applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advanced Technologies in Oral Surgery—2nd Edition

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 September 2026 | Viewed by 4862

Special Issue Editor

Clinical Microbiology, School of Dentistry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
Interests: oral surgery; biomaterials; implantology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I cordially extend my invitation for you to contribute your valuable research and work to our Special Issue. You are welcome to contribute original scientific papers, reviews, short communications, and case reports.

This Issue highlights advancements in surgical techniques, including minimally invasive methods, robotic-assisted surgery, and digital planning systems. These innovations enhance precision, patient comfort, and recovery speed. We also delve into the world of biomaterials, exploring their vital role in implantology, prosthetics, and tissue regeneration, all contributing to successful reconstructive procedures and dental implants. Collaboration across medical disciplines is central to modern healthcare. This Special Issue underscores the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork involving oral and maxillofacial surgeons, dentists, medical specialists, and researchers. This collaboration offers a holistic perspective on oral and maxillofacial health and its impact on overall well-being. Furthermore, our SI addresses the specific challenges and considerations when it comes to pregnant patients requiring oral and maxillofacial surgical interventions. We emphasize a patient-centered approach, focusing on the well-being of both the expectant mother and the unborn child. Our SI is a dedicated space to display the newest advancements and innovations in oral and maxillofacial surgery, focusing on the point where cutting-edge research, technology, and practice come together to improve patient care, surgery results, and the field’s overall progress.

I look forward to receiving your insightful contributions and sharing your expertise with our readers. Together, we can continue to advance the field and ensure the highest standards of patient care!

Dr. Aida Meto
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • oral surgery
  • surgical techniques
  • biomaterials
  • implantology
  • maxillofacial reconstruction
  • anesthesia
  • pain management
  • 3D printing
  • regenerative medicine
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • robotic surgery
  • digital planning
  • tissue engineering
  • dental implants
  • interdisciplinary collaboration
  • patient care
  • pregnancy
  • surgical innovation
  • technological innovations
  • case studies
  • clinical insights
  • oral health

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 426 KB  
Article
Long-Term Evaluation of One-Piece Versus Two-Piece Zirconia Dental Implants: Retrospective Study Up to 10-Year Follow-Up
by Antonino Palazzolo, Francesca Argenta, Riccardo Scaringi, Costanza Albrigi, Eugenio Romeo and Stefano Storelli
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 3977; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083977 - 19 Apr 2026
Viewed by 512
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic performance of zirconia dental implants with one-piece and two-piece configurations supporting single-tooth restorations. The primary outcome was implant survival, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of interproximal [...] Read more.
Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic performance of zirconia dental implants with one-piece and two-piece configurations supporting single-tooth restorations. The primary outcome was implant survival, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of interproximal marginal bone loss (MBL) over time. Materials and methods: A total of 67 implants placed in 55 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 60.6 months. Forty-five implants were one-piece systems and twenty-two were two-piece systems. All surgical and prosthetic procedures were performed by the same operator, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Final restorations were delivered three months after implant placement. Marginal bone levels were assessed radiographically at the time of definitive prosthesis delivery (T0) and at the last follow-up examination (T1). Statistical significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). Results: The overall implant survival rate was 100% in both groups. One-piece implants showed higher initial MBL values than two-piece implants; however, bone level changes over time were limited in both configurations, with no significant intra-group differences between T0 and T1. Conclusions: Both implant configurations showed excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, with a 100% survival rate and limited marginal bone loss during long-term follow-up. Marginal bone levels appeared to be influenced more by implant neck design than by implant configuration, suggesting that zirconia implants with a smooth transmucosal design may represent a reliable metal-free option for single-tooth rehabilitation in properly selected patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Oral Surgery—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1985 KB  
Article
Individualized Management of Low-Flow Maxillofacial Vascular Malformations: Case Reports Integrated with an Evidence-Based Narrative Synthesis
by Norma Guadalupe Ibáñez-Mancera, Eric Partida Rodríguez, Benjamín Gonzalo Rodríguez-Méndez, Régulo López-Callejas, Ilan Vinitzky Brener and Diego Medina-Castro
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 1729; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041729 - 10 Feb 2026
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Vascular anomalies (VAs) in the maxillofacial region represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to their complex angioarchitecture and the risk of severe hemorrhage. According to the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA), these are categorized into vascular tumors and [...] Read more.
Vascular anomalies (VAs) in the maxillofacial region represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to their complex angioarchitecture and the risk of severe hemorrhage. According to the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA), these are categorized into vascular tumors and malformations. While clinical management has traditionally relied on surgery and sclerotherapy, innovative bioelectrical and electrochemical modalities are emerging as effective alternatives. This study employed an integrated bimodal framework, combining a systematic narrative synthesis of 42 high-impact articles with a retrospective analysis of five individualized clinical cases (n = 5). Diagnostic accuracy was ensured through a standardized triad including clinical phenotyping, color Doppler ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The clinical application of individualized protocols—including 3% polidocanol, copper tip-induced thrombosis, and nonthermal plasma (NTP)—resulted in total lesion stability (100% success rate) without significant adverse events. NTP application (13.56 MHz; 15 W) in complex cases (e.g., Sjögren’s disease) showed superior tissue regeneration and accelerated fibroplasia. The convergence of international evidence and clinical experience validates the efficacy of a graded therapeutic algorithm for low-flow malformations. This individualized protocol acts as a new treatment approach with special benefits over conventional treatment methods, being supported by both clinical evidence and advanced diagnostic mapping. This synergy offers a robust foundation for future prospective trials in maxillofacial surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Oral Surgery—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 464 KB  
Review
The Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Orthognathic Surgery: Pre- and Postoperative Phases—A Scoping Review
by Federica Lugas, Roberto Schirru, Francesco Bustio Dettori, Alessio Verdecchia and Enrico Spinas
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 10223; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810223 - 19 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3492
Abstract
Clear aligners are increasingly used as an alternative to fixed appliances in orthognathic surgery, particularly for skeletal Class III malocclusions. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of clear aligners in the pre- and postoperative phases of surgical treatment and was conducted [...] Read more.
Clear aligners are increasingly used as an alternative to fixed appliances in orthognathic surgery, particularly for skeletal Class III malocclusions. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of clear aligners in the pre- and postoperative phases of surgical treatment and was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey. Data extraction considered study design, country, sample characteristics, surgical protocol, orthodontic biomechanics, use of auxiliaries, and cephalometric outcomes. Seven studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included. They involved 120 adult patients treated with Invisalign® combined with Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. All studies reported skeletal improvements, particularly in ANB angle and Wits appraisal, with maintenance of vertical dimensions. Clear aligners facilitated presurgical dental decompensation, torque control, and postsurgical occlusal refinement, with auxiliaries and digital tools enhancing predictability. Despite variability in protocols and limited long-term follow-up, outcomes were comparable to those achieved with fixed appliances. Current evidence supports the clinical viability of integrating clear aligners into orthognathic surgery, although standardized protocols and further high-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Oral Surgery—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop