Search Results (56)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have transitioned from clinically marginal agents into a defining therapeutic class for solid tumor oncology. In DESTINY-Breast03, trastuzumab deruxtecan achieved a four-fold progression-free survival advantage over trastuzumab emtansine, attributable not to antibody engineering but to the linker-payload axis: a cleavable peptide linker and a topoisomerase I payload with bystander activity. Sacituzumab govitecan extends the same logic to Trop-2-positive disease via extracellular payload release, and the framework now spans breast, urothelial, gynecologic, lung, gastric, and colorectal cancers, with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab displacing platinum chemotherapy as first-line therapy for urothelial cancer in EV-302 (median overall survival 31.5 versus 16.1 months). This review synthesizes ADC biology along three analytical axes. The mechanistic axis links each linker-payload-DAR configuration to a specific tumor-biology barrier: vascular limitation, which delivers approximately 0.1% of the administered dose to tumor tissue; the binding-site barrier, which concentrates exposure at the perivascular margin; and antigen mosaicism, which defeats internalization-dependent killing. The translational axis examines resistance as a coordinated failure across antigen modulation, trafficking, efflux, apoptotic execution, and lysosomal processing. The clinical axis traces the platform’s migration toward earlier-line and curative-intent settings. We close by examining whether the ADC delivery architecture translates to precision immunosuppression in autoimmune disease, where the glucocorticoid receptor modulator ADC ABBV-154 met placebo-controlled efficacy endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis but was discontinued because its benefit-risk profile did not differentiate it from existing biologic therapies. Full article

The management of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is undergoing a paradigm shift from static anatomical staging to molecularly guided dynamic approaches that integrate time as a critical therapeutic variable. This evolution is driven by liquid biopsies, particularly circulating tumor DNA, which allow real-time tumor interrogation. We conducted this expert review to synthesize landmark evidence, enabling technologies, and implementation challenges in dynamic precision oncology for UC. In this non-systematic narrative review, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for articles published between January 2015 and February 2026. Studies were selected based on their relevance to dynamic precision oncology, clinical actionability, and translational implementation, prioritizing landmark randomized controlled trials providing level 1–2 evidence, large prospective cohorts, and key translational studies. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab established the new first-line standard for metastatic UC, achieving a median overall survival of 33.8 months versus 15.9 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.61). Circulating tumor DNA demonstrates robust prognostic value for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection (Level 2a evidence), stratifying recurrence risk with hazard ratios of approximately 4.5. Critically, the IMvigor011 trial has now provided Level 1b evidence that ctDNA-guided adjuvant atezolizumab improves both disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.64, p = 0.0047) and OS (HR 0.59, p = 0.0131) in ctDNA(+) patients, while validating treatment de-escalation in ctDNA(−) patients (1-year DFS 95%). Erdafitinib in patients harboring FGFR2/3 alterations (HR 0.64) confirms the value of genomic profiling. Major limitations include the inherent selection bias of this non-systematic approach, substantial platform heterogeneity, and lack of standardization. In conclusion, dynamic precision oncology has transformed UC management, with the IMvigor011 trial establishing ctDNA-guided MRD status as the first phase 3-validated predictive biomarker framework for adjuvant therapy selection in a solid tumor. Implementation requires adherence to established standardization frameworks, cross-platform and cross-agent validations, and tiered implementation strategies to ensure equitable access across diverse resource settings. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Bladder cancer is common, with urothelial carcinoma (UC) comprising most cases in Western countries. Metastases usually involve pelvic structures, lymph nodes, and organs such as the liver, lungs, bones, and adrenal glands. Identifying unusual metastatic sites is critical for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old man with a history of high-grade (G3) UC and carcinoma in situ, previously treated with TURBT, second-look resection, and SWOG-protocol BCG, presented with a new bladder lesion (pT1). Staging CT revealed extravesical spread and a 1.5 cm pancreatic body nodule. EUS-guided biopsy confirmed metastatic UC with concordant immunohistochemistry (GATA3+), excluding primary pancreatic cancer. The patient was referred for systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and Enfortumab Vedotin. Conclusions: This case demonstrates the rare occurrence of pancreatic metastasis from bladder UC. EUS-guided biopsy with immunohistochemistry is essential to distinguish secondary lesions from primary pancreatic tumors. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to guide systemic therapy, particularly with emerging immunotherapy and antibody–drug conjugates. Full article

Background: This study describes treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the US following the approval of avelumab for first-line maintenance treatment. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified patient data from the Tempus database. Eligible patients had completed first-line systemic anticancer treatment for aUC between July 2020 and March 2023. Results: In total, 974 eligible patients were identified; most (72%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 70 years. Among patients who completed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (644 [66%]), 574 (89%) had no evidence of disease progression. Of 219 patients who received first-line maintenance, 135 (62%) received avelumab. Median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from avelumab maintenance start were 14.9 months (13.1—not estimable [NE) and 6.4 months (4.6—NE), respectively. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was the most common second-line treatment after avelumab (70%). Median (95% CI) OS and PFS from second-line EV start were 11.6 months (6.1—NE) and 6.6 months (4.1—NE), respectively. Conclusions: Results provide insights into the impact of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with aUC in the US. Effectiveness data are consistent with previous findings, supporting the use of avelumab maintenance in patients without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Second-line EV after progression on avelumab maintenance had similar effectiveness to results from other real-world studies. Full article

Background: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has become a first-line standard for metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma. However, EVP is associated with distinct toxicities, particularly cutaneous adverse events, and prophylactic systemic corticosteroids were not permitted in pivotal trials. Therefore, the safety and early effectiveness of EVP with routine dexamethasone premedication in real-world practice remain unclear. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma who received first-line EVP at five institutions in Japan between September 2024 and September 2025. All patients received routine intravenous dexamethasone premedication before enfortumab vedotin administration. Safety and early clinical outcomes were evaluated, with exploratory subgroup analyses according to clinical trial eligibility and EVITA criteria. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included, with a median age of 75 years, and more than half would have been ineligible for pivotal clinical trials. Cutaneous toxicity was the most frequent adverse event (52.0%), whereas grade ≥3 skin reactions were uncommon (3.9%). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, the objective response rate was 73.0%. The 6-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 73.9% and 78.7%, respectively. Early progression-free survival was generally maintained across subgroups stratified by clinical trial eligibility and EVITA category, with no evidence of excess early progression. Conclusions: In this real-world multicenter cohort, first-line EVP with routine dexamethasone premedication was feasible, with manageable toxicity and encouraging early clinical activity, including in patients with comorbidities commonly encountered in routine clinical practice. Longer follow-up and prospective comparative studies are warranted to clarify long-term outcomes and the impact of dexamethasone on efficacy and toxicity. Full article

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have reshaped the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) by enabling selective delivery of highly potent cytotoxic agents to tumor cells. Enfortumab vedotin, sacituzumab govitecan, and HER2-directed ADCs have demonstrated meaningful clinical activity across metastatic and earlier disease settings, with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab now established as a first-line standard of care. Despite these advances, therapeutic responses remain heterogeneous, and resistance frequently limits durability. This review summarizes current knowledge on predictors of response and mechanisms of resistance to ADCs in UC, highlighting the roles of target antigen expression and heterogeneity, genomic alterations, payload sensitivity, drug efflux transporters, and tumor microenvironmental factors. We discuss emerging biomarkers beyond antigen abundance, patterns of cross-resistance and treatment sequencing, and evolving strategies to overcome resistance, including next-generation ADC design and rational combination therapies. Advancing biomarker-driven patient selection and addressing mechanisms of resistance will be critical to maximizing the durability and clinical impact of ADCs in urothelial carcinoma. Full article

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a lethal cancer with limited therapeutic options. Advances in genomic and transcriptomic research have deepened the understanding of mUC biology, leading to the identification of clinically relevant molecular alterations that represent potential actionable targets. This has broadened the treatment landscape of the disease to include novel agents, such as antibody–drug conjugates (e.g., enfortumab vedotin) and targeted therapies, including the pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor erdafitinib. Genomic alterations in FGFR3 are well-established oncogenic drivers in bladder cancer and represent predictive biomarkers of response to FGFR-targeted therapies. The phase III THOR trial demonstrated the clinical benefit of erdafitinib in previously treated mUC patients harboring FGFR3 alterations and supported its subsequent approval by the European Medicines Agency. In this context, accurate molecular profiling is essential to guide patient selection for FGFR inhibitor therapy. Equally important is the standardization and timely implementation of FGFR3 testing in clinical practice to optimize treatment planning. This review addresses key considerations in FGFR3 testing in mUC and discusses how it can be routinely incorporated into clinical practice. Full article

Avelumab maintenance therapy is approved in Japan for patients with aUC without progression after PBC. This report presents subgroup analysis data from the JAVEMACS chart review of avelumab maintenance in patients who received 1L ddMVAC and GC. This retrospective study reviewed medical charts of patients with aUC (February 2021–December 2023). Overall, 350 patients (ddMVAC, n = 32 and GC, n = 196) were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two PBC groups. Median duration from PBC start to avelumab start was 13.2 and 21.1 weeks; median overall survival (OS) was not reached (both groups), progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 and 7.4 months, and PFS2 was 27.6 and 21.3 months for the ddMVAC and GC groups, respectively. At data cutoff (June 2024), 25.0% of patients in the ddMVAC and 17.3% in the GC groups were ongoing avelumab treatment. Second-line treatments included EV (64.3% ddMVAC; 64.5% GC), pembrolizumab (21.4% ddMVAC; 8.3% GC), and PBC (14.3% ddMVAC and 21.5% GC). This real-world data from patients with aUC in Japan showed consistent OS patterns with avelumab maintenance across treatment subgroups vs. the overall population despite their inherent heterogeneity. Although patients were not resistant to PBC, 2L EV was more common than 2L PBC. Full article

Background/Objectives: The therapeutic landscape of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) has shifted from platinum chemotherapy to precision immuno-oncology. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)—pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and avelumab—show efficacy across platinum-refractory, maintenance, and adjuvant settings, yet benefit is limited to subsets, underscoring the need for biomarkers. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), notably enfortumab vedotin(EV), and targeted agents such as FGFR inhibitors further expand options. This review synthesizes current evidence and emerging paradigms to guide combinations and sequencing. Methods: We performed a narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed trials (emphasizing pivotal phase III studies), key translational investigations, and contemporary guidelines on ICIs, ADCs, HER2-directed therapies, FGFR inhibitors, molecular subtyping, and genomic profiling in UC, integrating efficacy signals, biomarker associations, and practical implications for sequencing. Results: ICIs now occupy multiple settings, but heterogeneous benefit highlights the importance of molecularly informed selection. EV alone and with pembrolizumab has produced unprecedented first-line activity, prompting a strategic shift. Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling delineate phenotypes with variable immune responsiveness and targetable vulnerabilities, enabling rational combinations and refined sequencing. Ongoing trials are evaluating next-generation ADCs, HER2-directed approaches, and dual checkpoint blockade to achieve durable, personalized disease control. Conclusions: Management of locally advanced or metastatic UC is converging on precision immuno-oncology, wherein biomarker-driven selection, molecular subtyping, and thoughtful sequencing of ICIs, ADCs, and targeted agents are central to optimizing outcomes. Active trials and translational advances are expected to refine personalized strategies and embed molecular guidance into routine care. Full article

Urothelial carcinoma in situ (UCIS) is a high-grade non-muscle-invasive neoplasm with significant clinical implications due to its potential for progression to muscle-invasive disease. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification are crucial for appropriate management, particularly given the variability in response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. While the diagnosis of UCIS primarily relies on morphological criteria, immunohistochemical (IHC) markers serve as valuable ancillary tools, particularly in challenging cases. Markers such as CK20, CD44, p53, and Ki-67 have been extensively studied, though none demonstrate complete sensitivity or specificity. Additionally, molecular classification has identified luminal and basal subtypes, with potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Recent studies have also explored predictive biomarkers for BCG response, including PD-L1, whose expression correlates with recurrence and potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging targeted therapies, such as enfortumab vedotin, have shown promise, with nectin-4 overexpression observed in most UCIS cases. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including interobserver variability in morphological assessment, heterogeneous IHC methodologies, and the need for standardized molecular testing. This review highlights the current understanding of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive tissue biomarkers in UCIS, underscoring the potential role of molecular profiling in guiding personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on refining biomarker-driven classification systems to improve risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in UCIS patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable prognosis compared to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Current treatment strategies for UTUC are largely derived from bladder cancer studies, underscoring the need for UTUC-directed research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UTUC, encompassing diagnostic approaches, systemic and intraluminal therapies, surgical management, and future directions. Methods: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing evidence from guideline-based recommendations, retrospective and prospective clinical studies, and ongoing trials focused on UTUC. Results: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is increasingly preferred in UTUC due to the risk of postoperative renal impairment that may preclude adjuvant cisplatin use. Surgical management includes kidney-sparing approaches and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with selection guided by tumor risk and patient comorbidities. While endoscopic management (EM) preserves renal function, it carries a higher recurrence and surveillance burden; RNU remains standard for high-risk cases. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic UTUC mirrors that of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy over chemotherapy in the EV-302 trial, with improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across subgroups, including UTUC. For patients ineligible for EV, the CheckMate-901 study supported first-line chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nivolumab. Further systemic therapy strategies include maintenance avelumab post-chemotherapy (JAVELIN Bladder 100), targeted therapies such as erdafitinib (THOR trial), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-PanTumor02) in FGFR2/3-altered and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Conclusions: Historically, the therapeutic landscape of UTUC has been extrapolated from bladder cancer; however, ongoing research specific to UTUC is deriving more precise regimens involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and biomarker-driven therapies. Full article

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the association of diabetes mellitus and its medications with overall response (ORR) and mortality or cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving enfortumab vedotin monotherapy. Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study was designed according to the guidelines for the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ). Eligible patients were adults (≥18) years treated with enfortumab vedotin monotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer between June 2024 and January 2025. A total of 125 patients were reported across 11 centres. Results: The cohort included 93 males (74.4%) and 32 females (25.6%), with a mean age of 68.3 years (SD 9.3). The primary tumour site was the bladder in 109 (87.2%) cases and the upper tract (UTUC) in 16 (12.8%) cases. Interestingly, medication with metformin was significantly associated with cancer-specific mortality (37.9% versus 77.8%; p = 0.019), while patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus had a significantly better CSS (Log Rank = 0.004). Upon comparing only patients who already had diabetes mellitus and then received anti-diabetic medication, there was a significant association between patients with diabetes mellitus receiving metformin and a worse 3-month ORR (80.0% versus 55.6%; p = 0.039). Regarding the subpopulation of UTUC, cancer-specific mortality was significantly associated with metformin medication (p = 0.033). Conclusions: Despite recent reports that metformin has protective effects in urothelial cancer, our findings suggest that metformin use may be linked to worse responses and survival outcomes in patients treated with enfortumab vedotin monotherapy. Further research, particularly translational research into the underlying diabetic and pharmacologic pathways, is warranted. Full article

Background/Objectives: To summarize the relevant trials relating to novel strategies and therapeutic advances in the treatment of bladder cancer. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature and recent/ongoing clinical trials was conducted, focusing on novel treatments and strategies for bladder cancer. Trials started or published as of 2020 were included. Results: The standard of care for MIBC remains neoadjuvant chemotherapy with perioperative immunotherapy in the cisplatin-eligible population, while guidelines do not exist for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Strategies under investigation include combinations of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, and/or novel therapies, such as ADCs, targeted agents, intravesical treatments, and personalized vaccines. Bladder-sparing approaches using these novel therapies are also being studied. In the advanced/metastatic setting, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has supplanted platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment option. For those with contraindications, or who progress, strategies under investigation include newer immunotherapies and ADCs, novel small molecule inhibitors, and cellular therapies. Conclusions: The treatment landscape for bladder cancer has changed drastically within the last few years. Ongoing trials hope to build on this success by investigating bladder-sparing strategies for MIBC and novel systemic therapies in advanced patients. Full article

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel approach to cancer treatment. Enfortumab vedotin (PADCEV), as a prominent example, has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy. However, its ocular toxicity has raised concerns. This study aimed to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying PADCEV—induced ocular toxicity. SD rats, whose ocular structures are similar to those of humans, were selected to establish an ocular toxicity model to mimic the human response. In vitro experiments were conducted using human primary corneal epithelial cells, HCE-T. The results confirmed that nectin-4 plays a crucial role in the cellular uptake of PADCEV, and non-specific pinocytosis is also involved. Additionally, a variant was obtained by introducing point mutations in the Fc region of PADCEV, which was found to reduce corneal epithelial toxicity. The findings of this study not only deepen our understanding of ADC-induced ocular toxicity but also provide new insights into optimizing ADC design and enhancing treatment safety. Full article

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) in combination with pembrolizumab (P) has led to a new paradigm for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Since the presentation of the results of the EV-302 trial at the European Society of Medical Oncology 2023 annual meeting, the entire treatment landscape for mUC has been upended. At the 2024 Albert Symposium, we reviewed ongoing research investigating predictive biomarkers for EV response and resistance as well as clinical trials exploring the potential role for EV in different clinical disease states including non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive disease. Full article