Search Results (80)

(1) Aim: To compare transverse dimensions measured on AI-generated intra-oral models and conventional digital intra-oral models. (2) Methods: A group of 38 patients treated with clear aligners was selected retrospectively from those whose records featured both AI-generated and conventional digital intra-oral models taken at the same timepoint. Transverse dimensions (inter-canine, inter-premolar, and inter-molar distances) on both upper and lower arches were evaluated and compared. Intra-class correlation index and paired t-test were applied to test the repeatability of measurements and statistically significant differences, respectively. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. (3) Results: Intra-class correlation index showed good repeatability. Paired t-test showed differences in measurements of the distances between the thicket area of gingiva on the palatal side of the upper first molar (p = 0.002), the gingival margin of the lower first molar (p = 0.014), and the mesio-vestibular cusps of the lower first molars (p = 0.019). (4) Conclusions: Transverse measurements were similar on AI-generated and conventional intra-oral .stl renderings. Statistical differences were found on posterior areas of both upper and lower dental arches, but are unlikely to be clinically significant. Full article

Background/Objectives: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. Methods: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec^®, SAREMCO Dental AG—Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al₂O₃ (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (Ra) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). Results: The AA group showed the highest Ra (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (p < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. Conclusions: Sandblasting with Al₂O₃ particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications. Full article

Background: Distalization is a fundamental orthodontic strategy for correcting Class II and Class III malocclusions, particularly in cases where specific dental or skeletal conditions favor its application. Recent technological advances have enabled complex dental movements to be performed using clear aligners, aided by digital planning platforms such as ClinCheck^®. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ClinCheck^® in predicting molar and canine distalization outcomes with the Invisalign^® system and to identify clinical factors influencing treatment predictability. Thirty patients with complete permanent dentition and at least 2 mm of programmed distalization were selected. Planned movements were extracted from the Invisalign^® Doctor Site and compared to achieved outcomes using Geomagic^® Control X™ software. Occlusal improvements were assessed using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. Results: The results revealed significant discrepancies between the programmed and achieved distalization, with mean deviations greater than 1 mm in both arches. Skeletal anchorage with mini-screws significantly improved distalization outcomes in the maxillary arch; however, no significant effect was observed in the mandibular arch. Additionally, no significant associations were found between distalization outcomes and skeletal pattern (ANB angle) or facial biotype. Conclusions: Clear aligners are effective in achieving substantial occlusal improvements, particularly when combined with personalized digital planning and supplementary strategies such as skeletal anchorage. Mandibular cases demonstrated greater reductions in PAR scores, emphasizing the potential of aligners in complex distalization treatments. Full article

This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of two resin materials, Tera Harz TC-85 DAC and Clear-A, along with the effects of two different post-printing protocols applied to Clear-A. Samples were produced using the Ackuretta Sol printer. The following three groups were formed based on the resins used and the post-curing methods applied: Group 1: Tera Harz TC-85 DAC resin + Tera Harz Cure; Group 2: Clear-A resin + Curie machine; and Group 3: Clear-A resin + Tera Harz Cure. All samples were sterilized in 70% ethanol for 5 min, rinsed with sterile deionized water, and incubated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium at 37 °C for 72 h. Cytotoxicity assessment was performed by the XTT and RTCA methods using the human gingival fibroblast cell line. According to the XTT assay, undiluted resin extracts exhibited approximately 75–80% cell viability at 24 h, while further dilutions resulted in a viability exceeding 90%. No significant differences in viability were observed among the groups at any dilution at 48 and 72 h. The xCELLigence RTCA results aligned with the XTT findings, showing a transient decrease in cell viability within the first 24 h, followed by continued cell growth. This study demonstrated that extracts from all tested 3D-printed resins exhibited biocompatibility with human gingival fibroblasts. These findings support their potential for further applications in the dental and biomedical fields. Full article

Background and Objectives: To systematically map and evaluate the current literature on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in teleorthodontics, focusing on clinical use, technological approaches, outcomes, and limitations. Materials and Methods: A scoping review was conducted following a formal and recognized methodological framework. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched until 30 April 2025. Studies were included if they reported original data on AI applications in orthodontic remote monitoring or virtual care. Data extraction focused on study design, type of AI, clinical setting, reported outcomes, and main findings. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Most research focused on the use of the Dental Monitoring™ (DM) system, which employs deep learning algorithms to analyze intraoral scans captured via smartphones. Reported benefits included reduced in-office visits (up to 33%), accurate 3D tracking of tooth movement, improved hygiene compliance, and high patient engagement. However, significant variability was observed in the repeatability and precision of AI decisions, especially in GO/NO-GO aligner progression instructions. One study explored an alternative system, StrojCHECK™, based on a decision tree algorithm, showing improved compliance with personalized feedback. Conclusions: AI-powered teleorthodontic systems show potential to enhance treatment efficiency and patient engagement, particularly in aligner therapy. However, their current clinical application remains narrowly focused on commercial monitoring platforms, with limited validation and transparency. This review highlights the early stage of real-world AI integration in orthodontics, underlining the need for independent validation, broader applications beyond monitoring, and robust ethical frameworks. In this context, AI should be used as a complementary tool, never a substitute, for clinical judgment. Full article

Background/Objectives: Previous studies on clear aligner therapy (CAT) in mixed dentition primarily focused on the predictability of maxillary arch expansion. However, limited evidence is available regarding mandibular arch changes, particularly in relation to inter-arch coordination. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and predictability of dental expansion in both the upper and lower arches using Invisalign First^® aligners. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with 15 participants. Dental expansions were assessed before and after treatment using iTero intraoral scans processed with 3D analysis software. Measurements were compared to the predicted movements planned in ClinCheck^®. Data normality was verified (Shapiro–Wilk test), descriptive statistics were calculated, and paired t-tests were performed to compare clinical and predicted expansions, with significance set at 0.05. Results: Clear aligners achieved effective dento-alveolar expansion in both arches. Predictability was higher at the cusp level than at the gingival level, indicating a tendency toward tipping movements rather than bodily expansion. The study also highlighted mandibular expansion outcomes and gingival-level discrepancies, providing new insights compared to the previous literature. Minor differences between predicted and achieved movements were observed, partly attributable to natural growth and deciduous tooth exfoliation. Conclusions: Clear aligners are effective in achieving maxillary and mandibular arch expansion in mixed dentition, with good predictability at the coronal level. Overengineering buccal root torque may help promote bodily expansion and reduce cuspal–gingival discrepancies. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to optimize treatment planning and predictability. Full article

Background/Objectives: Currently, clear aligners are preferred to conventional appliances, especially among adult patients. However, the use of aligners for treating maxillary constriction is still debated in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess maxillary dentoalveolar expansion following clear aligner therapy in adults using CBCT scans. Methods: The study sample encompassed 50 non-growing patients (27 females and 23 males) aged 20 to 42 undergoing clear aligner orthodontics without dental extractions or auxiliaries. Transverse linear distances were measured on initial and final CBCTs and, subsequently, analysed through paired t-test and ANOVA. We considered alveolar bone measurements and interdental widths measured at the buccal apices and cusps from canines to second molars. Results: The buccal alveolar ridge width showed the greatest expansion (1.01 ± 0.38 mm), followed by the palatal alveolar ridge and maxillary alveolar bone. Statistically significant improvements were observed for all interdental measurements. The most considerable changes occurred in the interpremolar cusp distances, while the least changes were seen in the intermolar apex distances. At the cusp level, the average interpremolar widths increased by 3.44 ± 0.22 mm for the first premolars and 3.14 ± 0.27 mm for the second ones. Conclusions: Clear aligner treatment can effectively manage a constricted maxillary arch. We found significant changes in the maxillary alveolar bone. Both inter-apex and inter-cusp widths increased in all teeth, with the highest values in the premolars. Moreover, the increases in interdental distances at both apex and cusp levels were related to tooth position. Full article

Lateral cephalometric analysis is commonly used in orthodontics for skeletal classification to ensure an accurate and reliable diagnosis for treatment planning. However, most current research depends on analyzing different type of radiographs, which requires more computational time than 3D analysis. Consequently, this study addresses fully automatic orthodontics tracing based on the usage of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to 2D and 3D images, by designing a cephalometric system that analyzes the significant landmarks and regions of interest (ROI) needed in orthodontics tracing, especially for the mandible and maxilla teeth. In this research, a computerized system is developed to automate the tasks of orthodontics evaluation during 2D and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT or 3D) systems measurements. This work was tested on a dataset that contains images of males and females obtained from dental hospitals with patient-informed consent. The dataset consists of 2D lateral cephalometric, panorama and CBCT radiographs. Many scenarios were applied to test the proposed system in landmark prediction and detection. Moreover, this study integrates the Grad-CAM (Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping) technique to generate heat maps, providing transparent visualization of the regions the model focuses on during its decision-making process. By enhancing the interpretability of deep learning predictions, Grad-CAM strengthens clinical confidence in the system’s outputs, ensuring that ROI detection aligns with orthodontic diagnostic standards. This explainability is crucial in medical AI applications, where understanding model behavior is as important as achieving high accuracy. The experimental results achieved an accuracy exceeding 98.9%. This research evaluates and differentiates between the two-dimensional and the three-dimensional tracing analyses applied to measurements based on the practices of the European Board of Orthodontics. The results demonstrate the proposed methodology’s robustness when applied to cephalometric images. Furthermore, the evaluation of 3D analysis usage provides a clear understanding of the significance of integrated deep-learning techniques in orthodontics. Full article

This systematic review aims to further current knowledge on the effects of microplastics from orthodontic clear aligners, identifying potential implications for human health and providing a basis for further research and development of alternative materials. A literature search to find all peer-reviewed citations relevant to the review topic was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on 31 December 2024. A manual search of grey literature was also performed. There were 62 citations retrieved by the search query, and 11 were selected for inclusion in the review. Four selected studies were in vitro, while seven were in vitro following intraoral material aging studies. Ten studies evaluated the surface morphology of the material after aging, among the mechanical characteristics assessed, while only one article evaluated the chemical characteristics and size of the microplastic particles released from the aligners after simulated in vitro use. Discussion: From the evaluation of the studies included in this review, it is possible to state that there is a gradual increase over time in the surface roughness of the material, and modifications occurred in the morphology and surface topography of the aligners. Furthermore, it emerged that dispersion of microplastics occurs during the use of different types of aligners, with microplastic particle sizes ranging from 5 to 20 μm The findings suggest that clear aligners may cause microplastic dispersion in saliva during therapy, and this could cause a problem for the general health of patients, due to the absorption or ingestion of these released molecules. Further research is needed to fully understand the extent of microplastics released from aligners and to find alternative materials that can reduce this occurrence. Full article

(1) The aim was to evaluate the predictability of treatment outcomes using clear aligner therapy (CAT) and ClinCheck Web 1.4 (Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) software in mandibular incisor intrusion in both children and adults with deep bite malocclusion. (2) This study included healthy children and adults with skeletal Class I or mild to moderate Class II/III malocclusions, mild to moderate dental crowding (<5 mm), and deep overbite (OB) who underwent CAT. Pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) orthodontic treatment records were assessed and compared to initial planned ClinCheck movements. The cephalometric parameters evaluated included bodily intrusion (Centroid-C point), IMPA, L1-NB, and L1-A-Po. Clinical expression of CAT was compared to ClinCheck predictions using paired sample t-tests, and differences between growing and non-growing groups were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post hoc analysis. (3) The sample included 48 patients (mean age 19.79 ± 11.78 years), including 18 adults (mean age 30.28 ± 13.79 years) and 30 children (mean age 13.5 ± 2.05 years). The predicted vertical mandibular incisor movement (intrusion) was significantly higher using ClinCheck (2.32 mm) compared to clinical treatment (0.22 mm). The angular movements of IMPA, L1-NB, and L1-APo were all significantly higher using ClinCheck (4.6°) compared to clinical expression of 0.79°, 0.55°, and 1.21°, respectively. There were no significant differences between children and adults with respect to vertical or angular tooth movements. (4) CAT and ClinCheck software significantly overpredicts orthodontic tooth movements related to mandibular incisor intrusion in both adults and children with no statistical difference between the groups. Full article

Background/Objectives: The growing demand for esthetic, less painful, and more comfortable orthodontic treatment has led to increasing use of aligner systems. Initially used for less complicated malocclusions, aligners are now being incorporated into complex treatment plans, including cases involving impacted teeth. While aligners are a popular alternative to traditional fixed appliances, they still have limitations. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of aligner-based orthodontic treatment in patients with impacted or significantly ectopic canines. Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms used were as follows: ‘Clear Aligner’ OR ‘Invisalign’ AND ‘Impacted Canine’ OR ‘Impacted Tooth’ OR ‘Ectopic Tooth’ OR ‘Ectopic Canine.’ A total of 1101 records were identified, of which 170 articles underwent screening. Fifteen articles were assessed for eligibility, and ultimately six case reports and one three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) study were included for both quantitative and qualitative synthesis. Results: According to the studies, additional appliances are often required to achieve favorable outcomes when treating impacted canines with aligner systems. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) were used in 5 out of 9 reported cases for canine traction into the dental arch. In three cases, TADs were combined with sectional wires implemented as cantilevers. Elastics were used in 6 out of 9 cases for traction to the opposite arch, and in 5 out of 9 cases as interarch elastics attached to the aligners. Interarch elastics were applied in various ways, either directly to the aligners or to primary canines using hidden buttons inside pontics or dovetail hooks. Elastics were also anchored to the lower arch with class II, class III, or cross-arch (criss-cross) mechanics. Conclusions: This review highlights the promising potential of aligner systems in the treatment of impacted canines. However, additional auxiliaries, such as TADs, sectional wires, or elastics remain nearly essential for initial canine traction. Aligner systems offer versatile treatment options, and the possibility of reduced treatment time represents a valuable area for future research. Full article

Objective: Intraoral scanners (IOS) provide high-precision 3D data of teeth and gingiva, critical for personalized orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. However, traditional segmentation methods exhibit reduced performance with complex dental structures, such as crowded, missing, or irregular teeth, constraining their clinical applicability. This study aims to develop an advanced 3D point cloud segmentation model to enhance the automated processing of IOS data in intricate orthodontic scenarios. Methods: A 3D point cloud segmentation model was developed, incorporating relative coordinate encoding, Transformer-based self-attention, and attention pooling mechanisms. This design optimizes the extraction of local geometric features and long-range dependencies while maintaining a balance between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency. Training and evaluation were conducted using internal and external orthodontic datasets. Results: The model achieved a mean Intersection over Union (IoU) of 92.14% on the internal dataset and 91.73% on the external dataset, with Dice coefficients consistently surpassing those of established models, including PointNet++, TSGCN, and PointTransformer, demonstrating superior segmentation accuracy and robust generalization. Conclusions: The model significantly enhances tooth segmentation accuracy in complex orthodontic scenarios, such as crowded or irregular dentitions, enabling orthodontists to formulate treatment plans and simulate outcomes with greater precision—for example, optimizing clear aligner design or improving tooth arrangement efficiency. Its computational efficiency supports clinical applicability without excessive resource consumption. However, due to the limited sample size and potential influences from advancements in IOS technology, the model’s generalizability requires further clinical testing and optimization in real-world orthodontic settings. Full article

Clear aligners are a modern orthodontic solution designed to address dental malocclusions discreetly and effectively. In terms of clinical side effects, the most reported issues among aligner users are mild irritation of the oral mucosa, localized inflammation, and hypersensitivity. The use of advanced polymer materials in clear aligners, such as polyurethane and PET-G, has gained widespread acceptance due to their mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and aesthetic appeal. However, concerns persist regarding their potential to release chemical compounds. Our goal is to understand the impact of clear aligner toxicity on the oral cavity of orthodontic patients. An extensive systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane to identify articles with relevant data. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA) to answer a question formulated according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes. Four hundred and thirteen articles potentially relevant were identified and after applying PRISMA guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria, seven articles were included in this review. Our results suggest that clear aligners are generally safe, but concerns remain regarding the chemical leaching of thermoplastic materials, bacterial accumulation due to reduced saliva flow, and mild inflammatory responses. Our review emphasizes that although most materials are biocompatible, some exhibit moderate cytotoxicity, with the potential to impact these patients’ oral health, underscoring the need for continued research and improvements in material composition. Full article

Background: A transverse discrepancy refers to a dimensional difference in the transverse component of the upper and lower dental arches with functional and esthetic implications. The main purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of transverse expansion movement of dentoalveolar nature performed by two innovative orthodontic appliances: elastodontic devices and clear aligners. Specifically, it is intended to determine which of the two methods is more effective in terms of dentoalveolar expansion in a sample of children with mixed dentition. Methods: In total, 29 patients aged 6 to 13 years with mixed dentition were included in the present study and divided into two groups according to a case–control scheme. Of the subjects, 15 (8 females and 7 males) represented the test group and were treated with Eptamed elastodontic devices, while the control group, consisting of 14 patients (12 females and 2 males), received a Spark aligner. The efficacy of the devices was evaluated by comparing cross-sectional measurements of the arch scans at time T0 (before the start of treatment), T1 (6 months after the start of treatment) and T2 (one year after the start of treatment) by measurement in mm of the distance between the palatal cusps of the first upper premolar (if missing, of the corresponding deciduous molar). Statistical analysis was conducted using a nonparametric approach with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The data resulting from the measurements were expressed as the mean (standard deviation). Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups at either T0 (p = 0.3), T1 (p = 0.78), or T2 (p = 0.66), thus allowing the conclusion that both treatment modalities are comparable. Conclusions: Both elastodontics and clear aligners proved to be effective devices in the treatment of transverse discrepancies of a dentoalveolar nature. Elastodontics also plays a crucial role in the rebalancing of stomatognathic and extrastomatognathic functions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Direct-to-Consumer Orthodontics (DTCO) has gained popularity through social media, offering clear aligner treatments without in-person supervision. However, there is limited research on the related user experiences, satisfaction, and complications, particularly in Spain. This study aimed to evaluate user experiences, satisfaction levels, and complications associated with DTCO in a sample of Spanish consumers. Additionally, differences among major DTCO providers were analyzed. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted over one year. This questionnaire, adapted from previous studies and reviewed by certified orthodontists, assessed user awareness, reasons for treatment selection, communication with providers, discomfort, complications, and satisfaction. A total of 101 valid responses were analyzed using statistical means. Results: The majority of respondents reported that their expectations were not met, and they would not recommend DTCO. Cost was the primary motivation for treatment selection, followed by convenience. Many users experienced complications, leading to dental consultations. While overall satisfaction levels did not significantly differ among providers, variations were observed in discomfort levels, in-person care availability, and the need for additional consultations. Conclusions: DTCO offers affordability and convenience but raises concerns regarding treatment quality and supervision. In most cases, users’ expectations were not met, highlighting the need for greater patient education and regulatory oversight. Full article