You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sports
  • Review
  • Open Access

26 May 2024

Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine: Reshaping Electrocardiogram Analysis for Athlete Safety—A Narrative Review

,
,
,
,
and
1
Discipline of Sports Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Sports Medicine Resident Doctor, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
National Institute of Sports Medicine, 022103 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Marius Nasta” National Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
This article belongs to the Special Issue The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Sports Cardiology

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is redefining electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in pre-participation examination (PPE) of athletes, enhancing the detection and monitoring of cardiovascular health. Cardiovascular concerns, including sudden cardiac death, pose significant risks during sports activities. Traditional ECG, essential yet limited, often fails to distinguish between benign cardiac adaptations and serious conditions. This narrative review investigates the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in ECG interpretation, aiming to improve the detection of arrhythmias, channelopathies, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. A literature review over the past decade, sourcing from PubMed and Google Scholar, highlights the growing adoption of AI in sports medicine for its precision and predictive capabilities. AI algorithms excel at identifying complex cardiac patterns, potentially overlooked by traditional methods, and are increasingly integrated into wearable technologies for continuous monitoring. Overall, by offering a comprehensive overview of current innovations and outlining future advancements, this review supports sports medicine professionals in merging traditional screening methods with state-of-the-art AI technologies. This approach aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in athlete care, promoting early detection and more effective monitoring through AI-enhanced ECG analysis within athlete PPEs.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular health is a critical concern for sports medicine physicians and a key component of athletic performance. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a leading cause of mortality among athletes and may result from congenital heart diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), channelopathies, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy [1]. Sports medicine doctors aim to prevent SCD through regular and effective screening. The pre-participation examination (PPE), which includes a structured protocol proposed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations (EFSMA), prioritizes the screening for cardiovascular diseases [2]. Sports and Exercise Medicine (SEM) professionals play a critical role in this process, ensuring athletes’ safety through systematic health screenings that encompass cardiovascular assessments including medical history and a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), occasionally supplemented by additional investigations. ECG, a non-invasive, inexpensive, and easily performed diagnostic tool, can provide critical information about a patient’s cardiovascular health and uncover potentially dangerous cardiac diseases. A study assessing the effectiveness of pre-participation screening algorithms highlights the limitations of questionnaire-based approaches, showing that cardiovascular abnormalities could be missed without thorough medical evaluation, underscoring the importance of comprehensive PPE [3]. Specialized protocols for interpreting athletes’ ECGs have been established [1]. Athletes’ ECGs often exhibit characteristics indicative of cardiac adaptation to increased physical demands, which, while potentially pathological in the general population, are normal and harmless for highly trained athletes. Consequently, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has proposed a standard for ECG interpretation in athletes [1]. Cardiac adaptation is beneficial for physical performance; however, subtle deviations in a normal ECG may indicate serious cardiac conditions, making it imperative for physicians to identify them accurately. The challenge lies in differentiating between normal cardiac adaptations in athletes and abnormalities that suggest potential disorders, requiring a comprehensive understanding of both the physiological changes in an athlete’s heart and the indicators of possible medical conditions, thereby necessitating a detailed step-by-step multimodality approach for accurate diagnosis [2,4,5].
The field of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, and its applications are being explored in various sectors of the healthcare system [6]. Many countries are grappling with immense workloads in their medical systems, frequently compounded by staffing shortages. In this context, AI has the potential to alleviate this burden and enhance the efficiency of medical care. The use of AI in interpreting ECGs has a considerable history [7] and recent advancements highlighted by Adasuriya and Haldar [8] demonstrate AI’s potential to significantly improve the detection and analysis of complex cardiac conditions through advanced algorithms, offering a more sophisticated, precise, and predictive approach to ECG interpretation in athletes [8].
The leading cause of mortality in athletes during sports and exercise is cardiovascular-related sudden death [1,9,10,11], emphasizing the critical need for effective screening methods. We aimed to explore the utility of AI in enhancing electrocardiogram ECG screenings during PPE for athletes. By integrating AI technologies, we aim to advance the early detection and prevention of cardiac anomalies, thereby significantly improving the safety and well-being of athletes engaged in intense physical activities. The potential of AI to augment the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of ECG interpretations offers a promising avenue to transform traditional screening practices into more sophisticated, precise, and predictive healthcare interventions. This narrative review will consolidate current research and delve into the implications of AI-enhanced ECG screening within sports medicine, highlighting its benefits not only for the general population but also specifically for the athletic community. By providing a comprehensive overview of current innovations and identifying future advancements, this study supports SEM professionals in bridging the gap between conventional methods and cutting-edge technologies.

2. Methods

We reviewed articles published within the past 10 years, utilizing the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The search was performed using the following keywords: “artificial intelligence” and “ECG”, “machine learning” and “ECG”, “deep learning” and “ECG”, “artificial intelligence” and “sports cardiology”, “machine learning” and “sports cardiology”, and “deep learning” and “sports cardiology”. After consulting MeSH, we found an exhaustive list of entry terms. However, we deemed a broader search too extensive and not sufficiently focused on our research questions. We included only articles written in English, comprising original studies and reviews. We selected studies in alignment with the ESC standards for ECG interpretation in athletes, particularly focusing on research that addresses borderline and abnormal ECG findings to ensure clinical relevance and applicability to sports cardiology. The research question was structured as recommended by formulating the population to comprise patients undergoing ECG testing for cardiovascular diseases. The intervention involved utilizing AI technology for ECG interpretation, while the control encompassed traditional ECG interpretation by professionals.

3. Results

The complexity of AI technologies involved in ECG interpretation is not the focus of this article. However, acknowledging that multiple mechanisms enable this process, each with its own limitations and advantages, is important. Table 1 summarizes the key studies reviewed, presenting their design, main findings, utilized AI technologies, and their applicability and limitations in sports cardiology. Subsequent sections provide an in-depth discussion of how AI is transforming ECG interpretation. This analysis addresses the technological advancements, challenges faced, and future prospects as suggested by the literature. It critically examines the role of AI in sports medicine, focusing on its practical implementation to enhance athlete safety and performance in clinical settings.
Table 1. Summary of Key Studies on Cardiovascular Health and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Sports Cardiology.
AI comprises technologies that process data and can emulate human cognitive processes [12]. This term is often confused with machine learning (ML), a distinct field. ML recognizes patterns from previous inputs, and its outcome generation does not adhere to specific rules. Consequently, ML relies on opaque black-box models that can be challenging to comprehend, making them less trustworthy for both doctors and patients [12].
Moreover, ML is prone to biases if the input data are not representative of the general population or do not reflect local management protocols. This issue is particularly biased in the context of rare diseases or underrepresented groups. ML encompasses both supervised and unsupervised learning systems [12]. Deep learning (DL), a subset of ML, simulates human cognitive processes through artificial neural networks (ANNs) with intricate mechanisms that produce outcomes [12,13]. DL does not require large, labeled datasets to process raw data and infer conclusions [13]. In contrast to traditional models, DL learns to internalize data representation, eliminating the need for human-selected features. This approach is highly effective in ECG analysis, enabling the detection of complex patterns without human bias [14].
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which optimize both data representation and analytical rules [14], are frequently employed for this purpose. DL is used in ECG analysis for screening a variety of cardiac and non-cardiac conditions. The selection among DL, CNN, and recurrent neural networks depends on the available datasets [13]. Widely used datasets include PhysioNet, the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, the MIT-BIH AF database, the MIMIC database, and Computing in Cardiology [13,15]. CNNs can also serve as a DL technique [15]. Unsupervised learning, another promising concept in cardiology, can identify latent structures and relationships in datasets without the need for labeled observations. This method has the potential to transform cardiology by enabling “precision phenotyping”, paving the way for precision medicine [9].
Common parameters used to assess the efficacy of AI methods in ECG include precision or positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), c-statistics, and F1-statistics [13].
Various AI technologies have been developed to identify different cardiac diseases using ECG. Bellfield et al. [17] highlighted a critical challenge in ML applications for sports cardiology: small sample sizes and imbalanced data often lead to overfitting and reduced generalizability, undermining the reliability of models for accurately diagnosing heart defects in athletes. The extensive analysis comprised 28 research studies. The review revealed a significant trend in sports medicine, particularly regarding the understanding of the athlete’s heart, with a pronounced shift towards adopting ML techniques. This trend was evidenced by 57% of the studies, characterized by their use of ML for developing models to address specific cardiac health-related challenges or for evaluating ML implementation in research areas with similar focuses [17].
Notably, Barbieri et al. [18] conducted an extensive analysis involving 26,002 participants to evaluate cardiovascular risk among athletes. Their methodology incorporated the analysis of tabular records and ECG characteristics, applying both decision tree and logistic regression models. The logistic regression model demonstrated notable efficacy with an AUC of 0.78. By contrast [17,18], Castillo-Atoche et al. [19] employed a more substantial dataset, consisting of 56,542 ECG samples from 487 patients. They utilized a CNN for real-time arrhythmia prediction. Their findings revealed an impressive accuracy of 94.3% on the training set and 93.9% on the test set, with these datasets originating from wearable devices [17,19].
The role of AI in ECG interpretation is to redefine diagnostic approaches, particularly through its ability to identify both known and novel physiological patterns, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy [39]. Key to this evolution are physiological experimentation and in silico modeling tools, such as saliency maps and generalized adversarial networks, which are crucial for refining AI-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) models [39].

3.1. Cardiac Structural and Electrical Alterations

3.1.1. Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia [40], with a significant portion of studies focusing on the ability of AI-ECG to monitor this condition. Research demonstrates AI-ECG’s effectiveness in detecting AF, including concealed paroxysmal AF, which does not appear on an ECG during examination [7,12,14,15,20,21,22,40,41]. The early diagnosis of AF through AI-ECG could decrease the incidence of unexplained embolic strokes and overall mortality associated with AF [14,41]. AI-ECG may also serve as a risk stratification tool for patients with AF, with or without additional clinical data, aiding clinicians in determining the necessity for anticoagulation therapy [7,20,40,41]. While some researchers argue that AI-ECG can identify “silent” AF but cannot predict its onset [14], others have found that DL algorithms can predict both the risk of AF occurrence and the progression from transient to persistent AF [7]. The most frequently cited AI-ECG method for AF identification and stroke risk assessment employs CNN techniques [13,14,21]. CNN is generally the preferred AI method for ECG analysis [13]. Attia et al. [21] conducted a retrospective study that demonstrated an AI-ECG technique’s ability to detect AF with an accuracy of 79.4% and an AUC of 0.79 [21]. AI techniques in wearable devices, such as smartwatches, have received FDA approval for AF detection using a single-lead ECG mechanism [15]. A study utilizing a CNN-trained single-lead recorder system with the AliveCor dataset screened for AF, showing AI techniques’ promising accuracy compared to insertable cardiac monitor devices [13]. A prospective study indicated a fivefold increase in the risk of AF diagnosis during 30-day continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring for individuals identified as high-risk by a normal, single AI-ECG scan [12].

3.1.2. Channelopathies

In children and adolescents, SCD is frequently caused by channelopathies such as long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS) [42]. The risk of SCD is elevated in young athletes because intense physical activity may trigger ventricular arrhythmias associated with these conditions. The application of AI-ECG is vital for the accurate detection of these cardiac abnormalities. AI-ECG has been demonstrated in some retrospective studies to detect long QT intervals in patients without measurements above the upper limit on the ECG trace by analyzing the T-wave [7,41].
Certain medications, such as azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine, which were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as antiarrhythmic drugs, can prolong the QT interval. A CNN-based AI study that analyzed the ECGs of over 2000 patients concluded that AI-ECG significantly improved the diagnosis of concealed LQTS compared to traditional methods. AI-ECG was particularly effective in identifying LQTS in patients with normal QT intervals and distinguishing between different LQTS subtypes [23].
A comprehensive review of studies highlighted the significant potential of AI, particularly DL and neural networks, in diagnosing and monitoring LQTS [24]. The integration of AI into clinical practice promises to enhance the precision of LQTS diagnosis, improve patient outcomes, and potentially reshape the approach to cardiac arrhythmia monitoring and treatment [24]. Therefore, the capability of AI-ECG to predict drug concentrations and prevent side effects [14]. Long QT syndrome or short QT syndrome can cause life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, which may be triggered by certain sports, including swimming. Evidence suggests that AI technology, integrated into mobile applications, can be used to detect abnormal QT interval prolongation [12].
The BrAID project highlights the capabilities of echo state networks, a type of recurrent neural network, in diagnosing type 1 BrS through ECG pattern analysis. Employing ECGs from diverse patient cohorts, the echo state network model exhibited robust accuracy in identifying type 1 BrS, yielding comparable outcomes when analyzing either three leads (79.21%) or solely the V2 lead (80.20%) [25].
Analyzing over 2000 ECGs from 157 patients, Nakamura et al.’s study [26] demonstrated the potential of an AI-enabled algorithm, specifically a CNN, in predicting ventricular fibrillation in patients with BrS. The model’s high precision in predicting the presence of ventricular fibrillation is particularly noteworthy, offering a promising tool for the early detection and prevention of SCD in patients with BrS [26].
Early detection and management of BrS are crucial in the ECG screening of athletes. Many cases of BrS remain undiagnosed due to the absence of ECG changes. However, the study by Melo et al. [27] yielded promising results by employing a deep neural network model to detect BrS signatures in standard ECGs, eliminating the need for proarrhythmic drug challenges. This model successfully identifies subtle ECG abnormalities that are often undetected by physicians [27].
Zanchi et al. [28] provided an interesting perspective in their study that employed an AI-based ML model to diagnose BrS by analyzing P-wave characteristics in ECGs. The study’s successful use of AI to identify BrS solely based on P-wave attributes represents a significant advancement in non-invasive, AI-guided BrS diagnosis [28].
Numerous review articles have cited studies demonstrating the potential of AI-ECG to recognize non-cardiac variables, such as serum potassium levels, particularly hyperkalemia, using CNN/DL [7,12,13,14,41], as well as age, sex [13,41], and glycemia [12,15]. Furthermore, Kwon et al. [29] developed a DL model that uses ECGs to detect and monitor electrolyte imbalances, showing high accuracy in both internal and external validations across various electrolyte conditions, potentially offering a reliable, non-invasive tool for daily clinical use [29]. Detecting electrolyte imbalances through ECG adds significant value to sports medicine. It has great potential for monitoring athletes experiencing electrolyte imbalances due to strenuous exercise or the misuse of performance-enhancing substances. Additionally, it proves useful in identifying reversible causes of long QT and Brugada-like patterns [1], thus avoiding costly and unnecessary further evaluations and ensuring efficient, accurate diagnoses in sports medicine.

3.1.3. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

In athletes, isolated QRS voltage criteria indicating left ventricular hypertrophy usually do not signify pathology, as they are rarely associated with HCM. Pathological left ventricular hypertrophy, on the other hand, often presents with additional ECG abnormalities such as T-wave inversion, ST-segment depression, and pathological Q waves. High QRS voltages alone, without other suggestive modifications, are typically considered normal adaptations in athletes [1].
HCM is a congenital heart disease that can be difficult to distinguish from athletic left ventricular hypertrophy, which results from increased physical activity. AI-ECG was proven to be a useful method to distinguish HCM from cardiac adaptation [14,21]. DL can detect this condition and other cardiomyopathies [13]. Studies also demonstrated the utility of the CNN modality, combined DL and ML methods, or modified CNN architectures in identifying HCM [15]. Recent research indicated that AI-ECG algorithms are more accurate in detecting HCM in young adolescents and adults but less effective in small children, due to the complex ECG characteristics present in small children that AI mechanisms do not take into account [30].
The study by Siontis et al. [31] has significant implications for ECG screening in athletes. Diagnosing HCM in this population can be challenging due to their unique cardiac adaptations. The application of AI, specifically CNN models, to interpret ECGs represents an innovative approach to enhance screening accuracy. The study demonstrated that the one-lead, median-beat CNN model achieved a high accuracy level, with an AUC of 0.90, in detecting HCM, particularly when analyzed through saliency maps. This model can effectively identify HCM by focusing on specific ECG segments, such as the ST-T segment, atrial depolarization, and the QRS complex. The main outcome indicates that ventricular repolarization is the primary region of interest for HCM detection [31].
Adetiba et al. [32] developed an automated model to detect heart defects in athletes using ECG and ANN. The study included 40 participants, both athletes and non-athletes, to encompass various heart conditions such as tachyarrhythmia, bradyarrhythmia, and HCM. The ECG data were pre-processed and analyzed using ANNs, with the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm demonstrating superior performance. The study successfully developed a neural network model achieving an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 90.00%, 91.96%, and 97.06%, respectively [32].
Lyon et al. [33] employed ML to identify four distinct HCM phenotypes using QRS morphology and T-wave biomarkers from high-fidelity ECGs. Their findings showed variations in HCM risk-SCD scores and left ventricular hypertrophy distributions. Group 1A, characterized by normal QRS and primary T-wave inversion, displayed the highest risk, with a combination of septal and apical hypertrophy [33]. This study highlights the potential of ML and the relevance of ECG phenotyping in sports cardiology to detect subtle cardiac abnormalities in athletes, which is vital for early intervention.
In the comprehensive study by Koo et al. [34], involving a cohort of 3060 patients diagnosed with HCM and 63,941 control individuals, the authors rigorously tested a model that demonstrated high effectiveness, with an AUC of 0.96, a sensitivity of 87%, and a specificity of 91%. The model performed exceptionally well in younger patients, achieving 95% sensitivity and 92% specificity [34]. Although further refinement and external validation are required, this model, tested on a significantly larger population than is typical in such studies, shows considerable promise for HCM screening applications.

3.1.4. Valvular Disease

AI-ECG is efficient in detecting valvular diseases from early, asymptomatic stages, and its effectiveness has been confirmed for the most common types of valvulopathies, namely, aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation [41]. Other studies suggested that both 12-lead and single-lead AI-ECG can predict the presence of aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation when these conditions are severe [7]. DL techniques have been tested for identifying valvulopathies with promising results. CNNs have been used to predict the presence of atrial stenosis using ECG data, such as T-wave abnormalities in V1–V4 [13]. CNNs have also been employed to detect mitral regurgitation by analyzing the P-wave flattening pattern and T-wave anomalies in patients with valvulopathy, as well as ORS complex data in those without mitral regurgitation [13].

3.2. Role of AI-ECG in Detecting Heart Failure and Arrhythmias

Due to its capability to detect reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and to differentiate between ejection fractions below and above 35%, AI-ECG can be effectively utilized in the emergency department [7,41]. AI-ECG can identify impairment of left ventricular systolic function even in the subclinical initial phase, where echocardiogram measurements may not indicate a reduced fraction [14]. Some false-positive results from AI-ECG were monitored over several years to determine whether the patients developed heart failure; the findings indicated that the patients were at potential risk of developing cardiac failure [14].
The theory is that ECG changes in heart failure could be explained by impulse and conduction alterations, as well as atrial and ventricular remodeling. However, it is crucial to avoid confounding factors such as arrhythmias, poor electrode contact, paced rhythms, and incorrect electrode placement [43]. The accuracy of AI-ECG in detecting impaired left ventricular ejection fraction has been demonstrated in both sinus and AF rhythms [30]. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction can be identified by AI algorithms, even in one-lead ECG scans [7]. AI algorithms can predict the need for hospital admission due to heart failure. One of the key advantages of AI-ECG is its ability to detect a low ejection fraction, identifying new cases of heart failure that might be missed if only an ECG were used without additional diagnostic tools [12].
Several studies demonstrated that AI-ECG methods surpass doctors from various specialties in accurately detecting arrhythmias. Martinez-Selles et al. reported a 98% accuracy rate in the detection and classification of arrhythmias [7]. AI has proven effective in identifying life-threatening arrhythmias, potentially reducing analysis time in emergency rooms and aiding in pinpointing the origin of ventricular ectopic beats [7].
Considering the advancements in AI-ECG technology and its proven accuracy in detecting heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and life-threatening arrhythmias, the future incorporation of Internet of Things wearables into sports cardiology holds immense promise. These devices may soon enable us to predict and potentially prevent cardiac arrest during training or matches for athletes. This represents a pinnacle achievement in the integration of AI within sports medicine and athlete safety.

3.3. Internet of Things Wearables

Internet of things wearables represent a technological evolution, offering continuous health monitoring and seamless data integration. They provide a convenient method for monitoring various parameters, commonly used to track heart rate, heart rate variability, and R-R intervals [37]. These metrics are instrumental in guiding training sessions, evaluating the body’s response to physical activity, assessing cardiovascular capacity for endurance training, estimating energy expenditure, and controlling training intensity based on heart rate to engage specific energy-providing mechanisms. Such monitoring can be achieved through ANN, support vector regression, or evolutionary neural networks. The adaptive particle swarm optimization dataset can be utilized to develop training models for athletes [37].
The Apple Heart Study pioneered digital health research, demonstrating the feasibility and effectiveness of large-scale, remote health monitoring studies. In a study involving 419,297 participants using a smartwatch app to detect irregular pulses, 0.52% received notifications for potential atrial fibrillation. Among those notified of an irregular pulse, the positive predictive value was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.92) for concurrent atrial fibrillation on the ECG with a subsequent irregular pulse notification. This indicates the potential of wearable technology for large-scale, remote monitoring of cardiac health [38]. Such technology could be beneficial in providing real-time data and early detection of cardiac irregularities, thereby enhancing preventive care and optimizing athletic performance.
Several studies highlight the capabilities of AI technologies in wearables, including the detection of premature atrial and ventricular contractions with an accuracy exceeding 97% [15]. However, other papers indicate that wearable devices possess limited capabilities in identifying arrhythmias other than AF [15].
An extensive study, which included more than 83,000 participants from two large UK Biobank sub-studies, highlights the significant association between premature atrial contractions and ventricular contractions (PVCs) detected in 15-s, single-lead ECGs and the increased future risk of cardiovascular diseases, including atrial fibrillation and heart failure [35].
In athletes, multiple PVCs are rare but may indicate underlying heart disease, particularly when originating from the right ventricular outflow tract with a prolonged QRS. Evaluation should include Holter monitoring, echocardiography, and stress testing. For athletes with high arrhythmic risk profiles, further investigation such as cardiac MRI and electrophysiology studies may be needed. Detraining can be considered in managing athletes with PVCs, as it may help in selected high-risk cases by suggesting a benign nature of the arrhythmia if the burden decreases during the detraining period. For atrial tachyarrhythmias such as sinus tachycardia, SVT, atrial fibrillation, and flutter, assessing for structural heart disease and potential genetic causes is essential. Ventricular arrhythmias, including couplets, triplets, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, always require comprehensive investigation due to their link with cardiac pathology and the risk of SCD [1,44,45,46].
Therefore, these studies offer a promising perspective for the use of wearable ECG screening in athletes to detect arrhythmias and assess their response to exercise. However, they also raise important considerations regarding the potential anxiety and over-investigation that athletes might experience upon discovering arrhythmic abnormalities on their ECGs.

3.4. eSports Athletes

Cardiovascular health in eSports athletes is a crucial concern, as they may have either known or hidden heart conditions [47]. The competitive nature of playing against human opponents typically stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, leading to changes in cardiovascular function [47,48]. The stress and physiological demands of gaming significantly influence ECG patterns in these athletes, often resulting in elevated heart rates and blood pressure during gaming sessions [40]. Furthermore, research conducted by Rossoni et al. suggests that eAthletes might face a high risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias and other cardiovascular conditions due to factors like mental stress, stimulant use, and prolonged sitting. Therefore, similar to traditional athletes, eAthletes may benefit from PPE, including ECG screening, to identify and manage potential heart-related conditions [47,48].
Current research, although limited, suggests potential cardiovascular risks, including an increased incidence of arrhythmias and other heart-related issues. This emerging evidence emphasizes the importance of raising awareness and education among healthcare providers and eSports teams regarding these risks. It also highlights the need to establish specific health and wellness guidelines and screening protocols to protect the cardiovascular health of eSports athletes. Integrating wearable ECG monitors and other advanced technologies into eSports training and competition shows considerable promise for improving player performance and health [49].

4. Best Practice Example

The Mayo Clinic serves as a best practice example in applying AI to healthcare, particularly through its AI-ECG Dashboard [14]. This internal tool enables retrospective analysis of patient ECGs, offering probabilities for conditions such as LV systolic dysfunction, silent AF, and HCM, along with AI-predicted age and sex. Integrated into the electronic medical record, it allows clinicians to quickly access AI analysis results for all available patient ECGs [14]. Such innovations in AI-ECG technology have significant implications for sports cardiology, especially in the pre-participation ECG screening of athletes, where accurate and rapid assessment is crucial.
In a notable collaboration, Who We Play For joined forces with Amazon web services to develop an innovative ML tool specifically designed for pediatric SCD risk detection through ECG screenings [36]. This endeavor began with the digitization and analysis of ECG traces using a DL algorithm, which initially yielded 78% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The model’s precision was further enhanced to over 93% accuracy, surpassing the capabilities of human interpretation, thanks to input from Who We Play For cardiologists integrated via Amazon Augmented AI [36]. This initiative showcases the use of advanced technology in preventing SCD by screening young athletes with ECG, offering a cost-effective and widely applicable method that could save lives.

5. Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, it did not constitute a systematic review encompassing all published data on the topic, potentially leading to the omission of important information. Second, relying on other reviews as data sources implies a dependence on the original authors’ interpretations and analyses, potentially perpetuating biases and selection errors. Third, the majority of the articles reviewed did not focus exclusively on athletes, a critical group in sports medicine. This oversight highlights a significant gap in the literature and underscores the need for further research specifically targeting athlete populations. Despite these limitations, the review aims to underscore the transformative potential of AI in sports medicine, particularly in ECG interpretation, and to encourage the targeted research that could ultimately lead to personalized and precise medical protocols for athlete care.

6. Conclusions

The application of AI in ECG interpretation aids in distinguishing between physiological adaptations in athletes and pathological conditions, a critical factor in preventing sudden cardiac events. Nonetheless, employing AI in this field presents several challenges.
Although AI shows promise in detecting known ECG anomalies, its capability to identify new or poorly understood cardiac traits necessitates further exploration and external validation.
Another issue pertains to the legal and ethical aspects of the medical profession, wherein each decision is the responsibility of the doctor, and liability is attributed to the individual. If AI were the cause of a medical error, it could complicate the determination of human fault.
AI technologies have demonstrated effectiveness in medicine, and implementing these methods can offer numerous advantages. We discussed AI’s potential to identify pathological features that might be missed by the human eye or easily overlooked, even by experienced professionals. Another important aspect is that some pathologies may not exhibit clinical symptoms at the time of examination, resulting in a lack of abnormal ECG findings.
This review highlights the transformative potential of AI in sports medicine, particularly regarding ECG interpretation for athletes. AI technologies, such as ML, DL, and neural networks, have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in detecting cardiac conditions, including arrhythmias, channelopathies, HCM, and valvular diseases. The integration of AI into sports cardiology is crucial for two main reasons: it enhances diagnostic accuracy and deepens our understanding of athletes’ cardiac dynamics. This approach promises more personalized and effective cardiac health strategies tailored to athletes [17]. The potential extension of AI capabilities to wearable devices opens new avenues for continuous monitoring and risk assessment in athletes during both training and competition.
The SWOT analysis depicted in Figure 1 emphasizes the profound impact of AI on sports cardiology, enhancing cardiovascular monitoring and diagnostics for athletes. It highlights strengths such as improved diagnostic accuracy and real-time data processing capabilities. However, it also points out significant challenges, including substantial costs, data privacy concerns, and potential threats like technological dependency and the risk of data misuse that must be navigated carefully. The opportunities section suggests areas for growth such as personalized athlete models and cross-disciplinary collaborations, enhancing the practical application of AI in sports medicine [50]. This strategic overview supports the aim of the review, which is to integrate AI in ECG screenings during PPE, assisting SEM doctors.
Figure 1. Evaluating the Future of AI in Sports Medicine: A SWOT Perspective.

7. Directions

Further research is required to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of implementing AI-based ECG interpretation in athletic populations and to confirm the reliability of this system in the decision-making process.
AI-driven ECG interpretation algorithms stand out from conventional methods due to their potential for continuous improvement [39]. Once optimized, these models can be adapted for new uses through transfer learning, thereby expanding their applicability, particularly in enhancing the efficacy and accuracy of ECG screening in athletes.
Future AI development should focus on creating customized ECG interpretation algorithms for athletes, incorporating age, sex, race, and sport type. Such a personalized approach will improve the accuracy of detecting cardiac risks, ensuring safer sports participation and more effective monitoring of athletes’ heart health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.S., T.S.D., A.M.I. and I.A.B.; methodology, A.M.S., A.C. and I.A.B.; validation, A.C., A.M.I. and I.A.B.; data curation, A.M.S., T.S.D. and A.A.A.; writ-ing—original draft preparation, A.M.S. and T.S.D.; writing—review and editing, A.M.S., T.S.D., A.C. and A.A.A.; visualization, A.M.S. and I.A.B.; supervision, A.C., A.M.I. and I.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

SCD, sudden cardiac death; ECG, 12-lead electrocardiogram; PPE, pre-participation examination; AI, artificial intelligence; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; IOC, International Olympic Committee; EFSMA, European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; ML, machine learning; DL, deep learning; ANNs, artificial neural networks; CNNs, convolutional neural networks; AUC, area under the curve; AI-ECG, artificial intelligence-enhanced 12-lead electrocardiogram; AF, atrial fibrillation; LQTS, long QT syndrome; BrS, Brugada syndrome; PVCs, premature ventricular contractions.

References

  1. Sharma, S.; Drezner, J.A.; Baggish, A.; Papadakis, M.; Wilson, M.G.; Prutkin, J.M.; La Gerche, A.; Ackerman, M.J.; Borjesson, M.; Salerno, J.C.; et al. International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 1466–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ionescu, A.M.; Pitsiladis, Y.P.; Rozenstoka, S.; Bigard, X.; Löllgen, H.; Bachl, N.; Debruyne, A.; Pigozzi, F.; Casasco, M.; Jegier, A.; et al. Preparticipation medical evaluation for elite athletes: EFSMA recommendations on standardised preparticipation evaluation form in European countries. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2021, 7, e001178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Palermi, S.; Sirico, F.; Fernando, F.; Gregori, G.; Belviso, I.; Ricci, F.; D’Ascenzi, F.; Cavarretta, E.; De Luca, M.; Negro, F.; et al. Limited diagnostic value of questionnaire-based pre-participation screening algorithms: A “risk-exposed” approach to sports activity. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2022, 33, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pelliccia, A.; Caselli, S.; Sharma, S.; Basso, C.; Bax, J.J.; Corrado, D.; D’Andrea, A.; D’Ascenzi, F.; Di Paolo, F.D.; Edvardsen, T.; et al. European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) joint position statement: Recommendations for the indication and interpretation of cardiovascular imaging in the evaluation of the athlete’s heart. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 1949–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Palermi, S.; Cavarretta, E.; D’Ascenzi, F.; Castelletti, S.; Ricci, F.; Vecchiato, M.; Serio, A.; Cavigli, L.; Bossone, E.; Limongelli, G.; et al. Athlete’s Heart: A Cardiovascular Step-By-Step Multimodality Approach. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 24, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sezgin, E. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Complementing, not replacing, doctors and healthcare providers. Digit. Health 2023, 9, 20552076231186520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martínez-Sellés, M.; Marina-Breysse, M. Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Adasuriya, G.; Haldar, S. Next Generation ECG: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2023, 17, 143–154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Harmon, K.G.; Asif, I.M.; Maleszewski, J.J.; Owens, D.S.; Prutkin, J.M.; Salerno, J.C.; Zigman, M.L.; Ellenbogen, R.; Rao, A.L.; Ackerman, M.J.; et al. Incidence, Cause, and Comparative Frequency of Sudden Cardiac Death in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes. Circulation 2015, 132, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harmon, K.G.; Asif, I.M.; Klossner, D.; Drezner, J.A. Incidence of Sudden Cardiac Death in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes. Circulation 2011, 123, 1594–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maron, B.J.; Doerer, J.J.; Haas, T.S.; Tierney, D.M.; Mueller, F.O. Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes. Circulation 2009, 119, 1085–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Danilov, A.; Aronow, W.S. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: Applications and Obstacles. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2023, 48, 101750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Somani, S.; Russak, A.J.; Richter, F.; Zhao, S.; Vaid, A.; Chaudhry, F.; De Freitas, J.K.; Naik, N.; Miotto, R.; Nadkarni, G.N.; et al. Deep learning and the electrocardiogram: Review of the current state-of-the-art. EP Eur. 2021, 23, 1179–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siontis, K.C.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Attia, Z.I.; Friedman, P.A. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Neri, L.; Oberdier, M.T.; van Abeelen, K.C.J.; Menghini, L.; Tumarkin, E.; Tripathi, H.; Jaipalli, S.; Orro, A.; Paolocci, N.; Gallelli, I.; et al. Electrocardiogram Monitoring Wearable Devices and Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Capabilities: A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 4805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Johnson, K.W.; Torres Soto, J.; Glicksberg, B.S.; Shameer, K.; Miotto, R.; Ali, M.; Ashley, E.; Dudley, J.T. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2668–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bellfield, R.A.A.; Ortega-Martorell, S.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Oxborough, D.; Olier, I. The Athlete’s Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Barbieri, D.; Chawla, N.; Zaccagni, L.; Grgurinović, T.; Šarac, J.; Čoklo, M.; Missoni, S. Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Athletes: Resampling Improves Classification Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Caamal-Herrera, A.; Atoche-Enseñat, K.; Estrada-López, R.; Vázquez-Castillo, J.J.; Castillo-Atoche, J.; Palma-Marrufo, A.C.; Espinoza-Ruiz, O.; Efficient, A.E.; La Foresta, F.; Castillo-Atoche, A.; et al. Energy Efficient Framework for a AIoT Cardiac Arrhythmia Detection System Wearable during Sport. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noseworthy, P.A.; Attia, Z.I.; Behnken, E.M.; Giblon, R.E.; Bews, K.A.; Liu, S.; Gosse, T.A.; Linn, Z.D.; Deng, Y.; Yin, J.; et al. Artificial intelligence-guided screening for atrial fibrillation using electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm: A prospective non-randomised interventional trial. Lancet 2022, 400, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Attia, Z.I.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Asirvatham, S.J.; Deshmukh, A.J.; Gersh, B.J.; Carter, R.E.; Yao, X.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Erickson, B.J.; et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: A retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 2019, 394, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harmon, D.M.; Sehrawat, O.; Maanja, M.; Wight, J.; Noseworthy, P.A. Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev. 2023, 12, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bos, J.M.; Attia, Z.I.; Albert, D.E.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Friedman, P.A.; Ackerman, M.J. Use of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Neural Networks in Evaluation of Patients With Electrocardiographically Concealed Long QT Syndrome From the Surface 12-Lead Electrocardiogram. JAMA Cardiol. 2021, 6, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raissi Dehkordi, N.; Raissi Dehkordi, N.; Karimi Toudeshki, K.; Farjoo, M.H. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome: A Review of Current State, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Mayo Clin. Proc. Digit. Health 2024, 2, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vozzi, F.; Dimitri, G.; Piacenti, M.; Zucchelli, G.; Solarino, G.; Nesti, M.; Pieragnoli, P.; Gallicchio, C.; Persiani, E.; Morales, M.; et al. Artificial intelligence algorithms for the recognition of Brugada type 1 pattern on standard 12-leads ECG. EP Eur. 2022, 24, euac053-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakamura, T.; Aiba, T.; Shimizu, W.; Furukawa, T.; Sasano, T. Prediction of the Presence of Ventricular Fibrillation From a Brugada Electrocardiogram Using Artificial Intelligence. Circ. J. 2023, 87, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Melo, L.; Ciconte, G.; Christy, A.; Vicedomini, G.; Anastasia, L.; Pappone, C.; Grant, E. Deep learning unmasks the ECG signature of Brugada syndrome. PNAS Nexus 2023, 2, pgad327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zanchi, B.; Faraci, F.D.; Gharaviri, A.; Bergonti, M.; Monga, T.; Auricchio, A.; Conte, G. Identification of Brugada syndrome based on P-wave features: An artificial intelligence-based approach. EP Eur. 2023, 25, euad334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwon, J.M.; Jung, M.S.; Kim, K.H.; Jo, Y.Y.; Shin, J.H.; Cho, Y.H.; Lee, Y.J.; Ban, J.H.; Jeon, K.H.; Lee, S.Y.; et al. Artificial intelligence for detecting electrolyte imbalance using electrocardiography. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021, 26, e12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aro, A.L.; Jaakkola, I. Artificial intelligence in ECG screening: Ready for prime time? Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 344, 111–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siontis, K.C.; Suárez, A.B.; Sehrawat, O.; Ackerman, M.J.; Attia, Z.I.; Friedman, P.A.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Maanja, M. Saliency maps provide insights into artificial intelligence-based electrocardiography models for detecting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Electrocardiol. 2023, 81, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Adetiba, E.; Iweanya, V.C.; Popoola, S.I.; Adetiba, J.N.; Menon, C. Automated detection of heart defects in athletes based on electrocardiography and artificial neural network. Cogent Eng. 2017, 4, 1411220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lyon, A.; Ariga, R.; Mincholé, A.; Mahmod, M.; Ormondroyd, E.; Laguna, P.; de Freitas, N.; Neubauer, S.; Watkins, H.; Rodriguez, B. Distinct ECG phenotypes identified in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning associate with arrhythmic risk markers. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 328675. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ko, W.Y.; Siontis, K.C.; Attia, Z.I.; Carter, R.E.; Kapa, S.; Ommen, S.R.; Demuth, S.J.; Ackerman, M.J.; Gersh, B.J.; Arruda-Olson, A.M.; et al. Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Orini, M.; Van Duijvenboden, S.; Young, W.J.; Ramírez, J.; Jones, A.R.; Tinker, A.; Munroe, P.B.; Lambiase, P.D. Premature atrial and ventricular contractions detected on wearable-format electrocardiograms and prediction of cardiovascular events. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 2023, 4, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Helping Prevent Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Young Athletes with AI|AWS Public Sector Blog. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/publicsector/helping-prevent-sudden-cardiac-arrest-young-athletes-ai/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
  37. Ahmad, S.Z.R.S.; Yusoff, Y.; Zain, A.M.; Samsudin, R.; Ghazali, N.E. AI for Heart Rate Measurements for Sport Performance: A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 551, 012041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perez, M.V.; Mahaffey, K.W.; Hedlin, H.; Rumsfeld, J.S.; Garcia, A.; Ferris, T.; Balasubramanian, V.; Russo, A.M.; Rajmane, A.; Cheung, L.; et al. Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kashou, A.H.; Adedinsewo, D.A.; Siontis, K.C.; Noseworthy, P.A. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled ECG: Physiologic and Pathophysiologic Insights and Implications. Compr. Physiol. 2022, 12, 3417–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sehrawat, O.; Kashou, A.H.; Noseworthy, P.A. Artificial intelligence and atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2022, 33, 1932–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Attia, Z.I.; Harmon, D.M.; Behr, E.R.; Friedman, P.A. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 4717–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ragazzoni, G.L.; Cavigli, L.; Cavarretta, E.; Maffei, S.; Mandoli, G.E.; Pastore, M.C.; Valente, S.; Focardi, M.; Cameli, M.; Salvo, G.D.; et al. How to evaluate resting ECG and imaging in children practising sport: A critical review and proposal of an algorithm for ECG interpretation. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023, 30, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Anderson, K.P. Artificial intelligence-augmented ECG assessment: The promise and the challenge. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2019, 30, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Biffi, A.; Pelliccia, A.; Verdile, L.; Fernando, F.; Spataro, A.; Caselli, S.; Santini, M.; Maron, B.J. Long-term clinical significance of frequent and complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias in trained athletes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pelliccia, A.; Culasso, F.; Di Paolo, F.M.; Accettura, D.; Cantore, R.; Castagna, W.; Ciacciarelli, A.; Costini, G.; Cuffari, B.; Drago, E.; et al. Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in a large, unselected population undergoing pre-participation cardiovascular screening. Eur. Heart J. 2007, 28, 2006–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Biffi, A.; Palermi, S.; D’Ascenzi, F.; Bonifazi, M.; Zorzi, A.; Corrado, D. Premature ventricular beats in athletes: To detrain or not to detrain? Br. J. Sports Med. 2024, 58, 407–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rossoni, A.; Vecchiato, M.; Brugin, E.; Tranchita, E.; Adami, P.E.; Bartesaghi, M.; Cavarretta, E.; Palermi, S. The eSports Medicine: Pre-Participation Screening and Injuries Management—An Update. Sports 2023, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yamagata, K.; Yamagata, L.M.; Abela, M. A review article of the cardiovascular sequalae in esport athletes: A cause for concern? Hell. J. Cardiol. 2022, 68, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Koshy, A.; Koshy, G.M. The potential of physiological monitoring technologies in esports. Int. J. Esports 2020, 1, 1–11. Available online: https://www.ijesports.org/article/22/html (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  50. Palermi, S.; Vecchiato, M.; Saglietto, A.; Niederseer, D.; Oxborough, D.; Ortega-Martorell, S.; Olier, I.; Castelletti, S.; Baggish, A.; Maffessanti, F.; et al. Unlocking the potential of artificial intelligence in sports cardiology: Does it have a role in evaluating athlete’s heart? Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2024, 31, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.