Next Article in Journal
How Family Living Arrangements and Migration Distances Shape the Settlement Intentions of Rural Migrant Workers in China
Previous Article in Journal
Tobacco Use and Cessation Counseling among Dental Professionals in Saudi Arabia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192316307
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does the Intensity of the Headache Differ According to the Level of Neck Disability in Chronic Migraine Patients?

by
Dilara Onan
1,2,* and
Paolo Martelletti
2,3,*
1
Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey
2
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
3
Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, 000189 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16307; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316307
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic migraine (CM) patients who report a high frequency and intensity of headaches also report neck pain (NP) and neck disability (ND) in neck activities that require stability. In this context, CM patients may report different headache intensities at different levels of ND. Our aim in this study is to investigate whether the intensity of headaches differs according to the level of ND in CM patients. Headache intensity and NP intensity were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and ND was evaluated with the Neck Disability Index (NDI). A total of 142 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The mean age was 53.24 ± 12.08 years. The median number of monthly headache days was 20. According to VAS, the median headache intensity was 10(4–10) cm and the median of NP intensity was 9(1–10) cm. The mean NDI was 28.45 ± 10.28. There was a difference in headache intensity between mild and severe disability levels (p = 0.007, Z = −3.289); headache intensity between mild and complete disability levels (p = 0.000, Z = −4.421); and headache intensity between moderate and complete disability levels (p = 0.004, Z = −2.212). Although the difference in headache intensity between ND levels is small, a median increase of 2 cm in headache intensity at mild ND levels may result in complete ND. A median increase of 1 cm in headache intensity at the moderate ND level may cause complete disability in the neck. According to our results, the intensity of headaches of CM patients differed according to the level of ND. We consider our results to be clinically important in this context.
Keywords:
chronic migraine; headache; neck pain; neck disability level; neck disability index
Key Contribution: In patients with chronic migraine-related neck pain and disability, a 1 or 2 cm median increase in headache may increase mild or moderate neck disability to complete disability. It is important to evaluate CM patients in terms of neck pain and disability in clinics.

1. Introduction

Migraine is a disease that progresses with attacks and may be accompanied by headaches, vomiting, nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia. Chronic migraine is defined as a headache with migraine features on at least 15 days or more per month, for more than three months, and on at least 8 days of the headache days [1]. The result of these accompanying problems and the chronicity of the migraine can lead to disability and reduced quality of life [2,3].
Neck pain, one of the problems that can be seen together with migraine, is one of the most common complaints of patients [4,5]. One mechanism considered in the relationship between migraine and neck pain is that nociceptive stimulation from the dura mater and cervical musculoskeletal structures combines with secondary neurons in the trigeminocervical complex, and causes activation as a result of long-term stimulation of the caudal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve [6,7,8,9]. Neck pain is twice as common in chronic migraine as in episodic migraine, and neck disability is associated with chronic migraine [10]. According to the Global Burden Disease study 2019, headache disorders are ranked 3rd for both sexes and all ages, and 1st for both genders and ages 15–49 [11]. In a 2010 study, it was stated that neck pain ranks 4th among the diseases that cause global disability [12].
In a meta-analysis published in 2022, it was recommended to conduct studies with tools such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI), which evaluates disability in order to better define the problem of neck pain in migraine patients [5]. The NDI assesses neck pain intensity, self-care, lifting, reading, headache intensity, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and leisure activities [13]. As the deterioration in these activities, which affect daily life and include postural arrangements, increases, the level of disability also increases [10]. In Florencio’s study on chronic migraine patients, when the parameters evaluated in the NDI were listed, it was found that headache was the first among the answers with the highest disability, followed by the activity of reading and lifting [10]. On the other hand, considering the parameters it includes, the NDI score is a complex evaluator of migraine disability and neck disability affected by hypersensitivity [14]. Although literature studies have reported the relationship between neck pain and disability in chronic migraine patients, it has been stated that it is not known whether the reason behind the neck disability is a local muscle disorder due to migraine-induced disuse or impaired motor cortical origin [15]. Causes related to neck disability in chronic migraine have been investigated, it has been reported that the cervical region has less mobility without differences in muscle activity [16,17,18], neck movement speed, and craniocervical test endurance performance are lower [16,19]. However, some comments have reported that craniocervical test performance does not adequately reflect neck disability in chronic migraine [20]. Therefore, it is a matter of curiosity to investigate the neck-related complaints of chronic migraine patients.
When headache and neck disability are considered in chronic migraine patients, neck disability levels may vary due to migraine-induced disuse of the neck and head or pain inhibition. Although there are uncertainties in the causes of neck disability, it is known that the frequency of headache is related to neck disability [18]. Therefore, the intensity of headache may vary depending on the level of neck disability. As far as we know, there is no study investigating whether the intensity of headache differs according to the level of neck disability. The literature has made possible causes and general NDI assessments. Therefore, our aim in this study is to investigate whether the intensity of headache varies according to the level of neck disability in chronic migraine patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study is a retrospective open-label real-world study with ethical approval from Sapienza University (CE 5773_2020). The study was conducted between September and November 2022 in Sapienza University Sant’Andrea Hospital Headache Center in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine, by an internist with headache expertise according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria 3rd edition [1]. All patients gave consent for routine evaluations. The inclusion criteria of the study were to be diagnosed with chronic migraine and to be between the ages of 18–65. The use of any painkiller or specific migraine medication was permitted as needed and was recorded in the Headache Diary. Exclusion criteria were the diagnosis of any accompanying headache other than chronic migraine, diagnosis of any pathology in the cervical spine, acute infection-fracture-inflammatory condition, and any systemic disease.

2.2. Outcome Measures

Neck disability level with Neck Disability Index (NDI), headache intensity, and neck pain intensity with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was assessed. The age, body mass index, and monthly headache days of patients were recorded.
The NDI contains 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5, including neck pain, headache, weightlifting, reading, sleep, driving, work, self-care, concentration, and recreation (0–4 points = no disability, 5–14 points = mild, 14–24 points = moderate, 25–34 points = severe, 35 and above = complete disability) [13,21]. Headache and neck pain intensity was evaluated using the VAS. Patients selected their pain levels by marking them on a horizontal line between 0–10 cm (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) [22]. The number of monthly headache days was recorded from the monthly headache diaries of the patients.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The IBM SPSS statistical 23.0 software was used for the analyses. The probability plots, histograms, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk’s test of normality analyzed whether the numerical data were normally distributed. The results were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and minimum-maximum for continuous variables; number (n) and percentage (%) were given for categorical variables. The Kruskal–Wallis analysis was performed to compare headache intensity according to the level of neck disability (mild, moderate, severe, and complete). Statistical significance was accepted as p < 0.05 and The Bonferroni adjustment was used for the p value (0.05/4). The power analysis of the study was performed using the one-way ANOVA test. Alpha was 0.05, the effect size f-value was calculated as 0.37 and the power was found to be 0.97. Then, since the Kruskal–Wallis test is a non-parametric test, as suggested in the article by Prajapati et al., the Asymptotic Relative Efficiency (ARE) coefficient was multiplied by the power value found in the ANOVA test (0.955), and the power of the study for the Kruskal–Wallis test was found to be 0.926. The sample size (n = 142) was sufficient [23].

3. Results

A total of 142 patients who met the inclusion criteria. 90.1% of the sample were women. The mean age of the patients was 53.24 ± 12.08 years. The median migraine diagnosis year was 20. None of the patients studied were in the diagnostic range of Medication Overuse, according to the criteria of ICHD-3. The demographic and clinic information are presented in Table 1.
According to neck disability levels, 17 patients were at a mild level, 29 patients were at a moderate level, 55 patients were at a severe level, and 41 patients were at a complete disability level. All neck disability groups had a high headache intensity (Table 2). A Kruskal–Wallis test showed that headache intensity differed according to neck disability levels H(3) = 24.75, p = 0.000 (Table 2). Considering the disability levels, the headache intensity was the least at the mild neck level (Mdn = 8) compared to the other levels, while the headache intensity increased at the moderate neck level (Mdn = 9), and was at the highest neck level at the severe and complete neck levels (Mdn = 10) (Table 2). Post-hoc tests using an alpha level of 0.0125 (0.05/4) corrected for Bonferroni were used to compare all disability levels. There was a difference in headache intensity between mild and severe disability levels (p = 0.007, Z = −3.289). There was a difference in headache intensity between mild and complete disability levels (p = 0.000, Z = −4.421). There was a difference in headache intensity between moderate and complete disability levels (p = 0.004, Z = −2.212). None of the comparisons between other neck disability levels were significant after Bonferroni correction (all p > 0.0125) (Table 3). As a matter of fact, although the difference in headache intensity between the levels is small, an increase of 2 cm (as median) in headache intensity at a mild neck disability level may cause complete disability for the neck.

4. Discussion

This study investigated the intensity of headache in chronic migraine patients with different levels of neck disability. Headache intensity differed in chronic migraine patients according to neck disability levels. According to the results of post-hoc analysis, differences were determined between mild and severe disability levels, between mild and complete disability levels, and between moderate and complete disability levels.
When the spine is considered with all the muscles, joints, ligaments, and dura mater structures from the head to the coccyx, for example, as a result of the stimulation of the trigeminocervical junction, the neck region, which is the continuation of the chain, may also be affected by pain. There may be pain or movement limitations in this region, and neck stiffness may be reported by patients [24,25,26]. Stability and strength are required to sustain neck-related activity [10,27]. Considering the parameters evaluated in the neck disability questionnaire, weightlifting, reading, sleep, driving, work, self-care, and recreation activities require the strength and stability of the neck [13]. Therefore, muscle dysfunction is expected to be associated with chronic pain and disability [28].
Carvalho et al. evaluated chronic migraine patients in terms of neck disability and reported 28.8% no disability, 44.8% mild, 21.6% moderate, and 4.8% severe disability [29]. In the study of Rodriguez et al., 68 migraine patients reported neck pain. It was stated that 62 of these patients had neck disability and the median headache score was 8 points [20]. Neta et al. showed less mobility in the neck extensor muscle chain in chronic migraine patients compared to healthy female controls without headache (p < 0.05) [30]. In addition, when NDI levels were examined in chronic migraine patients, it was reported as 5% for none, 11% for mild, 19% for moderate, 30% for severe, and 33% for complete disability level [30]. In the study by Tolentino et al. in chronic migraine patients, it was stated that neck muscle strength may contribute to headache and neck pain (p < 0.05). In this study, the rates of patients by NDI level were reported as 19% for none, 51% for mild, 24% for moderate, and 6% for severe, and high neck disability indicates lower neck muscle strength (p < 0.05) [31]. Gil-Martinez et al. stated that neck disability was a predictive factor for headache for chronic migraine patients, and reported that the relationship between the neck disability score (NDI = 21 ± 8.8) and headache intensity was significant (r = 0.594, p < 0.001) [32]. Chronic migraine patients tend to report severe disability [33]. Carvalho et al., in their study, stated that the risk between severe neck disability and chronic migraine was 7.6 times and reported that chronic migraine patients had high disability scores and moderate-severe disability levels (p = 0.01) [33]. Florencio et al. detected neck disability in 92% of 65 chronic migraine patients (p < 0.001), and the mean headache intensity of the patients was 8.5 ± 1.5. 8% of the patients showed none, 35% mild, 31% moderate, 23% severe, and 3% complete disability level. In this study, it was emphasized that the risk of increase to mild (RR = 2.5), moderate (RR = 3.7), and severe (RR = 5.1) levels are significant (p < 0.05) [10]. The findings in our study support the literature results in terms of neck disability levels and headache intensity. The NDI includes 5 different levels, but in our results, none of the patients were at the no disability level. All patients had at least mild disabilities. In addition, when neck disability levels and headache intensity were examined, the mean NDI for mild disability (11.97%) was 10.58 ± 3.1, and the median for headache intensity was 8 cm; the mean NDI for moderate disability (20.42%) was 19.62 ± 3.55, and the median for headache intensity was 9 cm; the mean NDI for severe disability (38.73%) was 29.78 ± 2.55, and median for headache intensity was 10 cm; and the mean NDI for complete disability (28.87%) was 40.09 ± 4.75, and the median for headache intensity was 10 cm. Therefore, while the difference between the scores in NDI levels was high on average, the headache intensity of the patients was also high. These results indicate that in addition to the headache assessments of chronic migraine patients evaluated in the clinic, neck problems should also be evaluated. In chronic migraine patients with mild or moderate neck disability, a median increase of 1 or 2 cm in headache intensity may increase neck disability to severe or complete disability levels. It is also stated that neck disability in chronic migraine patients may be related to decreased mobility [17,18,19], and muscle strength-endurance [19] in the cervical region, while neck pain may develop due to persistent headache in migraine, due to non-use and to prevent further pain [15,16]. It is thought that these different results and interpretations may also be due to the heterogeneity of patient populations [29].
In light of the results of the literature studies and our findings, we think that evaluation and treatment methods may need to be shaped differently. In addition to drug therapy, patients can be given patient and pain education [34], a biopsychosocial model can be applied [35] or physical therapy and rehabilitation practices can be recommended [36]. Rezaeian et al. evaluated migraine patients in two groups as treatment and control groups and used myofascial release and stretching methods in the treatment group. In the treatment group, the NDI score decreased from 22.73 ± 7.12 to 9.42 ± 3.7 points (p < 0.001) [36]. Therefore, rehabilitation methods can be tried to reduce neck disability. On the other hand, Pinhero et al. suggested that research should be conducted during functional activities to understand the effect of cervical motor control on daily functional activities in migraine patients [16]. In general, we think that the findings of our study are of clinical relevance for further evaluation or treatment studies.
Our study has some limitations. First, due to the inherent nature of retrospective studies, and due to the fact that the results are not prospective, it is not possible to add evaluations for different time periods and therefore the results cannot be interpreted for different time periods [37]. On the other hand, as there was no control group in our study, we could not compare our results with episodic migraine patients or healthy controls. In addition, the generalizability of our study, which we conducted in a clinic where patients with headache-related problems applied, may be limited. In future studies, this situation can be generalized with different clinics and sample sizes. Finally, while NDI evaluates activities that require strength and stability, it also evaluates concentration and pain parameters, which can be affected by psychological, social, and work conditions [35,38]. Since our study was a retrospective study, we could not evaluate psychological, social, and work conditions. Therefore, it should be considered that pain and disability may be affected by the biopsychosocial situation.

5. Conclusions

Individuals with chronic migraine are prone to problems such as neck pain and disability. Patients with a mild or moderate level of neck disability may experience severe and complete neck disability with a 1 or 2-cm increase in headache according to VAS. So far, many literature studies have investigated the relationship between chronic migraine and neck problems, and neck mobility or muscle assessments that may cause it. It is understood that the results are generally at moderate-to-severe levels of neck disability, but there is no clear study reporting how much the intensity of headache changes according to neck disability. In our study, results were found that can present researchers and clinicians with the relationship between neck disability level and headache intensity as objective numerical data. In this respect, we think that our study contains clinically decisive and new guiding results in patient evaluations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.O. and P.M.; methodology, D.O.; software, D.O.; validation, D.O.; formal analysis, D.O.; investigation, D.O.; resources, D.O., P.M.; data curation, D.O.; writing—original draft preparation, D.O.; writing—review and editing, D.O., P.M.; visualization, P.M.; supervision, P.M.; project administration, P.M.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Sapienza University Ethics Committee (52 SA_2020 del Registro Pareri and 22/04/2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnold, M. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. In Cephalalgia, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 38, pp. 1–211. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kurt, A.; Turhan, B. Physiotherapy Management of Migraine Pain: Facial Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Versus Connective Tissue Massage. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2022, 33, 2328–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goksan, Y.B.; Acar, E.; Sancak, B.; Sayin, E.; Yalinay-Dikmen, P.; Ilgaz-Aydinlar, E. The role of metacognition, negative automatic thoughts and emotions in migraine-related disability among adult migraine patients. Psychol. Health Med. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Calhoun, A.H.; Ford, S.; Millen, C.; Finkel, A.G.; Truong, Y.; Nie, Y. The prevalence of neck pain in migraine. Headache 2010, 50, 1273–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Khazali, H.M.; Younis, S.; Al-Sayegh, Z.; Ashina, S.; Ashina, M.; Schytz, H.W. Prevalence of neck pain in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2022, 42, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aprill, C.; Axinn, M.J.; Bogduk, N. Occipital headaches stemming from the lateral atlanto-axial (C1–2) joint. Cephalalgia 2002, 22, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bartsch, T.; Goadsby, P.J. Increased responses in trigeminocervical nociceptive neurons to cervical input after stimulation of the dura mater. Brain 2003, 126, 1801–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goadsby, P.J. Migraine pathophysiology. Headache 2005, 45, S14–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bartsch, T. Migraine and the neck: New insights from basic data. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2005, 9, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Florencio, L.L.; Chaves, T.C.; Carvalho, G.F.; Gonçalves, M.C.; Casimiro, E.C.; Dach, F.; Bigal, M.E.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Neck pain disability is related to the frequency of migraine attacks: A cross-sectional study. Headache 2014, 54, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J.; Jensen, R.; Uluduz, D.; Katsarava, Z. Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign against Headache. Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: Findings from GBD2019. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hoy, D.; March, L.; Woolf, A.; Blyth, F.; Brooks, P.; Smith, E.; Vos, T.; Barendregt, J.; Blore, J.; Murray, C.; et al. The global burden of neck pain: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vernon, H.; Mior, S. The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 1991, 14, 409–415. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liang, Z.; Thomas, L.; Jull, G.; Treleaven, J. The Neck Disability Index Reflects Allodynia and Headache Disability but Not Cervical Musculoskeletal Dysfunction in Migraine. Phys. Ther. 2022, 102, pzac027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liang, Z.; Thomas, L.; Jull, G.; Treleaven, J. Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine. Arch. Physiother. 2021, 11, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pinheiro, C.F.; Oliveira, A.S.; Will-Lemos, T.; Florencio, L.L.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Dach, F.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Neck Active Movements Assessment in Women with Episodic and Chronic Migraine. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Florencio, L.L.; de Oliveira, A.S.; Pinheiro, C.F.; Will-Lemos, T.; Dach, F.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Comparison of cervical muscle isometric force between migraine subgroups or migraine-associated neck pain: A controlled study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oliveira-Souza, A.I.S.; Florencio, L.L.; Carvalho, G.F.; Fernández-De-Las-Peñas, C.; Dach, F.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Reduced flexion rotation test in women with chronic and episodic migraine. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2019, 23, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bragatto, M.M.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D.; Benatto, M.T.; Lodovichi, S.S.; Pinheiro, C.F.; Carvalho, G.F.; Dach, F.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Florencio, L.L. Is the presence of neck pain associated with more severe clinical presentation in patients with migraine? A cross-sectional study. Cephalalgia 2019, 39, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rodrigues, A.; Florencio, L.L.; Martins, J.; Bragatto, M.M.; Fernández-de-Las-Penãs, C.; Dach, F.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Craniocervical flexion test in patients with migraine: Discriminative validity and accuracy. Int. J. Clin. Pr. 2021, 75, e14248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Monticone, M.; Ferrante, S.; Vernon, H.; Rocca, B.; Dal Farra, F.; Foti, C. Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012, 37, E1038–E1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Price, D.D.; McGrath, P.A.; Rafii, A.; Buckingham, B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983, 17, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Prajapati, B.; Dunne, M.; Armstrong, R. Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optom. Today 2010, 16, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  24. Langevin, H.M. Connective tissue: A body-wide signaling network? Med. Hypotheses 2006, 66, 1074–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McKenney, K.; Elder, A.S.; Elder, C.; Hutchins, A. Myofascial release as a treatment for orthopaedic conditions: A systematic review. J. Athl. Train. 2013, 48, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Messina, R.; Cetta, I.; Colombo, B.; Filippi, M. Tracking the evolution of non-headache symptoms through the migraine attack. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Falla, D.L.; Jull, G.A.; Hodges, P.W. Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004, 29, 2108–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’Leary, S.; Falla, D.; Elliott, J.M.; Jull, G. Muscle dysfunction in cervical spine pain: Implications for assessment and management. J. Orthop Sport. Phys. Ther. 2009, 39, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Carvalho, G.F.; Lodovichi, S.S.; Pinheiro, C.F.; Benatto, M.T.; Florencio, L.L.; Bragatto, M.M.; Dach, F.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. The presence of aura is not related to changes in the cervical performance and mobility of patients with migraine. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pr. 2021, 51, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Neta, T.C.M.C.; Tenório, A.D.S.; Oliveira-Souza, A.I.S.; Chagas, A.C.S.; Rocha-Filho, P.A.S.; Villela, D.W.; de Oliveira, D.A. Neck and back muscle chains hypomobility in women with migraine. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2021, 28, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tolentino, G.A.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D.; Carvalho, G.F.; Carnevalli, A.P.O.; Dach, F.; Florencio, L.L. Relationship Between Headaches and Neck Pain Characteristics With Neck Muscle Strength. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2018, 41, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gil-Martínez, A.; Navarro-Fernández, G.; Mangas-Guijarro, M.Á.; Lara-Lara, M.; López-López, A.; Fernández-Carnero, J.; La Touche, R. Comparison Between Chronic Migraine and Temporomandibular Disorders in Pain-Related Disability and Fear-Avoidance Behaviors. Pain Med. 2017, 18, 2214–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Carvalho, G.F.; Chaves, T.C.; Gonçalves, M.C.; Florencio, L.L.; Braz, C.A.; Dach, F.; Fernández de Las Peñas, C.; Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. Comparison between neck pain disability and cervical range of motion in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: A cross-sectional study. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2014, 37, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Meise, R.; Schwarz, A.; Luedtke, K. Effectiveness of Patient Education and Cognitive Behavioural Treatment as a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Migraine in Adults–A Systematic Review. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2022, 4, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosignoli, C.; Ornello, R.; Onofri, A.; Caponnetto, V.; Grazzi, L.; Raggi, A.; Leonardi, M.; Sacco, S. Applying a biopsychosocial model to migraine: Rationale and clinical implications. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rezaeian, T.; Ahmadi, M.; Mosallanezhad, Z.; Nourbakhsh, M.R. The impact of myofascial release and stretching techniques on the clinical outcomes of migraine headache: A randomized controlled trial. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2021, 26, 45. [Google Scholar]
  37. Talari, K.; Goyal, M. Retrospective studies-utility and caveats. J. R. Coll. Physicians Edinb. 2020, 50, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krøll, L.S.; Hammarlund, C.S.; Westergaard, M.L.; Nielsen, T.; Sloth, L.B.; Jensen, R.H.; Gard, G. Level of physical activity, well-being, stress and self-rated health in persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain. J. Headache Pain 2017, 18, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. The Demographic and Clinic Information.
Table 1. The Demographic and Clinic Information.
VariablesMean (SD) or Median
(Min–Max) or n (%)
Age (years)53.24 ± 12.08
Sex
  Female
  Male		128 (90.1%)
14 (9.9%)
BMI (kg/m2)23.9
(14.70–36.60)
Headache Diagnosis (years)20
(2–48)
Monthly Headache Days 20
(4–30)
Headache Intensity (VAS)10
(4–10)
Neck Pain Intensity (VAS)9
(1–10)
Neck Disability Level (NDI)28.45 ± 10.28
BMI: Body Mass Index, SD: Standard Deviation, VAS: Visual Analog Scale, NDI: Neck Disability Index.
Table
Table 2. The Kruskal–Wallis Test Results and The Headache Intensity and Disability Scores According to Neck Disability Levels.
Table 2. The Kruskal–Wallis Test Results and The Headache Intensity and Disability Scores According to Neck Disability Levels.
NDI Levelsn (%)Mean RankX2pMean (SD)/
Median (Min–Max)
(NDI)(VAS)
Mild17 (11.97)40.9724.750.00010.58 ± 3.1/
11 (6–14)		8(5–10)/
8.12 ± 1.45
Moderate 29 (20.42)58.2219.62 ± 3.55/
20 (12–24)		9 (6–10)/
8.76 ± 1.21
Severe 55 (38.73)74.7529.78 ± 2.55/
30 (25–34)		10 (4–10)/
9.24 ± 1.15
Complete 41
(28.87)		89.240.09 ± 4.75/
38 (33–50)		10 (5–10)/
9.59 ± 1.0
VAS: Visual Analog Scale, NDI: Neck Disability Index, SD: Standard Deviation.
Table
Table 3. The Post-Hoc Test Results.
Table 3. The Post-Hoc Test Results.
NDI LevelsTest StatisticsStd ErrorStd. Test StatisticSig.Adj. Sig.
Mild-Moderate−17.25411.382−1.5160.1300.777
Mild-Severe−33.77510.340−3.2660.0010.007 *
Mild-Complete−48.22510.749−4.4860.0000.000 *
Moderate-Severe−16.5218.551−1.9320.0530.320
Moderate-Complete−30.9719.041−3.4250.0010.004 *
Severe-Complete−14.4507.688−1.8790.0600.361
NDI: Neck Disability Index, * p < 0.0125 according to Bonferroni-adjustment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Onan, D.; Martelletti, P. Does the Intensity of the Headache Differ According to the Level of Neck Disability in Chronic Migraine Patients? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316307

AMA Style

Onan D, Martelletti P. Does the Intensity of the Headache Differ According to the Level of Neck Disability in Chronic Migraine Patients? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):16307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Onan, Dilara, and Paolo Martelletti. 2022. "Does the Intensity of the Headache Differ According to the Level of Neck Disability in Chronic Migraine Patients?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 16307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316307

APA Style

Onan, D., & Martelletti, P. (2022). Does the Intensity of the Headache Differ According to the Level of Neck Disability in Chronic Migraine Patients? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop