Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (34)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = alveolar ridge preservation (ARP)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 11221 KB  
Article
Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) with a Subperiosteal Cortical Lamina: A Retrospective Observational Case Series
by Orlando Guerra Cobian, Giacomo Mainetti, Franco Bengazi, Tomaso Mainetti, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Mie Nonaka and Daniele Botticelli
Dent. J. 2026, 14(6), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14060361 - 11 Jun 2026
Viewed by 533
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the dimensional behavior of an alveolar ridge preservation approach based on the placement of a subperiosteal heterologous cortical collagenic bone lamina without the use of particulate grafting material under routine clinical conditions. Methods: Seventy consecutive patients, each contributing [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the dimensional behavior of an alveolar ridge preservation approach based on the placement of a subperiosteal heterologous cortical collagenic bone lamina without the use of particulate grafting material under routine clinical conditions. Methods: Seventy consecutive patients, each contributing one extraction site, were included. All sites were treated with a cortical lamina placed on the buccal aspect of the socket immediately after tooth extraction. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained before extraction and after approximately 6 months of healing. Crestal width and vertical dimensions at the buccal, central, and lingual aspects were measured. An exploratory subgroup analysis was also performed according to the tooth region. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 6.1 ± 1.4 months, the mean crestal width decreased from 8.4 ± 2.8 mm to 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, corresponding to a mean reduction of −0.6 ± 2.0 mm (p = 0.001). The central vertical measurement showed no significant change (0.4 ± 2.6 mm; p = 0.531). Buccal height remained stable, whereas lingual height showed a small reduction (−0.6 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.005). The exploratory subgroup analysis revealed a width change of −0.3 ± 1.6 mm for anterior sites and 0.1 ± 2.0 mm for premolar sites while a more pronounced reduction in ridge dimensions was observed at molar sites (−2.2 ± 1.6 mm). Conclusions: The cortical lamina approach was associated with limited post-extraction dimensional changes and may represent a useful option for alveolar ridge preservation without the use of particulate grafting material, although less favorable dimensional stability may be expected in molar regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Implantology and Bone Regeneration: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2872 KB  
Systematic Review
Effectiveness of β-TriCalcium Phosphate for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review
by Vitolante Pezzella, Andrea Blasi, Leopoldo Mauriello, Giuseppe Trapanese, Elio Ramaglia, Michele Basilicata, Vincenzo Iorio-Siciliano and Luca Ramaglia
J. Funct. Biomater. 2026, 17(5), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17050247 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 878
Abstract
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) aims to reduce post-extraction bone resorption and facilitate implant placement. Among alloplastic grafts, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is widely used due to its osteoconductive properties and complete resorbability. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of β-TCP for ARP, focusing [...] Read more.
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) aims to reduce post-extraction bone resorption and facilitate implant placement. Among alloplastic grafts, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is widely used due to its osteoconductive properties and complete resorbability. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of β-TCP for ARP, focusing on ridge dimensional changes assessed by cone–beam computed tomography (CBCT). Electronic searches were performed in major scientific databases up to April 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting CBCT-based dimensional outcomes after at least 4 months were included. Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in biomaterial formulations, socket management, and outcome assessment. When used alone, β-TCP showed variable results, ranging from greater ridge resorption compared with xenograft to outcomes comparable with those of freeze-dried bone allograft. More consistent findings were reported when β-TCP was used in combination with other biomaterials, with outcomes generally comparable to those of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Overall, β-TCP may have a potential role in alveolar ridge preservation; however, evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Differences between β-TCP alone and composite formulations should be carefully considered, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding its comparative predictability versus xenografts. Further RCTs are needed to clarify its clinical effectiveness and identify optimal applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials Applied in Dental Sciences (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1080 KB  
Article
Immediate vs. Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Procedures with Xeno-Hybrid Bovine Bone Graft: A Retrospective Cohort with Operator-Level Comparison
by Marius Meier, Pascal Grün, Tim Schiepek, Pina Jankowski, Anna Bandura, Sebastian Fitzek, Flora Turhani and Dritan Turhani
Diagnostics 2026, 16(8), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081231 - 20 Apr 2026
Viewed by 799
Abstract
Background: In everyday practice, we observed an increased number of complications with a xeno-hybrid bovine graft in challenging cases, prompting a systematic review of timing strategies and the impact of the operator. Objective: To compare early safety and rehabilitation timelines for immediate versus [...] Read more.
Background: In everyday practice, we observed an increased number of complications with a xeno-hybrid bovine graft in challenging cases, prompting a systematic review of timing strategies and the impact of the operator. Objective: To compare early safety and rehabilitation timelines for immediate versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge procedures with a xeno-hybrid bovine graft, and to examine operator-level effects. Materials and Methods: Single center retrospective cohort (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; January 2021–October 2023). Consecutive patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) or reconstruction (ARR; conservative protocol without meshes or rigid frameworks) with a xeno-hybrid bovine graft and subsequent implant were included. Strata: ARP, ARR, ARP with immediate implant placement (ARP+II), ARR with immediate implant placement (ARR+II). Primary endpoint: early implant loss < 12 months after the index surgery. Secondary endpoints: days to implant exposure and days to definitive prosthesis. Results: We analyzed 158 coded interventions (ARP 33; ARR 16; ARP+II 32; ARR+II 77). Early implant loss was uncommon (7/158; 4.4%) and occurred only with immediate implant placement (ARP+II 6.3%; ARR+II 6.5%); no early failures occurred in delayed strata. Immediate implant placement accelerated rehabilitation (exposure: 358/364 vs. 144/162 days; prosthesis: 406/419 vs. 196/204 days; both p < 0.0001). After adjustment for treatment base, timing, and age, no independent operator level effect on early loss was detected. Conclusions: In this university cohort using a xeno-hybrid bovine graft, early implant loss was rare and confined to immediate implant placement, which nonetheless shortened the pathway to exposure and restoration by ~5–7 months. Differences across providers were explained by case selection and protocol choice after adjustment. Clinical Significance: With appropriate case selection and surgical execution, immediate implant placement after ARP/ARR can reduce treatment time by ~5–7 months without a clear increase in early failure within the limits of this cohort; treatment protocol and case triage are the main levers of early outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2628 KB  
Article
Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) Using a Cortical Lamina: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
by Giacomo Mainetti, Franco Bengazi, Tomaso Mainetti, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Andrea Grassi, Eddy Troya Borges and Daniele Botticelli
Dent. J. 2026, 14(4), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14040193 - 24 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1034
Abstract
Background/Obectives: Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction compromises esthetics and implant placement. Conventional alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) relies on grafting. This randomized controlled study evaluated a graft-free, lamina-based approach aimed at preserving ridge morphology by protecting the buccal cortical plate. Methods: Forty alveoli [...] Read more.
Background/Obectives: Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction compromises esthetics and implant placement. Conventional alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) relies on grafting. This randomized controlled study evaluated a graft-free, lamina-based approach aimed at preserving ridge morphology by protecting the buccal cortical plate. Methods: Forty alveoli were randomly assigned to Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) with a subperiosteally positioned cortical lamina (test) or unassisted healing (control; CTRL). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before extraction and after five months. Vertical and horizontal dimensional changes were statistically compared. Results: Healing was uneventful. At five months, the G-ARP group showed a vertical gain of 0.5 mm and a horizontal reduction of 0.2 mm, whereas the CTRL group exhibited a vertical loss of 1.7 mm (p < 0.01) and a horizontal loss of 2.7 mm (p < 0.001). Effect sizes were large for vertical change and very large for horizontal change (Hedges’ g = 0.95 and 2.19, respectively). Regeneration occurred through native bone formation without grafts. Conclusions: Subperiosteal placement of a cortical lamina effectively preserved ridge dimensions after extraction. This graft-free approach may offer technical and biological advantages while supporting new bone regeneration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone Augmentation in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 6410 KB  
Article
Optical Coherence Tomography, Stereomicroscopic, and Histological Aspects of Bone Regeneration on Rat Calvaria in the Presence of Bovine Xenograft or Titanium-Reinforced Hydroxyapatite
by Andrei Radu, Antonia Samia Khaddour, Mihaela Ionescu, Cristina Maria Munteanu, Eugen Osiac, Oana Gîngu, Cristina Teișanu, Valentin Octavian Mateescu, Cristina Elena Andrei and Sanda Mihaela Popescu
J. Funct. Biomater. 2026, 17(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17010026 - 1 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1106
Abstract
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques have evolved with implantology development. In clinical practice, biomaterials for ARP are tested in laboratory animals, and rat calvaria is a standard option. The study aimed to evaluate biomaterial osteointegration in defects created in the rat calvaria, [...] Read more.
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques have evolved with implantology development. In clinical practice, biomaterials for ARP are tested in laboratory animals, and rat calvaria is a standard option. The study aimed to evaluate biomaterial osteointegration in defects created in the rat calvaria, comparing an experimental synthetic biomaterial with a bovine xenograft and natural healing. Methods: The study included six groups of animals: two negative control groups with natural healing (2 months (M) and 4 M), two positive control groups with bovine xenograft (2 M and 4 M), and two study groups with nanohydroxyapatite titanium reinforced (2M and 4M). After creating and grafting the defects, healing was expected to take 2 or 4 months, after which bone fragments were harvested, prepared, and then analyzed. OCT, stereomicroscopy, and histology techniques were used for bone fragments analysis, and the obtained images were evaluated using Image J 1.54p software. Results: The results obtained from the three analyses provided information about the healing pattern of bone defects and the degree of new bone formation. Histological analysis of the samples confirmed what the stereomicroscopy and OCT images showed: that the bovine xenograft elicited a better tissue response than the synthetic biomaterial, being incorporated into the bone tissue more than the synthetic biomaterial. Conclusions: Both the bovine xenograft and the synthetic nanocomposite based on hydroxyapatite reinforced with titanium particles favored bone healing, but their integration into the bone was limited for the analyzed period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials in Bone Reconstruction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3484 KB  
Article
Clinical and Histological Assessment of Knife-Edge Thread Implant Stability After Ridge Preservation Using Hydroxyapatite and Sugar Cross-Linked Collagen: Preliminary Report
by Lidija Veljkovic, Miljana Nedeljkovic, Gvozden Rosic, Dragica Selakovic, Nemanja Jovicic, Momir Stevanovic, Jovana Milanovic, Aleksandra Arnaut, Milica Vasiljevic and Pavle Milanovic
Dent. J. 2025, 13(12), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120585 - 8 Dec 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 910
Abstract
Background: Primary stability of dental implants depends on bone quality, bone quantity, and implant design. In cases of large defects, such as periapical lesions, the selection of an appropriate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) material is crucial for bone regeneration and preparation for [...] Read more.
Background: Primary stability of dental implants depends on bone quality, bone quantity, and implant design. In cases of large defects, such as periapical lesions, the selection of an appropriate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) material is crucial for bone regeneration and preparation for implant placement. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and histological outcomes of a novel ARP material hydroxyapatite and sugar cross-linked collagen (HSCC) combined with a knife-edge thread implant (KTI) design. Methods: Thirty patients were divided into two groups: a control group treated with KTI after spontaneous alveolar ridge healing, and an experimental group that underwent ARP using HSCC, and six months later, KTIs were placed in newly formed bone. Clinical parameters including insertion torque value (ITV), resonance frequency analysis (RFA), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and horizontal bone dimension were evaluated. Histological analysis was also performed. Results: No significant differences were observed between groups in ITV, ISQ, or horizontal bone dimension (p > 0.05). However, histological analysis demonstrated a significantly higher number of active osteoblasts in the ARP group compared to the control (p < 0.001), whereas collagen deposition was significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: ARP using HSCC, combined with KTI, provides favorable conditions for primary stability and successful graft integration, supporting reliable implant placement in sites with bone defects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone Augmentation in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 2269 KB  
Systematic Review
Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Ioanna Benekou, Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Georgios S. Chatzopoulos and Ioannis Vouros
Dent. J. 2025, 13(12), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120556 - 25 Nov 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2884
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction, focusing on the percentage of new bone formation and residual graft material. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [...] Read more.
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction, focusing on the percentage of new bone formation and residual graft material. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing histomorphometric outcomes in humans were included. Eligible studies compared ARP using various graft materials to unassisted socket healing. Primary outcome was new bone formation (%); secondary outcome was residual graft material (%). Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted based on graft material type, membrane application, and healing duration. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE, respectively. Results: Twenty-two RCTs (816 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, ARP did not result in significantly greater new bone formation compared to spontaneous healing (mean difference −5.86%, 95% CI: −13.84% to 2.11%, p = 0.15; I2 = 98%), revealing a paradoxical trend: while ARP maintains ridge volume, histologically it may yield slightly lower proportions of vital bone compared to unassisted healing. However, autologous biomaterials (e.g., PRF/CGF) and xenografts with collagen membranes showed significantly new bone formation (mean differences +16.28% and −22.47%; p< 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Residual graft content was highest in relation to xenografts and allografts, particularly without membranes. Long-term studies demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for ARP following excluding high-risk trials. Conclusions: Histological advantage of ARP is biomaterial-dependent. Autologous platelet concentrates and xenografts with membranes yielded the most consistent bone regeneration outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Although ARP preserves socket volume, its histological superiority over natural healing is not universal. Therefore, the selection of biomaterials and determination of and appropriate healing period are critical parameters. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 4862 KB  
Review
Comparative Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft, or Spontaneous Healing for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Abeer S. Al-Zawawi, Amani M. Basudan, Rand Osama Alkhani, Lamis Khalid Alraddadi, Shikha Fahad Bin-Muhayya, Layan Abdullah Alzuwayyid, Deemah Alsaeed, Eithar Ibrahim Alrosaa, Lana Mohammed Alrasheed, Muneerah Abduaziz Alfahad, Ghadeer Mohammed Almutairi, Jana Alawad, Wasan Saeed Koaban, Munirah Naeem Alsubaie and Sundar Ramalingam
Bioengineering 2025, 12(11), 1253; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12111253 - 16 Nov 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3131
Abstract
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is crucial for maintaining bone and soft-tissue integrity after tooth extraction, thereby facilitating future implant placement. Among various biomaterials, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are commonly used; however, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review [...] Read more.
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is crucial for maintaining bone and soft-tissue integrity after tooth extraction, thereby facilitating future implant placement. Among various biomaterials, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are commonly used; however, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of PRF, FDBA, and spontaneous healing with blood clot in ARP, incorporating recent randomized controlled trials and comparative studies published up to June 2025. Electronic searches were conducted across multiple databases following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Primary outcomes included changes in alveolar ridge height and width, while secondary outcomes encompassed histological, radiographic, implant-related, and patient-centered measures. Twenty studies were included for qualitative synthesis and sixteen for quantitative analysis. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference between PRF and FDBA in ridge height (SMD = −0.24; 95% CI: −0.56 to 0.08; p = 0.145) or width preservation (SMD = −0.16; 95% CI: −0.73 to 0.42; p = 0.597). PRF significantly reduced ridge height loss compared to spontaneous healing (SMD = −0.79; 95% CI: −1.33 to −0.25; p = 0.004) and enhanced histologic new bone formation (SMD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.39 to 2.47; p = 0.007), while FDBA showed a non-significant trend toward benefit (SMD = −0.37; 95% CI: −0.86 to 0.11; p = 0.129). Moderate risk-of-bias and heterogeneity were observed among included studies. In conclusion, PRF and FDBA are both effective for alveolar ridge preservation, outperforming spontaneous healing. PRF offers biologically driven benefits in bone quality and soft-tissue healing, whereas FDBA provides greater structural stability. These findings suggest a promising clinical potential for PRF in improving bone quality at the implant site. Moreover, considering cost, preparation complexity, and site-specific needs, PRF may serve as a cost-effective, clinically favorable option for ARP. Future multi-center randomized trials with standardized PRF protocols and long-term follow-up are recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Periodontics and Implant Dentistry)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 1061 KB  
Systematic Review
Autologous Tooth-Derived Biomaterials in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Histological Evidence
by Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Grazia Marinelli, Francesco Inchingolo, Roberto Vito Giorgio, Valeria Colonna, Benito Francesco Pio Pennacchio, Massimo Del Fabbro, Gianluca Tartaglia, Andrea Palermo, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo and Gianna Dipalma
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(10), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16100367 - 1 Oct 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3257
Abstract
Background: Autologous tooth-derived grafts have recently gained attention as an innovative alternative to conventional biomaterials for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and augmentation (ARA). Their structural similarity to bone and osteoinductive potential support clinical use. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA [...] Read more.
Background: Autologous tooth-derived grafts have recently gained attention as an innovative alternative to conventional biomaterials for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and augmentation (ARA). Their structural similarity to bone and osteoinductive potential support clinical use. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251108128). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010–2025). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), split-mouth, and prospective clinical studies evaluating autologous dentin-derived grafts were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2.0 (for RCTs) and ROBINS-I (for non-randomized studies). Results: Nine studies involving 321 patients were included. Autologous dentin grafts effectively preserved ridge dimensions, with horizontal and vertical bone loss significantly reduced compared to controls. Histomorphometric analyses reported 42–56% new bone formation within 4–6 months, with minimal residual graft particles and favorable vascularization. Implant survival ranged from 96–100%, with stable marginal bone levels and no major complications. Conclusions: Autologous tooth-derived biomaterials represent a safe, biologically active, and cost-effective option for alveolar bone regeneration, showing comparable or superior results to xenografts and autologous bone. Further standardized, long-term RCTs are warranted to confirm their role in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Property, Evaluation and Development of Dentin Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 262 KB  
Review
Adjunctive Use of Biologics in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Narrative Review
by Celine Soon, Pradeep Koppolu and Leticia Algarves Miranda
Oral 2025, 5(3), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5030060 - 15 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2320
Abstract
Background: The purpose of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is to minimise the physiological alveolar ridge reduction occurring after dental extraction, which can prevent the need for future alveolar ridge augmentation. Biologic materials (biologics) promote tissue regeneration based on their effect on wound healing [...] Read more.
Background: The purpose of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is to minimise the physiological alveolar ridge reduction occurring after dental extraction, which can prevent the need for future alveolar ridge augmentation. Biologic materials (biologics) promote tissue regeneration based on their effect on wound healing at a cellular level. By integrating biologics into ARP biomaterials, there is a potential to enhance the regeneration of both hard and soft tissues with greater efficacy. Aim: This narrative review aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the addition of biologics to existing ARP materials on the physiological changes following ARP of an extraction site. Methods: A search of the PubMed electronic database was conducted, and relevant articles were examined. Sixty-three articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Results and Conclusions: A review of the existing literature found that the combination of biologics with ARP materials resulted in similar dimensional changes when compared to using ARP materials alone. Existing research has identified an enhancement in bone density, increased wound healing capacity of soft and hard tissue, and a reduction in post-operative pain. Whilst the addition of biologics to ARP materials has shown an increase in bone density, its effectiveness in improving implant outcomes and reducing the need for future alveolar ridge augmentation is unclear. Recognising the limitations within the existing literature, along with the risk of bias and heterogeneity, renders it unwise to make definite conclusions about the benefits of integrating biologics with ARP materials. This narrative review found possible benefits in the use of biologics in ARP to optimise patient-related and treatment outcomes, indicating the need for additional research. Full article
15 pages, 1881 KB  
Article
The Efficacy of a Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Histologic Study in Humans
by Arturo Sánchez-Pérez, Marcos Rodríguez-Sánchez, Carlos Manuel Martínez-Cáceres, Alfonso Jornet-García and María José Moya-Villaescusa
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061358 - 31 May 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2423
Abstract
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following tooth extraction plays a vital role in maintaining ridge dimensions and supporting subsequent implant therapy. Objectives: This study histologically and radiographically evaluates the efficacy of techBiomat bone®—a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM)—for alveolar ridge preservation [...] Read more.
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following tooth extraction plays a vital role in maintaining ridge dimensions and supporting subsequent implant therapy. Objectives: This study histologically and radiographically evaluates the efficacy of techBiomat bone®—a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM)—for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), comparing the results of bone formation, residual graft particles, and nonmineralized tissue to those of spontaneous healing in human tooth sockets. Methods: A split-mouth study was conducted to evaluate the radiographic and histologic outcomes in human sockets with and without ARP. Results: A significant improvement in bone fill was observed compared to untreated sockets. Radiographically, 87% of the treated sockets demonstrated more than 75% bone fill, whereas only 7% of the untreated sockets did. Histologically, the percentage of new bone formation was greater in treated sockets (42%) than in untreated sockets (25%). The findings also highlighted a lower proportion of nonmineralized tissue in grafted sites, suggesting improved healing over spontaneous healing. The residual graft material in the treated sockets had a moderate resorption rate, with almost complete replacement by the host bone after six months. The use of techBiomat bone® demonstrated promising results, with a resorption rate conducive to optimal bone regeneration, with less than 9% residual graft material remaining after six months. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy of techBiomat bone® graft material for ARP, highlighting its potential in maintaining ridge volume. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wound Healing: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4091 KB  
Case Report
New Technique of Double-Layer Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Matrix on Periodontally Collapsed Extraction Region: Proof-of-Concept Case Study
by Yu-Jin Kim and Jong-Bin Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3617; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113617 - 22 May 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4349
Abstract
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is widely used in clinical practice to prevent horizontal and vertical bone loss following tooth extraction. Conventional ARP uses a single coverage material with bone graft materials on a simple tooth extraction site. The objective of this study [...] Read more.
Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is widely used in clinical practice to prevent horizontal and vertical bone loss following tooth extraction. Conventional ARP uses a single coverage material with bone graft materials on a simple tooth extraction site. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a new double-layer ARP technique that additionally covers a collagen matrix at the top position, especially on the periodontally collapsed region following tooth extraction. Methods: In a clinical study process comparing our newly attempted ARP with the widely used conventional ARP, we discovered the clinical efficacy of our new ARP for specially selected cases. Because the extraction socket wall had collapsed and the entire ridge needed to be reconstructed, this procedure should be described as alveolar ridge augmentation. Results: Additional coverage of the collagen matrix protected the internal bone grafting and promoted external soft tissue regeneration and healing in sample cases. Conclusions: In conclusion, our procedure promotes the new generation of hard and soft tissues. It is particularly effective in regions requiring flapped surgery, such as areas with periodontal disease, long-span areas requiring multiple tooth extractions, and areas in which there is wide destruction of hard and soft tissues. Through this proof-of-concept case study, we aimed to standardize and evaluate this unprecedented surgical technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1076 KB  
Systematic Review
The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review of Its Biological and Regenerative Potential According to PRISMA Guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook
by Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Simona Santonocito, Roberta Giudice, Salvatore Bocchieri, Simone Didomenico and Marco Cicciù
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020451 - 12 Feb 2025
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4211
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the biological activity and regenerative potential of hyaluronic acid (HA) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following tooth extraction, assessing its efficacy in reducing bone resorption and promoting bone regeneration when combined with xenografts. Methods: A comprehensive [...] Read more.
Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the biological activity and regenerative potential of hyaluronic acid (HA) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following tooth extraction, assessing its efficacy in reducing bone resorption and promoting bone regeneration when combined with xenografts. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Studies from 2012 to December 2024 involving human participants were included based on a PECO framework. Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with data extracted and analyzed for clinical and histological outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. Results: The included studies demonstrated that HA combined with xenografts significantly reduced post-extraction bone resorption compared to controls. HA-enhanced grafts showed superior radiographic and histological outcomes, including increased bone density and reduced graft shrinkage. While one randomized controlled trial found no significant differences in wound healing or patient-reported outcomes between HA and control groups, other studies reported improved bone formation and graft stability with HA. Variability in study design and sample size was noted, with a generally moderate to high risk of bias in some studies. Conclusions: The evidence supports the beneficial role of HA as an adjuvant in ARP procedures, enhancing bone regeneration and limiting resorption. However, further research with larger samples and standardized methodologies is required to confirm these findings and optimize clinical protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Oral Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1398 KB  
Review
Advancements in Hyaluronic Acid Effect in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Narrative Review
by Paul Andrei Nistor, Andreea Cândea, Iulia Cristina Micu, Andrada Soancă, Carmen Silvia Caloian, Alina Bârdea and Alexandra Roman
Diagnostics 2025, 15(2), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020137 - 8 Jan 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5898
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Tooth extraction induces significant alveolar ridge dimensional changes and soft tissue modifications, often leading to challenges in implant placement or conventional prosthetic rehabilitation. Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) strategies aim to mitigate post-extraction resorption of the alveolar ridge, enhancing both the quality [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Tooth extraction induces significant alveolar ridge dimensional changes and soft tissue modifications, often leading to challenges in implant placement or conventional prosthetic rehabilitation. Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) strategies aim to mitigate post-extraction resorption of the alveolar ridge, enhancing both the quality and quantity of bone and soft tissue during healing. Hyaluronic acid (HYA) has emerged as a promising biological agent for ARP due to its osteoinductive, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the effects of HYA in ARP remain inconsistently reported. This study aims to assess current clinical and preclinical evidence regarding the biological effects of HYA and its application in ARP. Additionally, it evaluates HYA’s impact—alone or in combination with other products—on hard and soft tissue dimensional changes, early wound healing, and implant success rates. Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted, and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically evaluated. Relevant data were extracted from the final selection of articles. Results: Thirteen publications were evaluated. Some studies reported a significantly improved newly formed bone following ARP with intra-socket HYA application as a single approach (p = 0.004). Combining HYA with a bone graft and a free palatal graft resulted in significantly greater amounts of newly formed and mature bone, reduced clinical bone width changes, lower radiographic crestal bone loss (p < 0.01), and diminished radiological volumetric and linear bone resorption (p = 0.018). Short-term follow-up data indicated improved soft tissue healing associated with HYA-based ARP. While HYA appears to have a protective effect on ridge dimensional changes in ARP, other studies reported no significant differences in radiographic bone dimensional changes or soft tissue improvement. Conclusions: The addition of HYA to bone grafts may enhance some ARP outcomes. However, the variability in outcomes and methodologies across the evaluated studies precludes drawing definitive clinical conclusions. Further robust research is needed to clarify HYA’s role in ARP. With respect to clinical significance enhancing the understanding of ARP management strategies and their effects on post-extraction sockets empowers clinicians to make more informed decisions. The knowledge of HYA effects facilitates the selection of personalized ARP approaches tailored to optimize outcomes for subsequent interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 13344 KB  
Article
Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.): A Retrospective Clinical Study on 105 Implants with a 3–7-Year Follow-Up
by Márton Kivovics, Vincenzo Foti, Yaniv Mayer and Eitan Mijiritsky
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226916 - 17 Nov 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3934
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The primary aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the success and bone gain achieved by using the Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.) in different indications. Methods: In this single-center retrospective clinical study, F.I.R.S.T. was performed in the following indications: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The primary aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the success and bone gain achieved by using the Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.) in different indications. Methods: In this single-center retrospective clinical study, F.I.R.S.T. was performed in the following indications: alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), immediate implant placement, and horizontal and vertical guided bone regeneration (GBR) with simultaneous dental implant placement. F.I.R.S.T. is a modified approach to GBR characterized by the application of a porcine cortical lamina, as a long-term resorbable bone barrier to cover the bone defect, and a fibrin sealant for easy adaptation of the xenogenic bone graft material and the fixation of the collagenic bone barrier. Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases, medications, or diseases that may alter bone metabolism; local inflammation; poor oral hygiene; and heavy smoking were excluded from this study. Horizontal and vertical bone gain (HBG and VBG) were measured by comparing postoperative and preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructions. Patients were recalled for controls and oral hygiene treatment every 6 months. Results: Altogether, 62 patients (27 male, 35 female, age 63.73 ± 12.95 years) were included in this study, and 105 implants were placed. Six implants failed during the 50.67 ± 22.18-month-long follow-up. Cumulative implant survival throughout the groups was 94.29 %. In the immediate implant group, HBG was 0.86 mm (range: −0.75–8.19 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level, while VBG was 0.87 ± 1.21 mm. In the ARP group, HBG was 0.51 mm (range: −0.29–3.90 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level, while VBG was −0.16 mm (range: −0.52–0.92 mm). In the horizontal GBR group, HBG was 2.91 mm (range: 1.24–8.10 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level. In the vertical GBR group, VBG was 4.15 mm (range: 3.00–10.41 mm). Conclusions: F.I.R.S.T. can be utilized successfully for bone augmentation. The vertical and horizontal bone gains achieved through F.I.R.S.T. allow for implant placement with adequate bone width on both the vestibular and oral aspects of the implant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Implant Surgery: Clinical Updates and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop