Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (34)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = intravitreal corticosteroids

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1146 KiB  
Article
Predictive Value of Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers in Patients with Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema Undergoing Cataract Surgery Combined with a Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant
by Giuseppe Fasolino, Maryam Lazaar, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Silke Oellerich and Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill
Bioengineering 2025, 12(5), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12050556 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 744
Abstract
Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss among diabetic patients. The first-line treatments for DME are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-drugs, while intravitreal steroids are generally reserved for second-line treatment. Limited data exist on the role of [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss among diabetic patients. The first-line treatments for DME are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-drugs, while intravitreal steroids are generally reserved for second-line treatment. Limited data exist on the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers as predictors of success in non-responders to anti-VEGF treatment undergoing simultaneous cataract surgery and dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I). Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective analysis of patients with DME who were refractory to anti-VEGF treatment but underwent cataract surgery and received a DEX-I at the time of surgery. All procedures were performed between May 2021 and February 2024. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The following OCT-based biomarkers were also collected: ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), CST, and hyperreflective foci (HRF). Correlations between the baseline biomarkers and the anatomical outcome were analyzed using linear mixed models (LMMs). Results: Eleven patients (eighteen eyes) met the inclusion criteria. The mean CST decreased significantly from 469.4 ± 53.8 µm at baseline, to 373.1 ± 34.7 µm at 1 week (p = 0.002) and 354.4 ± 24.1 µm at 1 month (p = 0.011). The mean BCVA improved significantly from 0.47 LogMAR to 0.33 LogMAR at 1 week (p = 0.001), 0.23 LogMAR at 1 month (p < 0.001), and 0.25 LogMAR at 3 months (p < 0.001). Baseline predictors significantly influencing CST included the presence of DRIL, a disrupted/absent EZ, and a higher CST. Conclusions: The administration of DEX-I for DME refractory to anti-VEGF treatment in patients undergoing cataract surgery promoted functional improvements persisting longer than the anatomical ones. Patients presenting with DRIL, disrupted EZ, and higher CST at baseline may be better candidates for the combination of DEX-I and cataract surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2909 KiB  
Article
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Non-Infectious Uveitis
by Suji Yeo, Yoo-Ri Chung, Ji Hun Song, Bahram Bodaghi and Sara Touhami
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020248 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1176
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAI) is an intravitreal corticosteroid implant designed to have a therapeutic effect lasting up to 3 years. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of the FAI (0.19 mg, releasing at 0.2 μg/day) in patients [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAI) is an intravitreal corticosteroid implant designed to have a therapeutic effect lasting up to 3 years. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of the FAI (0.19 mg, releasing at 0.2 μg/day) in patients with non-infectious uveitis. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were last searched on 6 September 2024. Studies comparing FAI with sham injections were investigated. The primary outcome was the recurrence of uveitis. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and occurrence of cataracts. Results: Significantly more patients in the FAI group experienced no uveitis recurrence for up to 36 months compared to the sham group, with a relatively lower number of recurrences. Systemic adjuvant therapy was similar between groups, while fewer patients required local rescue injections in the FAI group (95% confidence interval (CI): −2.91 to −1.70). Visual acuity changes and the proportion of eyes with ≥15 letters gain were not significantly different between the groups. More patients needed cataract surgery in the FAI group (95% CI: 0.68–1.96). No differences were observed in IOP change, final IOP, or treatment-requiring events related to an increased IOP. However, more subjects experienced events of IOP > 25 mmHg with the FAI (95% CI: 0.73 to 2.14). Conclusions: The 0.19 mg FAI was effective in preventing uveitis recurrence, and reduced the need for local injections. No significant impacts were noted in terms of systemic therapy, visual improvement, or most IOP-related complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 328 KiB  
Review
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions: An Update
by Diana-Maria Darabuş, Rodica Georgiana Dărăbuş and Mihnea Munteanu
Biomedicines 2025, 13(1), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010105 - 5 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2574
Abstract
Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular condition and a significant contributor to vision loss worldwide, particularly in middle-aged and elderly populations. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical features of BRVO, alongside recent advancements in [...] Read more.
Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular condition and a significant contributor to vision loss worldwide, particularly in middle-aged and elderly populations. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical features of BRVO, alongside recent advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. BRVO is approximately four times more prevalent than central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and often leads to significant vision impairment. By focusing on BRVO, this review aims to address the specific challenges and advancements in its diagnosis and management. The pathophysiology of BRVO is complex, involving factors such as venous compression, inflammation, and increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Diagnostic approaches such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography are highlighted for their roles in assessing disease severity and guiding treatment decisions. Therapeutic interventions, including laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF therapy, and intravitreal corticosteroids, are critically evaluated, emphasizing emerging treatments such as gene therapy, peptide-based agents, and small-molecule inhibitors. Despite advancements in management strategies, the recurrence of macular edema and treatment resistance remain significant challenges. Continued research is essential to refine therapeutic protocols and improve long-term visual outcomes for patients with BRVO. Full article
11 pages, 540 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Following a Therapy Switch to Faricimab
by Peter Wolfrum, Elsa Wilma Böhm, Katrin Lorenz, Bernhard Stoffelns, Norbert Pfeiffer and Christina A. Korb
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4508; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154508 - 1 Aug 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1904
Abstract
Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF [...] Read more.
Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm3 to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3 (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4230 KiB  
Article
Hot-Melt Extrusion-Based Dexamethasone–PLGA Implants: Physicochemical, Physicomechanical, and Surface Morphological Properties and In Vitro Release Corrected for Drug Degradation
by Alireza (Allen) Ghaffari, Brock A. Matter, Rachel R. Hartman, David W. A. Bourne, Yan Wang, Stephanie Choi and Uday B. Kompella
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(7), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070895 - 4 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2190
Abstract
Developing bioequivalent (BE) generic products of complex dosage forms like intravitreal implants (IVIs) of corticosteroids such as dexamethasone prepared using hot-melt extrusion (HME), based on biodegradable poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) polymers, can be challenging. A better understanding of the relationship between the physicochemical and [...] Read more.
Developing bioequivalent (BE) generic products of complex dosage forms like intravitreal implants (IVIs) of corticosteroids such as dexamethasone prepared using hot-melt extrusion (HME), based on biodegradable poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) polymers, can be challenging. A better understanding of the relationship between the physicochemical and physicomechanical properties of IVIs and their effect on drug release and ocular bioavailability is crucial to develop novel BE approaches. It is possible that the key physicochemical and physicomechanical properties of IVIs such as drug properties, implant surface roughness, mechanical strength and toughness, and implant erosion could vary for different compositions, resulting in changes in drug release. Therefore, this study investigated the hypothesis that biodegradable ophthalmic dexamethasone-loaded implants with 20% drug and 80% PLGA polymer(s) prepared using single-pass hot-melt extrusion (HME) differ in physicochemical and/or physicomechanical properties and drug release depending on their PLGA polymer composition. Acid end-capped PLGA was mixed with an ester end-capped PLGA to make three formulations: HME-1, HME-2, and HME-3, containing 100%, 80%, and 60% w/w of the acid end-capped PLGA. Further, this study compared the drug release between independent batches of each composition. In vitro release tests (IVRTs) indicated that HME-1 implants can be readily distinguished by their release profiles from HME-2 and HME-3, with the release being similar for HME-2 and HME-3. In the early stages, drug release generally correlated well with polymer composition and implant properties, with the release increasing with PLGA acid content (for day-1 release, R2 = 0.80) and/or elevated surface roughness (for day-1 and day-14 release, R2 ≥ 0.82). Further, implant mechanical strength and toughness correlated inversely with PLGA acid content and day-1 drug release. Drug release from independent batches was similar for each composition. The findings of this project could be helpful for developing generic PLGA polymer-based ocular implant products. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Delivery and Controlled Release)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1908 KiB  
Article
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center
by Jasmin Abu Arif, Vitus André Knecht, Anne Rübsam, Vanessa Lussac, Zohreh Jami, Dominika Pohlmann, Bert Müller and Uwe Pleyer
Biomedicines 2024, 12(5), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12051106 - 16 May 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1997
Abstract
Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using [...] Read more.
Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Steroids and Their Derivatives as Potential Drugs for Medicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

45 pages, 761 KiB  
Review
The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When
by Maria Letizia Salvetat, Francesco Pellegrini, Leopoldo Spadea, Carlo Salati, Mutali Musa, Caterina Gagliano and Marco Zeppieri
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1327; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051327 - 26 Feb 2024
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4164
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion [...] Read more.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25–30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Clinical Treatment for Ocular Vascular Disease and Fundus Disease)
Show Figures

Figure A1

10 pages, 485 KiB  
Article
Management and Prognosis of Acute Post-Cataract Surgery Endophthalmitis: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis in Eastern China
by Xiuwen Zhang, Zhi Chen, Xiaoxia Li, Zimei Zhou, Maureen Boost, Taomin Huang and Xingtao Zhou
Antibiotics 2023, 12(12), 1670; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12121670 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2280
Abstract
Acute post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis (APSE) is a serious vision-threatening complication of cataract surgery. Analysis of the management and prognosis in cases of APSE may provide better guidance for future treatment. Fifty-six patients (56 eyes) diagnosed with APSE between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively [...] Read more.
Acute post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis (APSE) is a serious vision-threatening complication of cataract surgery. Analysis of the management and prognosis in cases of APSE may provide better guidance for future treatment. Fifty-six patients (56 eyes) diagnosed with APSE between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of APSE rate was 0.020% (95% CI: 0.011–0.029%). Intraocular cultures were positive in 18 (32.1%) cases, with 21 organisms isolated. Coagulase-negative staphylococci was the predominant isolate (12/21; 57.1%). The time from surgery to the onset of endophthalmitis was 7 days (interquartile range: 3–16) in patients with good best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (≥20/70) and 3 days (interquartile range: 1–8) in those with poor BCVA (<20/70). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that initial BCVA (logMAR) (p < 0.001), time from onset to initial intravitreal antibiotics (IVAs) (p < 0.001), and positive culture of highly virulent pathogens (p = 0.018) displayed significantly positive associations with the final BCVA (logMAR). Adjunctive use of intravitreal corticosteroids and systemic antibiotics were unrelated to a favorable final BCVA. In conclusion, the severity of the visual condition at baseline, as well as delayed treatment, are risk factors for poor visual outcomes in APSE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Antibiotics in Ophthalmology Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 800 KiB  
Review
The Role of Adjuvant Systemic and Intravitreal Corticosteroids in Fungal Endophthalmitis Treatment
by Jamal Azhari, Pedro S. Tetelbom and Ahmed B. Sallam
J. Fungi 2023, 9(12), 1147; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121147 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1959
Abstract
Endophthalmitis refers to inflammation involving internal ocular structures, including the anterior and posterior eye segments, associated with infectious agents, most commonly bacteria and fungi. This review focuses on endophthalmitis caused by fungi. Medical and surgical management are the two main treatment modalities for [...] Read more.
Endophthalmitis refers to inflammation involving internal ocular structures, including the anterior and posterior eye segments, associated with infectious agents, most commonly bacteria and fungi. This review focuses on endophthalmitis caused by fungi. Medical and surgical management are the two main treatment modalities for fungal endophthalmitis, with medical management utilizing systemic or intravitreal antifungals. The use of systemic or intravitreal corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment to dampen the severity of inflammation is controversial. Based on the pathobiology of fungal endophthalmitis as well as the mechanism of action of corticosteroids, it was hypothesized that corticosteroids affected the immune response against fungal infection. In vitro studies mostly carried out during the 1980s showed that dexamethasone plays a role in the suppression of phagocytosis of yeasts and demonstrated the facilitation of yeast proliferation by dexamethasone. In vivo studies analysis was compromised entirely of retrospective studies describing steroid use in fungal endophthalmitis, with the outcomes of the patients in these studies varying greatly and often being anecdotally noted, thus difficult to discern any definitive results. Given the limited clinical data and the heterogeneity of the existing studies, additional experimentation human studies with clinical trials or observations over more extended periods analyzing the effect of systemic and intravitreal corticosteroids in fungal endophthalmitis are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Eye Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

73 pages, 3632 KiB  
Review
Suprachoroidal Injection: A Novel Approach for Targeted Drug Delivery
by Kevin Y. Wu, Jamie K. Fujioka, Tara Gholamian, Marian Zaharia and Simon D. Tran
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(9), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16091241 - 1 Sep 2023
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 7589
Abstract
Treating posterior segment and retinal diseases poses challenges due to the complex structures in the eye that act as robust barriers, limiting medication delivery and bioavailability. This necessitates frequent dosing, typically via eye drops or intravitreal injections, to manage diseases, often leading to [...] Read more.
Treating posterior segment and retinal diseases poses challenges due to the complex structures in the eye that act as robust barriers, limiting medication delivery and bioavailability. This necessitates frequent dosing, typically via eye drops or intravitreal injections, to manage diseases, often leading to side effects with long-term use. Suprachoroidal injection is a novel approach for targeted drug delivery to the posterior segment. The suprachoroidal space is the region between the sclera and the choroid and provides a potential route for minimally invasive medication delivery. Through a more targeted delivery to the posterior segment, this method offers advantages over other routes of administration, such as higher drug concentrations, increased bioavailability, and prolonged duration of action. Additionally, this approach minimizes the risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events such as cataracts and intraocular pressure elevation via compartmentalization. This review focuses on preclinical and clinical studies published between 2019 and 2023, highlighting the potential of suprachoroidal injection in treating a variety of posterior segment diseases. However, to fully harness its potential, more research is needed to address current challenges and limitations, such as the need for technological advancements, refinement of injection techniques, and consideration of cost and accessibility factors. Future studies exploring its use in conjunction with biotech products, gene therapies, and cell-based therapies can lead to personalized treatments that can revolutionize the field of ophthalmology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic New Challenges in Ocular Drug Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 621 KiB  
Systematic Review
Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment—A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
by Justus G. Garweg, Judith Keiper, Isabel B. Pfister and Christin Schild
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(14), 4671; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144671 - 14 Jul 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1772
Abstract
Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD [...] Read more.
Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD (nAMD), if these were reported in detail. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, and CENTRAL using the following search terms: <Brolucizumab> AND <AMD> AND <intraocular inflammation>. The risk of bias was rated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. We included 31 reports (41 patients and 46 eyes). Patients were 75.9 ± 8.5 years, and 58.5% were female. IOI occurred 41.7 ± 37.5 (median 37.0) days after treatment initiation with 2.0 ± 1.3 (1–6) IVB injections. A mean change in visual acuity of −14.6 ± 21.0 (median −6.5) letters was reported. The mean time from first IOI signs to the initiation of any anti-inflammatory treatment was 3.3 ± 6.2 days, with 63% of the patients receiving systemic corticosteroids as standard treatment. Finally, a period effect was observed, with a change in visual acuity of −25.3 ± 27.1 and −2.6 ± 7.3 letters in the chronologically first and last third, respectively, of treated eyes (effect size: r = 0.71; p = 0.006). Functional outcomes markedly improved with increasing experience in managing IOI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Clinical Advances in Macular Degeneration and Retinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 656 KiB  
Review
The Evolution of Triamcinolone Acetonide Therapeutic Use in Retinal Diseases: From Off-Label Intravitreal Injection to Advanced Nano-Drug Delivery Systems
by Luis Abraham Aceves-Franco, Oscar Eduardo Sanchez-Aguilar, Allen Rafael Barragan-Arias, Marco Antonio Ponce-Gallegos, Jose Navarro-Partida and Arturo Santos
Biomedicines 2023, 11(7), 1901; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071901 - 5 Jul 2023
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5563
Abstract
Ophthalmic drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye has been challenging due to the complex ocular anatomy. Intravitreal injection of drugs was introduced to deliver therapeutic doses in the posterior segment. Different posterior segment diseases including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular [...] Read more.
Ophthalmic drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye has been challenging due to the complex ocular anatomy. Intravitreal injection of drugs was introduced to deliver therapeutic doses in the posterior segment. Different posterior segment diseases including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusions, uveitis, and cystoid macular edema, among others, have been historically treated with intravitreal corticosteroids injections, and more recently with intravitreal corticosteroids drug implants. Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is the most frequently used intraocular synthetic corticosteroid. Using nanoparticle-based TA delivery systems has been proposed as an alternative to intravitreal injections in the treatment of posterior segment diseases. From these novel delivery systems, topical liposomes have been the most promising strategy. This review is oriented to exhibit triamcinolone acetonide drug evolution and its results in treating posterior segment diseases using diverse delivery platforms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1477 KiB  
Article
Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of a Single Intravitreal Dexamethasone in Diabetic Macular Edema: An 8 Year Real-World Study
by Livia Faes, Amit V. Mishra, Veronika Lipkova, Konstantinos Balaskas, Chrystie Quek, Robin Hamilton, Ulrike Held, Dawn Sim, Sobha Sivaprasad and Dun Jack Fu
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(12), 3878; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123878 - 6 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1745
Abstract
Importance: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in patients with diabetes mellitus. Intravitreal dexamethasone is a treatment option for patients unsuitable for or non-responsive to anti-angiogenic agents. Objective: To quantify visual and anatomical outcomes from an initial intravitreal [...] Read more.
Importance: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in patients with diabetes mellitus. Intravitreal dexamethasone is a treatment option for patients unsuitable for or non-responsive to anti-angiogenic agents. Objective: To quantify visual and anatomical outcomes from an initial intravitreal dexamethasone injection over the expected 6-month period of dexamethasone release by the implant. Design and enrolment: This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of patients reviewed between 1 January 2012 and 1 April 2022. Setting: A tertiary eye-care center in London, United Kingdom; Moorfields Eye Hospital National Healthcare System Foundation Trust. Participants: The cohort comprised 418 adult patients with DME who received an initial treatment of 700 µg intravitreal dexamethasone in the study period. Of these, 240 patients met the inclusion criteria of ≥2 hospital visits following initial injection (≥1 beyond 6 months) and no previous ocular corticosteroid treatment or missing assessment at baseline. Exposure(s): Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (700 µg). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Probability of a positive visual outcome, defined as ≥5 or ≥10 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-letter gain after treatment when compared to baseline (Kaplan–Meier models). Results: From the initial intravitreal dexamethasone injection alone, we observed a >75% chance of gaining ≥5 ETDRS letters and >50% chance of gaining ≥10 ETDRS letters within 6 months. There was less than a 50% chance of sustaining either positive visual outcome beyond 4 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Most patients can be expected to have a positive visual outcome following an initial injection of dexamethasone implants that subsides within 4 months. Real-world re-treatment was observed to be delayed until after visual benefits were lost in half of the cohort. Further research will be needed to study the effects of delays in re-treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances and Prospects in Macular Edema)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3661 KiB  
Article
Fabrication and Characterisation of 3D-Printed Triamcinolone Acetonide-Loaded Polycaprolactone-Based Ocular Implants
by Febri Annuryanti, Juan Domínguez-Robles, Qonita Kurnia Anjani, Muhammad Faris Adrianto, Eneko Larrañeta and Raghu Raj Singh Thakur
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(1), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010243 - 11 Jan 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3995
Abstract
Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a corticosteroid that has been used to treat posterior segment eye diseases. TA is injected intravitreally in the management of neovascular disorders; however, frequent intravitreal injections result in many potential side effects and poor patient compliance. In this work, [...] Read more.
Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a corticosteroid that has been used to treat posterior segment eye diseases. TA is injected intravitreally in the management of neovascular disorders; however, frequent intravitreal injections result in many potential side effects and poor patient compliance. In this work, a 3D bioprinter was used to prepare polycaprolactone (PCL) implants loaded with TA. Implants were manufactured with different shapes (filament-, rectangular-, and circle-shaped) and drug loadings (5, 10, and 20%). The characterisation results showed that TA was successfully mixed and incorporated within the PCL matrix without using solvents, and drug content reached almost 100% for all formulations. The drug release data demonstrate that the filament-shaped implants (SA/V ratio~7.3) showed the highest cumulative drug release amongst all implant shapes over 180 days, followed by rectangular- (SA/V ratio~3.7) and circle-shaped implants (SA/V ratio~2.80). Most implant drug release data best fit the Korsmeyer–Peppas model, indicating that diffusion was the prominent release mechanism. Additionally, a biocompatibility study was performed; the results showed >90% cell viability, thus proving that the TA-loaded PCL implants were safe for ocular application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology in Ocular Drug Delivery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 1486 KiB  
Article
Influence of Intravitreal Therapy on Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema
by Patricia Udaondo Mirete, Carmen Muñoz-Morata, César Albarrán-Diego and Enrique España-Gregori
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(1), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010348 - 1 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3086
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the variation in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and its relationship with the variation in central macular thickness (CME) in response to intravitreal therapy with an antiangiogenic (anti-VEGF) drug or corticosteroid in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the variation in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and its relationship with the variation in central macular thickness (CME) in response to intravitreal therapy with an antiangiogenic (anti-VEGF) drug or corticosteroid in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Material and methods: This retrospective study included 70 eyes of 35 patients: 26 eyes received 4−5 intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 26 eyes were treated with a single intravitreal implant injection of dexamethasone, and 18 eyes without DME did not receive intravitreal therapy. SPECTRALIS® optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to measure the SFCT and CME before and at the end of the follow-up period. Results: The mean reductions in CME were 18.8 +/− 14.7% (aflibercept) and 29.7 +/− 16.9% (dexamethasone). The mean reductions in SFCT were 13.8 +/− 13.1% (aflibercept) and 19.5 +/− 9.6% (dexamethasone). The lowering effects of both parameters were significantly greater in the group treated with the dexamethasone implant (p = 0.022 and p = 0.046 for CMT and SFCT, respectively). Both therapies significantly decreased both CME and SFCT, independent of factors such as age, sex, previous intravitreal therapy, antidiabetic treatment, and the time of diabetes progression. There were no changes in the mean values of CME and SFCT in the untreated eyes. Conclusions: SFCT significantly decreased in response to intravitreal therapy with anti-VEGF or corticosteroids, irrespective of age, sex, previous intravitreal therapy, antidiabetic treatment, and the time of diabetes progression. There was a correlation between the changes in CME and SFCT after intravitreal therapy with aflibercept or dexamethasone implantation. SFCT was not a good predictor of the CME response but could be used to monitor the response to treatment. Local intravitreal therapy only affected the treated eye. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Challenges in Diabetic Retinopathy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop