Urban Governance in the 21st Century: Emerging Models and Challenges

A special issue of Urban Science (ISSN 2413-8851). This special issue belongs to the section "Urban Economy and Industry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2026 | Viewed by 1497

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Public Policy and Administration, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Interests: entrepreneurship; small business development policy; regional economic health, performance, and development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Government, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Interests: local governance; business-government relations; digital governance; public private partnership

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite submissions to this Special Issue on "Urban Governance in the 21st Century: Emerging Models and Challenges," which seeks to explore how cities and urban institutions are adapting to changes, disruptions, or transformations across socioeconomic, demographic, political, technological, environmental, and institutional dimensions. We look forward to your contributions and to advancing the conversation on urban governance in the 21st century.

Purpose: The goal of this Special Issue is to advance scholarly understanding of how urban governance is evolving and to provide actionable insights for practitioners and policymakers. By identifying innovative governance models and assessing their capacity to foster resilience, responsiveness, and equity in urban settings, we hope to contribute to a more adaptive and effective urban governance landscape.

Focus: This Special Issue centers on the evolving nature of urban governance in the face of complex, interconnected challenges. From geopolitical conflicts, to climate adaptation, digital transformation, shifting demographics, and institutional reforms, cities are at the forefront of experimentation and innovation. We aim to highlight governance strategies that are flexible, inclusive, and grounded in evidence-based practice. By focusing on innovation, adaptability, and evidence-based practice, our Special Issue invites contributions that transcend political, idealogical, and administraive boundaries and offer insights and recommendations that can resonate with diverse audiences and inform governance practices in varied urban settings.

Relationship with the Existing Literature: This Special Issue builds on a rich body of work in urban studies, planning, public administration, public management, policy analysis, regional science, and economic development. However, it seeks to fill a critical gap by focusing on the dynamic interplay between governance innovation and systemic change. While the existing literature has explored individual aspects—such as smart cities, climate policy, or administrative reform—this Special Issue integrates these threads to offer a holistic view of urban governance under pressure. It also emphasizes the importance of resilience, responsiveness and coproduction, themes that are increasingly vital but often underexplored in governance research.

Scope: We welcome contributions that examine governance mechanisms at various spatial scales, ranging from local jurisdictions to metropolitan areas and to expansive megaregions. We further encourage interdisciplinary approaches alongside insights drawn from a wide range of global contexts. Submissions may include empirical studies, theoretical explorations, and comparative analyses. Topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • Smart city initiatives How do digital technologies reshape urban governance, service delivery, and citizen engagement? What are the risks and opportunities of algorithmic decision-making in public administration?
  • Participatory governance What models of civic participation are most effective in enhancing transparency and accountability? How do marginalized communities engage with urban decision-making processes and co-produce public services with other stakeholders?
  • Intergovernmental coordination How do different levels of government collaborate to address cross-boundary challenges such as housing, transportation, and climate resilience? What institutional arrangements facilitate or hinder coordination?
  • Urban equity What governance strategies promote equitable access to resources, services, and opportunities? How can cities address spatial and social inequalities through policy and planning?
  • Sustainability and climate governance How are cities adapting to climate change through governance innovations? What role do local governments play in advancing global sustainability goals?
  • Performance management and accountability What metrics and evaluation frameworks are used to assess urban governance effectiveness? How do performance systems influence policy outcomes and organizational behavior?
  • Interoperable AI infrastructure What governance frameworks and technical standards are needed to support AI systems that operate seamlessly across agencies, jurisdictions, and platforms? How can cities ensure ethical, secure, and scalable deployment of AI tools while maintaining transparency and public trust?
  • Health disparity and urban health equity How do governance structures influence health outcomes across different urban populations? What policies or interventions can address systemic health inequities related to race, income, geography, or access to care? How can urban governance better integrate public health priorities?
  • Transportation governance and mobility systems How do cities plan, manage, and coordinate transportation infrastructure to meet evolving mobility needs? What governance models support integrated transit systems across jurisdictions? How can transportation policy address issues of accessibility, sustainability, and equity in urban mobility?
  • Public transportation and access How do governance structures shape the planning, funding, and delivery of public transit systems? What strategies improve equitable access to transportation for underserved populations, including low-income communities, seniors, and people with disabilities? What role does transit-oriented development play in expanding access and opportunity?
  • Affordable housing and housing policy What governance strategies effectively address housing affordability and prevent displacement in rapidly urbanizing areas? How do local governments balance development pressures with equitable access to housing? We welcome research on policy tools, zoning reforms, public–private partnerships, and community-led initiatives that expand affordable housing options and promote residential stability.
  • Urban development and economic growth: How do governance strategies influence patterns of urban development and stimulate inclusive economic growth? What roles do land use planning, infrastructure investment, and innovation districts play in shaping competitive and resilient urban economies? We welcome research that explores the intersection of economic policy, spatial development, and governance mechanisms that foster sustainable prosperity

Dr. Shaoming Cheng
Prof. Dr. Junbo Yu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Urban Science is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • urban governance
  • smart cities
  • participatory governance
  • coproduction
  • intergovernmental coordination
  • urban equity
  • sustainability
  • climate governance
  • performance management
  • accountability
  • artificial intelligence (AI)
  • interoperable infrastructure
  • health disparity
  • public health equity
  • transportation policy
  • mobility systems
  • public transit access
  • transit-oriented development
  • affordable housing
  • housing policy
  • land use and zoning reform
  • digital technologies
  • civic engagement
  • cross-jurisdictional collaboration
  • data standards
  • ethical AI
  • urban resilience
  • social determinants of health
  • infrastructure planning
  • equity in service delivery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 2550 KB  
Article
Urban Greenspace Governance in Three Asian Cities—Seoul, Taipei, and Tokyo—from Actor-Centered Power Perspectives
by Lankyung Kim, Chul Jeong and Min-Hui Chang
Urban Sci. 2026, 10(5), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10050269 - 13 May 2026
Viewed by 308
Abstract
This study applies the Actor-Centered Power (ACP) framework to analyze urban green-space governance in three Asian cities, focusing on how power is distributed and exercised among actors in the management of their representative multipurpose parks: Seoul Forest in Seoul, Da’an Forest Park in [...] Read more.
This study applies the Actor-Centered Power (ACP) framework to analyze urban green-space governance in three Asian cities, focusing on how power is distributed and exercised among actors in the management of their representative multipurpose parks: Seoul Forest in Seoul, Da’an Forest Park in Taipei, and Yoyogi Park in Tokyo. Conventionally used in large-scale forest governance in the Global South, ACP is extended here to East Asian cities of the Global North. This can provide nascent insight into how coercion, (dis)incentives, and information operate across different institutions. The study found that the initial formation of the parks was driven by potent actors through coercive measures in all three cities. While Seoul maintains centralized statutory governance under the national act, Taipei adopts a decentralized governance model that foregrounds subordinate actors, notably exemplified by the higher education-oriented foundation. This organization promotes citizen science involvement and community-based stewardship. Tokyo, by contrast, uses a public–private partnership model that supports private sector commercial collaboration. This comparative case study demonstrates that the ACP framework is well-suited for analyzing urban green-space governance, as it distinguishes between power subjects (potentates and subordinates) and power sources (coercion, incentives, and information), providing theoretical and managerial implications. Through the lens of the ACP framework, this study argues that distinct institutional arrangements produce divergent power configurations for urban green-space management even within similarly developed urban contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Governance in the 21st Century: Emerging Models and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop