Search Results (118)

Background: Dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) was introduced to reduce postoperative instability, one of the most frequent causes of revision after hip replacement. Its use has progressively expanded beyond revision surgery to selected high-risk primary cases; however, comparative data integrating both clinical and radiographic outcomes from real-world tertiary centers remain limited. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted including 78 patients who underwent THA with a DM acetabular component between January 2019 and December 2024, and 78 matched controls who received conventional fixed-bearing THA during the same period. Matching criteria were age, sex, and procedure type (primary versus revision). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Radiographic evaluation focused on component positioning, radiolucent lines, and signs of loosening. Complications and revision rates were compared between groups. Results: The mean age was 71 ± 9 years, and 62% of patients were female. Mean follow-up was 38 months. HHS improved from 54 ± 10 preoperatively to 89 ± 8 postoperatively in the DM group (p < 0.001), with similar final functional outcomes in the conventional THA group (90 ± 9, p = 0.48), and comparable improvement between groups (p = 0.62). Radiographic parameters demonstrated stable fixation and appropriate component positioning in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences. The dislocation rate was numerically lower in the DM group (1.3% vs. 5.1%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.37). No cases of intraprosthetic dislocation occurred. Overall implant survival free from revision at five years was 96.5% for DM and 94.7% for conventional THA (p = 0.47). Conclusions: DM THA achieved excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, with a numerically lower dislocation rate than conventional THA. Mid-term implant survivorship was comparable between groups, supporting DM as a reliable option for improving stability in appropriately selected patients. Full article

Background/Objective: Traditional hip implant evaluations often overlook patient-specific dynamic loadings. This study investigates the performance of novel collared hip implant designs under walking conditions, focusing on geometric profiles and two common stem materials: Ti-6Al-4V and CoCr alloy. Methods: Patient-specific dynamic forces were applied using commercial finite element analysis, adhering to ISO and ASTM standards. Four cross-sectional profiles—circular, elliptical, oval, and trapezoidal—were initially evaluated for induced stresses and displacements. Subsequently, wear characteristics at implant junctions were analyzed, comparing CoCr (MC 1) and Ti-6Al-4V (MC 2) stems. The study also assessed the impact of using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cups. Results: The elliptical (CS 2) cross-sectional profile demonstrated superior performance. Junction analysis revealed that the CoCr stem (MC 1) exhibited a stem-to-head sliding distance four times higher and contact pressure 5.5 times higher than the Ti-6Al-4V stem (MC 2). Specifically, MC 1 showed 82% higher contact pressure and 89% greater sliding distance at the stem–head junction compared to MC 2. Additionally, utilizing UHMWPE cups effectively eliminated squeaking sounds attributed to CoCr cups due to superior wear resistance. Conclusions: The combination of an elliptical (CS 2) cross-sectional profile with a Ti-6Al-4V stem and UHMWPE acetabular cup offers optimal performance. This configuration significantly reduces wear and contact pressure, suggesting enhanced functionality and durability for hip implants under dynamic loading conditions. Full article

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among orthopaedic surgeons are associated with sustained, constrained postures during demanding intraoperative tasks. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) comprises sequential steps that may impose different postural loads on both the surgeon and assistant, yet team-level ergonomic design interventions remain underexplored. This study compared ergonomic risk during primary THA performed through the direct lateral (modified Hardinge) and posterolateral (Moore) approaches and assessed a simple workflow redesign: swapping surgeon and assistant positions during acetabular cup preparation (bottom reaming, perimeter reaming, and cup impaction). In a controlled Sawbones-based simulation using standard THA instruments, eight standardised surgical steps were recorded with 360° photographs. Forty-two postural instances (22 for the surgeon, 20 for the assistant) were analysed. Joint angles were measured with Kinovea and converted to Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scores; intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC95) were calculated. Surgeon REBA scores were in the medium-risk range and slightly lower with the posterolateral approach (mean 5.5) than with the direct lateral approach (mean 5.88), whereas assistant scores were in the low-risk range (means 3.43 and 3.29, respectively). The position-swap intervention successfully lowered the surgeon’s REBA action level, most notably during cup impaction, where ergonomic risk dropped from 10 (high risk) to 4 (medium risk) in the posterolateral approach, and from 7 (medium risk) to 3 (low risk) in the direct lateral approach, without increasing assistant risk. These findings provide controlled simulation-based evidence that this simple, zero-cost positional change can reduce the surgeon’s ergonomic action level during THA, although confirmation under real operative conditions is needed before broad generalization. Full article

Introduction: Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers excellent wear characteristics but carries risks such as liner malseating and ceramic fracture. To solve these problems, monoblock acetabular cups with preassembled ceramic liners were developed to minimize technical errors and allow the use of larger femoral heads. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of a ceramic monoblock acetabular cup system. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 primary THAs in South Korean patients using the Maxera monoblock cup (Zimmer Biomet) between 2015 and 2018, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Radiologic evaluation included osteolysis and radiolucent lines. Normality of clinical variables was confirmed, and pre-to-postoperative comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Results: The mean follow-up was 6.8 ± 1.4 years. The most common preoperative diagnosis was avascular necrosis (66.0%). Cups sized ≤52 mm were used in 80.2% of hips, allowing the frequent use of large femoral heads (32–40 mm). Clinical scores improved significantly: HHS from 37.0 ± 13.4 to 90.8 ± 6.2, WOMAC from 66.6 ± 11.5 to 7.6 ± 6.7, and VAS from 6.45 ± 1.1 to 1.1 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001). No osteolysis was observed. Radiolucent lines was appeared in four hips (3.7%) without evidence of migration or loosening. One cup fixation failure (0.9%) required revision. No cases of ceramic fracture, squeaking, or dislocation occurred. Conclusions: The ceramic monoblock acetabular cup demonstrated excellent mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes with a very low complication rate. The ability to reliably use large femoral heads likely contributed to enhanced joint stability. However, the absence of screw fixation and inability to directly visualize cup insertion require careful attention during cup impaction. Long-term studies with comparative cohorts are warranted. Full article

Purpose: Revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) in the presence of a well-fixed femoral stem is associated with increased risk, as stem removal often results in bone loss, prolonged operative time, and greater blood loss. This problem is particularly relevant for older implants with a 14/16 taper, which is incompatible with most modern femoral heads. The Bioball™ System, a modular head–neck adapter, allows for acetabular or head-only revision while preserving the femoral stem. This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of RTHA using the Bioball™ System in patients with 14/16 tapers. Methods: A total of 38 patients (23 women, 15 men; mean age 73.5 years) met the inclusion criteria. All procedures were carried out with a well-fixed femoral stem and a 14/16 taper. Revisions were limited to exchange of the acetabular component, liner, or both, avoiding stem removal. The primary indication was acetabular cup loosening (n = 29, 76.3%); liner-only exchange was performed in 9 patients (23.7%). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel (MAP) score, and radiological evaluation focused on fixation, migration, and loosening. Mean follow-up was 8.44 years. Results: Both the acetabular component and liner were replaced in 76.3% of patients, while 23.7% underwent liner and head exchange only. Longer adapter sizes were most frequently used, and a 7.5° offset adapter was applied in 57.9% of cases. The modified MAP score improved by a mean of 5.7 points (p < 0.05), and VAS pain scores decreased from 7.4 to 2.6 (p < 0.05). No radiological signs of loosening were observed at final follow-up. Conclusions: The Bioball™ System enables effective restoration of hip stability and offset without femoral stem removal, offering favorable long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in revisions involving older 14/16 tapers. Full article

Background: This propensity-score-matched retrospective study compared radiographic accuracy and short-term functional outcomes between MAKO robotic-arm-assisted and conventional dual-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA). It was hypothesized that robotic assistance would provide superior radiographic accuracy, primarily smaller absolute deviations from the planned acetabular inclination and anteversion and a higher proportion of cups within the Lewinnek safe zone, without improving early functional outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent dual-incision total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed at two affiliated institutions between March 2023 and March 2025. The study included 52 robotic-arm-assisted cases. The dual-incision technique used an anterolateral incision for acetabular preparation and cup implantation and a posterolateral incision for femoral preparation and stem implantation. Propensity score matching (1:1) generated 52 balanced pairs for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), ASA class, and diagnosis. Operative time, blood loss, radiographic accuracy (acetabular anteversion, inclination, leg-length discrepancy [LLD], femoral and combined offsets, and stem subsidence), and functional outcomes (HHS, Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Forgotten Joint Score-12 [FJS-12]) were compared. Results: The robotic group achieved smaller deviations from the planned anteversion (1.15° vs. 3.0°, p < 0.001) and inclination (1.33° vs. 4.5°, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of cups within the Lewinnek safe zone (98.1% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.016). Significant improvements were also seen in femoral stem subsidence (p = 0.006) and offset restoration, although the reduction in leg-length discrepancy did not reach statistical significance. Operative time was longer (77.8 vs. 65.0 min, p = 0.001), while blood loss and 6-month functional scores were comparable (HHS, p = 0.144; OHS, p = 0.328). Multivariable regression confirmed that greater deviations in acetabular orientation, higher LLD, and increased subsidence were independent predictors of poorer functional outcomes. Conclusions: MAKO robotic-arm assistance was associated with improved radiographic accuracy and biomechanical restoration in dual-incision THA, but no direct short-term functional advantage was observed. Greater radiographic precision was independently associated with better patient-reported outcomes, suggesting that technical precision is a key factor in optimizing early postoperative outcomes, highlighting the importance of technical accuracy in total hip arthroplasty. Full article

Background: Preoperative templating is an essential step in hip arthroplasty (HA), guiding implant selection and reducing surgical complications. It is typically performed using acetate templates or digital software. These methods, however, depend on the surgeon’s experience and may be limited by cost and availability. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model using plain radiographs to predict implant sizes in HA. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary HA using a cementless CORAIL^® femoral stem and PINNACLE^® acetabular cup. The DL model was trained on 688 preoperative anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs and validated temporally on 98 additional cases. Implant sizes predicted by the DL model were compared with on-screen templating (acetate templates overlaid on digital images). The actual implanted size was used as the reference standard. Accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were calculated. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors influencing prediction accuracy. Results: The DL model showed higher accuracy than the on-screen templating for the acetabular cup (88.9% [77.4% to 95.8%] vs. 83.3% [70.7% to 90.2%]) and femoral stem components (85.7% [77.2% to 92.0%] vs. 81.6% [72.5% to 88.7%]), while the on-screen method performed better for the bipolar head (93.2% [81.3% to 98.6%] vs. 72.7% [57.2% to 85.0%]). MAE and RMSE were comparable between the methods for acetabular and femoral stem components (all p > 0.05), with statistically significant differences observed only in the bipolar head (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Although logistic regression analysis showed trends toward higher accuracy in acetabular size prediction among women and those with shorter height, no demographic factors were statistically significant predictors of accuracy. Conclusions: A DL model using only plain radiographs can accurately predict implant sizes in HA, particularly for the acetabulum and femoral stem. These findings suggest that the DL-based model could be a useful tool in preoperative planning. With further refinement to improve generalizability, this approach could be useful in a routine clinical setting in the future. Full article

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage hip joint disease. Two-dimensional (2D) templating represents the most widely used method for preoperative planning in clinical practice. Patient characteristics and comorbidities may further influence and complicate radiographic templating. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of comorbidities in influencing the accuracy of 2D digital preoperative planning in primary cementless THA. Methods: In this prospective observational study, all patients underwent standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, and a digital templating was performed using digital software. Patient demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities, were extracted and all the patients were divided into matched and mismatched group for the femoral stem, femoral head, and acetabular cup. Results: The final sample consisted of 71 patients with 44 (62%) female and 27 (38%) male patients, averaging 69.8 ± 10.6 years at surgery. For the femoral stem, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups according to comorbidities. For the femoral head, 12.5% and 50% of the patients had osteoporosis in the matched group and mismatched group, respectively (p-value = 0.002). For the acetabular cup, 18.4% and 40.9% of the patients had osteoporosis in the matched and mismatched groups, respectively (p-value = 0.043). Conclusions: Two-dimensional digital templating is a reliable technique for preoperative planning in primary cementless THA. Osteoporosis significantly influences templating accuracy, often resulting in component oversizing. Full article

Background/Objectives: Modular dual mobility (MDM) cups are constituted by a cobalt-chromium liner inserted into a standard acetabular shell, allowing for intraoperative indication and supplementary screw fixation of the acetabular component. MDM could face mechanical and biological issues, with the associated risk of elevated blood metal ions levels and adverse local tissue reactions. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study on a consecutive series of 105 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA with the G7 Dual Mobility Acetabular System cup (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) from March 2019 to April 2023, and who were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a minimum two-year follow-up. All complications and revisions were recorded. Survivorship analysis with any revision surgery as endpoint was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Results: There were eighty-nine patients (follow-up rate 84.8%) who underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up. The mean follow-up was 2.5 ± 0.8 years. Revision-free survival was 98.0%. Three complications (2.8%) were recorded: one case of posterior dislocation, one periprosthetic joint infection and one post-traumatic periprosthetic femur fracture. Dislocation rate and infection rate were less than 1.0%. None of the patients were revised for adverse local tissue reactions. No cup loosening was observed. No cases of intraprosthetic dislocation, liner malseating or femoral notching were observed. Retroacetabular stress shielding was present in 43.0% of patients. Clinical scores significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with preoperative status (p < 0.0001): the final mean mHHS was 87.5 ± 5.3 and the final mean VAS was 0.5 ± 0.9. Conclusions: The Zimmer G7 modular dual mobility cup appears to be a safe and effective option and does not present specific implant-related mechanical and biological issues in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up. Full article

Background/Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely accepted and effective intervention for advanced degenerative hip disease. However, prosthetic dislocation remains one of the most common postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical consequences of implant positioning variations and their influence on prosthetic stability. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) of the pelvis and hip joint was developed using SolidWorks Professional 2025, based on CT imaging of an anatomically normal adult. Multiple implant configurations were simulated, varying acetabular cup inclination and anteversion angles, femoral stem depth, and femoral offset. Muscle force vectors replicating single-leg stance conditions were applied according to biomechanical reference data. The mechanical performance of each configuration was quantified using the safety factor (SF), defined as the ratio of allowable material stress to calculated stress in the model. Results: The configuration with 45° cup inclination, 15° anteversion, standard femoral offset, and optimal stem depth demonstrated the highest SF values (9–12), indicating a low risk of mechanical failure or dislocation. In contrast, malpositioned implants—particularly those with low or high anteversion, excessive offset, or shallow stem insertion—resulted in a marked decrease in SF values (2–5), especially in the anterosuperior and posterosuperior quadrants of the acetabular interface. Conclusions: The findings underscore the critical importance of precise implant alignment in THA. Even moderate deviations from optimal positioning can substantially compromise biomechanical stability and increase the risk of dislocation. These results support the need for individualized preoperative planning and the use of assistive technologies during surgery to enhance implant placement accuracy and improve clinical outcomes. Full article

Background: Long-term survivorship in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is influenced by implant stability and stress distribution to surrounding bone. Isoelastic acetabular components are monoblock polyethylene cups with a low elastic modulus, which were developed to reduce stress shielding and enhance periacetabular bone preservation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes, wear rate, and survivorship of isoelastic cups in primary THA with a minimum follow-up of five years. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed in April 2025 across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria comprised clinical studies on isoelastic acetabular cups in primary THA with a minimum of five years of follow-up. Data on survivorship, complications, clinical outcomes, wear, and radiological performance were extracted and analyzed. Risk of bias in each study was assessed through the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: Twelve studies, encompassing 1491 hips, met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years. Overall implant survival rate ranged from 82.7% to 100%. Mean Harris Hip Score was 92.6, with low reported pain and high satisfaction. Mean annual wear was 0.05 mm/year. Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEHXLPE) cups demonstrated lower femoral head penetration compared to UHMWPE. A randomized trial showed reduced bone loss in the polar region with isoelastic cups versus modular titanium cups (4.9% versus 15.9%, p = 0.005). Complication and revision rates were low, though heterogeneity in cup positioning reporting and variable follow-up durations were noted. Conclusions: Isoelastic acetabular components demonstrate excellent survivorship, low wear rates, and favorable clinical outcomes at mid- to long-term follow-up. High-quality, long-term comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings across broader patient populations. Full article

Background: Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) is an increasingly recognized cause of persistent groin pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA), often resulting from mechanical conflict between the iliopsoas tendon and the anterior rim of the acetabular component. Despite its clinical relevance, risk factors contributing to IPI remain poorly defined. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if they evaluated adult patients undergoing primary THA and reported at least one risk factor associated with IPI. Only studies with a clearly defined clinical diagnosis of IPI were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias in each study was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twelve observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Diagnosis of IPI was based on clinical symptoms of anterior groin pain exacerbated by hip flexion; 9 studies confirmed diagnosis with anesthetic injections. Key surgical risk factors included anterior cup prominence (ORs 1.16–35.20), oversized cups (cup-to-head ratio > 1.2, OR = 5.39, or ≥6 mm difference, OR = 26.00), decreased cup inclination, collared stem protrusion (OR = 13.89), and acetabular screw protrusion > 6.4 mm. Patient-specific risk factors included female sex (ORs 2.56, 2.79), higher BMI (OR = 1.07), younger age, previous hip arthroscopy (OR = 9.60) and spinal fusion (OR = 4.60). The anterolateral approach was also associated with higher IPI risk when compared to the posterior approach (OR = 4.20). Conclusions: IPI after THA is a multifactorial complication influenced by modifiable surgical variables and patient-specific anatomy. Careful preoperative planning, precise implant positioning, and attention to individual risk factors are essential to reduce IPI incidence and improve outcomes. Full article

Introduction: Instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenging complication. Dual-mobility (DM) hip components are aimed at improving joint stability by increasing the head-neck ratio and jump distance. However, data regarding the efficacy of these implants in the trauma setting are scarce. This study aimed to compare the dislocation rates of DM bearings with conventional THA in patients undergoing primary THA for the treatment of hip fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent THA for hip fractures between the years 2010–2022 and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient demographics and radiographic parameters, including cup version, leg length discrepancy (LLD) and femoral horizontal offset, were compared between patients who received DM bearings and patients who received conventional THA. Dislocation and revision surgery rates were also compared between the groups. Results: The study included 570 patients who met inclusion criteria, of which 82 patients were in the DM bearings group and 488 patients were in the conventional THA group. Baseline demographics and comorbidity profiles were comparable between the groups. Cup anteversion was significantly lower in the DM group (11.1° vs. 14.1°; p = 0.006), while no significant differences were observed in LLD nor femoral offset between the groups (p = 0.38, p = 0.69, respectively). Dislocation rates were similar between the DM and conventional THA groups (1.2% vs. 1.02%, respectively; p = 0.54). Furthermore, revision rates were similar between DM and conventional THA (1.22% vs. 2.87%, respectively; p = 0.387). Conclusions: While no significant differences in dislocation rates were observed between dual-mobility and conventional THA bearings, the significantly lower cup anteversion suggests a potential improvement in acetabular safe zone positioning, this could reflect a broader margin for error in implant positioning. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the biomechanical advantages of DM bearings in patients with hip fractures. Full article

Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) following pelvic osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is technically challenging due to altered acetabular morphology. This study aimed to compare radiographic cup position and perioperative characteristics of THA after three common pelvic osteotomies—periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), shelf procedure, and Chiari osteotomy—with primary THA in Crowe type I DDH. Methods: A retrospective review identified 25 hips that underwent conversion THA after pelvic osteotomy (PAO = 12, shelf = 8, Chiari = 5) and 25 primary THAs without prior osteotomy. One-to-one matching was performed based on sex (exact match), age (within 5 years), and BMI (within 2 kg/m²) without the use of propensity scores. Cup inclination, radiographic anteversion, center-edge (CE) angle, and cup height were measured on standardized anteroposterior radiographs (ICC = 0.91). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and use of bulk bone grafts or reinforcement rings were reviewed. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test and chi-square test were used for statistical comparison. Results: Cup inclination, anteversion, and CE angle did not differ significantly among groups. Cup height was significantly greater in the PAO group than in controls (29.0 mm vs. 21.8 mm; p = 0.0075), indicating a more proximal hip center. The Chiari and shelf groups showed upward trends, though not significant. Mean operative time tended to be longer after PAO (123 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.078). Bulk bone grafts and reinforcement rings were more frequently required in the PAO group (17%; p = 0.036 vs. control), and occasionally in Chiari cases, but not in shelf or control groups. Conclusions: THA after PAO is associated with higher cup placement and greater need for reconstructive devices, indicating increased technical complexity. In contrast, shelf and Chiari conversions more closely resemble primary THA. Preoperative planning should consider hip center translation and bone-stock restoration in post-osteotomy THA. Full article

Background: The increasing incidence of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs), particularly due to failure of the acetabular components and severe bone loss, necessitates reliable surgical solutions. Iliac stemmed cups (ISCs) have emerged as effective options for managing complex pelvic defects, including Paprosky type 3A and 3B acetabular defects, severe developmental dysplasia, and selected pelvic discontinuities. This review examines the historical evolution, clinical indications, and outcomes associated with ISCs. Methods: This narrative review analyzed the historical and recent literature concerning various ISC designs. We critically assessed clinical outcomes, complication rates, and implant survival from 13 key studies. Results: ISCs have progressed significantly from initial monobloc designs to contemporary modular configurations, substantially enhancing surgical versatility and biomechanical stability. Clinical outcomes varied with reported complications such as infection, dislocation, mechanical failure, and aseptic loosening ranging from 10% to over 30%. Newer modular implants like the Sansone cup have demonstrated improved outcomes, with complication rates below 10% and five-year survival rates exceeding 95%. Conclusions: ISCs are reliable and versatile implants, particularly suited to address significant pelvic bone deficiencies. Optimal surgical techniques and careful implant selection remain essential to minimize complications and achieve favorable long-term functional outcomes, making these implants valuable tools in complex hip arthroplasty. Full article