Public Management in the 21st Century: Innovations and Challenges in Governance

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 3635

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700505 Iasi, Romania
Interests: HRM in public sector; public servants; training and carreer in public administration; strategic management in public sector; public policies; public management; education for sustainability; higher education institutions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Comparative and International Studies, Tirana, Albania
Interests: public administration; public management; governance; public policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The landscape of public management is undergoing profound transformations driven by technological, social, economic, and political change, and consequently this Special Issue seeks to advance scholarly understanding of how public management is adapting to these challenges, with a focus on innovations in governance, administrative reforms, and multi-actor collaboration. We welcome theoretical, empirical, and comparative studies that illuminate both the opportunities and obstacles shaping public management in the 21st century.

Central to the Special Issue is the exploration of integrative and networked governance models, emphasizing how collaborative approaches, digital tools, and inclusive leadership can enhance public service delivery and policy outcomes. Integrative public leadership, for example, is increasingly recognized as essential for managing boundary-crossing collaborations across sectors and navigating complex societal problems, emphasizing the alignment of structures, processes, and actor relationships (Parkkinen, 2024). Collaborative governance remains a core theme, as modern public administration increasingly involves multi-stakeholder arrangements that extend beyond hierarchical state structures. Research demonstrates that cross-sector collaboration can enhance problem-solving capacity, accountability, and public value creation, particularly in contexts where social, economic, and environmental challenges intersect (Sørensen & Torfing, 2021).

The Special Issue also addresses the digital transformation of public management, including the integration of artificial intelligence, data analytics, and digital platforms into administrative processes. Recent public management research has emphasized the importance of data availability, data quality, and digital technologies in shaping public sector innovation, transparency, and public value. Digital government is increasingly recognized as a critical driver of co-production and governance improvement; however, few studies have systematically explored its theoretical and practical implications for public management, highlighting a significant gap in the literature (Gil-Garcia, Dawes & Pardo, 2018). Studies show that digital governance has the potential to improve performance, transparency, and civic engagement, while also introducing challenges such as information overload, institutional adaptation, and equity in access (Vigoda-Gadot & Mizrahi, 2024; Guenduez et al., 2025).

Further, the Special Issue encourages contributions examining public management responses to societal challenges such as labor market transformations, social inequalities, demographic shifts, climate change, and crisis management. Research highlights that effective governance in these areas requires inclusive, multi-level approaches that integrate state and non-state actors, civil society, and private sector stakeholders. Comparative analyses of governance innovations across institutional contexts can provide critical insights into the diverse mechanisms through which public management adapts and evolves.

Finally, accountability, transparency, ethics, and legitimacy remain central concerns. Recent empirical evidence suggests that e-government initiatives and collaborative governance arrangements can enhance regulatory quality, government effectiveness, and stakeholder trust, though success is highly context-dependent (Zou, Q. et al., 2023). Contributions addressing these dimensions will help elucidate how modern public management balances innovation with responsible governance practices.

By bringing together these themes, the Special Issue aims to offer a comprehensive, forward-looking understanding of public management, highlighting innovations, challenges, and the evolving interplay between governance structures, leadership, technology, and societal demands.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 300–500 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send this to the Guest Editors (bercu@uaic.ro; nevilasokoli@gmail.com) or to the Administrative Sciences Editorial Office (admsci@mdpi.com) before 31 May 2026. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

References

Guenduez, A. A., Demircioglu, M. A., Mueller, E. M., & Cinar, E. (2025). Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy, 54(8), 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274.

Parkkinen, J. (2024). Integrative public leadership: A systematic review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 38(4), 426–447.

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). Accountable government through collaborative governance? Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040127.

Vigoda-Gadot, E., Mizrahi, Z. (2024). The digital governance puzzle: Towards integrative theory of humans, machines, and organizations in public management. Technology in Society, 77, 102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102530.

Zou, Q., Mao, Z., Yan, R., Liu, S., Duan, Z. (2023). Vision and reality of e-government for governance improvement: Evidence from global cross-country panel data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122667.

Ramon Gil-Garcia, J., Dawes, S.S., Pardo, T.A. (2018) Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads, Public Management Review, 20:5, 633-646, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181.

Prof. Dr. Ana-Maria Bercu
Prof. Dr. Nevila Xhindi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • public management
  • governance
  • digitalisation
  • smart cities
  • policy
  • innovation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 318 KB  
Article
University Transfer Architectures for Smart Governance: A Regional Comparison of Scientific Community Building
by Christian Schachtner and Catalin Vrabie
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16070323 - 6 Jul 2026
Abstract
Universities are increasingly expected to contribute not only to teaching and research, but also to public-sector innovation, regional development, and digitally enabled governance. This article examines how higher education institutions organize that contribution by comparing two university-based transfer architectures: Smart-EDU Hub @ SNSPA [...] Read more.
Universities are increasingly expected to contribute not only to teaching and research, but also to public-sector innovation, regional development, and digitally enabled governance. This article examines how higher education institutions organize that contribution by comparing two university-based transfer architectures: Smart-EDU Hub @ SNSPA in Bucharest and the distributed transfer portfolio of RheinMain University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSRM). Using a qualitative comparative case-study design based on the document analysis of internal strategy and regulatory documents, institutional webpages, and European policy frameworks, the study analyzes the mission framing, organizational form, program architecture, trust infra-structure, and scaling logic. The documentary analysis indicates that Smart-EDU Hub is formally presented and institutionally organized as a centralized, branded, mission-led platform that bundles conferences, courses, projects, visiting scholars, and publication channels under a recognizable public-facing identity. HSRM, by contrast, is documented as a distributed transfer portfolio linking transfer strategy, dialogue formats, digitally supported teaching, administrative digitalization, continuing education, and AI support services. The comparison should therefore be read as an analysis of formal and publicly documented transfer architectures, not as an evaluation of actual institutional performance, stakeholder experience, or societal impact. The article contributes to Administrative Sciences by conceptualizing university transfer for smart governance as a public-management and governance-design problem. It develops an analytical hybrid transfer-architecture framework in which a visible hub is combined with distributed specialist nodes, shared quality assurance, and explicit safeguards for ethics, cybersecurity, and trustworthy AI. Full article
27 pages, 1064 KB  
Article
Collaborative Governance in Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): Focal Collaborative Elements and Outcomes for Internal Transparency
by Mathew Azarian, Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw and Tor Kristian Stevik
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16050220 - 4 May 2026
Viewed by 1509
Abstract
Public administration research provides structured explanations of collaborative governance. PPP scholarship, however, has largely emphasized macro governance frameworks, leaving micro-level collaborative drivers between internal partners underexplored. Additionally, internal transparency has seldom received attention as a governance outcome of collaboration. Building upon collaborative governance [...] Read more.
Public administration research provides structured explanations of collaborative governance. PPP scholarship, however, has largely emphasized macro governance frameworks, leaving micro-level collaborative drivers between internal partners underexplored. Additionally, internal transparency has seldom received attention as a governance outcome of collaboration. Building upon collaborative governance theories, this study conceptualizes collaboration in PPPs through four focal collaborative elements (FCEs): organizational capacity asymmetries, commitment to process, effective communication, and trust building. A survey instrument was used to collect experts’ opinions regarding the impact of PPP-specific characteristics, as practical mechanisms, on collaboration. The results show strong endorsement of mechanisms related to post-procurement capacity asymmetries, role/authority shifts, contractual complexity, and lifecycle discontinuities (staff changes and phase transitions). Such PPP characteristics undermine communication and information continuity. Trust building appeared to have an ambivalent role shaped by long-term incentives alongside goal drift and contractual rigidity. This study identifies the most salient mechanisms framing collaborative elements in PPP and translates them into governance implications for sustained collaboration and strengthened internal transparency across PPPs’ lifecycle. Limitations and future avenues for research based upon these findings are presented. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1070 KB  
Article
The Role of Regulatory Quality and the Rule of Law on Business Demographic Dynamics in the European Countries
by Elena Rusu Cigu and Marius Brănici
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16040186 - 14 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1047
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to precisely identify the impact of regulatory quality and the rule of law on business demographic dynamics in European countries during the 2015–2024 period. The first aim is to provide a theoretical approach by reviewing aspects of [...] Read more.
The aim of the paper is to precisely identify the impact of regulatory quality and the rule of law on business demographic dynamics in European countries during the 2015–2024 period. The first aim is to provide a theoretical approach by reviewing aspects of the regulatory system in European countries and the most relevant studies on the issue. The second aim is to develop a linear regression model to evaluate the roles of regulatory quality and the rule of law during periods of economic volatility and changing business demographics in European Countries. The OLS estimation technique for panel data models will be chosen. The results support the hypothesis of an institutional convergence effect, indicating that regulatory quality and the rule of law significantly enhance net firm performance creation, but this impact is conditional on the level of economic development. The paper offers a useful perspective on the complex relationship between regulatory quality and the rule of law in advancing business demographics and promoting performance in the business environment, thereby adding to the existing literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop