Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification

A special issue of Veterinary Sciences (ISSN 2306-7381). This special issue belongs to the section "Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2022) | Viewed by 17248

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Center of Excellence for Emerging and Zoonotic Animal Disease (CEEZAD) and the Center of Excellence for Emerging and Zoonotic Animal Disease (CEEZAD), College of Veterinary Medicine Diagnostic Medicine/ Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Interests: high consequence animal and zoonotic pathogens; immunology and pathology; the pathogenesis of infectious agents; vaccine and diagnostic assay development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Reagents and Vaccine Services Section, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, P.O. Box 848, Greenport, NY 11944, USA
Interests: bioinformatics; molecular diagnostic assays; multiplex conventional and real time PCR; DIVA; PCR inhibition/nucleic acid extractions; host-pathogen (virus) interactions; NGS; in-situ (DNA) hybridization; protein purification and characterization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Rapid and sensitive diagnostic assays are key to surveillance, control and prevention of animal diseases. Failure of rapid diagnosis often results in disease outbreaks, which can be economically devastating for highly contagious transboundary animal diseases, for example, foot-and-mouth disease, classical swine fever and African swine fever, when slaughtering of the infected animals remains the only option to prevent the spread of the disease. Therefore, timely detection of the pathogen at the onset of the disease (pre-clinical) is extremely important.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely used as one of the point of care (PC) diagnostic tools for sensitive and rapid detection of animal pathogens and, in theory, it has the ability to detect a single genome (DNA/RNA) copy (bacterium/virus particle) per assay.  Therefore, ideall,y PCR assays can detect pathogens in infected animals at the onset of the disease (pre-clinical). One of the challenges of PCR-based diagnosis is the false negatives (failure to detect the pathogens) which often occurs due to PCR inhibition caused by PCR inhibitors. The PCR inhibitors represent a diverse group of substances with different properties and mechanisms of action. Naturally occurring PCR inhibitors constitute various components of body fluids used as clinical specimens, for example, bile salts and complex polysaccharides in feces, heme in blood, glycogen and fats of tissues, proteinases in milk and urea in urine. These substances, if not removed during extractions, are co-purified with the final product (DNA/RNA) and exert their effect (inhibition) on PCR. Many commercially available nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) extraction kits are optimized to improve their capacity to remove PCR inhibitors during extractions, but they are not enough to yield clean template (DNA/RNA) to ensure reliable PCR results.

The aim of this Special Issue is to invite authors to submit original research articles, short reports, or reviews that highlight the current knowledge and latest advances on diagnostic PCR on animal diseases and PCR inhibition. A multiplex assay design with inclusion of an internal positive control (IPC) to detect and monitor the level of PCR inhibitors can be a good strategy.

We invite authors to submit their research papers covering the following or related topics:

  • PCR inhibitors (diversity) and clinical specimens;
  • PCR inhibition and false negative test results;
  • Nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) extractions;
  • Additives, enhancers and treatments that encounter/neutralize PCR inhibition;
  • Inhibitor tolerant DNA polymerases.

Dr. Jessie Trujillo
Dr. Amaresh Das
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Veterinary Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • animal disease and pathogens
  • molecular diagnosis and real-time PCR
  • point of care (POC) diagnosis
  • nucleic acids extractions
  • PCR Inhibition and remedy
  • thermostable DNA polymerases

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 1268 KiB  
Article
Molecular Identification of Parasitic Protozoa Sarcocystis in Water Samples
by Živilė Strazdaitė-Žielienė, Agnė Baranauskaitė, Dalius Butkauskas, Elena Servienė and Petras Prakas
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(8), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080412 - 5 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
Sarcocystis parasites are among the most common parasitic protozoa in farm animals. So far, the diversity of these parasites has been mainly studied in animal carcasses by morphological or molecular methods. Research on parasitic protozoa in environmental samples is scarce due to the [...] Read more.
Sarcocystis parasites are among the most common parasitic protozoa in farm animals. So far, the diversity of these parasites has been mainly studied in animal carcasses by morphological or molecular methods. Research on parasitic protozoa in environmental samples is scarce due to the lack of an appropriate methodology and low concentrations of parasites. For these reasons, there is a paucity of validated methods for Sarcocystis identification from environmental samples. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate various molecular methods for Sarcocystis parasite identification in water samples. In the present study, the sample volume, sporocysts isolation, and various conventional PCR were evaluated, and species-specific primers for the identification of different Sarcocystis species have been developed. Of the methods studied, based on data the most appropriate method for the identification of analyzed Sarcocystis spp. in water bodies is nested PCR, using species-specific primers targeting the cox1 gene. Sarcocystis DNA was detected in 111 out of 114 (97.4%) samples. This paper represents the first identification of S. bovifelis, S. cruzi, S. hirsuta, S. arieticanis, S. tenella, S. capracanis, S. bertrami, and S. miescheriana by PCR and sequencing in environmental water samples. Our pilot study is useful in developing techniques for the identification of Sarcocystis species from water samples. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 922 KiB  
Communication
Development of Nested PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and Its Application for Diagnosis of Active Infection in Cats
by Ivo Sirakov, Ralitsa Popova-Ilinkina, Dobrinka Ivanova, Nikolina Rusenova, Hristiyan Mladenov, Kalina Mihova and Ivan Mitov
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(6), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9060272 - 5 Jun 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2769
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 emerged in 2019 and found diagnostic laboratories unprepared worldwide. To meet the need for timely and accurate virus detection, laboratories used rapid Ag tests and PCR kits based on costly multi-channel real-time techniques. This study aimed to develop a conventional nested PCR [...] Read more.
SARS-CoV-2 emerged in 2019 and found diagnostic laboratories unprepared worldwide. To meet the need for timely and accurate virus detection, laboratories used rapid Ag tests and PCR kits based on costly multi-channel real-time techniques. This study aimed to develop a conventional nested PCR based on the SARS-CoV-2 N gene, validate it against some approved assays, and apply it to samples from six cats with respiratory symptoms obtained in early 2020 during the first COVID-19 wave in humans in Bulgaria. The nested PCR technique showed 100% sensitivity and specificity; it could detect extracted SARS-CoV-2 RNA at concentrations as low as 0.015 ng/μL. The results identified the six tested cat samples as positive. Sequence analysis performed in two of them confirmed this. The presented technique is reliable, easy to implement and inexpensive, and can be successful in strategies for the prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 in humans, cats and other susceptible species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 251 KiB  
Article
The Importance of Complementary PCR Analysis in Addition to Serological Testing for the Detection of Transmission Sources of Brucella spp. in Greek Ruminants
by Anthimia Batrinou, Irini F. Strati, Andreas G. Tsantes, Joseph Papaparaskevas, Ioannis Dimou, Dimitrios Vourvidis, Anna Kyrma, Dionysis Antonopoulos, Panagiotis Halvatsiotis and Dimitra Houhoula
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(4), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9040193 - 17 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2786
Abstract
The early and accurate diagnosis of brucellosis, a ubiquitous zoonotic infection, is significant in preventing disease transmission. This study aimed to assess the infection rate of Brucella spp. in ruminants and to evaluate the agreement between a serological test and a molecular method [...] Read more.
The early and accurate diagnosis of brucellosis, a ubiquitous zoonotic infection, is significant in preventing disease transmission. This study aimed to assess the infection rate of Brucella spp. in ruminants and to evaluate the agreement between a serological test and a molecular method for the detection of infected cases. Blood and milk samples of 136 ruminants were analyzed using two laboratory methods: the Rose Bengal plate (RBP) test to detect B. abortus and B. melitensis antibodies and the molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the presence of bacterial DNA. The agreement between the methods was assessed using the kappa statistic. Based on the RBP test, there were 12 (8.8%) seropositive animals (10 sheep and 2 cows), while 2 (1.4%) samples were positive on PCR analysis. The positive PCR samples were from seronegative cow samples on RBP testing. There was slight agreement (k = −0.02) between the two methods, which was not statistically significant. Our results indicate that complementary molecular methods are useful to detect the bacteria in infected animals that are seronegative due to an early stage of infection. Therefore, a combination of molecular methods and serological tests can be applied to detect brucellosis in ruminants efficiently. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification)
13 pages, 1491 KiB  
Article
Development of a Multiplex RT-PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Four Potential Zoonotic Swine RNA Viruses
by Gebremeskel Mamu Werid, He Zhang, Yassein M. Ibrahim, Yu Pan, Lin Zhang, Yunfei Xu, Wenli Zhang, Wei Wang, Hongyan Chen, Lizhi Fu and Yue Wang
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(4), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9040176 - 7 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2826
Abstract
Swine viruses like porcine sapovirus (SaV), porcine encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), porcine rotavirus A (RVA) and porcine astroviruses (AstV) are potentially zoonotic viruses or suspected of potential zoonosis. These viruses have been detected in pigs with or without clinical signs and often occur as [...] Read more.
Swine viruses like porcine sapovirus (SaV), porcine encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), porcine rotavirus A (RVA) and porcine astroviruses (AstV) are potentially zoonotic viruses or suspected of potential zoonosis. These viruses have been detected in pigs with or without clinical signs and often occur as coinfections. Despite the potential public health risks, no assay for detecting them all at once has been developed. Hence, in this study, a multiplex RT-PCR (mRT-PCR) assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of SaV, EMCV, RVA and AstV from swine fecal samples. The PCR parameters were optimized using specific primers for each target virus. The assay’s sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and application to field samples have been evaluated. Using a pool of plasmids containing the respective viral target fragments as a template, the developed mRT-PCR successfully detected 2.5 × 103 copies of each target virus. The assay’s specificity was tested using six other swine viruses as a template and did not show any cross-reactivity. A total of 280 field samples were tested with the developed mRT-PCR assay. Positive rates for SaV, EMCV, RVA, and AstV were found to be 24.6% (69/280), 5% (14/280), 4.3% (12/280), and 17.5% (49/280), respectively. Compared to performing separate assays for each virus, this mRT-PCR assay is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for detecting mixed or single infections of SaV, EMCV, RVA, and AstV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 344 KiB  
Review
Current and Future Molecular Diagnostics of Tick-Borne Diseases in Cattle
by Kathryn Garcia, Mina Weakley, Tram Do and Sheema Mir
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(5), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050241 - 21 May 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4040
Abstract
Ticks and tick-borne diseases such as babesiosis, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis, Lyme disease, Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Rocky Mountain spotted fever pose a significant threat to animal and human health. Tick-borne diseases cause billions of dollars of losses to livestock farmers annually. These losses [...] Read more.
Ticks and tick-borne diseases such as babesiosis, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis, Lyme disease, Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Rocky Mountain spotted fever pose a significant threat to animal and human health. Tick-borne diseases cause billions of dollars of losses to livestock farmers annually. These losses are partially attributed to the lack of sensitive, robust, cost effective and efficient diagnostic approaches that could detect the infectious pathogen at the early stages of illness. The modern nucleic acid-based multiplex diagnostic approaches have been developed in human medicine but are still absent in veterinary medicine. These powerful assays can screen 384 patient samples at one time, simultaneously detect numerous infectious pathogens in each test sample and provide the diagnostic answer in a few hours. Development, commercialization, and wide use of such high throughput multiplex molecular assays in the cattle tick-borne disease surveillance will help in early detection and control of infectious pathogens in the animal reservoir before community spread and spillover to humans. Such approaches in veterinary medicine will save animal life, prevent billions of dollars of economic loss to cattle herders and reduce unwanted stress to both human and animal health care systems. This literature review provides recent updates on molecular diagnostics of tick-borne pathogens and discusses the importance of modern nucleic acid high throughput multiplex diagnostic approaches in the prevention of tick-borne infection to livestock. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic PCR on Animal Diseases: From Extraction to Amplification)
Back to TopTop