Advances in L2 Perception and Production

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 November 2023) | Viewed by 8240

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Spanish, Modern and Classic Philologies, 07122 Palma, Spain
Interests: L2 speech learning; pronunciation teaching

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures and English Studies, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: L2 phonology; L2 speech learning and teaching; phonetic training methods

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The field of second language (L2) speech learning has experienced an outburst of empirical research in the last decade. A large body of studies has attempted to provide answers to many research questions involving the underlying mechanisms in second language speech perception and production, the factors that contribute to successful learning outcomes and the intervention methods that boost L2 speech learning. In addition, in recent years, the field of pronunciation teaching and learning has consolidated an important shift of focus from nativelikeness to intelligibility and comprehensibility as a goal of L2 pronunciation instruction (Levis, 2018; Derwing & Munro, 2015), along with novel approaches to L2 speech assessment (Saito & Plonsky, 2019). However, findings from L2 speech learning research, initially triggered by now well-established L2 speech learning models such as the SLM (Flege, 1995; Flege & Bohn, 2021) and PAM-L2 (Best & Tyler, 2007), have not yet been effectively applied to pronunciation instruction. In addition, there remains a number of pending recurrent questions in L2 speech acquisition in need of further research, such as the relationship between perception and production, the role of individual differences and the effectiveness of instructional methods. With these challenging questions in mind, we welcome contributions that advance the field of L2 speech learning on topics that include (but are not limited to) the following: the relationship between perception and production, development in L2 speech learning, the role of individual differences and their interaction with contextual learning factors, pronunciation training methods and research-based instructional approaches to L2 pronunciation teaching and learning.  

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send this to the guest editors Lucrecia Rallo Fabra ([email protected]) and Joan C. Mora ([email protected]) and to the Languages editorial office ([email protected]) by March 1st 2023. Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors to ensure proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

Tentative Completion Schedule:

  • Abstract Submission Deadline: 1 March 2023    
  • Notification of Abstract Acceptance: 1 April  2023    
  • Full Manuscript Deadline: 1 November 2023  

Reference

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. Munro, M. & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Flege, (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Derwing T. M. & Munro M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: evidence-based perspectives for l2 teaching and research. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.

Flege, J. E., & Bohm, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model. In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning. Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 84–118). Cambridge University Press.

Levis, J. (2018). Intelligibility oral communication and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.

Dr. Lucrecia Rallo Fabra
Dr. Joan C. Mora
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • L2 perception
  • L2 production
  • individual differences
  • pronunciation training

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

23 pages, 5546 KiB  
Article
Investigating Adult Learners’ Perceptual and Phonolexical Representations of Novel Phonological Contrasts
by Shannon L. Barrios, Rachel Hayes-Harb and Joanne C. Moffatt
Languages 2024, 9(12), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9120369 - 30 Nov 2024
Viewed by 487
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that language learners’ auditory word recognition behavior provides evidence for independent contributions of perceptual and phonolexical representations, and learners’ patterns of auditory word recognition have been characterized as resulting from “fuzziness” or “imprecision” associated with these representations. More recently, [...] Read more.
Previous studies have shown that language learners’ auditory word recognition behavior provides evidence for independent contributions of perceptual and phonolexical representations, and learners’ patterns of auditory word recognition have been characterized as resulting from “fuzziness” or “imprecision” associated with these representations. More recently, it has been argued that representational “fuzziness” may in fact take various forms (e.g., neutralized, precise, ambiguous). The purpose of the present study is to further build on this line of work by elaborating additional logically possible scenarios by crossing larger sets of logically possible types of perceptual and phonolexical representational precision/imprecision, as an exercise in exploring the empirical and theoretical implications of our characterizations of representational fuzziness in language learners. We collect new empirical data for the purpose of demonstrating how we might evaluate auditory word recognition performance relative to this fuller set of predicted scenarios. We computed the set of hypothesized scenarios by crossing possible perceptual and lexical representations. We crossed four possible perceptual representations (NeutralizedC + NeutralizedV, NeutralizedC + PreciseV, PreciseC + NeutralizedV, or PreciseC + PreciseV) and six possible phonolexical representations (Neutralized, Ambiguous, Not X, Precise, Fuzzy Word, or Word Length), for a total of 24 scenarios, each accompanied by a set of predictions with respect to accuracy on an auditory word–picture matching test. We interpret the group and individual performance relative to these scenarios with the ultimate aim of better understanding the implications of our assumptions about the nature of perceptual and phonolexical representations relative to observed patterns of learner behavior. Our hope is that in computing this factorial typology of logically possible scenarios and demonstrating a starting point for how we might empirically evaluate its predictions, we set the stage for future research to refine the hypothesis space through empirical studies of auditory word processing in language learners. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in L2 Perception and Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1171 KiB  
Article
A Longitudinal Exploration of Perception and Production of English Codas in CLIL Settings
by Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto and Esther Gómez-Lacabex
Languages 2024, 9(9), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090303 - 19 Sep 2024
Viewed by 704
Abstract
Second language speech perception and production remain an enduring concern in second language acquisition, as research evidence seems to suggest that there is not a straightforward correspondence between these two speech domains and that their interrelationship seems to be of a complex nature. [...] Read more.
Second language speech perception and production remain an enduring concern in second language acquisition, as research evidence seems to suggest that there is not a straightforward correspondence between these two speech domains and that their interrelationship seems to be of a complex nature. The present proposal intends to contribute to the inspection of such a relationship by observing the development of perception and production skills of English codas longitudinally in a group of secondary school learners in Spain involved in a content and language integrated learning (CLIL) program, which increases exposure and production opportunities. Results point to a slight overall improvement of both sound perception and production skills during a two-year period, the coda sounds exhibiting variable realizations. Many coda sounds were found to be identified and produced at near/ceiling levels while other codas remained at less successful identification and production levels even after two years of CLIL exposure. The correlation analyses performed indicated that the two dimensions tended to correlate when the development for each coda sound was inspected. No correlations were found when students’ individual overall performance in each dimension were examined, attesting individual differences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in L2 Perception and Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 500 KiB  
Article
Delving into L2 Learners’ Perspective: Exploring the Role of Individual Differences in Self-Evaluation of L2 Speech Learning
by Yui Suzukida
Languages 2024, 9(3), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030109 - 19 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1532
Abstract
Misalignment between second language (L2) self-perception and actual ability is often observed among L2 learners. In order to further understand this phenomenon, the current study investigated how the roles of individual differences (IDs; especially experiential and cognitive IDs) influence the learners’ self-assessment accuracy. [...] Read more.
Misalignment between second language (L2) self-perception and actual ability is often observed among L2 learners. In order to further understand this phenomenon, the current study investigated how the roles of individual differences (IDs; especially experiential and cognitive IDs) influence the learners’ self-assessment accuracy. To this end, L2 speech samples elicited from 97 Japanese learners of English were analyzed via self-evaluation and expert evaluations. Subsequently, learners’ IDs profiles, including working memory, phonological memory, implicit learning and auditory processing, were linked to (a) the gap between self- and expert evaluation scores and (b) the type of inaccurate self-evaluation (i.e., overconfident vs. underconfident evaluations). The study illustrates the complex relationships between L2 learners’ linguistic knowledge, cognitive abilities, experiential profiles and self-perception. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in L2 Perception and Production)
17 pages, 4441 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Pitch Accent on the Perception of English Lexical Stress: Evidence from English and Mandarin Chinese Listeners
by Fenqi Wang, Delin Deng, Kevin Tang and Ratree Wayland
Languages 2024, 9(3), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030087 - 1 Mar 2024
Viewed by 3120
Abstract
The relative weighting of f0 and vowel reduction in English spoken word recognition at the sentence level were investigated in one two-alternative forced-choice word identification experiment. In the experiment, an H* pitch-accented or a deaccented word fragment (e.g., AR- in the word [...] Read more.
The relative weighting of f0 and vowel reduction in English spoken word recognition at the sentence level were investigated in one two-alternative forced-choice word identification experiment. In the experiment, an H* pitch-accented or a deaccented word fragment (e.g., AR- in the word archive) was presented at the end of a carrier sentence for identification. The results of the experiment revealed differences in the cue weighting of English lexical stress perception between native and non-native listeners. For native English listeners, vowel quality was a more prominent cue than f0, while native Mandarin Chinese listeners employed both vowel quality and f0 in a comparable fashion. These results suggested that (a) vowel reduction is superior to f0 in signaling initial stress in the words and (b) f0 facilitates the recognition of word initial stress, which is modulated by first language. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in L2 Perception and Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 885 KiB  
Review
A Systematic Review of Empirical Mobile-Assisted Pronunciation Studies through a Perception–Production Lens
by Anne M. Stoughton and Okim Kang
Languages 2024, 9(7), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070251 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1290
Abstract
The communicative approach to language learning, a teaching method commonly used in second language (L2) classrooms, places little to no emphasis on pronunciation training. As a result, mobile-assisted pronunciation training (MAPT) platforms provide an alternative to classroom-based pronunciation training. To date, there have [...] Read more.
The communicative approach to language learning, a teaching method commonly used in second language (L2) classrooms, places little to no emphasis on pronunciation training. As a result, mobile-assisted pronunciation training (MAPT) platforms provide an alternative to classroom-based pronunciation training. To date, there have been several meta-analyses and systematic reviews of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) studies, but only a few of these meta-analyses have concentrated on pronunciation. To better understand MAPT’s impact on L2 learners’ perceptions and production of targeted pronunciation features, this study conducted a systematic review of the MAPT literature following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Potential mobile-assisted articles were identified through searches of the ERIC, Educational Full Text, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstract, MLI International, and Scopus databases and specific journal searches. Criteria for article inclusion in this study included the following: the article must be a peer-reviewed empirical or quasi-empirical research study using both experimental and control groups to assess the impact of pronunciation training. Pronunciation training must have been conducted via MALL or MAPT technologies, and the studies must have been published between 2014 and 2024. A total of 232 papers were identified; however, only ten articles with a total of 524 participants met the established criteria. Data pertaining to the participants used in the study (nationality and education level), the MPAT applications and platforms used, the pronunciation features targeted, the concentration on perception and/or production of these features, and the methods used for training and assessments were collected and discussed. Effect sizes using Cohen’s d were also calculated for each study. The findings of this review reveal that only two of the articles assessed the impact of MAPT on L2 learners’ perceptions of targeted features, with results indicating that the use of MPAT did not significantly improve L2 learners’ abilities to perceive segmental features. In terms of production, all ten articles assessed MPAT’s impact on L2 learners’ production of the targeted features. The results of these assessments varied greatly, with some studies indicating a significant and large effect of MAPT and others citing non-significant gains and negligible effect sizes. The variation in these results, in addition to differences in the types of participants, the targeted pronunciation features, and MAPT apps and platforms used, makes it difficult to conclude that MAPT has a significant impact on L2 learners’ production. Furthermore, the selected studies’ concentration on mostly segmental features (i.e., phoneme and word pronunciation) is likely to have had only a limited impact on participants’ intelligibility. This paper provides suggestions for further MAPT research, including increased emphasis on suprasegmental features and perception assessments, to further our understanding of the effectiveness of MAPT for pronunciation training. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in L2 Perception and Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop