jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Difficult Situations and Modern Surgical Techniques in Ventral Hernia Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "General Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 February 2024) | Viewed by 2890

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT-GHU AP-HP, Nord-Université de Paris, 92700 Colombes, France
Interests: bariatric surgery; botulinum toxin; complex ventral hernia repair; gastroparesis; incisional hernia; obesity; parastomal hernia; ventral hernia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nowadays, the surgical treatment of ventral hernia represents a continuous challenge. This is mainly due to hernia location (lateral, parastomal), complexity (in relation to the width or to a loss of domain), or to a patient’s particular condition (especially obesity). Despite international guidelines and worldwide consensus updates, evidence gaps persist at all points. The aim of this Special Issue is to provide a comprehensive overview of the advances in the treatment of ventral hernia, with a particular interest in the mangement of patients with obesity, complex localizations, and the use of innovative techniques of preoptimization (botulinum toxin, preoperative pneumoperitoneum) as well as surgical repair (innovative mesh, robotic). Therefore, researchers in the field of abdominal wall repair are encouraged to submit their findings as original articles, surgical techniques, or reviews to this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. David Moszkowicz
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • botulinum toxin
  • obesity
  • robotic surgery
  • ventral hernia
  • parastomal hernia

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

10 pages, 511 KiB  
Article
Primary Ventral Hernia Repair and the Risk of Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Intra Versus Extraperitoneal Mesh
by Marine Goullieux, Fawaz Abo-Alhassan, Remi Vieira-Da-Silva, Papet Lauranne, Adeline Guiraud and Pablo Ortega-Deballon
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5341; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165341 - 16 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1398
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the likelihood of bowel obstruction according to the placement of the mesh (either intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal) in ventral hernia repairs. Materials and methods: Patients were divided into two groups, an intraperitoneal (IP) group (mesh [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the likelihood of bowel obstruction according to the placement of the mesh (either intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal) in ventral hernia repairs. Materials and methods: Patients were divided into two groups, an intraperitoneal (IP) group (mesh placed by laparoscopy or with an open approach) and an extraperitoneal (EP) group, all operated on in the Digestive Surgery Department at the Dijon University Hospital. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an episode of bowel obstruction requiring hospitalization and confirmed by abdominal CT scan. Results: Between March 2008 and July 2021, 318 patients were included, with 99 patients in the EP group (71 meshes placed preperitoneally and 28 placed retromuscularly) and 219 patients in the IP group (175 patients operated on laparoscopically versus 44 patients by direct approach). Three patients presented an episode of acute intestinal obstruction, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.245), although all bowel obstructions occurred in the IP group and with the laparoscopic approach (1.7% of patients operated on by laparoscopy). The occlusive events occurred at 1 month, 2 years, and 3 years. There was no difference in terms of recurrence or postoperative chronic pain. There were more seroma and mesh infections in the EP group (p < 0.05). Two patients operated on by laparoscopy had undetected bowel injuries, prompting emergent surgery for peritonitis. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was found in terms of bowel obstruction between the intraperitoneal and the extraperitoneal position, but all cases of obstruction happened in the intraperitoneal mesh group. Visceral lesions remain a major complication of the laparoscopic approach that should not be neglected. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 1237 KiB  
Systematic Review
Surgical Treatment of Neuropathic Chronic Postherniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Esmee Kwee, Mirte Langeveld, Liron S. Duraku, Caroline A. Hundepool and Michiel Zuidam
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 2812; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102812 - 10 May 2024
Viewed by 1082
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neuropathic chronic postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) is a serious adverse outcome following inguinal hernia repair surgery. The optimal surgical treatment for neuropathic CPIP remains controversial in the current literature. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various surgical techniques [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neuropathic chronic postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) is a serious adverse outcome following inguinal hernia repair surgery. The optimal surgical treatment for neuropathic CPIP remains controversial in the current literature. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various surgical techniques utilized to manage neuropathic CPIP. Methods: The electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar were searched. Inclusion criteria were defined to select studies reporting on the efficacy of surgical interventions in patients with neuropathic CPIP. The primary outcome was postoperative pain relief, as determined by postoperative numerical or nonnumerical pain scores. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Three surgical techniques were identified: selective neurectomy, triple neurectomy, and targeted muscle reinnervation. Proportions of good postoperative results of the surgical techniques ranged between 46 and 88 percent. Overall, the surgical treatment of neuropathic CPIP achieved a good postoperative result in 68 percent (95% CI, 49 to 82%) of neuropathic CPIP patients (n = 244), with targeted muscle reinnervation yielding the highest proportion of good postoperative results. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of neuropathic CPIP is generally considered safe and has demonstrated effective pain relief across various surgical techniques. Targeted muscle reinnervation exhibits considerable potential for surpassing current success rates in inguinal hernia repair surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop