New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "General Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 March 2024) | Viewed by 5747

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojimaminamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0046, Japan
Interests: surgery; hepatobiliary and pancreas; laparoscopic surgery; gastrointestinal surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Minimally invasive surgery has made remarkable progress; today not only laparoscopic surgery but also robotic surgery has become widespread. Minimally invasive treatment of organs such as the hepatobiliary and pancreatic organs, which were previously difficult to treat by laparoscopy or robotic surgery, is now possible, and new knowledge such as microanatomy has been obtained in gastrointestinal surgery.

In such an era, we invite you to participate in this Special Issue entitled "New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery" to discuss new techniques, microanatomy, and postoperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery from a wide range of fields, including gynecology and urology. In addition, comparisons between robotic and laparoscopic surgery are also welcome.

Dr. Kentaro Iwaki
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • laparoscopic surgery
  • robotic surgery
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • gastroenterology
  • digestive tract
  • hepato-biliary pancreas
  • obstetrics and gynecology
  • urology

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

10 pages, 434 KiB  
Article
Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score as a Predictor for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
by Paola Aceto, Roberto De Cicco, Claudia Calabrese, Irene Marusco, Filippo Del Tedesco, Ersilia Luca, Cristina Modesti, Teresa Sacco, Liliana Sollazzi, Luigi Ciccoritti, Francesco Greco, Piero Giustacchini, Francesco Pennestrì, Pierpaolo Gallucci and Marco Raffaelli
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2252; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082252 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 558
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery provides many benefits including lower postoperative pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, shorter hospital stays, and improved quality of recovery. However, the anaesthetic management of obese patients requires caution in determining postoperative risk and in planning adequate postoperative pathways. Currently, [...] Read more.
Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery provides many benefits including lower postoperative pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, shorter hospital stays, and improved quality of recovery. However, the anaesthetic management of obese patients requires caution in determining postoperative risk and in planning adequate postoperative pathways. Currently, there are no specific indications for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in this surgical population and most decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) is able to predict ICU admission in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent LBS during a 2-year period (2017–2019). The collected data included demographics, comorbidities and surgery-related variables. Postoperative ICU admission was decided via bariatric anaesthesiologists’ evaluations, based on the high risk of postoperative cardiac or respiratory complications. Anaesthesia protocol was standardized. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: ICU admission was required in 2% (n = 15) of the 763 patients. The intermediate risk group of the OS-MRS was detected in 84% of patients, while the American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III was reported in 80% of patients. A greater OS-MRS (p = 0.01), advanced age (p = 0.04), male gender (p = 0.001), longer duration of surgery (p = 0.0001), increased number of patient comorbidities (p = 0.002), and previous abdominal surgeries (p = 0.003) were predictive factors for ICU admission. Conclusions: ICU admission in obese patients undergoing LBS is predicted by OS-MRS together with age, male gender, number of comorbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, and duration of surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1374 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of Manual Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Device for Intrauterine Polyps in Infertile Women in Both Operating and Office Settings
by Chen Wang, Hui Chen, India Morgan, Valeriya Prytkova, Belinda Kohl-Thomas, J. Preston Parry and Steven R. Lindheim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2244; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082244 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 421
Abstract
Background: Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal (mHTR) systems are widely used for removing intrauterine pathology. Given the startup and procedural costs for electrically powered mechanical units, disposable manual mHTR systems have been developed. Methods: With little published, we describe its effectiveness for [...] Read more.
Background: Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal (mHTR) systems are widely used for removing intrauterine pathology. Given the startup and procedural costs for electrically powered mechanical units, disposable manual mHTR systems have been developed. Methods: With little published, we describe its effectiveness for hysteroscopic intrauterine polypectomy. Results: One-hundred fifty-seven infertile women underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy with the manual mHTR device. Complete removal was accomplished in all but three cases, with blood loss being <10 mL and all specimens deemed sufficient for histopathologic diagnosis. Conclusions: These results suggest that the disposable manual mHTR system is effective in removing endometrial polyps. Head-to-head comparisons with other alternative technologies are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 640 KiB  
Article
Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Interrupted Stitches Repair versus Knotless Barbed Suture
by Gianluca Costa, Giovanni Maria Garbarino, Luca Lepre, Gianluca Liotta, Gianluca Mazzoni, Alice Gabrieli, Alessandro Costa, Mauro Podda, Gabriele Sganga and Pietro Fransvea
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1242; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051242 - 22 Feb 2024
Viewed by 671
Abstract
Background: Peptic ulcers result from imbalanced acid production, and in recent decades, proton pump inhibitors have proven effective in treating them. However, perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) continue to occur with a persistent high mortality rate when not managed properly. The advantages of the [...] Read more.
Background: Peptic ulcers result from imbalanced acid production, and in recent decades, proton pump inhibitors have proven effective in treating them. However, perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) continue to occur with a persistent high mortality rate when not managed properly. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach have been widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, concerning certain technical aspects of this method, such as the best gastrorrhaphy technique, the consensus remains elusive. Consequently, the choice tends to rely on individual surgical experiences. Our study aimed to compare interrupted stitches versus running barbed suture for laparoscopic PPU repair. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study utilizing propensity score matching analysis on patients who underwent laparoscopic PPU repair. Patients were categorised into two groups: Interrupted Stitches Suture (IStiS) and Knotless Suture (KnotS). We then compared the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients in both groups. Results: A total of 265 patients underwent laparoscopic PPU repair: 198 patients with interrupted stitches technique and 67 with barbed knotless suture. Following propensity score matching, each group (IStiS and KnotS) comprised 56 patients. The analysis revealed that operative time did not differ between groups: 87.9 ± 39.7 vs. 92.8 ± 42.6 min (p = 0.537). Postoperative morbidity (24.0% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.331) and Clavien–Dindo III (10.7% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.489) were more frequently observed in the KnotS group, without any significant difference. In contrast, we found a slightly higher mortality rate in the IStiS group (10.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.742). Concerning leaks, no differences emerged between groups (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.000). Conclusions: Laparoscopic PPU repair with knotless barbed sutures is a non-inferior alternative to interrupted stitches repair. Nevertheless, further research such as randomised trials, with a standardised treatment protocol according to ulcer size, are required to identify the best gastrorraphy technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 9207 KiB  
Article
Stereotactic Navigation-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of Challenging Low Pelvic Tumors: A Case Series
by Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Jung-Myun Kwak, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jin Kim and Seon-Hahn Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051233 - 21 Feb 2024
Viewed by 814
Abstract
(1) Introduction: The laparoscopic approach to low pelvic tumors is challenging and hindered by suboptimal tumor visualization and dissection, with possible oncological failure. Stereotactic navigation provides real-time image guidance that may optimize safety, accuracy, and precision when dissecting challenging low pelvic tumors. [...] Read more.
(1) Introduction: The laparoscopic approach to low pelvic tumors is challenging and hindered by suboptimal tumor visualization and dissection, with possible oncological failure. Stereotactic navigation provides real-time image guidance that may optimize safety, accuracy, and precision when dissecting challenging low pelvic tumors. (2) Methods: Preoperative CT images were acquired with eight skin-fixed fiducials and loaded into a navigation system. A patient tracker was mounted on the bed side. Patient-to-image paired point registration was performed, and an instrument tracker was mounted on a laparoscopic instrument and calibrated for instrument tracking. Surgical operations were performed with real-time stereotactic navigation assistance. (3) Results: Three patients underwent stereotactic navigation surgery. Fiducial registration errors were good to optimal (±1.9, ±3.4, and ±3.4 mm). Lesions were easily identified and targeted with real-time navigation. Surgeries were uneventful. Histopathology examinations identified one retro-rectal schwannoma, one lateral pelvic recurrence from rectal adenocarcinoma, and one advanced anal canal carcinoma. No navigation-related complications, readmissions, or postoperative mortalities were observed. (4) Conclusions: The application of laparoscopic stereotactic navigation surgery to complex low pelvic tumors is feasible and could impact oncological surgical quality by enabling tumor targeting and ensuring resection margins. Further wider series are needed to confirm stereotactic navigation’s impact on challenging low pelvic tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 2588 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Impact of Hand Dominance on Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Development Using Network Models
by Saiteja Malisetty, Elham Rastegari, Ka-Chun Siu and Hesham H. Ali
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1150; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041150 - 18 Feb 2024
Viewed by 580
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic surgery demands high precision and skill, necessitating effective training protocols that account for factors such as hand dominance. This study investigates the impact of hand dominance on the acquisition and proficiency of laparoscopic surgical skills, utilizing a novel assessment method that [...] Read more.
Background: Laparoscopic surgery demands high precision and skill, necessitating effective training protocols that account for factors such as hand dominance. This study investigates the impact of hand dominance on the acquisition and proficiency of laparoscopic surgical skills, utilizing a novel assessment method that combines Network Models and electromyography (EMG) data. Methods: Eighteen participants, comprising both medical and non-medical students, engaged in laparoscopic simulation tasks, including peg transfer and wire loop tasks. Performance was assessed using Network Models to analyze EMG data, capturing muscle activity and learning progression. The NASA Task Load Index (TLX) was employed to evaluate subjective task demands and workload perceptions. Results: Our analysis revealed significant differences in learning progression and skill proficiency between dominant and non-dominant hands, suggesting the need for tailored training approaches. Network Models effectively identified patterns of skill acquisition, while NASA-TLX scores correlated with participants’ performance and learning progression, highlighting the importance of considering both objective and subjective measures in surgical training. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of hand dominance in laparoscopic surgical training and suggests that personalized training protocols could enhance surgical precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes. By leveraging advanced analytical techniques, including Network Models and EMG data analysis, this research contributes to optimizing clinical training methodologies, potentially revolutionizing surgical education and improving patient care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 510 KiB  
Article
Association between Unplanned Conversion and Patient Survival after Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
by Boram Lee, Jai Young Cho, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Hae Won Lee, MeeYoung Kang, Yeshong Park and Jinju Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1116; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041116 - 16 Feb 2024
Viewed by 553
Abstract
Unplanned conversion (UPC) is considered to be a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. However, the effects of UPC on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent [...] Read more.
Unplanned conversion (UPC) is considered to be a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. However, the effects of UPC on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and those who underwent UPC for HCC. Among 1029 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2021, 251 were eligible for the study. Of 251 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC in PS segments, 29 (26.0%) required UPC, and 222 underwent LLR. After 1:5 PSM, 25 patients were selected for the UPC group and 125 for the LLR group. Blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and postoperative complication were higher in the UPC group. Regarding oncologic outcomes, although the 5-year overall survival rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.544), the recurrence-free survival rate was lower in the UPC group (p < 0.001). UPC was associated with poor short-term as well as inferior long-term outcomes compared with LLR for HCC in PS segments. Therefore, surgeons must carefully select patients and consider early conversion if unexpected bleeding occurs to maintain safety and oncologic outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

13 pages, 297 KiB  
Review
Underneath Images and Robots, Looking Deeper into the Pneumoperitoneum: A Narrative Review
by Guido Mazzinari, Lucas Rovira, Kim I. Albers-Warlé, Michiel C. Warlé, Pilar Argente-Navarro, Blas Flor and Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1080; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041080 - 14 Feb 2024
Viewed by 561
Abstract
Laparoscopy offers numerous advantages over open procedures, minimizing trauma, reducing pain, accelerating recovery, and shortening hospital stays. Despite other technical advancements, pneumoperitoneum insufflation has received little attention, barely evolving since its inception. We explore the impact of pneumoperitoneum on patient outcomes and advocate [...] Read more.
Laparoscopy offers numerous advantages over open procedures, minimizing trauma, reducing pain, accelerating recovery, and shortening hospital stays. Despite other technical advancements, pneumoperitoneum insufflation has received little attention, barely evolving since its inception. We explore the impact of pneumoperitoneum on patient outcomes and advocate for a minimally invasive approach that prioritizes peritoneal homeostasis. The nonlinear relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intra-abdominal volume (IAV) is discussed, emphasizing IAP titration to balance physiological effects and surgical workspace. Maintaining IAP below 10 mmHg is generally recommended, but factors such as patient positioning and surgical complexity must be considered. The depth of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is explored as another variable affecting laparoscopic conditions. While deep NMB appears favorable for surgical stillness, achieving a balance between IAP and NMB depth is crucial. Temperature and humidity management during pneumoperitoneum are crucial for patient safety and optical field quality. Despite the debate over the significance of temperature drop, humidification and the warming of insufflated gas offer benefits in peritoneal homeostasis and visual clarity. In conclusion, there is potential for a paradigm shift in pneumoperitoneum management, with dynamic IAP adjustments and careful control of insufflated gas temperature and humidity to preserve peritoneal homeostasis and improve patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

14 pages, 2744 KiB  
Systematic Review
Intrathecal Morphine and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Robotic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Zi Heng Tee, Erica Ho Ching Tsoi, Quinston Lee, Yen Sin Wong, Arron Gibson, Niamh Parsons, Shafaque Shaikh and Patrice Forget
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010137 - 26 Dec 2023
Viewed by 895
Abstract
Despite the potential benefits of intrathecal morphine (ITM), the precise role and dosing of ITM in robotic assisted surgery (RAS) remains unclear. This systematic review explores real-world evidence to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of ITM in patients undergoing RAS. In accordance with [...] Read more.
Despite the potential benefits of intrathecal morphine (ITM), the precise role and dosing of ITM in robotic assisted surgery (RAS) remains unclear. This systematic review explores real-world evidence to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of ITM in patients undergoing RAS. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and APA PsycInfo. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on exertion at 24- and 48-h time intervals, and secondary outcomes aimed to explore the side effects of ITM. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine mean differences. A risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A total of 9 RCTs involving 619 patients were included in this review, of which 298 patients were administered ITM. Significant pain score reductions were observed both at rest (MD = −27.15; 95% CI [−43.97, −10.33]; I2 = 95%; p = 0.002) and on exertion (MD = −25.88; 95% CI [−37.03, −14.72]; I2 = 79%; p = 0.0003) 24 h postoperatively in the ITM groups, accompanied by a notable decrease in postoperative IV morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h (MD = −20.13; 95% CI [−30.74, −9.52]; I2 = 77%; p = 0.0002). ITM improved pain scores both at rest and on exertion at 24 and 48 h intervals, concurrently reducing the need for postoperative opioid consumption, but at the cost of an increased incidence of adverse events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Laparoscopic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop