materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 June 2022) | Viewed by 13697

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Associate Professor in Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Interests: oral diseases; dental caries; dental education; restorative dentistry; dental materials; esthetic dentistry; endodontics; composite resins; root canal treatment; dental biomaterials
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The maintenance of primary or permanent teeth with immature roots plays a pivotal role in function and aesthetics, in terms of orthodontic-related issues and the oral health of young patients.

Tooth decay, the most prevalent chronic disease worldwide in children and one that involves millions of adult patients, results in high treatment costs and reduction of general patient health. Moreover, dental caries on primary teeth are considered one of the main risk factors of decay in permanent dentition.

Early carie management should reduce the progressive destruction of dental hard tissue and, subsequently, the loss of dental vitality, which reduces the incidence of critical conditions in which premature tooth extraction is required. To date, different preventive and operative strategies have been proposed. However, there is still not a consensus on the most effective therapy or the most suitable materials.

The aim of the present Special Issue is to provide a scientifically-based overview of the indications and objectives of primary and permanent teeth management, and to allow clinicians to follow specific therapeutic recommendations, diagnostic criteria, and treatment protocols in order to achieve clinical success over time.

Dr. Maurizio Bossu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • regenerative endodontics
  • vital pulp therapy
  • calcium silicate-based cements
  • bioactive materials
  • composite materials
  • adhesion
  • preventive dentistry
  • orthodontics
  • oral surgery

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 912 KiB  
Article
Apical Sealing Ability of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers Using a Radioactive Isotope Method: An In Vitro Apexification Model
by Inês Raquel Pereira, Catarina Carvalho, Siri Paulo, José Pedro Martinho, Ana Sofia Coelho, Anabela Baptista Paula, Carlos Miguel Marto, Eunice Carrilho, Maria Filomena Botelho, Ana Margarida Abrantes and Manuel Marques Ferreira
Materials 2021, 14(21), 6456; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216456 - 27 Oct 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2715
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of two calcium silicate-based sealers (TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty and White ProRoot MTA) when used as apical plugs in immature teeth through nuclear medicine. Single-rooted extracted teeth (n [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of two calcium silicate-based sealers (TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty and White ProRoot MTA) when used as apical plugs in immature teeth through nuclear medicine. Single-rooted extracted teeth (n = 34) had their crowns and root tip sectioned to obtain 14 mm long root segments to simulate an in vitro apexification model. Were created two experimental groups, namely MTA (n = 12) and BC (n = 12), and two control groups, PG (positive group, n = 5) and NG (negative group, n = 5). On the 4th day after placing the respective apical plug, the apical portions of the teeth were submerged in a solution of sodium pertechnetate (99mTcNaO4) for 3 h. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the MTA group and the controls (p < 0.05). The BC group had a significant difference regarding the negative control (p < 0.001) but showed no statistical significance regarding the positive control (p = 0.168). There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.009) between the BC group (7335.8 ± 2755.5) and the MTA group (4059.1 ± 1231.1), where the last showed less infiltration. Within the limitations of this study, White ProRoot MTA had a significantly better sealing ability than TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2442 KiB  
Article
Ion Capture and Release Ability of Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Nanoporous Silica Particles with Different Pore and Particle Size
by Ryoshun Endo, Ko Nakanishi, Yosuke Bando, Shigeaki Abe, Haruhi Maruoka, Mariko Nakamura, Tsukasa Akasaka, Yasuhiro Yoshida and Yoshiaki Sato
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5742; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195742 - 1 Oct 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1778
Abstract
This study prepared glass ionomer cement (GIC) containing nanoporous silica (NPS) (GIC–NPS) at 5 wt% concentrations using 3 types of NPS with different pore and particle sizes and evaluated the differences in their cationic ion capture/release abilities and mechanical properties. The cationic water-soluble [...] Read more.
This study prepared glass ionomer cement (GIC) containing nanoporous silica (NPS) (GIC–NPS) at 5 wt% concentrations using 3 types of NPS with different pore and particle sizes and evaluated the differences in their cationic ion capture/release abilities and mechanical properties. The cationic water-soluble dye was used as cationic ion. The test GIC–NPS complexes captured dyes by immersion in 1 wt% dye solutions. All the GIC–NPS complexes released dyes for 28 d, and the amount of dye released from the complexes increased with decreasing pore size; however, the particle size of NPS did not affect the amount of dye released. Additionally, GIC–NPS was able to recharge the dye, and the amount of released the dye by the complexes after recharge was almost identical to the amount released on the first charge. Although not significantly different, the compressive strength of GIC–NPS was slightly greater than that of GIC without NPS regardless of the type of NPS. These results suggest that the degree of capture and release of cationic molecules, such as drugs, can be controlled by optimizing the pore size of NPS without sacrificing its mechanical strength when its content is 5 wt%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2959 KiB  
Article
An Innovative Strategy for Oral Biofilm Control in Early Childhood Based on a Resveratrol-Cyclodextrin Nanotechnology Approach
by Giovanni Nicolao Berta, Federica Romano, Roberta Vallone, Giuliana Abbadessa, Federica Di Scipio and Patrizia Defabianis
Materials 2021, 14(14), 3801; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143801 - 7 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2174
Abstract
The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a novel oral spray containing resveratrol (RV) in controlling bacterial biofilm and gingival inflammation in early childhood. RV, a natural polyphenol, known for its anti-inflammatory and anti-infective activities, was [...] Read more.
The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a novel oral spray containing resveratrol (RV) in controlling bacterial biofilm and gingival inflammation in early childhood. RV, a natural polyphenol, known for its anti-inflammatory and anti-infective activities, was included in a nanovector of 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrins (HPβCD) to improve its bioavailability. A total of 64 children between two and five years of age with plaque-induced gingivitis were randomly included in two equal groups. Both groups were enrolled in a mechanical plaque control program for a period of four weeks, while the test group was also instructed to use the RV-HPβCD mouthwash (in spray formulation) once daily, after toothbrushing. All children underwent three oral hygiene motivation sessions, 14 days apart, during which the full-mouth presence of bacterial plaque, gingival inflammation, dental stain and salivary pH were recorded. At two-week appointment, they also received professional plaque removal. The use of RV-based oral spray significantly reduced the amount of dental plaque and the percentage of bleeding sites and improved salivary pH compared to the control group at both two- and four-week examinations. Based on these promising results, the local delivery of RV-HPβCD via oral spray could enhance the control of dental biofilm in early childhood, when antiseptic mouthwashes are not recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2853 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Biodentine in Pulpotomies of Primary Teeth with Different Stages of Root Resorption Using a Novel Composite Outcome Score
by Rosa Guagnano, Federica Romano and Patrizia Defabianis
Materials 2021, 14(9), 2179; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092179 - 24 Apr 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3594
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the success of pulpotomy in primary molars using Biodentine, new-developed tri-calcium, di-calcium-based silicate cement, at 6 and 12 months. The hypothesis was that stages of root resorption could influence the treatment success. A novel composite score was used [...] Read more.
This study aimed to assess the success of pulpotomy in primary molars using Biodentine, new-developed tri-calcium, di-calcium-based silicate cement, at 6 and 12 months. The hypothesis was that stages of root resorption could influence the treatment success. A novel composite score was used based on five clinical and radiographic outcomes: soft-tissue pathology, pain to percussion, pathologic mobility, radiolucency and pathologic root resorption. Patients’ compliance and intraoperative pain experience were recorded using the Frankl scale and the Wong–Baker scale. A total of 22 primary molars, 9 in stage S (stability) and 13 in stage R (resorption) were submitted to pulpotomy using Biodentine and restored with composite resin. The success rate was 92.3% in the R group compared to 100% in the S group at both 6 and 12 months (p = 0.850). There was no statistically significant effect of type of molar, tooth position and type of carious lesions on the composite outcome (all p > 0.05). Overall, 73% of the children experienced no or mild/moderate pain and 77% had a cooperative attitude. Children younger than 7 years old experienced more pain (p = 0.04). Biodentine is a promising biomaterial for pulpotomy of primary teeth regardless of the stage of root resorption. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 1756 KiB  
Review
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
by Flavia Iaculli, Alessandro Salucci, Gianni Di Giorgio, Valeria Luzzi, Gaetano Ierardo, Antonella Polimeni and Maurizio Bossù
Materials 2021, 14(21), 6694; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216694 - 6 Nov 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2133
Abstract
Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was [...] Read more.
Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. Methods: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Dental Materials in Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop