Innovations in Affordable Housing at the Nexus of the Market and the State

A special issue of Urban Science (ISSN 2413-8851).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2019) | Viewed by 39371

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of City and Regional Planning, Knowlton School of Architecture, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Interests: housing mobility and location choice; affordable housing policy; housing as a poverty alleviation strategy; equity impacts of economic development; urban and regional disparity

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Interests: housing affordability; assisted rental housing policy; public housing authorities; housing challenges of older adults; suburban neighborhood change and reinvestment

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Resources generate affordable housing in the urban environment in two ways: Through some sort of public support or market processes. The results are demand side programs that provide increased purchasing power to households, or units of housing constructed, renovated, or developed by public, non-profit, or private market actors. Since the last part of the 20th century, a shift has occurred in Western countries, transitioning from public support through a welfare state to a neoliberal emphasis, which leverages market-based assets, actors, and techniques to provide affordable housing. The results of such policy change are difficult to measure. In the US, this change has meant that a number of public housing authorities are seeking to re-structure ownership of their public housing, either through formal programs like the Residential Assistance Demonstration (RAD) or through their own asset management strategies. In some European countries, formerly government-supported housing organizations have to act within the market to deliver on their affordable housing mission without robust financial support. With a retrenchment in country-level support, both public and non-profit housing providers are becoming mission-driven organizations with characteristics of public, nonprofit, and private sector organizations. Authors refer to these organizations as hybrids (Billis 2010, Hoffman and Badiane 2012, Nguyen et al. 2012, Smith and Skelcher 2014, Skelcher and Smith 2015). While most authors discuss non-profit or third-sector organizations becoming hybrids (Billis 2010, Smith and Skelcher 2014), authors in the U.S. suggest that quasi-public public housing authorities are also becoming hybrids as they employ private sector methods and financing to meet their public missions (Nguyen et al. 2012). Furthermore, Czischke et al. (2012) go further, arguing that European social housing organizations are beginning to act like social enterprises, which they conceptualize as hybrid entities of varying legal forms that act in accordance to the competing interests of public, market, and community forces and values. This stance at the nexus of these rival interests causes them to take actions that may be entrepreneurial rather than “bureaucratic”, (Czischke et al. 2012, 428) and “conflicts between principles are played out in organizational strategies and day-to-day decisions” (Czischke et al. 2012, 428). As these on-the-ground decisions occur, project by project, understanding the results of these changes for the supply, quality, and accessibility of affordable housing in urban regions becomes challenging.

This Special Issue of Urban Science will contribute to this international literature. We seek papers examining the delivery of affordable housing, including but not limited to, the how housing providers are changing within this neoliberal context, the continuing measurement or impacts of such changes on the supply of housing and its residents, the innovations that are occurring, and recommendations for future action, as well as other related topics. While we seek papers based in a Western context, such efforts also occur in the global south and we welcome these as well.

Prof. Dr. Rachel Garshick Kleit
Dr. Whitney Airgood-Obrycki
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Urban Science is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 3217 KiB  
Article
Homeless Interactions with the Built Environment: A Spatial Pattern Language of Abandoned Housing
by Abram Kaplan, Kim Diver, Karl Sandin and Sarah Kafer Mill
Urban Sci. 2019, 3(2), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020065 - 25 Jun 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 7258
Abstract
Research demonstrates that homeless individuals use urban space in adaptive and endemic ways. Investigations at city and neighborhood scales would benefit from attention to homeless use of abandoned housing. We employ the pattern language approach developed by Christopher Alexander for twenty-two abandoned houses [...] Read more.
Research demonstrates that homeless individuals use urban space in adaptive and endemic ways. Investigations at city and neighborhood scales would benefit from attention to homeless use of abandoned housing. We employ the pattern language approach developed by Christopher Alexander for twenty-two abandoned houses in Newark, Ohio. We use statistical and geospatial data analyses to evaluate hypotheses related to prospect and refuge site qualities, accessibility, and attractiveness to homeless persons, and the proximity of sites to resources. Factors related to prospect/refuge, accessibility, and resource proximity were consistent with the hypotheses. Results can be grouped into four distinct patterns: ‘Hiding Places,’ ‘Welcome Mat,’ ‘Shelter (Un)becoming,’ and ‘Proximity to Resources.’ Based on these patterns, we conclude with recommendations for officials and organizations addressing homelessness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 560 KiB  
Article
Innovative Arrangements between Public and Private Actors in Affordable Housing Provision: Examples from Austria, England and Italy
by Gerard van Bortel and Vincent Gruis
Urban Sci. 2019, 3(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020052 - 8 May 2019
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6743
Abstract
Affordable housing is increasingly developed, financed and managed by a mix of state, third-sector, market and community actors. This has led to the emergence of various hybrid governance and finance arrangements. This development can be seen as part of a general long-term neoliberal [...] Read more.
Affordable housing is increasingly developed, financed and managed by a mix of state, third-sector, market and community actors. This has led to the emergence of various hybrid governance and finance arrangements. This development can be seen as part of a general long-term neoliberal trend in government policies, and social, cultural and economic developments. It is therefore likely that the hybridity and variety of governance and finance of affordable housing will continue to grow. This article discusses innovative hybrid arrangements from Austria, England and Italy, in which governments, private and non-profit actors collaborate to increase the supply of affordable housing. These cases illustrate how the provision of affordable housing in a neoliberal context can benefit from the involvement of market actors and communities. Nevertheless, they also show that governments continue to play a crucial role in initiating and facilitating these arrangements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 517 KiB  
Article
Accessory Dwelling Units as Low-Income Housing: California’s Faustian Bargain
by Darrel Ramsey-Musolf
Urban Sci. 2018, 2(3), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030089 - 18 Sep 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 9754
Abstract
In 2003, California allowed cities to count accessory dwelling units (ADU) towards low-income housing needs. Unless a city’s zoning code regulates the ADU’s maximum rent, occupancy income, and/or effective period, then the city may be unable to enforce low-income occupancy. After examining a [...] Read more.
In 2003, California allowed cities to count accessory dwelling units (ADU) towards low-income housing needs. Unless a city’s zoning code regulates the ADU’s maximum rent, occupancy income, and/or effective period, then the city may be unable to enforce low-income occupancy. After examining a stratified random sample of 57 low-, moderate-, and high-income cities, the high-income cities must proportionately accommodate more low-income needs than low-income cities. By contrast, low-income cities must quantitatively accommodate three times the low-income needs of high-income cities. The sample counted 750 potential ADUs as low-income housing. Even though 759 were constructed, no units were identified as available low-income housing. In addition, none of the cities’ zoning codes enforced low-income occupancy. Inferential tests determined that cities with colleges and high incomes were more probable to count ADUs towards overall and low-income housing needs. Furthermore, a city’s count of potential ADUs and cities with high proportions of renters maintained positive associations with ADU production, whereas a city’s density and prior compliance with state housing laws maintained negative associations. In summary, ADUs did increase local housing inventory and potential ADUs were positively associated with ADU production, but ADUs as low-income housing remained a paper calculation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 414 KiB  
Essay
Human Ecology and Its Influence in Urban Theory and Housing Policy in the United States
by Ivis García
Urban Sci. 2019, 3(2), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020056 - 22 May 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 14954
Abstract
Human ecology, a stream of planning, was developed by Park, Burgess, and Hoyt. This theoretical model emphasized mobility and assimilation as natural paths to housing. This essay offers an analysis of its influence on urban theory and policymaking in the United States. Using [...] Read more.
Human ecology, a stream of planning, was developed by Park, Burgess, and Hoyt. This theoretical model emphasized mobility and assimilation as natural paths to housing. This essay offers an analysis of its influence on urban theory and policymaking in the United States. Using planning-specific analyses, the author interrogates the relationships between structural and ecological interpretations of urban change within early planning theory. A particular focus is given to housing policies and models such as tipping point, segregation, and gentrification. These human ecological interpretations inspired and shaped urban renewal and redlining practices, along with public and affordable housing in the United States. The essay concludes with a criticism of the ecological ideas of spontaneous order and the claims of naturally balancing economic systems and conceptions of personal responsibility and choice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop