Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Molecular Markers, Immune Therapy and Targeted Therapy

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 August 2026 | Viewed by 1802

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
Interests: lung cancer; thoracic surgery; thoracic oncology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO-European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
Interests: lung cancer; AI; immuno-oncology; thoracic surgery; cythopathology; global health

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Lung cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer and a major cause of cancer deaths globally, with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) being the most prevalent subtype. In recent decades, advances in molecular profiling and immuno-oncology have transformed the therapeutic landscape with novel predictive biomarkers, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and target-based therapies, leading to improved survival for select patient cohorts. However, the response to therapy and disease progression, as well as long-term outcome, is highly heterogeneous. Thus, studies addressing the biological, clinical, and translational features of NSCLC remain an urgent need.

NSCLC: Molecular Markers, Immune Therapy, and Targeted Therapy is a Special Issue that aims to provide a compilation of current data regarding novel targets and clinical approaches and highlight the role of precision medicine in early-stage, advanced, and metastatic disease settings. We welcome purification papers pertaining to molecular alterations such as EGFR, KRAS, ALK, MET, and ROS1, rare oncogenic driver mutations, and immune-based therapy, including checkpoint inhibition, neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy, and markers of immune solution/resistance response.

We welcome research that is particularly aligned with the journal, including, but not limited to, the following topics: artificial intelligence and predictive modelling, liquid biopsy and ctDNA assessment, radiogenomics, primary and acquired resistance mechanisms, and innovative real-world combination regimens. We particularly welcome translational work that has a basis in clinical translation.

This Special Issue welcomes original research articles, systematic and meta-analyses, clinical trials, translational studies, and high-quality narrative reviews. We strongly advocate for collaborations between surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and computational scientists.

Dr. Juliana Guarize
Guest Editor

Dr. Claudia Bardoni
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • NSCLC
  • molecular markers
  • targeted therapy
  • immunotherapy
  • precision oncology
  • predictive biomarkers
  • EGFR
  • KRAS
  • ALK
  • liquid biopsy
  • ctDNA
  • resistance mechanisms
  • radiomics
  • real-world data
  • neoadjuvant therapy
  • adjuvant therapy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 3688 KB  
Article
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Impact of KRAS Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Tayyip İlker Aydın, Gökhan Öztürk, Aysun Fatma Akkuş, Ebru Taştekin, Sernaz Topaloğlu, Bülent Erdoğan, Ahmet Küçükarda and Muhammet Bekir Hacıoğlu
Medicina 2026, 62(6), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62061011 (registering DOI) - 23 May 2026
Viewed by 118
Abstract
Background/Objectives: KRAS mutations are among the most common oncogenic driver alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and define a biologically heterogeneous disease. In the current era of molecular oncology, with targeted therapies increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, the prognostic relevance of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: KRAS mutations are among the most common oncogenic driver alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and define a biologically heterogeneous disease. In the current era of molecular oncology, with targeted therapies increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, the prognostic relevance of individual KRAS mutation subtypes and their relationship with immune biomarkers such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) require further clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of KRAS mutation subtypes and their association with PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 150 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC who underwent next-generation sequencing at Trakya University Faculty of Medicine between January 2015 and December 2023 were included. Clinicopathological features, KRAS mutation subtypes, PD-L1 expression, and survival outcomes were assessed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results: KRAS G12C was the most frequent subtype (40.7%), followed by G12V (20.7%) and G12D (14.7%). OS differed significantly among KRAS mutation subtypes (log-rank p = 0.007), with median OS values of 18 months for G12D, 11 months for G12C, 11 months for other rare variants, 9 months for G12A and G12V, and 5 months for G13. PD-L1 positivity was significantly higher in KRAS G12C tumors compared with non-G12C subtypes and remained independently associated with improved OS in multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR = 0.622; 95% CI, 0.426–0.907; p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, age, ECOG performance status, disease stage, and PD-L1 positivity were independent prognostic factors, whereas KRAS mutation subtype did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusions: These findings suggest that KRAS-mutant NSCLC represents a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous subgroup and that integrating KRAS mutation subtypes with immune biomarkers may support more refined prognostic stratification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 860 KB  
Article
Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Across Molecular Subtypes and Their Clinical and Prognostic Implications in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Ali Aytac, Bilgin Demir, Meltem Demirtas Gulmez, Hayati Arvas, Tuba Ugur Tuzcu, Enes Erul, Salih Tunbekici, Tahir Yerlikaya, Sezai Tunc, Halil Ibrahim Ellez, Yasemin Aydinalp Camadan, Kubra Canaslan, Rumeysa Colak, Zuhat Urakci, Elif Berna Koksoy, Ozan Yazici, Ali Alkan, Ozgur Tanriverdi, Erdem Goker and Ahmet Demirkazik
Medicina 2026, 62(4), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040718 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a widely used biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its association with oncogenic driver alterations and prognostic significance across molecular subtypes in metastatic disease remains insufficiently defined. Materials and Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a widely used biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its association with oncogenic driver alterations and prognostic significance across molecular subtypes in metastatic disease remains insufficiently defined. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 332 patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and others) from eight oncology centers in Türkiye. Baseline serum CEA levels measured at metastatic diagnosis were analyzed on the natural logarithmic scale. Associations between CEA levels, molecular subtypes, clinical features, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using generalized linear models and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Baseline CEA levels differed significantly across molecular subtypes (p = 0.001), with EGFR-mutant tumors showing the highest median levels. Multivariable analysis identified driver alteration, histology, and metastatic burden as independent determinants of baseline CEA. Higher baseline CEA and metastatic site count were independently associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.151 and 1.279 per unit increase, respectively; p < 0.001), while female sex was protective (HR 0.626; p = 0.004). KRAS mutations were associated with poorer survival compared with EGFR (HR 2.370; p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a consistent trend toward longer OS in patients with CEA < 5 ng/mL, with significance only in the rare alteration subgroup. Conclusions: Baseline CEA may reflect underlying tumor biology across molecular subtypes and are associated with survival outcomes in metastatic NSCLC. However, given the variability across subgroups and modest effect sizes, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Prospective studies evaluating longitudinal CEA dynamics are warranted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1072 KB  
Article
The Effect of HER3 Expression on Prognosis in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study
by Canan Yıldız, Meltem Baykara, Hacer Demir, Ramazan Cosar, Sedat Yıldız, Beyza Unlu, Yaşar Culha, Duygu Ozaskin, Merve Kuday Özkan, Fariz Emrah Özkan and Çiğdem Özdemir
Medicina 2026, 62(3), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030538 - 13 Mar 2026
Viewed by 757
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC; however, primary and acquired resistance [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC; however, primary and acquired resistance continues to limit their long-term efficacy. HER3 (receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB3), a member of the ErbB receptor family, has been implicated in TKI resistance through heterodimerization with EGFR and HER2, leading to downstream PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Despite its biological plausibility as a resistance mediator, the clinical significance of HER3 expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC has not been thoroughly characterized in real-world cohorts. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 52 patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received TKI therapy at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University between January 2011 and September 2023. HER3 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections using the Huabio anti-HER3 antibody (clone PD00-44, 1:2000 dilution). Staining in more than 30% of tumor cells was considered HER3-positive; membranous staining intensity was scored on a 1–3 scale. Progression-free survival (PFS1, PFS2) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Of 52 patients (55.8% female; mean age 64.5 years), 59.6% received chemotherapy and 40.4% received an EGFR TKI as first-line treatment; erlotinib constituted 71.2% of targeted therapies. In the first-line TKI group, HER3-negative patients had a numerically longer median PFS1 compared with HER3-positive patients (14.0 vs. 7.1 months; p = 0.285); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance and should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size. In contrast, among patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, HER3 staining status did not meaningfully affect PFS1 (4.1 vs. 2.5 months; p = 0.063). In second-line treatment, HER3-positive patients who received TKI after prior chemotherapy demonstrated a PFS2 comparable to or slightly exceeding that of HER3-negative patients (21.8 vs. 19.8 months; p = 0.49), suggesting that the sequencing of chemotherapy before TKI may attenuate the adverse effect of HER3 positivity. Median OS was 15.1 months in HER3-negative patients and 12.7 months in HER3-positive patients (p = 0.824); this numerical difference of approximately 3 months did not reach statistical significance and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Among patients receiving TKI in the first line, HER3-positive patients had a shorter median OS than HER3-negative patients (9.6 vs. 14.2 months), whereas those receiving TKI in the second line showed a trend toward longer OS in HER3-positive patients (20.5 vs. 17.2 months). Conclusions: HER3 expression was associated with reduced first-line TKI efficacy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, suggesting a possible role for HER3 in primary TKI resistance; however, these findings are exploratory and did not reach statistical significance. The observation that HER3-positive patients who received chemotherapy before TKI demonstrated outcomes comparable to HER3-negative patients raises the hypothesis that treatment sequencing may potentially influence the impact of HER3 positivity, though this requires prospective validation before any clinical conclusions can be drawn. These results suggest that HER3 expression may warrant further investigation as a candidate biomarker for treatment sequencing decisions and as a potential therapeutic target in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Prospective studies evaluating chemotherapy–TKI sequencing and HER3-directed agents such as patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in HER3-positive patients are needed to confirm these preliminary observations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop