Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and Its Perception in Organization—2nd Edition

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387). This special issue belongs to the section "Gender, Race and Diversity in Organizations".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 3077

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Interests: organizational behavior and design; deviant workplace behavior; diversity management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Interests: accounting; accounting costs; diversity in the accounting profession

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity (DEI) are fundamental principles that contribute to a more dynamic, innovative, and ethical workplace. Organizations that actively promote DEI benefit from higher employee engagement, stronger decision-making, and improved business performance. However, the perception and implementation of DEI vary depending on organizational structures, industry sectors, and cultural contexts.

In recent decades, the view of diversity, equity, and inclusion in organizations has changed to a more strategic concept (Allen et al., 2008), with the creation of organizational policies and culture aimed at incorporating diversity, differences, and equity. However, organizations frequently fail in their efforts to carry out strategic diversity initiatives due to “systemic, structural, organizational, institutional, cultural, and societal obstacles” (El-Amin, 2022, p. 208). One of the questions that also arises with regard to recent diversity issues is whether this concept has truly led to significant changes in organizational cultures and policies, or if organizations have settled back into the status quo (Baum, 2021).

After the successful first Special Issue on this topic, this 2nd edition continues to examine the issue of diversity, inclusion, and equity and its perception in different organizational settings. Moreover, this Special Issue continues with the aim of further addressing the following:

  • The general trends in research and practice of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • The role and importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace.
  • Context and nature of diversity management policies and practices in organizations.
  • Perception of various antecedents and consequences of diversity, equity, and inclusion at the individual, group, and organizational levels.
  • Systemic, structural, organizational, institutional, cultural, and societal obstacles related to diversity, equity, and inclusion and its implementation in diverse organizational settings and workplaces.

Besides these proposed topics, we encourage other topics that review and question the existing research and practice on the issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion and its perception in organizations. Both review and research papers using various methodological approaches are welcomed.

Please feel free to contact the Guest Editors (aaleksic@efzg.hr and sbroz@efzg.hr) if you have any questions.

We look forward to your valuable submissions and input on this important and relevant subject.

Dr. Ana Aleksić Fredotović
Dr. Sanja Broz Tominac
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)
  • perceptions
  • organizations
  • workplace

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

42 pages, 1593 KB  
Article
Prediction and Ranking of Corporate Diversity in European and American Firms
by Iñigo Martín-Melero, Felipe Hernández-Perlines, Raúl Gómez-Martínez and María Luisa Medrano-García
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15110406 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Currently, corporate social responsibility and environmental/social/governance topics are gaining more relevance in business and finance. Attention to corporate diversity in boards and the workforce is included in this trend. Although most studies focus on executive boards and objective scores, the perception of diversity [...] Read more.
Currently, corporate social responsibility and environmental/social/governance topics are gaining more relevance in business and finance. Attention to corporate diversity in boards and the workforce is included in this trend. Although most studies focus on executive boards and objective scores, the perception of diversity by employees and its rankability are not fully understood or researched. In this paper, we analyze corporate diversity rankings from the perspective of predictive and prescriptive analytics. Inside predictive analytics, the perceived diversity of a sample of 350 European diversity leader companies is predicted by using three different feature sets (raw financial data, ratios and objective diversity variables) and three machine learning algorithms (K Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree). The best performing algorithm is the Decision Tree, and all three feature sets outperform one random dummy algorithm; the best performing set is the financial ratios set. Inside prescriptive analytics, several rankings involving American companies are intersected and compared in three exercises (studying diversity categorization, ethnic origin and comparing diversity with other unrelated metrics). From these, global rankings were built to search for the best possible agreement among the rankings. These results with both predictive and prescriptive analytics encourage managers to strategize and include diversity in management, as well as employ new technologies in their decision-making processes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 642 KB  
Article
Determinants of Job Performance in Professional Workers and Moderating Effect of Gender: The Peruvian Case
by Felipe Eduardo Yong-Chung, Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas, Ralphi Ricardo Jauregui Arroyo and Manuel Escobar-Farfán
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15100391 - 9 Oct 2025
Viewed by 771
Abstract
As the workforce adapts to evolving professional demands, working conditions simultaneously become increasingly stressful, competitive, and challenging, making it essential to examine the determinants of job performance among highly educated workers. This study investigates the influence of psychological capital, work–life balance, rewards, and [...] Read more.
As the workforce adapts to evolving professional demands, working conditions simultaneously become increasingly stressful, competitive, and challenging, making it essential to examine the determinants of job performance among highly educated workers. This study investigates the influence of psychological capital, work–life balance, rewards, and incentives, and work commitment on job performance among higher education professionals, with particular attention to gender differences. A survey was administered to 661 university-educated workers, and the data was analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM). Results demonstrate that psychological capital, work–life balance, and rewards and incentives positively influence job performance across both genders. However, the mediating effect of work commitment between rewards and incentives, work–life balance, and job performance was confirmed only among women. Work–life balance emerged as the primary factor influencing psychological capital, surpassing the impact of rewards and incentives. The findings reveal significant gender differences in professional commitment patterns, suggesting that women workers exhibit stronger emotional connections between organizational support mechanisms and performance outcomes. Practical implications emphasize the need for organizations to prioritize work–life balance strategies as foundational elements of human resource management, while implementing comprehensive reviews of gender equality policies to ensure equitable workplace experiences. This research contributes valuable insights for developing targeted interventions that optimize professional performance while addressing gender-specific workplace dynamics in emerging economies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 642 KB  
Review
Women in Dentistry: From Historical Milestones to Leadership in the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda
by Rocío Trinidad Velázquez-Cayón and Pilar Martín Balbuena
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050182 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 1456
Abstract
This review offers a historical overview of the role of women in the modern dental profession, tracing their journey from the earliest pioneers to the present day and highlighting their significant achievements. The second main section presents a narrative analysis of the current [...] Read more.
This review offers a historical overview of the role of women in the modern dental profession, tracing their journey from the earliest pioneers to the present day and highlighting their significant achievements. The second main section presents a narrative analysis of the current situation, focusing on the main challenges faced by female dentists in advancing their careers in clinical practice, academia, and leadership roles. Finally, the discussion connects these issues with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda and explores support models for women’s empowerment in the health sciences, with a particular emphasis on dentistry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop