1. Introduction
Time series data were first seen as the realizations of stochastic processes that could be modeled using a variety of techniques borrowed from statistics and mathematics, mostly under the normal distribution assumption.
The complexity of many economic phenomena, coupled with the abundance of data sources, permitted the modeling of a wide range of economic variables. Yet difficulties rose when the data generating process was not statistically stable and exhibited noticeable variations, proper to financial data [
1].
Financial time series is the most evident example of complexity and difficulties economists usually encounter to explain variations or to make predictions. Sustained efforts to explain the stochasticity of such data generating processes improved the econometric literature and shifted the interest of researchers to non-linear techniques. Memory-based analyses [
2] were found to better handle non-linearities of many observed phenomena in life and provided a formalism for what was thought to be purely random realizations. While there was a consensus on adopting Brownian motion as the basis of time series analysis, Mandelbrot and van Ness [
3] found frequency-independent patterns when analyzing cotton prices on daily, monthly and quarterly bases, leading to the idea of fractional Brownian motion.
The advent of self-similar patterns, called fractals [
3], paved the way to new directions in time series analysis and popularized the earlier work of Hurst [
4] which designed a single memory measurement method while working on the Nile river flooding, known as
Rescaled Range Analysis. Due to the growing complexity of financial data, a spectrum of multiple fractal dimensions was found to better explain long-range correlations and fat-tailed data [
5], rather than a unique dimension.
Exchange rate remains a pillar of modern macroeconomic policy analysis and a substantial effort has been made to assess the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on different macroeconomic aggregates. Particularly, most oil-exporting countries do not adopt floating exchange rate regimes and they closely monitor international oil prices because the latter have significant impact on currency determination, and thus, incidence on the implementation of monetary and fiscal policies.
The exchange rate–oil price nexus was mainly considered under a macroeconomic perspective using the term “trade channel” [
6], while the wealth and portfolio channels focus, respectively, on short-term and medium-/long-term effects of oil prices on the nominal exchange rate [
6]. The latter effects were mostly investigated using linear techniques, overlooking the highly complex price formation of oil in international markets. Meanwhile, oil-exporting countries have always tried to protect their currencies from external shocks by adopting flexible exchange rate regimes to intervene, when necessary, to offset any adverse shock affecting macroeconomic stability.
While many macroeconomists use the term “trade channel”, linking real oil prices to real exchange rates, the availability of daily observations allows us to test hypotheses about the time-varying effects on the Algerian Dinar that originate from international prices. The exchange rate regime adopted by the country’s central bank is flexible, with the
de jure classification being managed floating, while the
de facto exchange regime is classified as a stabilized arrangement [
7]. The parity Dollar–Dinar remains a key variable in financial planning and its variability affects main macroeconomic aggregates as well as the oil and non-oil sectors, due to the country’s heavy reliance on oil exports [
7].
This work attempts to investigate the short- and long-term impact of international oil price fluctuations on the nominal exchange rate US Dollar–Algerian Dinar during the period 2003–2024, by adopting a bivariate fractal analysis that measures a scale-dependent link between the two series. It starts from the expectation channel hypothesis, which establishes causalities between the nominal exchange rate and the nominal oil prices [
6], in the sense that the Dollar–Dinar parity is impacted by international oil prices, knowing that Algeria is a small, open oil-exporting country, whose production does not weigh much in the international oil market and yet has shown a stabilization of its main macroeconomic aggregates over recent years [
7].
Investigating power-law multiscale dependence between the two variables necessitates a simultaneous assessment of short- and long-term impacts of international oil prices on the exchange rate, by running scale-dependent regression analysis (MRA) [
8,
9]. This methodology was designed to estimate scale-varying regression parameters under the assumption of bivariate power-law correlations [
10], using noise-free transformed scale-dependent signals. Consequently, we can simultaneously assess the short- and long-term impact of oil price variations on the Dollar–Dinar exchange rate, without running two separate analyses considering different time scales. Additionally, the MRA offers details on potential fractality transmission between the two series.
The use of latent states to model fractality originates from an earlier work on the use of Markov switching multifractal [
5] as a return volatility model, where the multiscale transition between hidden states follows a power-law. This works assumes that the MRA coefficients are the realizations of two intertwined hidden Markov states, taken as proxies of a latent transmission mechanism.
The findings confirm the power-law characteristics of both time series, with a pronounced non-linearity in international oil prices, as measured by the OPEC basket. The time-varying impact on the exchange rate Dollar–Dinar was approached using a two-state Hidden Markov Model. One state was found to have a reduced impact and could be used as a proxy of short-term effect for scales lower than three months, while the second state is more variable and has a pronounced impact on the exchange rate.
Over the short term, a one percent increase in international oil prices may lead to an average 1.1% appreciation in the Dollar–Dinar value, while the long-term effect may jump threefold to 3.4%.
An apparent short-term decoupling between the two variables appears to support the flexible exchange rate regime adopted by Algeria, as a safeguard of the Dinar value vis à vis the US Dollar, especially during sudden stops or sharp moves of international markets. This finding is confirmed by a limited fractality transfer from oil prices to the exchange rate, thus a reduced non-linearity embedded in the exchange rate series, compared to oil prices.
The effectiveness of monetary policy interventions helps offsetting the Dinar from short-term international shocks. However, such interventions appear to be limited over the long run, where pronounced trends in oil prices have a sizable impact that cannot be easily neutralized. This occurs during long episodes of receding oil prices where monetary authorities are concerned with macroeconomic equilibria and potential twin deficit situation.
Aside from the time-varying effects, the study demonstrates the importance of multiscale analysis when dealing with a high-frequency bivariate linkage, and the usefulness of scale-wise effect transmission to study the fractal causality. The variability of the obtained scale-wise parameters could be seen as the realization of a random process embedded with latent states.
The remainder of this paper is as follows.
Section 2 details the theoretical foundations behind the fractal analysis and the study of the exchange rate–oil price nexus.
Section 3 implements the MRA on the exchange rate series Dollar–Dinar vs. the OPEC oil prices to investigate the intrinsic properties of the resulting coefficients using a two-state Hidden Markov Model (HMM).
3. Application
Daily variations of both series have different characteristics, as shown in
Figure 2. Oil price variations exhibit repeated clusters of volatility with sizable jumps during the 2008 financial crisis, and then a decrease in intensity starting from 2015. On the other hand, the daily Dollar–Dinar variations do not demonstrate high variability, except during earlier months of 2020, coinciding with the pandemic. Both series of daily exchange rate and oil variations are free from chaotic patterns, as their maximum Lyapunov exponents [
18] are still inferior to 0 (respectively −3.379 and −4.818), meaning that they stem from stochastic systems despite the high complexity of their data generating mechanisms.
Daily variations are taken as the basis of the analysis, first by rolling the MFDFA to determine the degree of multifractality and identify its origin. For this aim, we define 23 intervals whose lengths follow a power-law, used to compute the variations of Hurst exponent
regarding the
qth order moments as natural numbers contained in the interval [−10, +10]. For each MFDFA estimate, nineteen (19) surrogates were generated as reshuffled original data from the IAAFT transformation [
16] and a 95% confidence interval is constructed to test whether the multifractal spectrum stems from long-term correlations of the small and large fluctuations in the series.
Figure 3 shows the MFDFA result when applied on the Dollar–Dinar series and confirm multifractality as
is not independent from
q. Small values of
q are associated with a persistent behavior as
> 0.5, while large values exhibit a mild anti-persistent effect close to a white noise (
∼ 0.5). This indicates that small variations in the Dollar–Dinar have significant long-range correlations, contrary to large variations, which are weakly correlated and slightly anti-persistent. The multifractal spectrum of the original series is contained in the 95% interval generated by surrogate data, displayed as dash lines in
Figure 3, suggesting the probability distribution of data being the source of multifractality, rather than the long-range correlation of large and small fluctuations.
The oil price series exhibits a rich multifractal spectrum, as shown in
Figure 4, compared to the exchange rate series. Small fluctuations are linked to a more persistent behavior close to the pink noise [
11], while large fluctuations are close to random walk properties, while the wide range of
denotes a pronounced multifractality having as origin both probabilistic properties of data as well as long-range correlations of small and large fluctuations. This different scaling behavior could be explained by extreme events, such as oil shocks and sudden developments in international markets, being more or less correlated than typical events [
17].
From the MFDFA, we can assert that there is an absence of a direct fractality transmission from oil prices to the exchange rate. In both series, large fluctuations could be assumed to follow a standard random walk; however, small fluctuations of oil prices have a higher persistence degree if compared to those of the Dollar–Dinar series.
The multiscale regression analysis (MRA) is performed as a combination of DFA [
14] with ordinary least square regression (OLS), known as fractal regression. The aim is to detail the transmission mechanism and estimate scale-wise effects as regression results.
Figure 5 shows the effect of oil price variations on the Dollar–Dinar exchange rate when considering different time scales. Overall, the effect exhibits a downward trend and has a negative magnitude, meaning that an increase in oil prices is linked to an appreciation of the exchange rate, and the inverse is also correct. This effect is weak, volatile and mostly comprises the interval
when considering scales inferior to 120 days, roughly three months. However, the impact grows in magnitude for scales greater than 240 days (8 months) and stabilizes at around −0.05 for scales exceeding 1.5 years.
The time series of MRA coefficients plotted in
Figure 5 was used to estimate a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) with two trend-free, latent states to potentially detect unobservable trends in the MRA. This resulted in the matrix displayed in
Figure 6. The first state (S1) is associated with a lower impact of −1.1%, while the second (S2) reaches threefold, to −3.4%.
Both S1 and S2 are absorbing states, respectively, taken as proxies of the short-term and long-term impact of oil prices on the Algerian exchange rate.
Figure 7 displays the probabilities of both states and concludes that a transition cutoff occurs at a scale of 108 days (approximately 3.5 months). This cutoff could be interpreted as a latent threshold separating short- and long-term impacts.