jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 August 2026 | Viewed by 5491

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Academic Hospital, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
Interests: hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatitis B; hepatitis C; liver cirrhosis; liver diseases; liver transplantation; cirrhosis; chronic hepatitis C; hepatology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapy for many acute or chronic liver diseases that cannot be cured with alternative therapies. Survival after transplantation has progressively increased in recent years due to the improved surgical and anesthesiologic techniques and the better clinical management in the pre- and post-transplant phases. However, the management of cardio-metabolic complications still needs to be improved, as they remain the most frequent causes of long-term mortality.

The epidemiology of liver diseases has changed profoundly in recent years; just think of the almost total disappearance of hepatitis C virus infection. Patients are more likely to present with liver diseases caused by the metabolic syndrome and excessive alcohol use. In addition, despite the application of the six-monthly surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis, a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed with HCC in the intermediate-advanced stages. More recently, selected cases of intrahepatic (ICCA) and perihilar (PCCA) cholangiocarcinoma and unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) have become indications for LT. Bacterial infections, often caused by antibiotic-resistant strains, are currently the major risk factor, together with continued excessive alcohol intake, for the development of “acute or chronic liver failure” (ACLF) or “acute alcoholic hepatitis” (AAH), both associated with high short-term mortality without LT. In the current scenario where the indications for LT are rapidly changing, it is important to highlight that the type of potential recipients has also changed profoundly. A growing percentage of patients come to LT evaluation at an advanced age, with cardio-metabolic comorbidities and with psycho-social problems that make their transplant evaluation particularly complex.

In the present Special Issue, we aim to collect several review and original articles that highlight the significant advances in the indications and in the selection process for LT. Specific chapters will be dedicated to the new oncologic indications for LT, such as HCC with extended criteria, iCCA, PCCA, and liver metastases for CRC. The advances in pharmacological treatment of HCC based on immunotherapies and/or loco-regional therapies that permit obtaining the downgrading or downstaging of HCC within accepted criteria for LT will be part of this Special Issue. Particular attention will be reserved for the use of DCD donors and the potential support of stem cell transplantation. Finally, a careful evaluation and treatment of cardiometabolic complications in the long term after LT will be reviewed.

In summary, this Special Issue will help readers to obtain an up-to-date and authoritative view of the new horizons of LT and improve the clinical management of patients with advanced liver diseases in the forthcoming future.

Dr. Pierluigi Toniutto
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • liver transplantation
  • acute or chronic liver diseases
  • hepatitis C virus infection
  • hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • cirrhosis
  • intrahepatic (ICCA), perihilar (PCCA) cholangiocarcinoma
  • unresectable liver metastases
  • acute or chronic liver failure (ACLF)
  • acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH)

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

16 pages, 877 KB  
Article
Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Candidates for Liver Transplantation and Its Impact on the Transplant Accessibility
by Simona Parisse, Flaminia Ferri, Adriano De Santis, Fabio Melandro, Mario Corona, Quirino Lai, Pierleone Lucatelli, Gianluca Mennini, Massimo Rossi and Stefano Ginanni Corradini
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3358; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093358 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 249
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is prevalent among candidates for liver transplantation (LT) and may serve as a contraindication to transplantation when extensive. Given the rising prevalence of metabolic syndrome, this study aimed to identify clinical factors associated with PVT and evaluate [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is prevalent among candidates for liver transplantation (LT) and may serve as a contraindication to transplantation when extensive. Given the rising prevalence of metabolic syndrome, this study aimed to identify clinical factors associated with PVT and evaluate its impact on access to the LT waiting list and the likelihood of undergoing transplantation. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 711 consecutive patients assessed for LT between 2008 and 2020 was included. Data on PVT and various clinical variables were collected, including reasons for exclusion from the waiting list and dropout rates. Multivariable logistic regression models with forward selection and bootstrap were constructed to assess factors associated with PVT, access to the waiting list, and LT. Results: PVT was identified in 11.6% of patients (n = 83), with advanced thrombosis observed in 21% of cases. Obesity emerged as the only independent factor significantly associated with the presence of PVT (p = 0.001, OR 2.619, 95% CI 1.577–4.352). Patients with PVT were more frequently excluded from the waiting list due to clinical contraindications compared to those without PVT (26% vs. 14%, p = 0.04). However, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate an independent association between PVT and access to the waiting list or LT. No significant differences were observed in the reasons for dropout from the waiting list between patients with and without PVT. Conclusions: PVT appears to be associated with the metabolic profile of LT candidates, particularly obesity; however, it does not significantly limit access to LT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1204 KB  
Article
Disparities in Liver Transplantation Among Native Americans and Hispanic Individuals: Insights from a Southwest Region Center in the United States of America
by Anandalakshmi Ponnaluri, Pooja Rangan, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Andrew Bell, Rebecca Postagate, Moises Ilan Nevah Rubin, Michael B. Fallon and Karn Wijarnpreecha
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(3), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15030953 - 24 Jan 2026
Viewed by 534
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease, yet racial and ethnic disparities persist across the LT continuum. This study investigated the patient-level and system-level barriers to LT and evaluated racial disparities in access and outcomes. Methods: We conducted [...] Read more.
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease, yet racial and ethnic disparities persist across the LT continuum. This study investigated the patient-level and system-level barriers to LT and evaluated racial disparities in access and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2012–2022) at Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, analyzing adult LT-referred, evaluated, waitlisted, and transplanted patients. Primary outcomes included mortality and LT barriers, assessed using competing-risk and Cox regression analyses. Results: Among 2877 LT-referred patients, 61% were Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 26% Hispanic, 8.8% Native American/Alaska Native (NA/AN), 3% Black, and 1% Asian. Compared with NHW patients, lower rates of LT evaluation and listing were observed among NA/AN (39% and 53%) and Hispanic patients (56% and 63%) versus NHW patients (51% and 64%). Patient-level financial barriers were more common among NA/AN (15.5%) and Hispanic (19.81%) individuals. Waitlist mortality was significantly higher for NA/AN (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 5.26; p < 0.01) and Hispanic (SHR: 2.92, p < 0.02) patients than for NHW patients, whereas graft survival did not differ significantly by race. Conclusions: Marked racial and ethnic disparities exist in LT access and waitlist mortality, particularly among NA/AN and Hispanic patients. Targeted interventions addressing financial and systemic barriers are critical to ensuring equitable LT access and improving transplant outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 255 KB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Hepatic Resection Option for Access to the Waiting List of a Single Regional Transplant Center in Southern Italy: Entry and Dropout Flows’ Analysis
by Roberta Vella, Duilio Pagano, Fabrizio di Francesco, Sergio Li Petri, Pasquale Bonsignore, Noemi Di Lorenzo, Sergio Calamia, Alessandro Tropea, Irene Vitale, Ivan Vella, Caterina Accardo, Sandro Gelsomino, Salvatore Vieni, Calogero Cammà, Giovanni Ferrandelli and Salvatore Gruttadauria
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8871; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248871 - 15 Dec 2025
Viewed by 388
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The increasing adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and changes in clinical management may influence access to curative treatments for patients on the liver transplant waiting list. We aimed to analyze temporal trends in LLR use and to explore the association [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The increasing adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and changes in clinical management may influence access to curative treatments for patients on the liver transplant waiting list. We aimed to analyze temporal trends in LLR use and to explore the association between the proportion of LLR and the dropout rate from the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. A secondary objective was to assess the risk of dropout or death versus curative treatment (transplantation or resection) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with non-HCC candidates using a competing-risk model. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients listed for liver transplantation between 2015 and 2023. Annual rates of LLR and dropout were calculated, and their correlation was evaluated using Spearman’s rho. The risk of dropout/death and competing curative events (OLT, resection, or thermal ablation) was assessed using Fine–Gray competing-risk regression, adjusted for HCC status. Results: From 2015 to 2023, LLR accounted for a progressively increasing proportion of liver resections. A significant negative correlation was observed between annual LLR rates and dropout rates (ρ = −0.78, p = 0.008), indicating fewer ITT failures with greater LLR adoption. In the competing-risk analysis, HCC patients had a significantly lower subdistribution hazard for dropout/death (SHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42, p < 0.001) and a higher probability of receiving a curative treatment (SHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.40–1.94, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The increased use of LLR was associated with improved access to curative therapies and a reduced dropout risk on the liver transplant waiting list. HCC patients showed a more favorable competing-risk profile compared with non-HCC candidates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation)

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

18 pages, 1225 KB  
Review
Beyond the Graft: Optimizing Post-Transplant Care in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
by Chiara Becchetti, Raffaella Viganò, Francesca Aprile, Miki Scaravaglio, Giovanni Vitale, Giovanni Perricone, Chiara Mazzarelli, Marcello Vangeli, Luca Saverio Belli, Marco Carbone and Maria Cristina Morelli
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3480; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093480 - 1 May 2026
Viewed by 444
Abstract
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by fibro-inflammatory lesions of the biliary tree. In the absence of available, effective medical therapies, many patients progress to liver failure, making PSC one of the leading indications for liver transplantation (LT), [...] Read more.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by fibro-inflammatory lesions of the biliary tree. In the absence of available, effective medical therapies, many patients progress to liver failure, making PSC one of the leading indications for liver transplantation (LT), despite its rarity. While LT in PSC is associated with good overall short- and long-term survival, post-transplant outcomes are limited by recurrent PSC (rPSC), which affects up to one quarter of PSC recipients with a significant risk of graft loss and re-transplantation. The risk of rPSC reflects a complex interaction between donor and recipient factors including associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and long-term exposure to immunosuppression. Therefore, post-transplant management requires an individualized multidisciplinary approach and tailored immunosuppressive regimens aimed at balancing the risk of rejection and rPSC with the risk of infection and malignancy. Optimal control of IBD has emerged as a key modifiable determinant of rPSC risk and post-transplant outcomes. In addition, patients with PSC, particularly PSC-IBD patients, carry a significantly increased risk of hepatobiliary and colorectal cancer. Importantly, this oncological risk persists after LT. Thus, long-term, structured cancer surveillance must remain an integral component of post-transplant care. Looking ahead, novel therapies targeting shared hepatic and intestinal fibro-inflammatory pathways are currently being investigated to modify disease activity in the pre-transplant setting. Future studies are needed to assess whether these agents might be applicable also in the post-transplant setting to improve long-term graft and patient survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

14 pages, 613 KB  
Systematic Review
Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review
by Elena Garlatti Costa, Davide Bitetto, Ezio Fornasiere, Elisa Fumolo, Alberto Ferrarese and Pierluigi Toniutto
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4619; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134619 - 30 Jun 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3365
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) have significantly improved the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). In the general population, these drugs have additional benefits, such as weight loss, improvement of liver steatosis, and a cardiorenal protective effect. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) have significantly improved the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). In the general population, these drugs have additional benefits, such as weight loss, improvement of liver steatosis, and a cardiorenal protective effect. However, data regarding the effects of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2Is in the treatment of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), obesity, and their potential cardiorenal protective effects in liver transplant (LT) recipients remain limited. PTDM increases the risk of developing graft steatosis, experiencing major cardiovascular events (MACEs), and developing chronic kidney disease and reduces long-term survival in LT recipients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2Is in the treatment of PTDM in LT recipients. Methods: Twelve retrospective studies (five specifically conducted in LT recipients and seven in mixed solid organ transplant cohorts, including LT recipients) that collectively enrolled 402 LT recipients treated with GLP-1RAs and/or SGLT-2Is for PTDM were selected. Results: GLP-1Ras and SGLT-2Is reduced serum glycated hemoglobin levels, body weight, and insulin requirements in LT recipients. Some studies reported benefits in reducing graft steatosis, improving renal function, and in reducing the occurrence of MACEs. Common adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms, which rarely required treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2Is represent promising treatment options for PTDM in LT recipients, offering metabolic benefits with manageable side effects. However, further prospective studies are needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy, as well as the favorable impact on patient survival, of these drugs in LT recipients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Up-to-Date Research in Liver Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop