Search Results (146)

Background: This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of rehabilitation-focused exercise interventions for lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD), a leading cause of chronic low back pain. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across international and regional databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Magiran, SID, and Noormags) covering the period from January 2010 to January 2025. The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD420251088811. Using keywords such as “lumbar DDD,” “exercise therapy,” and “rehabilitation,” a total of 2495 records were identified. After screening, 20 studies—including clinical trials, quasi-experimental, and experimental designs—met the inclusion criteria and were assessed using the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies. Results: Interventions such as hydrotherapy, core stability training, Pilates, and suspension exercises were found to significantly reduce pain and improve functional outcomes. While multimodal approaches (e.g., aquatic exercise combined with acupuncture) showed positive effects, the comparative studies revealed no significant differences between modalities. Suspension training demonstrated superior efficacy in pain reduction compared to isolated core stability exercises. The methodological quality of included studies ranged from good to excellent, with the majority rated as very good or excellent (McMaster scores: 8 “excellent,” 7 “very good,” and 5 “good”). Common limitations among the studies included methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes (n = 14–30), and insufficient long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Exercise-based rehabilitation is an effective strategy for managing lumbar DDD. Evidence particularly supports the use of suspension training and aquatic therapy for superior improvements in pain and functional outcomes. Future research should aim to adopt standardized protocols, recruit larger sample sizes, and include extended follow-up periods to produce more robust and generalizable findings. Full article

Background: Multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease (ms-LDD) is a common condition in older adults, often requiring surgical intervention. While rigid stabilization remains the gold standard, it is associated with complications such as adjacent segment disease (ASD), higher blood loss, and longer recovery times. The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system offers an alternative by preserving motion while stabilizing the spine. However, data comparing Dynesys with fusion in multisegmental cases are limited. Objective: This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus rigid stabilization in the treatment of ms-LDD. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 53 patients (mean age: 62.25 ± 15.37 years) who underwent either Dynesys dynamic stabilization (n = 27) or PLIF (n = 26) for ms-LDD involving at least seven motion segments. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), while radiological parameters such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and, sacral slope) were analyzed. A two-stage surgical approach was employed in the Dynesys group to enhance osseointegration, particularly in elderly osteoporotic patients. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between them. However, the Dynesys group demonstrated superior sagittal alignment correction, with a significant increase in LL (p < 0.002) and a significant decrease in SVA (p < 0.0015), whereas changes in the rigid stabilization group were not statistically significant. Additionally, the Dynesys group had fewer complications, including a lower incidence of ASD (0 vs. 6 cases). The two-stage technique facilitated improved screw osseointegration and reduced surgical risks in osteoporotic patients. Conclusions: Dynesys dynamic stabilization is an effective alternative to rigid stabilization in ms-LDD, offering comparable pain relief and functional improvement while preserving motion and reducing ASD risk. The two-stage approach enhances long-term stability, making it particularly suitable for elderly or osteoporotic patients. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic rod stabilization with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar instability. Specifically, we evaluated the prognostic value of hybrid systems in reducing adjacent segment disease (ASD), enhancing fusion rates, and improving functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients treated between 2019 and 2022. Group 1 (n = 34) underwent dynamic rod stabilization alone, while Group 2 (n = 28) received dynamic stabilization combined with TLIF. Radiological assessments included disk height index (DHI) and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi^® software (version 2.4.1). Results: The hybrid group (dynamic + TLIF) demonstrated significantly higher anterior fusion rates (p < 0.001) and greater improvement in VAS scores for back (p = 0.005) and leg pain (p < 0.001) at 12 months. Although operative time was longer (p = 0.002), there was no significant difference in hospital stay (p = 0.635). No significant differences were observed in ASD development (p = 0.11) or pseudoarthrosis (p = 0.396). The hybrid group maintained better lumbar lordosis and higher adjacent segment DHI. Conclusions: Hybrid dynamic stabilization combined with TLIF provides superior clinical outcomes and fusion rates compared to dynamic stabilization alone, without significantly increasing the risk of ASD. These findings support the use of hybrid constructs as a balanced strategy for treating degenerative lumbar instability. Full article

Background: Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) is a surgical procedure aimed at addressing a range of pathological conditions affecting the structure and function of the spine. Patient-Specific Interbody Cages (PSICs) are an emerging technology that are used in LIF; however, there is a lack of clinical outcome data, making it difficult to assess the potential risks, benefits, and value of PSICs. The purpose of this present study is to contribute data to the field on this new emerging technology. The aims were to investigate Quality of Life (QoL), pain, and the complications of PSICs in LIF. To provide a comparative cohort, we performed a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes of conventional fusion techniques. Methods: This study reports on a multi-surgeon, multi-centre clinical trial of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease, necessitating discectomy and fusion. All patients underwent LIF procedures with 3D-printed PSICs. Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and QoL (EQ-5D) scores were collected pre-operatively and at 6m, 12m, and 24m post-operatively. For comparative purposes, we performed a systematic review of the VAS scores from traditional LIF cages and analysed the Australian Spine Registry QoL data. Results: The literature search yielded 4272 publications. The studies were subdivided into four groups based on the interbody device type. All the groups demonstrated improvements in the VAS (for back pain) scores post-operatively. In total, 78 patients (109 instrumented levels) underwent LIF procedures with 3DP PSICs. There were three reoperations (3.8%) and no revisions of any PSIC. The mean VAS scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) from 7.85 (1.50 SD) pre-operatively to 2.03 (2.13 SD) at 24 months post-operatively. The mean QoL index scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) from a pre-operative 0.257 (0.332 SD) to 0.815 (0.208 SD) at 24 months. Conclusions: The systematic review indicated that device fixation to the interbody space was associated with lower VAS scores. The results from the investigational cohort suggest that PSICs may represent a new progression in implant design for spinal fusion, with an associated clinical benefit for LIF. Full article

Background: Structured titanium (ST) cages are designed to enhance osseointegration and fusion in lumbar interbody procedures. However, clinical and radiological outcomes following TLIF using ST cages—particularly with or without adjacent-level dynamic stabilization (DSS)—have not been widely reported. Objective: To evaluate 12-month fusion outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after TLIF with structured titanium cages, comparing cases with and without adjacent-level DSS. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 patients undergoing TLIF with ST cages were analyzed—41 with hybrid instrumentation (TLIF + DSS) and 41 with TLIF alone. PROMs (ODI, VAS for back and leg pain, EQ-5D-5L) were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months. Fusion was assessed via CT scans at 12 months. Results: PROMs significantly improved over time in both groups (p < 0.001 for ODI, VAS back, VAS leg), but there were no significant differences between the hybrid and non-hybrid groups. Overall, the interbody fusion rate was 84%. Complete fusion was observed in 84% of the hybrid group and 80% of the TLIF-only group (p = 0.716), with very low rates of non-union. Conclusions: Structured titanium cages demonstrated excellent 1-year fusion rates and supported significant clinical improvement after TLIF. The addition of dynamic stabilization had no measurable effect on patient-reported or radiological outcomes at 12 months. Long-term studies are needed to assess any potential effect of DSS on adjacent segment disease. Full article

Background/Objectives: There exists a need to capture the current landscape of the literature for lumbar decompression on muscle strength, as measured by manual muscle testing (MMT), in cohorts with foot drop secondary to lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from each database’s inception to 21 March 2025. Eligible studies reported patients with LDD-related foot drop treated surgically. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024550980). Results: A total of 20 studies comprising 918 patients met the eligibility criteria, with most cases attributable to lumbar disc herniation (79% of patients, 95% CI: 0.72–0.85, I² = 96%) or spinal stenosis (22% of patients, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I² = 96%). Following surgery, 60% of patients (95% CI: 0.44–0.75, I² = 97%) achieved an MMT score of 4–5, indicating recovery, while 82% (95% CI: 0.76–0.88, I² = 89%) demonstrated an improvement of at least one MMT grade. No improvement was seen in 18% of patients (95% CI: 0.12–0.24, I² = 89%). For pain, the preoperative VAS mean was 5.91 (95% CI: 4.21–7.60, I² = 99%), while the postoperative mean was 1.00 (95% CI: −0.05–2.06, I² = 99%). Overall complications were reported at 1% (95% CI: −0.00–0.02, I² = 0%). Conclusions: Lumbar decompression achieves clinically meaningful recovery of LDD-induced foot drop. However, this meta-analysis highlights the overlooked portion of patients who will not respond, providing a sequential approach for future investigation of these cohorts through foundational evidence of the present literature base. Full article

The traditional bilateral pedicle screw system has been used for the treatment of various lumbar spine conditions including advanced degenerative disc disease. However, there is an ongoing need to develop more effective and less invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS) with the novel reverse transdiscal screw system (RTSS) for lumbar disc degenerative disease. A 3D solid lumbar L1–L5 spine model was developed and validated based on a human CT scan. Fusions were simulated at L3–L4. The first scenario comprised a transforaminal lumbar interbody cage in combination with the bilateral pedicle screw-rod system (BPSS-TLIF). In the second scenario, the same TLIF cage was combined with reverse L3–L4 transdiscal screws (RTSS-TLIF). Testing parameters included range of motion (ROM) in three orthogonal axes, hardware (cage and screw) stress, and shear load resistance. The ROM of the surgical model was reduced by approximately 90% compared to the intact model at the fused level. The RTSS model demonstrated less ROM compared to the BPSS model at the fused level for all loading conditions. Overall, the RTSS model exhibited lower stress on both screws and cage compared with the BPSS model in all biomechanical testing conditions. The RTSS model also exhibited higher anterior and posterior shear load resistance than the BPSS model. In conclusion, the RTSS model proved superior to the BPSS model in all respects. These findings indicate that the RTSS could serve as a feasible option for patients undergoing lumbar fusion, especially for adjacent segment disease, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes for disc degeneration. Full article

Background/Objectives: Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains a debated approach in spinal surgery, with limited published evidence supporting its efficacy without supplemental fixation. This prospective study presents the institutional case series on single-level L3-L4 stand-alone LLIF, using next-generation 3D-printed titanium cages, as treatment for degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods: A cohort of 49 patients with symptomatic DDD, unresponsive to conservative therapy, underwent stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 (neither posterior pedicle screws nor lateral plating). Clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) and radiological parameters (disc height, segmental/lumbar lordosis) were collected preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was adopted for statistical analysis. Results: Significant improvements were observed in pain and disability scores at all time points, with the mean VAS score decreasing from 6.53 to 0.29, and ODI from 27.6% to 3.84% at one year (p < 0.001). Radiographic analysis confirmed durable increases in disc height and segmental lordosis. Solid fusion was achieved in 97.9% of cases. No patient required posterior revision; transient neurological symptoms were mild and self-limiting. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 is safe and effective in achieving stable fusion and clinical–radiological improvement. These results challenge the necessity of supplemental fixation and support the broader adoption of a less invasive fusion paradigm. Full article

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly employed surgical technique for managing lumbar degenerative disease and spinal instability. While it offers advantages over posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), traditional TLIF often involves prolonged recovery and morbidity due to muscle retraction. To improve outcomes, several alternative techniques have emerged, including minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), trans-Kambin percutaneous TLIF (PE-TLIF), and transfacet TLIF (TF-TLIF). Each approach presents distinct anatomical and technical advantages, yet no standardized framework exists to guide their selection based on individual patient anatomy. In this study, we review the evolution of TLIF techniques and propose a novel algorithm that integrates patient-specific imaging, anatomical variability, and segmentation data to guide surgical decision-making. By analyzing the surgical corridors, indications, and limitations of each approach, and presenting representative clinical cases, we demonstrate how this algorithm can be applied in practice. For instance, TF-TLIF may be optimal in patients requiring direct decompression without major deformity, while PE-TLIF may be appropriate for those with Kambin’s triangles measuring ≥ 9 mm, allowing for indirect decompression. This tailored framework aims to optimize outcomes and reduce complications. Further prospective validation and incorporation of AI-driven segmentation tools are needed to support broader clinical implementation. Full article

Background/Objectives: Degenerative lumbar spine disease (DLSD) is increasingly managed with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and evolving anesthesia methods. While general anesthesia (GA) remains standard, spinal anesthesia (SA) may offer faster recovery and fewer side effects. This study compares the clinical and economic outcomes of GA versus SA in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: A retrospective review of 18 TLIF patients (2018–2022) was performed, with 9 patients in each cohort. Patients were matched by demographics and procedure type. Data collected included operative time, blood loss, complications, postoperative opioid utilization, and 30-day readmissions. Costs were analyzed in categories: anesthesia, implants, inpatient care, operating room (OR) supplies, OR time, and PACU fees, using Wilcoxon Rank T-tests and Pearson Chi-Squared tests. Results: Clinical outcomes such as blood loss, and operative time were similar between groups. However, SA patients had significantly shorter LOS compared to GA (SA: 12 h vs. GA: 84 h, % difference: −150%, p = 0.04). Additionally, SA patients had lower total direct costs ($27,881.85 vs. $35,669.01; p = 0.027). Significant cost reductions with SA were noted in OR supplies/medications ($7367.93 vs. $10,879.46; p = 0.039) and inpatient costs ($621.65 vs. $3092.66; p = 0.027). Within these categories, reductions were observed for intravenous solutions, sedatives/anesthetics, pressure management, labs, imaging, evaluations, hospital care, and medications. Although costs for implants, anesthesia care, OR time, and PACU fees were lower with SA, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In TLIF for DLSD, SA provides significant economic advantages over GA while yielding comparable clinical outcomes. These results support SA as a cost-effective alternative, warranting further prospective studies to confirm these findings. Full article

For the past two decades, the consideration of spinopelvic parameters, sagittal balance, and spine shape has gained importance in the diagnosis and optimal surgical management of painful adult spinal deformity. These principles are used with increasing frequency in the surgical planning and treatment of degenerative mechanical lower back pain. Several parameters exist to analyze both global and regional spinal balance. Chronic lower back pain due to degenerative disc disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis, or adult spinal deformity can be surgically managed in a multitude of ways ranging from simple decompression to multilevel arthrodesis with or without corrective osteotomies, depending on the presumed etiology of the pain, surgical planning, and the surgical goal. In surgical candidates, preoperative evaluation of spinopelvic parameters is paramount, as increasing evidence shows that restoration of the shape of the spine while respecting these parameters improves patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), decreases re-operation rates, and reduces mechanical complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/PJF), distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK/DJF), adjacent segment disease (ASD), and rod fracture. This review provides a conceptual analysis of spinopelvic alignment, global and regional sagittal balance, and the restoration of the spine’s shape in relation to patient outcomes during surgical treatment of degenerative spine disorders. Full article

Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no research has investigated postoperative radiological changes. The aim of this study is to analyze the radiological changes occurring in cases of early recurrence within six months after endoscopic foraminal decompression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unilateral lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic foraminotomy at a single institution. The study included 11 recurrent patients who initially experienced symptomatic improvement and sufficient neural decompression on radiological evaluation, but exhibited recurrent radicular pain and radiological restenosis within six months postoperatively. Additionally, 33 control patients with favourable clinical outcomes and no evidence of restenosis were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative plain X-ray imaging was used to evaluate sagittal and coronal parameters reflecting spinal anatomical characteristics, including disc height, foraminal height, disc wedging, coronal Cobb’s angle, total lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lumbar lordosis angle, and dynamic segmental lumbar lordosis angle. The study aimed to analyze postoperative changes in these parameters between the recurrent and control groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex distribution, presence of adjacent segment disease, or existence of Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological changes revealed that, in the recurrent group, disc height and foraminal height showed a significant decrease postoperatively, while disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle demonstrated a significant increase. In contrast, the control group exhibited a significant postoperative increase in the total lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lumbar lordosis angle. Conclusions: Progressive worsening of disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle, and reductions in disc and foraminal height, along with minimal improvement in lumbar lordosis following TELF, suggest the presence of irreversible preoperative degenerative changes. Careful radiologic assessment and close postoperative monitoring are essential to identify patients at risk of early recurrence. Full article

Background: Degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) affects older adults, causing lumbar degeneration and lower extremity dysfunction. The five-times sit-to-stand test (5xSTS) reveals kinematic changes associated with DLD. While marker-based motion capture systems detect these changes, their complexity limits clinical use. Markerless motion capture offers a portable alternative, yet its functional assessment applications in DLD remain underexplored. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of markerless motion capture for assessing functional tests in DLD patients. Methods: This study included 11 healthy individuals (mean age: 27.28 ± 6.92 years) and 10 with DLD (mean age: 70.00 ± 8.08 years). Participants performed the 5xSTS while being recorded by marker-based (VICON) and markerless (MediaPipe) systems using two synchronized cameras. Test–retest reliability was assessed over one week via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity and agreement between VICON and MediaPipe were evaluated via Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients, systematic bias, and the root mean square error (RMSE). Movement time, joint excursions, and angular velocities were also analyzed and compared across two groups. Results: Both systems showed high test–retest reliability (ICC: 0.81–0.99) and strong correlations (r: 0.75–0.99). The highest RMSE was observed at the ankle in the anterior–posterior (A–P) direction in the DLD group (54.55 mm) and at the hip A–P axis in the control group (51.20 mm). The lowest RMSE was found at the knee medial–lateral (M–L) axis in the DLD group (7.88 mm) and at the ankle M–L axis in the control group (8.54 mm). Bias values ranged from 0.30 mm (hip vertical in control group) to +53.47 mm (ankle A–P in DLD group), with underestimation more common at the hip and overestimation at the ankle. The control group demonstrated a faster 5xSTS completion time (5.89 ± 0.69 s vs. 8.13 ± 1.96 s, p < 0.05), greater hip joint excursions during sit-to-stand (65.07 ± 25.94° vs. 38.13 ± 9.84°, p < 0.05) and stand-to-sit (62.56 ± 24.74° vs. 27.85 ± 11.45°, p < 0.05) tests, and higher angular velocities compared to the DLD group. Conclusion: MediaPipe markerless motion capture can quantify 3D kinematic changes in DLD patients during functional performance. It enables a clinical evaluation with minimal setup, offers potential for remote assessment, and accurately detects sagittal plane movement. The two-camera system provides 3D kinematic data comparable to multi-camera systems, suitable for home rehabilitation and assessment. Full article

Background/Objectives: There are many concerns regarding adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion. However, there are few studies that analyze risk factors by classifying adjacent segment disease (ASD) by onset. This study aimed to investigate related factors according to the period of occurrence of ASD in mid- to long-term follow-up patients after lumbar spinal fusion. Methods: We analyzed 139 patients who underwent ≤3-segment lumbar fusion for degenerative disease with a minimum 5-year follow-up from a consecutive series of 457 patients. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) and early ASD (E-ASD, occurring ≤5 years) were evaluated, including patient factors (age, sex, BMI), preoperative factors (diagnosis, Pfirrmann grade), surgical factors (fusion method, number of segments), and radiological parameters (lumbar lordosis, fused segment angle, PI-LL mismatch). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were performed to identify independent risk factors. Results: A total of 28 patients underwent revision surgery for ASD. Among them, 14 patients developed E-ASD. In the analysis of risk factors for ASD, the fusion method, and the postoperative PI-LL were statistically significant (p = 0.003, HR = 4.670, and p = 0.008, HR = 3.102, respectively). Regarding E-ASD, the fusion method was statistically significant (p = 0.038, HR = 5.444). The cumulative survival rate of ASD was 93.7% at 5 years and 76.4% at 10 years. Conclusions: ASD risk factors vary temporally after fusion surgery. Early ASD is primarily associated with the PLIF technique, while long-term risk relates to both the fusion method and sagittal alignment. Surgical planning should consider both the fusion technique and sagittal balance optimization to minimize ASD risk. Full article

The lumbar degenerative cascade is a pathological process that affects most of the aging adult population and has significant negative economic consequences. Lumbar fusion surgery remains a mainstay of treatment for refractory degenerative disease but carries significant long-term consequences. More recently, lumbar arthroplasty and motion-sparing technology has become an increasingly popular alternative surgical option in carefully indicated patients. Arthroplasty technology carries the theoretical benefits of spinal segment motion preservation and decreased degeneration of adjacent segments as compared to traditional fusion procedures. This article will review the lumbar degenerative cascade and its related anatomic considerations, current management strategies and the challenges surrounding lumbar spinal fusion, including adjacent segment disease. This article will also review the theoretical benefits of lumbar arthroplasty and motion preservation. Furthermore, this paper will highlight the current state of lumbar arthroplasty, including current concepts of implant design, limitations, outcomes and ongoing development. It will review the development and current state of artificial disk arthroplasty, total joint arthroplasty and posterior column motion-preserving implants, including flexible rods and facet joint replacement. Full article