Multisensory Comfort and Human-Centered Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Health and Well-Being

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 3033

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization (DEIM), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
Interests: daylighting design and visual comfort; sustainable and human-centered architecture; inclusive built environments; innovative construction processes and technologies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Interests: indoor environmental quality; visual and non-visual effects of light; human factors in building design; indoor environment and neurodiversity; design for health

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, TEBE Research Group, 10129 Turin, Italy
Interests: daylighting; electric lighting; visual comfort; indoor environmental quality; non-visual effects of light; innovative façade; building simulation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The built environment plays a central role in occupational health and well-being, shaping how people perceive, inhabit, and interact with spaces. Beyond structural safety, environments influence comfort, cognition, and social interaction through sensory and ergonomic factors. Ergonomics provides the methodological foundation for aligning human abilities and task demands, while comfort emerges from the multisensory integration of light, sound, temperature, and spatial organization, supported by building technologies and innovative design methods. These dimensions affect not only work-related performance but also overall health, resilience, and inclusivity in daily life.

Visual comfort and daylighting are particularly critical within this context. Adequate daylight improves task visibility and reduces glare, while also providing non-visual benefits by regulating circadian rhythms, enhancing alertness, and sustaining mood. Such effects, documented in occupational health and environmental psychology, not only directly influence cognitive load, fatigue, and productivity but also extend to broader well-being by shaping sleep quality, mental health, social interaction, and the positive perception of inhabited spaces. In this sense, daylighting affects both occupational performance and quality of life, intertwining physical health, psychological balance, and social participation.

Acoustic balance, thermal regulation, indoor air quality, and the smellscape likewise contribute to multisensory coherence, reducing stress and supporting health and performance. For neurodivergent individuals and those with sensory sensitivities, the stakes are even higher: the environment can either amplify stressors or act as a protective factor. Yet research on design requirements for sensory-sensitive users remains scarce. Adaptive and human-centered strategies, combined with inclusive “design for all” approaches, embed accessibility, equity, and dignity into everyday contexts.

Considering multisensory comfort and perception as integral to human factors, this Special Issue seeks to advance our understanding of how architecture, ergonomics, psychology, and engineering converge to shape health, well-being, and inclusion. Alongside established methods, it also welcomes contributions exploring emerging approaches—such as visual attention scans, VAS-based simulation, and AI-driven models including large language models (LLMs)—to complement traditional evaluations and better assess perceptual, cognitive, and affective qualities of the built environment.

Dr. Federica Giuliani
Dr. Federica Caffaro
Dr. Luca Zaniboni
Dr. Valerio Roberto Maria Lo Verso
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • occupational health
  • well-being
  • ergonomics
  • daylighting and visual comfort
  • non-visual effects of light
  • multisensory comfort
  • human-centered design
  • design for All
  • neurodiversity
  • perception and sensory experience
  • innovative construction technologies applied
  • AI and simulation tools for design and evaluation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

34 pages, 10976 KB  
Article
Sensory Architecture in Relation to Quality of Life in Older Adults: An Evidence-Based Design Approach
by Jaqueline D. Ubillus and Emilio J. Medrano-Sanchez
Buildings 2026, 16(8), 1498; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081498 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 735
Abstract
The accelerated aging of the population in vulnerable urban contexts poses significant challenges for architecture, particularly with regard to the quality of life of older adults. Within this framework, the present study aimed to analyze the association between sensory architecture and the quality [...] Read more.
The accelerated aging of the population in vulnerable urban contexts poses significant challenges for architecture, particularly with regard to the quality of life of older adults. Within this framework, the present study aimed to analyze the association between sensory architecture and the quality of life of older adults and to translate this empirical evidence into context-informed design criteria for the development of a comprehensive center for older adults. The study adopted a quantitative approach with a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and correlational design. A structured questionnaire on sensory architecture and quality of life was administered to family members and caregivers acting as proxy respondents, demonstrating high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α>0.90). Given the ordinal nature of the data, inferential analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rho coefficient. Within the analyzed dataset, the results revealed a statistically significant and strong association between sensory architecture and the quality of life of older adults (ρ > 0.80). At the dimensional level, visual and tactile stimuli exhibited the highest associations, followed by the social relationships dimension, while therapeutic environments showed a moderate association, allowing the identification of an empirical hierarchy among the analyzed dimensions within this dataset. These findings support the interpretation of sensory architecture as a construct statistically associated with indicators of quality of life, from a non-causal perspective. Based on this hierarchy, the results were articulated into an evidence-based architectural structure, serving as analytical input to inform context-specific criteria for spatial organization, materiality, comfort, orientation, and social interaction derived from the observed statistical associations. The study contributes a methodological approach that systematically connects correlational quantitative findings with architectural design considerations, particularly in urban contexts characterized by limited specialized infrastructure. However, a key limitation is the use of proxy respondents (family members and caregivers), which should be considered when interpreting the results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 5626 KB  
Article
The View from the Window—Assessment by the “View Owner” and the “View Observers”
by Barbara Szybinska Matusiak, Mandana Sarey Khanie, Natalia Sokol, Aicha Diakite-Kortlever, Valerio Roberto Maria Lo Verso, Laura Bellia, Francesca Fragliasso and Melissa Mittelstädt
Buildings 2026, 16(2), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020371 - 15 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1493
Abstract
Access to an unobstructed view of the outside through a window has been shown to play a critical role in supporting occupants’ visual comfort, psychological well-being, and cognitive performance, as it provides environmental connection and reduces stress. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Access to an unobstructed view of the outside through a window has been shown to play a critical role in supporting occupants’ visual comfort, psychological well-being, and cognitive performance, as it provides environmental connection and reduces stress. The aim of this study was to investigate how window view assessment ratings differ between “view owners” (individuals with long-term experience of the view) and “view observers” (those who view photos of a view). Findings from 12 in-person workshops on window view assessment are presented. The participants were 207 students from six European universities. Each participant presented their window view as “view owner”, while the remining students rated it on the 1–9 Likert scale as “view observers”. The ratings given by the “view owners” (prior to workshops) were significantly higher than those given by the “view observers”, showing the influence of familiarity and long-term experience. The additional contextual information about the interior and narrative descriptions provided orally by the “view owners” had a small positive effect. Night views were rated lower than day views by the “view observers”. The findings highlight the impact of long-term experience on the assessment of the window view and encourage the inclusion of night-view in recommendations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop