Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention

A special issue of Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247). This special issue belongs to the section "Biopharmaceuticals".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 January 2022) | Viewed by 15850

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 72-74 V. Sofia’s Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece
Interests: headache; migraine; pain; multiple sclerosis; nocebo

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Although largely underestimated and underappreciated, migraine affects more than one billion people across the world [1] and stands as the first cause of disability among all medical conditions in people younger than 50 [2]. Multidisciplinary management limits the burden of migraine significantly; however, that includes medicinal and nonmedicinal treatments as well as symptomatic for the relief of attacks and prophylactic ones for the restriction of the disease by attenuating the frequency and severity of attacks. Depending on the frequency of the attacks, migraine is classified into episodic and chronic subforms. Chronic migraine is characterized by 15 or more headache days per month of which at least 8 days show typical migraine features, and episodic migraine is characterized by less than 15 headache days per month. The development from episodic to chronic migraine, referred to as migraine chronification, is estimated to occur in 2.5% of the patients with episodic migraine annually, but only a few chronic migraine cases revert back to episodic subform [3]. While episodic migraine affects the quality of life significantly, the impact of chronic migraine in daily life is enormous [4]. Thus, one of the migraine treatment milestones refers to the prevention of migraine chronification, because in chronic migraine, all migraine characteristics are considerably enlarged, and the condition evolves into a difficult-to-treat condition with several comorbidities, including the overuse of symptomatic medications. Although triptans, disease-specific, and mechanism-based drugs for symptomatic treatment for migraine have been available since the early 1990s, only repurposed drugs were until recently available for prophylactic pharmaceutical treatment, embracing mainly anti-hypertensive, antiepileptic and antidepressant agents. However, these pharmaceutical options often cause low adherence due to safety reasons [5]. The scene changed dramatically with the introduction of novel pharmaceutical treatments targeting the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), either as small molecules that penetrate the blood–brain barrier, i.e., so-called gepants, or as large ones, the monoclonal antibodies to CGRP ligand and receptor that act peripherally [6]. The therapeutic developments are complemented by new neurostimulation techniques and disease-specific symptomatic drugs, i.e., ditans.

The plethora of the novel antimigraine agents consequently raises questions around prioritizing and practice dilemmas. Eventually, decision making, e.g., choosing the right treatment for the right person, or when and how to escalate the treatment, presupposes a correct and detailed knowledge of the mechanism of action and the efficacy and safety results of clinical trials of each antimigraine agent. Several charities associated to the field have published related recommendations already [7,8], but treating physicians should have a basic knowledge in order to form a personal opinion about their particular patients, who may display a specific clinical picture in a specific context of coherence that imposes specific treatment rules. This is precisely the aim of the present issue, to cover all aspects related to the management of migraine with monoclonal antibodies, in order to help treating physicians to take the correct therapeutic decisions after consulting the patient about their preferences.

References

  1. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 459–480. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X.
  2. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J.; Vos, T.; Jensen, R.; Katsarava, Z. Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: Will health politicians now take notice? Headache Pain 2018, 19, 17. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0846-2.
  3. Torres-Ferrús, M.; Ursitti, F.; Alpuente, A.; Brunello, F.; Chiappino, D.; de Vries, T.; Di Marco, S.; Ferlisi, S.; Guerritore, L.; Gonzalez-Garcia, N.; Gonzalez-Martinez, A.; Khutorov, D.; Kritsilis, M.; Kyrou, A.; Makeeva, T.; Minguez-Olaondo, A.; Pilati, L.; Serrien, A.; Tsurkalenko, O.; Van den Abbeele, D.; van Hoogstraten, W.S.; Lampl, C.; School of Advanced Studies of European Headache Federation (EHF-SAS). From transformation to chronification of migraine: Pathophysiological and clinical aspects. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 42. doi:10.1186/s10194-020-01111-8.
  4. Burch, R.C.; Buse, D.C.; Lipton, R.B. Migraine: Epidemiology, Burden, and Comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019, 37, 631–649. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2019.06.001.
  5. Hepp, Z.; Dodick, D.W.; Varon, S.F.; Gillard, P.; Hansen, R.N.; Devine, E.B. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2015, 35, 478–88. doi:10.1177/0333102414547138.
  6. Charles, A.; Pozo-Rosich, P. Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: A new era in migraine therapy. Lancet 2019, 394, 1765–1774. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32504-8.
  7. Sacco, S.; Bendtsen, L.; Ashina, M.; Reuter, U.; Terwindt, G.; Mitsikostas, D.D.; Martelletti, P. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 6. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y.
  8. American Headache Society. The American Headache Society Position Statement on Integrating New Migraine Treatments into Clinical Practice. Headache 2019, 59, 1–18. doi:10.1111/head.13456.

Prof. Dimos D. Mitsikostas
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pharmaceuticals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

11 pages, 618 KiB  
Review
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) in Migraine Pathogenesis
by Casper Emil Christensen, Messoud Ashina and Faisal Mohammad Amin
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(10), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15101189 - 27 Sep 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2245
Abstract
Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurologic disorder. Advancements in understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are spearheading the effort to introduce disease-specific treatment options. In recent years this effort has largely focused on alteration of endogenous neuropeptide signaling, namely the peptides calcitonin gene-related [...] Read more.
Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurologic disorder. Advancements in understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are spearheading the effort to introduce disease-specific treatment options. In recent years this effort has largely focused on alteration of endogenous neuropeptide signaling, namely the peptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP). Human studies into the pathophysiological underpinnings of CGRP and PACAP in migraine are manifold and here we review the works investigating these neuropeptides in patients suffering from migraine in order to elucidate the background for developing new treatment options for this vastly disabling disorder. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 273 KiB  
Review
The Role of Galcanezumab in Migraine Prevention: Existing Data and Future Directions
by Panagiotis Gklinos and Dimos D. Mitsikostas
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(3), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14030245 - 09 Mar 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2858
Abstract
Galcanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway by targeting the CGRP. Data from four phase-3 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials showed that galcanezumab is superior to placebo in reducing migraine headaches, migraine-specific quality of life, and headache-related disability. [...] Read more.
Galcanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway by targeting the CGRP. Data from four phase-3 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials showed that galcanezumab is superior to placebo in reducing migraine headaches, migraine-specific quality of life, and headache-related disability. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate and did not affect trial completion rates significantly. Along with erenumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, galcanezumab forms a novel class of anti-migraine preventative treatments that is disease-specific and mechanism-based, unlike the standard ones. In addition, galcanezumab has also been shown to be effective in cluster headache, though more clinical trials are required. Overall, galcanezumab is a promising emerging treatment in migraine prophylaxis. However, it needs to be tested in larger clinical trials focused on treatment-resistant migraine. Furthermore, its safety profile, especially its potential association with an increased cardiovascular risk, needs to be established through long-term, real-world data. This review aims to give an overview of its pharmacological properties as well as to report and discuss data from clinical trials and its potential place in headache therapeutics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention)
33 pages, 2479 KiB  
Review
Monoclonal Antibodies as Neurological Therapeutics
by Panagiotis Gklinos, Miranta Papadopoulou, Vid Stanulovic, Dimos D. Mitsikostas and Dimitrios Papadopoulos
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(2), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14020092 - 26 Jan 2021
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 7278
Abstract
Over the last 30 years the role of monoclonal antibodies in therapeutics has increased enormously, revolutionizing treatment in most medical specialties, including neurology. Monoclonal antibodies are key therapeutic agents for several neurological conditions with diverse pathophysiological mechanisms, including multiple sclerosis, migraines and neuromuscular [...] Read more.
Over the last 30 years the role of monoclonal antibodies in therapeutics has increased enormously, revolutionizing treatment in most medical specialties, including neurology. Monoclonal antibodies are key therapeutic agents for several neurological conditions with diverse pathophysiological mechanisms, including multiple sclerosis, migraines and neuromuscular disease. In addition, a great number of monoclonal antibodies against several targets are being investigated for many more neurological diseases, which reflects our advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these diseases. Untangling the molecular mechanisms of disease allows monoclonal antibodies to block disease pathways accurately and efficiently with exceptional target specificity, minimizing non-specific effects. On the other hand, accumulating experience shows that monoclonal antibodies may carry class-specific and target-associated risks. This article provides an overview of different types of monoclonal antibodies and their characteristics and reviews monoclonal antibodies currently in use or under development for neurological disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 1297 KiB  
Perspective
Progress in the Treatment of Migraine Attacks: From Traditional Approaches to Eptinezumab
by Damiana Scuteri and Giacinto Bagetta
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(9), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090924 - 13 Sep 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2490
Abstract
Migraine is the second cause of disability and of lost years of healthy life worldwide. Migraine is characterized by recurrent headache attacks and accompanying disabling symptoms lasting 4–48 h. In episodic migraine, attacks occur in less than 15 days per month and in [...] Read more.
Migraine is the second cause of disability and of lost years of healthy life worldwide. Migraine is characterized by recurrent headache attacks and accompanying disabling symptoms lasting 4–48 h. In episodic migraine, attacks occur in less than 15 days per month and in chronic migraine, in more than 15 monthly days. Whilst successful translation of pharmacological discoveries into efficacious therapeutics has been achieved in the preventative therapy of chronic migraine, treatment of acute migraine suffers the lack of effective advancements. An effective treatment affords complete freedom from pain two hours after therapy and provides the absence of the most bothersome symptom (MBS) associated with migraine after 2 h. However, available anti-migraine abortive treatments for acute attacks do not represent an effective and safe treatment for all the populations treated. In particular, the most used specific treatment is represented by triptans that offer 2-h sustained freedom from pain achieved in 18–50% of patients but they are contraindicated in coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease due to the vasoconstriction at the basis of their pharmacologic action. The most novel therapies, i.e., gepants and ditans, are without sufficient post-marketing data for secure use. Here, an attempt is proposed to analyse the rational basis and evidence in favour of investigating the efficacy and safety in acute migraine attacks of eptinezumab, i.e., monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed towards calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) unique for intravenous infusion administration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop