Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = prostate core needle biopsy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 418 KB  
Article
Comparing Multigene Molecular Testing Results of MRI-Target Versus Systematic Prostate Needle Biopsies of Candidates for and Under Active Surveillance
by Nicholas J. Lanzotti, Chris Du, Julia Hall, Joseph Saba, Maria M. Picken and Gopal N. Gupta
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070279 - 1 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 960
Abstract
Introduction: The multigene molecular testing of prostate cancer tissue after biopsy provides individualized information to guide further management. The utility of selective genetic testing for MRI-visible target versus systematic cancer in patients as well as during different time points of active surveillance (AS) [...] Read more.
Introduction: The multigene molecular testing of prostate cancer tissue after biopsy provides individualized information to guide further management. The utility of selective genetic testing for MRI-visible target versus systematic cancer in patients as well as during different time points of active surveillance (AS) is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare ProlarisTM results of MRI-target cancers versus systematic cancers on prostate needle biopsy as well as both during consideration for initial AS candidacy and candidacy for remaining on AS. Methods: Our prospectively maintained institutional multiparametric (mp) MRI prostate cancer active surveillance database (2013–2024) was queried for patients that underwent ProlarisTM genetic testing of positive biopsy cores. Baseline information for PSA, PSA density, and ProlarisTM calculated data were collected. Information on the timing of the Prolaris testing, defined as during the initial cancer diagnostic biopsy or on a subsequent confirmatory biopsy was collected. SPSS v29.0 was used to compare the selective ProlarisTM results of MRI-target cancers versus systematic cancers during different points of AS. Results: 264 patients with a ProlarisTM test were identified, 86 with MRI-target and 178 on systematic cancers. 182 ProlarisTM tests were sent on a diagnostic biopsy and 81 on a subsequent biopsy. Overall, MRI-target cancers had similar risk scores (3.23 vs. 3.14, p = 0.18). ProlarisTM scores were higher for GG2 systematic than GG1 target cancers (3.40 vs. 3.18, p = 0.023). The GG2 systematic lesion cohort also had higher predicted the 10-year disease-specific mortality (DSM) (3.40% vs. 2.30%, p < 0.01) and 10-year metastasis risk (1.90% vs. 1.20%, p = 0.013), and more aggressive recommended treatment. Analyses of the ProlarisTM results sent during a diagnostic biopsy yielded similar results. Finally, on an analysis of the ProlarisTM results sent during subsequent biopsy, a systematic GG2 biopsy was noted to have a higher 10-year DSM and metastasis rate, but similar risk scores and treatment recommendations. Conclusions: ProlarisTM tests can be sent at multiple time points of AS, and selectively for MRI-visible versus higher grade cancers. There is no consistent association between MRI-visible cancer and Prolaris risk profile. When utilizing multigene molecular testing in prostate cancer, each individual patient must be evaluated to decide the appropriate level of care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer: Clinical Advances in Personalized Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 19280 KB  
Article
Recognizing Epithelial Cells in Prostatic Glands Using Deep Learning
by Liton Devnath, Puneet Arora, Anita Carraro, Jagoda Korbelik, Mira Keyes, Gang Wang, Martial Guillaud and Calum MacAulay
Cells 2025, 14(10), 737; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100737 - 18 May 2025
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1949
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an integral part of pathological assessment and diagnostic procedures in modern pathology. As most prostate cancers (PCa) arise from glandular epithelial tissue, an AI-based methodology has been developed to recognize glandular epithelial nuclei in prostate biopsy tissue. An [...] Read more.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an integral part of pathological assessment and diagnostic procedures in modern pathology. As most prostate cancers (PCa) arise from glandular epithelial tissue, an AI-based methodology has been developed to recognize glandular epithelial nuclei in prostate biopsy tissue. An integrated machine-learning network, named GlandNet, was developed to correctly recognize the epithelial cells within prostate glands using cell-centric patches selected from the core biopsy specimens. Feulgen-Thionin (a DNA stoichiometric label) was used to stain biopsy sections (4–7 µm in thickness) from 82 active surveillance patients diagnosed with PCa. Images of these sections were human-annotated, and the resultant dataset consisted of 1,264,772 segmented, cell-centric nuclei patches, of which 449,879 were centered on epithelial gland nuclei from 110 needle biopsies (training set: n = 66; validation set: n = 22; and test set: n = 22). The training of GlandNet used semi-supervised machine-learning knowledge of the training and validation cohorts and integrated both human and AI predictions to enhance its performance on the test cohort. The performance was evaluated against a consensus deliberation from three observers. The GlandNet demonstrated an average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 94.1%, 95.7%, 87.8%, and 95.2%, respectively, when tested on the 20,735 glandular cells found in the three needle biopsies with the visually best consensus predictions. Conversely, the average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score were 90.9%, 86.4%, 94.0%, and 89.7% when assessed on 57,217 cells found in the three needle biopsies with the visually worst consensus predictions. GlandNet is a first-generation AI with an excellent ability to differentiate between epithelial and stromal nuclei in core biopsies from patients with early prostate cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Artificial Intelligence to the Rescue of Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 803 KB  
Article
The CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 Prognostic Model Is Significantly Associated with Adverse Post-Surgical Pathology Outcomes
by Chloe Gulliver, Sebastian Huss, Axel Semjonow, George S. Baillie and Ralf Hoffmann
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010262 - 30 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2518
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the association of the prognostic risk score CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 as measured on pre-surgical diagnostic needle biopsy tissue with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomies in a clinically low–intermediate-risk patient cohort. Patients and Methods: RNA was extracted from biopsy punches of diagnostic needle [...] Read more.
Objectives: To investigate the association of the prognostic risk score CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 as measured on pre-surgical diagnostic needle biopsy tissue with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomies in a clinically low–intermediate-risk patient cohort. Patients and Methods: RNA was extracted from biopsy punches of diagnostic needle biopsies. The patient cohort comprises n = 151 patients; of those n = 84 had low–intermediate clinical risk based on the CAPRA score and DRE clinical stage <cT3. This cohort (n = 84) was investigated for pathology outcomes in this study. RT-qPCR was performed to determine PDE4D5, PDE4D7 and PDE4D9 transcript scores in the cohorts. The CAPRA score was inferred from the relevant clinical data (patient age, PSA, cT, biopsy Gleason, and percentage tumor positive biopsy cores). Logistic regression was used to combine the PDE4D5, PDE4D7 and PDE4D9 scores to build a PDE4D5/7/9_BCR regression model. The CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score used was same as previously published. Results: We investigated three post-surgical outcomes in this study: (i) Adverse Pathology (any ISUP pathological Gleason grade >2, or pathological pT stage > pT3a, or tumor penetrated prostate capsular status, or pN1 disease); (ii) any ISUP pathological Gleason >2; (iii) any ISUP pathological Gleason >1. In the n = 84 patients with low to intermediate clinical risk profiles, the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score was significantly lower in patients with favorable vs. unfavorable outcomes. In univariable logistic regression modeling the genomics PDE4D5/7/9_BCR as well as the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR combination model were significantly associated with all three post-surgical pathology outcomes (p = 0.02, p = 0.0004, p = 0.04; and p = 0.01, p = 0.0002, p = 0.01, respectively). The clinically used PRIAS criteria for the selection of low-risk candidate patients for active surveillance (AS) were not significantly associated with any of the three tested post-operative pathology outcomes (p = 0.3, p = 0.1, p = 0.1, respectively). In multivariable analysis adjusted for the CAPRA score, the genomics PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score remained significant for the outcomes of adverse pathology (p = 0.04) and ISUP pathological Gleason >2 (p = 0.004). The negative predictive value of the CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score using the low-risk cut-off (0.1) for the three pathological endpoints was 82.0%, 100%, and 59.1%, respectively for a selected low-risk cohort of n = 22 patients (26.2% of the entire cohort) compared to 72.1%, 94.4%, and 55.6% for n = 18 low-risk patients (21.4% of the total cohort) selected based on the PRIAS inclusion criteria. Conclusion: In this study, we have shown that the previously reported clinical-genomics prostate cancer risk model CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR which was developed to predict biological outcomes after surgery of primary prostate cancer is also significantly associated with post-surgical pathology outcomes. The risk score predicts adverse pathology independent of the clinical risk metrics. Compared to clinically used active surveillance inclusion criteria, the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk model selects 22% (n = 8) more low-risk patients with higher negative predictive value to experience unfavorable post-operative pathology outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Biomarkers for Detection and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 13882 KB  
Article
A Deep Learning Model for Prostate Adenocarcinoma Classification in Needle Biopsy Whole-Slide Images Using Transfer Learning
by Masayuki Tsuneki, Makoto Abe and Fahdi Kanavati
Diagnostics 2022, 12(3), 768; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030768 - 21 Mar 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 6958
Abstract
The histopathological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens is of pivotal importance for determining optimum prostate cancer treatment. Since diagnosing a large number of cases containing 12 core biopsy specimens by pathologists using a microscope is time-consuming manual system and limited [...] Read more.
The histopathological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens is of pivotal importance for determining optimum prostate cancer treatment. Since diagnosing a large number of cases containing 12 core biopsy specimens by pathologists using a microscope is time-consuming manual system and limited in terms of human resources, it is necessary to develop new techniques that can rapidly and accurately screen large numbers of histopathological prostate needle biopsy specimens. Computational pathology applications that can assist pathologists in detecting and classifying prostate adenocarcinoma from whole-slide images (WSIs) would be of great benefit for routine pathological practice. In this paper, we trained deep learning models capable of classifying needle biopsy WSIs into adenocarcinoma and benign (non-neoplastic) lesions. We evaluated the models on needle biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public dataset test sets, achieving an ROC-AUC up to 0.978 in needle biopsy test sets and up to 0.9873 in TCGA test sets for adenocarcinoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Pathological Image Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1453 KB  
Article
Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands
by Rachel N. Flach, Peter-Paul M. Willemse, Britt B. M. Suelmann, Ivette A. G. Deckers, Trudy N. Jonges, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Paul J. van Diest and Richard P. Meijer
Cancers 2021, 13(21), 5378; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215378 - 27 Oct 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 3722
Abstract
Purpose: Our aim was to analyze grading variation between pathology laboratories and between pathologists within individual laboratories using nationwide real-life data. Methods: We retrieved synoptic (n = 13,397) and narrative (n = 29,377) needle biopsy reports from the Dutch Pathology Registry [...] Read more.
Purpose: Our aim was to analyze grading variation between pathology laboratories and between pathologists within individual laboratories using nationwide real-life data. Methods: We retrieved synoptic (n = 13,397) and narrative (n = 29,377) needle biopsy reports from the Dutch Pathology Registry and prostate-specific antigen values from The Netherlands Cancer Registration for prostate cancer patients diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2019. We determined laboratory-specific proportions per histologic grade and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) for International Society of Urological Pathologists Grades 1 vs. 2–5 for 40 laboratories due to treatment implications for higher grades. Pathologist-specific proportions were determined for 21 laboratories that consented to this part of analysis. The synoptic reports of 21 laboratories were used for analysis of case-mix correction for PSA, age, year of diagnosis, number of biopsies and positive cores. Results: A total of 38,321 reports of 35,258 patients were included. Grade 1 ranged between 19.7% and 44.3% per laboratory (national mean = 34.1%). Out of 40 laboratories, 22 (55%) reported a significantly deviant OR, ranging from 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.59) to 1.54 (CI 1.22–1.93). Case-mix correction was performed for 10,294 reports, altering the status of 3/21 (14%) laboratories, but increasing the observed variation (20.8% vs. 17.7%). Within 15/21 (71%) of laboratories, significant inter-pathologist variation existed. Conclusion: Substantial variation in prostate cancer grading was observed between and within Dutch pathology laboratories. Case-mix correction did not explain the variation. Better standardization of prostate cancer grading is warranted to optimize and harmonize treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Prostate Cancer: Pathophysiology, Pathology and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 6927 KB  
Case Report
Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Prostate: A Case Report and Literature Review
by Yasumichi Takeuchi, Daiki Kato, Keita Nakane, Kota Kawase, Manabu Takai, Koji Iinuma, Chiemi Saigo, Tatsuhiko Miyazaki and Takuya Koie
Medicina 2021, 57(11), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111152 - 23 Oct 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3559
Abstract
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) usually occur in the pleura and account for two-thirds of all cases; however, SFTs occurring in the prostate are extremely rare. Approximately 25 cases have been reported in the literature to date. This study reports the case of a [...] Read more.
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) usually occur in the pleura and account for two-thirds of all cases; however, SFTs occurring in the prostate are extremely rare. Approximately 25 cases have been reported in the literature to date. This study reports the case of a 43-year-old man referred to our hospital with the chief complaint of a pelvic tumor after careful examination. The tumor marker levels were within normal limits. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor, demonstrating primarily low signal intensity. It showed a capsule-like rim at the left lobe of the prostate, suggesting that the tumor was partially invading the rectal wall. Histopathological examination of needle-core biopsies showed spindle cell neoplasm with small and fusiform cells, strongly expressing signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) with a ramifying vascular network. Therefore, the clinical diagnosis of the patient was SFT of the prostate and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of spindle cells with patternless and staghorn patterns. Immunohistochemical analysis showed a strong expression of STAT6. Furthermore, the tumor was partially positive for CD34. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with SFT of the prostate. Two years after the initial diagnosis, the patient was alive with normal erectile function, continence status, and no evidence of the disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6238 KB  
Article
Combined Mass Spectrometry and Histopathology Imaging for Perioperative Tissue Assessment in Cancer Surgery
by Laura Connolly, Amoon Jamzad, Martin Kaufmann, Catriona E. Farquharson, Kevin Ren, John F. Rudan, Gabor Fichtinger and Parvin Mousavi
J. Imaging 2021, 7(10), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100203 - 4 Oct 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4326
Abstract
Mass spectrometry is an effective imaging tool for evaluating biological tissue to detect cancer. With the assistance of deep learning, this technology can be used as a perioperative tissue assessment tool that will facilitate informed surgical decisions. To achieve such a system requires [...] Read more.
Mass spectrometry is an effective imaging tool for evaluating biological tissue to detect cancer. With the assistance of deep learning, this technology can be used as a perioperative tissue assessment tool that will facilitate informed surgical decisions. To achieve such a system requires the development of a database of mass spectrometry signals and their corresponding pathology labels. Assigning correct labels, in turn, necessitates precise spatial registration of histopathology and mass spectrometry data. This is a challenging task due to the domain differences and noisy nature of images. In this study, we create a registration framework for mass spectrometry and pathology images as a contribution to the development of perioperative tissue assessment. In doing so, we explore two opportunities in deep learning for medical image registration, namely, unsupervised, multi-modal deformable image registration and evaluation of the registration. We test this system on prostate needle biopsy cores that were imaged with desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI) and show that we can successfully register DESI and histology images to achieve accurate alignment and, consequently, labelling for future training. This automation is expected to improve the efficiency and development of a deep learning architecture that will benefit the use of mass spectrometry imaging for cancer diagnosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1306 KB  
Article
Intraoperative Digital Analysis of Ablation Margins (DAAM) by Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy to Improve Partial Prostate Gland Cryoablation Outcomes
by Oscar Selvaggio, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Salvatore Mariano Bruno, Marco Recchia, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Francesca Sanguedolce, Paola Milillo, Luca Macarini, Ardeshir R. Rastinehad, Rafael Sanchez-Salas, Eric Barret, Franco Lugnani, Bernardo Rocco, Luigi Cormio and Giuseppe Carrieri
Cancers 2021, 13(17), 4382; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174382 - 30 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2826
Abstract
Partial gland cryoablation (PGC) aims at destroying prostate cancer (PCa) foci while sparing the unaffected prostate tissue and the functionally relevant structures around the prostate. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has boosted PGC, but available evidence suggests that ablation margins may be positive due [...] Read more.
Partial gland cryoablation (PGC) aims at destroying prostate cancer (PCa) foci while sparing the unaffected prostate tissue and the functionally relevant structures around the prostate. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has boosted PGC, but available evidence suggests that ablation margins may be positive due to MRI-invisible lesions. This study aimed at determining the potential role of intraoperative digital analysis of ablation margins (DAAM) by fluoresce confocal microscopy (FCM) of biopsy cores taken during prostate PGC. Ten patients with low to intermediate risk PCa scheduled for PGC were enrolled. After cryo-needles placement, 76 biopsy cores were taken from the ablation margins and stained by the urologist for FCM analysis. Digital images were sent for “real-time” pathology review. DAAM, always completed within the frame of PGC treatment (median time 25 min), pointed out PCa in 1/10 cores taken from 1 patient, thus prompting placement of another cryo-needle to treat this area. Standard HE evaluation confirmed 75 cores to be cancer-free while displayed a GG 4 PCa in 7% of the core positive at FCM. Our data point out that IDAAM is feasible and reliable, thus representing a potentially useful tool to reduce the risk of missing areas of PCa during PGC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2021)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1844 KB  
Article
Preference and Demand for Digital Pathology and Computer-Aided Diagnosis among Korean Pathologists: A Survey Study Focused on Prostate Needle Biopsy
by Soo Jeong Nam, Yosep Chong, Chan Kwon Jung, Tae-Yeong Kwak, Ji Youl Lee, Jihwan Park, Mi Jung Rho and Heounjeong Go
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7380; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167380 - 11 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3146
Abstract
Digital pathology systems (DPSs) have been globally implemented, and computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) software has been actively developed in recent years. This study aimed to investigate perceptions of digital pathology and the demand for CAD. An online survey involving members of the Korean Society [...] Read more.
Digital pathology systems (DPSs) have been globally implemented, and computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) software has been actively developed in recent years. This study aimed to investigate perceptions of digital pathology and the demand for CAD. An online survey involving members of the Korean Society of Pathologists was conducted, and a demonstration clip of the diagnostic assistant software for a prostate needle biopsy was shown to them to provide a simple experience with CAD. One hundred sixty-four Korean pathologists (13.6% of 1210 Korean pathologists) participated. The majority (77.4%) answered affirmatively regarding the necessity of implementing a DPS, and 26.8% had plans to implement or increase the use of DPSs in the following 2–3 years at their medical institutions. Pathologists felt that multidisciplinary care or conference accessibility (56.7%), remote consultation (49.4%), and big data building (32.9%) were useful parts of DPSs. Most pathologists (81.7%) responded that CAD software would assist with the diagnostic process. In a prostate needle biopsy, pathologists used the software to improve the measurement of tumor volume and/or length and core length but not to suggest a diagnostic name or Gleason grade. Korean pathologists who participated in the survey had highly positive perceptions of digital pathology and maintained a positive attitude toward the use of CAD software. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Anatomy and Pathophysiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1002 KB  
Review
Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers’ Clinical Utility in Diagnosis and Prognosis
by Milena Matuszczak, Jack A. Schalken and Maciej Salagierski
Cancers 2021, 13(13), 3373; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133373 - 5 Jul 2021
Cited by 64 | Viewed by 10169
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men worldwide. The current gold standard for diagnosing PCa relies on a transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic core needle biopsy indicated after detection changes in a digital rectal examination (DRE) and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men worldwide. The current gold standard for diagnosing PCa relies on a transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic core needle biopsy indicated after detection changes in a digital rectal examination (DRE) and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in the blood serum. PSA is a marker produced by prostate cells, not just cancer cells. Therefore, an elevated PSA level may be associated with other symptoms such as benign prostatic hyperplasia or inflammation of the prostate gland. Due to this marker’s low specificity, a common problem is overdiagnosis, which leads to unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment. This is associated with various treatment complications (such as bleeding or infection) and generates unnecessary costs. Therefore, there is no doubt that the improvement of the current procedure by applying effective, sensitive and specific markers is an urgent need. Several non-invasive, cost-effective, high-accuracy liquid biopsy diagnostic biomarkers such as Progensa PCA3, MyProstateScore ExoDx, SelectMDx, PHI, 4K, Stockholm3 and ConfirmMDx have been developed in recent years. This article compares current knowledge about them and their potential application in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Biomarkers in Body Fluids)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4884 KB  
Article
Sequential Colocalization of ERa, PR, and AR Hormone Receptors Using Confocal Microscopy Enables New Insights into Normal Breast and Prostate Tissue and Cancers
by Miguel Chenlo, Elvin Aliyev, Joana S. Rodrigues, Paula Vieiro-Balo, Manuel N. Blanco Freire, José Manuel Cameselle-Teijeiro and Clara V. Alvarez
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3591; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123591 - 30 Nov 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3509
Abstract
Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) use markers staining different cell populations applying widefield optical microscopy. Resolution is low not resolving subcellular co-localization. We sought to colocalize markers at subcellular level with antibodies validated for clinical diagnosis, including the single secondary antibody (combination of anti-rabbit/mouse-antibodies) used [...] Read more.
Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) use markers staining different cell populations applying widefield optical microscopy. Resolution is low not resolving subcellular co-localization. We sought to colocalize markers at subcellular level with antibodies validated for clinical diagnosis, including the single secondary antibody (combination of anti-rabbit/mouse-antibodies) used for diagnostic IHC with any primary antibody, and confocal microscopy. We explore colocalization in the nucleus (ColNu) of nuclear hormone receptors (ERa, PR, and AR) along with the baseline marker p63 in paired samples of breast and prostate tissues. We established ColNu mIHCF as a reliable technique easily implemented in a hospital setting. In ERa+ breast cancer, we identified different colocalization patterns (nuclear or cytoplasmatic) with PR and AR on the luminal epithelium. A triple-negative breast-cancer case expressed membrane-only ERa. A PR-only case was double positive PR/p63. In normal prostate, we identified an ERa+/p63+/AR-negative distinct population. All prostate cancer cases characteristically expressed ERa on the apical membrane of the AR+ epithelium. We confirmed this using ERa IHC and needle-core biopsies. ColNu mIHCF is feasible and already revealed a new marker for prostate cancer and identified sub-patterns in breast cancer. It could be useful for pathology as well as for functional studies in normal prostate and breast tissues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Cancer Diagnostic Evaluation and Biomarker Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3271 KB  
Article
Automated Gleason Scoring and Tumor Quantification in Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Images Using Deep Neural Networks and Its Comparison with Pathologist-Based Assessment
by Han Suk Ryu, Min-Sun Jin, Jeong Hwan Park, Sanghun Lee, Joonyoung Cho, Sangjun Oh, Tae-Yeong Kwak, Junwoo Isaac Woo, Yechan Mun, Sun Woo Kim, Soohyun Hwang, Su-Jin Shin and Hyeyoon Chang
Cancers 2019, 11(12), 1860; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121860 - 25 Nov 2019
Cited by 57 | Viewed by 8004
Abstract
The Gleason grading system, currently the most powerful prognostic predictor of prostate cancer, is based solely on the tumor’s histological architecture and has high inter-observer variability. We propose an automated Gleason scoring system based on deep neural networks for diagnosis of prostate core [...] Read more.
The Gleason grading system, currently the most powerful prognostic predictor of prostate cancer, is based solely on the tumor’s histological architecture and has high inter-observer variability. We propose an automated Gleason scoring system based on deep neural networks for diagnosis of prostate core needle biopsy samples. To verify its efficacy, the system was trained using 1133 cases of prostate core needle biopsy samples and validated on 700 cases. Further, system-based diagnosis results were compared with reference standards derived from three certified pathologists. In addition, the system’s ability to quantify cancer in terms of tumor length was also evaluated via comparison with pathologist-based measurements. The results showed a substantial diagnostic concordance between the system-grade group classification and the reference standard (0.907 quadratic-weighted Cohen’s kappa coefficient). The system tumor length measurements were also notably closer to the reference standard (correlation coefficient, R = 0.97) than the original hospital diagnoses (R = 0.90). We expect this system to assist pathologists to reduce the probability of over- or under-diagnosis by providing pathologist-level second opinions on the Gleason score when diagnosing prostate biopsy, and to support research on prostate cancer treatment and prognosis by providing reproducible diagnosis based on the consistent standards. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 546 KB  
Article
Perioperative Search for Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients Undergoing Prostate Brachytherapy for Clinically Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
by Hideyasu Tsumura, Takefumi Satoh, Hiromichi Ishiyama, Ken-ichi Tabata, Kouji Takenaka, Akane Sekiguchi, Masaki Nakamura, Masashi Kitano, Kazushige Hayakawa and Masatsugu Iwamura
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(1), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010128 - 11 Jan 2017
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 5719
Abstract
Despite the absence of local prostate cancer recurrence, some patients develop distant metastases after prostate brachytherapy. We evaluate whether prostate brachytherapy procedures have a potential risk for hematogenous spillage of prostate cancer cells. Fifty-nine patients who were undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) [...] Read more.
Despite the absence of local prostate cancer recurrence, some patients develop distant metastases after prostate brachytherapy. We evaluate whether prostate brachytherapy procedures have a potential risk for hematogenous spillage of prostate cancer cells. Fifty-nine patients who were undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy participated in this prospective study. Thirty patients with high-risk or locally advanced cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Twenty-nine patients with clinically localized cancer were treated with LDR brachytherapy without neoadjuvant ADT. Samples of peripheral blood were drawn in the operating room before insertion of needles (preoperative) and again immediately after the surgical manipulation (intraoperative). Blood samples of 7.5 mL were analyzed for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using the CellSearch System. While no preoperative samples showed CTCs (0%), they were detected in intraoperative samples in 7 of the 59 patients (11.8%; preoperative vs. intraoperative, p = 0.012). Positive CTC status did not correlate with perioperative variables, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, use of neoadjuvant ADT, type of brachytherapy, Gleason score, and biopsy positive core rate. We detected CTCs from samples immediately after the surgical manipulation. Further study is needed to evaluate whether those CTCs actually can survive and proliferate at distant sites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop