jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Colorectal Surgery: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 December 2025 | Viewed by 599

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Epidemiology, IQVIA, 60549 Frankfurt, Germany
Interests: epidemiology; gastroenterology; diabetology; oncology; gynecology; psychiatry

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Colorectal surgery, which includes procedures involving the colon, rectum, and anus, is a critical field in the treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders, including colorectal cancer, diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and more. Advances in surgical techniques have significantly improved patient outcomes, reduced recovery times, and minimized complications. Among the key developments in this field are the contrasting approaches of minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques.

Open surgery often results in longer hospital stays, increased pain, and a higher risk of infection. In contrast, minimally invasive surgery employs smaller incisions, specialized instruments, and sometimes robotic assistance to perform the same procedures with greater precision. These techniques have been associated with reduced postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes.

We hope to investigate all aspects of colorectal surgery. We await receiving original articles, reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical research. With this Special Issue, we aim also to provide a 'view' of the current practice and future perspectives of colorectal surgery.

Prof. Dr. Karel Kostev
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • colorectal surgery
  • minimal invasive surgery
  • open surgery
  • robot assisted surgery
  • colorectal cancer
  • stomach cancer
  • pancreatic cancer
  • diverticular disease

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 434 KiB  
Article
Can 3D Imaging Improve Results in Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery?
by Juan Cintas-Catena, Andrea Balla, Javier Valdes-Hernandez, Luis Cristóbal Capitán-Morales, Salvador Morales-Conde and Juan Carlos Gómez-Rosado
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134437 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 352
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this prospective comparative study is to report our experience with 3D laparoscopy in terms of surgeon’s discomfort with 3D vision, and to compare clinical outcomes with 2D laparoscopy in oncological colorectal surgery. Methods: From 2016 to 2017, all consecutive [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this prospective comparative study is to report our experience with 3D laparoscopy in terms of surgeon’s discomfort with 3D vision, and to compare clinical outcomes with 2D laparoscopy in oncological colorectal surgery. Methods: From 2016 to 2017, all consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery for malignancy were enrolled. Based on surgery, patients were grouped as follows: group A, right hemicolectomy; group B, left hemicolectomy; group C, sigmoidectomy; and group D, anterior resection of the rectum. Results: In total, 171 patients were included, of which 61 were in group A (45 3D and 16 2D), 18 in group B (15 3D and 3 2D), 44 in group C (30 3D and 14 2D) and 48 in group D (36 3D and 12 2D). The surgeon’s discomfort did not occur due to the 3D vision. Complication rate and mean length of hospital stay (LOS) were lower in the 3D group in comparison to 2D, even if without statistically significant differences, in group B (6.6% versus 66.6% and LOS 6.1 ± 5.2 versus 23 ± 21 days), C (6.7% versus 21.4% and LOS 5.9 ± 2.5 versus 9 ± 8.4 days) and D (27.8% versus 50% and LOS 11.9 ± 16 versus 13 ± 11.8 days), respectively. Conclusions: Despite the lack of statistically significant differences between 2D and 3D laparoscopy, this study reports promising trends in favor of 3D laparoscopy, particularly for complex procedures such as anterior resection. Further randomized prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are necessary to conclusively determine the clinical impact of 3D laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Colorectal Surgery: Current Practice and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop