applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Kinematics, Motion Planning and Control of Robotics

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Mechanical Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 April 2026) | Viewed by 1684

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Industrial Machines and Equipment, Engineering Faculty, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania
Interests: robotic design; system optimisation; autonomous robots; machine learning; adaptive robotics; multi-robot systems; human–robot Interaction; energy efficiency; real-time control; AI integration in robotics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Industrial Machines and Equipment Department, Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania
Interests: robotics; mechatronics; metal forming; hydraulic and pneumatic driving systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Industrial Machines and Equipment, Faculty of Engineering, "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, 550025 Sibiu, Romania
Interests: CAD/CAE/CAM; industrial automation; PLCs; industrial robots; CNC systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Kinematics, motion planning, and robotics control are essential fields in modern engineering and technology. These areas are driving innovations that are transforming industries and everyday life. As robots become more integrated into sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, and service industries, the importance of precise and efficient motion control is crucial. Kinematic analysis provides the foundation for understanding robot movements, while advanced motion planning algorithms enable robots to navigate complex environments seamlessly. Robust control mechanisms ensure that these systems operate reliably and accurately, even in dynamic and unpredictable settings.

This Special Issue aims to explore the latest innovations and research in kinematics, motion planning, and control of robotic systems. We are interested in contributions that push the boundaries of current knowledge and address the following (and related) themes:

  • Innovative kinematic models and their applications in robotics.
  • Advanced motion planning techniques for autonomous systems.
  • Robotics control in dynamic environments.
  • Development and application of anthropomorphic and redundant robots.
  • Integration of AI, including fuzzy logic and neural networks, in robotics control.
  • Real-time control strategies and their implementation.
  • Multi-robot coordination and collaborative robotics.
  • Enhancing human–robot interaction for safer and more efficient systems.
  • Applications in specialized fields such as medical robotics, agricultural automation, and service robotics.
  • Use of machine learning for improved robotics control and motion planning.

We invite original research articles that provide new insights and practical solutions, as well as review papers that summarize recent developments and emerging trends in these critical areas. Through this collection, we aim to foster a deeper understanding and spark innovative ideas that will shape the future of robotics.

Dr. Mihai Crenganiş
Prof. Dr. Sever-Gabriel Racz
Prof. Dr. Radu-Eugen Breaz
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • kinematics
  • motion planning
  • robotics control
  • anthropomorphic robots
  • redundant robots
  • AI in robotics
  • fuzzy logic
  • neural networks
  • autonomous systems
  • multi-robot coordination
  • human–robot interaction
  • dynamic environments
  • real-time control
  • medical robotics
  • agricultural automation
  • service robotics
  • advanced algorithms
  • machine learning
  • collaborative robotics
  • innovative kinematic models

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 6023 KB  
Article
Comparative Modeling and Experimental Validation of Two Four-Wheel Omnidirectional Locomotion Architectures for a Modular Mobile Robot
by Iosif-Adrian Maroșan, Alexandru Bârsan, George Constantin, Sever-Gabriel Racz, Radu-Eugen Breaz, Claudia-Emilia Gîrjob, Mihai Crenganiș and Cristina-Maria Biriș
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 3646; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083646 - 8 Apr 2026
Viewed by 492
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative modeling and experimental validation study for a modular four-wheel omnidirectional mobile robot, focusing on two locomotion architectures implemented on the same platform: four omni wheels (90° rollers) and four Mecanum wheels (45° rollers). Both configurations were evaluated under [...] Read more.
This paper presents a comparative modeling and experimental validation study for a modular four-wheel omnidirectional mobile robot, focusing on two locomotion architectures implemented on the same platform: four omni wheels (90° rollers) and four Mecanum wheels (45° rollers). Both configurations were evaluated under identical benchmark conditions on a 1 m × 1 m square path (4 m total path length), using the same nominal 12 V supply and the same test duration, in order to ensure a fair and reproducible cross-architecture comparison. A MATLAB/Simulink–Simscape dynamic model was developed for both architectures, while experimental validation was performed using Hall-effect current sensors integrated into the drive modules. Based on the measured and simulated motor currents, a 12 V-based electrical input-power estimate was evaluated at both motor and robot level. For the considered benchmark, the four-Mecanum configuration exhibited a lower measured input-power estimate than the four-omni configuration (17.88 W vs. 25.75 W), corresponding to an approximate reduction of 30.6% under the adopted assumptions. At robot level, the deviation between simulated and measured total input-power estimate was 3.70% for the four-omni architecture and 21.42% for the four-Mecanum architecture, indicating higher predictive agreement for the omni-wheel model in its present form. The comparative analysis also suggests that wheel–ground interaction and roller geometry influence not only the measured current demand but also the level of agreement between simulation and experiment. Although the present study is limited to a single standardized benchmark and nominal-voltage conditions, it provides a controlled basis for comparing the two locomotion solutions and for identifying directions for further model refinement. The findings should therefore be interpreted as benchmark-specific comparative results offering practical guidance for locomotion architecture selection and for future refinement of friction-aware omnidirectional robot models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinematics, Motion Planning and Control of Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop