materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Materials for Biomedical Application and Regenerative Medicine

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 October 2023) | Viewed by 2045

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2. Center of Excellence for Regenerative Dentistry, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Interests: dental biomaterials; oral tissue engineering; bone cements; bone implants; oral antimicrobial peptides; biosensors; oral fluids proteomics; implant dentistry; dental education; bioactive glasses; sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Office of Oral Health Innovation, Department of Reconstructive and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
Interests: digital dentistry; guided implant surgery; structural biology; protein structure; salivary biomarkers; salivary proteomics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The sustainable biomaterial is a link between biomaterials and renewable natural resources that are giving us a fair chance to establish cutting-edge sustainable development strategies in the coming years. In medical applications, biomaterials are utilized to maintain, enhance, or replace damaged tissue or a biological function. They may be synthetic or natural. Today, biomaterials are crucial to medicine because they help patients recuperate from disease or injury by restoring function. Through the green technology concept, many biomaterials can be produced to reduce carbon emissions and help to maintain a green environment and a reduction in raw waste. The best outcome of sustainable biomaterials is that they can be recycled, reused and biodegraded in nature. In this Special Issue, we are inviting researcher/academics to submit original full papers, communications, and comprehensive reviews describing the latest progress in green synthesis and eco-friendly and environmentally sustainable biomaterials for application in biomedical and regenerative medicine.

Dr. Zohaib Khurshid
Dr. Sompop Bencharit
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • environmental sustainability
  • eco-friendly
  • green synthesis
  • carbon foot printing
  • biomass
  • biomaterials
  • biocompatibility
  • biodegradation
  • waste management
  • renewable sources
  • recycled materials
  • sustainable development goals

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1228 KiB  
Article
Shear Bond Strength and Fluoride Release of a Universal Adhesive: An In-Vitro Study on Primary Teeth
by Alaa Alsaadawi, Osama Felemban, Hani M. Nassar and Medhat Abdelbaki
Materials 2023, 16(7), 2573; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072573 - 23 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1602
Abstract
This investigation aimed to assess the shear bond strength and fluoride-releasing capabilities of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Forty-four extracted primary molars were divided into two groups, and the enamel substrate was prepared for evaluating shear bond strength. [...] Read more.
This investigation aimed to assess the shear bond strength and fluoride-releasing capabilities of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Forty-four extracted primary molars were divided into two groups, and the enamel substrate was prepared for evaluating shear bond strength. Scotchbond (3M ESPE) and Clearfil UBQ were used to bond composite-to-enamel substrates in each group (n = 22). Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing device and compared. Sixteen discs (6 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from each Clearfil UBQ, Fuji IX, and Fuji II LC. Over the course of 30 days, each materials’ fluoride release was examined and compared using ion analysis. Results revealed that Clearfil UBQ had statistically similar shear bond strength to Scotchbond. Between the three materials, Clearfil UBQ had the lowest fluoride release at baseline (0.11 ± 0.25) and the lowest cumulative fluoride release (0.12–0.27 ppm) over 30 days. Fuji IX had the highest fluoride release at baseline (19.38 ± 2.50) and cumulatively (40.87 ± 4.03 ppm), followed by Fuji II LC. We conclude that Clearfil UBQ and Scotchbond showed comparable bond strengths to the enamel. Fluoride release was seen in Clearfil UBQ in the initial two days of the 30-day period. The amount of fluoride release was significantly less than with glass ionomer cements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop