You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Membranes
  • Feature Paper
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 June 2021

Mitochondrial Cristae Architecture and Functions: Lessons from Minimal Model Systems

and
1
Laboratoire Jean Perrin, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, UMR 8237, 75005 Paris, France
2
Faculté des Sciences et Ingénierie, Sorbonne Université, UFR 925 Physique, 75005 Paris, France
3
Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes (MSC), Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, UMR 7057 CNRS, 75013 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrostatics in Cell Membranes and in Artificial Membrane Models

Abstract

Mitochondria are known as the powerhouse of eukaryotic cells. Energy production occurs in specific dynamic membrane invaginations in the inner mitochondrial membrane called cristae. Although the integrity of these structures is recognized as a key point for proper mitochondrial function, less is known about the mechanisms at the origin of their plasticity and organization, and how they can influence mitochondria function. Here, we review the studies which question the role of lipid membrane composition based mainly on minimal model systems.

1. Introduction

Mitochondria are involved in different cellular functions, but they are essentially responsible for cellular ATP production through the so-called oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). This process occurs in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) in specific dynamic membrane invaginations called cristae. The shape of these structures and their number can differ depending on cellular type with different energetic requirements [1,2]. Cristae also undergo continuous cycles of membrane remodeling in physiological conditions [3]. If it is consensually accepted that their integrity is crucial for correct mitochondria functioning [4,5,6,7], less is known about the mechanisms by which membrane shape and composition operate to influence ATP production.
Different proteins have been evidenced to be involved in the morphological structuration of cristae. The most recognized of them are the MICOS complex, the protein OPA1 and the dimers of ATP synthase. Several reviews have summarized the knowledge on these proteins (see for example [5,6]), so it will not be the topic of the present review. Here, we are more interested in highlighting how the physicochemical properties of different mitochondrial phospholipids can trigger interesting behaviors susceptible to influence mitochondrial membrane morphology and organization. Indeed, the IMM contains almost 50 % of cone-shaped lipids, which is unique in biological membranes [8]. These lipids have a geometrical shape promoting nonbilayer phases and bilayer curvature stress [9,10]. They are known to stabilize membrane proteins, but also to increase the capacity of the membrane to sustain fast remodeling required for biological functions such as fusion, fission, budding [11], and possibly in cristae-shape dynamics. This property, called morphological plasticity [12] is not only dependent on which lipid species are present, but also on how they are distributed. In fact, some lipids can be enriched in regions of high curvature and also asymmetrically distributed between the two leaflets of the bilayer. There also exists a lateral heterogeneity, caused either by the formation of proteo-lipid domains, or by lipid-driven mechanisms such as phase separation phenomena. The result can be the formation of localized domains in the plane of the membrane, which can have distinct compositions, structures, and biological functions. Finally, the structure of each individual lipid species and their interaction with others components of the membrane can change in response to physicochemical modifications of their surrounding environments such as pH, ionic strength and temperature, and can thus serve as a way to regulate or modify biological functions of the membrane in which they are situated in a non-specific way. Thus, the mitochondrial membrane, through its lipid composition, possesses a lipid membrane identity that can partly dictate its behavior [8].
An important part of the insight into membrane structure/function relationship in biology—and the concepts used to describe them—have come from studies of minimal model systems as models of biological membranes. These minimal model systems, bioinspired and based on a minimal number of key components identified for the respective function to analyse, provide a bottom-up approach to the study of biological membranes. They help to shape our intuition, to make quantitative predictions possible, and to guide experiments and the subsequent analysis and interpretation of the data. In this review, we looked at the recent studies performed using such in silico and in vitro minimal model systems which could explain for a part the dynamic behavior of cristae, and the consequences of their morphology on specific mitochondrial lipid sorting, lipid leaflet asymmetry and possible lateral heterogeneity. Finally, we discuss the possible functional implications of such organization and lipid composition.

2. Mitochondrial Cristae: Dynamics Bioenergetic Compartments

Mitochondria are complex organelles that arose from endosymbiosis over 1 billion years ago [13]. There are made up of two membranes. While the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) envelops the organelle, the IMM is subdivided into two compartments, the inner boundary membrane (IBM) and the cristae membrane (CM). The two membranes give rise to two aqueous compartments: the intermembrane space (IMS) and mitochondrial matrix (Figure 1). Cristae are multiple tubular or lamellar invaginations into the matrix separated from the rest of the IMM by cristae junctions (CJs). The CJs act as diffusion barriers and therefore contribute to delimiting cristae-bounded biochemical processes [14].
Figure 1. Structure of mitochondrial microcompartments. (A) Schematic representation of mitochondrial architecture. The outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), inner boundary membrane (IBM), cristae junctions (CJ), intermembrane space (IMS), cristae membrane (CM) and mitochondrial matrix are indicated. (B) Electron micrograph from a cryo cut mitochondrion with antibody probing of OXPHOS complexes. The localization in the cristae membrane is obvious. Inset: detailed view of the two IMM compartments CM and IBM connected by the cristae junction (CJ). Scale bar: 150 nm. Reproduced with permission from Frey et al. [15], Trends Biochem. Sci.; published by Elsevier, 2000.
The IMM is among the protein-richest membrane of the cell [16]. In order to get a quantitative idea of such protein crowding, M. Schlame [17] describes a stoichiometric model of the IMM created on the basis of the molecular size and the concentration of the most abundant proteins and lipids suggesting that about half of the hydrophobic volume of the membrane is occupied by proteins and that the average surface-to-surface distance between proteins is <10 nm. Albeit this protein content is exceptional high, it still can be assumed that the IMM behaves as a semifluid arrangement of lipids and integrated proteins [18]. Importantly, cristae contain protein complexes responsible for the OXPHOS process: the oxidation of electron donors NADH and FADH 2 , produced by fatty acid oxidation and the citric acid cycle in the matrix, allow a flow of electrons through electron transport chain machinery which induced the pumping of protons from the matrix to the interior of the cristae. It allows the creation of an electrochemical gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane which serves as the driving force (proton-motive force, PMF) for the production of ATP by the mitochondrial F 1 F O -ATP synthase according to the Mitchell’s theory [19].
The IMM morphology and organization are crucial for the assembly and proper function of the enzymes involved in OXPHOS process, as well as in the establishment of the proton gradient [4,5]. It was also shown that cristae shape and number can change depending on energy requirement [1,2,20] while, in different pathologies, alteration of mitochondrial function is most of the time associated with cristae destructuration [21,22,23]. This strongly suggests that a structure-function relationship exist at the cristae level.

2.1. Morphology and Structure-Function Relationship of Cristae

The presence of cristae was originally supposed to be the only consequence of the fold of the IMM due to the smaller outer membrane surface (baffle model [24]). However, results from electron tomography made this description more complex, since cristae are composed of different parts (Figure 1), with the presence of CJ, and the coexistence of tubular or lamellar structures [25]. Different proteins have been recognized as regulators of cristae structure (see reviews [5,26,27]). For example, the assembly of ATP synthase dimers into rows can induce membrane curvature and could be the first step in the formation of mitochondrial cristae [28]. Several theoretical models have also been developed to describe the IMM structure. It was first investigated how observed morphologies of restricted portions of the IMM can be used to infer thermodynamic information regarding typical membrane configurations [29,30]. Then, the model was completed in order to report the IMM morphological complexity (tubular and lamellar structure coexistence) [31]. Based on the minimization of the free energy of the system (IBM plus cristae), the stationary states found resemble the shapes of real cristae sufficiently closely that consistent and reasonable values of the thermodynamic properties—pressure difference across the IMM, membrane surface tension, tensile force required to stabilize the structure—of the cristae observed could be calculated. It was also speculated that protein such as OPA1 might apply this tensile force through a scaffolding mechanism [31].
From a functional point of view, cristae structure was proposed to increase the inner membrane surface and thus to enhance the capacity of oxidative phosphorylation [26]. Cristae were further hypothesized to serve as a specialized compartment ensuring optimal conditions for ATP production by concentrating proteins involved in OXPHOS and reducing the mean distance between the different actors [32,33]. A local PMF is thus established more favorably in cristae than outside. This point was confirmed in a theoretical study [34] in which it was also showed that high proton concentration in cristae can be induced by the morphology-dependent electric potential along the outer side of the IMM (Figure 2A). It was also predicted that the cristae surface-to-volume ratio and surface area are more important than the cristae geometry for generating the PMF and determining the rates of ATP production (Figure 2B,C).
Figure 2. Mitochondrial model with a single cristae. (A) Proton concentration distribution (expressed as pH) in the inner mitochondrial space (cristae and non-cristae portions). (B) Geometry used to investigate the effect of detailed cristae morphology. (C) Effect of the surface-to-volume ratio (SVR) on the average PMF on the cristae membrane ( Δ p C M ). Reproduced with permission from Song et al. [34], Phys. Rev. E; published by the APS, 2013.
So, many hypothesis exist to explain the structure-function relationship existing in cristae, but an interesting axis of reflection is to understand how cristae shape can be modulated depending on energy state.

2.2. Plasticity of Cristae

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles of the cell whose shape constantly changes in vivo through fission and fusion events [35]. From a bioenergetic point of view, these mechanisms, associated with mitophagy, allow a quality control to keep optimal mitochondria function [36]. Other roles of such remodeling capacity have been also described in several physiological processes, including metabolic changes, redox signaling, calcium homeostasis and apoptosis [35,37]. In all cases, these dynamic events are usually associated with a rearrangement of the IMM morphology, especially at the level of mitochondrial cristae.
Intriguingly, it has been observated that the change of cristae structure depends on energetic state. In 1966, Hackenbrock [38] reported one of the earliest examples of mitochondrial dynamics when he noted that, in the presence of an excess of ADP (respiratory state III, active mitochondria), mitochondria showed a condensed conformation with large swollen intra-cristal space volume, while under ADP limiting conditions (respiratory state IV, rest condition), this volume was considerably decreased (orthodox conformation). This was the first evidence implying that cristae shape undergo dramatic changes in response to changes in metabolic state. These observations have been confirmed later by 3D electron tomography by the group of Mannella [25]. Both states are illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Illustration of the cross section of a mitochondrion observed under different metabolic conditions. The condensed morphology appears in the presence of high ADP concentrations, when mitochondria are producing ATP (state III), while the orthodox configuration occurs at low ADP concentrations, with no production of ATP (state IV). Reproduced with permission from Manella [25], Biochim. Biophys. Acta; published by Elsevier, 2006.
Different theories regarding how deformations of the mitochondrial membrane in general affect the ATP production rate have been proposed [3,7,34,39]. One of them was related to the elastic property of the IMM [39]. According to this theory, variations in the mechanical stress on the mitochondrial membrane can promote changes in inner mitochondrial membrane potential (assuming that the mitochondrial membrane behaves as a capacitor) and could serve as a feedback mechanism that controls the oxidative phosphorylation. Recent experiments [40] performed with purified ATP synthase reconstituted in liposomes also evidenced that the coupled proton pumping and rotation activities of the protein promote nonequilibrium membrane fluctuations at localized hot spots where the active proteins might be clustered. Thus, the activity of the F 1 F o -ATPase could favor the decrease in the bending stiffness of the membrane and the concomitant lowering of its surface tension, which could be the trigger for the change of the cristae morphology.
Today, more than 50 years after Hackenbrock’s observations, the study of mitochondrial membrane dynamics is a very active field of research. Cristae are now recognized as dynamic individual bioenergetic units [3]. This dynamic nature has been even directly observed using the new imaging techniques of super-resolution [41,42,43,44,45,46], capturing the continuous fusions/fissions occurring during time. However, to our knowledge, no clear relationship between cristae dynamics and mitochondria function has been demonstrated and visualized yet using such approaches. Some questions also remain about the molecular actors involved in this membrane plasticity and in mitochondrial function. They should be able to modulate membrane mechanical properties in a time dependent manner in response to an external trigger, and to change the OXPHOS efficency to modulate energy production. Despite a large amount of proteins potentially involved, IMM contains specific lipids which could support this role.

3. Lipids of Mitochondria: Focus on the IMM

Lipid compositions of both mitochondrial membranes exhibit features that set them apart from other cellular membranes. First, they contain mainly phospholipids, whereas only trace amounts of sterols and sphingolipids are present. Second, a hallmark of mitochondria is the high content of cardiolipin (CL), especially in the IMM [16,47]. The lipid composition of the IMM varies from that of the OMM. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) are the most abundant phospholipids in the IMM, comprising about 75 % of total lipids. However, the concentration of PE is slightly higher in the IMM compared to the OMM, while the opposite is true for phosphatidylinositol (PI) [48]. One of the biggest differences between OMM and IMM lipid composition is the greater concentration of CL that is found in the IMM. Here, CL makes up about 15– 20 % of the total phospholipid mass [48]. Like all biological membranes, IMM lipid composition is tightly regulated and crucial for the organization and dynamics of cristae.

3.1. Presentation of the Main IMM Lipids

PC is the most abundant phospholipid of the IMM. It is a zwitterionic phospholipid, comprised of a hydrophilic choline head group bound to a glycerolphosphate molecule which contains two fatty acyl chains [49]. Bilayer-forming phospholipids like PC are cylindrically shaped with the fatty acid portions defining extended hydrophobic domains and the polar head groups defining the short hydrophilic domains along the length of the cylinder. The nearly equivalent diameters of the cylinder in both domains allow molecular packing that favors bilayers. PE is the second most abundant phospholipid in mitochondrial membranes. PE is also a zwitterionic phospholipid, composed of a glycerol phosphate backbone bound to two fatty acid chains in one end, and a polar ethanolamine head group in the other. The relative small-sized head group gives PE a conical shape, making it the most abundant nonbilayer forming phospholipid in mitochondria [49]. Finally, CL is a distinguishing component of the IMM and a unique phospholipid that not only differs from other membrane phospholipids regarding its membrane specificity, but also in its chemical structure. CL is an anionic molecule, and as opposed to other glycerophospholipids, it has a dimeric molecular structure which is composed of three glycerol groups, two phosphate moieties and four esterified fatty acyl chains, all bound to a compact polar head group [26,49]. From this structure results its distinctive conical shape. Under normal physiologic conditions, CL may only carry one negative charge at a time because the phosphates of CL are diastereotopically inequivalent, and thus ionize at two different pH levels [50,51]. This allows CL to possibly trap protons within its headgroup and thereby localize the proton pool near the surface of the IMM. The notion that CL contains two different pK a ’s is still disputed and has been challenged and rejected by several groups [52,53,54] that claimed that the two ionizable phosphates are both deprotonated at physiological pH imparting a headgroup charge of −2.
The phospholipid diversity in the inner mitochondrial membrane is also influenced by variation in length and degree of unsaturation of fatty acyl chain present within each class of phospholipid. The role of the various fatty acyl chains of phospholipids is indeed crucial. For instance, the fluidity of a membrane at a given temperature or the extend of a lipid nonbilayer preference are determined by the acyl chain composition and nature [55,56]. The acyl chains of CL are highly tissue specific, varying from species to species. Most mammalian tissues have CL predominantly composed of 18 carbon unsaturated acyl chains, the vast majority of which are linoleic acid (18:2) [57]. In mammalian cardiac mitochondria for instance, this is the case for 85 % of the total CL acyl chains, making tetralinoleoyl-cardiolipin [(18:2) 4 CL] the most common CL species of this tissue [58]. With the exception of the acyl chain remodeling of CL, the regulation of the acyl chain composition of mitochondrial lipids is still poorly understood [47].

3.2. IMM Lipid Shape Matters

Not all phospholipid species, when hydrated, assemble in bilayers. There are many examples of lipids that have a preference for assembling as nonbilayer phases [59]. These differential nonlamellar-forming tendencies have long been explained with the relaxed molecular shape of a phospholipid [12]. Optimally, a phospholipid self-assembles into a supramolecular structure that reflects the relaxed shape of its molecule under given conditions (Figure 4). The essence of this shape concept can be captured and quantified with monolayer spontaneous curvature C 0 which describes the monolayer curvature of this supramolecular structure. In general, lipids with molecular shapes different from cylinders will form monolayers that either curve away or towards the polar/apolar interface ( C 0 0 ) [60] (Figure 5). For example, lipids with a negative spontaneous curvature ( C 0 < 0 ) are prone to form non-planar structure like inverted hexagonal phases H I I . When the phospholipids with different C 0 s are mixed, the resulting structure would exhibit a collective C 0 weighted by the relative amounts of the composing phospholipids [61].
Figure 4. Molecular geometry of lipids and membrane stored stress. Monolayers made of cylindrical molecules of zero spontaneous curvature (SC) can form nonstressed lamellas (first column, green lipid). However, for nonzero SC, lipid molecules have to be reshaped to fit into a flat state, leading to membrane stress (second column, orange lipid). When the stress accumulated in the resulting bilayer is too big, the transition of the lamella into a nonlamellar phase is favorable. The transition begins when small interlamellar contacts having characteristic hourglass shape form (third column, red lipid), lipids with negative SC promotes formation of these localized nonbilayer structures [12].
Figure 5. Curvature frustration illustrated for the case of a symmetric bilayer consisting of two monolayers that have an inherent desire to bend. In order to avoid energetically unfavourable voids (blue triangles), the two monolayers must lie flat back-to-back, resulting in a stored curvature elastic stress [10].
In planar membranes, non-zero C 0 monolayers are forced into a flat topology, where they lie back-to-back— in order to avoid energetically unfavorable voids–leading to significant curvature elastic stress that is stored within the membrane [10] (Figure 5). However, this effect can only be tolerated up to a certain point. Upon further stressing the bilayer, a transition to a nonlamellar phase would be induced. Interestingly, the IMM contains a particularly high level of these cone-shaped lipids such as PE and CL (almost 50 % ). They assume a patent conical shape owing to the smaller cross-sectional area of their headgroups relative to their often unsaturated and kinked acyl chains. Whereas zwitterionic PE tends to form nonbilayer phases on their own ( C 0 < 0 ) [59], anionic CL, owing to the electrostatic repulsion between its charged headgroup, necessitate charge neutralization by divalent cations, by changes in pH or by ionic strength to facilitate this phase transition (i.e., that C 0 varies with the environmental conditions) [54,62]. Interestingly, Chen et al. [63] have shown that the C 0 , D O P E has a clear dependence on temperature whereas it demonstrates a weak response to the [ C a 2 + ] variations at all the studied temperatures. On the contrary, C 0 , [ 18 : 1 ] C L is essentially independent of temperature at nearly each the [ C a 2 + ] examined but shows a response to the [ C a 2 + ] variation far more pronounced than for DOPE.
Due to the properties of its lipid constituents, the IMM could be under elastic stress and prone to the formation of nonlamellar local structure with possible functional consequences (see Section 5.3.2).

4. Physicochemical Properties of Only-IMM Lipid Systems

The main IMM lipids, and in particular CL, are naturally the basic building blocks of any IMM-mimicking minimal system. Therefore, an important amount of work has been aimed at understanding different CL-dependent properties of only-lipid systems. Numerous studies have probed the biophysical properties of binary mixtures of CL with PC or PE lipids whereas those investigate the properties of CL in mixed PC-PE lipid membranes are less frequent.

4.1. Interactions of CL with Other Phospholipids

The behavior of lipid monolayers composed of binary mixtures of bovine cardiac CL and egg PC (EPC) at the air/water interface of a Langmuir trough has been examined [64]. This study indicates that CL and EPC are fully miscible with each other at all proportions tested and that CL enhances lateral interactions between lipids within monolayer leaflets. Very similar results were presented in other monolayer film studies of mixtures of CL with respectively POPC or POPE in the Domenech’s work [65] and DPPC or DPPE in Sennato’s work [66]. It was also observed in both studies that the CL-PE systems—supported planar bilayers in [65] and supported monolayers in [66]—formed different lipid domains believed to be caused by the tendency of both lipids to form hexagonal phases. In silico attempts have also been made to model the effect of CL on different matrices (PC, PE, and mixed PC–PE for reference [67]) using both coarse-grained [68] and molecular dynamics simulations [67,69]. These studies suggest as well that the incorporation of CL into PC bilayers should have a significant ordering effect, predictions supported by the experimental observations of Khalifat et al. [70]. On the other side, Róg et al. [67] showed that the effects of CL in ternary membrane systems are complex and cannot be easily deduced from the corresponding ones in binary membranes. Indeed, the ternary mixture of PC, PE, and 10 mol% CL they modeled was only mildly condensed as compared to the corresponding CL-free binary PC-PE bilayer. Similarly, the results from the simulations by Pöyry et al. [71] and Wilson et al. [72] indicated a small condensation in a ternary lipid bilayer. Additionally, fluorescence experiments performed by Khalifat et al. [70] suggested that although the addition of 10 % CL to PC bilayers (at pH 7.4) leads to condensation, there was no discernible effect on mixed PC-PE bilayers. Taken together, these studies suggested that CL induces a mild condensing or ordering effect in mixed PC-PE lipid bilayers as long as the concentration of CL remains less than or equal to the CL physiologically relevant composition (∼20 mol%).

4.2. Mechanical Properties of Only-IMM Lipid Systems

Because lipid bilayers can bend and stretch in ways similar to thin elastic sheets, physical models of bilayer deformation have utilized mechanical constants such as the moduli for bending rigidity ( κ c ) and area compressibility ( K A ) [73]. Indeed, in order to deform a lipid bilayer, the primary energetic cost comes from the bending and stretching of lipids. These modes of deformation alter the separation between polar lipid headgroups and regulate the amount of exposure of nonpolar lipid hydrocarbon tails to the aqueous medium, which also changes the energetic state of the lipids.
There are only few experimental studies on the mechanical properties of bilayers CL. In one of them, Nichols-Smith et al. [64] have shown that CL-containing bilayers are prone to create folds and adopt highly curved structures because both apparent area compressibility modulus and lysis tension decrease with increasing CL content in SOPC bilayers. These findings indicate that a lower stress is required to achieve a given change in membrane area and suggest a weakening of the cohesive strength of the membrane. This latter point has been confirmed in a study by Unsay et al. [74]. In these experiments, an increasing force is exerted on the supported lipid bilayer via an AFM tip until reaching the necessary force to pierce the membrane. CL decreased the breakthrough force of the bilayer in a concentration-dependent manner suggesting again that CL decreases the mechanical stability of the lipid bilayer. This result is assumed to be related to the CL propensity to form lipid arrangements beyond the canonical lipid bilayer [74].
Bilayer deformability is crucial for maintaining the highly curved cristae membrane. A more rigid bilayer accrues a larger energetic penalty when forced into curved morphologies. Membrane bending energetics depend on both the bending modulus κ c and spontaneous curvature of the lipid bilayer constituents [10], so both aspects may play a role in IMM morphology. The bending modulus is a mechanical macroscopic constant that describes the tendency of a certain material to oppose bending. Experimental measurements of pure CL [75] or mixed PC-CL bilayers [76] yield a bending modulus which is larger than that observed in pure PC bilayers indicating that CL stiffens the membrane. In the case of the IMM mechanics, this result has to be taken with caution because saturated tetramyristoyl [(14:0) 4 ] CL and monounsaturated tetraoleoyl [(18:1) 4 ] CL respectively used in these two studies differ from tetralinoleoyl [(18:2) 4 ] CL, the most common CL species [58]. Indeed, even if to the best of our knowledge there is no measurement of κ c for tetralinoleoyl [(18:2) 4 ] CL-containing bilayer, bending rigidity κ c values are known to be lower for polyunsaturated lipid-containing membranes [77,78]. Anyway, a reduction of the bending energy through the intrinsic curvature of the CL may be possible and related to spontaneous curvature of the CL-enriched cristae [79,80].

4.3. Non-Specific Regulatory Roles of IMM Lipids

Non-specific ways by which lipids fulfill their regulatory role are realized through the changes in membrane physical parameters, such as membrane hydrocarbon thickness, surface charge density, lipid head-group hydration, etc. Thus, understanding how physicochemical properties of lipids affect membrane properties is crucial in order to appreciate the importance of the phospholipid molecular species profile for maintaining membrane function in vivo. The particular IMM lipid composition—and the option to modulate its properties, for example by adding calcium [63,81,82,83,84] or lowering pH [54,70,85]—may therefore provide some important biomembrane regulatory mechanisms by giving the possibility to fine-tune the membrane properties. Some of these mechanisms will be developed in the next section.

6. Discussion: Lessons from Minimal Models for Lipid Functional Implications

Alterations of lipid synthesis, integrity or post-maturation can have functional consequences in vivo. In the case of mitochondria, the best example is the Barth syndrome where mutations in the tafazzin gene induce CL remodeling alteration and lower CL abundance [146]. In this pathology, cristae organization is disturbed, associated with a impairment of the OXPHOS functionality [21,147], underlying the possible interconnection between morphology, function and lipid composition at the level of cristae. PE in vivo also seems to play an important role in mitochondrial structure and function [126,127,128], and can compensate CL deficiency [148]. Thus, the cone-shaped characteristics of these lipids and their physicochemical properties made them important molecular players involved in the structure-function relationship existing in cristae as well as in the functioning of OXPHOS process.
As explained in Section 2, an important characteristic of mitochondrial cristae structure is to optimize energy production by creating a local confined environment possessing specific mechanical properties. The experiments using minimal models described above predict that cristae lipid composition could be very specific for physicochemical reasons. Thus, lipids such as CL could contribute to some functional properties of cristae.

6.1. Cristae Plasticity: CL as a Sensor of Proton and Calcium Concentrations for the Modulation of Membrane Properties

The presence of proton-sensitive lipids like CL could allow the modulation of cristae morphology in parallel to energy production [94]. Indeed, during the OXPHOS process, protons, which are pumped from the matrix to the interior of cristae, can interact with CL and modify mechanical properties of the membrane, which is necessary to support energy production [39]. In the same manner, calcium ion can also change CL properties when present at a certain extent [83]. Biologically, both situations are relevant: for example, in muscle cell, in addition to the proton flux, calcium uptake occurs in mitochondria, possibly in a beat-to-beat fashion, which can enhance the activities of different OXPHOS proteins [149]. Calcium interaction with CL could be another way to boost respiration by modifying mechanical membrane properties of cristae, and thus the efficiency of ATP production. So CL is a good candidate to sense variations in energy demand via its ability to interact with protons and calcium.
Additionally, the increase of cristae surface-to-volume ratio could be also facilitate by cone-shaped lipids, since they can facilitate membrane fusion between adjacent cristae [150]. Such events are necessaries to elevate mitochondria capacity to produce ATP at times of increased metabolic demand or decreased fuel supply [104], and can also explain the condensed-to-orthodox transition observed by Hackenbrock [38]. So again, the physicochemical properties of CL and its ability to sense proton and calcium levels can participate to the plasticity of cristae, which is a prerequisite to adapt energy production to energy demand.

6.2. Impact of CL Enrichment in OXPHOS Functioning: To Facilitate Proton Circuit along the Membrane

The presence of CL at a higher extent in the cristae lumen leaflet as demonstrated by in vitro systems and predicted by in silico studies, can directly affect the functioning of the OXPHOS process independently on their effect on OXPHOS protein activity. In a recent study, Prola et al. [23] showed that in a CL-deficient mice induced by the mutation of the HACD1 gene, cristae shape was altered, and a reduced coupling efficiency in the respiratory chain (diminution of the yield of ATP produced by oxygen consumed) was observed, with no change in respiratory chain complex activity and in proton gradient formation. The addition of CL to isolated mitochondria from Hacd1-KO mice (by fusing with CL liposomes) rescued their coupling efficiency, pointed out the specific role of CL content in the efficiency of OXPHOS process. The authors proposed a possible role of CL in facilitating the lateral transfer of protons from respiratory complexes to ATP synthase (see Figure 12). This hypothesis relies on earlier studies proposing an alternative mechanism to the classical Mitchell’s theory, based on local proton circuit on the membrane [151,152,153].
Figure 12. A proposed model of the molecular mechanism underlying the mitochondrial uncoupling in HACD1-deficient muscles. In wild type conditions, anionic lipids included in the cristae lumen leaflet of the IMM contribute to the translocation of protons to the tip of the cristae, where ATP synthase oligomers concentrate. In Hacd1-KO mice, the decreased content of anionic lipids changes cristae shape, reduces efficiency of proton translocation, hence impairing ATP production.
Indeed, a proton transfer from a proton generator to an acceptor is faster if occurring on the membrane rather than having the protons released into the aqueous bulk. Thus, a localized coupling can occur very rapidly on the membrane as opposed to the delocalized coupling [154,155]. Different lipids can participate to this proton transport circuit at the membrane’s surface, but CL, due to its ability to “trap” protons [156] and its asymmetric enrichment within the leaflets of cristae, is the best candidate, and could facilitate such proton transport and optimize mitochondrial function.

6.3. Role of Lipid Lateral Heterogeneity in ATP Synthase Functioning

Cone-shaped lipid such as CL can also participate in specific membrane organization which will impact cristae function. Gasanov et al. [102] hypothesize that CL, the ATP synthase, and a proton gradient facilitate the formation of nonbilayer structures in the IMM which in turn stimulates ATP synthesis. They suggest that the low pH arising from the proton gradient makes CL transition from a bilayer to a nonlamellar phase, which leads to membrane sections organized as inverted micelles. These sections are predominantly composed of CL, which will localize to the highly curved sections of the micelle. The resulting membrane domains attract the F 0 part of the ATP synthase and promotes the clustering of protons. The enriched CL concentrations increases the membrane’s ability to hold on the high proton concentration as the negatively charged headgroup of CL serve as “proton traps” which accelerate proton translocation and subsequent ATP synthesis. As shown in Figure 13, the inverted micellar organization of cristae decreases the cristae volume in which the proton accumulates, effectively increasing the proton concentration. If the proton gradient becomes too high, Gasanov et al. suggests the formation of short-lived toroidal-like pores as a way of rapidly decreasing in the transmembrane potential by releasing protons into the mitochondrial matrix. In conclusion, they attribute CL a role as a modulator of ATP synthesis via its properties to locally self-organize in nonbilayer structures which impact OXPHOS functioning.
Figure 13. Illustration of Gasanov et al’s hypothesis suggesting the inverted micellar organization of cristae membranes (shown by red brackets). Reproduced with permission from Gasanov et al. [102], Biochim. Biophys. Acta.; published by Elsevier, 2018.
So, again, cone-shaped lipid such as CL can participate actively to the optimal function of OXPHOS process, in a way that can be understood and analysed using minimal models, taking into account, of course, the results obtained in intact mitochondria.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we tried to provide a comprehensive overview on the knowledge of the mitochondrial lipid properties which could help to decipher the functioning of mitochondrial cristae. We focused on the results obtained using minimal model systems because they allow the study of specific lipid properties more directly than in biological systems. These approaches suggest that the presence of a high content of cone-shaped lipids like CL in curved membrane such as cristae could be an important feature of ATP production regulation. Of course, the existence of CL enrichment in cristae needs to be demonstrated in intact cells, perhaps using super-resolution imaging techniques. The dynamic structure-function relationship existing in cristae also needs confirmation in a more straightforward way. Finally, experiments in minimal models mostly utilize synthetic lipids that don’t take into account the great diversity of lipids existing in biological membranes. Using more systematically natural lipid extracts would be more relevant in future experiments.
The goal of this review is not to minimize the role of many proteins probably involved in specific tasks, but more to encourage readers to consider lipid properties as an important source of possible biological functions. For historical and technical reasons, most therapeutic strategies target proteins, whilst lipids are often neglected. However, the 40,000 identified lipids (www.lipidmaps.org, accessed on June 2020) massively contribute to the architecture and functions of the cell; they represent an equivalent amount of bioactive molecules that, to a large extent, determine the functioning of membrane proteins. Modulating their levels, localization or metabolism will obviously become an emergent, alternative therapeutical issue. Better understanding the role of specific mitochondrial lipids, especially using minimal model systems, in the dynamics of cristae, and in the functioning of the OXPHOS process, can open mechanistic modulating opportunities, which feasibility can be assessed in cellular models.

Author Contributions

F.J. and N.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge H. Ramsvik whose bibliographic internship served as the starting point for this review. We thank A. Prola for the elaboration of the Figure 12. We also thank D. Chatenay and A. Prola for careful proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
OXPHOSOxidative phosphorylation
IMMInner mitochondrial membrane
MICOSMitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing System
OPA1GTPase optic atrophy 1
OMMOuter mitochondrial membrane
IBMInner boundary membrane
CMCristae membrane
IMSInner mitochondrial space
CJsCristae junctions
NADHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrogen
FADH_2Flavin adenine dinucleotide hydroquinone form
PMFProton-motive force
F 1 F o -ATP synthaseF-type ATP synthase
CLCardiolipin
PCPhosphatidylcholine
PEPhosphatidylethanolamine
PIPhosphatidylinositol
DOPE1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
EPCEgg phosphatidylcholine
POPC1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine
POPE1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
DPPC1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
DPPE1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
SOPC1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
GUVGiant unilamellar vesicle
PSPhosphatidylserine
PGPhosphatidylglycerol
Cyt cCytochrome c
DCCD-BPFDicyclohexylcarbodiimide-binding protein of the F 0 sector
NAONonyl acridine orange
SMPSubmitochondrial particle
LUVLarge unilamellar vesicle
TTAPE-Me1,1,2,2-tetrakis[4-(2-trimethylammonioethoxy)-phenyl]ethene
HACD13-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 1

References

  1. Vafai, S.; Mootha, V. Mitochondrial disorders as windows into an ancient organelle. Nature 2012, 491, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pánek, T.; Eliáš, M.; Vancová, M.; Lukeš, J.; Hashimi, H. Returning to the Fold for Lessons in Mitochondrial Crista Diversity and Evolution. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R575–R588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kondadi, A.K.; Anand, R.; Reichert, A.S. Cristae Membrane Dynamics—A Paradigm Change. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 923–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zick, M.; Rabl, R.; Reichert, A.S. Cristae formation—linking ultrastructure and function of mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2009, 1793, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cogliati, S.; Enriquez, J.A.; Scorrano, L. Mitochondrial Cristae: Where Beauty Meets Functionality. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Colina-Tenorio, L.; Horten, P.; Pfanner, N.; Rampelt, H. Shaping the mitochondrial inner membrane in health and disease. J. Intern. Med. 2020, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Glancy, B.; Kim, Y.; Katti, P.; Willingham, T.B. The Functional Impact of Mitochondrial Structure Across Subcellular Scales. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Casares, D.; Escribá, P.V.; Rosselló, C.A. Membrane Lipid Composition: Effect on Membrane and Organelle Structure, Function and Compartmentalization and Therapeutic Avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cullis, P.; De Kruijff, B. Lipid polymorphism and the functional roles of lipids in biological membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Biomembr. 1979, 559, 399–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shearman, G.C.; Ces, O.; Templer, R.H.; Seddon, J.M. Inverse lyotropic phases of lipids and membrane curvature. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S1105–S1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Burger, K.N. Greasing Membrane Fusion and Fission Machineries. Traffic 2000, 1, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Frolov, V.; Shnyrova, A.; Zimmerberg, J. Lipid Polymorphisms and Membrane Shape. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roger, A.J.; Muñoz-Gómez, S.A.; Kamikawa, R. The Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R1177–R1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Raven, J.A. Determinants, and implications, of the shape and size of thylakoids and cristae. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 257, 153342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Frey, T.G.; Manella, C.A. The internal structure of mitochondria. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Horvath, S.E.; Daum, G. Lipids of mitochondria. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 590–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schlame, M. Protein crowding in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2021, 1862, 148305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Busch, K.B. Inner mitochondrial membrane compartmentalization: Dynamics across scales. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2020, 120, 105694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mitchell, P. Coupling of Phosphorylation to Electron and Hydrogen Transfer by a Chemi-Osmotic type of Mechanism. Nature 1961, 191, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nielsen, J.; Gejl, K.; Hey-Mogensen, M.; Holmberg, H.C.; Suetta, C.; Krustrup, P.; Elemans, C.; Ortenblad, N. Plasticity in mitochondrial cristae density allows metabolic capacity modulation in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2016, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Acehan, D.; Xu, Y.; Stokes, D.; Schlame, M. Comparison of lymphoblast mitochondria from normal subjects and patients with Barth syndrome using electron microscopic tomography. Lab. Investig. A J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 2007, 87, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siegmund, S.E.; Grassucci, R.; Carter, S.D.; Barca, E.; Farino, Z.J.; Juanola-Falgarona, M.; Zhang, P.; Tanji, K.; Hirano, M.; Schon, E.A.; et al. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Mitochondrial Crista Ultrastructure in a Patient with Leigh Syndrome by In Situ Cryoelectron Tomography. iScience 2018, 6, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Prola, A.; Blondelle, J.; Vandestienne, A.; Piquereau, J.; Denis, R.G.P.; Guyot, S.; Chauvin, H.; Mourier, A.; Maurer, M.; Henry, C.; et al. Cardiolipin content controls mitochondrial coupling and energetic efficiency in muscle. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Palade, G.E. The fine structure of mitochondria. Anat. Rec. 1952, 114, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mannella, C.A. Structure and dynamics of the mitochondrial inner membrane cristae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ikon, N.; Ryan, R.O. Cardiolipin and mitochondrial cristae organization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Quintana-Cabrera, R.; Mehrotra, A.; Rigoni, G.; Soriano, M. Who and how in the regulation of mitochondrial cristae shape and function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 500, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blum, T.B.; Hahn, A.; Meier, T.; Davies, K.M.; Kühlbrandt, W. Dimers of mitochondrial ATP synthase induce membrane curvature and self-assemble into rows. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 4250–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Renken, C.; Siragusa, G.; Perkins, G.; Washington, L.; Nulton, J.; Salamon, P.; Frey, T.G. A thermodynamic model describing the nature of the crista junction: A structural motif in the mitochondrion. J. Struct. Biol. 2002, 138, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ponnuswamy, A.; Nulton, J.; Mahaffy, J.M.; Salamon, P.; Frey, T.G.; Baljon, A.R.C. Modeling tubular shapes in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Phys. Biol. 2005, 2, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ghochani, M.; Nulton, J.; Salamon, P.; Frey, T.; Rabinovitch, A.; Baljon, A. Tensile Forces and Shape Entropy Explain Observed Crista Structure in Mitochondria. Biophys. J. 2010, 99, 3244–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gilkerson, R.W.; Selker, J.M.; Capaldi, R.A. The cristal membrane of mitochondria is the principal site of oxidative phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2003, 546, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vogel, F.; Bornhövd, C.; Neupert, W.; Reichert, A.S. Dynamic subcompartmentalization of the mitochondrial inner membrane. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 175, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Song, D.H.; Park, J.; Maurer, L.; Lu, W.; Philbert, M.; Sastry, A. Biophysical significance of the inner mitochondrial membrane structure on the electrochemical potential of mitochondria. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2013, 88, 062723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Westermann, B. Westermann BMitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat. Reviews. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Twig, G.; Hyde, B.; Shirihai, O.S. Mitochondrial fusion, fission and autophagy as a quality control axis: The bioenergetic view. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2008, 1777, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piquereau, J.; Caffin, F.; Novotova, M.; Prola, A.; Garnier, A.; Mateo, P.; Fortin, D.; Huynh, L.H.; Nicolas, V.; Alavi, M.V.; et al. Down-regulation of OPA1 alters mouse mitochondrial morphology, PTP function, and cardiac adaptation to pressure overload. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 94, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hackenbrock, C.R. Ultrastructural bases for metabolically linked mechanical activity in mitochondria: I. Reversible Ultrastructural Changes with Change in Metabolic Steady State in Isolated Liver Mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 1966, 30, 269–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chvanov, M. Metabolic Control of Elastic Properties of the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 22903–22909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Almendro-Vedia, V.G.; Natale, P.; Mell, M.; Bonneau, S.; Monroy, F.; Joubert, F.; López-Montero, I. Nonequilibrium fluctuations of lipid membranes by the rotating motor protein F1F0-ATP synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11291–11296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, X.; Fan, J.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Wu, R.; Wu, Y.; Wei, L.; Mao, H.; Lal, A.; Xi, P.; et al. Fast, long-term, super-resolution imaging with Hessian structured illumination microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stephan, T.; Roesch, A.; Riedel, D.; Jakobs, S. Live-cell STED nanoscopy of mitochondrial cristae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, C.; Taki, M.; Sato, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Yaginuma, H.; Okada, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. A photostable fluorescent marker for the superresolution live imaging of the dynamic structure of the mitochondrial cristae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 15817–15822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wolf, D.M.; Segawa, M.; Kondadi, A.K.; Anand, R.; Bailey, S.T.; Reichert, A.S.; van der Bliek, A.M.; Shackelford, D.B.; Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S. Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Segawa, M.; Wolf, D.M.; Hultgren, N.W.; Williams, D.S.; van der Bliek, A.M.; Shackelford, D.B.; Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S. Quantification of cristae architecture reveals time-dependent characteristics of individual mitochondria. Life Sci. Alliance 2020, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kondadi, A.K.; Anand, R.; Hänsch, S.; Urbach, J.; Zobel, T.; Wolf, D.M.; Segawa, M.; Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S.; Weidtkamp-Peters, S.; et al. Cristae undergo continuous cycles of membrane remodelling in a MICOS-dependent manner. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e49776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Osman, C.; Voelker, D.R.; Langer, T. Making heads or tails of phospholipids in mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 192, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Daum, G.; Vance, J.E. Import of lipids into mitochondria. Prog. Lipid Res. 1997, 36, 103–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mejia, E.M.; Hatch, G.M. Mitochondrial phospholipids: Role in mitochondrial function. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2016, 48, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kates, M.; Syz, J.Y.; Gosser, D.; Haines, T.H. pH-dissociation characteristics of cardiolipin and its 2′-deoxy analogue. Lipids 1993, 28, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lewis, R.N.; McElhaney, R.N. The physicochemical properties of cardiolipin bilayers and cardiolipin-containing lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2009, 1788, 2069–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sathappa, M.; Alder, N.N. The ionization properties of cardiolipin and its variants in model bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2016, 1858, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Olofsson, G.; Sparr, E. Ionization Constants pKa of Cardiolipin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kooijman, E.; Swim, L.; Graber, Z.; Tyurina, Y.; Bayır, H.; Kagan, V. Magic angle spinning 31P NMR spectroscopy reveals two essentially identical ionization states for the cardiolipin phosphates in phospholipid liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Harayama, T.; Riezman, H. Understanding the diversity of membrane lipid composition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gruner, S.M. Intrinsic curvature hypothesis for biomembrane lipid composition: A role for nonbilayer lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 3665–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oemer, G.; Koch, J.; Wohlfarter, Y.; Alam, M.T.; Lackner, K.; Sailer, S.; Neumann, L.; Lindner, H.H.; Watschinger, K.; Haltmeier, M.; et al. Phospholipid Acyl Chain Diversity Controls the Tissue-Specific Assembly of Mitochondrial Cardiolipins. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 4281–4291.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pennington, E.R.; Funai, K.; Brown, D.A.; Shaikh, S.R. The role of cardiolipin concentration and acyl chain composition on mitochondrial inner membrane molecular organization and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2019, 1864, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Siegel, D.P.; Epand, R.M. The mechanism of lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal phase transitions in phosphatidylethanolamine: Implications for membrane fusion mechanisms. Biophys. J. 1997, 73, 3089–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zimmerberg, J. Membrane biophysics. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, R272–R276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kollmitzer, B.; Heftberger, P.; Rappolt, M.; Pabst, G. Monolayer spontaneous curvature of raft-forming membrane lipids. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 10877–10884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ortiz, A.; Killian, J.A.; Verkleij, A.J.; Wilschut, J. Membrane Fusion and the Lamellar-to-Inverted-Hexagonal Phase Transition in Cardiolipin Vesicle Systems Induced by Divalent Cations. Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 2003–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.F.; Tsang, K.Y.; Chang, W.F.; Fan, Z.A. Differential dependencies on [Ca2+] and temperature of the monolayer spontaneous curvatures of DOPE, DOPA and cardiolipin: Effects of modulating the strength of the inter-headgroup repulsion. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 4041–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nichols-Smith, S.; Teh, S.Y.; Kuhl, T. Thermodynamic and mechanical properties of model mitochondrial membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1663, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Òscar, D.; Sanz, F.; Montero, M.T.; Hernández-Borrell, J. Thermodynamic and structural study of the main phospholipid components comprising the mitochondrial inner membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2006, 1758, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sennato, S.; Bordi, F.; Cametti, C.; Coluzza, C.; Desideri, A.; Rufini, S. Evidence of Domain Formation in Cardiolipin—Glycerophospholipid Mixed Monolayers. A Thermodynamic and AFM Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15950–15957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Róg, T.; Martinez-Seara, H.; Munck, N.; Orešič, M.; Karttunen, M.; Vattulainen, I. Role of Cardiolipins in the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane: Insight Gained through Atom-Scale Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 3413–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dahlberg, M.; Maliniak, A. Mechanical Properties of Coarse-Grained Bilayers Formed by Cardiolipin and Zwitterionic Lipids. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1638–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dahlberg, M.; Maliniak, A. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Cardiolipin Bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 11655–11663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Khalifat, N.; Fournier, J.B.; Angelova, M.I.; Puff, N. Lipid packing variations induced by pH in cardiolipin-containing bilayers: The driving force for the cristae-like shape instability. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2011, 1808, 2724–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pöyry, S.; Róg, T.; Karttunen, M.; Vattulainen, I. Mitochondrial Membranes with Mono- and Divalent Salt: Changes Induced by Salt Ions on Structure and Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 15513–15521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wilson, B.A.; Ramanathan, A.; Lopez, C.F. Cardiolipin-Dependent Properties of Model Mitochondrial Membranes from Molecular Simulations. Biophys. J. 2019, 117, 429–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Helfrich, W. Elastic Properties of Lipid Bilayers: Theory and Possible Experiments. Z. FüR Naturforschung 1973, 28, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Unsay, J.D.; Cosentino, K.; Subburaj, Y.; García-Sáez, A.J. Cardiolipin Effects on Membrane Structure and Dynamics. Langmuir 2013, 29, 15878–15887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pan, J.; Cheng, X.; Sharp, M.; Ho, C.S.; Khadka, N.; Katsaras, J. Structural and mechanical properties of cardiolipin lipid bilayers determined using neutron spin echo, small angle neutron and X-ray scattering, and molecular dynamics simulations. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Boscia, A.L.; Treece, B.W.; Mohammadyani, D.; Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Braun, A.R.; Wassenaar, T.A.; Klösgen, B.; Tristram-Nagle, S. X-ray structure, thermodynamics, elastic properties and MD simulations of cardiolipin/dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine mixed membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2014, 178, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rawicz, W.; Olbrich, K.; McIntosh, T.; Needham, D.; Evans, E. Effect of Chain Length and Unsaturation on Elasticity of Lipid Bilayers. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tiberti, M.; Antonny, B.; Gautier, R. The transbilayer distribution of polyunsaturated phospholipids determines their facilitating effect on membrane deformation. Soft Matter 2020, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Boyd, K.; Alder, N.; May, E. Buckling Under Pressure: Curvature Based Lipid Segregation and Stability Modulation in Cardiolipin Containing Bilayers. Langmuir 2017, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Beltrán-Heredia, E.; Tsai, F.C.; Salinas-Almaguer, S.; Cao, F.J.; Bassereau, P.; Monroy, F. Membrane curvature induces cardiolipin sorting. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Rand, R.; Sengupta, S. Cardiolipin forms hexagonal structures with divalent cations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1972, 255, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cullis, P.; Verkleij, A.; Ververgaert, P. Polymorphic phase behaviour of cardiolipin as detected by 31P NMR and freeze-fracture techniques. Effects of calcium, dibucaine and chlorpromazine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1978, 513, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. de Kruijff, B.; Verkleij, A.; Leunissen-Bijvelt, J.; van Echteld, C.; Hille, J.; Rijnbout, H. Further aspects of the Ca2+-dependent polymorphism of bovine heart cardiolipin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1982, 693, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  84. Fox, C.A.; Ellison, P.; Ikon, N.; Ryan, R.O. Calcium-induced transformation of cardiolipin nanodisks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2019, 1861, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Seddon, J.M.; Kaye, R.; Marsh, D. Induction of the lamellar-inverted hexagonal phase transition in cardiolipin by protons and monovalent cations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1983, 734, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khalifat, N.; Puff, N.; Bonneau, S.; Fournier, J.B.; Angelova, M.I. Membrane Deformation under Local pH Gradient: Mimicking Mitochondrial Cristae Dynamics. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 4924–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Khalifat, N.; Rahimi, M.; Bitbol, A.F.; Seigneuret, M.; Fournier, J.B.; Puff, N.; Arroyo, M.; Angelova, M.I. Interplay of Packing and Flip-flop in Local Bilayer Deformation. How Phosphatidylglycerol Could Rescue Mitochondrial Function in a Cardiolipin-deficient Yeast Mutant. Biophys. J. 2014, 107, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fournier, J.B.; Khalifat, N.; Puff, N.; Angelova, M.I. Chemically Triggered Ejection of Membrane Tubules Controlled by Intermonolayer Friction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 018102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bitbol, A.F.; Puff, N.; Sakuma, Y.; Imai, M.; Fournier, J.B.; Angelova, M.I. Lipid membrane deformation in response to a local pH modification: Theory and experiments. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 6073–6082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bitbol, A.F.; Fournier, J.B. Membrane properties revealed by spatiotemporal response to a local inhomogeneity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Bitbol, A.F.; Fournier, J.B.; Angelova, M.; Puff, N. Dynamical membrane curvature instability controlled by intermonolayer friction. J. Physics. Condens. Matter Inst. Phys. J. 2011, 23, 284102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Song, D.H.; Park, J.; Philbert, M.A.; Sastry, A.M.; Lu, W. Effects of local pH on the formation and regulation of cristae morphologies. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2014, 90, 022702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rieger, B.; Junge, W.; Busch, K.B. Lateral pH gradient between OXPHOS complex IV and F0F1 ATP-synthase in folded mitochondrial membranes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Patil, N.; Bonneau, S.; Joubert, F.; Bitbol, A.F.; Berthoumieux, H. Mitochondrial cristae modeled as an out-of-equilibrium membrane driven by a proton field. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 102, 022401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. van Meer, G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Planas-Iglesias, J.; Dwarakanath, H.; Mohammadyani, D.; Yanamala, N.; Kagan, V.E.; Klein-Seetharaman, J. Cardiolipin Interactions with Proteins. Biophys. J. 2015, 109, 1282–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Musatov, A.; Sedlák, E. Role of cardiolipin in stability of integral membrane proteins. Biochimie 2017, 142, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Beales, P.A.; Bergstrom, C.L.; Geerts, N.; Groves, J.T.; Vanderlick, T.K. Single Vesicle Observations of the Cardiolipin—Cytochrome c Interaction: Induction of Membrane Morphology Changes. Langmuir 2011, 27, 6107–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bergstrom, C.L.; Beales, P.A.; Lv, Y.; Vanderlick, T.K.; Groves, J.T. Cytochrome c causes pore formation in cardiolipin-containing membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6269–6274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pennington, R.; Sullivan, E.; Fix, A.; Dadoo, S.; Zeczycki, T.; DeSantis, A.; Schlattner, U.; Coleman, R.; Chicco, A.; Brown, D.; et al. Proteolipid domains form in biomimetic and cardiac mitochondrial vesicles and are regulated by cardiolipin concentration but not monolyso-cardiolipin. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 15933–15946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Acehan, D.; Malhotra, A.; Xu, Y.; Ren, M.; Stokes, D.; Schlame, M. Cardiolipin Affects the Supramolecular Organization of ATP Synthase in Mitochondria. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 2184–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gasanov, S.E.; Kim, A.A.; Yaguzhinsky, L.S.; Dagda, R.K. Non-bilayer structures in mitochondrial membranes regulate ATP synthase activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2018, 1860, 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bazan, S.; Mileykovskaya, E.; Mallampalli, V.; Heacock, P.; Sparagna, G.; Dowhan, W. Cardiolipin-dependent Reconstitution of Respiratory Supercomplexes from Purified Saccharomyces cerevisiae Complexes III and IV. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Szeto, H. First-in-class cardiolipin-protective compound as a therapeutic agent to restore mitochondrial bioenergetics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cooke, I.R.; Deserno, M. Coupling between Lipid Shape and Membrane Curvature. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Baoukina, S.; Ingólfsson, H.; Marrink, S.; Tieleman, D. Curvature-Induced Sorting of Lipids in Plasma Membrane Tethers. Adv. Theory Simul. 2018, 1, 1800034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Elías-Wolff, F.; Lindén, M.; Lyubartsev, A.P.; Brandt, E.G. Curvature sensing by cardiolipin in simulated buckled membranes. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kamal, M.M.; Mills, D.; Grzybek, M.; Howard, J. Measurement of the membrane curvature preference of phospholipids reveals only weak coupling between lipid shape and leaflet curvature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 22245–22250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tian, A.; Baumgart, T. Sorting of Lipids and Proteins in Membrane Curvature Gradients. Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 2676–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sorre, B.; Callan-Jones, A.; Manzi, J.; Goud, B.; Prost, J.; Bassereau, P.; Roux, A. Nature of curvature coupling of amphiphysin with membranes depends on its bound density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Prévost, C.; Zhao, H.; Manzi, J.; Lemichez, E.; Lappalainen, P.; Callan-Jones, A.; Bassereau, P. IRSp53 senses negative membrane curvature and phase separates along membrane tubules. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sorre, B.; Callan-Jones, A.; Manneville, J.B.; Nassoy, P.; Joanny, J.F.; Prost, J.; Goud, B.; Bassereau, P. Curvature-driven lipid sorting needs proximity to a demixing point and is aided by proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5622–5626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Callan-Jones, A.; Bassereau, P. Curvature-driven membrane lipid and protein distribution. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2013, 17, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Krebs, J.; Hauser, H.; Carafoli, E. Asymmetric distribution of phospholipids in the inner mitochondrial membrane of beef heart mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 5308–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Harb, J.S.; Comte, J.; Gautheron, D.C. Asymmetrical orientation of phospholipids and their interactions with marker enzymes in pig heart mitochondrial inner membrane. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1981, 208, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cheneval, D.; Müller, M.; Toni, R.; Ruetz, S.; Carafoli, E. Adriamycin as a probe for the transversal distribution of cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 13003–13007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Petit, J.M.; Huet, O.; Gallet, P.F.; Maftah, A.; Ratinaud, M.H.; Julien, R. Direct analysis and significance of cardiolipin transverse distribution in mitochondrial inner membranes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 220, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gallet, P.F.; Petit, J.M.; Maftah, A.; Zachowski, A.; Julien, R. Asymmetrical distribution of cardiolipin in yeast inner mitochondrial membrane triggered by carbon catabolite repression. Biochem. J. 1997, 324, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gallet, P.F.; Zachowski, A.; Julien, R.; Fellmann, P.; Devaux, P.F.; Maftah, A. Transbilayer movement and distribution of spin-labelled phospholipids in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1999, 1418, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  120. Jacobson, J.; Duchen, M.; Heales, S. Intracellular distribution of the fluorescent dye nonyl acridine orange responds to the mitochondrial membrane potential: Implications for assays of cardiolipin and mitochondrial mass. J. Neurochem. 2002, 82, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gohil, V.; Gvozdenovic-Jeremic, J.; Schlame, M.; Greenberg, M. Binding of 10-N-nonyl acridine orange to cardiolipin-deficient yeast cells: Implications for assay of cardiolipin. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 343, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kagan, V.; Chu, C.; Tyurina, Y.; Cheikhi, A.; Bayir, H. Cardiolipin asymmetry, oxidation and signaling. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2013, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Schlattner, U.; Tokarska-Schlattner, M.; Rousseau, D.; Boissan, M.; Mannella, C.; Epand, R.; Lacombe, M.L. Mitochondrial cardiolipin/phospholipid trafficking: The role of membrane contact site complexes and lipid transfer proteins. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2014, 179, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Huang, K.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Wingreen, N. A Curvature-Mediated Mechanism for Localization of Lipids to Bacterial Poles. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2, e151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Elmer-Dixon, M.M.; Hoody, J.; Steele, H.B.B.; Becht, D.C.; Bowler, B.E. Cardiolipin Preferentially Partitions to the Inner Leaflet of Mixed Lipid Large Unilamellar Vesicles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 9111–9122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tasseva, G.; Bai, H.D.; Davidescu, M.; Haromy, A.; Michelakis, E.; Vance, J.E. Phosphatidylethanolamine Deficiency in Mammalian Mitochondria Impairs Oxidative Phosphorylation and Alters Mitochondrial Morphology*. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 4158–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Baker, C.; Basu Ball, W.; Pryce, E.; Gohil, V. Specific Requirements of Non-bilayer Phospholipids in Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Function and Formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2016, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. van der Veen, J.; Kennelly, J.; Wan, S.; Vance, J.; Vance, D.; Jacobs, R. The Critical Role of Phosphatidylcholine and Phosphatidylethanolamine Metabolism in Health and Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2017, 1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Heden, T.D.; Johnson, J.M.; Ferrara, P.J.; Eshima, H.; Verkerke, A.R.P.; Wentzler, E.J.; Siripoksup, P.; Narowski, T.M.; Coleman, C.B.; Lin, C.T.; et al. Mitochondrial PE potentiates respiratory enzymes to amplify skeletal muscle aerobic capacity. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bashkirov, P.V.; Chekashkina, K.V.; Akimov, S.A.; Kuzmin, P.I.; Frolov, V.A. Variation of lipid membrane composition caused by strong bending. Biochem. (Moscow) Suppl. Ser. A Membr. Cell Biol. 2011, 5, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, H.Y.; Bharti, D.; Levental, I. Membrane Heterogeneity Beyond the Plasma Membrane. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mileykovskaya, E.; Dowhan, W. Visualization of Phospholipid Domains inEscherichia coli by Using the Cardiolipin-Specific Fluorescent Dye 10-N-Nonyl Acridine Orange. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Koppelman, C.M.; Den Blaauwen, T.; Duursma, M.C.; Heeren, R.M.A.; Nanninga, N. Escherichia coli Minicell Membranes Are Enriched in Cardiolipin. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 6144–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kawai, F.; Shoda, M.; Harashima, R.; Sadaie, Y.; Hara, H.; Matsumoto, K. Cardiolipin Domains in Bacillus subtilis Marburg Membranes. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 1475–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Romantsov, T.; Helbig, S.; Culham, D.E.; Gill, C.; Stalker, L.; Wood, J.M. Cardiolipin promotes polar localization of osmosensory transporter ProP in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 1455–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Mileykovskaya, E. Subcellular localization of Escherichia coli osmosensory transporter ProP: Focus on cardiolipin membrane domains. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 1419–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Huang, K.C.; Wingreen, N.S. Lipid Localization in Bacterial Cells through Curvature-Mediated Microphase Separation. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 1034–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Renner, L.D.; Weibel, D.B. Cardiolipin microdomains localize to negatively curved regions of Escherichia coli membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6264–6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Jalmar, O.; García-Sáez, A.J.; Berland, L.; Gonzalvez, F.; Petit, P.X. Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) as a new tool for analysis of caspase-8/Bid-FL complex binding to cardiolipin and its functional activity. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1, e103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kawai, C.; Ferreira, J.C.; Baptista, M.S.; Nantes, I.L. Not Only Oxidation of Cardiolipin Affects the Affinity of Cytochrome c for Lipid Bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 11863–11872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cheniour, M.; Brewer, J.; Bagatolli, L.; Marcillat, O.; Granjon, T. Evidence of proteolipid domain formation in an inner mitochondrial membrane mimicking model. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tomšiè, N.; Babnik, B.; Lombardo, D.; Mavčič, B.; Kandušer, M.; Iglič, A.; Kralj-Iglič, V. Shape and Size of Giant Unilamellar Phospholipid Vesicles Containing Cardiolipin. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1676–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Domènech, O.; Redondo, L.; Picas, L.; Morros, A.; Montero, M.T.; Hernández-Borrell, J. Atomic force microscopy characterization of supported planar bilayers that mimic the mitochondrial inner membrane. J. Mol. Recognit. 2007, 20, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lopes, S.; Ivanova, G.; de Castro, B.; Gameiro, P. Revealing cardiolipins influence in the construction of a significant mitochondrial membrane model. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2018, 1860, 2465–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Jouhet, J. Importance of the hexagonal lipid phase in biological membrane organization. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Schlame, M.; Ren, M. Barth syndrome, a human disorder of cardiolipin metabolism. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 5450–5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ohtsuka, T.; Nishijima, M.; Suzuki, K.; Akamatsu, Y. Mitochondrial dysfunction of a cultured Chinese hamster ovary cell mutant deficient in cardiolipin. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 22914–22919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Basu Ball, W.; Neff, J.K.; Gohil, V.M. The role of nonbilayer phospholipids in mitochondrial structure and function. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Griffiths, E.J.; Balaska, D.; Cheng, W.H. The ups and downs of mitochondrial calcium signalling in the heart. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2010, 1797, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Mannella, C.A. Consequences of Folding the Mitochondrial Inner Membrane. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Heberle, J.; Riesle, J.; Thiedemann, G.; Oesterhelt, D.; Dencher, N.A. Proton migration along the membrane surface and retarded surface to bulk transfer. Nature 1994, 370, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ferguson, S.J. Chemiosmotic Coupling: Protons fast and slow. Curr. Biol. 1995, 5, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yoshinaga, M.Y.; Kellermann, M.Y.; Valentine, D.L.; Valentine, R.C. Phospholipids and glycolipids mediate proton containment and circulation along the surface of energy-transducing membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016, 64, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Morelli, A.; Ravera, S.; Calzia, D.; Panfoli, I. An update of the chemiosmotic theory as suggested by possible proton currents inside the coupling membrane. Open Biol. 2019, 9, 180221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Toth, A.; Meyrat, A.; Stoldt, S.; Santiago, R.; Wenzel, D.; Jakobs, S.; von Ballmoos, C.; Ott, M. Kinetic coupling of the respiratory chain with ATP synthase, but not proton gradients, drives ATP production in cristae membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 2412–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Haines, T.H.; Dencher, N.A. Cardiolipin: A proton trap for oxidative phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2002, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.