Data in Behavioral and Experimental Research: Datasets and Applications

A special issue of Data (ISSN 2306-5729).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2026 | Viewed by 4142

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Interests: information economics; experimental economics; behavioral economics; industrial economics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Decision Sciences and Managerial Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
Interests: behavioral economics; experimental economics; microeconomics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Behavioral experiments generate complex datasets that capture nuanced dimensions of human cognition, decision-making, and social interactions. As these experiments continue to grow in sophistication and scale, so does the value of the data that they produce. Despite their scientific importance, many behavioral datasets remain isolated, lack standardized documentation, or pose methodological challenges for analysis.

This Special Issue invites submissions that address the full lifecycle of behavioral experimental data, ranging from experimental design to data sharing and advanced analysis. We welcome papers that introduce, describe, or analyze datasets generated through laboratory experiments, field studies, or online behavioral research. This Special Issue of Data will bridge existing gaps by fostering the open sharing of behavioral datasets and promoting innovative methodologies for their analysis.

Topics include but are not limited to the following:

  • Dataset Descriptors: Articles that document experimental datasets, including information on experimental design, data collection procedures, and potential use cases. We are particularly interested in articles that describe datasets derived from diverse experimental paradigms, such as decision-making tasks, economic games, neuroeconomic studies, or field experiments. Such contributions enhance the reusability and citability of valuable behavioral data across the research community.
  • Analytical Studies: We also call for methodological advances in processing and interpreting behavioral data. We encourage articles that demonstrate how such data can be used to generate insights, test theories, or explore new methodological approaches. These studies may include cross-study analyses, novel empirical strategies, or applications of advanced statistical and computational tools. Specifically, submissions may explore innovative statistical models for capturing heterogeneous behavioral patterns, machine learning techniques, or integrative approaches that combine choice data with multimodal signals, such as eye-tracking, physiological measurements, or neuroimaging data. We also welcome cross-disciplinary applications that demonstrate how behavioral datasets can inform real-world challenges, for instance, case studies on policy design grounded in experimental evidence, analyses of public health interventions leveraging behavioral insights, or investigations into cultural and demographic variations in decision-making.

In addition, we welcome submissions addressing topics such as the following:

  • Replication studies using shared behavioral data;
  • Methods for organizing and standardizing behavioral datasets;
  • Meta-analyses and cross-experimental comparisons;
  • Interdisciplinary applications of behavioral data (e.g., in health, education, development, or finance);
  • Innovations in data sharing, archiving, and citation practices;
  • Ethical and methodological considerations in data openness.

We hope that this Special Issue will serve as a platform to promote open science, data transparency, and methodological rigor in the behavioral sciences. We welcome submissions from experimental economists, behavioral scientists, psychologists, data scientists, and all related disciplines.

Prof. Dr. Jie Zheng
Dr. Jaimie W Lien
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Data is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • behavioral experiments
  • experimental economics
  • behavioral data
  • experimental data
  • data sharing
  • dataset descriptors
  • replication
  • meta-analysis
  • open science
  • experimental design
  • decision-making

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

16 pages, 594 KB  
Article
A Data-Driven Analysis of Cognitive Learning and Illusion Effects in University Mathematics
by Rodolfo Bojorque, Fernando Moscoso, Miguel Arcos-Argudo and Fernando Pesántez
Data 2025, 10(11), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10110192 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 408
Abstract
The increasing adoption of video-based instruction and digital assessment in higher education has reshaped how students interact with learning materials. However, it also introduces cognitive and behavioral biases that challenge the accuracy of self-perceived learning. This study aims to bridge the gap between [...] Read more.
The increasing adoption of video-based instruction and digital assessment in higher education has reshaped how students interact with learning materials. However, it also introduces cognitive and behavioral biases that challenge the accuracy of self-perceived learning. This study aims to bridge the gap between perceived and actual learning by investigating how illusion learning—an overestimation of understanding driven by the fluency of instructional media and autonomous study behaviors—affects cognitive performance in university mathematics. Specifically, it examines how students’ performance evolves across Bloom’s cognitive domains (Understanding, Application, and Analysis) from midterm to final assessments. This paper presents a data-driven investigation that combines the theoretical framework of illusion learning, the tendency to overestimate understanding based on the fluency of instructional media, with empirical evidence drawn from a structured and anonymized dataset of 294 undergraduate students enrolled in a Linear Algebra course. The dataset records midterm and final exam scores across three cognitive domains (Understanding, Application, and Analysis) aligned with Bloom’s taxonomy. Through paired-sample testing, descriptive analytics, and visual inspection, the study identifies significant improvement in analytical reasoning, moderate progress in application, and persistent overconfidence in self-assessment. These results suggest that while students develop higher-order problem-solving skills, a cognitive gap remains between perceived and actual mastery. Beyond contributing to the theoretical understanding of metacognitive illusion, this paper provides a reproducible dataset and analysis framework that can inform future work in learning analytics, educational psychology, and behavioral modeling in higher education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 2744 KB  
Article
Synergistic Evolution or Competitive Disruption? Analysing the Dynamic Interaction Between Digital and Real Economies in Henan, China, Based on Panel Data
by Yaping Zhu, Qingwei Xu, Chutong Hao, Shuaishuai Geng and Bingjun Li
Data 2025, 10(8), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10080126 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1139
Abstract
In the digital transformation era, understanding the relationship between digital and real economies is vital for regional development. This study analyses the interaction between these two economies in Henan Province using panel data from 18 cities (2011–2023). It incorporates policy support intensity through [...] Read more.
In the digital transformation era, understanding the relationship between digital and real economies is vital for regional development. This study analyses the interaction between these two economies in Henan Province using panel data from 18 cities (2011–2023). It incorporates policy support intensity through fuzzy set theory, applies an integrated weighting method to measure development levels, and uses regression models to assess the digital economy’s impact on the real economy. The coupling coordination degree model, kernel density estimation, and Gini coefficient reveal the coordination status and spatial distribution, while the ecological Lotka–Volterra model identifies the symbiotic patterns. The key findings are as follows: (1) The digital economy does not directly determine the state of the real economy. For example, cities such as Zhoukou and Zhumadian have low digital economy levels but high real economy levels. However, the development of the digital economy promotes the real economy without signs of diminishing returns. (2) The two economies are generally coordinated but differ spatially, with greater coordination in the Central Plains urban agglomeration. (3) The digital and real economies exhibit both collaboration and competition, with reciprocal mutualism as the dominant mode of integration. These insights provide guidance for policymakers and offer a new perspective on the integration of both economies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2284 KB  
Article
Rethinking Inequality: The Complex Dynamics Beyond the Kuznets Curve
by Sarthak Pattnaik, Maryan Rizinski and Eugene Pinsky
Data 2025, 10(6), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10060088 - 14 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1790
Abstract
Income inequality has emerged as a defining challenge of our time, particularly in advanced economies, where the gap between rich and poor has reached unprecedented levels. This study analyzes income inequality trends from 2000 to 2023 across developed countries (the United States, the [...] Read more.
Income inequality has emerged as a defining challenge of our time, particularly in advanced economies, where the gap between rich and poor has reached unprecedented levels. This study analyzes income inequality trends from 2000 to 2023 across developed countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France) and developing nations using World Bank Gini coefficient data. We employ comprehensive visualization techniques, Pareto distribution analysis, and ARIMA time-series forecasting models to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kuznets curve as a predictor of income inequality. Our analysis reveals significant deviations from the traditional inverse U-shaped Kuznets curve across all examined countries, with persistent volatility rather than the predicted decline in inequality. Forecasts using ARIMA and neural networks indicate continued fluctuations in inequality through 2030, with the U.S. and Germany showing upward trends while France and the UK demonstrate relative stability. These findings challenge the conventional Kuznets hypothesis and demonstrate that contemporary inequality patterns are influenced by factors beyond economic development, including technological change, globalization, and policy choices. This research contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence that the Kuznets curve has limited predictive power in modern economies, informing policymakers about the need for targeted interventions to address persistent inequality rather than relying on economic growth alone. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 446 KB  
Data Descriptor
Open Dataset on Neurocognitive Complaints and Physical Symptoms in Long COVID: A Six-Month Post-Infection Cohort
by Somayeh Pour Mohammadi, Francisco Mercado Romero, Moein Noroozi Fashkhami and Irene Peláez
Data 2025, 10(12), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10120198 - 1 Dec 2025
Viewed by 168
Abstract
Long COVID is frequently accompanied by enduring neurocognitive and physical symptoms that substantially affect quality of life. Cognitive complaints—including difficulties in memory, attention, and executive functioning—often co-occur with physical manifestations such as fatigue, dyspnea, and headache. Despite growing research, openly available datasets integrating [...] Read more.
Long COVID is frequently accompanied by enduring neurocognitive and physical symptoms that substantially affect quality of life. Cognitive complaints—including difficulties in memory, attention, and executive functioning—often co-occur with physical manifestations such as fatigue, dyspnea, and headache. Despite growing research, openly available datasets integrating demographic, cognitive, and physical symptom profiles assessed during chronic phases of Long COVID remain scarce. Here, we present two complementary self-report datasets collected ≥6 months after the most recent COVID-19 infection. The first dataset (“Neuro–Long COVID-212”) includes demographic information, binary neurocognitive symptom indicators, and a 14-item Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale assessing memory and attention complaints. The second dataset (“Neuro–Long COVID–210”) provides a broad range of physical symptoms—operationally defined as somatic and neurological complaints (e.g., fatigue, pain, sleep disturbance, anosmia/ageusia)—recorded as binary indicators (present/absent). Data were collected online via the Porsline platform using individualized links, with remote researcher support to ensure accuracy. Quality assurance procedures included duplicate-response removal, consistency checks, and transparent handling of missing values. The datasets are released in Excel (.xlsx) format, fully de-identified and accompanied by a detailed data dictionary to facilitate reuse. These datasets enable reproducibility, secondary analyses, and meta-analyses on cognitive and physical outcomes in Long COVID, and may inform future cross-disciplinary rehabilitation research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop