Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.2
2.9
Journals
JCM
Special Issues
Innovations in Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcomes for Myopia and...
jcm-logo
Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for JCM Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Innovations in Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcomes for Myopia and Ocular Disorders

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Ophthalmology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 February 2026 | Viewed by 982

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Clara Martinez-Perez

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ISEC LISBOA—Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências,1750-179 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: myopia; binocular vision; epidemiology; eye disorders; refractive errors
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to explore the latest advances in personalized therapy and clinical outcomes for myopia and other ocular conditions. With the global prevalence of myopia rising sharply—particularly among children and young adults—there is an urgent need for effective, individualized interventions. At the same time, a wide range of ocular disorders continue to pose significant public health challenges worldwide.

We are particularly interested in clinical approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and management, including pharmacological, optical, surgical, and behavioral strategies. Contributions that address innovations in diagnostics, digital tools, artificial intelligence, and sustainability in eye care are especially welcome.

By bringing together multidisciplinary perspectives, this Special Issue seeks to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, promote collaborative innovation, and highlight both emerging technologies and persistent challenges in the field. We invite original research articles and comprehensive reviews that contribute to advancing individualized care and improving clinical outcomes in myopia and other visual disorders.

Dr. Clara Martinez-Perez
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • myopia
  • refractive errors
  • visual development
  • childhood eye disorders
  • vision screening
  • diagnostic tools in optometry
  • vision-related quality of life
  • therapeutic strategies in optometry
  • artificial intelligence
  • public health
  • eye care innovation
  • multidisciplinary vision science

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 931 KB  
Article
Spherical Equivalent Percentile Curves in a Portuguese School-Aged Population
by María Ibeth Peñaloza-Barbosa, Clara Martinez-Perez, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena and Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7262; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207262 - 14 Oct 2025
Viewed by 244
Abstract
Bacground/Objectives: This study aimed to develop age- and sex-specific spherical equivalent (SE) percentile curves and estimate the prevalence of refractive errors (REs) in Portuguese schoolchildren aged 6–17 years. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three schools in Lisbon, including 2205 [...] Read more.
Bacground/Objectives: This study aimed to develop age- and sex-specific spherical equivalent (SE) percentile curves and estimate the prevalence of refractive errors (REs) in Portuguese schoolchildren aged 6–17 years. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three schools in Lisbon, including 2205 children (mean age = 9.3 ± 2.6 years; 49.3% boys). Vision was assessed using non-cycloplegic static retinoscopy (chosen due to feasibility in school settings) and visual acuity tests. SE percentile curves (P5–P95) were generated by age and sex. SE values and RE distribution (hyperopia, emmetropia, and myopia) were compared across four age groups (6–8, 9–11, 12–14, and 15–17 years). Results: SE values decreased significantly with age (p < 0.001). Median SE ranged from +0.50 D (6–8 years) to 0.00 D (15–17 years), with no sex differences. Hyperopia predominated in younger children (60.6% at 6–8 years), whereas myopia increased in older ages (32.2% at 15–17 years). Conclusions: This study presents the first SE percentile curves for Portuguese schoolchildren, providing a practical, age-specific reference for vision screening. The progressive shift from hyperopia to myopia highlights the importance of early detection and monitoring to prevent visual impairment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcomes for Myopia and Ocular Disorders)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1576 KB  
Article
Comparing Close-Field and Open-Field Autorefractometry and Subjective Refraction
by Veronica Noya-Padin, Noelia Nores-Palmas, Belen Sabucedo-Villamarin, Maria J. Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel and Hugo Pena-Verdeal
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5680; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165680 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 589
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Autorefractometers are valuable tools in clinical practice, but their accuracy is often questioned, especially in the pediatric population. This study aimed to compare refraction data from open-field and close-field autorefractometers and subjective refraction without using cycloplegia. Methods: A total of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Autorefractometers are valuable tools in clinical practice, but their accuracy is often questioned, especially in the pediatric population. This study aimed to compare refraction data from open-field and close-field autorefractometers and subjective refraction without using cycloplegia. Methods: A total of 50 eyes of 50 participants (19 males and 31 females, 11.8 ± 1.56 years) were evaluated. In a single visit, objective refraction was performed using NVision-K 5001 (open-field) and Visionix VX120 (close-field) autorefractometers, and subjective refraction using the fogging technique. Differences between procedures were assessed for sphere, spherical equivalent, and cylindrical vectors J0 and J45 using the Friedman test, followed by the post hoc Wilcoxon test as needed. Results: Significant differences were found in the sphere between the three procedures (all p ≤ 0.032). For the spherical equivalent, the Visionix VX120 differed significantly with the other two techniques (both p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were found between NVision-K 5001 and subjective refraction (p = 0.193). Finally, no significant differences were observed for J0 and J45 vectors among the procedures (both p ≥ 0.166). Conclusions: There are certain discrepancies between autorefractometers and the subjective assessment of refractive error, most evident in measurements taken with the close-field device, possibly due to greater accommodative stimulation. However, in contexts such as visual screening or as a preliminary guide in the clinic, the values obtained by autorefractometry can provide useful information. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcomes for Myopia and Ocular Disorders)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop