sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Global Social and Environmental Justice: Intersections and Dialogues

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 January 2024) | Viewed by 4533

Special Issue Editor

1. Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
2. Global Urban Studies Program, College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Interests: inequality; poverty; urbanization; migrants; slums; social justice; environmental justice; Global South; Asia; China

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue calls for contributions from a diverse group of international scholars regarding various innovative, theoretical, empirical, and policy studies on social and environmental justice, particularly their intersections, in different local, national, regional, and transnational contexts concerning the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The social dimension of sustainability and its relationship to human rights and environmental justice is often neglected (Atapattu et al. 2021). Scholars have pointed out that currently, the intersection of social and environmental justice is critical, as the two major ecological and social injustice crises (related to the collective experience of COVID-19 and conversations about social/racial inequity) (see Solomonian and Di Ruggiero, 2021, for example). An intersectional framework provides a “pivot” to understanding the underlying reinforcers of identity-based inequalities as well as drivers of differential vulnerabilities (Amorim-Maia et al., 2022). Equally important is the interaction between “different forms of knowing” from the Global South and the Global North and an understanding of non-Western struggles/practices based on “non-Western conceptions of justice, nature, difference, culture and identity” (Álvarez and Brendan, 2020).

The UN SDGs include 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) laid out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by all UN members states in 2015 as an “urgent call for action by all countries–developed and developing–in a global partnership” (sdgs.un.org). The goals recognize the importance of linking goals and actions across social, economic, environmental, and climate arenas by emphasizing that “ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests“ (sdgs.un.org). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 states that “cascading and interlinked crises are putting the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in grave danger, along with humanity’s very own survival” (unstats.un.org) and “The confluence of crises, dominated by COVID-19, climate change, and conflicts, are creating spin-off impacts on food and nutrition, health, education, the environment, and peace and security, and affecting all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)” (unstats.un.org).

Motivated by a reversal of years of progress as we are approaching the halfway point of the 2030 Agenda, this Special Issue calls for contributions from a wide array of scholars which address the ongoing challenges related to the SDGs and the most recent critical/urgent intersectional issues to be addressed. This SI is open to all research articles that can make a creative contribution to the theories/conceptualizations, methodologies/methods, empirical cases, and policies relevant to issues, including but not limited to linking social justice, inequity, and/or poverty with environmental, health, and climate justice; disadvantaged, marginalized, or underprivileged groups and environmental justice; women’s, migrants’, and ethnic or racial minorities’ experience; indigenous knowledge; social, racial, gender inequity; and their intersections with community/social-ecological resilience; and/or sustainable development, in various urban and rural settings and from local to regional scales. We particularly encourage submissions from underrepresented scholars or regions.

References

Álvarez, Lina, and Brendan Coolsaet. 2020. Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A Latin American Perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272

Amorim-Maia, Ana T., Isabelle Anguelovski, Eric Chu and James Connolly. 2022. Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Climate. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053

Atapattu, Sumudu A., Carmen G. Gonzalez, Sara L. Seck. 2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leah Thomas. 2022. The Intersectional Environmentalist: How to Dismantle Systems of Oppression to Protect People + Planet. New York: Voracious.

Lucas Chancel. 2020.Unsustainable inequalities: social justice and the environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Solomonian, Leslie, and Erica Di Ruggiero. 2021. The critical intersection of environmental and social justice: a commentary. Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00686-4

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals

United Nations (UN). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/

Dr. Guo Chen
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social justice, poverty, and inequity
  • environmental, health, and climate justice
  • disadvangated/marginialized/underprivileged populations and vulnerable groups
  • women, migrants, minorities, and indigenous populations
  • social, gender, and racial equity
  • community and social-ecological resilience
  • Sustainable Development
  • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 290 KiB  
Article
Towards Social Justice: Investigating the Role of Labor, Globalization, and Governance in Reducing Socio-Economic Inequality within Post-Communist Countries
by Tamara Maria Nae, Margareta-Stela Florescu and Gabriela-Ioana Bălășoiu
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2234; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062234 - 07 Mar 2024
Viewed by 826
Abstract
In the midst of contemporary global challenges, including the repercussions of the pandemic, geopolitical conflicts, and transitional shifts, a notable surge in attention toward income inequality has materialized, garnering significant focus from both national and international entities. The urgency surrounding this issue is [...] Read more.
In the midst of contemporary global challenges, including the repercussions of the pandemic, geopolitical conflicts, and transitional shifts, a notable surge in attention toward income inequality has materialized, garnering significant focus from both national and international entities. The urgency surrounding this issue is amplified by the imperative need for economic sustainability, recognizing poverty and inequalities as fundamental global security threats. Particularly within Europe, the persistent disparities in living standards, evident across and within countries, serve as potent indicators of enduring poverty and inequality. These concerns underscore potential barriers to the European Union’s pursuit of convergence and cohesion, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which prioritize addressing poverty (SDG 1) and reducing inequalities (SDG 10) for sustainable development. This study aims to scrutinize the dynamics of income inequality, concentrating on post-communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Employing panel data analysis, the research identifies and tests variables influencing income inequality in the region, specifically emphasizing labor market structures, globalization, economic development, and governance mechanisms, which hold particular relevance for the region’s context. The primary findings underscore the potential impact of enhancing these sectors in mitigating income inequality within the specified region. These insights provide a foundation for informed policy-making, presenting opportunities to address and mitigate inequalities effectively. They pave the way for fostering pathways toward greater equality and equitable socio-economic development within post-communist nations, ensuring a more inclusive and sustainable future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Social and Environmental Justice: Intersections and Dialogues)
19 pages, 894 KiB  
Article
Social Empowerment and Its Effect on Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development among Women Entrepreneurs in the Nigerian Agricultural Sector
by Mercy Ejovwokeoghene Ogbari, Flourish Folorunso, Busola Simon-Ilogho, Olufunke Adebayo, Kofoworola Olanrewaju, Joy Efegbudu and Michael Omoregbe
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2225; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062225 - 07 Mar 2024
Viewed by 973
Abstract
Despite the fact that the issue of female poverty is widespread, continuous attempts are made to combat it and advance women’s empowerment. To achieve the goals of sustainable development, such as eradicating poverty, attaining gender equality, promoting good jobs and economic growth, and [...] Read more.
Despite the fact that the issue of female poverty is widespread, continuous attempts are made to combat it and advance women’s empowerment. To achieve the goals of sustainable development, such as eradicating poverty, attaining gender equality, promoting good jobs and economic growth, and eliminating inequities, creative strategies must be developed. This study focused on the Nigerian Youth and Women Farmers Association in order to examine the effect of social empowerment on alleviating poverty in Nigeria’s agricultural sector. Out of the 353 issued questionnaires, 335 were returned and used in this study’s investigation. The structural equation model with partial least squares (SEM-PLS) was used to analyse the acquired data. The results showed an important correlation between social empowerment and reductions in poverty among women working in the agricultural sector. This highlights how crucial it is to work together, provide resources, and extend support in order to empower women socially and foster an atmosphere that supports their social and economic advancement. This research recommends that lawmakers, organisations, and governmental entities actively support the empowerment of women in the agricultural sector in order to encourage sustainable farming practices among female entrepreneurs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Social and Environmental Justice: Intersections and Dialogues)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 10044 KiB  
Article
Refugee and Migrant Integration in Urban Spatial Structures and City Development: Case Study of Busan, South Korea
by Sreenidhi Konduri and In-Hee Lee
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16857; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416857 - 14 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1071
Abstract
With the increasing protracted displacements and overall worldwide migration in recent decades, local integration has been considered a durable solution. Accordingly, global agendas have recommended the inclusion of migrant populations, especially within urban frameworks, as cities have always been deemed as migrant hubs. [...] Read more.
With the increasing protracted displacements and overall worldwide migration in recent decades, local integration has been considered a durable solution. Accordingly, global agendas have recommended the inclusion of migrant populations, especially within urban frameworks, as cities have always been deemed as migrant hubs. This study examines the influence of migrant spatial integration in city development and municipal policy against the historic backdrop of Busan. From liberation (1945) to post-war industrialization (1960s–1980s), Busan experienced population surges with the inflow of refugees and migrants that historically changed government policies and urban development plans. Based on archival research, secondary data, and GIS mapping, this study explores the influence of migrant populations on the city demographics, physical development, and housing initiatives during different periods. The findings of this study highlight the “local turn” in migrant spatial integration and the production of new urban geographies that portray “humanitarian” and “migrant” urbanism, thereby offering insights into sustainable urban futures for migrant and displaced populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Social and Environmental Justice: Intersections and Dialogues)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2505 KiB  
Article
A Model of Build Back Better Utilization: Long-Term Recovery Groups and Post-Disaster Housing Recovery
by Eduardo Landaeta and Jesse Richman
Sustainability 2023, 15(23), 16424; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316424 - 29 Nov 2023
Viewed by 906
Abstract
Housing recovery, especially for vulnerable populations, can be a challenging process. Questions regarding whether to rebuild damaged housing and whether to restore it to its previous state or to build back better must be answered. In the United States, Long-Term Recovery Groups (LTRGs) [...] Read more.
Housing recovery, especially for vulnerable populations, can be a challenging process. Questions regarding whether to rebuild damaged housing and whether to restore it to its previous state or to build back better must be answered. In the United States, Long-Term Recovery Groups (LTRGs) play a crucial role in channeling assistance to vulnerable community members as they embark on housing recovery. However, the experiences of LTRGs have been understudied. To address this gap, the study utilizes interviews with a diverse range of LTRG members and develops an agent-based model following the Overview, Design concepts, and Details (ODD) protocol. The results highlight the consequences of adopting or not adopting a Build Back Better (BBB) approach in post-disaster recovery. Communities do not uniformly adhere to the same reconstruction approach, as evidenced by insights from LTRG interviews. BBB implementation is uneven in US LTRGs. BBB has higher initial costs but lower long-term costs because it increases community resilience and sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Social and Environmental Justice: Intersections and Dialogues)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop