Search Results (199)

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. A subset of patients develops non-metastatic, castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC), for which management requires a personalized consideration for appropriate treatment. However, there is no consensus regarding when to switch from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to more aggressive treatments like abiraterone or enzalutamide. Methods: We analyzed 5037 nmCRPC patients and employed a Weibull Time to Event Recurrent Neural Network to identify patients who would benefit from switching from ADT to abiraterone/enzalutamide. We evaluated this model using differential treatment benefits measured by the Kaplan–Meier estimation and milestone probabilities. Results: The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.738 (standard deviation (SD): 0.057) for patients treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide and 0.693 (SD: 0.02) for patients exclusively treated with ADT at the 2-year milestone. The model recommended 14% of ADT patients switch to abiraterone/enzalutamide. Analysis showed a statistically significant absolute improvement using model-recommended treatments in progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23–0.24) at the 2-year milestone (PFS rate increasing from 0.50 to 0.74) with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.39–0.50). Conclusions: Our model successfully identified nmCRPC patients who would benefit from switching to abiraterone/enzalutamide, demonstrating potential outcome improvements. Full article

Purpose: The identification of cardiovascular risk factors in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients prior to the initiation of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) is important yet challenging. Methods and Results: A nationwide cohort study was conducted utilizing data from the National Health Insurance Research Database containing the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The study population comprised 4739 PCa patients who received abiraterone or enzalutamide between 1 January 2014, and 28 February 2022. The cohort was divided into a training set (n = 3318) and a validation set (n = 1421). Machine learning techniques with random survival forest (RSF) model incorporating 16 variables was developed to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Over a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years, MACEs occurred in 10.9% and 11.3% of the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The RSF model identified five key predictive indicators: age < 65 or ≥75 years, heart failure, stroke, hypertension, and myocardial infarction. The model exhibited robust performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 85.1% in the training set and demonstrating strong external validity with an AUC of 85.5% in the validation cohort. A positive correlation was observed between the number of risk factors and the incidence of MACEs. Conclusions: This machine learning approach identified five predictors of MACEs in PCa patients receiving ARPIs. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment and vigilant monitoring in this patient population. Full article

Objective: Radical therapies are associated with significant morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). While advances in nuclear magnetic resonance techniques have enabled the development of focal ablation procedures that can selectively destroy tumors, preserve the gland and surrounding structures, and minimize side effects, existing vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) and nanodrug therapies often face limitations, such as recurrence and insufficient drug concentration at the tumor site. This study investigated a novel approach that combines VTP with systemic treatment using drug-loaded nanoparticles in a murine model, demonstrating substantial advancements beyond current monotherapies. Methods: SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) mice were engrafted with androgen-sensitive prostate tumor cells (LNCaP-AR) and treated with a combination of VTP and two different drugs linked to fucoidan nanoparticles (Enzalutamide and Paclitaxel). Experiments were performed using different cohorts: the evaluation of oncological effect, the administration time and concentration of systemic therapy, a comparison of efficacy between VTP and radiotherapy, and the induction of the abscopal effect in untreated synchronous tumors. Results: The groups that received combination therapy showed better tumor control. After eight weeks, the recurrence-free survival rates were 87.5%, 62.5%, and 50% in the VTP + N-PAC, VTP + N-ENZ, and VTP monotherapy groups, respectively (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the intra-tumoral concentration of nanodrugs between the groups with combined treatment and monotherapy. After two weeks, the monotherapy groups showed almost total elimination of the drugs, whereas in the combined therapy groups, this concentration remained high, starting to decrease after three weeks (p < 0.05). Treatment with nanodrugs associated with VTP showed superior oncological benefits compared to radiotherapy alone or in combination with other therapies. The abscopal effect on synchronous tumors was not demonstrated with VTP alone or in combination with nanodrugs. Conclusions: Combining vascular photodynamic therapy with nanodrugs was highly effective in treating a prostate tumor model, leading to increased survival and a reduced risk of tumor recurrence. This approach significantly advances beyond existing VTP and nanodrug therapies by improving tumor control, ensuring sustained intra-tumoral drug concentration, and yielding superior oncological outcomes. Our results suggest that this therapy is a potential treatment option for prostate tumors treated with VTP in future clinical trials. Full article

Current guidelines recommend either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. There has been emerging interest in the potential benefits of neoadjuvant ADT prior to RP for this population. Past trials indicate neoadjuvant ADT may be associated with reduced surgical complexity, pathologic downstaging, decreased positive margins, and decreased rates of nodal positivity, although they have not shown benefits for cancer progression and survival. Accordingly, neoadjuvant ADT is currently not recommended for surgical patients. Conversely, ADT is a mainstay of treatment in metastatic disease, and interest remains in expanding its use towards patients with clinically localized disease. There are several ongoing trials of second-generation androgen blockers such as enzalutamide, darolutamide, radiopharmaceuticals, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to explore long-term cancer-specific survival benefits with neoadjuvant use. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent literature and ongoing efforts to incorporate neoadjuvant therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer patients who are at high-risk of recurrence after prostatectomy. Full article

The treatment of choice for prostate cancer is androgen deprivation (ADT) and novel hormonal agents such as Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, or Apalutamide. Initially, this therapy is highly effective, but a significant challenge arises as most patients eventually develop resistance, resulting in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Furthermore, the sequential use of these drugs can lead to cross-resistance, diminishing their efficacy. Tumor heterogeneity plays a pivotal role in the development of resistance to different treatments. This study utilized cellular models of CRPC to assess the response to Apalutamide when it was administered as a second- or third-line treatment. Functional and genetic analyses were conducted in various CRPC cell models exposed to Apalutamide. These analyses included real-time cell monitoring assays, flow cytometry, clonogenicity assays, and RT-qPCR. CRPC cell models were capable of continued proliferation, maintained cell cycle profiles similar to those of untreated cells, and retained their clonogenic potential. Cross-resistance to Apalutamide in models of ADT, ADT plus Enzalutamide, or Abiraterone resistance did not correlate with the expression levels of AR-V7 and AR-V9 variants. Gene expression analysis of resistant prostate cancer cell lines revealed that treatment with Apalutamide induced the emergence of more aggressive phenotypes, including cancer stem cells or neuroendocrine differentiation profiles. Most CRPC cell models developed cross-resistance to Apalutamide and were able to proliferate and retain their clonogenic capability. Apalutamide resistance was not linked to the expression of AR-V7 or AR-V9 variants but was instead associated to bypass of AR signaling pathway and the emergence of more aggressive expression profiles. Full article

Background and Objectives: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a marker reflecting both nutritional and immune status, has been associated with prognosis in various malignancies. However, evidence in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly from non-Asian populations, remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline PNI and to develop a blood-based prognostic model in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate (AA), enzalutamide (ENZA), or cabazitaxel (CABA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included mCRPC patients treated with AA, ENZA, or CABA before or after docetaxel. PNI was calculated as: 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (/mm³). Patients were classified into low-PNI (≤40.8) and high-PNI (>40.8) groups using the median PNI value. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: A total of 299 patients were analyzed: 133 (44.5%) received AA, 106 (35.5%) ENZA, and 60 (20.0%) CABA. Patients with high PNI had significantly longer median overall survival (OS; 30.2 vs. 12.6 months, p < 0.001), radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS; 13.5 vs. 6.7 months, p < 0.001), and PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS; 10.2 vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001). These associations remained significant across all treatment subgroups. In multivariate analysis, prostate surgery (HR: 0.6), high PNI (HR: 0.5), PSA response (HR: 0.5), and elevated ALP (HR: 1.6) were independent predictors of OS. A prognostic model incorporating PNI, alkaline phosphatase, and anemia stratified patients into four risk groups with distinct OS: 49.1, 30.8, 18.8, and 9.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: This is the largest study to date in a non-Asian mCRPC population showing that baseline PNI is a strong, independent prognostic factor for survival. The proposed blood-based tool may aid in clinical risk stratification, pending prospective validation. Full article

Background/Objective: The expression of human steroid sulfatase (STS) is upregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and is associated with resistance to anti-androgen drugs, such as enzalutamide (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi). Despite the known link between STS overexpression and therapeutic unresponsiveness, the mechanism by which STS confers this phenotype remains incompletely understood. In this study, we sought to understand how STS induces treatment resistance in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) cells by exploring its role in altering mitochondrial activity. Methods: To examine the effects of increased STS expression on mitochondrial respiration and programming, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis, the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test, and a mitochondrial Complex I enzyme activity assay in STS-overexpressing cells (C4-2B STS) and in enzalutamide-resistant CPRC cells (C4-2B MDVR). We employed SI-2, the specific chemical inhibitor of STS, on C4-2B STS and C4-2B MDVR cells and evaluated STS activity inhibition on mitochondrial molecular pathways and mitochondrial respiration. Lastly, we examined the effects of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) supplementation on C4-2B STS organoids. Results: We present evidence from the transcriptomic profiling of C4-2B STS cells that there are enriched metabolic pathway signatures involved in oxidative phosphorylation, the electron transport chain, and mitochondrial organization. Moreover, upon STS inhibition, signaling in the electron transport chain and mitochondrial organization pathways is markedly attenuated. Findings from the Seahorse XF Mito Stress Test and mitochondrial Complex I enzyme activity assay demonstrate that STS overexpression increases mitochondrial respiration, whereas the inhibition of STS by SI-2 significantly reduces the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and Complex I enzyme activity in C4-2B STS cells. Similarly, an increased OCR and electron transport chain Complex I enzymatic activity are observed in C4-2B MDVR cells and a decreased OCR upon SI-2 inhibition. Lastly, we show that STS overexpression promotes organoid growth upon DHEAS treatment. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates STS as a key driver of metabolic reprogramming and flexibility in advanced prostate cancer. Disrupting enhanced mitochondrial respiration via STS presents a promising strategy in improving CRPC treatment. Full article

Introduction: Prostate cancer has been generally resistant to immunotherapy approaches. Radiation can be immunostimulatory, but the extent to which standard prostate cancer treatments induce immune activation has not been well described. The bone-targeted radiopharmaceutical Radium223 (Ra223) has been proposed to enrich immune function, but clinical studies have not fully delineated whether this is true, or by what mechanisms. Enzalutamide has been shown to increase PD-L1 expression on dendritic cells, which could impact immune activation, though the extent to which this is associated with other evidence of immune activation remains uncertain, and combination strategies remain of interest. We performed a randomized phase II trial to evaluate whether Radium223 (Ra223) added to enzalutamide would induce greater immune activation and clinical responses compared to enzalutamide alone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to Arm A (enzalutamide 160 mg PO daily + Ra223 55 kBq/kg IV q4 weeks × 6 doses) or Arm B (enzalutamide 160 mg PO daily). Blood was collected at treatment start and during treatment to measure soluble immune checkpoint biomarkers (BTLA, TIM3, HVEM, GITR, LAG3, PD-1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-L2, ICOS). Immunophenotyping by mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF) was performed to measure peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations before and after treatment. CyTOF was used to determine changes in circulating immune cell population subsets before and after treatment. Biopsies were performed of an active bone metastatic lesion prior to study treatment and after at least 3 months. IHC was subsequently performed to examine changes in immune cell population subsets before and after treatment, and changes in pSTAT3 levels. Results: In total, 30 patients were enrolled, with median age 68. The median duration of follow up was 36 months. PSA responses, PFS, and OS were not significantly different between the two arms; however, the study was not powered for clinical endpoints. Peripheral blood and bone biopsy specimens were analyzed for immune correlatives. Soluble receptor concentrations showed significantly increased expression of PDL-2 in the combination arm, but this was not seen on CyTOF. Otherwise, there were no significant differences in markers of immune activation/exhaustion or immune cell population subsets in the combination arm and enzalutamide monotherapy arm. IHC also did not show a significant difference in immune cell population subsets in bone biopsy specimens before and after treatment in both arms. However, treatment with the combination arm did show significantly increased levels of pSTAT3 (p = 0.04), which was not seen in the enzalutamide monotherapy arm. Conclusions: Our study showed an overall lack of evidence for immune activation or cytokine induction with the combination, which does not make a strong case for combinatorial immunotherapy approaches. However, the combination did induce higher levels of pSTAT3, which has been implicated in radio-resistance. Therefore, the addition of a STAT3 inhibitor to the combination may be of interest to improve efficacy. Full article

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of reduced dose compared to standard dose Enzalutamide treatment for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting the use of Enzalutamide in reduced and standard doses in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Searches were limited to articles published in the English language. Outcome assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, including 2481 patients treated with Enzalutamide. Seven studies were retrospective cohorts, two were prospective trials, and one was a prospective cohort. No consistent relationship was identified between OS and PFS and the Enzalutamide dosage. Reduced doses of Enzalutamide decreased the incidence of adverse events, particularly among elderly patients. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that reduced doses of Enzalutamide in CRPC may maintain therapeutic efficacy in selected patients while improving tolerability. However, inconsistent findings and methodological limitations highlight the need for prospective randomized trials to define optimal and individualized dosing strategies. Full article

Background/Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a prevalent and deadly disease, particularly in its advanced stages. Despite various available treatments, resistance to drugs like enzalutamide continues to present significant challenges. This study aimed to investigate the role of Galectin-1 (Gal-1) in enzalutamide-resistant PCa and assess its potential as a therapeutic target to overcome resistance. Methods: The study utilized specific siRNA-mediated knockdown of Gal-1 in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells to evaluate its effects on cell proliferation and response to enzalutamide treatment. An orthotopic mouse model was employed to examine the in vivo impact of Gal-1 knockdown. Pharmacological targeting of Gal-1 was conducted using LLS30, and its effects were assessed both in vitro and in vivo. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was performed to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed effects. Results: The findings demonstrated significant upregulation of Gal-1 in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells. Gal-1 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation and resensitized resistant cells to enzalutamide treatment in the orthotopic mouse model. Elevated levels of androgen receptor full-length and AR-V7 are key mechanisms under-lying resistance to enzalutamide in PCa. Gal-1 knockdown suppressed AR and AR-V7 expression and their transcriptional activity. Treatment with LLS30 significantly suppressed the growth of enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells and exhibited synergistic effects when combined with enzalutamide. Notably, this combination therapy significantly inhibited the growth of enzalutamide-resistant xenografts in vivo. RNA-seq analysis revealed that LLS30 modulates AR and AR-V7 signaling through the inhibition of associated target genes. Conclusion: These findings highlight Gal-1 as a promising therapeutic target for overcoming enzalutamide resistance in PCa. Targeting the Gal-1/AR/AR-V7 axis with LLS30 presents a novel strategy to enhance enzalutamide efficacy and address drug resistance in advanced PCa. Full article

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. The increase in incidence rates of more advanced and aggressive forms of the disease year-to-year fuels urgency to find new therapeutic interventions and bolster already established ones. PCa is a uniquely targetable disease in that it is fueled by male hormones (androgens) that drive tumorigenesis via the androgen receptor or AR. Current standard-of-care therapies directly target AR and its aberrant signaling axis but resistance to these therapies commonly arises, and the mechanisms behind the onset of therapy-resistance are still elusive. Research has shown that even with resistant disease, AR remains the main driver of growth and survival of PCa, and AR target genes and cofactors may help mediate resistance to therapy. Here, we focused on a homeobox transcription factor that exhibits a close relationship with AR—NKX3.1. Though NKX3.1 is traditionally thought of as a tumor suppressor, it has been previously reported to promote cancer cell survival by cooperating with AR. The role of NKX3.1 as a tumor suppressor perhaps in early-stage disease also contradicts its profile as a diagnostic biomarker for advanced prostate cancer. Methods: We investigated the physical interaction between NKX3.1 and AR, a modulated NKX3.1 expression in prostate cancer cells via overexpression and knockdown and assayed subsequent viability and downstream target gene expression. Results: We find that the expression of NKX3.1 is maintained in advanced PCa, and it is often elevated because of aberrant AR activity. Transient knockdown experiments across various PCa cell line models reveal NKX3.1 expression is necessary for survival. Similarly, stable overexpression of NKX3.1 in PCa cell lines reveals an androgen insensitive phenotype, suggesting NKX3.1 is sufficient to promote growth in the absence of an AR ligand. Conclusions: Our work provides new insight into NKX3.1’s oncogenic influence on PCa and the molecular interplay of these transcription factors in models of late-stage prostate cancer. Full article

Prostate cancer remains a significant global health concern, prompting ongoing exploration of novel therapeutic agents. Licochalcone A, a natural product in the chalcone family isolated from licorice root, is characterized by its enone structure and demonstrates antiproliferative activity in the micromolar range across various cell lines, including prostate cancer. Building on our prior success in enhancing curcumin’s antiproliferative potency by replacing the substituted phenol with a 1-alkyl-1H-imizadol-2-yl moiety, we applied a similar approach to design a new class of licochalcone A-inspired chalcones. The synthesis of these target chalcones involved key [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of aryl prenyl ethers and Claisen–Schmidt condensations, yielding three derivative series. These compounds were evaluated for antiproliferative activity in both androgen receptor (AR)-positive and AR-null prostate cancer cell models using WST-1 cell proliferation assay. Systematic evaluation of licochalcone A across four prostate cancer cell lines indicated a modest advantage over enzalutamide, an FDA-approved AR antagonist, in suppressing 22Rv1 cell proliferation. Interestingly, three ester derivatives by replacing the phenol next to the carbonyl with an alkoxide demonstrated similar antiproliferative potency to licochalcone A in both AR-positive and AR-negative prostate cancer cell lines. This suggests that the phenol moiety on licochalcone A may be a promising site for chemical manipulations to enhance anti-prostate cancer activity. Among the synthesized chalcones, nine derivatives showed improved selectivity for AR-positive LNCaP and 22RV1 cells relative to AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 cells, surpassing licochalcone A in selectivity. Additionally, the antiproliferative potency was highly dependent on the R group attached to the imidazole. Most of the derivatives showed antiproliferative potency against androgen receptor-positive LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells, comparable to that of enzalutamide and licochalcone A. These findings suggest that optimization of licochalcone A-inspired chalcones as potential anti-prostate cancer agents warrants further investigation. Full article

Background/Objectives: Several drugs used to treat prostate cancer have been reported to cause cardiovascular adverse events, and this study sought to identify the real-world risk. Methods: This study utilized real-world data from the FAERS to analyze the association between prostate cancer treatment and cardiovascular adverse events. It evaluated men treated with LHRH agonists and antagonists, antiandrogens, androgen synthesis inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors from 2003 to 2023. This study included patients treated with leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, relugolix, bicalutamide, flutamide, apalutamide, nilutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, olaparib, rucaparib, talazoparib, and niraparib. The main outcome measure was the reported odds ratio (ROR) of adverse cardiovascular event associated with these treatments. Results: Among the 4,049,329 unique adverse event reports, 4391 cardiovascular events were identified. Leuprolide (ROR 0.481, 95% CI: 0.423–0.547), triptorelin (ROR 0.527, 95% CI: 0.305–0.909), enzalutamide (ROR 0.393, 95% CI: 0.341–0.452), and olaparib (ROR 0.145, 95% CI: 0.054–0.386) reduced the risk of myocardial infarction. Goserelin increased the risk of myocardial infarction (ROR 2.235, 95% CI: 1.367–3.654). Degarelix and relugolix both increased the risk of heart failure (ROR 3.136, 95% CI: 2.186–4.497), and enzalutamide was associated with an increased risk of heart failure (ROR 1.305, 95% CI: 1.135–1.501). Bicalutamide increased the risk of unstable angina (ROR 3.019, 95% CI: 1.621–5.622) and heart failure (ROR 3.730, 95% CI: 3.085–4.510). Niraparib increased the risk of hypertension (ROR 4.154, 95% CI: 1.709–10.092). Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for clinicians to monitor cardiac complications in patients undergoing these therapies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Androgen receptor (AR) expression and signaling are critical for the progression of prostate cancer and have been the therapeutic focus of prostate cancer for over 50 years. While a variety of agents have been developed to target this axis, many of these fail due to the emergent expression of AR RNA splice variants, such as AR-V7, that can signal independently of ligand binding. Other therapies, such as vaccination against prostate-specific antigens, have achieved FDA approvals but have fallen short of being incorporated as standard-of-care therapies for advanced prostate cancer. This may be due to the elevated level of immunosuppression observed in prostate cancer, which remains largely refractory to immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We developed a vaccine targeting AR-V7, a common isoform associated with treatment resistance, and demonstrated its ability to elicit AR-V7-specific immunity and enable anti-tumor responses against AR-V7+ cancers in subcutaneous tumor models. Results: Our studies also revealed that AR-V7 expression conferred an immune suppressive phenotype that was significant in a non-AR-dependent prostate cancer model. Notably, in this model, we found that vaccination in combination with enzalutamide, an AR antagonist, suppressed these aggressive immune suppressive cancers and resulted in enhanced survival in comparison to control vaccinated and enzalutamide-treated mice. While anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) alone slowed tumor growth, the majority of vaccinated mice that received anti-PD-1 therapy showed complete tumor elimination. Conclusions: Collectively, these results validate the importance of AR signaling in prostate cancer immune suppression and suggest the potential of AR-V7-specific vaccines as therapeutic strategies against prostate cancer, offering significant protective and therapeutic anti-tumor responses, even in the presence of androgen signaling inhibitors. Full article

Recent advances have broadened the range of therapeutic options for mCRPC, with several new treatments, including novel hormonal therapies (enzalutamide, abiraterone), chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), immunotherapies (sipuleucel-T), and bone targeting radiopharmaceuticals (radium-223) showing improved clinical outcomes and receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. These new treatments provide new avenues for improving patient survival and quality of life. Radium-223, a targeted alpha-emitter, specifically targets bone metastases, offering palliative benefits and a potential increase in life expectancy. The integration of radium-223 with other treatments shows promise for managing mCRPC. However, the optimal sequencing and combination of radium-223 with other therapies are still being explored, with various clinical trials investigating new therapeutic approaches. The integration of these therapies, especially to provide more effective, personalized treatment strategies, requires further investigation. A thorough literature review was conducted on current treatments for mCRPC, including chemotherapeutic agents, oral hormonal therapies targeting the androgen receptor axis, immunotherapies, and radium-223. Ongoing clinical trials investigating radium-233 in the context of other therapies for the treatment of mCRPC patients were also reviewed. Further studies should focus on determining the optimal sequencing and dosing and identifying biomarkers that predict treatment response to enhance outcomes of mCRPC patients. This review underlines the rational strategies of combining radium-223 with other therapies, investigating their impact on bone in terms of delaying skeletal-related events, and managing bone disease progression in mCRPC patients. Full article