In submitting conference proceedings to Medical Sciences Forum, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review as administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to meet the professional and scientific standard that is expected of a proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: double-blind.
- Conference submission management system: all correspondence related to submissions and review processes was managed by e-mail.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 15.
- Number of submissions accepted: 10.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 66.7%.
- Average number of reviews per paper: two revisions.
- Total number of reviewers involved: thirteen reviewers.
- Any additional information on the review process: all authors proceeded with all the adjustments suggested by the reviewers.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).