Differential Effects of O-Benzyl-Serine on Sulfur Metabolism, Photosynthesis, and Growth in Two Species of Weeds

Abstract

Enzymes of the sulfur assimilation pathway represent promising candidates for selective herbicide development. This study investigated the effects of O-benzyl-serine (OBS), a newly identified inhibitor of O-acetylserine(thiol)-lyase (OAS-TL), on two C3 weed species, Ipomoea grandifolia and Euphorbia heterophylla. Plants were cultivated hydroponically for 12 days in the presence of OBS (0–500 µM). OBS inhibited root growth in both species in a dose-dependent manner, with I. grandifolia being more sensitive. OAS-TL activity decreased in the roots of I. grandifolia but increased in the leaves of E. heterophylla. Nutrient profiling revealed significant alterations in sulfur, magnesium, and calcium contents, associated with chlorosis and reduced root and leaf development. While photosynthetic performance appeared unaffected at the lowest OBS concentration tested (62.5 µM), higher doses drastically reduced leaf expansion, preventing further measurements. Given this marked decline in foliar development, it is reasonable to infer that the overall photosynthetic capacity of the plants was also negatively affected under severe OBS exposure. OBS also disrupted apical dominance, promoting lateral shoot formation. These findings demonstrate that OBS differentially affects sulfur metabolism and growth in a species- and organ-specific manner, supporting its potential as a prototype molecule for herbicides targeting novel biochemical pathways.

1. Introduction

Fully established plants rely on photosynthesis as their primary energy source, and a wide range of components, including macro and micronutrients, are essential throughout their development to sustain their intricate metabolic machinery. The macronutrients required in larger quantities include nitrogen (N), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), and sulfur (S), while the micronutrients, necessary in smaller amounts but equally critical, encompass iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), boron (B), chlorine (Cl), molybdenum (Mo), and nickel (Ni) [1]. Each of these nutrients is required in varying quantities depending on the species, and even within individual plant tissues, nutrient demands can fluctuate significantly [2]. Furthermore, these nutrients serve as integral components of specific molecules and play indispensable roles in a multitude of metabolic processes. For instance, nitrogen is a fundamental constituent of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, while phosphorus is critically involved in energy transfer processes, particularly through its role in ATP synthesis [3].

Sulfur is an essential macronutrient pivotal in various physiological processes critical for plant growth and development. It aids in seed production, chlorophyll formation, the development of root nodules in legumes, and the stabilization of protein structures. Additionally, sulfur is instrumental in the activation of numerous enzymes and contributes to the plant’s ability to combat environmental stressors [4,5]. Sulfur deficiency can lead to significant disruptions in plant development, manifesting as stem shortening and thinning, inadequate branching, chlorosis in young leaves, reduced leaf size and quantity, stunted height, premature leaf drop, and a decrease in overall biomass [6]. Moreover, sulfur is a crucial component of several essential biomolecules within plants. It is found in amino acids such as L-cysteine and L-methionine, as well as in key coenzymes including S-adenosylmethionine, coenzyme A, biotin, and thiamine pyrophosphate. Sulfur also forms integral parts of prosthetic groups, such as iron-sulfur (Fe-S) centers, which are vital for the functionality of various enzymes involved in electron transfer and redox reactions. Furthermore, sulfur is fundamental in the biosynthesis of critical compounds such as glutathione, glucosinolates, and sulfolipids, which play roles in antioxidant defense, plant signaling, and defense against pathogens [7,8,9].

Given the critical role of sulfur as an essential element for plant development and the absence of enzymes responsible for its assimilation in animals, it has been proposed that enzymes involved in the sulfur metabolism, such as cysteine synthase (CS), cystathionine γ-synthase (CGS), and cystathionine β-lyase (CBL), represent promising targets for the development of novel herbicides [10]. These enzymes are crucial to the synthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids, which are vital for protein formation and other metabolic processes in plants. Targeting these enzymes offers a strategic avenue for herbicide development, as their absence in animals enables selective action against unwanted plant species while minimizing potential risks to animal health.

The development of new herbicide targets is of paramount importance, particularly given the increasing incidence of herbicide-resistant weed species. A significant number of species have shown resistance to commercial herbicides, with reports indicating that up to 21 different sites of action are ineffective against certain resistant populations [11,12]. Furthermore, the intensive and recurrent use of herbicides has selected weed biotypes resistant to multiple sites of action, greatly complicating effective weed management strategies [13]. While alternatives to traditional chemical herbicides exist, such as crop rotation, cover cropping, precision agriculture technologies (including nanotechnology), RNA interference, genetic engineering, and the use of bioherbicides [14,15], the development of a novel herbicide with a unique mechanism of action remains critically important. Such innovations are essential for ensuring effective control of invasive weeds and safeguarding agricultural productivity, thus contributing to sustainable farming practices and food security.

In examining the sulfur assimilation pathway, there are additional enzymes, beyond those proposed by Hirase and Molin, involved in the conversion of sulfate to L-cysteine that could serve as promising targets for the development of herbicides with novel modes of action. The assimilation of sulfur occurs through several stages: the first step involves the activation of sulfate (SO₄²⁻) by ATP sulfurylase (ATPS) to produce adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (APS). Subsequently, APS can either be reduced to sulfite (SO₃²⁻) by APS reductase or phosphorylated to 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) by APS kinase. Sulfite (SO₃²⁻), a toxic intermediate, is rapidly reduced to sulfide (S²⁻) by sulfite reductase (SiR) and incorporated into O-acetylserine (OAS) by O-acetylserine(thiol) lyase (OAS-TL) to produce L-cysteine cysteine [16,17,18,19,20]. Targeting these specific enzymes within the sulfur assimilation pathway holds great potential for developing novel herbicides that can selectively disrupt the growth of target weeds while minimizing the impact on non-target organisms.

Recently, our research group identified seven OAS-TL inhibitors through molecular docking and virtual screening strategies [21]. Among them, S-benzyl-L-cysteine (SBC) was characterized as a non-competitive inhibitor of Arabidopsis thaliana OAS-TL (AtOAS-TL), exhibiting inhibition constants of K_ic = 4.29 mM and K_iu = 5.12 mM. SBC markedly reduced cysteine biosynthesis both in vitro and in vivo in maize and Ipomoea grandifolia, ultimately suppressing plant growth [22]. Structurally, SBC contains a benzyl substituent bound to the sulfur atom of cysteine (–S–CH₂Ph), forming a thioether linkage that increases hydrophobicity and facilitates interaction with residues surrounding the sulfhydryl-binding region of the OAS-TL active site. In the present study, we investigated a structurally related analog, O-benzyl-serine (OBS), in which the benzyl group is attached to the oxygen atom of serine (–O–CH₂Ph), replacing sulfur with oxygen. This modification results in a more polar molecule capable of interacting with the OAS-binding pocket rather than the sulfide-binding site of OAS-TL. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations indicated that OBS can occupy the same binding region as the natural substrate OAS, forming hydrogen bonds with the catalytic Lys46–PLP complex, thus competing with OAS and disrupting cysteine biosynthesis through a substrate-competitive-like mechanism. Therefore, while both compounds share a benzylated amino acid backbone, their distinct heteroatom linkages (S vs. O) lead to different physicochemical properties and modes of inhibition. The selection of OBS as the research focus was driven by the hypothesis that replacing sulfur with oxygen could alter polarity, molecular recognition, and transport across cellular membranes, potentially yielding a molecule with herbicidal potential but a distinct mechanistic profile from SBC.

Building upon these mechanistic insights, the herbicidal potential of OBS was evaluated in two weed species, Ipomoea grandifolia and Euphorbia heterophylla, both of which perform C3 photosynthesis but differ markedly in morphology, growth dynamics, and metabolic plasticity. Preliminary enzymatic data revealed that E. heterophylla exhibits approximately 30-fold higher OAS-TL activity in roots and 6–7-fold higher activity in leaves compared to I. grandifolia. This intrinsic enzymatic disparity supports the hypothesis that OBS, as an OAS-TL inhibitor, would exert stronger inhibitory effects in I. grandifolia, which possesses lower basal OAS-TL activity and, therefore, reduced metabolic buffering capacity against enzyme inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the differential physiological and biochemical responses of both species to OBS exposure using a set of quantifiable and integrative indicators, including (i) morphological and growth parameters (root and shoot length, fresh and dry biomass) to assess developmental sensitivity; (ii) OAS-TL activity and related enzymes of the sulfur assimilation pathway to verify biochemical inhibition; (iii) photosynthetic efficiency parameters obtained from light-response curves and chlorophyll a fluorescence to detect potential impairments in photochemical performance; and (iv) macro- and micronutrient accumulation patterns derived from ionomic profiling to identify systemic metabolic disturbances. Together, these complementary datasets were designed to establish a coherent framework linking OAS-TL inhibition to whole-plant physiological outcomes and to elucidate the species-specific determinants underlying differential sensitivity to OBS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

For the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we employed the three-dimensional structure of the maize OAS-TL enzyme, modeled as a homodimer complexed with the cofactor PLP and the substrate OAS, as previously described in [21]. The ligand OBS, whose poses had been selected in a prior molecular docking step, was manually positioned into the two catalytic sites of the enzyme, replacing the native substrate and generating the OAS-TL–OBS homodimeric complex.

In this stage, the molecular docking protocols were validated through the redocking of the native substrate OAS using AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina. Standard sampling and scoring algorithms were used in both programs, employing search boxes of 30 and 10 units and grid spacings of 0.375 Å and 1.0 Å, respectively. Redocking was repeated three times in each program, resulting in RMSD values of 0.95 ± 0.17 Å (AutoDock 4) and 0.31 ± 0.00 Å (AutoDock Vina), with corresponding docking scores of −6.93 ± 0.15 kcal/mol and −6.50 ± 0.00 kcal/mol. The same workflow was then applied to the inhibitor candidate OBS, yielding scores of −7.09 ± 0.12 kcal/mol (AutoDock 4) and −7.20 ± 0.00 kcal/mol (AutoDock Vina). OBS poses were reproducible across both tools, with RMSD values below 1.24 ± 0.48 Å. Based on its superior reproducibility, the pose obtained with AutoDock Vina was used as the starting conformation for the MD simulations.

This model was then submitted to the CHARMM-GUI server [23] to prepare all necessary simulation input files. A covalent bond between Lys46 and PLP was introduced, following the configuration observed in the Arabidopsis thaliana OAS-TL structure (PDB ID: 1Y7L) [24], resulting in the modified residue IT1P. The protein–ligand complex was subsequently solvated with TIP3P water in a rectangular box extending 15 Å beyond the outermost protein atoms, and the system was neutralized with counterions to achieve a final NaCl concentration of 0.15 mol L⁻¹.

MD simulations were performed using NAMD 3.0 [25]. The CHARMM36m force field was applied to the protein and the modified IT1P residue, while force-field parameters for the ligands were generated using SwissParam [26], considering protonation states at pH 7.0. Partial charges were calculated in aqueous phase with the ORCA package [27], using the B3LYP hybrid functional, the 6-311G basis set, and the TightSCF criterion to ensure convergence and improve accuracy.

System preparation consisted of five sequential stages. First, ligand and cofactor atoms remained fixed while 30,000 steps of conjugate-gradient minimization were applied to the remaining atoms. In the second stage, all constraints were removed, followed by an additional 10,000 minimization steps. The third stage consisted of solvent equilibration for 60 ps, and the fourth stage involved a further 30,000 steps of unconstrained minimization. The final configuration from this step served as the initial structure for the production simulations.

Equilibration was conducted under NPT conditions (1 atm, 300 K) for 100 ns on the Lovelace supercomputer at the National High-Performance Computing Center (CENAPAD), Campinas, Brazil. Trajectories were analyzed in terms of root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), radius of gyration (Rg), root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), and the frequency of contacts between amino-acid residues and the ligand within a 4 Å cut-off. RMSF values were computed using the last 5 ns of the trajectories, corresponding to the equilibrated portion of the simulations.

2.2. Plant Cultivation and Determination of Biometric Parameters

The seeds were selected according to size and shape and underwent specific dormancy-breaking procedures for each species. Seeds of I. grandifolia were subjected to acid scarification by immersing them in 98% sulfuric acid for 40 min to break physical dormancy, followed by thorough rinsing with deionized water. Seeds of E. heterophylla, which do not require dormancy-breaking treatment, were simply washed thoroughly in water. The seeds were then evenly distributed on moistened germination paper with deionized water. Another layer of paper was placed over the seeds, rolled up, and placed in appropriate tubes to maintain moisture. The tubes were then placed in germination chambers at 30 °C for 48 h for I. grandifolia, and 25 °C for 72 h for E. heterophylla.

Viable seedlings obtained after germination were selected, measured, and transferred to adjustable supports designed for hydroponic cultivation. Each plant was maintained in 150 mL of a complete Hoagland and Arnon nutrient solution composed of the following macronutrient concentrations [28]: 1 mM KH₂PO₄, 5 mM KNO₃, 5 mM Ca(NO₃)₂, and 2 mM MgSO₄, supplying nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) in balanced proportions. The micronutrient supplement contained 0.5 mg L⁻¹ boron (B), 0.5 mg L⁻¹ manganese (Mn), 0.05 mg L⁻¹ zinc (Zn), 0.02 mg L⁻¹ copper (Cu), and 0.05 mg L⁻¹ molybdenum (Mo), and iron was supplied as 0.1 mM Fe–EDTA to ensure adequate availability and stability. Plants were exposed to increasing OBS concentrations (0–500 µM), and the nutrient solution was renewed every 48 h to maintain chemical stability and consistent nutrient availability throughout the exposure period. After 12 days of cultivation, root length, stem length, leaf area, and the fresh and dry biomass of roots and shoots were recorded. Dry weight was obtained after dehydration of plant tissues at 70 °C until reaching constant mass.

2.3. Enzyme Activities of Sulfur Assimilation Pathway

Roots or leaves (0.1 g) were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and then homogenized with a buffer containing 50 mM Hepes/KOH pH 7.5; 10 mM KCl; 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerin, 10 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF [29]. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000× g for 20 min, and the supernatant was used as an enzyme source.

The activity of OAS-TL was determined according to Randewig et al. [29]. Enzymatic extracts were first quantified for total protein content using the Bradford method, employing bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. For each assay, 0.1 mL of enzymatic supernatant was mixed with 0.1 mL of reaction buffer composed of 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM O-acetylserine, 15 mM Na₂S, and 5 mM DTT. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 15 min, after which the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Samples were then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min, and 100 μL of the resulting supernatant was transferred to a new tube. To this aliquot, 100 μL of glacial acetic acid and 200 μL of freshly prepared ninhydrin reagent (250 mg ninhydrin dissolved in 6 mL concentrated acetic acid and 4 mL concentrated HCl) were added. The mixture was incubated in a boiling water bath for 10 min, followed by rapid cooling on ice. The absorbance was measured at 560 nm, and cysteine formation was quantified using a standard curve prepared with known concentrations of L-cysteine. Enzyme activities were expressed as specific activity (µmol × min⁻¹ × mg protein⁻¹).

2.4. Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Analysis

Gas exchange measurements were carried out on the 12th day of cultivation using the first fully expanded leaf, defined as the first mature leaf located immediately below the youngest developing leaf, showing no measurable increase in leaf area over a 48 h period and exhibiting a fully unfolded lamina without residual juvenile curvature. Only leaves that met all these criteria were used for photosynthetic assessments. To assess the parameters, gas exchange, and multiphase fluorescence measurements were combined using a portable photosynthesis system equipped with a fluorometer (Li-6800, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) with a leaf chamber with a 2 cm² measurement area. The temperature inside the chamber was maintained at 25 °C, and the vapor pressure deficit between the air and leaf was controlled at 0.2 kPa, with a flow rate of 700 µmol s⁻¹. Measurements were conducted between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., but only data collected during periods where the variables within the same experimental group remained stable were considered [22].

The gas exchange parameters measured included the CO₂ assimilation rate (A, µmol m⁻² s⁻¹), transpiration (E, mmol m⁻² s⁻¹), stomatal conductance (gs, mol m⁻² s⁻¹), and intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci, µmol mol⁻¹), which were derived from the light response curve (A/PPFD). The photosynthetically active photon flux density (PPFD) ranged from 2000 to 0 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ with the following intensities: 2000, 1900, 1800, 1700, 1600, 1500, 1400, 1200, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 175, 150, 125, 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. Chamber conditions were adjusted to maintain a CO₂ concentration close to ambient levels (400 µmol mol⁻¹). From the A/PPFD curves, the following parameters were estimated: the quantum yield of photosynthesis [α, (μmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹)/(μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹)], maximum CO₂ assimilation rate (Amax), light compensation point (Pcomp), light saturation point (Psat), and respiration rate (Rd), using linear and hyperbolic mathematical models [30,31].

In parallel with gas exchange measurements, chlorophyll a fluorescence was also assessed [22]. After 25 to 30 min of light adaptation, the following parameters were measured: effective photochemical quantum efficiency (Fv’/Fm’), effective quantum yield (ϕPSII), electron transport rate in PSII (ETR), photochemical quenching (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) [32]. These parameters were measured under an irradiance of 1400 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ in two conditions of CO₂ concentration maintained in the leaf chamber (400 and 2000 µmol mol⁻¹). After 10 h of dark adaptation, initial fluorescence (Fo), maximum fluorescence (Fm), and maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) were determined, with Fv calculated as the difference between Fm and Fo [33]. The flash was set to a saturating red light of 8000 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹, with three phases of 300 ms each and a ramp depth of 25%.

At each measurement point, data were recorded only after a stabilization period of 60–120 s, ensuring that all predefined stability criteria in the LI-6800 Log Setup were simultaneously satisfied. Stability was verified using three primary diagnostic parameters: ΔH₂O.Meas2 (slope limit = 0.5; standard deviation = 0.1; 20 s evaluation window), F.FlrLS (slope limit = 1.0; standard deviation = 1.0; 20 s window), and ΔCO₂.Meas2 (slope limit = 0.5; standard deviation = 0.1; 20 s window). Data logging proceeded only when all thresholds were met, confirming that the directly measured gas signals (CO₂ and H₂O) had reached true steady state. Because all derived physiological variables—such as photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration, and intercellular CO₂ concentration—are calculated from these primary measurements through embedded mathematical models, fulfilling these stability criteria ensures the accuracy, reproducibility, and biological reliability of both gas-exchange and fluorescence readings.

2.5. Determination of the Nutrient Content

To obtain the total contents of nutrients such as calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S) in roots and leaves, digestion was performed using a nitric-perchloric solution. Sulfur was determined by the turbidimetric method with barium sulfate, according to Malavolta and colleagues [34]. The contents of Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, P, and K were analyzed using microwave plasma atomic emission spectroscopy with the MP-AES 4200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as the means of independent experiments ± standard error of the mean. The number of biological replicates varied according to the methodology: four to five independent plants per treatment were used for growth analyses; three biological replicates were used for ionomic measurements; seven plants per treatment were used for photosynthetic assessments; and five biological replicates were used for OAS-TL activity. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism^® v9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Depending on the experimental design, data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test or unpaired Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to evaluate the stability of the modeled protein-ligand complexes and to analyze the contribution of individual residues in stabilizing the ligands bound to the enzyme’s quaternary structure. The analysis focused on the homodimeric form of the enzyme in complex with either OAS or OBS. As illustrated in Figure 1a,b, both the protein backbone and the ligands remained stable throughout the final 40 ns of the simulation, exhibiting a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of approximately 3 Å. The radius of gyration of the protein backbone in both complexes remained stable, indicating that the ligands did not induce any unfolding of the protein (Figure 1c). Figure 1d presents the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) for the alpha carbons of each residue, highlighting both the most flexible and stable regions of the protein. In the comparison between OAS and OBS, residues 208–218, which interact with OBS, displayed higher conformational fluctuations than when bound to OAS. Aside from this region and the terminal residues, there were no significant differences in RMSF values between the two complexes.

Further examination of the RMSF data helps clarify the biological relevance of the fluctuation observed for residues 208–218 in the OBS complex. Structural mapping of this segment shows that it corresponds to an extended and intrinsically flexible loop located away from the ligand-binding pocket. In contrast, the adjacent loop encompassing residues 219–240 directly contacts the ligand. Notably, this latter region exhibits reduced backbone fluctuation in the presence of OBS compared with OAS, indicating that OBS stabilizes the active site in a more closed conformation. This localized stabilization likely redistributes conformational dynamics toward the upstream 208–218 loop, accounting for its increased mobility. Overall, these data suggest that OBS binding imposes a distinct structural constraint on the catalytic-site architecture, potentially modulating substrate access and active-site breathing motions important for catalysis.

Table 1. Contact frequency of Ipomoea grandifolia OAS-TL residues with OAS and OBS ligands in the last 20 ns of molecular dynamics. Only contacts with a frequency greater than 5% are shown. The amino acid residues exhibiting the most frequent contacts in both chains are emphasized using bold formatting.

Residue	OAS Chain A	OAS Chain B	OBS Chain A	OBS Chain B
IT1-46	1.00	0.91	0.93	0.99
ILE-49	0.01	0.00	-	-
PRO-73	-	0.02	0.54	0.16
THR-74	0.01	0.10	0.68	0.70
SER-75	0.30	0.22	0.00	0.38
GLY-76	0.39	0.27	0.67	0.97
ASN-77	0.62	0.12	0.98	1.00
THR-78	0.89	0.26	0.99	0.98
MET-101	-	0.02	0.01	0.18
MET-125	0.01	0.02	0.69	0.72
GLN-147	0.18	0.10	0.92	0.11
PHE-148	0.39	0.06	0.77	0.54
GLY-181	0.58	0.66	0.78	0.33
THR-182	0.84	0.74	0.44	0.62
GLN-224	0.00	0.03	0.00	0.07
GLY-225	0.54	0.44	0.58	0.16
ILE-226	0.20	0.08	0.02	0.00
GLY-227	0.39	0.56	0.37	0.07
ALA-228	0.27	0.34	0.59	0.39
PHE-230	0.01	0.06	0.07	0.16

summarizes the contact frequency of ZmOAS-TL residues with the OAS and OBS ligands during the last 20 ns of the simulation, a phase in which the system achieved equilibrium (Figure 1). Notably, residues with more than 30% contact frequency with the ligands show distinct influences on each ligand. The residue IT1-46, corresponding to LYS-46 covalently linked to the cofactor PLP, demonstrated the highest contact frequency with both ligands (OAS and OBS). Additionally, THR-182 and GLY-181 also exhibited a high frequency of contact with both ligands. OAS showed significant interactions with residues GLY-225 and GLY-227, while OBS had higher contact frequencies with THR-74, GLY-76, ASN-77, THR-78, MET-125, PHE-148, GLY-181, and THR-182. Furthermore, variations in contact frequency between chains A and B suggest that interactions during the molecular dynamics simulations influence each chain reciprocally.

Analysis of the functional relevance of the residues identified in Table 1 help clarify the biological significance of the observed contact patterns. Residues Thr74, Ser75, Gln147, and the PLP-linked Lys46 (IT1-46) constitute key elements of the OAS-TL catalytic site [21]. Notably, OBS displayed high contact frequencies with Thr74 and the PLP cofactor, whereas OAS maintained strong interactions only with PLP. This shift in residue engagement indicates that OBS interacts more extensively with catalytic-site determinants, particularly within the substrate-binding region, suggesting that OBS may hinder the precise positioning of OAS required for catalysis. The distinct interaction profile of OBS therefore supports its potential to compromise enzymatic function through substrate-competitive displacement or active-site interference.

3.2. Effects of OBS on the Growth of Ipomoea grandifolia and Euphorbia heterophylla

The growth of I. grandifolia plants was significantly affected by treatment with OBS (Figure 2). Root length showed a dose-dependent reduction, ranging from 46% to 76% at concentrations of 62.5 to 500 µM (Figure 2a). Fresh and dry weights of the roots also decreased proportionally to the applied dose, with reductions of 53% to 88% in fresh weight (Figure 2b) and 29% to 76% in dry weight (Figure 2c) at concentrations of 62.5 to 500 µM of OBS.

The length of the aerial part did not show significant changes with OBS treatment (Figure 2d), but there was a reduction in fresh weight by 22% and 40% compared to the control at concentrations of 250 and 500 µM of OBS, respectively (Figure 2e). In contrast, the dry weight of the aerial part increased by 53% and 51% at concentrations of 125 and 250 µM of OBS, respectively (Figure 2f).

Leaf area could only be measured at 62.5 and 125 µM OBS, showing reductions of 52% and 93% compared to the control, respectively, as higher concentrations caused a marked inhibition of leaf expansion and pronounced morphological deformation, which precluded reliable measurements (Figure 2g). Leaf fresh weight decreased by 35%, 71%, and 92% at concentrations of 62.5, 125, and 250 µM of OBS, respectively (Figure 2h), while leaf dry weight declined by 17%, 73%, and 88% compared to the control at the same concentrations (Figure 2i).

OBS also affected the growth parameters of E. heterophylla (Figure 3). Root length was reduced by 19%, 47%, and 60% at concentrations of 62.5, 250, and 500 µM, respectively. Root fresh weight decreased by 32%, 60%, and 72% at concentrations of 125, 250, and 500 µM, respectively, and root dry weight was reduced by 38% and 72% at concentrations of 250 and 500 µM, respectively.

In contrast, the length of the aerial part was stimulated compared to the control, with increases of 25%, 23%, and 23% at concentrations of 125, 250, and 500 µM, respectively. The fresh and dry weights of the aerial part were not significantly altered by OBS treatment. Importantly, the increase in stem length observed in E. heterophylla corresponded to a genuine elongation of the main stem. Morphological inspection of the treated plants confirmed that the measured axis was the primary stem, indicating that OBS stimulated axial elongation rather than artificially increasing total length through lateral shoot emergence.

Although the aerial part showed increased growth, leaf area was reduced in a dose-dependent manner, decreasing by 34% to 89% at concentrations of 62.5 to 500 µM compared to the control. Fresh and dry weights of leaves were reduced by OBS treatment starting at 125 µM, with reductions reaching 84% in fresh weight and 85% in dry weight.

A thorough analysis of the morphology of plants treated with OBS revealed significant alterations in the development of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The leaves of both species exhibited signs of chlorosis and curling, which were more pronounced at higher doses of OBS. There was also an increased number of shoots in plants treated with OBS. In I. grandifolia, shoots emerged from the development of axillary buds. In E. heterophylla, in addition to the increase in shoots from axillary buds, new shoots also emerged from lateral buds in various regions of the hypocotyl below the cotyledons.

3.3. Effects of the OBS on the Activities of OAS-TL of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla Plants

The activity of OAS-TL in both roots and leaves of the studied species was modulated by OBS treatment (Figure 6). In I. grandifolia, OAS-TL activity in the roots decreased by 42% and 52% at concentrations of 125 µM and 250 µM, respectively (Figure 6a), while no significant changes were observed in the leaves. In contrast, in E. heterophylla, OAS-TL activity in the leaves was notably affected, showing a 75% increase at the 250 µM concentration (Figure 6d), with no effect on the roots.

3.4. Effects of OBS on Nutrient Content in the Roots and Leaves of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla

OBS significantly altered the ionome of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla plants (Figure 7). Several changes were observed in the roots of I. grandifolia (Figure 7a). Calcium (Ca) levels in the roots of I. grandifolia were reduced by 34% with the 62.5 µM OBS treatment, while magnesium (Mg) content decreased by 46% at the 125 µM concentration. Sulfur (S) levels dropped at both OBS concentrations, with 38% and 56% reductions at 62.5 and 125 µM, respectively. The effects differed when analyzing I. grandifolia leaves (Figure 7b). Magnesium (Mg) content decreased by 52% at 125 µM OBS, while iron (Fe) levels increased by 105% at the same concentration.

In E. heterophylla, alterations were also observed in both roots and leaves (Figure 7c,d). In the roots (Figure 7c), calcium (Ca) levels increased by 6% and 12% at 62.5 and 125 µM, respectively. Magnesium (Mg) content increased by 21% only at 62.5 µM. Iron (Fe) levels were reduced by 32% and 57% at 62.5 and 125 µM, respectively. Copper (Cu) levels decreased by 26% and 53%, while zinc (Zn) content dropped by 62% and 60%, at 62.5 µM and 125 µM, respectively. Manganese (Mn) levels were reduced by 48% at 62.5 µM but increased by 23% at 125 µM, while phosphorus (P) levels decreased by 33% and 20% at 62.5 µM and 125 µM, respectively.

In the leaves (Figure 7d), calcium (Ca) content increased by 5% and 10% at 62.5 and 125 µM, respectively. Magnesium (Mg) levels decreased by 18% and 29%, while iron (Fe) content was reduced by 54% and 20%, at 62.5 µM and 125 µM, respectively. Copper (Cu) levels dropped by 61% and 60% at 62.5 µM and 125 µM, respectively, while zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) levels were reduced only at 62.5 µM, by 67% and 63%, respectively. Phosphorus (P) content decreased by 21% at 62.5 µM but increased by 43% at 125 µM.

3.5. Effects of OBS on Photosynthetic Performance of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla

The effects of OBS on the photosynthetic activity of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla are shown in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13. Figure 8 and Figure 11 display the light response curves, along with the average values of stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), and internal CO₂ concentration (Ci) (Figure 8b–d and Figure 11b–d). When evaluating the light response curves, it is evident that in both species, the non-linear adjustment curve for control plants is very similar to that of the OBS-treated plants, with no significant change in CO₂ assimilation (A) as PPFD varied. In I. grandifolia, no alterations were observed in gs, E and Ci parameters. However, in E. heterophylla, OBS treatment reduced gs by 10% (Figure 11b) and E by 11% (Figure 11c).

Figure 9 and Figure 12 show the linear adjustment derived from the light response curves and related parameters, including α, Amax, Psat, Rd, and Pcomp. In both species, OBS treatment did not significantly alter any of these parameters.

Regarding chlorophyll a fluorescence, the data are presented in Figure 10 and Figure 13, where Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, ETR, NPQ, Fv’/Fm’, qP, qN, and qL were measured. None of these parameters were affected by OBS treatment in either species.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrated that OBS significantly affected the growth and metabolism of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla, two weed species. OBS caused a dose-dependent inhibition of root growth in both species, with more pronounced effects in I. grandifolia. The compound altered OAS-TL activity, particularly in I. grandifolia roots, where activity was significantly reduced, whereas E. heterophylla showed increased leaf OAS-TL activity at higher OBS concentrations. OBS also modified the ionome of both species, with changes in key macro- and micronutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and sulfur, which are consistent with the growth inhibition and morphological phenotypes observed. Despite these metabolic shifts, no significant effects were detected on photosynthetic parameters at the concentrations tested. Photosynthesis could only be measured at 62.5 µM OBS because at 125 µM leaf area was insufficient. Moreover, at 62.5 µM OBS, leaves did not exhibit sulfur deficiency symptoms. Collectively, these results support a functional model in which OBS primarily constrains plant performance through root growth inhibition, altered sulfur partitioning and nutrient homeostasis, and reduced leaf expansion, rather than through a direct impairment of leaf-level photosynthetic efficiency.

To assess the stability of OBS relative to the substrate OAS, molecular dynamics simulations were performed with OAS-TL prior to in vivo assays. Both ligands reached stability within 100 ns, and RMSD profiles indicated equilibrium of protein chains and ligands. Radius of gyration stabilization supported the integrity of the protein’s quaternary structure, indicating no unfolding during ligand interactions. Ligands fluctuated within the active site without loss of binding. Some residues interacted more frequently with one ligand than the other, suggesting distinct binding features; thus, mutations at high-contact residues could affect inhibition efficiency. Overall, these simulations support stable occupancy of the catalytic pocket by OBS, consistent with its proposed capacity to modulate OAS-TL function, while not substituting for kinetic validation of inhibition.

When comparing growth responses of I. grandifolia (Convolvulaceae) and E. heterophylla (Euphorbiaceae) to OBS, I. grandifolia displayed higher sensitivity, indicating species-specific effects. Root inhibition reached ~70% in I. grandifolia versus ~60% in E. heterophylla. At the highest OBS concentration, inhibition in I. grandifolia prevented measurement of some leaf biometric parameters. In contrast, E. heterophylla exhibited a modest increase in stem length; morphological inspection confirmed true elongation of the primary stem rather than an artifact of lateral shoot emergence. These contrasting outcomes indicate differential physiological resilience to OBS-induced metabolic disturbance, consistent with prior evidence that herbicide specificity can arise from variation in metabolic pathways and sensitivity to sulfur-metabolism inhibitors [22,35].

A mechanistic basis for the higher sensitivity of I. grandifolia emerges from intrinsic enzymatic capacity. Preliminary assays showed that E. heterophylla has ~30-fold higher OAS-TL activity in roots and 6–7-fold higher activity in leaves than I. grandifolia. These differences imply distinct buffering capacity under OAS-TL interference. Higher constitutive OAS-TL activity may better sustain L-cysteine homeostasis under partial inhibition, via maintained cysteine production or compensatory flux through sulfur assimilation. Conversely, the lower basal OAS-TL activity in I. grandifolia narrows its metabolic margin, increasing vulnerability to reduced cysteine synthesis and associated growth suppression and nutrient imbalance. Thus, basal OAS-TL capacity provides a parsimonious biochemical explanation for stronger root inhibition and sulfur depletion in I. grandifolia under equivalent OBS exposure.

OBS was identified by docking and virtual screening as a potential OAS-TL inhibitor, targeting an enzyme that synthesizes L-cysteine, a precursor for sulfur-containing metabolites essential for redox balance and cellular homeostasis [36,37]. In our study, OBS reduced OAS-TL activity in I. grandifolia roots, indicating disruption of sulfur metabolism at the enzymatic level. This inhibition is consistent with the intrinsically low basal root OAS-TL activity in this species (~30-fold lower than in E. heterophylla), which likely reduces buffering capacity and increases susceptibility to perturbations in cysteine biosynthesis. At present, it remains unclear whether reduced activity reflects direct OBS–enzyme interaction or indirect regulatory effects; gene expression profiling and in vitro kinetic analyses will be needed [35,37]. In contrast, leaf OAS-TL activity in I. grandifolia was not reduced, and a modest upward trend occurred across concentrations. Rather than indicating direct activation, this trend is consistent with an organ-level compensatory response to root sulfur limitation, supported by the observed decrease in root sulfur and accumulation in leaves, suggesting altered sulfur partitioning. Such adaptive responses under sulfur limitation are well documented [22,37]. Accordingly, we frame these organ-specific patterns as functional interpretations supported by ionomic and enzymatic data, while recognizing that molecular validation of OAS-dependent regulation will require dedicated transcript and metabolite analyses.

Recent studies with SBC, another putative OAS-TL inhibitor, showed strong photosynthetic impairment in Z. mays and I. grandifolia. In Z. mays, SBC induced sulfur deficiency phenotypes and decreased stomatal and non-stomatal parameters, including gs, E, Ci, Vcmax, Vpmax, J, and fluorescence metrics (Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, ϕPSII, Fv’/Fm’, qP, ETR) [22]. SBC likely limited L-cysteine availability for Fe–S cluster synthesis in PSI/PSII/cytochrome b6f, impairing electron transport, and reduced expression of photosynthetic complexes and Calvin/C4 enzymes, decreasing CO₂ assimilation [21]. In contrast, OBS did not significantly alter photosynthetic parameters in either species at the tested concentrations. While SBC strongly reduced photosynthesis-related metrics, OBS showed a milder profile, with no significant changes in Fo, Fv/Fm, Fv’/Fm’, or ETR. These comparisons indicate that OBS, up to 62.5 µM, does not phenocopy SBC-driven damage to photosynthetic machinery and instead primarily affects growth and nutrient status, including marked root sulfur reduction in I. grandifolia.

OBS did not significantly alter OAS-TL activity in I. grandifolia leaves, and photosynthetic parameters remained unaffected. Photosynthesis was assessed only at 62.5 µM OBS, the highest dose allowing adequate leaf expansion. At this concentration, total leaf sulfur increased in I. grandifolia, whereas E. heterophylla showed only a slight reduction. Importantly, elevated total sulfur does not necessarily imply enhanced assimilation through OAS-TL. Rather, it may reflect compensatory sulfate uptake and translocation in response to reduced L-cysteine synthesis; if assimilation is constrained, sulfur may accumulate in inorganic/oxidized pools instead of thiols. Similar compensation has been reported under impaired sulfur metabolism and may explain increased total leaf sulfur despite root enzymatic inhibition. These results contrast with SBC, which limited photosynthesis by restricting assimilated sulfur required for Fe–S clusters in photosystems and Calvin-cycle enzymes [9,22,38]. Thus, total sulfur measurements should be interpreted as indicators of partitioning and accumulation, not necessarily of increased reduced-sulfur assimilation.

Interestingly, OBS did not alter root OAS-TL activity in E. heterophylla but increased leaf activity, accompanied by reduced root sulfur and increased leaf sulfur. The sulfur-metabolism responses of I. grandifolia and E. heterophylla therefore differed under OBS. In I. grandifolia, reduced root OAS-TL activity was associated with reduced root sulfur. In parallel, sulfur accumulation in leaves suggests redistribution toward aerial tissues. In E. heterophylla, increased leaf OAS-TL activity may represent an adaptive response supporting cysteine-related metabolism in leaves under sulfur stress. Because these patterns derive from enzyme activity and ionomics rather than direct gene/metabolite profiling, we interpret them as functional compensatory signatures rather than definitive regulatory mechanisms. Sulfur-containing compounds, notably L-cysteine, remain central to redox homeostasis and antioxidant capacity in both species.

Another key finding is that OBS did not alter leaf-level photosynthetic parameters in either species at 62.5 µM, the dose at which gas exchange could be reliably measured. The absence of changes in gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence contrasts with SBC-mediated impairment [22], suggesting that OBS does not directly damage core photosynthetic machinery under these conditions. Moderate chlorosis does not necessarily reduce photosynthetic efficiency per unit leaf area, since chlorophyll content often exceeds what is required for maximal CO₂ assimilation under non-saturating light. Thus, maintenance of A, gs, and ΦPSII at 62.5 µM is consistent with mild pigment loss. Instead, OBS primarily affected root growth, sulfur metabolism, and leaf expansion, implying that OAS-TL inhibitors may reduce plant performance via distinct routes depending on structure and mode of action [17,22]. Photosynthetic data could not be obtained at ≥125 µM because severe leaf miniaturization prevented sealing of the LI-6800 chamber, consistent with the dose-dependent reduction in leaf area up to 500 µM. This limitation reflects extreme morphological restriction rather than absence of physiological effects. Accordingly, OBS likely reduces whole-plant carbon gain predominantly by limiting photosynthetically active surface area, while preserving leaf-level efficiency in the remaining tissue [22,38]. We therefore avoid inferring enhanced Fe–S cluster maintenance from sulfur redistribution alone, which will require direct assessment of reduced-sulfur metabolites and Fe–S assembly status.

Importantly, OBS significantly altered the ionomic profile of roots and leaves in both species. I. grandifolia leaves showed curling, which correlated with decreased root calcium. Calcium deficiency increases membrane permeability and compromises meristematic growth, often causing leaf deformation and chlorosis [39]. Calcium also acts as an intracellular signal coordinating hormone-related developmental processes, including auxin-dependent growth [40]. Thus, calcium depletion provides a direct physiological link to the observed morphological defects, independent of assumptions about primary hormonal targets.

Magnesium deficiency in I. grandifolia leaves and roots likely contributed to chlorosis. At 125 µM OBS, magnesium reduction was significant; at 62.5 µM the decrease was not statistically significant, yet chlorosis was visible, possibly reflecting early pigment limitation or delayed electron transport [41]. Despite this, photosynthetic parameters at 62.5 µM were not significantly altered, indicating that magnesium depletion did not reach a threshold limiting photosynthesis. Higher doses such as 125 µM, where depletion was stronger, could potentially impair photosynthetic function [42]. This pattern supports a dose-dependent separation between visible chlorosis and measurable leaf-level photosynthetic decline under OBS exposure.

The ionomic profile of E. heterophylla was more affected than that of I. grandifolia. OBS reduced iron, copper, zinc, and manganese, essential micronutrients for development [43]. In I. grandifolia, leaf chlorosis cannot be attributed to Fe shortage, since total Fe increased by 105% at 125 µM. This paradox is consistent with functional iron deficiency due to impaired Fe utilization. Although total leaf sulfur was not reduced, likely OAS-TL interference can compromise L-cysteine and downstream metabolites including SAM, required for tetrapyrrole/chlorophyll biosynthesis. In parallel, OBS reduced leaf Mg, the central atom of chlorophyll. Together, Mg limitation and reduced-sulfur metabolic constraints provide a coherent explanation for chlorosis independent of Fe deprivation. Copper, zinc, and manganese deficiencies can impair growth and biomass accumulation [44,45,46,47]. In our study, marked reduction in these micronutrients in E. heterophylla, likely due to impaired absorption, contributed to poor leaf development under OBS.

Both species exhibited loss of apical dominance, with reduced primary growth and emergence of lateral shoots (Figure 4 and Figure 6). This phenotype is consistent with altered auxin–cytokinin balance, which regulates branching [48,49]. Auxin from the apical meristem inhibits axillary buds, while cytokinins promote branching [50,51]. The OBS phenotype resembles scenarios where auxin transport is reduced and cytokinin action becomes relatively dominant. However, rather than asserting a direct hormonal target, we interpret apical dominance loss as an outcome compatible with nutrient imbalance and sulfur metabolic stress, both of which are known to modulate auxin transport and cytokinin responsiveness [48,49,50,51].

Beyond shoot architecture, OBS reduced root and leaf development and biomass, indicating broad growth inhibition. In I. grandifolia, reduced root sulfur is consistent with constrained sulfur assimilation, limiting synthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids such as L-cysteine and L-methionine, thereby restricting protein synthesis and growth. In E. heterophylla, growth inhibition was less severe, consistent with higher basal OAS-TL activity. Leaf OAS-TL activity increased at 250 µM OBS while root activity remained unchanged, a pattern intriguing for an inhibitor. One plausible explanation is compensatory feedback aimed at restoring cysteine biosynthesis, potentially involving increased OAS-TL expression in leaves. Because this inference is not directly supported by transcript data, we treat it as a functional compensatory interpretation supported by enzyme activity and sulfur partitioning patterns, rather than as a confirmed transcriptional mechanism. Nonetheless, this response was insufficient to sustain normal growth, as shown by reduced biometric parameters.

In E. heterophylla, although biometric parameters were also reduced compared to control plants, the effects were less pronounced than those observed in I. grandifolia. A key difference between the two species lies in the activity of OAS-TL. In leaves of E. heterophylla treated with 250 µM OBS, OAS-TL activity increased, contrasting with the unchanged activity detected in the roots. This finding is intriguing, considering that OBS was initially identified as an OAS-TL inhibitor. One plausible explanation for this paradoxical increase in enzymatic activity is that OBS might trigger a compensatory feedback response aimed at restoring cysteine biosynthesis. In this scenario, the plant could upregulate OAS-TL gene expression in the leaves to counterbalance the inhibited sulfur assimilation occurring in other tissues, particularly the roots. Although speculative in the absence of transcriptomic evidence, such an adaptive upregulation would be consistent with the plant’s attempt to preserve sulfur homeostasis under metabolic stress. Nevertheless, this compensatory mechanism appears insufficient to sustain normal growth, as reflected by the overall reduction in biometric parameters.

Thus, although OBS was identified as an OAS-TL inhibitor, its effects varied by organ and species. Contrasting responses underscore species-specific coping mechanisms to sulfur -metabolism disruption. In E. heterophylla, increased leaf OAS-TL activity may reflect adaptive feedback supporting cysteine -related metabolism under constraint. In the absence of gene expression evidence, we frame this as a hypothesis grounded in enzyme activity and ionomic redistribution, and we avoid asserting transcriptional upregulation as a conclusion. Ionomic analyses showed that OBS also altered macro- and micronutrients in roots and leaves; deficiencies in Mg and Ca may aggravate growth impairment given their roles in membrane stability, development, and photosynthetic competence.

Moreover, altered nutrient uptake and distribution, particularly Mg and Ca, can further affect signaling pathways. Calcium is a central secondary messenger, and reduced Ca can impair developmental and stress signaling, compounding growth defects. Magnesium limitation can contribute to chlorosis and potentially affect photosynthesis at higher stress levels. Other phytohormones (e.g., gibberellins and abscisic acid) might also contribute to growth inhibition under metabolic stress. Because these hormonal components were not measured, we discuss them as plausible downstream contributors rather than primary mechanistic claims, emphasizing that targeted hormone profiling will be required to validate this dimension of OBS action.

Although the present study provides important insights into the physiological and biochemical effects of OBS, several limitations must be acknowledged. Hydroponics was used to maximize exposure and avoid soil confounders, but it does not capture agricultural complexity; thus, environmental fate and performance in soil remain unknown. Effects on non-target organisms and selectivity were not assessed. From a molecular perspective, this study did not determine whether OAS-TL modulation results from direct ligand–enzyme interaction or regulatory control; therefore, gene expression profiling and in vitro kinetics using purified OAS-TL will be required. Organ-specific responses also remain partially unresolved, and future work should examine sulfur transport dynamics and OAS-dependent signaling under OBS. Importantly, the current dataset provides functional, integrative evidence (enzyme activity, ionomics, and physiology) supporting sulfur-metabolism interference by OBS, while explicitly delimiting mechanistic claims that require additional molecular validation. Collectively, these limitations reinforce the need for soil-based trials, fate studies, ecotoxicology, and multi-omics approaches to determine the agronomic potential and ecological safety of OBS as a prototype herbicidal scaffold targeting sulfur metabolism.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that OBS induces consistent biochemical and physiological signatures compatible with interference in sulfur metabolism in a species- and organ-dependent manner, supporting OAS-TL as a promising target for herbicide discovery. The distinct responses of Ipomoea grandifolia and Euphorbia heterophylla highlight the plasticity of sulfur assimilation and its coupling with nutrient homeostasis. Beyond growth inhibition, OBS induced imbalances in sulfur, magnesium, and calcium, associated with morphological changes such as loss of apical dominance and chlorosis, while leaf-level photosynthetic performance remained largely preserved at the highest sublethal dose measurable (62.5 µM). Rather than implying a simple depletion of L-cysteine or photosynthetic cofactors, the combined enzyme activity and ionomic data support a functional model in which OBS promotes compensatory shifts in sulfur partitioning and stress-related metabolic adjustment. However, the increased OAS-TL activity observed in E. heterophylla leaves and the maintenance of photosynthetic activity indicate that regulatory responses remain unresolved. Future work should combine in vitro enzyme kinetics with purified OAS-TL, gene expression analyses, and targeted metabolomics of sulfur-containing compounds to determine whether OBS acts through direct enzymatic inhibition or indirect signaling. Hormone profiling and nutrient transport assays will also be important to mechanistically link sulfur/nutrient imbalance to architectural outcomes. Overall, this work advances the understanding of sulfur -metabolism interference in weeds and identifies OBS as a valuable scaffold for designing selective herbicides targeting underexplored metabolic nodes. At the same time, the relatively high effective concentrations, the lack of soil-based validation, and the absence of selectivity/ecotoxicology data indicate that OBS should be regarded primarily as a prototype guiding the development of more potent, stable, and selective OAS-TL inhibitors rather than a final herbicidal product.