Advances in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 3537

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Interests: cardiovascular medicine; interventional cardiology; intravascular imaging; biomarkers in cardiovascular medicine

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Although our understanding of the biology of atherosclerosis is improving, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. State-of-the art diagnosis of CAD is crucial for the optimized prediction of adverse events, the management of affected individuals, and the prevention of cardiovascular death.   

Recent progress in this field has allowed for the precise and early identification of coronary artery segments prone to rupture or erode, as well as a less invasive identification of stenoses causing myocardial ischemia (such as angiography-based coronary flow indices). This Special Issue of Diagnostics will focus on challenges, limitations, and future perspectives related to the morphometric and functional assessment of coronary stenosis severity, using both non-invasive and invasive modalities, as well as novel algorithms employing computational fluid dynamics and artificial intelligence.

Dr. Mariusz Tomaniak
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • intracoronary imaging
  • functional assessment of coronary stenosis
  • FFR/FFR-CT
  • angiography-based fractional flow reserve
  • plaque rupture
  • plaque erosion
  • optical coherence tomography
  • intravascular ultrasound
  • near-infrared spectroscopy
  • CCTA

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 875 KiB  
Article
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Disease: A Single-Center Study
by Ștefan Dan Cezar Moț, Adela Mihaela Șerban, Alexandru Achim, Alexandra Dădârlat-Pop, Raluca Tomoaia and Dana Pop
Diagnostics 2023, 13(7), 1333; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13071333 - 3 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1341
Abstract
Background: Hemodynamically significant unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease is a high-risk clinical condition because of the large area of myocardium at risk, and it requires prompt revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an appropriate alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting [...] Read more.
Background: Hemodynamically significant unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease is a high-risk clinical condition because of the large area of myocardium at risk, and it requires prompt revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an appropriate alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of unprotected LM disease in patients with low-to-intermediate anatomic complexity or when the patient refuses CABG after adequate counseling by the heart team. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 201 patients receiving left main (LM) provisional one-stent or two-stent procedures, and we assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing unprotected LM PCI. Results: The mean age was 66.5 ± 9.9 years, and 72% were male. The majority of the subjects presented several cardiovascular risk factors, among which arterial hypertension (179 patients, 89.5%) and dyslipidemia (173 patients, 86.5%) were the most frequent. Out of all patients, 162 (81.8%) underwent revascularization by using the one-stent technique, while the two-stent technique was used in 36 patients (18.2%). The median value of fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the side branch was 0.9 [0.85–0.95], and 135 patients (67.1%) showed a value of FFR > 0.8. One hundred nine patients (54.2%) had a stent enhancement side branch length (SESBL) > 2, with median values of 2.5 mm2 [2.1–3]. Regarding angiographic parameters, the LM area as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the grade of stenosis as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were similar between groups. However, patients who required revascularization by using the two-stent technique presented more frequently with intermediate rather than low SYNTAX scores (69.4% vs. 28.4%, p < 0.0001). Also, the same group required kissing balloon inflation (KBI) more frequently (69.4% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding the success of revascularization between the use of the one-stent or two-stent technique. FFR was able to predict a SESBL > 2 mm. The cut-off value for FFR to afford the highest degree of sensitivity (74.5%) and specificity (47%) for a SESBL > 2 was >0.86, indicating a moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.525–0.690, p = 0.036). Conclusions: Unprotected left main PCI is a safe and effective revascularization option amongst a complex and morbid population. There were no differences regarding the success of revascularization between the use of the one-stent or two-stent technique, and there was no significant impact of KBI on side branch FFR measurements but lower side branch FFR values were correlated with angiographic side branch compromise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 1752 KiB  
Review
Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve by Echocardiography: Beyond Atherosclerotic Disease
by Giovanni Civieri, Roberta Montisci, Peter L. M. Kerkhof, Sabino Iliceto and Francesco Tona
Diagnostics 2023, 13(2), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020193 - 5 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1870
Abstract
Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is defined as the ratio between coronary flow velocity during maximal hyperemia and coronary flow at rest. Gold-standard techniques to measure CFVR are either invasive or require radiation and are therefore inappropriate for large-scale adoption. More than 30 [...] Read more.
Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is defined as the ratio between coronary flow velocity during maximal hyperemia and coronary flow at rest. Gold-standard techniques to measure CFVR are either invasive or require radiation and are therefore inappropriate for large-scale adoption. More than 30 years ago, echocardiography was demonstrated to be a reliable tool to assess CFVR, and its field of application rapidly expanded. Although initially validated to assess the hemodynamic relevance of a coronary stenosis, CFVR by echocardiography was later used to investigate coronary microcirculation. Microvascular dysfunction was detected in many different conditions, ranging from organ transplantation to inflammatory disorders and from metabolic diseases to cardiomyopathies. Moreover, it has been proven that CFVR by echocardiography not only detects coronary microvascular involvement but is also an effective prognostic factor that allows a precise risk stratification of the patients. In this review, we will summarize the many applications of CFVR by echocardiography, focusing on the coronary involvement of systemic diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop