Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2025) | Viewed by 3084

Special Issue Editor

Endometriosis and Neuroenterology Research Institute, 53 Loveton Circle, Sparks Glencoe, MD 21152, USA
Interests: acid reflux; endoscopy; neuroenterology; endometriosis; gastroenterology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Gastrointestinal motility disorders, particularly those that involve the stomach and the small bowel, are responsible for some of the most pervasive and difficult-to-control diseases. If we look at reflux disease, it is largely caused by the malfunction of gastric motility. Similar comments can be made for dyspepsia and gastroparesis, which have recently been determined to be the same disease at different ends of the spectrum. Other diseases have characteristic signatures of disordered small bowel or gastric motility, which can be used to diagnose them. Examples of this include adenomyosis and endometriosis. The same motility issue is responsible for problems with fertility. Gastroparesis can be subdivided into three basic groups, which include normal corpus contraction, hypocorpus contraction, and hypernormal or functional outlet obstruction of the pylorus. With the ability to use current tools to place these diseases in separate subtypes comes the ability to treat and cure them. Gastroparesis has been thought to be incurable; however, if we look at the hypernormal or the normal type associated with reflux disease, we know that they account for approximately 50% of gastroparesis and can be completely cured. The problem is proper identification. We have tools, including Electrogastrography and electroviscerography, that are capable of not only diagnosing abnormal motility but subtyping it. Additionally, the hyponormal subtype can be caused by things like hyper- or hypothyroidism, diabetes, and collagen vascular disease. Once again, by using EGG or EVG we can make that diagnosis and therefore cure the underlying problem by curing the causative disease. Studying gastric motility can also help us avoid complications caused by different surgical procedures, such as bariatric surgery. Most do not realize that there is a 40% complication rate of refractory reflux and up to a 6% rate of leakage from the staple line, all caused by an underlying, unrecognized gastric motility disorder. EGG can detect this; the patient can then be treated preventatively and avoid this complication. My goal is to make those in clinical medicine and surgery aware of the potential of these tools in order to improve the lives of the hundreds of millions of people who suffer from these diseases.

The following Special Issue is designed to specifically focus on research being conducted in the field, specific to gastric and gastrointestinal, motility, and associated disorders. It is designed to bring to the forefront the newest technology, as well as related diagnostics and therapy, as it pertains specifically to the stomach and gastrointestinal system. The specific aims of this Special Issue are to highlight the scope of diagnosis and technology used to diagnose disorders involving the stomach and gastrointestinal system including the large and small bowel. In addition, the use of motility to aid not only in the diagnosis but also the personalization of medicine and therapy as well as basic bench research on the physiological basis for motility and its disorders are encouraged. Our overall goal is to highlight what usually remains unseen and unrecognized that, nevertheless, plays a significant role in human disease.

Included topics: gastroparesis, dyspepsia, electrogastrography, gastric mapping, small and large bowel motility, and associated disorders that affect gastrointestinal motility such as endometriosis and adenomyosis, and reflux disease, to name a few. Esophageal, motility, and pH are specifically not part of the scope of the Special Issue.

Dr. Mark Noar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gastrointestinal motility disorders
  • diagnosis
  • dyspepsia
  • gastroparesis
  • chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction
  • irritable bowel syndrome
  • chronic constipation
  • endoscopy
  • endometriosis
  • biliary disease

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Prevalence of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Gastric Dysrhythmias in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Indian Populations: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis from Electrogastrography Data
by Sanjay Bandyopadhyay and Ajit Kolatkar
Diagnostics 2025, 15(7), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070895 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 431
Abstract
Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders, such as gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (FD), contribute significantly to morbidity, especially in populations at risk for type 2 diabetes. However, the prevalence and clinical manifestations of these disorders in India, and associated gastric dysrhythmias, are not [...] Read more.
Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders, such as gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (FD), contribute significantly to morbidity, especially in populations at risk for type 2 diabetes. However, the prevalence and clinical manifestations of these disorders in India, and associated gastric dysrhythmias, are not well studied within this population. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed 3689 patients who underwent electrogastrography with water load satiety test (EGGWLST) testing across multiple motility clinics in India. The prevalence of gastroparesis and FD-like symptoms, symptom severity, and their association with diabetes and other comorbidities were evaluated. Symptom severity was assessed using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). EGGWLST findings were documented, including the gastric myoelectric activity threshold (GMAT) scores. Results: The study population had a mean age of 43.18 years. GCSI scores indicated that patients had symptoms that were mild (55%), moderate (33%), and severe (8%). Compared with the non-diabetic population, diabetic subjects had significantly higher rates of early satiety (56% vs. 45%, p < 0.0001), bloating (73% vs. 67%, p = 0.005), and reflux (28% vs. 24%, p = 0.029). WLST data analysis revealed that significantly more diabetic subjects ingested <350 mL (16% vs. 12%, p = 0.000016). EGG analysis revealed gastric dysthymias in one-third (65%) of patients. Significantly more diabetic subjects (22% vs. 18% p = 0.015) had a GMAT score >0.59. Conclusions: Upper GI motility disorders are prevalent in India, particularly among diabetic patients. EGG is a valuable tool for characterizing these disorders, and may help in personalizing therapeutic approaches. Further research is required to optimize treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2091 KiB  
Article
Local Myoelectric Sensing During Human Colonic Tissue Perfusion
by Matan Ben-David, Raj Makwana, Tal Yered, Gareth J. Sanger, Charles H. Knowles, Nir Wasserberg and Erez Shor
Diagnostics 2024, 14(24), 2870; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242870 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 646
Abstract
Objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most devastating complications after colorectal surgery. The verification of the adequate perfusion of the anastomosis is essential to ensuring anastomosis integrity following colonic resections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of measuring the electrical [...] Read more.
Objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most devastating complications after colorectal surgery. The verification of the adequate perfusion of the anastomosis is essential to ensuring anastomosis integrity following colonic resections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of measuring the electrical activity of the colonic muscularis externa at an anastomosis site for perfusion analysis following colorectal surgery. Methods: Strips of human isolated colon were maintained in a horizontal tissue bath to record spontaneous contractions and myoelectric activity and spike potentials (using a bipolar electrode array for the wireless transmission of myoelectric data—the xBar system) from the circular muscle. Intraoperative myoelectric signal assessment was performed by placing the electrode array on the colon prior to and following mesenteric artery ligation, just prior to colonic resection. Results: In human isolated colon, the amplitude, duration, and frequency of contractions were inhibited during hypoxia by >80% for each measurement, compared to control values and time-matched oxygenated muscle. Intraoperative (N = 5; mean age, 64.8 years; range, 54–74 years; 60% females) myoelectric signal assessment revealed a decline in spike rate following arterial ligation, with a mean reduction of 112.64 to 51.13 spikes/min (p < 0.0008). No adverse events were observed during the study, and the device did not substantially alter the surgical procedure. Conclusions: The electrical and contraction force of the human colon was reduced by ischemia, both in vitro and in vivo. These preliminary findings also suggest the potential of the xBar system to measure such changes during intraoperative and possibly postoperative periods to predict the risk of anastomotic viability as a surrogate of evolving dehiscence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 857 KiB  
Article
Sedation and Endoscopy-Assisted High-Resolution Manometry (SEA-HRM) in Patients Who Previously Failed Standard Esophageal Manometry
by Daniel L. Cohen, Eyal Avivi, Sergei Vosko, Vered Richter, Haim Shirin and Anton Bermont
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2232; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192232 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1437
Abstract
Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess [...] Read more.
Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess patient perspectives towards it. Methods: Adult patients who previously failed HRM were prospectively enrolled. Under propofol sedation, an upper endoscopy was performed during which the HRM catheter was advanced under endoscopic visualization. If the catheter did not reach the stomach on its own, the endoscope itself or a snare was used to help it traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Results: Thirty patients participated (mean age 67.8, 70% female). The technical success of SEA-HRM was 100%. Twenty-two (73.3%) were diagnosed with a motility disorder including thirteen (43.3%) with achalasia. Eighteen (60%) had previously failed HRM due to discomfort/intolerance, while twelve (40%) failed due to catheter coiling in the esophagus. Subjects in the coiling group were more likely to need endoscopic assistance to traverse the EGJ (91.7% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001) and have a motility disorder (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.010), including achalasia (75.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), compared to the discomfort/intolerance group. All patients preferred SEA-HRM and rated it higher than standard HRM (9.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1, p = <0.001, on a scale of 1–10). Conclusions: SEA-HRM is a highly successful and well-tolerated option in patients who previously failed standard HRM. This should be the recommended approach in cases of failed HRM rather than secondary tests of esophageal motility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop