jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Presbyopia, Laser, Cataract and Refractive Surgery: State-of-the-Art Research: Second Edition

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Ophthalmology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 May 2026 | Viewed by 1215

Special Issue Editor

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: corneal grafts; cataract surgery; refractive surgery; LASIK; PRK; intraocular lenses; phakic lenses
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Presbyopia, cataract, and refractive disorders continue to represent major challenges in ophthalmology, while also driving some of the most dynamic innovations in surgical vision correction. Advances in femtosecond laser technology, premium intraocular lenses, and novel corneal and phakic lens-based procedures are rapidly expanding treatment options and improving patient-centered outcomes. At the same time, research in ocular biomechanics, optical performance, and visual quality is shaping the future of individualized care.

With this Special Issue, “Presbyopia, Laser, Cataract and Refractive Surgery: State-of-the-Art Research: Second Edition”, we invite clinicians and researchers to contribute their latest findings and perspectives. Original research articles, clinical studies, systematic reviews, and state-of-the-art updates are welcome. We particularly encourage submissions addressing new surgical techniques, long-term outcomes, patient-reported quality of life, and translational approaches that bridge basic science and clinical practice.

Our goal is to create a comprehensive resource that reflects the current state of knowledge, stimulates scientific exchange, and outlines future directions in the management of presbyopia, cataract, and refractive disorders. We look forward to receiving your valuable contributions and to shaping this Special Issue into a reference point for both clinical and research communities.

Dr. Ivo Guber
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • presbyopia
  • cataract surgery
  • refractive surgery
  • femtosecond laser
  • intraocular lenses
  • corneal refractive procedures
  • phakic intraocular lenses
  • visual outcomes
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • surgical innovations

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1562 KB  
Article
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Cataract Surgery with Implantation of Either a Partial-Depth of Field Extended or Monofocal Intraocular Lens
by Helena Noguera, Ignacio Gutiérrez Santamaría, Iñaki Basterra, Sergio Díaz Gómez, Angelica Pérez, Gorka Lauzirika and David P. Piñero
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 830; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020830 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 912
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes following cataract surgery with implantation of a new partial depth of field (DOFi) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL of identical material, platform, and haptic design. Methods: Single-center, non-randomized trial including 55 patients randomly [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes following cataract surgery with implantation of a new partial depth of field (DOFi) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL of identical material, platform, and haptic design. Methods: Single-center, non-randomized trial including 55 patients randomly assigned to be implanted either with the partial-DOFi IOL Tecnis PureSee (partial-DOFi group, 29 patients) or the Tecnis monofocal IOL DCB00/ZCU (both Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) (monofocal group, 26 patients). Monocular visual acuity (VA), refractive, binocular defocus curve, and patient-reported outcomes (QoV and Catquest 9SF questionnaires) were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Results: No significant differences between monofocal and partial-DOFi groups were found in monocular postoperative uncorrected- (0.03 ± 0.08 vs. 0.05 ± 0.10, p = 0.419) and corrected-distance VA (−0.03 ± 0.04 vs. −0.03 ± 0.05, p = 0.642). Significantly better distance-corrected intermediate VA was found in the partial-DOFi group (0.29 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). Similarly, postoperative monocular distance-corrected near VA was better in the partial-DOFi group (0.51 ± 0.10 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). In the defocus curve, significantly better distance-corrected VAs compared to monofocal were found for all defocus levels from −1.50 to −4.00 D. Minor reports of starbursts were found in both IOL groups. With the Catquest questionnaire, some significant differences were found between groups including reduced difficulty reading newspapers (p < 0.001), improved visibility of prices while shopping (p < 0.001) and enhanced performance of hobbies (p = 0.030) and needlework (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The partial-DOFi IOL evaluated demonstrates superior intermediate and near visual performance compared to a monofocal IOL, while maintaining equivalent distance vision and visual quality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop