Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pemigatinib

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
58 pages, 2014 KB  
Review
FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies
by Zijie He, Yizhen Chen, Genglin Li, Jintao Wang, Yuxin Wang, Pengjie Tu, Yangyun Huang, Lilan Zhao, Xiaojie Pan, Hengrui Liu and Wenshu Chen
Cancers 2026, 18(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010089 - 27 Dec 2025
Viewed by 466
Abstract
Aberrations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) constitute a key oncogenic mechanism across multiple solid tumors, influencing tumor initiation, therapeutic response, and clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the molecular biology, signaling networks, and tumor-specific distribution of FGFR alterations, including amplifications, [...] Read more.
Aberrations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) constitute a key oncogenic mechanism across multiple solid tumors, influencing tumor initiation, therapeutic response, and clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the molecular biology, signaling networks, and tumor-specific distribution of FGFR alterations, including amplifications, point mutations, and gene fusions. The mechanistic basis of FGFR-driven tumor progression is discussed, including activation of downstream signaling pathways, crosstalk with other receptor tyrosine kinases, and regulation of the tumor microenvironment, angiogenesis, and immune escape. Recent development of selective FGFR inhibitors—such as pemigatinib, erdafitinib, and futibatinib—has translated mechanistic insights into measurable clinical benefits in genomically defined patient populations. However, acquired resistance remains a major challenge, driven by secondary mutations, activation of bypass pathways, and intratumoral heterogeneity. Integration of multi-omics profiling, liquid biopsy monitoring, and biomarker-guided patient selection is essential to optimize therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance. This review also highlights emerging therapeutic modalities, such as antibody–drug conjugates and nanotechnology-based delivery systems, which may improve target specificity and prolong therapeutic durability. By integrating molecular, translational, and clinical evidence, this review aims to establish a comprehensive framework for precision oncology strategies targeting FGFR-driven malignancies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 628 KB  
Review
Expanding Horizons in Cholangiocarcinoma: Emerging Targets Beyond FGFR2 and IDH1
by Lily Darman, Quinn Kaurich, Md Sazzad Hassan, Urs von Holzen and Niranjan Awasthi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(21), 10755; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110755 - 5 Nov 2025
Viewed by 2860
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary tract cancer that accounts for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. CCA is a “silent” disease that remains undetected for a long period of time, often presenting at an advanced stage with minimal treatment options and a poor [...] Read more.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary tract cancer that accounts for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. CCA is a “silent” disease that remains undetected for a long period of time, often presenting at an advanced stage with minimal treatment options and a poor prognosis. Advanced CCA remains largely inoperable, and combination gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients affected by this disease. There is a desperate need for new therapeutic alternatives, and extensive research is ongoing to address this gap. Targeted therapies represent a rapidly expanding area of cancer treatment and are currently under active investigation in CCA. The FDA has approved the targeted therapies ivosidenib, pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib, as well as the immunotherapy durvalumab, for patients with CCA in recent years. Several other therapeutic strategies are still under investigation, targeting molecular pathways including p53/MDM2, JAK/STAT, KRAS, HER2, VEGFR, PDGFR, MET, ALK, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, BRAF, and DNA damage repair signaling. While several promising advancements have been made, further research is required to improve outcomes for patients with CCA. This review provides an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of currently approved targeted therapies in CCA, as well as those under investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Latest Review Papers in Molecular Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2572 KB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signaling in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
by Yanyun Hong, Xiaodong Wang, Chunhui Shou and Xiaosun Liu
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(10), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100822 - 5 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1170
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are primarily driven by mutations in KIT (KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase) or PDGFRA (platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha), but resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib remains a major clinical challenge. Alterations [...] Read more.
Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are primarily driven by mutations in KIT (KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase) or PDGFRA (platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha), but resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib remains a major clinical challenge. Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), although rare, are emerging as important contributors to tumor progression and drug resistance. This review evaluates the molecular mechanisms, expression profiles, detection methods, and therapeutic implications of FGFR2 in GIST. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between January 2010 and June 2025, using combinations of keywords related to FGFR2, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, resistance mechanisms, gene fusion, amplification, polymorphisms, and targeted therapy. Eligible studies were critically assessed to distinguish GIST-specific data from evidence extrapolated from other cancers. Results:FGFR2 is expressed in multiple normal tissues and at variable levels in mesenchymal-derived tumors, including GIST. Its alterations occur in approximately 1–2% of GIST cases, most commonly as gene fusions (e.g., FGFR2::TACC2, <1%) or amplifications (1–2%); point mutations and clinically significant polymorphisms are extremely rare. These alterations activate the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways, contribute to bypass signaling, and enhance DNA damage repair, thereby promoting TKI resistance. Beyond mutations, mechanisms such as amplification, ligand overexpression, and microenvironmental interactions also play roles. FGFR2 alterations appear mutually exclusive with KIT/PDGFRA mutations but occasional co-occurrence has been reported. Current clinical evidence is largely limited to small cohorts, basket trials, or case reports. Conclusions:FGFR2 is an emerging oncogenic driver and biomarker of resistance in a rare subset of GISTs. Although direct evidence remains limited, particularly regarding DNA repair and polymorphisms, FGFR2-targeted therapies (e.g., erdafitinib, pemigatinib) show potential, especially in combination with TKIs or DNA-damaging agents. Future research should prioritize GIST-specific clinical trials, the development of FGFR2-driven models, and standardized molecular diagnostics to validate FGFR2 as a therapeutic target. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1867 KB  
Article
FGFR1 Inhibition by Pemigatinib Enhances Radiosensitivity in Glioblastoma Stem Cells Through S100A4 Downregulation
by Valérie Gouazé-Andersson, Caroline Delmas, Yvan Nicaise, Julien Nicolau, Juan Pablo Cerapio and Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
Cells 2025, 14(18), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14181427 - 11 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1613
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly heterogeneous tumor that frequently recurs despite surgery followed by radio-chemotherapy and, more recently, TTFields. This recurrence is largely driven by glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), which are intrinsically resistant to standard therapies. Identifying molecular targets that underlie [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly heterogeneous tumor that frequently recurs despite surgery followed by radio-chemotherapy and, more recently, TTFields. This recurrence is largely driven by glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), which are intrinsically resistant to standard therapies. Identifying molecular targets that underlie this resistance is therefore critical. Here, we investigated whether the inhibition of FGFR1, previously identified as a key mediator of GBM radioresistance, using pemigatinib, a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor, could enhance GSC radiosensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Pemigatinib treatment inhibited FGFR1 signaling, promoted proteasome-dependent FGFR1 degradation, and reduced the viability, neurosphere formation, and sphere size in GSCs with unmethylated MGMT, a subgroup known for poor response to standard treatments. In MGMT-unmethylated differentiated GBM cell lines, pemigatinib combined with temozolomide further enhanced radiosensitivity. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that pemigatinib treatment led to the downregulation of S100A4, a biomarker associated with mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and immune modulation in GBM. Functional studies confirmed that silencing S100A4 significantly improved GSCs’ response to irradiation. In vivo, pemigatinib combined with localized irradiation produced the longest median survival compared to either treatment alone in mice bearing orthotopic GSC-derived tumors, although the difference was not statistically significant. These findings support further clinical investigation to validate these preclinical findings and determine the potential role of FGFR inhibition as part of multimodal GBM therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1098 KB  
Article
Pemigatinib in the Real-World Management of Cholangiocarcinoma Through a Canadian Patient Support Program
by Philip Q. Ding, Vincent C. Tam, Ravi Ramjeesingh, Jamil Asselah, Brandon S. Sheffield, Taylor Mitchell, Anne-Julie Gaudreau, Jennifer J. Knox and Winson Y. Cheung
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070405 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 2253
Abstract
Background: In September 2021, pemigatinib received Health Canada approval for previously treated locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with FGFR2 rearrangements/fusions. This retrospective study aimed to characterize the real-world management and outcomes of patients with CCA receiving pemigatinib through a Canadian patient support program (PSP). [...] Read more.
Background: In September 2021, pemigatinib received Health Canada approval for previously treated locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with FGFR2 rearrangements/fusions. This retrospective study aimed to characterize the real-world management and outcomes of patients with CCA receiving pemigatinib through a Canadian patient support program (PSP). Methods: We evaluated a multi-centre case series of Canadian patients who were prescribed pemigatinib between September 2021 and January 2023 for eligible CCA diagnoses and enrolled in the PSP. The retrospective study data included demographic and disease-, treatment-, and outcome-related information, and these were collected using a survey of prescribing physicians. Results: Of the 26 patients who initiated pemigatinib in the PSP, we received survey responses for 18 (69%). Their median age was 57 years, 67% were female, 61% had stage IV disease, and 83% had intrahepatic CCA. Prior to pemigatinib, a partial hepatectomy was performed in 44% of the patients, and 66% of the patients received 2–4 prior lines of systemic therapy. All patients were treated with platinum-based regimens as the first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic disease. The median follow-up time on pemigatinib was 12.6 (range: 2.3–28.4) months, and their median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 12.1 months (95% CI 7.2-NR). The physician-assessed objective response and disease control rates were 56% and 89%, respectively. For the nine patients who discontinued pemigatinib, the median treatment duration was 10.6 months (range: 0.8–21.7). Disease progression was the most common reason for discontinuation (89%). None discontinued due to adverse events. Conclusions: Objective response rates, disease control rates, and a PFS comparable to that in the phase 2 FIGHT-202 trial was reported with pemigatinib use in this Canadian PSP cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biliary Tract Cancer Updates: Advancements and Insights)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 570 KB  
Review
Targetable Molecular Alterations in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers: An Overview of the Available Treatments
by Marine Valery, Damien Vasseur, Francesco Fachinetti, Alice Boilève, Cristina Smolenschi, Anthony Tarabay, Leony Antoun, Audrey Perret, Alina Fuerea, Thomas Pudlarz, Valérie Boige, Antoine Hollebecque and Michel Ducreux
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4446; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184446 - 6 Sep 2023
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 5049
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare tumours, most often diagnosed at an unresectable stage, associated with poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 10%. Only first- and second-line treatments are well codified with the combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy and immunotherapy followed [...] Read more.
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare tumours, most often diagnosed at an unresectable stage, associated with poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 10%. Only first- and second-line treatments are well codified with the combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy and immunotherapy followed by 5-FU and oxaliplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Many studies have shown that BTC, and more particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), have a high rate of targetable somatic alteration. To date, the FDA has approved several drugs. Ivosidenib targeting IDH1 mutations, as well as futibatinib and pemigatinib targeting FGFR2 fusions, are approved for pre-treated advanced CCA. The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib are approved for BRAFV600E mutated advanced tumours, NTRK inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib for tumours bearing NTRK fusion and prembrolizumab for MSI-H advanced tumours, involving a small percentage of BTC in these three settings. Several other potentially targetable alterations are found in BTC, such as HER2 mutations or amplifications or KRASG12C mutations and mutations in genes involved in DNA repair mechanisms. This review aims to clarify the specific diagnostic modalities for gene alterations and to summarize the results of the main trials and developments underway for the management of advanced BTC with targetable alterations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4587 KB  
Article
Targeting FGFRs Using PD173074 as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Cholangiocarcinoma
by Brinda Balasubramanian, Kiren Yacqub-Usman, Simran Venkatraman, Kyaw Zwar Myint, Jitlada Juengsamarn, Poowanai Sarkhampee, Nithi Lertsawatvicha, Jittiyawadee Sripa, Thiti Kuakpaetoon, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Kanokpan Wongprasert, Anna M. Grabowska, David O. Bates, Tavan Janvilisri and Rutaiwan Tohtong
Cancers 2023, 15(9), 2528; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092528 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4075
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an architecturally complex tumour with high heterogeneity. Discovery at later stages makes treatment challenging. However, the lack of early detection methodologies and the asymptomatic nature of CCA make early diagnosis more difficult. Recent studies revealed the fusions in Fibroblast Growth [...] Read more.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an architecturally complex tumour with high heterogeneity. Discovery at later stages makes treatment challenging. However, the lack of early detection methodologies and the asymptomatic nature of CCA make early diagnosis more difficult. Recent studies revealed the fusions in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs), a sub-family of RTKs, as promising targets for targeted therapy for CCA. Particularly, FGFR2 fusions have been of particular interest, as translocations have been found in approximately 13% of CCA patients. Pursuing this, Pemigatinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of FGFR, became the first targeted therapy drug to be granted accelerated approval by the FDA for treating CCA patients harbouring FGFR2 fusions who have failed first-line chemotherapy. However, despite the availability of Pemigatinib, a very limited group of patients benefit from this treatment. Moreover, as the underlying mechanism of FGFR signalling is poorly elucidated in CCA, therapeutic inhibitors designed to inhibit this pathway are prone to primary and acquired resistance, as witnessed amongst other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). While acknowledging the limited cohort that benefits from FGFR inhibitors, and the poorly elucidated mechanism of the FGFR pathway, we sought to characterise the potential of FGFR inhibitors in CCA patients without FGFR2 fusions. Here we demonstrate aberrant FGFR expression in CCA samples using bioinformatics and further confirm phosphorylated-FGFR expression in paraffinised CCA tissues using immunohistochemistry. Our results highlight p-FGFR as a biomarker to guide FGFR-targeted therapies. Furthermore, CCA cell lines with FGFR expression were sensitive to a selective pan-FGFR inhibitor, PD173074, suggesting that this drug can be used to suppress CCA cells irrespective of the FGFR2 fusions. Finally, the correlation analysis utilising publicly available cohorts suggested the possibility of crosstalk amongst the FGFR and EGFR family of receptors as they are significantly co-expressed. Accordingly, dual inhibition of FGFRs and EGFR by PD173074 and EGFR inhibitor erlotinib was synergistic in CCA. Hence, the findings from this study provide support for further clinical investigation of PD173074, as well as other FGFR inhibitors, to benefit a larger cohort of patients. Altogether, this study shows for the first time the potential of FGFRs and the importance of dual inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy in CCA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Biliary Tract Cancers Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1797 KB  
Article
A Rapid and Sensitive UPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Capmatinib in Human Liver Microsomes: Evaluation of Metabolic Stability by In Silico and In Vitro Analysis
by Mohamed W. Attwa, Ali S. Abdelhameed, Aishah M. Alsibaee and Adnan A. Kadi
Separations 2023, 10(4), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10040247 - 10 Apr 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3623
Abstract
Capmatinib (CMB) is an orally bioavailable mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) inhibitor approved by the US-FDA to treat metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. The current study aimed to establish a specific, rapid, and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography [...] Read more.
Capmatinib (CMB) is an orally bioavailable mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) inhibitor approved by the US-FDA to treat metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. The current study aimed to establish a specific, rapid, and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) analytical method for quantifying CMB in human liver microsomes (HLMs), with therapeutic implications for assessing metabolic stability. Validation of the UPLC-MS/MS analytical method in the HLMs was performed using selectivity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, extraction recovery, stability, and matrix effects according to the guidelines for bio-analytical method validation of the US-FDA. CMB was ionized by positive electrospray ionization (ESI) as the ionization source and analysed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) as the mass analyser mode. CMB and pemigatinib (PMT) were resolved on the C18 column, with an isocratic mobile phase. The CMB calibration curve showed linearity in the concentration range of 1–3000 ng/mL. The intra- and inter-day accuracy and precision were −7.67–4.48% and 0.46–6.99%, respectively. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.94 ng/mL confirmed the sensitivity of the UPLC-MS/MS analytical method. The intrinsic clearance (Clint) and in vitro half-life (t1/2) of CMB were 61.85 mL/min/kg and 13.11 min, respectively. CMB showed a high extraction ratio. The present study is the first to develop, establish, and standardize UPLC-MS/MS for the purpose of quantifying and evaluating the metabolic stability of CMB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Analysis of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 984 KB  
Protocol
Targeting FGFR Pathway Is Not an Effective Therapeutic Strategy in Patients with Unselected Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer Resistant to Trastuzumab
by Camilla Zecchetto, Alberto Quinzii, Simona Casalino, Marina Gaule, Camilla Pesoni, Valeria Merz, Silvia Pietrobono, Domenico Mangiameli, Martina Pasquato, Stefano Milleri, Simone Giacopuzzi, Maria Bencivenga, Anna Tomezzoli, Giovanni de Manzoni and Davide Melisi
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(3), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030508 - 11 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2282
Abstract
Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of patients with HER2+ advanced esophagogastric (EG) cancer. Nevertheless, patients frequently develop resistance. In preclinical models, we identified the overexpression of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) 3 as a mechanism potentially [...] Read more.
Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of patients with HER2+ advanced esophagogastric (EG) cancer. Nevertheless, patients frequently develop resistance. In preclinical models, we identified the overexpression of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) 3 as a mechanism potentially involved in trastuzumab-acquired resistance. FGFR inhibition could be a potential mechanism as a second-line treatment. In this Simon’s two-stage phase 2, single arm study, patients with advanced EG cancer refractory to trastuzumab-containing therapies received pemigatinib, an inhibitor of FGFR. The primary end point was the 12-week progression-free survival rate. Translational analyses were performed on tissue and plasma samples. Eight patients were enrolled in the first stage. Although the 6-week disease control rate was 25%, only one patient achieved a stable disease after 12 weeks of treatment. The trial was discontinued before the second stage. Two out of six evaluable tumor samples expressed FGFR3. No FGFRs amplification was detected. HER2 amplification was lost in three out of eight patients. Three patients had an high Tumor Mutational Burden, and two of them are significantly long-term survivors. These results do not support the therapeutic efficacy of targeting FGFR in unselected patients with advanced EG cancer, who are refractory to trastuzumab-containing therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Omics/Informatics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 811 KB  
Review
Evolution of the Targeted Therapy Landscape for Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Cholangiocarcinoma the ‘NSCLC’ of GI Oncology?
by Amol Gupta, Razelle Kurzrock and Jacob J. Adashek
Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1578; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051578 - 3 Mar 2023
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 26573
Abstract
In the past two decades, molecular targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of several malignancies. Lethal malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become a model for precision-matched immune- and gene-targeted therapies. Multiple small subgroups of NSCLC defined by their [...] Read more.
In the past two decades, molecular targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of several malignancies. Lethal malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become a model for precision-matched immune- and gene-targeted therapies. Multiple small subgroups of NSCLC defined by their genomic aberrations are now recognized; remarkably, taken together, almost 70% of NSCLCs now have a druggable anomaly. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Novel molecular alterations have been recently identified in patients with CCA, and the potential for targeted therapy is being realized. In 2019, a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) inhibitor, pemigatinib, was the first approved targeted therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic CCA who had FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangement. More regulatory approvals for matched targeted therapies as second-line or subsequent treatments in advanced CCA followed, including additional drugs that target FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. Recent tumor-agnostic approvals include (but are not limited to) drugs that target mutations/rearrangements in the following genes and are hence applicable to CCA: isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1); neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase (NTRK); the V600E mutation of the BRAF gene (BRAFV600E); and high tumor mutational burden, high microsatellite instability, and gene mismatch repair-deficient (TMB-H/MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. Ongoing trials investigate HER2, RET, and non-BRAFV600E mutations in CCA and improvements in the efficacy and safety of new targeted treatments. This review aims to present the current status of molecularly matched targeted therapy for advanced CCA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Signal-Processing in Tumor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2243 KB  
Review
Evolution of Treatment in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: Old and New towards Precision Oncology
by Maurizio Capuozzo, Mariachiara Santorsola, Loris Landi, Vincenza Granata, Francesco Perri, Venere Celotto, Oreste Gualillo, Guglielmo Nasti and Alessandro Ottaiano
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(23), 15124; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315124 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3904
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant neoplasm arising in the epithelium of the biliary tract. It represents the second most common primary liver cancer in the world, after hepatocellular carcinoma, and it constitutes 10–15% of hepatobiliary neoplasms and 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. As [...] Read more.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant neoplasm arising in the epithelium of the biliary tract. It represents the second most common primary liver cancer in the world, after hepatocellular carcinoma, and it constitutes 10–15% of hepatobiliary neoplasms and 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. As in other types of cancers, recent studies have revealed genetic alterations underlying the establishment and progression of CCA. The most frequently involved genes are APC, ARID1A, AXIN1, BAP1, EGFR, FGFRs, IDH1/2, RAS, SMAD4, and TP53. Actionable targets include alterations of FGFRs, IDH1/2, BRAF, NTRK, and HER2. “Precision oncology” is emerging as a promising approach for CCA, and it is possible to inhibit the altered function of these genes with molecularly oriented drugs (pemigatinib, ivosidenib, vemurafenib, larotrectinib, and trastuzumab). In this review, we provide an overview of new biologic drugs (their structures, mechanisms of action, and toxicities) to treat metastatic CCA, providing readers with panoramic information on the trajectory from “old” chemotherapies to “new” target-oriented drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 484 KB  
Review
New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma
by Katarzyna Szklener, Marek Mazurek, Małgorzata Wieteska, Monika Wacławska, Mateusz Bilski and Sławomir Mańdziuk
Cancers 2022, 14(21), 5377; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215377 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 74 | Viewed by 8577
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common histologic type of all gliomas and contributes to 57.3% of all cases. Despite the standard management based on surgical resection and radiotherapy, it is related to poor outcome, with a 5-year relative survival rate below 6.9%. In order [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma is the most common histologic type of all gliomas and contributes to 57.3% of all cases. Despite the standard management based on surgical resection and radiotherapy, it is related to poor outcome, with a 5-year relative survival rate below 6.9%. In order to improve the overall outcome for patients, the new therapeutic strategies are needed. Herein, we describe the current state of knowledge on novel targeted therapies in glioblastoma. Based on recent studies, we compared treatment efficacy measured by overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with selected potential antitumor drugs. The results of the application of the analyzed inhibitors are highly variable despite the encouraging conclusions of previous preclinical studies. This paper focused on drugs that target major glioblastoma kinases. As far, the results of some BRAF inhibitors are favorable. Vemurafenib demonstrated a long-term efficacy in clinical trials while the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib improves PFS compared with both vemurafenib and dabrafenib alone. There is no evidence that any MEK inhibitor is effective in monotherapy. According to the current state of knowledge, BRAF and MEK inhibition are more advantageous than BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Moreover, mTOR inhibitors (especially paxalisib) may be considered a particularly important group. Everolimus demonstrated a partial response in a significant proportion of patients when combined with bevacizumab, however its actual role in the treatment is unclear. Neither nintedanib nor pemigatinib were efficient in treatment of GBM. Among the anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab monotherapy was a well-tolerated option, significantly associated with anti-GBM activity in patients with recurrent GBM. The efficacy of aflibercept and pazopanib in monotherapy has not been demonstrated. Apatinib has been proven to be effective and tolerable by a single clinical trial, but more research is needed. Lenvatinib is under trial. Finally, promising results from a study with regorafenib may be confirmed by the ongoing randomized AGILE trial. The studies conducted so far have provided a relatively wide range of drugs, which are at least well tolerated and demonstrated some efficacy in the randomized clinical trials. The comprehensive understanding of the molecular biology of gliomas promises to further improve the treatment outcomes of patients. Full article
7 pages, 586 KB  
Perspective
Pemigatinib in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Work in Progress
by Gennaro Gadaleta-Caldarola, Alessandro Rizzo, Vincenzo Dadduzio, Lucia Lombardi, Arianna Gadaleta-Caldarola, Stefania Infusino, Antonio Cusmai, Claudia Citrigno and Gennaro Palmiotti
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(10), 7925-7931; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100626 - 19 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4131
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most frequent primary liver cancer, following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Progress in the molecular understanding of CCA has led to the development of several agents, including FGFR inhibitors, such as pemigatinib, whose approval has marked a new era in [...] Read more.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most frequent primary liver cancer, following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Progress in the molecular understanding of CCA has led to the development of several agents, including FGFR inhibitors, such as pemigatinib, whose approval has marked a new era in this hepatobiliary malignancy. However, a number of questions remain unanswered, including the development of secondary resistance and the role of combination therapies, including FGFR inhibitors. Herein, we specifically focus on the current challenges and future research directions of pemigatinib use in CCA patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Strategies in Cholangiocarcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 870 KB  
Review
Precision Medicine in Cholangiocarcinoma: Past, Present, and Future
by Chi-Yuan Cheng, Chiao-Ping Chen and Chiao-En Wu
Life 2022, 12(6), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060829 - 2 Jun 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4854
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or biliary tract cancer, has a poor prognosis. The median survival time among patients with CCA is under 2 years from diagnosis, and the global 5-year survival rate is only 10%. First-line therapy with chemotherapeutic agents, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, has traditionally [...] Read more.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or biliary tract cancer, has a poor prognosis. The median survival time among patients with CCA is under 2 years from diagnosis, and the global 5-year survival rate is only 10%. First-line therapy with chemotherapeutic agents, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, has traditionally been used to treat unresectable advanced CCA. In recent years, precision medicine has become a mainstream cancer treatment due to innovative next-generation sequencing technology. Several genetic alterations, including mutations, gene fusions, and copy number variations, have been found in CCA. In this review, we summarized the current understanding of genetic profiling in CCA and targeted therapy in CCA. Owing to the high heterogeneity of CCA, tumor microenvironmental factors, and the complexity of tumor biology, only pemigatinib, infigratinib, ivosidenib, larotrbctinib, and entrectinib are currently approved for the treatment of CCA patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (FGFR2) fusion, isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH1) mutation, and neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase gene (NRTK) fusion, respectively. Additional targeted therapies, including other FGFR2 inhibitors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, and BRAF-directed targeted therapy, have been discussed for the management of CCA, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly pembrolizumab, can be administered to patients with high microsatellite instability tumors. There is a further need for improvement in precision medicine therapies in the treatment of CCA and discuss the approved and potential targeted therapies for CCA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 697 KB  
Review
Changing Landscape of Systemic Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer
by Edward Woods, Dat Le, Bharath Kumar Jakka and Ashish Manne
Cancers 2022, 14(9), 2137; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092137 - 25 Apr 2022
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 6042
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are often diagnosed at advanced stages and have a grave outcome due to limited systemic options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC) has been the first-line standard for more than a decade. Second-line chemotherapy (CT) options are limited. Targeted therapy [...] Read more.
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are often diagnosed at advanced stages and have a grave outcome due to limited systemic options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC) has been the first-line standard for more than a decade. Second-line chemotherapy (CT) options are limited. Targeted therapy or TT (fibroblast growth factor 2 inhibitors or FGFR2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or IDH-1, and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase or NTRK gene fusions inhibitors) have had reasonable success, but <5% of total BTC patients are eligible for them. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as pembrolizumab is restricted to microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) patients in the first line. The success of the TOPAZ-1 trial (GC plus durvalumab) is promising, with numerous trials underway that might soon bring targeted therapy (pemigatinib and infrigatinib) and ICI combinations (with CT or TT in microsatellite stable cancers) in the first line. Newer targets and newer agents for established targets are being investigated, and this may change the BTC management landscape in the coming years from traditional CT to individualized therapy (TT) or ICI-centered combinations. The latter group may occupy major space in BTC management due to the paucity of targetable mutations and a greater toxicity profile. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop