Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,011)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gestation diabetes mellitus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 786 KiB  
Review
The Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Comprehensive Updated Narrative Review
by Asala Nasser, Dimitrios Papandreou, Sousana K. Papadopoulou and Leila Cheikh Ismail
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(8), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080148 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Vitamin D has emerged as a modulatory factor in the pathogenesis and management of diabetes mellitus due to its influence on pancreatic β-cell function, immune regulation, and inflammatory pathways. This narrative review critically examines mechanistic and clinical evidence linking vitamin D status with [...] Read more.
Vitamin D has emerged as a modulatory factor in the pathogenesis and management of diabetes mellitus due to its influence on pancreatic β-cell function, immune regulation, and inflammatory pathways. This narrative review critically examines mechanistic and clinical evidence linking vitamin D status with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and gestational diabetes (GDM). In T1DM, vitamin D’s immunomodulatory effects are thought to protect β-cells from autoimmune destruction; epidemiological studies associate vitamin D sufficiency with lower T1DM incidence and improved glycemic control, although causality remains under investigation. In T2DM, vitamin D deficiency is associated with worsened metabolic control and may contribute to disease development in at-risk individuals; however, it does not influence the initial onset of T2DM in patients who are already diagnosed. Intervention trials indicate that correcting the deficiency can modestly improve insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, and metabolic parameters. GDM has similarly been linked to hypovitaminosis D, with low maternal vitamin D levels associated with higher GDM risk and adverse perinatal outcomes; mechanistic insights suggest that adequate vitamin D supports glucose homeostasis in pregnancy, and emerging trials demonstrate improved insulin resistance with maternal vitamin D supplementation. Across these diabetes subtypes, maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels appears to confer metabolic benefits and may serve as an adjunct to current preventive and therapeutic strategies. However, definitive evidence from large-scale trials is required to establish optimal vitamin D supplementation protocols and confirm its efficacy in diabetes care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effect of Dietary Compounds on Inflammation-Mediated Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3032 KiB  
Article
Combined Bioinformatic and Experimental Approaches to Analyze miR-182-3p and miR-24-3p Expression and Their Target Genes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Iron Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy
by Badr Alzahrani, Bisma Rauff, Aqsa Ikram and Mariya Azam
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(8), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47080610 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 153
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are the most common pregnancy-related conditions resulting in adverse maternal and fetal complications. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), particularly miR-182-3p and miR-24-3p, are promising biomarkers as they act as regulatory elements in various diseases; however, their roles [...] Read more.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are the most common pregnancy-related conditions resulting in adverse maternal and fetal complications. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), particularly miR-182-3p and miR-24-3p, are promising biomarkers as they act as regulatory elements in various diseases; however, their roles in GDM and IDA are unclear. The present study aimed to analyze the expression and functional relevance of miR-182-3p and miR-24-3p in GDM and IDA. Experimental validation via RT-PCR revealed significant upregulation of both miRNAs in GDM and IDA samples. We identified common target genes and signaling pathways associated with these miRNAs, using a combination of data mining, bioinformatic tools (miRDB, TargetScan, miRTarBase, and miRWalk), and differentially expressed gene (DEGs) analysis using the GEO, OMIM, MalaCards, and GeneCards datasets. GO and KEGG pathway analyses revealed that the shared miRNA–mRNA in target genes were enriched in insulin signaling, apoptosis, and inflammatory pathways—key mechanisms implicated in GDM and IDA. Furthermore, hub genes such as IRS1, PIK3CA, CASP3, MAPK7, and PDGFRB were identified, supporting their central role in metabolic dysregulation during pregnancy. These findings demonstrate the potential of miR-182-3p and miR-24-3p as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in managing GDM and IDA, offering new insights into the molecular interplay underlying pregnancy complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics and Systems Biology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 685 KiB  
Article
Fetal Pancreatic Circumference as a Predictor of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus During 75 g OGTT
by Mehmet Can Keven, Ece Aydoğdu, Banu Derim Yeğen, Ebru Yucel, Zafer Bütün and Atakan Tanaçan
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5414; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155414 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 132
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the simultaneous 75 g Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and fetal pancreatic circumference at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Methods: This prospective case–control study was conducted between September [...] Read more.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the simultaneous 75 g Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and fetal pancreatic circumference at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Methods: This prospective case–control study was conducted between September 2024 and February 2025 at our perinatology clinic, which provides tertiary health care services. The correlation between the 75 g OGTT, GDM, and pancreatic circumference was assessed by comparing fetal pancreatic circumference between the groups with and without GDM at the time of diagnosis. Results: A total of 130 pregnant patients were recruited for this` study, with 64 patients forming the GDM group and 66 patients forming the control group. Fetal pancreas circumference (7.0 cm vs. 6.4 cm, p < 0.001), fetal pancreas circumference percentile (88.5 vs. 52, p < 0.001), and the rate of fetal pancreas size >90th percentile (15.6% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the GDM group compared to the control group. Conclusions: Although our findings demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between fetal pancreatic circumference and GDM, diagnostic performance remains modest. Therefore, fetal pancreatic circumference should be interpreted as a supportive marker, such as family history, rather than a definitive marker for identifying individuals at risk for GDM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Insights in Maternal–Fetal Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1160 KiB  
Review
Factors That May Affect Breast Milk Macronutrient and Energy Content: A Critical Review
by Inês Rocha-Pinto, Luís Pereira-da-Silva, Diana e Silva and Manuela Cardoso
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2503; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152503 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 390
Abstract
This review aimed to be comprehensive and to critically analyze the factors that may affect the macronutrient and energy content of breast milk. Systematic reviews were prioritized, even though other types of literature reviews on the subject, as well as studies not included [...] Read more.
This review aimed to be comprehensive and to critically analyze the factors that may affect the macronutrient and energy content of breast milk. Systematic reviews were prioritized, even though other types of literature reviews on the subject, as well as studies not included in these reviews, were included. Reported factors that potentially affect the macronutrient and energy content of breast milk comprise: maternal factors, such as age, nutritional status, dietary intake, smoking habits, lactation stage, circadian rhythmicity, and the use of galactagogues; obstetrical factors, such as parity, preterm delivery, multiple pregnancies, labor and delivery, and pregnancy morbidities including intrauterine growth restriction, hypertensive disorders, and gestational diabetes mellitus; and newborn factors, including sexual dimorphism, and anthropometry at birth. Some factors underwent a less robust assessment, while others underwent a more in-depth analysis. For example, the milk from overweight and obese mothers has been reported to be richer in energy and fat. A progressive decrease in protein content and an increase in fat content was described over time during lactation. The milk from mothers with hypertensive disorders may have a higher protein content. Higher protein and energy content has been found in early milk from mothers who delivered prematurely. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maternal Diet, Body Composition and Offspring Health)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
Association of SIRT1 Promoter Polymorphisms with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy-Related Complications in the Greek Population
by Sophia Letsiou, Eirini Prountzou, Despina Vougiouklaki, Maria Trapali, Michail Papapanou, Zoe Siateli, Konstantinos Ladias, Dimitra Houhoula and Panagiotis Halvatsiotis
Genes 2025, 16(8), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080886 - 27 Jul 2025
Viewed by 307
Abstract
Background/Objectives: SIRT1 is a NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase regulating metabolic and stress response pathways. Genetic variations in the SIRT1 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This case–control study investigates the associations of two SIRT1 promoter polymorphisms, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: SIRT1 is a NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase regulating metabolic and stress response pathways. Genetic variations in the SIRT1 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This case–control study investigates the associations of two SIRT1 promoter polymorphisms, rs12778366 and rs3758391, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, and healthy controls. Methods: This case–control study compared the genotypes between T2DM and pregnant and non-pregnant controls. We also compared genotypes between pregnant women with T2DM, GDM, preeclampsia, and healthy pregnant controls. Genomic DNA was extracted and analyzed using PCR-RFLP for the detection of rs12778366 and rs3758391 polymorphisms. Genotype frequencies were compared using chi-square tests, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: The study included 66 patients with T2DM, 36 with GDM, 12 with preeclampsia, and 81 pregnant and non-pregnant controls (33 pregnant controls). Although rs3758391 was more frequent in T2DM, the difference was not statistically significant between SIRT1 polymorphisms and T2DM. The CT genotype was more prevalent in T2DM (54.5%) compared to controls (33.4%); however, this difference was not significant. We finally found no significant association of the investigated SIRT1 polymorphisms with any of the conditions studied. In addition, the small sample size, especially for preeclampsia cases, limits the statistical power to detect significant associations. Conclusions: Although no significant association was observed between SIRT1 polymorphisms and diabetes, the findings of our study underscore the need for further studies examining SIRT1 polymorphisms in various ethnic groups, with a focus on leveraging these genetic variations in diabetes pathophysiology. Larger studies in the Greek population could also provide additional meaningful findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
15 pages, 319 KiB  
Systematic Review
Vitamin D Deficiency and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Western Countries: A Scoping Review
by Paola Correa, Hirukshi Bennett, Nancy Jemutai and Fahad Hanna
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2429; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152429 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 371
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication globally. Maternal vitamin D deficiency has been linked to the risk of GDM. The aim of this study was to explore and synthesise current evidence on the association between vitamin D deficiency and [...] Read more.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication globally. Maternal vitamin D deficiency has been linked to the risk of GDM. The aim of this study was to explore and synthesise current evidence on the association between vitamin D deficiency and the development of gestational diabetes in Western countries. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search across seven databases: ProQuest Public Health, Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, The Lancet, BMC Public Health, the International Journal of Women’s Health, and Scopus. Studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria relevant to the research question. The review followed the JBI protocol, and the PRISMA flowchart was used to guide and visualise the study selection process. Results: Nineteen studies were included in the final analysis, comprising research predominantly from Australia (5), the United States (5), and Canada (4). The findings indicate a notable association between vitamin D deficiency and GDM risk, moderated by factors such as maternal age, ethnicity, seasonal variation, and body mass index (BMI). Older maternal age and higher BMI were linked with lower vitamin D levels and a higher incidence of GDM. Ethnic groups with darker skin tones showed higher rates of vitamin D deficiency, increasing vulnerability to GDM. Seasonal patterns revealed lower vitamin D levels during winter months, correlating with greater GDM risk. These patterns underscore the need for targeted preventive strategies, including the potential role of vitamin D supplementation. Conclusions: This review supports an observed association between maternal vitamin D deficiency and increased GDM risk, influenced by demographic and environmental factors. While the evidence points to a potential preventative role for vitamin D, further high-quality research, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, is essential to establish causality and inform clinical guidelines. The review identifies knowledge gaps and suggests directions for future research and clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Diabetes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 663 KiB  
Review
Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Head and Neck Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
by Filipa Formosinho, Alexandra Arcanjo and Maria Conceição Manso
Oral 2025, 5(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5030052 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1232
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence links diabetes to increased cancer risk. This study aimed to assess the association between diabetes mellitus (DM)(type 1, type 2, or gestational) and the development of head and neck cancer. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted using systematic searches in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence links diabetes to increased cancer risk. This study aimed to assess the association between diabetes mellitus (DM)(type 1, type 2, or gestational) and the development of head and neck cancer. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted using systematic searches in Cochrane, EBSCO, Wiley, ScienceDirect, and PubMed (January 2000–January 2024), registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024512151). Included were systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of observational studies. Article selection followed the PRISMA guidelines; the quality and risk of bias of the selected studies were assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. The GROOVE tool was used to identify double counting. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third resolving disagreements. Results: Seven SRs were included. While DM has been widely examined in cancer research, few studies specifically targeted head and neck cancers. Of the 20 associations between various cancer sites and diabetes types, 9 (45%) showed a statistically significant positive correlation. The strongest evidence was for overall cancer risk (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.16–1.29, p < 0.001). Oral cancer showed elevated risks (RRR = 1.13, p = 0.009; OR = 1.32, p < 0.001; HR = 1.73, p < 0.05; RR = 1.28, p < 0.05). Increased risks were also observed for oropharyngeal (RR = 1.18; HR = 1.53), head and neck (HR = 1.47), and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR = 1.40), all p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was low in two reviews, unreported in one, and high in four. Five SRs reported associated risk factors. Conclusions: While some associations between DM and cancer appear significant, evidence remains limited and inconsistent, particularly for oral cancer. Further standardized, high-quality research is needed to clarify the link across head and neck cancer subtypes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 857 KiB  
Article
Placental Expression of Sirtuins in Women with Gestational Diabetes
by Michał Czerewaty, Łukasz Ustianowski, Kajetan Kiełbowski, Estera Bakinowska, Krzysztof Safranow, Maciej Tarnowski, Tomasz Sroczyński and Andrzej Pawlik
Genes 2025, 16(7), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070844 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 365
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder in pregnant women. It can lead to several complications, such as preterm delivery, macrosomia, or metabolic disorders in newborns. Studies have revealed morphological and transcriptional differences between the placentas of patients with GDM [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder in pregnant women. It can lead to several complications, such as preterm delivery, macrosomia, or metabolic disorders in newborns. Studies have revealed morphological and transcriptional differences between the placentas of patients with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance. Sirtuins (SIRTs) are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent deacetylases that interact with and regulate the activity of numerous proteins. However, little is known about their role in the pathogenesis of GDM. This study was performed to analyze the placental expression of SIRTs and investigate their correlations with clinical parameters. Methods: GDM was diagnosed based on the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in accordance with the criteria developed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups. Placental tissues were collected, and the expression of SIRT1,-3,-4 and a reference gene (β-2 microglobulin) was analyzed. Results: The placental expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3 was elevated in women with GDM. However, there was no significant difference in SIRT4 expression between women with GDM and those with normal glucose tolerance. Furthermore, we found no significant correlations between SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT4 expression and clinical parameters. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate elevated expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3 in the placentas of women with GDM. Further studies are required to confirm our observations and demonstrate the precise role of these enzymes in GDM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 380 KiB  
Article
Association Between Carbohydrate Quality Index During Pregnancy and Risk for Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: Results from the BORN 2020 Study
by Antigoni Tranidou, Antonios Siargkas, Ioannis Tsakiridis, Emmanouela Magriplis, Aikaterini Apostolopoulou, Michail Chourdakis and Themistoklis Dagklis
Children 2025, 12(7), 955; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12070955 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To assess the association between early pregnancy carbohydrate quality, as measured by the Carbohydrate Quality Index (CQI), and the risk of delivering a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant in a Mediterranean pregnant cohort of northern Greece. Methods: We analyzed singleton pregnancies from [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To assess the association between early pregnancy carbohydrate quality, as measured by the Carbohydrate Quality Index (CQI), and the risk of delivering a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant in a Mediterranean pregnant cohort of northern Greece. Methods: We analyzed singleton pregnancies from the BORN 2020 prospective cohort in Greece. Dietary intake was assessed via a validated food frequency questionnaire, and CQI was computed from glycemic index, fiber density, whole-to-refined grain ratio, and solid-to-liquid carbohydrate ratio. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between CQI (in tertiles) and LGA risk, defined as birthweight >90th percentile. Results: Among the 797 participants, 152 (19.1%) delivered LGA infants, and 117 (14.7%) were diagnosed with GDM. Of those with GDM, 23 (19.7%) delivered LGA infants. In the total population, higher maternal weight (p < 0.001), height (p = 0.006), and pre-pregnancy BMI (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with LGA. A greater proportion of women with LGA had a BMI > 25 (p = 0.007). In the GDM subgroup, maternal height remained significantly higher in those who delivered LGA infants (p = 0.017). In multivariable models, moderate CQI was consistently associated with increased odds of LGA across all models (Model 1: aOR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.03–2.50), p = 0.037, Model 2: aOR = 1.57 (95% CI: 1.01–2.46), p = 0.046, Model 3: aOR = 1.58 (95% CI: 1.01–2.47), p = 0.044, Model 4 aOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.08–2.72; p = 0.023), whereas high CQI was not. In the GDM subgroup, a significant association between high CQI and increased LGA risk was observed in less adjusted models (Model 1 aOR: 6.74; 95% CI: 1.32–56.66; p = 0.039, Model 2 aOR: 6.64; 95% CI: 1.27–57.48; p = 0.044), but this was attenuated and became non-significant in the fully adjusted model (aOR: 3.05; 95% CI: 0.47–30.22; p = 0.28). When examining CQI components individually, no consistent associations were observed. Notably, a higher intake of low-quality carbohydrates (≥50% of energy intake) was significantly associated with increased LGA risk in the total population (aOR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.53–11.67; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Higher early pregnancy intake of low-quality carbohydrates was associated with an elevated risk of LGA in the general population. However, CQI itself showed a non-linear and inconsistent relationship with LGA, with moderate, but not high, CQI linked to increased risk, particularly in GDM pregnancies, where associations were lost after adjustment. Both carbohydrate quality and quantity evaluations are essential, particularly in high-risk groups, to inform dietary guidance in pregnancy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Maternal and Fetal Health (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1017 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review of Nutritional Guidelines for the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Global Comparison
by Angelo Sirico, Maria Giovanna Vastarella, Eleonora Ruggiero and Luigi Cobellis
Nutrients 2025, 17(14), 2356; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17142356 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 7–9% of pregnancies worldwide and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Nutritional therapy is a key component of GDM management. However, inconsistencies exist across international and national guidelines regarding macronutrient distribution, glycemic targets, and micronutrient [...] Read more.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 7–9% of pregnancies worldwide and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Nutritional therapy is a key component of GDM management. However, inconsistencies exist across international and national guidelines regarding macronutrient distribution, glycemic targets, and micronutrient supplementation. This systematic review aims to compare updated nutritional recommendations for GDM across major health organizations and identify areas of consensus, divergence, and evidence gaps. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251026194). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (concluding March 2025), along with manual searches of official websites of professional health organizations (e.g., ADA, WHO, NICE, IDF). Guidelines published within the last 10 years (or the most relevant national guideline if slightly older), available in English or with access to translation, and including explicit nutritional recommendations for GDM were included. Data were extracted on macronutrient composition, glycemic targets, and micronutrient supplementation, with evaluation of the supporting evidence and regional context, incorporating findings from recent key guideline updates. Results: In total, 12 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. While all guidelines emphasized carbohydrate moderation and adequate fiber intake, significant discrepancies were found in carbohydrate quality recommendations (e.g., low-glycemic index focus vs. total carbohydrate restriction), postprandial glucose targets (e.g., 1-h vs. 2-h measurements and varying thresholds like <120 vs. <140 mg/dL), and the use of non-routine micronutrients such as chromium, selenium, and omega-3 fatty acids (generally lacking endorsement). Recent updates from key bodies like ADA, Diabetes Canada, and KDA largely maintain these core stances but show increasing emphasis on dietary patterns and acknowledgement of CGM technology, without resolving key discrepancies. Cultural adaptability and behavioral counselling strategies were minimally addressed across most guidelines. Conclusions: Despite general agreement on the principal recommendations of nutritional management in GDM, substantial variation persists in specific recommendations, even considering recent updates. Consistent, evidence-based, and culturally adaptable guidelines incorporating implementation strategies are needed to optimize care and reduce disparities in GDM management across regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 511 KiB  
Systematic Review
Trimester-Specific Serum Lipid Profiles in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
by Milos Milincic, Andja Cirkovic, Katarina Ivanovic, Stefan Dugalic and Miroslava Gojnic Dugalic
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1290; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071290 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 321
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major public health concern associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. It was found that even physiological pregnancy is followed by a significant shift in serum lipid profile, and even more pronounced in [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major public health concern associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. It was found that even physiological pregnancy is followed by a significant shift in serum lipid profile, and even more pronounced in GDM pregnancies. We aimed to comprehensively assess lipid parameters among pregnant women with and without GDM. Materials and Methods: A systematic review, covering PubMed, WoS, and SCOPUS until 23 July 2024, with meta-analysis and meta-regression, was conducted, comprising studies measuring TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, VLDL-C, and TG/HDL ratio in pregnant women diagnosed with GDM, and those with normal glucose tolerance. The overall effect size measure was the SMD. NOS and JADAD scales were used for quality assessment, I2 statistics for heterogeneity evaluation, and funnel plots for publication bias inspection. Results: A total of 457 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 74, 277, and 122 studies were included in the quantitative analysis for the 1st 2nd, and 3rd trimester, respectively. TG and TG/HDL levels were significantly elevated in all three trimesters (TG: SMD = 0.61, 0.57, and 0.48, p < 0.001 for all, and TG/HDL: SMD = 0.44, 0.66, and 0.49; p < 0.001 for all), while TC and LDL-C levels showed significant increases in the 1st and 2nd trimesters (TC: SMD = 0.38, 0.27, p < 0.001 for both, LDL-C: SMD = 0.33, 0.20, p < 0.001 for both), in pregnant women with GDM compared to those without the condition. Conclusions: GDM is associated with significant lipid abnormalities, particularly elevated TG and decreased HDL-C levels. These lipid changes are most pronounced in the first and second trimesters, highlighting the importance of early detection and management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 705 KiB  
Article
Diabetes Risk Perception in Women with a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis from a Belgian Randomized Controlled Trial (MELINDA Study)
by Yana Vanlaer, Caro Minschart, Ine Snauwaert, Nele Myngheer, Toon Maes, Christophe De Block, Inge Van Pottelbergh, Pascale Abrams, Wouter Vinck, Liesbeth Leuridan, Sabien Driessens, Jaak Billen, Christophe Matthys, Annick Bogaerts, Annouschka Laenen, Chantal Mathieu and Katrien Benhalima
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4998; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144998 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 323
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To evaluate diabetes risk perception in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prediabetes in early postpartum. Methods: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of a mobile-based postpartum lifestyle intervention in women with prediabetes after [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate diabetes risk perception in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prediabetes in early postpartum. Methods: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of a mobile-based postpartum lifestyle intervention in women with prediabetes after GDM. Data were collected from the Risk Perception Survey for Developing Diabetes at baseline (6–16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. Logistic regression was used to analyze the difference between the intervention and control groups on diabetes risk estimation. Results: Among 165 women with prediabetes in early postpartum (mean age: 32.1 years, mean BMI: 27.3 kg/m2), 58.9% (96) adequately estimated their diabetes risk (moderate or high chance) at baseline. These women smoked less often [2.06% (2) vs. 10.3% (7), p = 0.034], reported less anxiety (11.6 ± 3.0 vs. 12.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.040), and reported fewer symptoms of depression [30.9% (21) vs. 15.6% (15), p = 0.023] compared to women who underestimated their risk. At one year, 58.3% (95) of all women adequately estimated their diabetes risk. In the intervention group, 50.6% (41) adequately estimated their risk at baseline, increasing to 56.8% (46) by the end of the intervention after one year (p = 0.638). In the control group, a higher proportion of women adequately estimated their risk at baseline [67.1% (55), (p = 0.039)], which decreased to 59.8% (49) at one year (p = 0.376), with no significant difference in risk perception between the groups at one year (p = 0.638). Conclusions: Almost 60% of this high-risk population adequately estimated their diabetes risk, with no significant impact of the lifestyle intervention on risk perception. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gestational Diabetes: Cutting-Edge Research and Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2181 KiB  
Review
Incorporating Morphological Evaluations into Breeding Soundness Examinations for Female Dogs
by Dane Wells Schwartz, Jonah Kvernum, Naomie Macias, Muhammed Salman Waqas and Michela Ciccarelli
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142045 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 687
Abstract
This article highlights the importance of evaluating the morphological characteristics of female dogs during breeding soundness examinations (BSEs) to assess their reproductive potential and ensure the health of future offspring. Key traits considered in this evaluation include body type, body condition score, skull [...] Read more.
This article highlights the importance of evaluating the morphological characteristics of female dogs during breeding soundness examinations (BSEs) to assess their reproductive potential and ensure the health of future offspring. Key traits considered in this evaluation include body type, body condition score, skull size and shape, mammary gland conformation, and coat quality. Each of these factors plays a significant role in the health and fertility of breeding females. For example, deviations from breed standards in body size can lead to complications during pregnancy and whelping, while an inappropriate body condition score may disrupt hormonal balance and reproductive cycles. This review also addresses concerns related to brachycephalic breeds, whose conformation can contribute to respiratory and reproductive issues. Additionally, assessing vertebral and pelvic conformation is crucial to prevent dystocia and other complications during delivery. By systematically evaluating these morphological traits, veterinarians can promote ethical breeding practices that prioritize the welfare and genetic health of both breeding females and their puppies. Therefore, integrating comprehensive morphological evaluations into BSEs is essential for responsible dog breeding management, ultimately supporting better reproductive outcomes and healthier future generations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1450 KiB  
Article
Polyhydramnios at Term in Gestational Diabetes: Should We Be Concerned?
by Mercedes Horcas-Martín, Tania Luque-Patiño, Claudia Usandizaga-Prat, Elena Díaz-Fernández, Victoria Melero-Jiménez, Luis Vázquez-Fonseca, Francisco Visiedo, José Román Broullón-Molanes, Rocío Quintero-Prado and Fernando Bugatto
Children 2025, 12(7), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12070920 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 455
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pregnancies complicated by idiopathic polyhydramnios are linked to a heightened risk of numerous maternal and perinatal complications. We aim to study the implications of polyhydramnios in term pregnancies complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: A prospective cohort study including 340 GDM [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pregnancies complicated by idiopathic polyhydramnios are linked to a heightened risk of numerous maternal and perinatal complications. We aim to study the implications of polyhydramnios in term pregnancies complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: A prospective cohort study including 340 GDM cases was conducted. An ultrasound scan was conducted at term between 37 and 40 weeks and amniotic fluid volume (AFV) was assessed by measuring the amniotic fluid index (AFI) and the single deepest pocket (SDP). Maternal demographics and obstetric and perinatal outcomes were evaluated after delivery. We performed comparisons between groups with normal AFV and polyhydramnios (AFI ≥ 24 cm or SDP ≥ 8 cm), and between groups with normal and increased AFV (AFI or SDP ≥ 75th centile). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study association between AVF measurements and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: We found that women with GDM and polyhydramnios at term had a higher risk of maternal (54.3 vs. 27.5%, p < 0.001) and perinatal adverse outcomes (65.7% vs. 46.5%, p < 0.03). The increased AFV group showed a higher risk of fetal overgrowth (LGA: 21.4% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001 and macrosomia: 19.8% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001, respectively) and a lesser risk of delivering an SGA fetus (6.3% vs. 13.6%, respectively). Both AFI and SDP showed a significant correlation with newborn weight (r = 0.27; p < 0.001 and r = 0.28; p < 0.001, respectively) and newborn centile (r = 0.26; p < 0.001 and r = 0.26 for both). Subsequent to conducting a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for pregestational BMI, nulliparity, and insulin treatment, both AFI and SDP were significantly associated with perinatal complications, but AFI showed a stronger association with fetal overgrowth (aOR 1.11; p = 0.004 for a LGA fetus and aOR 1.12; p = 0.002 for macrosomia) and with lower risk of delivering an SGA fetus (aOR 0.89; p = 0.009) or IUGR fetus (aOR 0.86; p = 0.03). ROC analysis showed a poor diagnostic performance of both AFI and SDP for identifying macrosomia (AUC 0.68 for AFI, and 0.65 for SDP). Conclusions: Detection of polyhydramnios at term, whether using AFI or SDP, identifies a subgroup of women with gestational diabetes with higher risks of obstetric and perinatal complications. Cases with increased AFV (AFI ≥ 18 cm or SDP ≥ 6.5 cm) are also associated with an increased risk of fetal overgrowth and may require more intensive monitoring for management and optimal delivery timing, with the aim of improve perinatal outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Prenatal Diagnosis and Their Impact on Neonatal Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2231 KiB  
Review
The Association Between Chemerin Levels and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Hitham Aldharee, Yousif R. Makki and Hamdan Z. Hamdan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146622 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 278
Abstract
Chemerin is an adipokine that is associated with insulin resistance, a feature well marked in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Recent publications and meta-analyses investigating chemerin levels in GDM remain inconclusive. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to update the current evidence of [...] Read more.
Chemerin is an adipokine that is associated with insulin resistance, a feature well marked in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Recent publications and meta-analyses investigating chemerin levels in GDM remain inconclusive. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to update the current evidence of an association between chemerin and GDM. The databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for eligible articles from their inception up to 1 April 2025. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the chemerin levels between GDM cases and normoglycemic controls were calculated using the “meta” package in “R” software. Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising a total of 1735 GDM cases and 1701 normoglycemic pregnant controls. Due to significant heterogeneity, a random effects model was applied, and the chemerin levels were found to be significantly higher in cases compared to normoglycemic controls [SMD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.16; 1.78) ng/mL; p = 0.020]. Subgroup analysis showed that studies conducted in Asia, studies utilizing a case–control design, patients younger than 30 years, and patients with a BMI less than 28 showed significantly higher chemerin levels in cases compared to controls. Meta-regression analysis indicated that only patients over 30 years old showed a negative association with chemerin levels. No evidence of publication bias was observed. This updated meta-analysis confirmed that chemerin levels are elevated in cases of GDM, which may indicate its involvement in the pathogenesis of GDM. Further longitudinal studies are needed to consolidate this finding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop