Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 November 2025) | Viewed by 5869

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities and Philosophy, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy
Interests: morphosyntax; phonology; Albanian; Aromanian; Italian dialects; Italian minority languages
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

An old idea supported by some authors is that morphology is a kind of ornamental property (Embick), somehow a superficial imperfection of language (Aronoff), motivated by the apparent lack of isomorphism between morphological and syntactic structures. This view appears to be simply speculative. If this were the case, we should ask ourselves why language should be committed to obscuring or complicating the relationship between interpretative (C-I) and sensorimotor (SM) systems with non-isomorphism and syncretism. Based on these considerations, the aim of this Issue is to provide a theoretical and descriptive discussion of the most crucial property of human language design, namely the relationship between syntax and syntactic categories, and the formal devices that express them. According to a traditional view, words provide the lexical content, while the rules of syntax would be responsible for the interpretative level of the sentence. In fact, in most languages, syntax is manifested through inflections and derivational affixes and other formal devices. Formal properties include morphological structure and its rules; order and other locality constraints on movement or the relationship between positions (subjacency and the articulation of categories; Rizzi 1997); and morphophonological tools such as stress distribution, often linked to focalization phenomena, and assimilative mechanisms (e.g. Raddoppiamento Fonosintattico, propagation, metaphony). All these aspects are engaged in making the syntactic objects interpretable, through transfer and externalization, at the SM and C-I interpretive systems. Morphosyntax is, therefore, a substantial topic that generativists address based on a strong hypothesis on the nature of linguistic design. Our aim is to combine the reflection of partially different conceptual perspectives towards an articulated and in-depth analysis of this interface, in view of different sensibilities, experiences, and facts of language. In this sense, the Issue will be able to integrate the existing literature, enriching the specific research on the relevant points, with particular attention to the phase model and Chomsky’s recent work.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors (Email A) or to the Languages editorial office (languages@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

References

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2021. Minimalism: Where Are We Now, and Where Can We Hope to Go. Gengo Kenkyu 160: 1-41.

Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambrigde, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–339. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Prof. Dr. Leonardo Maria Savoia
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • syntax
  • morphology
  • morphophonology
  • order and movement
  • prosody
  • morphosyntax

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 1402 KB  
Article
Alternations in Third Person Accusative Proclitics and Definite Articles in Some Southern Italian Dialects
by Laura Bafile
Languages 2026, 11(4), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11040073 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 211
Abstract
Several southern Italian dialects show a systematic alternation in the forms of the third person object clitic between proclisis and enclisis; moreover, in proclisis, the object clitic and the definite article have different forms that alternate between prevocalic and preconsonantal contexts. On the [...] Read more.
Several southern Italian dialects show a systematic alternation in the forms of the third person object clitic between proclisis and enclisis; moreover, in proclisis, the object clitic and the definite article have different forms that alternate between prevocalic and preconsonantal contexts. On the whole, the distribution of forms constitutes a varied and complex picture, which has often been treated in terms of allomorphy. In particular, this article examines the arrangement of proclitic forms in the Neapolitan variety in which the forms are distributed according to three different patterns. The article explores the possibility of analysing the alternations in purely phonological terms, using the representational tools of “floating melody”, “stress space” and “virtual geminate”. The results obtained are encouraging: while some alternations have proven to be allomorphic in nature, a unified phonological explanation has been developed for challenging issues, including the so-called “l-deletion” and the corresponding vowel lengthening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
24 pages, 411 KB  
Article
V2 and Subject-Verb Inversion in Ladin and Romansh
by Leonardo Maria Savoia and Benedetta Baldi
Languages 2026, 11(3), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11030040 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 372
Abstract
In this article, we analyze the order verb-(clitic) subject that characterizes Rhaeto-Romance languages in V2 and interrogative contexts. In these varieties, the subject is necessarily realized by lexical or pronominal elements in preverbal position, except in inversion contexts. Some of these varieties have [...] Read more.
In this article, we analyze the order verb-(clitic) subject that characterizes Rhaeto-Romance languages in V2 and interrogative contexts. In these varieties, the subject is necessarily realized by lexical or pronominal elements in preverbal position, except in inversion contexts. Some of these varieties have subject clitics (SCls) that display a distribution similar to that of full pronouns. Furthermore, in some, subject-verb inversion involves the enclisis of SCls on the verb. Enclitics are distributionally different from proclitics and are characterized by distinct paradigms, which show specialized properties somewhat comparable to inflections. We will study subject syntax in inversion contexts within the Phase framework, where enclitics will be viewed as the result of syntactic Merge and of amalgamation with the verb stem in INFL. A crucial topic is the relationship between functional morphemes and spelling domains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
24 pages, 898 KB  
Article
A Unified Morphosyntactic Analysis of Reduplication as Inclusion
by Ludovico Franco and Paolo Lorusso
Languages 2026, 11(3), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11030038 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 783
Abstract
This paper proposes a unified analysis of reduplication as the lexical spell-out of a relational part–whole/inclusion predicate (⊆) in morphosyntax. Adopting the framework of Manzini and colleagues, we argue that reduplicative morphology—across diverse languages and domains—encodes a subset relation, whereby an event, individual, [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a unified analysis of reduplication as the lexical spell-out of a relational part–whole/inclusion predicate (⊆) in morphosyntax. Adopting the framework of Manzini and colleagues, we argue that reduplicative morphology—across diverse languages and domains—encodes a subset relation, whereby an event, individual, or property is interpreted as included in a larger set or continuum of similar instances. We bring evidence from a range of typologically diverse languages (Tagalog, Bikol, Malay, Fulfulde, Italian, and sign languages) to show that reduplication correlates with non-maximality: plural number (members of a set), distributivity (individuals/events taken one by one), iterative aspect (sub-events in a larger event), and evaluative attenuation or intensification (a degree as part of a scale). The analysis is developed in a formal syntactic representation where reduplication is triggered by an elementary inclusion operator (⊆) at the X or XP level. We show that a single semantic primitive (⊆) can account for the varied meanings of reduplication in nominal, verbal, and adjectival domains. We discuss the implications of this unified approach, suggesting that reduplication is not a mere iconic or phonological process, but rather the surface reflex of a fundamental grammatical operation of inclusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
24 pages, 1049 KB  
Article
Dative Experiencer Psych-Verbs in Italian and Spanish
by Tania Stortini
Languages 2026, 11(3), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11030036 - 26 Feb 2026
Viewed by 624
Abstract
This study investigates how argument structure interacts with Information Structure (IS) in Dative Experiencer (DE) psych-verbs of the piacere/gustar type in Italian and Spanish. These verbs display non-canonical mapping between thematic and grammatical roles, in which the Experiencer surfaces as a dative object [...] Read more.
This study investigates how argument structure interacts with Information Structure (IS) in Dative Experiencer (DE) psych-verbs of the piacere/gustar type in Italian and Spanish. These verbs display non-canonical mapping between thematic and grammatical roles, in which the Experiencer surfaces as a dative object and the Theme as the subject. Through a semi-spontaneous production experiment based on the Question with a Delayed Answer (QDA) methodology, the study elicited natural utterances to investigate how speakers encode Information Focus (IF) on the Theme. The results show a consistent pattern across the two languages, with a strong preference for postverbal realizations of the Theme and frequent overt expression of the Experiencer, interpreted as a Familiar Topic. Preliminary prosodic data further support this interpretation, showing that the Experiencer bears a low tonal contour typical of given material, whereas the postverbal subject has included in the prosodic boundary of the sentence. Taken together, these findings suggest that DE psych-verbs encode a grammar-internal mechanism that links thematic and informational hierarchies, where morphosyntactic structure, case, position and prosody jointly contribute to the interpretability of discourse relations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 446 KB  
Article
Bantu Verbal Extensions Between Morphology and Syntax
by Gloria Cocchi
Languages 2025, 10(11), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10110284 - 13 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1643
Abstract
Bantu languages represent a typical example of how morphology and syntax are deeply intertwined. Indeed, these agglutinative languages employ affixes, hence morphemes, to express relations that in other languages—like Italian or English—are conveyed by independent words, in syntax. In particular, in this work, [...] Read more.
Bantu languages represent a typical example of how morphology and syntax are deeply intertwined. Indeed, these agglutinative languages employ affixes, hence morphemes, to express relations that in other languages—like Italian or English—are conveyed by independent words, in syntax. In particular, in this work, I am going to discuss Bantu causative and applicative constructions, which are formed by means of verbal extensions, i.e., affixes that adjoin to verb stems in order to derive complex syntactic structures. Through the comparison with other languages, in particular Italian and English, we will argue that a biclausal analysis of Bantu causatives is tenable and, even more, this analysis can be extended to applicative and ditransitive verbs, taking into consideration the different behaviour of symmetrical and asymmetrical Bantu languages. Finally, we will discuss the peculiar situation of Italian, which behaves like symmetrical Bantu languages as concerns object pronominalization in the complex constructions under analysis; we will conclude that the co-occurrence of clitic pronouns is linked to their different morphological forms, which suggests that they occupy different positions in the clitic/affix string, underlying once more how morphology and syntax feed each other. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
15 pages, 307 KB  
Article
Evaluative Morphology and the Syntax of Adjectives in Italian
by Denis Delfitto and Chiara Melloni
Languages 2025, 10(11), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10110270 - 24 Oct 2025
Viewed by 938
Abstract
This paper addresses a well-known puzzle at the intersection of morphology and syntax: the categorical exclusion of adjectives modified by evaluative morphology from prenominal position in Italian. While Italian allows many adjectives to occur both pre- and postnominally, adjectives like piccolino, ‘little-dim’, [...] Read more.
This paper addresses a well-known puzzle at the intersection of morphology and syntax: the categorical exclusion of adjectives modified by evaluative morphology from prenominal position in Italian. While Italian allows many adjectives to occur both pre- and postnominally, adjectives like piccolino, ‘little-dim’, are strictly postnominal (cane piccolino, lit. ‘dog little-dim’ vs. *piccolino cane, ‘little-dim dog’), a distribution not fully explained by their proposed predicative or intersective nature. Drawing on degree semantics and trope theory, we argue that this constraint arises from an incompatibility between two distinct interpretive strategies. Prenominal adjectives undergo a syntactically driven semantic shift, whereby the noun triggers a trope-based interpretation of the adjective, redefining the meaning of the A-N complex. In contrast, evaluative morphology operates through a pragmatically driven strategy, contributing speaker-oriented, context-sensitive meaning to the adjective. Crucially, these two strategies are mutually exclusive: an adjective modified by evaluative morphology has already undergone pragmatic reinterpretation and cannot simultaneously participate in the compositional syntactic process required for prenominal placement. This explains why adjectives with evaluative suffixes are excluded from prenominal contexts, despite often yielding intersective interpretations postnominally. Our proposal accounts for this distributional asymmetry without resorting to stipulations and suggests that certain interpretive procedures are not recursively applicable across syntax and pragmatics. Ultimately, this study sheds new light on a principled interface constraint linking syntactic distribution, morphological derivation and pragmatic interpretation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)
Back to TopTop