Search Results (18,143)

Breast milk can provide passive immunity to infants, serving as a valuable source of maternal antibodies while remaining a non-invasive sample for investigating maternal immune responses. To date, no studies have evaluated SARS-CoV-2 and potentially cross-reactive HCoV antibodies in breast milk following bamlanivimab administration. A 36-year-old postpartum female was PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2 four days post-delivery. Bamlanivimab was administered intravenously two days later. Breast milk was collected before bamlanivimab infusion, daily for two weeks post-infusion, then weekly until 102 days post-infusion. Mother and infant sera were collected only at 102 days post-infusion. All milk and serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV. We observed two distinct SARS-CoV-2 antibody peaks at days 3 and 29 post-infusion, likely representing bamlanivimab transfer and the post-infection antibody response. Beta-HCoV antibodies showed two peaks at days 6 and 29, potentially representing backboosted beta-HCoV responses and/or antibody cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV-2. Infant seropositivity for SARS-CoV-2 102 days post-infusion may represent antibodies from passive transfer via breastfeeding or a subclinical infection. This case highlights the value of breast milk as a non-invasive and repeatable sample to help understand maternal immune responses post-infection, exogenous antibody infusion, and passive antibody transfer during breastfeeding, which can provide insights into maternal–infant health research. Full article

Schizophrenia is a challenging multifactorial neuropsychiatric disease that involves interactions between genetic susceptibility and environmental insults. Increasing evidence implicates viral infections as significant environmental contributors, particularly during sensitive neurodevelopmental periods. This review synthesises current findings on the viral hypothesis of schizophrenia, encompassing a wide array of neurotropic viruses, including influenza viruses, herpesviruses (HSV-1 and 2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6 and 8), hepatitis B and C viruses, HIV, HERVs, HTLV, Zika virus, BoDV, coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), and others. These pathogens can contribute to schizophrenia through mechanisms such as direct microinvasion, persistent central nervous system infection, immune-mediated neuroinflammation, molecular mimicry, and the disturbance of the blood–brain barrier. Prenatal exposure to viral infections can trigger maternal immune activation, resulting in cytokine-mediated alterations in the neurological development of the foetus that persist into adulthood. Genetic studies highlight the role of immune-related loci, including major histocompatibility complex polymorphisms, in modulating susceptibility to infection and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Clinical data also support the “mild encephalitis” hypothesis, suggesting that a subset of schizophrenia cases involve low-grade chronic neuroinflammation. Although antipsychotics have some immunomodulatory effects, adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapies show promise, particularly in treatment-resistant cases. Despite compelling associations, pathogen-specific links remain inconsistent, emphasising the need for longitudinal studies and integrative approaches such as viromics to unravel causal relationships. This review supports a “multi-hit” model in which viral infections interfere with hereditary and immunological susceptibilities, enhancing schizophrenia risk. Elucidating these virus–immune–brain interactions may facilitate the discovery of biomarkers, targeted prevention, and novel therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia. Full article

The focal “hot spot” neuropathologies in COVID-19 infection are revealing footprints of a hidden underlying collapse of a novel ultrafast ultradian Piezo2 signaling system within the nervous system. Paradoxically, the same initiating pathophysiology may underpin the systemic findings in COVID-19 infection, namely the multiorgan SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced vascular pathologies and brain–body-wide systemic pro-inflammatory signaling, depending on the concentration and exposure to infecting SARS-CoV-2 viruses. This common initiating microdamage is suggested to be the primary damage or the acquired channelopathy of the Piezo2 ion channel, leading to a principal gateway to pathophysiology. This Piezo2 channelopathy-induced neural switch could not only explain the initiation of disrupted cell–cell interactions, metabolic failure, microglial dysfunction, mitochondrial injury, glutamatergic synapse loss, inflammation and neurological states with the central involvement of the hippocampus and the medulla, but also the initiating pathophysiology without SARS-CoV-2 viral intracellular entry into neurons as well. Therefore, the impairment of the proposed Piezo2-induced quantum mechanical free-energy-stimulated ultrafast proton-coupled tunneling seems to be the principal and critical underlying COVID-19 infection-induced primary damage along the brain axes, depending on the loci of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and intracellular entry. Moreover, this initiating Piezo2 channelopathy may also explain resultant autonomic dysregulation involving the medulla, hippocampus and heart rate regulation, not to mention sleep disturbance with altered rapid eye movement sleep and cognitive deficit in the short term, and even as a consequence of long COVID. The current opinion piece aims to promote future angles of science and research in order to further elucidate the not entirely known initiating pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article

Background: COVID-19 is associated with coagulopathy and increased mortality. The ABO blood group system has been implicated in modulating susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity, but its relationship with viral RNAemia, spike gene mutations, and thrombosis remains underexplored. Methods: We analyzed 446 hospitalized COVID-19 patients between 2021 and 2022. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was assessed via RT-qPCR on whole blood, and spike gene mutations were identified through whole-genome sequencing in RNAemia-positive samples. ABO blood groups were determined by agglutination testing, and thrombotic events were evaluated using coagulation markers. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and Kruskal–Wallis tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: RNAemia was detected in 26.9% of patients, with no significant association with ABO blood group (p = 0.175). Omicron was the predominant variant, especially in blood group A (62.5%). The N501Y mutation was the most prevalent in group O (53.2%), and K417N was most prevalent in group B (36.9%), though neither reached statistical significance. Thrombotic events were significantly more common in blood group A (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.3–3.4, p = 0.002), particularly among RNAemia-positive patients. Conclusions: ABO blood group phenotypes, particularly group A, may influence thrombotic risk in the context of SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia. While no direct association was found between blood group and RNAemia or spike mutations, the observed trends suggest potential host–pathogen interactions. Integrating ABO typing and RNAemia screening may enhance risk stratification and guide targeted thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 patients. Full article

Introduction: Long COVID syndrome is defined as persistent or new symptoms that appear after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and last at least three months without explanation. It is estimated that between 10% and 20% of those infected develop long COVID; however, data is not precise in Latin America. Although high immunization rates have reduced acute symptoms and the pandemic’s impact, there is a lack of evidence of its efficacy in preventing long COVID in the region. Methods: This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies on vaccinated adults with long COVID from Central and South America and the Caribbean were included (Mexico was also considered). A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted. Data included study design, participant characteristics, vaccine type, and efficacy outcomes. Results are presented narratively and in tables. Results: Out of 3466 initial records, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria after rigorous selection processes. These studies encompassed populations from Brazil, Mexico, Latin America, and Bonaire, with 11,333 participants, 69.3% of whom were female. Vaccination, particularly with three or more doses, substantially reduces the risk and duration of long COVID. Variability was noted in the definitions and outcomes assessed across studies. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination exhibits potential in reducing the burden of long COVID in the Americas. However, discrepancies in vaccine efficacy were observed depending on the study design, the population studied, and the vaccine regimen employed. Further robust, region-specific investigations are warranted to delineate the effects of vaccination on long COVID outcomes. Full article

The development of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is characterized by extensive lung inflammation, which, in turn, leads to respiratory distress and a decline in blood oxygen levels. Hospital admission, along with intensive care or ventilator usage, becomes necessary because this condition leads to serious respiratory problems. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and current therapeutic options for pneumonia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The pathophysiological process of severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by direct lung damage from viral replication, an excessive immune system response, inflammation, impaired gas exchange, and multi-organ failure. The coexistence of various medical conditions leads to substantial lung impairment, resulting in hypoxia and respiratory failure, which can ultimately lead to fatal outcomes. The diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is made through a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings. A multifaceted approach integrating antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, oxygen supplementation, ventilatory management, and immunomodulation is imperative to control inflammation and enhance clinical outcomes. Early intervention, meticulous monitoring, and personalized care are paramount for enhancing survival and mitigating complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Full article

Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic human RNA viruses from probable zoonotic origin have highlighted the relevance of epidemic preparedness as a society. However, research in vaccinology and virology, as well as epidemiologic surveillance, is often constrained by the biological risk that live virus experimentation entails. These also involve expensive costs, time-consuming procedures, and advanced personnel expertise, hampering market access for many drugs. Most of these drawbacks can be circumvented with the use of pseudotyped viruses, which are surrogate, non-pathogenic recombinant viral particles bearing the surface envelope protein of a virus of interest. Pseudotyped viruses significantly expand the research potential in virology, enabling the study of non-culturable or highly infectious pathogens in a safer environment. Most are derived from lentiviral vectors, which confer a series of advantages due to their superior efficiency. During the past decade, many studies employing pseudotyped viruses have evaluated the efficacy of vaccines or monoclonal antibodies for relevant pathogens such as HIV-1, Ebolavirus, Influenza virus, or SARS-CoV-2. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the applications of pseudotyped viruses when evaluating the neutralization capacity of exposed individuals, or candidate vaccines and antivirals in both preclinical models and clinical trials, to further help develop effective countermeasures against emerging neutralization-escape phenotypes. Full article

Background/Objectives: This retrospective multicenter study, conducted within the ORCHESTRA Project, investigated SARS-CoV-2 reinfections among 5777 healthcare workers (HCWs) from four University Hospitals (Modena, Verona, Padova and Trieste) in northern Italy, aiming to assess the risk of reinfection and its determinants, comparing the clinical characteristics of reinfections with those of first infections, and examining the impact of preventive measures and vaccination strategies. Methods: HCWs completed an online questionnaire between June and August 2022. The survey collected demographic, occupational, and clinical data, including information on first infections and reinfections. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0, through bivariate and multivariate approaches. Results: Response rates were 41.8% for Modena, 39.5% for Verona, 17.9% for Padova, and 17.4% for Trieste. Among the respondents, 4.8% (n = 276) experienced 2 infections and 0.5% (n = 27) reported 3 infections, out of a total of 330 reinfection cases. Additionally, 43.0% (n = 2787) reported only one infection, while 51.5% were never infected. Reinfection rates increased across five study phases (based on the epidemiological context), likely due to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. A booster vaccine dose significantly reduced reinfection risk. Higher reinfection risk was found among HCWs aged ≤30 years, those with chronic respiratory diseases, and those working in COVID-19 wards, particularly nurses and allied health professionals. Reinfections were associated with a lower frequency of symptoms both during the period of swab positivity and after a negative swab, as well as with a shorter duration of swab positivity. No significant differences in symptom duration were found between first infections and reinfections. Conclusions: Despite its limitations, the online questionnaire proved a useful tool. Natural infection and vaccination reduced both reinfection risk and symptom severity. Prior infections should be considered in planning vaccination schedules and prioritizing HCWs. Full article

Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, managing acute infections in symptomatic individuals, regardless of vaccination status, has been widely debated and extensively studied. Even more concerning, however, is the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women—especially its effects on fetuses and newborns. Several studies have documented complications in both expectant mothers and their infants following infection. Methods: In our previous works, we provided scientific evidence of the bacteriophage behavior of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). This demonstrated that a well-defined combination of two antibiotics, amoxicillin and rifaximin, is associated with the same statistics for subjects affected by severe cases of SARS-CoV-2, regardless of vaccination status. We considered the few cases in the literature regarding the management of pregnancies infected with SARS-CoV-2, as well as previous data published in our works. In this brief case series, we present two pregnancies from the same unvaccinated mother—one prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the other during the spread of the Omicron variant—as well as one pregnancy from a mother vaccinated against COVID-19. We describe the management of acute maternal infection using a previously published protocol that addresses the bacteriophage and toxicological mechanisms associated with SARS-CoV-2. Results: The three pregnancies are compared based on fetal growth and ultrasound findings. This report highlights that, even in unvaccinated mothers, timely and well-guided management of symptomatic COVID-19 can result in positive outcomes. In all cases, intrauterine growth remained within excellent percentiles, and the births resulted in optimal APGAR scores. Conclusions: This demonstrates that a careful and strategic approach, guided by ultrasound controls, can support healthy pregnancies during SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of vaccination status. Full article

Background/Objectives: Saliva as a diagnostic medium for COVID-19 requires fewer resources to collect and is more readily adopted across a range of testers. Our study compared an Emergency Use Authorized direct saliva-to-RT-qPCR test against an FDA-authorized nasal swab RT-qPCR assay for participants who reported symptoms of respiratory infection. Methods: We analyzed 737 symptomatic participants who self-selected to test at either a community testing facility or a walk-in clinic due to respiratory symptoms and provided matched saliva and nasal swab samples. Samples were collected between March and September of 2023, both before and after the declared end of the public health emergency. Results: A total of 120 participants tested positive in at least one of the tests. For participants testing in the first 5 days of reported symptoms, the saliva test had a 94.0 positive percent agreement (PPA; 95% C.I. 88.9–99.1%) with the nasal test and a 99.0 negative percent agreement (NPA; 95% C.I. 98.1–99.9%). The viral load decreased beyond day 1 of reported symptoms for saliva testing. Viral load increased up to day 4 for nasal swabs and then decreased. The same number of discordant positive samples (five each) occurred for both tests within 5 days of symptoms onset. Conclusions: In the endemic phase of COVID-19 and for development of new tests, testing methods that are less invasive are more likely to be adopted. The results of saliva-based versus nasal swab PCR measurements relative to days of symptom onset are needed to optimize future testing strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 pandemics have resulted in high numbers of ICU admissions, with high mortality. Identifying risk factors for ICU mortality at the time of admission can help optimize clinical decision making. However, the risk factors identified may differ, depending on the type of analysis used. Our aim is to compare the risk factors and performance of a linear model (multivariable logistic regression, GLM) with a non-linear model (random forest, RF) in a large national cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicenter database including 8902 critically ill patients with influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 or COVID-19 admitted to 184 Spanish ICUs. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data from the first 24 h were used. Prediction models were built using GLM and RF. The performance of the GLM was evaluated by area under the ROC curve (AUC), precision, sensitivity, and specificity, while the RF by out-of-bag (OOB) error and accuracy. In addition, in the RF, the im-portance of the variables in terms of accuracy reduction (AR) and Gini index reduction (GI) was determined. Results: Overall mortality in the ICU was 25.8%. Model performance was similar, with AUC = 76% for GLM, and AUC = 75.6% for RF. GLM identified 17 independent risk factors, while RF identified 19 for AR and 23 for GI. Thirteen variables were found to be important in both models. Laboratory variables such as procalcitonin, white blood cells, lactate, or D-dimer levels were not significant in GLM but were significant in RF. On the contrary, acute kidney injury and the presence of Acinetobacter spp. were important variables in the GLM but not in the RF. Conclusions: Although the performance of linear and non-linear models was similar, different risk factors were determined, depending on the model used. This alerts clinicians to the limitations and usefulness of studies limited to a single type of model. Full article

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, remarkable progress has been made in the development of antiviral therapies for SARS-CoV-2. Several direct-acting antivirals, such as remdesivir, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, offer clinical benefits. These agents have significantly contributed to reducing the viral loads and duration of the illness, as well as the disease’s severity and mortality. However, despite these advances, important limitations remain. The continued emergence of resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants highlights the urgent need for adaptable and durable therapeutic strategies. Therefore, this review aims to provide an updated overview of the main antiviral strategies that are used and the discovery of new drugs against SARS-CoV-2, as well as the therapeutic limitations that have shaped clinical management in recent years. The major challenges include resistance associated with viral mutations, limited treatment windows, and unequal access to treatment. Moreover, there is an ongoing need to identify novel compounds with broad-spectrum activity, improved pharmacokinetics, and suitable safety profiles. Combination treatment regimens represent a promising strategy to increase the efficacy of treating COVID-19 while minimizing the potential for resistance. Ideally, these interventions should be safe, affordable, and easy to administer, which would ensure broad global access and equitable treatment and enable control of COVID-19 cases and preparedness for future threats. Full article

Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) is a promising viral vaccine vector for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. Inducing mucosal immunity via the intranasal route is an ideal strategy for rVSV-based vaccines, but it requires extremely stringent safety standards. In this study, we constructed two rVSV variants with amino acid mutations in their M protein: rVSV-M2 with M33A/M51R mutations and rVSV-M4 with M33A/M51R/V221F/S226R mutations, and developed COVID-19 vaccines based on these attenuated vectors. By comparing viral replication capacity, intranasal immunization, intracranial injection, and blood cell counts, we demonstrated that the M protein mutation variants exhibit significant attenuation effects both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, preliminary investigations into the mechanisms of virus attenuation revealed that these attenuated viruses can induce a stronger type I interferon response while reducing inflammation compared to the wild-type rVSV. We developed three candidate vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 using the wildtype VSV backbone with either wild-type M (rVSV-JN.1) and two M mutant variants (rVSV-M2-JN.1 and rVSV-M4-JN.1). Our results confirmed that rVSV-M2-JN.1 and rVSV-M4-JN.1 retain strong immunogenicity while enhancing safety in hamsters. In summary, the rVSV variants with M protein mutations represent promising candidate vectors for mucosal vaccines and warrant further investigation. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to a wide range of acute and chronic disease manifestations. While most infections are mild, a significant number of patients develop severe illness marked by respiratory failure, thromboinflammation, and multi-organ dysfunction. In addition, post-acute sequelae—commonly known as long-COVID—can persist for months. Recent studies have identified the emergence of diverse autoantibodies in COVID-19, including those targeting nuclear antigens, phospholipids, type I interferons, cytokines, endothelial components, and G-protein-coupled receptors. These autoantibodies are more frequently detected in patients with moderate to severe disease and have been implicated in immune dysregulation, vascular injury, and persistent symptoms. This review examines the underlying immunological mechanisms driving autoantibody production during SARS-CoV-2 infection—including molecular mimicry, epitope spreading, and bystander activation—and discusses their functional roles in acute and post-acute disease. We further explore the relevance of autoantibodies in maternal–fetal immunity and comorbid conditions such as autoimmunity and cancer, and we summarize current and emerging therapeutic strategies. A comprehensive understanding of SARS-CoV-2-induced autoantibodies may improve risk stratification, inform clinical management, and guide the development of targeted immunomodulatory therapies. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques—ranging from hybrid mechanistic–machine learning (ML) ensembles to gradient-boosted decision trees, support-vector machines, and deep neural networks—are transforming the management of seasonal influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptom-based triage models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forests, as well as imaging classifiers built on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have improved diagnostic accuracy across respiratory infections. Transformer-based architectures and social media surveillance pipelines have enabled real-time monitoring of COVID-19. In HIV research, support-vector machines (SVMs), logistic regression, and deep neural network (DNN) frameworks advance viral-protein classification and drug-resistance mapping, accelerating antiviral and vaccine discovery. Despite these successes, persistent challenges remain—data heterogeneity, limited model interpretability, hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), and infrastructure gaps in low-resource settings. We recommend standardized open-access data pipelines and integration of explainable-AI methodologies to ensure safe, equitable deployment of AI-driven interventions in future viral-outbreak responses. Full article