Landscape Science and Natural Resource Management

A special issue of Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2024 | Viewed by 2711

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Departamento Arqueologia, Conservação e Restauro e Património, Polytechnic Institute of Tomar, 2300-313 Tomar, Portugal
Interests: biodiversity and conservation; biomonitoring; biodiversity; field sampling; ecological monitoring; environmental impact assessment; wildlife conservation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Geoinformation Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing of Environment, AGH University of Science and Technology in Kraków, Av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Interests: environment; water quality; environmental impact assessment ecology; environmental analysis; wastewater treatment; environmental pollution; water and wastewater treatment water treatment water analysis environmental monitoring rivers wastewater engineering biol

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Human activity over the last 50 years has transformed the Earth's landscapes to such an extent that there is a scientific consensus, despite some objections, that we have entered a new geological period or division known as the Anthropocene (Fagan, 2019; Fu et al., 2022; Malhi, 2017; McCarthy et al., 2023). Research related to human interaction with nature and landscapes, described as landscape research, landscape science, geo-ecology, or landscape ecology, traditionally a scientific branch of geography, gained considerable interest amongst researchers (Gordon et al., 2001; Slaymaker et al., 2021; Vasiliev & Greenwood, 2022).

Landscapes as multifunctional, highly complex systems provide a platform for disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research (Jauker & Diekötter, 2022), aiming to combine sustainability and high-quality productivity, under the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations and the provisions of the Landscape Convention of the European Council (United Nations, 2022). The use of landscape science can significantly enhance natural resource management strategies by providing a comprehensive understanding of the ecological processes and spatial dynamics within an ecosystem (Suzette Lorilla et al., 2023). Additionally, landscape science can aid in the assessment of ecosystem services (Vigna et al., 2024), such as water purification (Boix-Fayos et al., 2020; Glushkova et al., 2020), carbon sequestration (Gaglio et al., 2019), and biodiversity conservation (Perino et al., 2022). By integrating landscape science into natural resource management strategies, decision-makers can make informed choices that promote sustainable land use and preserve biodiversity (Nagendra et al., 2013).

Halting landscape degradation, developing cultural landscapes, and maintaining semi-natural landscapes can guarantee clean water and air, fertile and healthy soils for food and other ecosystem services, and a green and biodiverse environment, all essential attributes of landscapes for the survival and well-being of humans in coexistence with nature. Landscape research must generate knowledge, innovations, and responsible decision rules for achieving these aims (Schirpke et al., 2021). Big data gathering and scenario modelling are important for knowledge generation in a globalised world. International long-term experiments, observatories, and monitoring systems deliver data for comprehensive ecosystem models and decision support systems (Caro et al., 2020; Kopacz et al., 2021). Technical innovations must be embedded in cultural solutions for the evolvement of landscapes, and this understanding can help identify key areas and determine optimal land use practices and mechanisms, thus mitigating the impacts of habitat fragmentation and ecosystem degradation (Nagendra et al., 2013; Nolè et al., 2021; Terrado et al., 2016). Concepts such as regenerative landscape development and sustainable land use management are vital for thriving ecosystems and resolving environmental conflicts, particularly those where resources are shared by multiple countries (Brown et al., 2022; Kallio & LaFleur, 2023).

Overall, landscape science plays a crucial role in understanding and managing the complex interactions between natural resources and human activities. By combining knowledge from various disciplines, such as ecology, geology, climate, humanities, and socio-economic studies, landscape science provides a holistic approach to natural resource management (Fouad et al., 2022). This holistic approach considers not only the ecological aspects of an ecosystem but also the integration of science, practice, culture, and spirituality through regenerative development, which could lead to a future where landscapes not only sustain but thrive.

This Special Issue aims to support the better understanding, monitoring, and managing of landscapes, using multiple approaches, with technological, artistic, cultural, social, economic, and technical considerations of innovations, from rural agricultural land and water management to urban landscapes, and the implications climate change will have on landscape sustainability. We invite authors to present novel tools for ecosystem modelling and forecasting of landscape processes and creating knowledge, rules, and approaches for handling the multifunctionality of landscapes. This Special Issue aims to be a knowledge base and a communication tool for informed decisions regarding the development of landscapes, enlarging our horizon and field of action by building bridges between scientific communities, scientific disciplines, researchers, and citizens. Both interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches will be considered, guaranteeing the pertinent contribution to a comprehensive understanding of the importance of landscape science.

References:

Boix-Fayos, C., Boerboom, L. G. J., Janssen, R., Martínez-Mena, M., Almagro, M., Pérez-Cutillas, P., Eekhout, J. P. C., Castillo, V., & de Vente, J. (2020). Mountain ecosystem services affected by land use changes and hydrological control works in Mediterranean catchments. Ecosystem Services, 44(October 2019), 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101136

Brown, K., Schirmer, J., & Upton, P. (2022). Can regenerative agriculture support successful adaptation to climate change and improved landscape health through building farmer self-efficacy and wellbeing? Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100170

Caro, C., Marques, J. C., Cunha, P. P., & Teixeira, Z. (2020). Ecosystem services as a resilience descriptor in habitat risk assessment using the InVEST model. Ecological Indicators, 115(April), 106426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106426

Fagan, M. (2019). On the dangers of an Anthropocene epoch: Geological time, political time and post-human politics. Political Geography, 70, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.008

Fouad, S. S., Heggy, E., Abotalib, A. Z., Ramah, M., Jomaa, S., & Weilacher, U. (2022). Landscape-based regeneration of the Nile Delta’s waterways in support of water conservation and environmental protection. In Ecological Indicators (Vol. 145). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109660

Fu, B., Meadows, M. E., & Zhao, W. (2022). Geography in the Anthropocene: Transforming our world for sustainable development. In Geography and Sustainability (Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 1–6). Beijing Normal University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.12.004

Gaglio, M., Aschonitis, V., Pieretti, L., Santos, L., Gissi, E., Castaldelli, G., & Fano, E. A. (2019). Modelling past, present and future Ecosystem Services supply in a protected floodplain under land use and climate changes. Ecological Modelling, 403, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.04.019

Glushkova, M., Zhiyanski, M., Nedkov, S., Yaneva, R., & Stoeva, L. (2020). Ecosystem services from mountain forest ecosystems: conceptual framework, approach and challenges. Silva Balcanica, 21(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.3897/silvabalcanica.21.e54628

Gordon, J. E., Brazier, V., Thompson, D. B., & Horsfield, D. (2001). Geo-ecology and the conservation management of sensitive upland landscapes in Scotland. In Catena (Vol. 42). www.elsevier.comrlocatercatena

Jauker, F., & Diekötter, T. (2022). Sown wildflower areas for biodiversity conservation and multifunctional agricultural landscapes. Basic and Applied Ecology, 63, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2022.05.003

Kallio, G., & LaFleur, W. (2023). Ways of (un)knowing landscapes: Tracing more-than-human relations in regenerative agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103059

Kopacz, M. T., Kowalewski, Z., Santos, L., Mazur, R., Lopes, V., Kowalczyk, A., & Bar-Michalczyk, D. (2021). Modelling of long term low water level in the mountain river catchments area. Journal of Water and Land Development, 51, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2021.139033

Malhi, Y. (2017). The Concept of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ

McCarthy, F. M. G., Patterson, T., Head, M. J., Riddick, N. L., Cumming, B. F., Hamilton, P. B., Pisaric, M. F. J., Gushulak, C., Leavitt, P. R., Lafond, K. M., Llew-Williams, B., Marshall, M., Heyde, A., Pilkington, P. M., Moraal, J., Boyce, J. I., Nasser, N. A., Walsh, C., Garvie, M., … McAndrews, J. H. (2023). The varved succession of Crawford Lake, Milton, Ontario, Canada as a candidate Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Anthropocene series. Anthropocene Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196221149281

Nagendra, H., Lucas, R., Honrado, J. P., Jongman, R. H. G., Tarantino, C., Adamo, M., & Mairota, P. (2013). Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecological Indicators, 33, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.014

Nolè, L., Pilogallo, A., Saganeiti, L., Bonifazi, A., Santarsiero, V., Santos, L., & Murgante, B. (2021). Land use change and habitat degradation: A case study from tomar (portugal). Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178 SIST, 1722–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_163

Perino, A., Pereira, H. M., Felipe-Lucia, M., Kim, H. J., Kühl, H. S., Marselle, M. R., Meya, J. N., Meyer, C., Navarro, L. M., van Klink, R., Albert, G., Barratt, C. D., Bruelheide, H., Cao, Y., Chamoin, A., Darbi, M., Dornelas, M., Eisenhauer, N., Essl, F., … Bonn, A. (2022). Biodiversity post-2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation. Conservation Letters, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12848

Santana, C. (2019). Waiting for the Anthropocene. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(4), 1073–1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy022

Schirpke, U., Wang, G., & Padoa-Schioppa, E. (2021). Editorial: Mountain landscapes: Protected areas, ecosystem services, and future challenges. In Ecosystem Services (Vol. 49). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101302

Slaymaker, O., Spencer, T., & Embleton-Hamann, C. (2021). Recasting geomorphology as a landscape science. Geomorphology, 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107723

Suzette Lorilla, R., Kefalas, G., Christou, A. K., Poirazidis, K., & Homer Eliades, N. G. (2023). Enhancing the conservation status and resilience of a narrowly distributed forest: A challenge to effectively support ecosystem services in practice. Journal for Nature Conservation, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126414

Terrado, M., Sabater, S., Chaplin-Kramer, B., Mandle, L., Ziv, G., & Acuña, V. (2016). Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.064

United Nations. (n.d.). SDGs: The 17 Goals. 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Vasiliev, D., & Greenwood, S. (2022). Making green pledges support biodiversity: Nature-based solution design can be informed by landscape ecology principles. Land Use Policy, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106129

Vigna, I., Battisti, L., Ascoli, D., Besana, A., Pezzoli, A., & Comino, E. (2024). Integrating cultural ecosystem services in wildfire risk assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104977

Dr. Luís S. Santos
Dr. Robert Mazur
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diversity is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2100 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecological restoration
  • sustainable agriculture
  • ecology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 13013 KiB  
Article
Assessing Land Use Ecological-Social-Production Functions and Interrelationships from the Perspective of Multifunctional Landscape in a Transitional Zone between Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Loess Plateau
by Yu Ma, Wenfeng Ji, Qingxiang Meng, Yali Zhang, Ling Li, Mengxue Liu and Hejie Wei
Diversity 2024, 16(10), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100618 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 581
Abstract
Investigating the evolution and drivers of multifunctional land use is essential for sustainable land management and regional biological conservation. This research focuses on the Hehuang Valley, where we developed an “ecological-social-production” evaluation system for assessing land use multifunctionality from the perspective of multifunctional [...] Read more.
Investigating the evolution and drivers of multifunctional land use is essential for sustainable land management and regional biological conservation. This research focuses on the Hehuang Valley, where we developed an “ecological-social-production” evaluation system for assessing land use multifunctionality from the perspective of multifunctional landscape. Leveraging Geographic Information System technologies, we conducted a quantitative analysis of spatiotemporal variations in multifunctional land use across the valley in recently twenty years. Correlation coefficients were employed to identify trade-offs and synergies among various land use functions. Additionally, geographical detector and grey relational analysis models were utilized to pinpoint the factors influencing spatiotemporal changes in land use functions during the specified period. The results showed that: (1) During the period, the overall multifunctionality of land use in the Hehuang Valley exhibited an increasing trend. The economic production function of the land showed the highest growth, while the ecological and social functions showed lower growth. (2) In most areas of the Hehuang Valley, there was a positive correlation between social and economic production functions and a negative correlation between social and ecological functions, as well as between economic production and ecological functions. (3) Natural conditions were the main factors of spatial variation of land use comprehensive functions, but human factors, including land use intensity and the rate of farmland conversion to non-agricultural uses, were the primary drivers of temporal changes in multifunctional land use. The findings provide valuable references and scientific support for policymakers in optimizing land use and multifunctional landscape conservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Landscape Science and Natural Resource Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2714 KiB  
Article
Identifying Cross-Regional Ecological Compensation Based on Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand, and Flow for Landscape Management
by Hejie Wei, Jiahui Wu, Yu Ma, Ling Li, Yi Yang and Mengxue Liu
Diversity 2024, 16(9), 561; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090561 - 7 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1622
Abstract
Clarifying the issues related to the supply, demand, and flow of ecosystem services is crucial for regional landscape management. This study employs the equivalence factor method and demand index quantification to analyze the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Zheng-Bian-Luo region [...] Read more.
Clarifying the issues related to the supply, demand, and flow of ecosystem services is crucial for regional landscape management. This study employs the equivalence factor method and demand index quantification to analyze the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Zheng-Bian-Luo region in 2000 and 2020. We used hotspot analysis tools and the minimum cumulative resistance model to establish the ecological corridors, identifying the spatial flow paths of ecosystem services in our site. By calculating the flow volume of the key corridor value through the breakpoint formula and field strength theory and combining this with the ratio of the regulating service value, we computed the ecological compensation amount, thereby realizing the value of the ecosystem service. The results indicate that the area of balance between ecosystem service supply and demand gradually decreased and the deficit area in the Zheng-Bian-Luo region increased 43.62% from 2000 to 2020 along with rapid urbanization. The total value flow of ecosystem services by the important ecological corridors in 2000 and 2020 was USD 242.40 million and USD 365.92 million, respectively. In 2020, it was predicted that Luanchuan County would receive ecological compensation totals of USD 237.76 million from each ecological demand area, and mainly from Jinshui District. Our findings support enhancing the quality of the ecological environment and optimizing the landscape management of the Yellow River’s Henan section. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Landscape Science and Natural Resource Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop