Medicina

Research

Jump to: Other

12 pages, 3058 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Using Quantitative Hormone Monitoring to Identify the Postpartum Return of Fertility

by Thomas P. Bouchard, Katherine Schweinsberg, Amanda Smith and Mary Schneider

Medicina 2023, 59(11), 2008; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59112008 - 15 Nov 2023

Viewed by 1198

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The Marquette Method (MM) has been used for many years to track the postpartum return of fertility using the ClearBlue Fertility Monitor (CBFM). A new quantitative urine hormone monitor (the Mira Analyzer) was compared to the CBFM in one [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: The Marquette Method (MM) has been used for many years to track the postpartum return of fertility using the ClearBlue Fertility Monitor (CBFM). A new quantitative urine hormone monitor (the Mira Analyzer) was compared to the CBFM in one previous study, and using this pilot data, several women have started to use the Mira Analyzer in the postpartum transition to fertility. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational case series that analyzed hormone data on the Mira Analyzer during the postpartum period. Participants were invited to share their postpartum cycle and hormone observations. Quantitative hormones in the urine included estrone-3-glucuronide (E3G), luteinizing hormone (LH), and pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG). Data were collected using an electronic survey and an online portal for hormone data. Data collected included participant demographics, menstrual cycle characteristics, and reproductive health history. Hormone range values were calculated, and thresholds were identified that would best predict the first ovulation that led to the first postpartum menstrual period, as well as in transition cycles. Hormone patterns were identified in the context of previous studies. Results: Twenty participants contributed data for the analysis. Triggering ovulation before the first period postpartum (Cycle 0) usually required higher LH thresholds than for regularly cycling women. Three different patterns were observed in the return of fertility postpartum: minimal ovarian activity, follicular activity without ovulation, and the early return of fertility. Abstinence rates for avoiding pregnancy with experimental thresholds were calculated. Conclusions: Higher LH thresholds in Cycle 0 suggest a decreased responsiveness of the ovaries to LH stimulation from the pituitary. This study replicates postpartum hormone patterns from a previous study. Larger studies are planned to evaluate the effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy using the Mira Analyzer in the postpartum return of fertility. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1107 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Survey Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Menstrual Cycle Tracking Technologies

by Theresa M. Stujenske, Qiyan Mu, Melisssa Pérez Capotosto and Thomas P. Bouchard

Medicina 2023, 59(9), 1509; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091509 - 22 Aug 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2075

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Digital health and personalized medicine are advancing at an unprecedented pace. Users can document their menstrual cycle data in a variety of ways, including smartphone applications (apps), temperature tracking devices, and at-home urine hormone tests. Understanding the needs and [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: Digital health and personalized medicine are advancing at an unprecedented pace. Users can document their menstrual cycle data in a variety of ways, including smartphone applications (apps), temperature tracking devices, and at-home urine hormone tests. Understanding the needs and goals of women using menstrual cycle tracking technologies is the first step to making these technologies more evidence based. The purpose of this study was to examine the current use of these technologies and explore how they are being used within the context of common hormonal and reproductive disorders, like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, and infertility. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study evaluating menstrual cycle tracking technology use. Participants were recruited in January–March 2023 using social media groups and a Marquette Method instructor email listserv. Data were collected using an electronic survey with Qualtrics. Data collected included participant demographics, menstrual cycle characteristics, reproductive health history, and menstrual cycle tracking behavior. Results: Three-hundred and sixty-eight participants were included in the analysis. Women had various motivations for tracking their menstrual cycles. Most participants (72.8%) selected “to avoid getting pregnant” as the primary motivation. Three hundred and fifty-six participants (96.7%) reported using a fertility awareness-based method to track and interpret their menstrual cycle data. The Marquette Method, which utilizes urine hormone tracking, was the most frequently used method (n = 274, 68.2%). The most frequently used cycle technology was a urine hormone test or monitor (n = 299, 81.3%), followed by a smartphone app (n = 253, 68.8%), and a temperature tracking device (n = 116, 31.5%). Women with PCOS (63.6%), endometriosis (61.8%), and infertility (75%) in our study reported that the use of tracking technologies aided in the diagnosis. Most participants (87.2%) reported a high degree of satisfaction with their use and that they contributed to their reproductive health knowledge (73.9%). Conclusions: Women in our study reported avoiding pregnancy as their primary motivation for using menstrual cycle tracking technologies, with the most frequently used being a urine hormone test or monitor. Our study results emphasize the need to validate these technologies to support their use for family planning. Given that most women in this study reported using a fertility awareness-based method, the results cannot be generalized to all users of menstrual cycle tracking technologies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1364 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Using Hormone Data and Age to Pinpoint Cycle Day within the Menstrual Cycle

by Elinor Hills, Mark B. Woodland and Aparna Divaraniya

Medicina 2023, 59(7), 1348; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071348 - 23 Jul 2023

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2918

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Menstrual cycle tracking is essential for reproductive health and overall well-being. However, there is still an over-reliance on estimations that standard cycles are 28 days long, divided evenly between the follicular and luteal phases. Due to the variability of [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: Menstrual cycle tracking is essential for reproductive health and overall well-being. However, there is still an over-reliance on estimations that standard cycles are 28 days long, divided evenly between the follicular and luteal phases. Due to the variability of cycle length and cycle phase lengths, common methods of identifying where an individual is in their cycle are often inaccurate. This study used daily hormone monitoring obtained through a remote hormone-monitoring platform to evaluate hormone levels across a menstrual cycle to identify nuances in the follicular and luteal phases in individuals of different age groups. Materials and Methods: This study used a remote fertility testing system that quantitatively tracks luteinizing hormone (LH) and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (PdG) through urine tests read by an AI-powered smartphone app. The study analyzed cycle data from 1233 users with a total of 4123 evaluated cycles. Daily levels for LH and PdG were monitored across multiple cycles. Results: This study determined that calculated cycle lengths tended to be shorter than user-reported cycle lengths. Significant differences were observed in cycle phase lengths between age groups, indicating that follicular phase length declines with age while luteal phase length increases. Finally, the study found that if an individual’s age, first cycle day, and current hormone levels are known, population-level hormone data can be used to pinpoint which cycle phase and cycle day they are in with 95% confidence. Conclusions: At-home hormone monitoring technologies can allow patients and clinicians to track their cycles with greater precision than when relying on textbook estimations. The study’s findings have implications for fertility planning, clinical management, and general health monitoring. Prior to this study, no standard existed for pinpointing where a person was in their cycle through only one measure of LH and PdG. These findings have the potential to fill significant gaps within reproductive healthcare and beyond. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Graphical abstract

8 pages, 264 KiB

Open AccessArticle

A Comparison of Two Hormonal Fertility Monitoring Systems for Ovulation Detection: A Pilot Study

by Qiyan Mu and Richard Jerome Fehring

Medicina 2023, 59(2), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020400 - 18 Feb 2023

Viewed by 2455

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Accuracy in detecting ovulation and estimating the fertile window in the menstrual cycle is essential for women to avoid or achieve pregnancy. There has been a rapid growth in fertility apps and home ovulation testing kits in recent years. [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: Accuracy in detecting ovulation and estimating the fertile window in the menstrual cycle is essential for women to avoid or achieve pregnancy. There has been a rapid growth in fertility apps and home ovulation testing kits in recent years. Nevertheless, there lacks information on how well these apps perform in helping users understand their fertility in the menstrual cycle. This pilot study aimed to evaluate and compare the beginning, peak, and length of the fertile window as determined by a new luteinizing hormone (LH) fertility tracking app with the Clearblue Fertility Monitor (CBFM). Materials and Methods: A total of 30 women were randomized into either a quantitative Premom or a qualitative Easy@Home (EAH) LH testing system. The results of the two testing systems were compared with the results from the CBFM over three menstrual cycles of use. Potential LH levels for estimating the beginning of the fertile window were calculated along with user acceptability and satisfaction. Results: The estimates of peak fertility by the Premom and EAH LH testing were highly correlated with the CBFM peak results (R = 0.99, p < 0.001). The participants had higher satisfaction and ease-of-use ratings with the CBFM compared to the Premom and EAH LH testing systems. LH 95% confidence levels for estimating the beginning of the fertile window were provided for both the Premom and EAH LH testing results. Conclusions: Our pilot study findings suggest that the Premom and EAH LH fertility testing app can accurately detect impending ovulation for women and are easy to use at home. However, successful utilization of these low-cost LH testing tools and apps for fertility self-monitoring and family planning needs further evaluation with a large and more diverse population. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

12 pages, 1781 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Complete Cycle Mapping Using a Quantitative At-Home Hormone Monitoring System in Prediction of Fertile Days, Confirmation of Ovulation, and Screening for Ovulation Issues Preventing Conception

by Andrea K. Wegrzynowicz, Amy Beckley, Aimee Eyvazzadeh, Gary Levy, John Park and Joshua Klein

Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1853; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121853 - 15 Dec 2022

Viewed by 5351

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To achieve pregnancy, it is highly beneficial to identify the time of ovulation as well as the greater period of fertile days during which sperm may survive leading up to ovulation. Confirming successful ovulation is also critical to accurately diagnose [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: To achieve pregnancy, it is highly beneficial to identify the time of ovulation as well as the greater period of fertile days during which sperm may survive leading up to ovulation. Confirming successful ovulation is also critical to accurately diagnose ovulatory disorders. Ovulation predictor kits, fertility monitors, and tracking apps are all available to assist with detecting ovulation, but often fall short. They may not detect the full fertile window, provide accurate or real-time information, or are simply expensive and impractical. Finally, few over-the-counter products provide information to women about their ovarian reserve and future fertility. Therefore, there is a need for an easy, over-the-counter, at-home quantitative hormone monitoring system that assesses ovarian reserve, predicts the entire fertile window, and can screen for ovulatory disorders. Materials and Methods: Proov Complete is a four-in-one at-home multihormone testing system that utilizes lateral flow assay test strips paired with the free Proov Insight App to guide testing of four hormones—FSH, E1G, LH, and PdG—across the woman’s cycle. In a pilot study, 40 women (including 16 with a fertility-related diagnosis or using fertility treatments) used Complete for one cycle. Results: Here, we demonstrate that Proov Complete can accurately and sensitively predict ovarian reserve, detect up to 6 fertile days and confirm if ovulation was successful, in one easy-to-use kit. Ovulation was confirmed in 38 cycles with a detectable PdG rise. An average of 5.3 fertile days (from E1G rise to PdG rise) were detected, with an average of 2.7 days prior to LH surge. Ovulation was confirmed via PdG rise an average of 2.6 days following the LH surge. While 38/40 women had a PdG rise, only 22 had a sustained PdG level above 5 μg/mL throughout the critical implantation window, indicating ovulatory dysfunction in 16 women. Conclusions: Proov Complete can detect the entire fertile window of up to 6 fertile days and confirm ovulation, while also providing information on ovarian reserve and guidance to clinicians and patients. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 4378 KiB

Open AccessCase Report

Case Reports from Women Using a Quantitative Hormone Monitor to Track the Perimenopause Transition

by Maria Meyers, Richard Jerome Fehring and Mary Schneider

Medicina 2023, 59(10), 1743; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101743 - 28 Sep 2023

Viewed by 3412

Abstract

The fertility tracking of menstrual cycles during perimenopause with a quantitative hormone monitor is a novel undertaking. Women in regular menstrual cycles have been tracking their fertility using different biomarkers since the 1960′s. Presently, there are newer electronic hormonal devices used to track [...] Read more.

The fertility tracking of menstrual cycles during perimenopause with a quantitative hormone monitor is a novel undertaking. Women in regular menstrual cycles have been tracking their fertility using different biomarkers since the 1960′s. Presently, there are newer electronic hormonal devices used to track fertility that provide more exact and objective data to help delineate the fertile time frame of a woman’s cycle. These devices measure quantitative levels of estrogen, the luteinizing hormone, progesterone, and follicle-stimulating hormone, all of which occur at varying levels during the menstrual cycle. As women advance toward menopause, their cycles vary in length, and their hormones fluctuate. In this retrospective analysis, forty-two women aged 40 to 50 tracked their cycles over time, and eight of these forty-two women used the quantitative hormonal device. With the use of this device, the perimenopausal period has revealed distinct hormonal cycle characteristics that are unique to this group of women. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss these cycle’s characteristics during perimenopause, which were found with the use of the quantitative hormonal device. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1600 KiB

Open AccessProtocol

Establishing a Gold Standard for Quantitative Menstrual Cycle Monitoring

by Thomas Bouchard, Paul Yong and Patricia Doyle-Baker

Medicina 2023, 59(9), 1513; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091513 - 23 Aug 2023

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2204

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The Quantum Menstrual Health Monitoring Study will measure four key reproductive hormones in the urine (follicle-stimulating hormone, FSH; estrone-3-glucuronide, E₁3G; luteinizing hormone, LH; and pregnanediol glucuronide, PDG) to characterize patterns that predict and confirm ovulation, referenced to [...] Read more.

Background and Objectives: The Quantum Menstrual Health Monitoring Study will measure four key reproductive hormones in the urine (follicle-stimulating hormone, FSH; estrone-3-glucuronide, E₁3G; luteinizing hormone, LH; and pregnanediol glucuronide, PDG) to characterize patterns that predict and confirm ovulation, referenced to serum hormones and the gold standard of the ultrasound day of ovulation in participants with regular cycles. These normal cycles will provide a reference for comparison to irregular cycles in subjects with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and athletes. Materials and Methods: Participants will track their menstrual cycles for 3 months and be provided with an at-home urine hormone monitor (Mira monitor) to predict ovulation. The day of ovulation will be confirmed with serial ultrasounds completed in a community clinic. Urine results will be compared to serum hormone values. Other markers of menstrual health, such as bleeding patterns and temperature changes, will be determined using a customized app. Three groups will be recruited. Group 1 will include those with consistent regular cycle lengths (between 24–38 days), and will be compared to two groups with irregular cycle lengths (with increased cycle length variability and longer cycles). Group 2 will include those with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) with irregular cycles and Group 3 will include individuals participating in high levels of exercise with irregular cycles. Hypothesis: The Mira monitor quantitative urine hormone pattern will accurately correlate with serum hormonal levels and will predict (with LH) and confirm (with PDG) the ultrasound day of ovulation in those with regular cycles as well as those with irregular cycles. Rationale: Once the ultrasound validation is complete, tools like the Mira monitor with a customized app may become a new standard for at-home and remote clinical monitoring of the menstrual cycle without having to use labor-intensive follicular-tracking ultrasound or follow serum hormone changes. Conclusions: Precision monitoring of the menstrual cycle is expected to impact individuals who want to increase their menstrual health literacy and guide decisions about fertility. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 1654 KiB

Open AccessCase Report

Using Quantitative Hormonal Fertility Monitors to Evaluate the Luteal Phase: Proof of Concept Case Study

by Thomas P. Bouchard

Medicina 2023, 59(1), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010140 - 10 Jan 2023

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2981

Abstract

Several new quantitative fertility monitors are now available for at-home use that measure estrogen, luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (PDG) in urine. This case report compares the Mira and Inito quantitative fertility monitors with the well-established qualitative ClearBlue fertility monitor. Three clinical scenarios [...] Read more.

Several new quantitative fertility monitors are now available for at-home use that measure estrogen, luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (PDG) in urine. This case report compares the Mira and Inito quantitative fertility monitors with the well-established qualitative ClearBlue fertility monitor. Three clinical scenarios were evaluated: a normal cycle, a prolonged luteinization cycle, and an anovulatory cycle. The identification of the luteal phase (or lack thereof in the case of anovulation) and the transition through the three processes of luteinization, progestation, and luteolysis were clearly demarcated with the help of quantitative LH and PDG. Quantitative fertility monitors have the potential to identify details of the luteal phase to help women with regular cycles and abnormal luteal phases to help target interventions for optimizing fertility. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Hormone Monitoring of the Menstrual Cycle)

► Show Figures