificity of monoclonal antibodies. This review discusses recent advancements and challenges in the field of ADCs, along with future potential applications. Methods: Studies focused on the development of ADCs were reviewed. These include the effects of payload improvements, linker technologies, antibody engineering, and ADC internalization, which were particular topics of examination regarding their role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The efficacy of some ADCs for pancreatic and breast cancers was compared. Results: In TNBC, ADCs such as sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan have improved progression-free survival in advanced cases. In contrast, PDAC ADC development is challenged by low antigen density and poor internalization; despite evidence of target engagement in early trials targeting mesothelin and MUC1, ADCs for PDAC have yet to achieve significant clinical efficacy or regulatory approval. Conclusions: While ADCs have significantly advanced treatment options in TNBC, PDAC remains a difficult target due to its stroma-rich microenvironment and lack of high-density, tumor-specific antigens. This article emphasizes the need for tailor-made ADC designs to enhance results in various types of cancers and provides valuable insight into future advancements in precision oncology. Full article

Background: Breast cancer can be classified based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) phenotypes, defined by the presence or absence of the main IHC markers. IHC phenotyping is important as it determines the prognosis and guides treatment. For example, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, which triggers cell growth and division, is observed in HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: The standard treatment is based on trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in combination with taxane chemotherapy. The possibility of developing metastases depends on those phenotypes. Approximately 25–50% of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer experience brain metastases. This aspect is especially important, as 20% of those patients die as a result. Results: Through the years, many advanced therapies have been introduced to treat brain metastases, including whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), neratinib. Nonetheless, this still remains a therapeutic challenge. Conclusions: In this review, we focus on the treatment and efficiency of therapies targeting HER2-positive breast cancer, mainly concentrating on the current and newly developed treatment options for brain metastases, such as trastuzumab deruxtecan and tucatinib. Full article

Background/Objectives: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80–90% of all lung cancers. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) represent an expanding targeted therapy option for the treatment of NSCLC. The aim is to perform a systematic literature review to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of ADCs currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of NSCLC. Methods: The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ClinicalTrial.gov and Web of Science databases, covering the period from 2014 to 2024. Only randomized and non-randomized phase II-IV clinical trials focusing on ADC-based therapies for adult patients affected by NSCLC were selected. The Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to evaluate the overall risk of bias in the included randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. While GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Efficacy endpoints were categorized based on primary outcomes while safety was assessed through the frequency and severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and a qualitative summary of the findings was conducted. Results: A total of seven studies, including three randomized, three non-randomized, and one without specific allocation, were included, comprising 1287 patients, with 693 (54%) men, and an average age of 63 years old. Two studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias, while six had a moderate risk or some concerns. Five ADCs were evaluated: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), telisotuzumab vedotin, patritumab deruxtecan, and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). T-DXd demonstrated superior efficacy in HER2-overexpressing and HER2-mutant NSCLC, with an ORR of 52.9% and 49.0%, respectively. However, HER2-mutant patients exhibited a longer median DOR (16.8 vs. 6.2 months) but a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 TEAEs (38.6% vs. 22%). T-DM1 showed modest efficacy, with an ORR of 20% in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC and 6.7% in HER2-mutant patients. Dato-DXd demonstrated improved ORR (26.4% vs. 12.8%) and PFS (4.4 vs. 3.7 months) compared to docetaxel. Patritumab deruxtecan achieved an ORR of 39% in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while telisotuzumab vedotin exhibited limited activity in c-MET-positive NSCLC (ORR 9%, median DOR 7.5 months). Frequency and severity of TEAEs varied across ADCs, with ILD being a major concern, highlighting the need for strict patient monitoring and early intervention to mitigate severe adverse events. Conclusions: ADCs represent a promising advancement in NSCLC treatment, offering targeted therapeutic options beyond conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. T-DXd has emerged as the most effective ADC for HER2-mutant NSCLC with manageable safety profile, whereas Dato-DXd provides a viable alternative for TROP2-expressing tumors. While ADCs offer significant clinical benefits, careful patient selection and proactive management of adverse events remain crucial. Ongoing and future trials will further refine the role of ADCs in personalized NSCLC treatment, potentially expanding their tumor-agnostic use to broader patient populations. Full article

Background and Objectives: A recent clinical trial has demonstrated that breast cancer with low-HER2 expression levels responds to trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment. This has prompted a re-evaluation of HER2-targeted therapies in the HER2-negative group. Further research is required in the form of more detailed information about HER2-negative breast cancers with HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low subgroups. This study represents a novel approach to this field. Materials and Methods: HER2-negative breast cancer patients were classified into three groups as HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low. A comparison of clinicopathological features was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Of 722 patients, 22.3% were HER2-null, 23.7% were HER2-ultralow, 54.0% were HER2-low. While two-thirds of all the patients were evaluated as having T2 tumors, T4 tumors constituted 2.4%. Among HER2-negative cases, 11.8% were triple-negative and 88.2% were hormone-positive. The mean tumor diameter was 0.57 cm larger in the HER2-ultralow group than in the HER2-null group and 0.34 cm larger in the HER2-low group than in the HER2-null group. HER2-null tumors tend to be smaller. The HER2-low group was more likely to relapse than the HER2-null group. There were no significant differences in the distribution of hormone positivity or negativity (TNBC) among the groups; they accounted for 89.2% and 10.8% of all cases, respectively. Conclusions: HER2-negative breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and deserves a detailed review in terms of diagnosis and treatment. HER2-ultralow tumors are larger in size and have a prognosis comparable to HER2-null tumors. HER2-low tumors tend to recur much more frequently and with poorer outcomes. In this field, new therapeutic approaches may result in better outcomes. Full article

Camptothecin and its derivatives (CPTs) are potent antineoplastic agents that exert their effects by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I, leading to apoptosis during cell proliferation. Since their discovery in the 1960s, CPTs have faced challenges such as low water solubility, pH-dependent lactone ring instability, and severe off-target toxicities. Despite extensive research, only two CPTs, irinotecan and topotecan, have received health authority approval. Ongoing clinical trials continue to explore the use of CPTs in combination with targeted therapies and immunotherapies to expand their clinical use. Drug delivery systems, including liposomes and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), have significantly enhanced the therapeutic index of CPTs. Liposomal irinotecan (Onivyde^®, Ipsen, Paris, France) and two ADCs delivering CPT payloads, trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu^®, Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) and sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy^®, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA), have demonstrated substantial efficacy and safety. There is promise that novel strategies such as inverse targeting and co-dosing with anti-idiotypic distribution enhancers may expand the utility of CPT ADCs. This review highlights CPT therapies in clinical use and discusses approaches to further enhance their therapeutic selectivity. Full article

Despite recent advances in cancer treatment, the prognosis for uterine malignancies (carcinoma and sarcoma) requires further improvement. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a novel class of anti-cancer therapeutic agents, and multiple ADCs have been approved for other types of cancer. In 2024, trastuzumab deruxtecan received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for cancer types and became the first ADC approved for the treatment of uterine malignancies. Many ADCs are currently being investigated in uterine malignancies, and therefore, there is a need to gain a deeper understanding of ADCs. In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the advancements in ADCs. The contents of this article include the structure and mechanism of action, an analysis of recent clinical trials, and expected future clinical questions. This article also focuses on uterine sarcoma, which is not often highlighted as a target for ADC treatment. Full article

Background: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel therapeutic class that combines an antibody against a tumor-associated antigen (TAA), a payload, and a linker that binds these two components. Serious adverse events (SAEs), particularly those of grade 3 (G3) or higher, frequently contribute to the abandonment of ADCs during clinical development. Methods: In this study, we analyzed the toxicity profiles of all approved ADCs, aiming to uncover correlations between their safety profiles and the specific characteristics of their components. Results: In our analysis, dose reductions, dose delays, treatment discontinuations, and ≥G3 toxicities were not significantly different across payload types. Similarly, no association was found between the payload mechanism of action and ≥G3 toxicities, including anemia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. By exploring the specific toxicities of ADCs observed by organ, we identified that most were related to the payload mechanism of action, like the ≥G3 diarrhea observed in 10% of patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan (the payload SN-38 is the active metabolite of irinotecan), and very few were related to the presence of the TAA in normal tissue (presence of Nectin-4 in skin and ≥G3 rash toxicity in 14% of patients treated with enfortumab vedotin). In line with this, no major differences in ≥G3 toxicities were identified in studies with different levels of the TAA (trastuzumab deruxtecan in Destiny Breast Studies with different HER2 expression levels). Conclusions: Our analysis reveals that most ADC toxicities are driven by the payload’s effects on non-transformed tissues; however, a detailed analysis of each ADC component should be taken into consideration. Full article