State-of-the-Art in Aortic Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "General Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 July 2024) | Viewed by 4208

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Interests: aortic disease; structural heart disease; heart team; interventional techniques

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The surgical treatment of aortic disease has evolved significantly over the past decade, with a shift in focus from the treatment of acutely diseased aortic areas towards the lifetime management of aortic disease. This has lead to more radical strategies to treat aortic disease during the initial operation to avoid long-term complications.

Additionally, interventional techniques are increasingly performed and often combined with surgical treatment itself as “hybrid techniques”.

With this Special Issue, we welcome authors to submit papers on contemporary treatments of aortic disease, with a special focus on hybrid and interventional techniques and with special emphasis on heart team/vascular team approaches and the lifetime management of aortic disease.

Dr. Miriam Silaschi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hybrid techniques
  • aortic disease
  • interventional treatment
  • lifetime management of aortic disease
  • aortic dissection
  • frozen elephant trunk
  • connective tissue disease

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 1046 KiB  
Article
Acute Aortic Dissection during Pregnancy: Hideous Clinical Quandaries with Young Lives on the Line—The Role of Hereditary Genetic Syndromes
by Josephina Haunschild, Paulina Wiktorowska, Sandra Eifert, Holger Stepan, Ingo Dähnert, Michael A. Borger and Christian D. Etz
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4901; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164901 - 20 Aug 2024
Viewed by 506
Abstract
Objective: Acute aortic dissection is a rare but frequently fatal aortic catastrophe with high morbidity and mortality. Especially in pregnant patients, acute dissection is often misdiagnosed putting two lives on the line. Due to its scarcity, only case reports have been reported. The [...] Read more.
Objective: Acute aortic dissection is a rare but frequently fatal aortic catastrophe with high morbidity and mortality. Especially in pregnant patients, acute dissection is often misdiagnosed putting two lives on the line. Due to its scarcity, only case reports have been reported. The aim of this study is to analyze the time of aortic dissection during the course of pregnancy and the outcome of emergency surgery in pregnant women with and without hereditary connective tissue disorder. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all acute aortic dissections (type A and B) who underwent emergency aortic surgery at our institution between 1994 and 2022 and identified 13 patients with acute aortic dissection during pregnancy or directly postpartum. Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 13 included patients, 5 had a genetic syndrome. These patients were significantly younger at the time of dissection and at an earlier stage of pregnancy (second trimester). Even though operative and in-house mortality was zero, we lost one patient on postoperative day 14 due to rupture of the aortic root after transfer to another hospital. Survival of neonates was 77% including two aborted pregnancies. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of acute aortic dissection during pregnancy can be performed with excellent operative mortality for the mothers and satisfying survival of their neonates. In patients with genetic syndrome, dissection occurs during the early second trimester, whereas non-syndromic patients experience acute dissection in the late third trimester. Long-term follow-up is essential for timely re-intervention, if needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Aortic Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 53246 KiB  
Article
From Biomechanical Properties to Morphological Variations: Exploring the Interplay between Aortic Valve Cuspidity and Ascending Aortic Aneurysm
by Ivars Brecs, Sandra Skuja, Vladimir Kasyanov, Valerija Groma, Martins Kalejs, Simons Svirskis, Iveta Ozolanta and Peteris Stradins
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4225; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144225 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 601
Abstract
Background: This research explores the biomechanical and structural characteristics of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs), focusing on the differences between bicuspid aortic valve aneurysms (BAV-As) and tricuspid aortic valve aneurysms (TAV-As) with non-dilated aortas to identify specific traits of ATAAs. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: This research explores the biomechanical and structural characteristics of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs), focusing on the differences between bicuspid aortic valve aneurysms (BAV-As) and tricuspid aortic valve aneurysms (TAV-As) with non-dilated aortas to identify specific traits of ATAAs. Methods: Clinical characteristics, laboratory indices, and imaging data from 26 adult patients operated on for aneurysms (BAV-A: n = 12; TAV-A: n = 14) and 13 controls were analyzed. Biomechanical parameters (maximal aortic diameter, strain, and stress) and structural analyses (collagen fiber organization, density, fragmentation, adipocyte deposits, and immune cell infiltration) were assessed. Results: Significant differences in biomechanical parameters were observed. Median maximal strain was 40.0% (control), 63.4% (BAV-A), and 45.3% (TAV-A); median maximal stress was 0.59 MPa (control), 0.78 MPa (BAV-A), and 0.48 MPa (TAV-A). BAV-A showed higher tangential modulus and smaller diameter, with substantial collagen fragmentation (p < 0.001 vs. TAV and controls). TAV-A exhibited increased collagen density (p = 0.025), thickening between media and adventitia layers, and disorganized fibers (p = 0.036). BAV-A patients had elevated adipocyte deposits and immune cell infiltration. Conclusions: This study highlights distinct pathological profiles associated with different valve anatomies. BAV-A is characterized by smaller diameters, higher biomechanical stress, and significant collagen deterioration, underscoring the necessity for tailored clinical strategies for effective management of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Aortic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1202 KiB  
Article
Impact of Intercostal Artery Reinsertion on Neurological Outcome after Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement: A 25-Year Single-Center Experience
by Florian Helms, Reza Poyanmehr, Heike Krüger, Bastian Schmack, Alexander Weymann, Aron-Frederik Popov, Arjang Ruhparwar, Andreas Martens and Ruslan Natanov
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(3), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030832 - 31 Jan 2024
Viewed by 713
Abstract
Background: Intercostal artery reinsertion (ICAR) during thoracoabdominal aortic replacement remains controversial. While some groups recommend the reinsertion of as many arteries as possible, others consider the sacrifice of multiple intercostals practicable. This study investigates the impact of intercostal artery reinsertion or sacrifice on [...] Read more.
Background: Intercostal artery reinsertion (ICAR) during thoracoabdominal aortic replacement remains controversial. While some groups recommend the reinsertion of as many arteries as possible, others consider the sacrifice of multiple intercostals practicable. This study investigates the impact of intercostal artery reinsertion or sacrifice on neurological outcomes and long-term survival after thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Methods: A total of 349 consecutive patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic replacement at our institution between 1996 and 2021 were analyzed in a retrospective single-center study. ICAR was performed in 213 patients, while all intercostal arteries were ligated and sacrificed in the remaining cases. The neurological outcome was analyzed regarding temporary and permanent paraplegia or paraparesis. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the ICAR and non ICAR groups regarding the cumulative endpoint of transient and permanent spinal cord-related complications (12.2% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.9). Operation, bypass, and cross-clamp times were significantly longer in the ICAR group. Likewise, prolonged mechanical ventilation was more often necessary in the ICAR group (26.4% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.03). Overall long-term survival was similar in both groups in the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Conclusion: Omitting ICAR during thoracoabdominal aortic replacement may reduce operation and cross-clamp times and thus minimize the duration of intraoperative spinal cord hypoperfusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Aortic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3007 KiB  
Article
The Long-Term Outcome and Quality of Life after Replacement of the Ascending Aorta
by Marwan Hamiko, Katja Jahnel, Julia Rogaczewski, Myriam Schafigh, Miriam Silaschi, Andre Spaeth, Markus Velten, Wilhelm Roell, Ali El-Sayed Ahmad and Farhad Bakhtiary
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4498; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134498 - 5 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1931
Abstract
(1) Background: Despite optimal surgical therapy, replacement of the ascending aorta leads to a significant reduction in the quality of life (QoL). However, an optimal result includes maintaining and improving the QoL. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcome [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Despite optimal surgical therapy, replacement of the ascending aorta leads to a significant reduction in the quality of life (QoL). However, an optimal result includes maintaining and improving the QoL. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and the QoL in patients with aneurysms in the ascending aorta; (2) Methods: Between 2014 and 2020, 121 consecutive patients who underwent replacement of the ascending aorta were included in this study. Acute aortic pathologies were excluded. A standard short form (SF)-36 questionnaire was sent to the 112 survivors. According to the surgical procedure, patients were divided into two groups (A: supracoronary replacement of the aorta, n = 35 and B: Wheat-, David- or Bentall-procedures, n = 86). The QoL was compared within these groups and to the normal population, including myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery disease (CAD) and cancer (CAN) patients; (3) Results: 83 patients were males (68.6%) with a mean age of 62.0 ± 12.5 years. Early postoperative outcomes showed comparable results between groups A and B, with a higher re-thoracotomy rate in B (A: 0.0% vs. B: 22.1%, p = 0.002). The 30-day mortality was zero. Overall, mortality during the follow-up was 7.4%. The SF-36 showed a significant decay in both the Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) in comparison to the normal population (PCS: 41.1 vs. 48.4, p < 0.001; MCS: 42.1 vs. 50.9, p < 0.001) but without significant difference between both groups. Compared to the MI and CAD patients, significantly higher PCS but lower MCS scores were detected (p < 0.05); (4) Conclusions: Replacement of the ascending aorta shows low risk regarding the operative and postoperative outcomes with satisfying long-term results in the QoL. The extent of the surgical procedure does not influence the postoperative QoL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Aortic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop