Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

A special issue of Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607). This special issue belongs to the section "Virology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2022) | Viewed by 40254

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Interests: SARS-CoV-2 infection; opportunistic infections
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

More than a year has passed since the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 entered our lives, causing worldwide grief and economic devastation in the form of COVID-19. The virus made a species jump (spillover) from an animal (bat) to man and that in a short time, in sequential waves, has caused an uncontrolled epidemic that has resulted in 295 million cases worldwide and almost 6 million deaths to date—an apocalyptic scenario caused by a highly contagious disease, which sees governments and experts of all medical disciplines committed to facing a common enemy that continues to claim thousands of victims around the world.

COVID-19 is multifaceted, with a variety of clinical expressions from mild or moderate symptoms that generally heal without the need for any treatment, to more severe and devastating effects, especially in unvaccinated patients over 60, or those who are frail or have other coexisting diseases. It can also seriously affect children, in whom the virus can cause a deadly disease: the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), which is particularly perilous to the pediatric age group. Moreover, long-COVID syndrome is becoming increasingly recognized as a new clinical entity in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

In the therapeutic field, there is still no definitive curative drug. However, monoclonal antibodies are available and new antivirals will soon be commercialized. Several currently available vaccines were manufactured in just 18 months, a unique event in the history of highly prevalent infectious diseases that have plagued humanity. The positive effects of the vaccination campaign are being seen in many parts of the world, with a reduction in admissions to intensive care units and in overall mortality. However, the disappearance of this new infection is still far from being a reality, as it is also threatened by the presence of numerous viral variants that could compromise the efficacy of the vaccine, especially when there are segments of the population not yet immunized.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to focus on the main biological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of the virus, but above all on therapeutic and preventive aspects in the light of the newly acquired knowledge.

Prof. Dr. Carlo Contini
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Microorganisms is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • spillover
  • epidemiology and pathogenesis
  • clinical presentation
  • advanced diagnosis
  • therapeutics
  • vaccines
  • variants
  • long-COVID syndrome
  • opportunistic infections
  • multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C)

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (15 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 203 KiB  
Editorial
Special Issue: Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection
by Carlo Contini, John Charles Rotondo, Benedetta Perna, Matteo Guarino and Roberto De Giorgio
Microorganisms 2023, 11(4), 1048; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11041048 - 17 Apr 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1234
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a life-threatening disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus which was first reported in late 2019 in China, from where it then spread worldwide [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

13 pages, 581 KiB  
Article
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Inappropriate Use of the Emergency Department
by Abelardo Claudio Fernández Chávez, Jesús María Aranaz-Andrés, Miriam Roncal-Redin, Fernando Roldán Moll, María Jesús Estévez Rueda, Patricia Alva García, Yolanda Aranda García, Diego San Jose-Saras and on behalf Health Outcomes Research Group of the Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS)
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020423 - 7 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1684
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate use of the emergency department (IEDU)—consisting of the unnecessary use of the resource by patients with no clinical need—is one of the leading causes of the loss of efficiency of the health system. Specific contexts modify routine clinical practice and [...] Read more.
Background: Inappropriate use of the emergency department (IEDU)—consisting of the unnecessary use of the resource by patients with no clinical need—is one of the leading causes of the loss of efficiency of the health system. Specific contexts modify routine clinical practice and usage patterns. This study aims to analyse the influence of COVID-19 on the IEDU and its causes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department of a high-complexity hospital. The Hospital Emergency Suitability Protocol (HESP) was used to measure the prevalence of IEDU and its causes, comparing three pairs of periods: (1) March 2019 and 2020; (2) June 2019 and 2020; and (3) September 2019 and 2020. A bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for confounding variables, were utilized. Results: In total, 822 emergency visits were included (137 per period). A total prevalence of IEDU of 14.1% was found. There was a significant decrease in IEDU in March 2020 (OR: 0.03), with a prevalence of 0.8%. No differences were found in the other periods. A mistrust in primary care was the leading cause of IEDU (65.1%). Conclusions: The impact of COVID-19 reduced the frequency of IEDU during the period of more significant population restrictions, with IEDU returning to previous levels in subsequent months. Targeted actions in the field of population education and an improvement in primary care are positioned as strategies that could mitigate its impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 678 KiB  
Article
The Immune, Inflammatory and Hematological Response in COVID-19 Patients, According to the Severity of the Disease
by Felicia Trofin, Eduard-Vasile Nastase, Andrei Vâță, Luminița Smaranda Iancu, Cătălina Luncă, Elena Roxana Buzilă, Mădălina Alexandra Vlad and Olivia Simona Dorneanu
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020319 - 27 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2057
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune and inflammatory responses in COVID-19 patients by dosing specific IgM and IgG total antibodies and interleukin 6, correlating them with the hematological and biochemical blood parameters and comparing them by the form [...] Read more.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune and inflammatory responses in COVID-19 patients by dosing specific IgM and IgG total antibodies and interleukin 6, correlating them with the hematological and biochemical blood parameters and comparing them by the form of the disease. Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-five patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19, hospitalized between 15.03.2020 and 1.07.2020 in the Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases “Sf. Parascheva” Iaşi, were tested by chemiluminescence for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG and IL-6 in the serum. The results were correlated with the results of the CBC count and serum biochemical parameters detected on the admission day. The patients presented different forms of the disease (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the clinical management of COVID-19. Results: The amplitude of the immune response was directly correlated with the form of the disease. In the asymptomatic/mild form patients, the IL-6 and CRP concentrations were significantly higher and eosinophil count was significantly lower compared with the reference interval. In the moderate form, the concentrations of IL-6, CRP, and IgG were significantly higher, compared with the reference interval, while eosinophil count and eGFR were significantly lower. In severe/critical COVID-19 patients, IL-6, CRP, NLR, PLR, glucose, AST, urea, creatinine, and eGFR were significantly higher compared with the reference interval, while eosinophil count was significantly lower. IL-6 boosted in all forms of COVID-19, with a major increase in severe and critical patients. IL-6, neutrophil count, % neutrophils, NLR, PLR, CRP, AST, and urea increased with the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the lymphocyte count, % lymphocytes, eosinophil count, % eosinophils, and hemoglobin decreased with the increased severity of COVID-19. Conclusions: The amplitude and the moment of appearance of the immune response depended on the form of the disease. IgM generally occurred in the first 14 days of illness, and IgG appeared beginning with the second week of disease. IgG titer increased rapidly until the fourth week of disease and decreased slowly after 4 weeks. The amplitudes of all the tested inflammatory and serological markers depended on the COVID-19 form, increasing somewhat in the moderate forms and even more in the critical ones. The lymphocyte and eosinophil count are able to predict the risk of severe COVID-19. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5391 KiB  
Article
Human Adenovirus and Influenza A Virus Exacerbate SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Animal Models
by Victor A. Svyatchenko, Vladimir A. Ternovoi, Roman Y. Lutkovskiy, Elena V. Protopopova, Andrei S. Gudymo, Nataliya V. Danilchenko, Ivan M. Susloparov, Nataliya P. Kolosova, Alexander B. Ryzhikov, Oleg S. Taranov, Vladimir V. Omigov, Elena V. Gavrilova, Alexander P. Agafonov, Rinat A. Maksyutov and Valery B. Loktev
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010180 - 11 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3153
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the features of the infectious process by simulating co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) or influenza A virus (IAV) in vitro and in vivo. The determination of infectious activity of viruses and digital PCR demonstrated [...] Read more.
In this study, we investigated the features of the infectious process by simulating co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) or influenza A virus (IAV) in vitro and in vivo. The determination of infectious activity of viruses and digital PCR demonstrated that during simultaneous and sequential HAdV-5 followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and in vivo, the HAdV-5 infection does not interfere with replication of SARS-CoV-2. The hamsters co-infected and mono-infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited nearly identical viral titers and viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs. The hamsters and ferrets co-infected by SARS-CoV-2- and IAV demonstrated more pronounced clinical manifestations than mono-infected animals. Additionally, the lung histological data illustrate that HAdV-5 or IAV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection induces more severe pathological changes in the lungs than mono-infection. The expression of several genes specific to interferon and cytokine signaling pathways in the lungs of co-infected hamsters was more upregulated compared to single infected with SARS-CoV-2 animals. Thus, co-infection with HAdV-5 or IAV and SARS-CoV-2 leads to more severe pulmonary disease in animals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1468 KiB  
Article
Association between Brain Injury Markers and Testosterone in Critically-Ill COVID-19 Male Patients
by Daria Tokic, Marijana Mikacic, Marko Kumric, Tina Ticinovic Kurir, Iva Rancic, Dinko Martinovic, Josipa Bukic, Josip Vrdoljak, Ivan Kresimir Lizatovic, Sanda Stojanovic Stipic, Daniela Supe Domic and Josko Bozic
Microorganisms 2022, 10(11), 2095; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112095 - 22 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1550
Abstract
Accumulating data suggest that various neurologic manifestations are reported in critically-ill COVID-19 patients. Although low testosterone levels were associated with poor outcomes, the relationship between testosterone levels and indices of brain injury are still poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether testosterone [...] Read more.
Accumulating data suggest that various neurologic manifestations are reported in critically-ill COVID-19 patients. Although low testosterone levels were associated with poor outcomes, the relationship between testosterone levels and indices of brain injury are still poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether testosterone levels are associated with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), biomarkers of brain injury, in patients with a severe form of COVID-19. The present study was conducted on 65 male patients aged 18–65 with severe COVID-19. Blood samples were collected at three time points: upon admission to ICU, 7 days after, and 14 days after. In patients with neurological sequels (n = 20), UCH-L1 serum concentrations at admission were markedly higher than in patients without them (240.0 (155.4–366.4) vs. 146.4 (92.5–243.9) pg/mL, p = 0.022). GFAP concentrations on admission did not differ between the groups (32.2 (24.2–40.1) vs. 29.8 (21.8–39.4) pg/mL, p = 0.372). Unlike GFAP, UCH-L1 serum concentrations exhibited a negative correlation with serum testosterone in all three time points (r = −0.452, p < 0.001; r = −0.430, p < 0.001 and r = −0.476, p = 0.001, respectively). The present study suggests that the traumatic brain injury biomarker UCH-L1 may be associated with neurological impairments seen in severe COVID-19. Moreover, a negative correlation between UCH-L1 and serum testosterone concentrations implies that testosterone may have a role in the development of neurological sequels in critically-ill COVID-19 patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3643 KiB  
Article
Epidemiological and Serological Analysis of a SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in a Nursing Home: Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Enhanced Neutralizing Immunity Following Breakthrough Infection
by Barbara I. Streibl, Heidi Lahne, Andreas Grahl, Philipp Agsten, Magdalena Bichler, Christa Büchl, Marco Damzog, Ute Eberle, Stefan Gärtner, Bernhard Hobmaier, Gabriele Margos, Martin Hoch, Sabrina Jungnick, Walter Jonas, Katharina Katz, Liane Laubert, Barbara Schutt, Cornelia Seidl, Bianca Treis, Daniel Weindl, Karen Zilch, Manfred Wildner, Bernhard Liebl, Nikolaus Ackermann, Andreas Sing and Volker Fingerleadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1809; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091809 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1684
Abstract
Background: Despite a vaccination rate of 82.0% (n = 123/150), a SARS-CoV-2 (Alpha) outbreak with 64.7% (n = 97/150) confirmed infections occurred in a nursing home in Bavaria, Germany. Objective: the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to [...] Read more.
Background: Despite a vaccination rate of 82.0% (n = 123/150), a SARS-CoV-2 (Alpha) outbreak with 64.7% (n = 97/150) confirmed infections occurred in a nursing home in Bavaria, Germany. Objective: the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the effects of the Corminaty vaccine in a real-life outbreak situation and to obtain insights into the antibody response to both vaccination and breakthrough infection. Methods: the antibody status of 106 fully vaccinated individuals (54/106 breakthrough infections) and epidemiological data on all 150 residents and facility staff were evaluated. Results: SARS-CoV-2 infections (positive RT-qPCR) were detected in 56.9% (n = 70/123) of fully vaccinated, compared to 100% (n = 27/27) of incompletely or non-vaccinated individuals. The proportion of hospitalized and deceased was 4.1% (n = 5/123) among fully vaccinated and therewith lower compared to 18.5% (n = 5/27) hospitalized and 11.1% (n = 3/27) deceased among incompletely or non-vaccinated. Ct values were significantly lower in incompletely or non-vaccinated (p = 0.02). Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 99.1% (n = 105/106) of serum samples with significantly higher values (p < 0.001) being measured post-breakthrough infection. α-N-antibodies were detected in 37.7% of PCR positive but not in PCR negative individuals. Conclusion: Altogether, our data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does provide protection against infection, severe disease progression and death with regards to the Alpha variant. Nonetheless, it also shows that infection and transmission are possible despite full vaccination. It further indicates that breakthrough infections can significantly enhance α-S- and neutralizing antibody responses, indicating a possible benefit from booster vaccinations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 258 KiB  
Article
Role of Intracellular Pulmonary Pathogens during SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the First Pandemic Wave of COVID-19: Clinical and Prognostic Significance in a Case Series of 1200 Patients
by Matteo Guarino, Benedetta Perna, Francesca Cuoghi, Michele Domenico Spampinato, Alice Eleonora Cesaro, Francesca Manza, Adriana Pretula, Anastasio Grilli, Martina Maritati, Giacomo Caio, Aldo Carnevale, Maria Elena Flacco, Roberto De Giorgio and Carlo Contini
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081636 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2203
Abstract
Background: Since 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths worldwide and is the second most serious pandemic after the Spanish flu. Despite SARS-CoV-2 infection having a dominant effect on morbidity and life-threatening outcomes, [...] Read more.
Background: Since 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths worldwide and is the second most serious pandemic after the Spanish flu. Despite SARS-CoV-2 infection having a dominant effect on morbidity and life-threatening outcomes, the role of bacterial co-infection in patients with COVID-19 is poorly understood. The present study aimed to verify the existence of bacterial co-infections and their possible role as cofactors worsening COVID-19-related clinical manifestations. Methods: All patients with suspected SARS-CoV-infection, hospitalised in COVID-19 wards at the Sant’Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, were retrospectively included in this single-centre study and their specific bacterial serologies were assessed. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 1204 individual records were retrieved. Among them, 959 were excluded because of a negative nasopharyngeal swab or missing data; of the eligible 245 patients, 51 were co-infected. Compared to patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection alone, those with Chlamydia pneumoniae or Mycoplasma pneumoniae co-infections had worse respiratory/radiological features and more intensive care unit admissions. However, the co-infection did not result in a higher mortality rate. Conclusions: The present study, comparing clinical, laboratory and radiological findings between patients with COVID-19 vs. those with co-infections (C. pneumoniae or M. pneumoniae) showed that, on admission, these features were worse in co-infected patients, although the mortality rate did not differ between the two groups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
10 pages, 425 KiB  
Article
SARS-CoV-2 Mutations and Variants May Muddle the Sensitivity of COVID-19 Diagnostic Assays
by Mohammad Alkhatib, Luca Carioti, Stefano D’Anna, Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein, Valentina Svicher and Romina Salpini
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1559; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081559 - 2 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2155
Abstract
The performance of diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be impacted by SARS-CoV-2 variability as this is dependent on the full complementarity between PCR primers/probes and viral target templates. Here, we investigate the genetic variability of SARS-CoV-2 regions recognized by primers/probes utilized [...] Read more.
The performance of diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be impacted by SARS-CoV-2 variability as this is dependent on the full complementarity between PCR primers/probes and viral target templates. Here, we investigate the genetic variability of SARS-CoV-2 regions recognized by primers/probes utilized by PCR diagnostic assays based on nucleotide mismatching analysis. We evaluated the genetic variation in the binding regions of 73 primers/probes targeting the Nucleocapsid (N, N = 36), Spike (S, N = 22), and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase/Helicase (RdRp/Hel, N = 15) of the publicly available PCR-based assays. Over 4.9 million high-quality SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences were retrieved from GISAID and were divided into group-A (all except Omicron, >4.2 million) and group-B (only Omicron, >558 thousand). In group-A sequences, a large range of variability in primers/probes binding regions in most PCR assays was observed. Particularly, 87.7% (64/73) of primers/probes displayed ≥1 mismatch with their viral targets, while 8.2% (6/73) contained ≥2 mismatches and 2.7% (2/73) contained ≥3 mismatches. In group-B sequences, 32.9% (24/73) of primers/probes were characterized by ≥1 mismatch, 13.7% (10/73) by ≥2 mismatches, and 5.5% (4/73) by ≥3 mismatches. The high rate of single and multiple mismatches- found in the target regions of molecular assays used worldwide for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis reinforces the need to optimize and constantly update these assays according to SARS-CoV-2 genetic evolution and the future emergence of novel variants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
11 pages, 1741 KiB  
Article
Effects of Antibody Responses to Pre-Existing Coronaviruses on Disease Severity and Complement Activation in COVID-19 Patients
by Massimo Cugno, Pier Luigi Meroni, Dario Consonni, Samantha Griffini, Elena Grovetti, Cristina Novembrino, Adriana Torri, Gloria Griffante, Marisa Gariglio, Luca Varani and Flora Peyvandi
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1191; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061191 - 10 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1974
Abstract
The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be influenced by pre-existing immune responses against endemic coronaviruses, but conflicting data have been reported. We studied 148 patients who were hospitalised because of a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, classified mild in 58, moderate in [...] Read more.
The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be influenced by pre-existing immune responses against endemic coronaviruses, but conflicting data have been reported. We studied 148 patients who were hospitalised because of a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, classified mild in 58, moderate in 44, and severe in 46. The controls were 27 healthy subjects. At admission, blood samples were collected for the measurement of biomarkers of disease severity and levels of the IgG against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and pre-existing coronaviruses OC43, HKU1, NL63 and 229E. Higher levels of IgG antibodies against the RBD of pre-existing coronavirus (with the highest significance for anti-HKU1 IgG, p = 0.01) were found in patients with mild disease, compared with those with moderate or severe disease. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the association of high levels of antibodies to pre-existing coronavirus with mild disease and showed their associations with low levels of the complement activation marker SC5b-9 (p range = 0.007–0.05). High levels of anti-NL63 antibodies were associated with low levels of the coagulation activation marker D-dimer (p = 0.04), while high levels of IgG against 229E were associated with low levels of the endothelial activation marker von Willebrand factor (p = 0.05). Anti-SARS-CoV-2-neutralising activity of plasma positively correlated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (r = 0.53, p = 0.04) and with anti-HKU1 IgG (r = 0.51, p = 0.05). In hospitalised patients with COVID-19, high levels of antibodies to pre-existing coronaviruses are associated with mild disease, suggesting that their measurement could be useful in predicting the severity of the disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 585 KiB  
Article
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Alpha and Delta Variant Breakthrough Infections Are Rare and Mild but Can Happen Relatively Early after Vaccination
by Jelissa Katharina Peter, Fanny Wegner, Severin Gsponer, Fabrice Helfenstein, Tim Roloff, Rahel Tarnutzer, Kerstin Grosheintz, Moritz Back, Carla Schaubhut, Sabina Wagner, Helena M. B. Seth-Smith, Patrick Scotton, Maurice Redondo, Christiane Beckmann, Tanja Stadler, Andrea Salzmann, Henriette Kurth, Karoline Leuzinger, Stefano Bassetti, Roland Bingisser, Martin Siegemund, Maja Weisser, Manuel Battegay, Sarah Tschudin Sutter, Aitana Lebrand, Hans H. Hirsch, Simon Fuchs and Adrian Egliadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 857; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050857 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2733
Abstract
(1) Background: Some COVID-19 vaccine recipients show breakthrough infection. It remains unknown, which factors contribute to risks and severe outcomes. Our aim was to identify risk factors for SCoV2 breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated individuals. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Some COVID-19 vaccine recipients show breakthrough infection. It remains unknown, which factors contribute to risks and severe outcomes. Our aim was to identify risk factors for SCoV2 breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated individuals. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study from 28 December 2020 to 25 October 2021. Data of all patients with breakthrough infection was compared to data of all vaccine recipients in the Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland. Further, breakthrough infections by Alpha- and Delta-variants were compared. (3) Results: Only 0.39% (488/126,586) of all vaccine recipients suffered from a breakthrough infection during the observational period, whereof most cases were asymptomatic or mild (97.2%). Breakthrough infections after full vaccination occurred in the median after 78 days (IQR 47-123.5). Factors with lower odds for breakthrough infection were age (OR 0.987) and previous COVID-19 infection prior to vaccination (OR 0.296). Factors with higher odds for breakthrough infection included vaccination with Pfizer/BioNTech instead of Moderna (OR 1.459), chronic disease (OR 2.109), and healthcare workers (OR 1.404). (4) Conclusions: Breakthrough infections are rare and mild but can occur early after vaccination. This implies that booster vaccination might be initiated earlier, especially for risk groups. Due to new variants emerging repeatedly, continuous monitoring of breakthrough infections is crucial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 961 KiB  
Article
A New Early Predictor of Fatal Outcome for COVID-19 in an Italian Emergency Department: The Modified Quick-SOFA
by Matteo Guarino, Benedetta Perna, Francesca Remelli, Francesca Cuoghi, Alice Eleonora Cesaro, Michele Domenico Spampinato, Martina Maritati, Carlo Contini and Roberto De Giorgio
Microorganisms 2022, 10(4), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040806 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2146
Abstract
Background: Since 2019, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is causing a rapidly spreading pandemic. The present study aims to compare a modified quick SOFA (MqSOFA) score with the NEWS-2 score to predict in-hospital mortality (IHM), 30-days mortality and recovery [...] Read more.
Background: Since 2019, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is causing a rapidly spreading pandemic. The present study aims to compare a modified quick SOFA (MqSOFA) score with the NEWS-2 score to predict in-hospital mortality (IHM), 30-days mortality and recovery setting. Methods: All patients admitted from March to October 2020 to the Emergency Department of St. Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy with clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection were retrospectively included in this single-centre study and evaluated with the MqSOFA and NEWS-2 scores. Statistical and logistic regression analyses were applied to our database. Results: A total of 3359 individual records were retrieved. Among them, 2716 patients were excluded because of a negative nasopharyngeal swab and 206 for lacking data; thus, 437 patients were eligible. The data showed that the MqSOFA and NEWS-2 scores equally predicted IHM (p < 0.001) and 30-days mortality (p < 0.001). Higher incidences of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents, dementia, chronic kidney disease and cancer were found in the deceased vs. survived group. Conclusions: In this study we confirmed that the MqSOFA score was non-inferior to the NEWS-2 score in predicting IHM and 30-days mortality. Furthermore, the MqSOFA score was easier to use than NEWS-2 and is more suitable for emergency settings. Neither the NEWS-2 nor the MqSOFA scores were able to predict the recovery setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

15 pages, 1218 KiB  
Review
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Post-COVID-19 Lung Fibrosis: Links and Risks
by Filippo Patrucco, Paolo Solidoro, Francesco Gavelli, Daria Apostolo and Mattia Bellan
Microorganisms 2023, 11(4), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040895 - 30 Mar 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5648
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is considered the paradigmatic example of chronic progressive fibrosing disease; IPF does not result from a primary immunopathogenic mechanism, but immune cells play a complex role in orchestrating the fibrosing response. These cells are activated by pathogen-associated or danger-associated [...] Read more.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is considered the paradigmatic example of chronic progressive fibrosing disease; IPF does not result from a primary immunopathogenic mechanism, but immune cells play a complex role in orchestrating the fibrosing response. These cells are activated by pathogen-associated or danger-associated molecular patterns generating pro-fibrotic pathways or downregulating anti-fibrotic agents. Post-COVID pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF) is an emerging clinical entity, following SARS-CoV-2 infection; it shares many clinical, pathological, and immune features with IPF. Similarities between IPF and PCPF can be found in intra- and extracellular physiopathological pro-fibrotic processes, genetic signatures, as well as in the response to antifibrotic treatments. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection can be a cause of acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF), which can negatively impact on IPF patients’ prognosis. In this narrative review, we explore the pathophysiological aspects of IPF, with particular attention given to the intracellular signaling involved in the generation of fibrosis in IPF and during the SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the similarities between IPF and PCPF. Finally, we focus on COVID-19 and IPF in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1801 KiB  
Review
Epigenetic Targets and Pathways Linked to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Pathology
by Ali A. Rabaan, Mohammed Aljeldah, Basim R. Al Shammari, Roua A. Alsubki, Jawaher Alotaibi, Yousef N. Alhashem, Neda A. Alali, Tarek Sulaiman, Zainab Alsalem, Huda A. Bajunaid, Mohammed Garout, Heba A. Alsaffar, Souad A. Almuthree, Doha Hudhaiah, Azhar M. Alzaher, Fatimah A. Alshaikh, Amer Alshengeti, Mustafa A. Najim, Ramadan Abdelmoez Farahat and Ranjan K. Mohapatra
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020341 - 30 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2414
Abstract
The scale at which the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic has spread remains enormous. Provided the genetic makeup of the virus and humans is readily available, the quest for knowing the mechanism and epidemiology continues to prevail across the entire scientific community. Several aspects, including immunology, [...] Read more.
The scale at which the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic has spread remains enormous. Provided the genetic makeup of the virus and humans is readily available, the quest for knowing the mechanism and epidemiology continues to prevail across the entire scientific community. Several aspects, including immunology, molecular biology, and host-pathogen interaction, are continuously being dug into for preparing the human race for future pandemics. The exact reasons for vast differences in symptoms, pathophysiological implications of COVID-infections, and mortality differences remain elusive. Hence, researchers are also looking beyond traditional genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics approach, especially entrusting the environmental regulation of the genetic landscape of COVID–human interactions. In line with these questions lies a critical process called epigenetics. The epigenetic perturbations in both host and parasites are a matter of great interest to unravel the disparities in COVID-19 mortalities and pathology. This review provides a deeper insight into current research on the epigenetic landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and potential targets for augmenting the ongoing investigation. It also explores the potential targets, pathways, and networks associated with the epigenetic regulation of processes involved in SARS-CoV-2 pathology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 686 KiB  
Review
Advanced Molecular and Immunological Diagnostic Methods to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Infection
by John Charles Rotondo, Fernanda Martini, Martina Maritati, Elisabetta Caselli, Carla Enrica Gallenga, Matteo Guarino, Roberto De Giorgio, Chiara Mazziotta, Maria Letizia Tramarin, Giada Badiale, Mauro Tognon and Carlo Contini
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061193 - 10 Jun 2022
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 5253
Abstract
COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 in China and quickly spread across the globe, causing over 521 million cases of infection and 6.26 million deaths to date. After 2 years, numerous advances have been made. First of all, the preventive vaccine, which has been [...] Read more.
COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 in China and quickly spread across the globe, causing over 521 million cases of infection and 6.26 million deaths to date. After 2 years, numerous advances have been made. First of all, the preventive vaccine, which has been implemented in record time, is effective in more than 95% of cases. Additionally, in the diagnostic field, there are numerous molecular and antigenic diagnostic kits that are equipped with high sensitivity and specificity. Real Time-PCR-based assays for the detection of viral RNA are currently considered the gold-standard method for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and can be used efficiently on pooled nasopharyngeal, or oropharyngeal samples for widespread screening. Moreover, additional, and more advanced molecular methods such as droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR), clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are currently under development to detect the SARS-CoV-2 RNA. However, as the number of subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 continuously increases globally, health care systems are being placed under increased stress. Thus, the clinical laboratory plays an important role, helping to select especially asymptomatic individuals who are actively carrying the live replicating virus, with fast and non-invasive molecular technologies. Recent diagnostic strategies, other than molecular methods, have been adopted to either detect viral antigens, i.e., antigen-based immunoassays, or human anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, i.e., antibody-based immunoassays, in nasal or oropharyngeal swabs, as well as in blood or saliva samples. However, the role of mucosal sIgAs, which are essential in the control of viruses entering the body through mucosal surfaces, remains to be elucidated, and in particular the role of the immune response in counteracting SARS-CoV-2 infection, primarily at the site(s) of virus entry that appears to be promising. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

8 pages, 540 KiB  
Brief Report
Performance of Dried Blood Spot Samples in SARS-CoV-2 Serolomics
by Rima Jeske, Uta Merle, Barbara Müller, Tim Waterboer and Julia Butt
Microorganisms 2022, 10(7), 1311; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071311 - 29 Jun 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1509
Abstract
Numerous sero-epidemiological studies have been initiated to investigate the spread and dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To address the concomitant need for serological high-throughput assays, a bead-based multiplex serology assay, specific for SARS-CoV-2, had been developed. SARS-CoV-2 serolomics allows [...] Read more.
Numerous sero-epidemiological studies have been initiated to investigate the spread and dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To address the concomitant need for serological high-throughput assays, a bead-based multiplex serology assay, specific for SARS-CoV-2, had been developed. SARS-CoV-2 serolomics allows for measuring antibody responses to almost the entire SARS-CoV-2 proteome in up to 2000 serum samples per day. To enlarge the pool of eligible sample collection methods, we here test the compatibility of serolomics with dried blood spot (DBS)-derived eluates. Antibody levels of nine SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including the nucleocapsid (N) and receptor-binding domain of the spike protein (S1-RBD), were measured in 142 paired DBS and serum samples. The numeric correlation between the two sample types was high, with a Pearson’s r of 0.88 for both S1-RBD and N and intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Systematically reduced antibody levels in DBS eluates were compensated by lowering the cutoffs for seropositivity accordingly. This enabled the concordant classification of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity, without loss in sensitivity. Antibody levels against accessory SARS-CoV-2 antigens also showed a high concordance, demonstrating that DBS-derived eluates are eligible for SARS-CoV-2 serolomics. DBS cards facilitate the collection of blood samples, as they obviate the need for medically trained personnel and can be shipped at room temperature. In combination with SARS-CoV-2 serolomics, DBS cards enable powerful sero-epidemiological studies, thus allowing for the monitoring of patients and epidemiological analyses in resource-poor settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop